Patent Grant
11904306
The present disclosure relates to a catalyst structure and a method for producing the catalyst structure.
In recent years, as a measure against global warming, there is a focus on a technology of bringing carbon dioxide and methane, which are causative substance of global warming into contact with one another, and converting them into a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen (dry reforming).
As for a catalyst to be used when producing such a synthesis gas, Patent Document 1, for example, discloses a catalyst that utilizes an oxygen-deficient perovskite-type composite oxide containing Mn, a predetermined alkaline earth metal and the like as a carrier, and utilizes nickel as a carried metal.
However, the reaction of bringing carbon dioxide into contact with methane and converting them into a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen needs to be performed at a high temperature of 800° C. or higher. In the catalyst disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid Open No. 2013-255911 (Patent Document 1), since a metal is carried on a surface of a carrier, the catalyst particles aggregate with each other at a high temperature and the catalytic activity tends to decrease, and also the catalytic activity is not necessarily sufficient.
As for a method of inhibiting the adhesion among catalyst particles and increasing the specific surface area of the catalyst particles, Japanese Patent Application Laid Open No. 2016-2527, for example, discloses a method of fixing catalyst particles on a substrate surface, and performing oxidation treatment and reduction treatment under predetermined conditions.
However, even with the catalyst structure disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid Open No. 2016-2527 in which the catalyst particles are fixed on the surface of the base material, the catalytic activity decreases when the catalyst structure is placed in a reaction field of a high temperature. For this reason, in order to regenerate the catalyst function, the oxidation treatment and the reduction treatment need to be performed again and the operation becomes complicated.
In addition, hydrogen is expected as a raw material of new energy and used for production in a hydrogen producing apparatus for a hydrogen station and in a fixed fuel cell system expected to be widely spread to homes and small and medium-sized businesses, and the like, and an on-site production is under consideration.
For example, steam reforming of natural gas also referred to as steam methane reforming (SMR) is a major method of producing a large quantity of hydrogen for commercial use, in addition to hydrogen used in an industrial ammonia synthesis. In addition, the method is the most inexpensive method. When a metal catalyst exists at a high temperature (700 to 1100° C.), steam reacts with methane, and carbon monoxide and hydrogen are obtained.
Recently, in addition to a fuel reforming apparatus utilizing the above described steam reforming reaction, a reforming apparatus of a type using partial oxidation reaction in combination with steam reforming reaction has been developed (Japanese Patent Application Laid Open No. 2000-323164) mainly targeting on fuel cell power generation apparatuses for electric vehicles and of a portable type that require to be compact and to start up in a short time period.
Here, the steam reforming reaction (reaction formula (2) indicated below) is an endothermic reaction in which heat must be given from outside. On the other hand, the partial oxidation reaction (reaction formula (1) indicated below) is an exothermic reaction.
CH4+½O2→2H2+CO (1), and
CH4+H2O→3H2+CO (2)
Accordingly, in the reforming apparatus as described above, by concomitantly using the partial oxidation reaction in the same reaction vessel, it is possible to supply heat required for the steam reforming reaction and perform the reaction, and thereby an external heating device becomes unnecessary. Accordingly, the apparatus becomes compact, and the start-up period of the reformer can be shortened.
However, in the reforming apparatus as described above, since a combustion reaction occurs due to the partial oxidation reaction, even under the presence of a very small amount of oxygen, an aggregation of the catalyst may be caused depending on a temperature history at high temperature, and a catalytic performance may be lost in a short time period. For this reason, according to a conventional apparatus and an operation method thereof, the performance of the reformer deteriorates along with the deterioration of the catalyst, with the lapse of time.
In addition, thermodynamically, the steam reforming reaction is more advantageous at a higher temperature, and a reaction temperature of 700° C. or higher is necessary depending on the type of hydrocarbon. Accordingly, a catalyst for steam reforming of hydrocarbons is required to have excellent heat resistance, high temperature stability and a fixed high temperature strength, as well as high activity. Conventionally, transition metal carried on a carrier is generally used as a catalyst for steam reforming of hydrocarbons. The order of activities of metal catalysts in the steam reforming of methane (CH4) is determined to be Rh, Ru>Ir>Ni, Pt, Pd (Masaru Ichikawa, et al., “Advanced Technology of Methane Chemical Conversion”, CMC Publishing Co., Ltd., in 2008). Among the metals, the precious metals Rh and Ru have the highest activity, but the cost is high. In addition, Ni is relatively inexpensive and is widely used industrially, but the activity and heat resistance are not sufficient if fine particles of Ni are merely used as a catalyst having a conventional morphology.
The present disclosure is related to providing a catalyst structure with a reduced decrease in a catalytic activity and capable of efficiently producing a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and to providing a method for producing the catalyst structure.
The present disclosure is also related to providing a catalyst structure capable of adequately keeping the catalytic activity by inhibiting the aggregation of catalyst particles and efficiently producing a reformed gas containing hydrogen from a reforming feedstock including hydrocarbons, and to providing a method for producing the catalyst structure.
A first aspect of the present disclosure is a catalyst structure including:
a carrier of a porous structure composed of a zeolite type compound; and
at least one catalytic material existing in the carrier,
the carrier having channels communicating with each other,
the catalytic material being a metal fine particle and existing at least in the channel of the carrier.
A second aspect of the present disclosure is a method for producing a catalyst structure including:
baking a precursor material (B) having a precursor material (A) for obtaining a carrier of a porous structure composed of a zeolite type compound impregnated with a metal-containing solution;
hydrothermally treating a precursor material (C) obtained by baking the precursor material (B); and
subjecting the hydrothermally treated precursor material (C) to reduction treatment.
According to the present disclosure, the decrease of the catalytic activity is inhibited, and it becomes possible to efficiently produce a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
In addition, according to the present disclosure, it becomes possible to adequately keep the catalytic activity by inhibiting the aggregation of catalyst particles, and efficiently produce a reformed gas containing hydrogen from a reforming feedstock containing a hydrocarbon.
Embodiments
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[Configuration of Catalyst Structure]
As is shown in
In the catalyst structure 1, a plurality of the catalytic materials 20, 20 and so on are included inside the porous structure of the carrier 10. The catalytic material 20 may be a substance having a catalytic ability (catalytic activity), and is specifically a metal fine particle. The metal fine particle will be described in detail later.
The carrier 10 has a porous structure, and, preferably, as shown in
Due to such a configuration, the movement of the catalytic material 20 in the carrier 10 is restricted, and the catalytic materials 20 and 20 are effectively prevented from aggregating with each other. As a result, a decrease in an effective surface area of the catalytic material 20 can be effectively inhibited, and the catalytic activity of the catalytic material 20 continues over a long period of time. Specifically, with the catalyst structure 1, it is possible to inhibit the decrease in the catalytic activity due to aggregation of the catalytic materials 20, and achieve the extension of the life of the catalyst structure 1. In addition, due to the extension of the life of the catalyst structure 1, it becomes possible to reduce the frequency of replacement of the catalyst structure 1, greatly reduce the amount of waste of the used catalyst structure 1, and achieve resource saving.
Usually, when using the catalyst structure in a fluid, there is a possibility that the catalyst structure receives an external force from the fluid. In this case, if the catalytic material is only attached to an outer surface of the carrier 10, the catalytic material may easily detach from the outer surface of the carrier 10 due to an influence of the external force applied by the fluid. On the other hand, with the catalyst structure 1, the catalytic material 20 is held at least in the channel 11 of the carrier 10, and accordingly, even if subjected to the external force from the fluid, the catalytic material 20 is less likely to detach from the carrier 10. Specifically, when the catalyst structure 1 is in the fluid, the fluid flows into the channel 11 from the pore 11a of the carrier 10, and accordingly, it is considered that a speed of the fluid flowing in the channel 11 becomes slower than the speed of the fluid flowing on the outer surface of the carrier 10, due to flow path resistance (frictional force). Due to an influence of such flow path resistance, the pressure from the fluid applied to the catalytic material 20 held in the channel 11 becomes lower than the pressure from the fluid applied to the catalytic material outside the carrier 10. Because of this, the catalytic material 20 existing in the carrier 11 can be effectively inhibited from being detached, and it becomes possible to stably keep the catalytic activity of the catalytic material 20 for a long period of time. It is considered that the above described flow path resistance becomes greater as the channel 11 of the carrier 10 has a plurality of bends and branches, and the inside of the carrier 10 is more complicated and has a three-dimensional structure.
In addition, it is preferable that the channel 11 has any one of a one-dimensional pore, a two-dimensional pore and a three-dimensional pore defined by a framework structure of a zeolite type compound, and an enlarged diameter portion 12 different from any one of the above described one-dimensional pore, the above described two-dimensional pore and the above described three-dimensional pore. It is preferable that the catalytic material 20 exists at least at the enlarged diameter portion 12, and it is more preferable that the catalytic material 20 is included at least in the enlarged diameter portion 12. Due to the above configuration, the movement of the catalytic material 20 in the carrier 10 is further restricted, and it is possible to more effectively prevent the catalytic material 20 from detaching and/or the catalytic materials 20 and 20 from aggregating with each other. The inclusion refers to such a state that the catalytic material 20 is included in the carrier 10. The catalytic material 20 and the carrier 10 do not necessarily come in direct contact with each other, but the catalytic material 20 may be indirectly held by the carrier 10 in such a state that another substance (for example, surface active agent or the like) interposes between the catalytic material 20 and the carrier 10. Herein, the term “one-dimensional pore” refers to a tunnel-type or cage-type pore forming a one-dimensional channel, or a plurality of tunnel-type or cage-type pores (a plurality of one-dimensional channels) forming a plurality of one-dimensional channels. The two-dimensional pore refers to a two-dimensional channel formed of a plurality of one-dimensional channels that are two-dimensionally connected, and the three-dimensional pore refers to a three-dimensional channel formed of a plurality of one-dimensional channels that are three-dimensionally connected.
In addition, it is preferable that the enlarged diameter portion 12 makes a plurality of pores 11a and 11a forming any one of the above described one-dimensional pore, the above described two-dimensional pore and the above described three-dimensional pore communicate with each other. By the above configuration, a separate channel different from the one-dimensional pore, the two-dimensional pore or the three-dimensional pore is provided inside the carrier 10, and accordingly, it is possible to exhibit the function of the catalytic material 20 more.
In addition, it is preferable that the channel 11 is three-dimensionally formed in the inside of the carrier 10 so as to include a branched portion or a merging portion, and the enlarged diameter portion 12 is provided in the above described branched portion or the merging portion of the channels 11.
The average inner diameter DF of the channel 11 formed in the carrier 10 is calculated from the average value of the minor axis and the major axis of the pore 11a forming any one of the above described one-dimensional pore, the above described two-dimensional pore and the above described three-dimensional pore, is 0.1 nm to 1.5 nm, for example, and preferably is 0.5 nm to 0.8 nm. In addition, the inner diameter DE of the enlarged diameter portion 12 is, for example, 0.5 to 50 nm, preferably is 1.1 to 40 nm, and more preferably is 1.1 nm to 3.3 nm. The inner diameter DE of the enlarged diameter portion 12 depends on, for example, a pore diameter of a precursor material (A) to be described later, and on an average particle diameter DC of the included catalytic material 20. The inner diameter DE of the enlarged diameter portion 12 has a size capable of including the catalytic material 20.
The carrier 10 is composed of a zeolite type compound. Examples of the zeolite type compound include silicate compounds such as zeolite (aluminosilicate), cation exchange zeolite and silicalite, zeolite analogous compounds such as aluminoborate, aluminoarsenate and germanate, and a phosphate-based zeolite analogues such as molybdenum phosphate. Among the compounds, the zeolite type compound is preferably a silicate compound.
The framework structure of the zeolite type compound is selected from FAU type (Y type or X type), MTW type, MFI type (ZSM-5), FER type (ferrierite), LTA type (A type), MWW type (MCM-22), MOR type (mordenite), LTL type (L type), BEA type (beta type) and the like, is preferably the MFI type, and is more preferably the ZSM-5. In the zeolite type compound, a plurality of pores having pore diameters corresponding to each of the framework structures are formed. For example, the maximum pore diameter of the MFI type is 0.636 nm (6.36 Å), and the average pore diameter is 0.560 nm (5.60 Å).
Hereinafter, the catalytic material 20 will be described in detail.
The catalytic material 20 is a metal fine particle. There is a case where the metal fine particle is held in the channel 11 in a state of a primary particle, and a case where the metal fine particle is held in the channel 11 in a state of a secondary particle formed by the aggregation of the primary particles. In any case, the average particle diameter DC of the metal fine particles is preferably greater than the average inner diameter DF of the channels 11, and is equal to or smaller than the inner diameter DE of the enlarged diameter portion 12 (DF<DC≤DE). Such a catalytic material 20 is preferably included in the enlarged diameter portion 12 in the channel 11, and the movement of the catalytic material 20 in the carrier 10 is restricted. Therefore, even when the catalytic material 20 has received an external force from the fluid, the movement of the catalytic material 20 in the carrier 10 is inhibited, and the catalyst structure can effectively prevent the catalytic materials 20, 20 and so on respectively included in the enlarged diameter portions 12, 12 and so on dispersed and arranged in the channel 11 of the carrier 10, from coming in contact with each other.
In addition, the average particle diameter DC of the metal fine particles is, in both cases of the primary particles and the secondary particles, preferably 0.08 nm to 30 nm, is more preferably 0.08 nm or more and less than 25 nm, is further preferably 0.4 nm to 11.0 nm, is particularly preferably 0.8 nm to 2.7 nm, and is most preferably 1.2 nm to 2.6 nm. In addition, a ratio (DC/DF) of the average particle diameter DC of the metal fine particles to the average inner diameter DF of the channels 11 is preferably 0.05 to 300, is more preferably 0.1 to 30, is further preferably 1.1 to 30, and is particularly preferably 1.4 to 3.6.
In addition, when the catalytic material 20 is the metal fine particle, it is preferable that the metal element (M) of the metal fine particle is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 2.5 mass % with respect to the catalyst structure 1, and it is more preferable that the metal element (M) of the metal fine particle is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 1.5 mass % with respect to the catalyst structure 1. For example, when the metal element (M) is Ni, the content (mass %) of the Ni element is expressed by {(mass of Ni element)/(mass of all elements in catalyst structure 1)}×100.
The metal fine particle may be composed of an unoxidized metal, and for example, may be composed of a single metal or a mixture of two or more metals. In the present specification, “metal” (of a material) forming the metal fine particle is a single metal containing one type of metal element (M) and a metal alloy containing two or more types of metal elements (M), and is a generic term of metal containing one or more metal elements.
Examples of such metals include rhodium (Rh), ruthenium (Ru), iridium (Ir), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), cerium (Ce), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al) and nickel (Ni), and it is preferable that the metal fine particle contains any one or more of the above described metals as a main component. In particular, it is preferable that the metal fine particle is a fine particle composed of at least one metal selected from the group consisting of rhodium (Rh), ruthenium (Ru), iridium (Ir), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni), from the viewpoint of catalytic activity, is more preferable that the metal fine particle is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of the rhodium (Rh), the ruthenium (Ru), the iridium (Ir) and the nickel (Ni), from the viewpoint of catalytic activity, and is particularly preferable that the metal fine particle is the nickel (Ni) among the above metals, from the viewpoint of balance between the price and the performance.
In addition, a ratio of silicon (Si) forming the carrier 10 to the metal element (M) forming the metal fine particle (atomic ratio Si/M) is preferably 10 to 1000, and is more preferably 50 to 200. When the above described ratio is greater than 1000, the activity is low and there is a possibility that an action of a catalytic material cannot be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, if the above described ratio is less than 10, the ratio of the metal fine particle becomes too large, and the strength of the carrier 10 tends to decrease. Note that the metal fine particle 20 referred herein means a fine particle existing or carried in the inside of the carrier 10, and does not include a metal fine particle attached to the outer surface of the carrier 10.
[Function of Catalyst Structure]
As described above, the catalyst structure 1 includes a carrier 10 having a porous structure, and at least one catalytic material 20 existing in the carrier. As the catalytic material 20 existing in the carrier 10 comes in contact with a fluid, the catalyst structure 1 exhibits a catalytic ability corresponding to the function of the catalytic material 20. Specifically, the fluid that have contacted an outer surface 10a of the catalyst structure 1 flows into the inside of the carrier 10 through a pore 11a formed in the outer surface 10a and is guided into the channel 11, moves through the channel 11, and exits to the outside of the catalyst structure 1 through another pore 11a. A catalytic reaction corresponding to the catalytic material 20 occurs as the fluid contacts the catalytic material 20 held in the channel 11, in a path in which the fluid moves through the channel 11. In addition, the catalyst structure 1 has a molecular sieving ability since the carrier has a porous structure.
Firstly, the molecular sieving ability of the catalyst structure 1 will be described, by taking a case where a fluid is a methane-containing gas and carbon dioxide as an example. The methane-containing gas refers to a mixed gas containing methane and a gas other than methane. In addition, the methane-containing gas and the carbon dioxide may be sequentially brought into contact with the catalyst structure 1, or may be brought into contact at the same time.
As is shown in
Among compounds produced by the reaction in the carrier 10, only a compound composed of a molecule having a size equal to or less than the pore diameter of the pore 11a is capable of exiting to the outside of the carrier 10 through the pore 11a, and is obtained as a reaction product. On the other hand, a compound incapable of exiting through the pore 11a to the outside of the carrier 10 can be exited to the outside of the carrier 10 after being converted into a compound composed of a molecule having a size capable of exiting to the outside of the carrier 10. Thus, by using the catalyst structure 1, a specific reaction product can be selectively obtained. In the present embodiment, specifically, methane reacts with carbon dioxide, and a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen is obtained as a reaction product.
In addition, as another example, when a fluid is a reforming feedstock containing methane as hydrocarbon, a compound (for example, methane and water) composed of a molecule having a size equal to or smaller than the inner diameter of the channel 11 can flow into the carrier 10 due to the above described molecular sieving ability, and a steam reforming reaction between methane and water proceeds. Note that the reforming feedstock is not limited to materials containing methane, but may be materials including hydrocarbons other than methane, and may be, for example, a mixed gas such as natural gas, or a mixed solution such as petroleum. Examples of the components contained in the reforming feedstock include straight-chain or branched type saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having approximately 1 to 16 carbon atoms such as methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane and decane, alicyclic saturated hydrocarbons such as cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and cyclooctane, monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and various hydrocarbons such as city gas, alcohols such as methanol, LPG, naphtha and kerosene.
In this case, methane reacts with water, and a reformed gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen is obtained as a reaction product.
In the catalyst structure 1, as is shown in
In the present embodiment, by using the catalyst structure 1, it is possible to produce a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen while using a methane-containing gas and carbon dioxide as feedstocks. This catalytic reaction is performed at a high temperature, for example, of 800° C. or higher, and since the catalytic material 20 exists in the carrier 10, it is less susceptible to heating. As a result, the decrease in the catalytic activity is inhibited, and the extension of the life of the catalyst structure 1 can be achieved.
In addition, by using the catalyst structure 1, it is possible to produce a reformed gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen by causing a reforming feedstock containing a hydrocarbon to react with water. This catalytic reaction is performed at a high temperature, for example, of 800° C. or higher, but since the catalytic material 20 exists in the carrier 10, it is less susceptible to heating. As a result, the decrease in the catalytic activity is inhibited, and the extension of the life of the catalyst structure 1 can be achieved.
In addition, the catalyst structure 1 can be preferably used in the case where a reformed gas containing carbon dioxide and hydrogen is produced by both the partial oxidation reaction and the steam reforming reaction that use a reforming feedstock, for example, containing methanol. In this reaction system, a combustion reaction occurs due to the partial oxidation reaction, and thus, there has been conventionally a problem that the catalytic material tends to easily aggregate depending on a temperature history of high temperature, even under the presence of trace oxygen. However, with to the catalyst structure 1, since the catalytic material 20 is included in the carrier 10, it is less susceptible to heating and/or oxidation. Because of the above reason, using the catalyst structure 1, it is possible to inhibit a decrease in the catalytic activity, and to prevent a decrease in the performance of a reformer that use the partial oxidation reaction and the steam reforming reaction together.
[Method for Producing Catalyst Structure]
(Step S1: Preparation Step)
As is shown in
Here, when the zeolite type compound forming the carrier of the catalyst structure is a silicate compound, it is preferable that the regular mesoporous substance is a compound formed of an Si—O framework. In the Si—O framework, pores having a pore diameter of 1 nm to 50 nm are regularly developed into one-dimensionally, two-dimensionally or three-dimensionally uniform sizes. Such a regular mesoporous substance can be obtained as various synthesized products depending on the synthesis conditions, and specific examples of the synthesized products include SBA-1, SBA-15, SBA-16, KIT-6, FSM-16 and MCM-41, and among the examples, the MCM-41 is preferable. The pore diameter of the SBA-1 is 10 nm to 30 nm, the pore diameter of the SBA-15 is 6 nm to 10 nm, the pore diameter of the SBA-16 is 6 nm, the pore diameter of the KIT-6 is 9 nm, the pore diameter of the FSM-16 is 3 nm to 5 nm, and the pore diameter of the MCM-41 is 1 nm to 10 nm. In addition, examples of such regular mesoporous substances include mesoporous silica, mesoporous aluminosilicate and mesoporous metallosilicate.
The precursor material (A) may be any one of a commercial product and a synthetic product. When the precursor material (A) is synthesized, a known method for synthesizing the regular mesoporous substance may be employed. For example, a mixed solution containing a feedstock containing constituent elements of the precursor material (A) and a molding agent for specifying a structure of the precursor material (A) are prepared, the pH is adjusted as needed, and hydrothermal treatment (hydrothermal synthesis) is performed. After the hydrothermal treatment, a precipitate (product) obtained by the hydrothermal treatment is collected (for example, filtrated), is washed and dried as needed, and is further baked to provide a precursor material (A) of a powdery regular mesoporous substance. Here, water, an organic solvent such as alcohol, a mixed solvent of water and the organic solvent, and the like, for example, can be used as a solvent of the mixed solution. In addition, the feedstock is selected depending on the type of the carrier, and includes, for example, a silica agent such as tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), fumed silica and quartz sand. In addition, various surface active agents, block copolymers and the like can be used as the molding agent, and it is preferable to select the molding agent depending on the type of the synthesized product of the regular mesoporous substance. For example, when producing the MCM-41, a surface active agent such as hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide is preferable. The hydrothermal treatment can be performed under treatment conditions, for example, of 80 to 800° C., 5 to 240 hours and 0 to 2000 kPa, in a closed container. The baking treatment can be performed under treatment conditions, for example, of 350 to 850° C. in the air, and 2 to 30 hours.
(Step S2: Impregnation Step)
Thereafter, the prepared precursor material (A) is impregnated with a metal-containing solution, and a precursor material (B) is obtained.
The metal-containing solution may be a solution containing a metal component (for example, metal ion) corresponding to a metal element (M) forming the metal fine particle, and can be prepared, for example, by dissolving a metal salt containing the metal element (M) in a solvent. Examples of such metal salts include chloride, hydroxide, oxide, sulfate and nitrate, and among the salts, the nitrate is preferable. As for the solvent, for example, water, an organic solvent such as alcohol, a mixed solvent of water and the organic solvent, or the like can be used.
A method for impregnating the precursor material (A) with the metal-containing solution is not limited in particular, but it is preferable, for example, to add the metal-containing solution little by little for a plurality of times while stirring the powdery precursor material (A) before a baking step. The baking step will be described later. In addition, from the viewpoint that the metal-containing solution more easily infiltrates into the insides of the pores of the precursor material (A), it is preferable that a surface active agent is previously added as an additive to the precursor material (A) before the metal-containing solution is added. It is considered that such an additive has a function of covering the outer surface of the precursor material (A) to inhibit the attachment of the metal-containing solution subsequently added to the outer surface of the precursor material (A), and that the metal-containing solution tends to easily infiltrate into the insides of the pores of the precursor material (A).
Examples of such additives include nonionic surface active agents such as polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers like polyoxyethylene oleyl ether, and polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ethers. It is considered that, since these surface active agents are large in a molecular size and cannot infiltrate into the pores of the precursor material (A), they do not attach to the interior of the pores, and do not prevent the metal-containing solution from infiltrating into the pores. As for a method for adding the nonionic surface active agent, it is preferable, for example, to add a nonionic surface active agent in an amount of 50 to 500 mass % with respect to the precursor material (A) before the baking step described below. When an amount of the nonionic surface active agent to be added with respect to the precursor material (A) is less than 50 mass %, the above described inhibiting effect is less likely to be exhibited, and when the nonionic surface active agent is added in an amount more than 500 mass % with respect to the precursor material (A), the viscosity excessively increases. Accordingly, both of the above cases are not preferable. Therefore, the amount of the nonionic surface active agent to be added with respect to the precursor material (A) is determined to be a value within the above described range.
In addition, it is preferable that the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A) is appropriately adjusted in consideration of the amount of the metal element (M) to be contained in the metal-containing solution with which the precursor material (A) is to be impregnated (in other words, amount of metal element (M) to be made to exist in precursor material (B)). For example, before the baking step described below, it is preferable to adjust the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A) so as to become 10 to 1000 in terms of a ratio (atomic ratio Si/M) of silicon (Si) forming the precursor material (A) with respect to the metal element (M) to be contained in the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A), and it is more preferable to adjust the addition amount to 50 to 200. For example, when a surface active agent is added to the precursor material (A) as an additive before the metal-containing solution is added to the precursor material (A), the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A) is set at 50 to 200 in terms of the atomic ratio Si/M, and due to the setting, the metal element (M) of the metal fine particle can be contained in an amount of 0.5 to 2.5 mass % with respect to the catalyst structure 1. In a state of the precursor material (B), the amount of the metal element (M) existing in the inside of the pores is approximately proportional to the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A), as long as various conditions are the same, such as a metal concentration in the metal-containing solution, the presence or absence of the above described additives, and in addition, the temperature and pressure. In addition, the amount of the metal element (M) existing in the precursor material (B) is in proportional relation with the amount of the metal element forming the metal fine particle existing in the carrier of the catalyst structure. Accordingly, by controlling the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A) within the above described range, it is possible to sufficiently impregnate the inside of the pores of the precursor material (A) with the metal-containing solution, and consequently to adjust the amount of metal fine particles to be made to exist in the carrier of the catalyst structure.
After the precursor material (A) has been impregnated with the metal-containing solution, cleaning treatment may be performed, as needed. As for a cleaning solution, water, an organic solvent such as alcohol, a mixed solvent of water and the organic solvent, or the like can be used. In addition, after having impregnated the precursor material (A) with the metal-containing solution, and performing cleaning treatment as needed, it is preferable to subject the resultant precursor material (A) further to drying treatment. Examples of the drying treatment include natural drying for approximately one night, and high-temperature drying at 150° C. or lower. When the baking treatment described below is performed in such a state that a water content contained in the metal-containing solution and a water content of the cleaning solution remain much in the precursor material (A), the framework structure formed as the regular mesoporous substance of the precursor material (A) may be destroyed, and accordingly it is preferable to sufficiently dry the precursor material (A).
(Step S3: Baking Step)
Thereafter, the precursor material (A) for obtaining a carrier having a porous structure composed of a zeolite type compound is impregnated with the metal-containing solution to obtain the precursor material (B), and the precursor material (B) is baked to obtain the precursor material (C).
It is preferable to perform the baking treatment under treatment conditions, for example, of 350 to 850° C. in the air and 2 to 30 hours. By such baking treatment, the metal component impregnated in the pores of the regular mesoporous substance causes crystal growth, and a metal fine particle is formed in the pore.
(Step S4: Hydrothermal Treatment Step)
Thereafter, a mixed solution is prepared by mixing the precursor material (C) and a structure directing agent, and the precursor material (C) obtained by baking the above described precursor material (B) is subjected to hydrothermal treatment to provide a catalyst structure.
The structure directing agent is a molding agent for specifying the framework structure of the carrier of the catalyst structure, and a surface active agent, for example, can be used. It is preferable to select the structure directing agent depending on the framework structure of the carrier of the catalyst structure, and, for example, a surface active agent such as tetramethyl ammonium bromide (TMABr), tetraethyl ammonium bromide (TEABr) and tetrapropyl ammonium bromide (TPABr) is preferable.
Mixing of the precursor material (C) and the structure directing agent may be carried out during the present hydrothermal treatment step, or before the hydrothermal treatment step. In addition, a method for preparing the above described mixed solution is not limited in particular. The precursor material (C), the structure directing agent and the solvent may be mixed at the same time, or the precursor material (C) and the structure directing agent may be dispersed in solvents to form individual solutions, respectively, and then the respective dispersion solutions may be mixed with each other. As for the solvent, for example, water, an organic solvent such as alcohol, a mixed solvent of water and the organic solvent, or the like can be used. In addition, it is preferable to adjust the pH of the mixed solution by using an acid or a base before performing the hydrothermal treatment.
The hydrothermal treatment may be performed by a known method, and it is preferable to perform the treatment under treatment conditions, for example, of 80 to 800° C., 5 to 240 hours and 0 to 2000 kPa in a closed container. In addition, it is preferable that the hydrothermal treatment is performed in a basic atmosphere.
The reaction mechanism here is not necessarily clear. However, by performing the hydrothermal treatment using the precursor material (C) as a feedstock, the framework structure formed as the regular mesoporous substance of the precursor material (C) gradually collapses, but a new framework structure (porous structure) as the carrier of the catalyst structure is formed by an action of the structure directing agent, while the position of the metal fine particle inside the pore of the precursor material (C) is almost kept. The catalyst structure obtained in this manner has a carrier having a porous structure, and a metal fine particle existing in the carrier. Furthermore, due to the porous structure, the carrier has a channel allowing a plurality of pores to communicate with each other, and at least a part of the metal fine particle exists in the channel of the carrier.
In addition, in the present embodiment, in the above described hydrothermal treatment step, the mixed solution is prepared by mixing the precursor material (C) and the structure directing agent, and the precursor material (C) is subjected to the hydrothermal treatment. However, it is not limited thereto, and the precursor material (C) may be subjected to the hydrothermal treatment without mixing the precursor material (C) with the structure directing agent.
After the precipitate (catalyst structure) obtained after the hydrothermal treatment has been collected (for example, filtrated), it is preferable that the collected precipitate is subjected to cleaning treatment, drying treatment and baking treatment as needed. As for the cleaning solution, water, an organic solvent such as alcohol, a mixed solvent of water and the organic solvent, or the like can be used. Examples of the drying treatment include natural drying for approximately one night, and high-temperature drying at 150° C. or lower. If the baking treatment is performed with much water remaining in the precipitate, the framework structure as the carrier of the catalyst structure may break, and thus, it is preferable to sufficiently dry the precipitate. In addition, the baking treatment can be performed under treatment conditions of, for example, 350 to 850° C. in the air, and 2 to 30 hours. By such baking treatment, the structure directing agent having attached to the catalyst structure is burned off. In addition, depending on the purpose of use, the catalyst structure can be used as it is, without subjecting the precipitate after collection to the baking treatment. For example, when the environment for the catalyst structure to be used is a high-temperature environment of an oxidizing atmosphere, the structure directing agent is burned off by being exposed to the use environment for a certain period of time. In this case, a catalyst structure similar to the case where the precipitate has been subjected to the baking treatment can be obtained, and accordingly it is not necessary to perform the baking treatment.
The above described production method is one example in the case where the metal element (M) contained in the metal-containing solution with which the precursor material (A) is to be impregnated is a metal species resistant to oxidation (for example, noble metal).
In a case where the metal element (M) contained in the metal-containing solution with which the precursor material (A) is to be impregnated is a metal species that tends to be easily oxidized (for example, Fe, Co, Ni or the like), it is preferable to subject the hydrothermally treated precursor material (C), after the above described hydrothermal treatment step, to reduction treatment (step S5: reduction treatment step). In a case where the metal element (M) contained in the metal-containing solution is a metal species that that tends to be easily oxidized, the metal component is oxidized by the heat treatments in the steps (steps S3 to S4) after the impregnation treatment (step S2). Because of the above reason, the carrier formed in the hydrothermal treatment step (step S4) has a metal oxide fine particle existing therein. Because of the above reason, in order to obtain a catalyst structure having a metal fine particle existing in the carrier, after the hydrothermal treatment, it is desirable to subject the collected precipitate to the baking treatment, and further to subject the resultant precipitate to reduction treatment under an atmosphere of a reducing gas such as a hydrogen gas. By being subjected to the reduction treatment, the metal oxide fine particle existing in the carrier is reduced, and the metal fine particle corresponding to the metal element (M) forming the metal oxide fine particle is formed. As a result, a catalyst structure having the metal fine particle existing in the carrier is obtained. Such reduction treatment may be performed as needed. For example, when an environment where the catalyst structure is used is a reductive atmosphere, the metal oxide fine particle is reduced by being exposed to a use environment for a certain period of time. In this case, a catalyst structure similar to the case where the carrier has been subjected to the reduction treatment can be obtained, and thus, it is not necessary to perform the reduction treatment.
[Modified Example of Catalyst Structure 1]
The catalyst structure 1 of
The catalytic material 30 is a substance exhibiting one or a plurality of catalytic abilities. The catalytic ability of the other catalytic material 30 may be the same as or different from the catalytic ability of the catalytic material 20. In addition, when both of the catalytic materials 20 and 30 are substances having the same catalytic ability, a material of the other catalytic material 30 may be the same as or different from a material of the catalytic material 20. According to the present configuration, it is possible to increase the content of the catalytic material held by the catalyst structure 2, and to further promote the catalytic activity of the catalytic material.
In this case, it is preferable that the content of the catalytic material 20 existing in the carrier 10 is greater than the content of the other catalytic material 30 held at the outer surface 10a of the carrier 10. Due to the above configuration, the catalytic ability of the catalytic material 20 held in the inside of the carrier 10 becomes dominant, and the catalytic ability of the catalytic material is stably exhibited.
In the above description, the catalyst structure according to the embodiment of the present disclosure has been described, but the present disclosure is not limited to the above embodiment, and can be modified and changed in various ways on the basis of the technological idea of the present disclosure.
For example, a synthesis gas producing apparatus equipped with the above described catalyst structure may be provided. Examples of a producing apparatus include a CO2 reforming plant by dry reforming. The catalyst structure can be used for a catalytic reaction using such a synthesis gas producing apparatus.
Specifically, it is possible to synthesize the synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen by supplying carbon dioxide and methane to the above described catalyst structure, and it is possible to show an effect similar to the above description, for example, by using the above described catalyst structure in the synthesis gas producing apparatus, and subjecting carbon dioxide and methane to synthesis treatment in the above described synthesis gas producing apparatus.
In addition, a reforming apparatus equipped with the above described catalyst structure may be provided. Specifically, examples of the reforming apparatus include a fuel reforming apparatus using a steam reforming reaction, a reforming apparatus of a type targeting electric vehicles and portable fuel cell power generators and using the partial oxidation reaction and the steam reforming reaction together, and a stationary fuel cell such as a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The above described catalyst structure can be used for a catalytic reaction using such apparatuses.
Specifically, it is possible to synthesize a reformed gas containing hydrogen by supplying a hydrocarbon (for example, reforming feedstock containing hydrocarbon) and steam to the above described catalyst structure, and is possible to show an effect similar to the above description, for example, by using the above described catalyst structure in the above described reforming apparatus, and subjecting the reforming feedstock containing the hydrocarbon to reforming treatment in the above described reforming apparatus.
[Synthesis of Precursor Material (A)]
A mixed aqueous solution was prepared by mixing a silica agent (tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), made by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) and a surface active agent functioning as a molding agent, appropriately adjusting the pH, and subjecting the resultant solution to hydrothermal treatment at 80 to 350° C. for 100 hours in a closed container. After the hydrothermal treatment, the produced precipitate was filtered off, was cleaned with water and ethanol, and was further baked at 600° C. for 24 hours in the air, and precursor materials (A) having the types and the pore diameters shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2 were obtained. The following surface active agents were used depending on the type of the precursor material (A) (“type of precursor material (A): surface active agent”).
[Preparation of Precursor Materials (B) and (C)]
Thereafter, depending on the metal element (M) forming the metal fine particle of the type shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2, a metal salt containing the metal element (M) was dissolved in water to prepare a metal-containing aqueous solution. The following metal salts were used depending on the type of the metal fine particle (“metal fine particle: metal salt”).
Thereafter, the precursor material (B) was obtained by adding a metal-containing aqueous solution to the powdery precursor material (A) little by little for a plurality of times, and drying the resultant precursor material at room temperature (20° C.±10° C.) for 12 hours or longer.
In the case where the conditions for the presence or absence of additives shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2 were “present”, the precursor material (A) before the metal-containing aqueous solution was added was subjected to a pretreatment of adding an aqueous solution of polyoxyethylene (15) oleyl ether (NIKKOL BO-15V, made by Nikko Chemicals Co., Ltd.) as an additive, and then the metal-containing aqueous solution was added to the precursor material (A) as described above. When the condition of the presence or absence of the additive was “absent”, the pretreatment by the above described additive was not performed.
In addition, the addition amount of the metal-containing aqueous solution to be added to the precursor material (A) was adjusted so that a numeric value in terms of a ratio (atomic ratio Si/M) of silicon (Si) forming the precursor material (A) to the metal element (M) contained in the metal-containing aqueous solution became each value in Tables 1-1 to 8-2.
Thereafter, a precursor material (C) was obtained by baking the precursor material (B) impregnated with the metal-containing aqueous solution obtained as described above, at 600° C. for 24 hours in the air.
A mixed aqueous solution was prepared by mixing the precursor material (C) obtained as described above and the structure directing agent shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2, and was subjected to hydrothermal treatment in a closed container on conditions of 80 to 350° C., and a pH and a time period shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2. After the hydrothermal treatment, the produced precipitate was filtered off, washed, dried at 100° C. for 12 hours or longer, and further baked at 600° C. for 24 hours in the air. In Examples 1 to 384, after the baking treatment, the baked product was collected and subjected to reduction treatment at 500° C. for 60 minutes under a flow of hydrogen gas, and consequently, catalyst structures having carriers and the metal fine particles shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2 were obtained.
In Comparative Example 1, a catalyst structure having cobalt fine particles attached on the outer surface of silicalite functioning as the carrier, as the catalytic material, by mixing a cobalt oxide powder (II and III) (made by Sigma-Aldrich Japan) having an average particle diameter of 50 nm or less in MFI type silicalite, and subjecting the mixture to hydrogen reduction treatment in a similar way to those in the Examples. The MFI type silicalite was synthesized according to a method similar to those in Examples 52 to 57, except for the step of adding metal.
In Comparative Example 2, an MFI type silicalite was synthesized in a similar method to that in Comparative Example 1, except that the step of attaching the cobalt fine particles was omitted.
In Comparative Example 3, nickel fine particles were carried on Al2O3 by an impregnation method.
Specifically, Ni/Al2O3 was obtained by dissolving 0.2477 g of Ni(NO3)/6H2O (made by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) in 5 g of distilled water, mixing the solution with 5 g of Al2O3 (made by Wako), heating the mixture at 800° C. for 2 hours, and subjecting the resultant mixture to hydrogen reduction treatment in a similar way to that in the Example.
[Evaluation]
Concerning the catalyst structures of Examples 1 to 384 and the silicalite of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, various characteristics were evaluated under the following conditions.
[A-1] Cross Section Observation
Concerning the catalyst structures of Examples 1 to 384 and the silicalite of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, observation samples were prepared with a pulverization method, and the respective cross sections were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (TITAN G2, made by FEI).
As a result, it was confirmed that in the catalyst structures of the above described Examples, the catalytic material exists in the inside of the carrier composed of silicalite or zeolite, and was held by the carrier. On the other hand, as for the silica lite of Comparative Example 1, the metal fine particles attached only to the outer surface of the carrier, and did not exist in the inside of the carrier.
In addition, concerning the catalyst structure where metal is iron fine particle (Fe), in the above described Examples, the cross section was cut out by FIB (focused ion beam) processing, and elements on a cross section were analyzed using SEM (SU8020, made by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation), and EDX (X-Max, made by Horiba, Ltd.). As a result, Fe element was detected from the inside of the carrier.
From the results of the cross section observation by TEM and SEM/EDX, it was confirmed that the iron fine particle exists in the inside of the carrier.
[B-1] Average Inner Diameter of Channel in Carrier and Average Particle Diameter of Catalytic Material
In the TEM image photographed in the cross section observation performed in the above described evaluation [A-1], 500 channels in the carrier were arbitrarily selected, and respective major and minor axes were measured. From average values thereof, respective inner diameters were calculated (N=500), and further, an average value of the inner diameters was determined and taken as an average inner diameter DF of the channels in the carrier. In addition, also for the catalytic material, similarly, 500 catalytic materials were arbitrarily selected in the above described TEM image, the respective particle diameters were measured (N=500), and an average value was determined and taken as an average particle diameter DC of the catalytic materials. The results are shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2.
In addition, in order to check the average particle diameter and dispersed state of the catalytic material, an analysis was performed using SAXS (small angle X-ray scattering). Measurement by SAXS was performed using beam line BL19B2 of Spring-8. The obtained SAXS data was subjected to fitting with a spherical model by the Guinier approximation method, and the particle diameter was calculated. The particle diameter was measured for a catalyst structure where the metal is an iron fine particle. In addition, as a comparison object, iron fine particles (made by Wako) of a commercial product were observed and measured with SEM.
As a result, in the commercial product, iron fine particles having various sizes exist at random in a range of particle diameters of approximately 50 nm to 400 nm, but on the other hand, in the catalyst structure of each of the Examples having an average particle diameter of 1.2 nm to 2.0 nm determined from the TEM images, a scattering peak was detected for the particle diameters of 10 nm or less also in the SAXS measurement result. From the measurement results of SAXS and the measurement results of the cross sections by SEM/EDX, it was found that the catalytic materials having particle diameters of 10 nm or less exist in a uniform and very highly dispersed state in the inside of the carrier.
[C-1] Relationship Between Addition Amount of Metal-Containing Solution and Amount of Metal Included in Inside of Carrier
Catalyst structures including the metal fine particles in the insides of the carriers were prepared with the addition amount of atomic ratios being Si/M=50, 100, 200 and 1000 (M=Co, Ni, Fe and Pt), and then amounts (mass %) of the metals included in the insides of the carriers of the catalyst structures prepared in the above described addition amounts were measured. In the present measurement, the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000 were prepared by adjusting the addition amount of the metal-containing solution in a similar method to that of the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000 in Examples 1 to 384, respectively, and the catalyst structure having an atomic ratio Si/M=50 was prepared in a similar method to that of the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000, except that the addition amount of the metal-containing solution was made to be different.
The amount of metal was quantified by ICP (High Frequency Inductively Coupled Plasma) alone or by a combination of ICP and XRF (fluorescent X-ray analysis). The XRF (Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer “SEA 1200 VX”, made by Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation) was performed in a vacuum atmosphere on such a condition that an accelerating voltage was 15 kV (using Cr filter) or an accelerating voltage was 50 kV (using Pb filter).
The XRF is a method of calculating the abundance of metal by fluorescence intensity, and it is not possible to calculate a quantitative value (in terms of mass %) by the XRF alone. Then, the amount of metal in the catalyst structure whereto metal is added at a ratio of Si/M=100 was quantified by ICP analysis, and the amount of metal in the catalyst structure whereto metal is added at a ratio of Si/M=50 and less than 100 was determined on the basis of the XRF measurement result and the ICP measurement result.
As a result, it was confirmed that the amount of the metal included in the catalyst structure has increased along with an increase of the addition amount of the metal-containing solution, at least within such a range that the atomic ratio Si/M is 50 to 1000.
[D-1] Performance Evaluation
Concerning the catalyst structures of Examples 1 to 384 and the silicalite of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the catalytic ability of the catalytic material was evaluated. The results are shown in Tables 1-1 to 8-2.
(1-1) Catalytic Activity
The catalytic activity was evaluated under the following conditions.
Firstly, 0.2 g of the catalyst structure was filled in a normal pressure flow type reaction apparatus, and using nitrogen gas (N2) as a carrier gas (5 ml/min), a decomposition reaction of butylbenzene (model substance of heavy oil) was performed at 400° C. for 2 hours.
After the reaction has finished, the collected produced gas and produced liquid were subjected to a component analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). TRACE 1310 GC (made by Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., detector: thermal conductivity detector) was used as an analysis apparatus for the produced gas, and TRACE DSQ (made by Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., detector: mass detector, and ionization method: EI (ion source temperature of 250° C., MS transfer line temperature of 320° C., and detector: thermal conductivity detector)) was used as the analysis apparatus for the produced liquid.
Furthermore, on the basis of the result of the above described component analysis, yields (mol %) of compounds having molecular weights less than that of butylbenzene (specifically, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, styrene, cumene, methane, ethane, ethylene, propane, propylene, butane, butene and the like) were determined. The yields of the above described compounds were calculated as a percentage (mol %) of the total amount (mol) of substance quantities of the compounds having molecular weights less than that of butylbenzene contained in the produced liquid, with respect to the substance quantity (mol) of butylbenzene before the start of the reaction.
In the present example, the Example was determined to be excellent in the catalytic activity (resolution) when the yield of the compounds having molecular weights less than that of the butylbenzene contained in the produced liquid was 40 mol % or more, and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to have good catalytic activity when the yield was 25 mol % or more and less than 40 mol %, and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good catalytic activity but to have the catalytic activity in a passing level (acceptable) when the yield was 10 mol % or more and less than 25 mol %, and expressed by “Fair”, and the Example was determined to be inferior (unacceptable) in the catalytic activity when the yield was less than 10 mol %, and expressed as “Poor”.
(2-1) Durability (Life)
Durability was evaluated under the following conditions.
Firstly, the catalyst structure used in the evaluation (1-1) was collected, and was heated at 650° C. for 12 hours, and a catalyst structure after heating was prepared. Thereafter, using the obtained catalyst structure after heating, a decomposition reaction of butylbenzene (model substance of heavy oil) was performed according to a method similar to that in the evaluation (1-1), and component analyses of a produced gas and a produced liquid were performed according to methods similar to those in the above described evaluation (1-1).
Yields (mol %) of compounds having molecular weights less than that of butylbenzene were determined according to a method similar to that in the evaluation (1), on the basis of the obtained analysis results. Furthermore, it was compared how much the yield of the above described compounds by the catalyst structure after heating was kept as compared to the yield (yield determined in the evaluation (1)) of the above described compounds by the catalyst structure before heating. Specifically, a percentage (%) of the yield (yield determined in evaluation (2-1)) of the above described compounds by the above described catalyst structure after heating, with respect to the yield (yield determined in evaluation (1-1)) of the above described compounds by the catalyst structure before heating was calculated.
In the present example, the Example was determined to be excellent in the durability (heat resistance) when the yield of the above described compounds by the catalyst structure after heating (yield determined in evaluation (2-1)) was kept at 80% or more as compared to the yield of the above described compounds by the catalyst structure before heating (yield determined in evaluation (1-1)), and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to have good durability (heat resistance) when the yield was kept at 60% or more and less than 80%, and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good durability (heat resistance) but to have durability in a passing level (acceptable) when the yield was kept at 40% or more and less than 60%, and expressed as “Fair”, and the Example was determined to be inferior (unacceptable) in the durability (heat resistance) when the yield decreased to less than 40%, and expressed as “Poor”.
For Comparative Examples 1 and 2, performance evaluations similar to those in the above described evaluations (1-1) and (2-1) were also performed. Comparative Example 2 is a carrier itself, and does not have a catalytic material. Because of the above reason, in the above described performance evaluation, only the carrier of Comparative Example 2 was filled instead of the catalyst structure. The result is shown in Tables 8-1 and 8-2.
As is clear from Tables 1-1 to 8-2, it was found that the catalyst structures (Examples 1 to 384) for which cross sectional observation was carried out and confirmed that the catalytic material is held in the inside of the carrier exhibit excellent catalytic activity in the decomposition reaction of butylbenzene and is also excellent in the durability as the catalyst as compared to the catalyst structure (Comparative Example 1) wherein the catalytic material only attaches to the outer surface of the carrier, or the carrier itself (Comparative Example 2) that does not have the catalytic material at all.
Further, a relationship between the amount (mass %) of metal included in the inside of the carrier of the catalyst structure measured in the above described evaluation [C], and the yield (mol %) of the compounds having molecular weights less than that of butylbenzene contained in the produced liquid was evaluated. The evaluation method was the same method as the above described evaluation method performed in the “(1-1) catalytic activity” in “performance evaluation” of “D-1”.
As a result, it was found that in each of the Examples, when the addition amount of the metal-containing solution to be added to the precursor material (A) is 50 to 200 in terms of the atomic ratio Si/M (M=Fe) (content of metal fine particles with respect to catalyst structure was 0.5 to 2.5 mass %), the yield of the compounds having the molecular weights less than that of the butylbenzene contained in the produced liquid becomes 32 mol % or more, and the catalytic activity in the decomposition reaction of the butylbenzene is in an acceptable level or higher.
On the other hand, the catalyst structure of Comparative Example 1 having the catalytic material attached only to the outer surface of the carrier is improved in the catalytic activity in the decomposition reaction of the butylbenzene as compared to the carrier itself in Comparative Example 2 having no catalytic material in itself, but the durability of the catalyst was inferior as compared to those of the catalyst structures in Examples 1 to 384.
In addition, the carrier itself having no catalytic material in itself in Comparative Example 2 did not show almost any catalytic activity in the decomposition reaction of the butylbenzene, and both of the catalytic activity and the durability were inferior as compared to those of the catalyst structures of Examples 1 to 384.
Thereafter, the catalytic activity in dry reforming was evaluated. A normal pressure flow type reaction apparatus was filled with 50 mg of each of the catalyst structures (Examples 97 to 192) having the Ni fine particle as the catalytic material and Comparative Example 3, CO2 (7 ml/minute) and CH4 (7 ml/minute) were supplied to the reaction apparatus, and dry reforming was performed while the resultant substance was heated at 100 to 900° C. A single micro reactor (Rx-3050SR, made by Frontier Laboratories, Ltd.) was used as the normal pressure flow type reaction apparatus. The product was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). TRACE 1310 GC (made by Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., detector: thermal conductivity detector) was used as an analysis apparatus for the produced gas.
As for the catalytic activity in the dry reforming, the Example was determined to be excellent in the catalytic activity when the production of the carbon monoxide started at 600° C. or lower, and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to have good catalytic activity when the production started at higher than 600° C. and lower than 700° C., and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good catalytic activity but to have the catalytic activity in a passing level (acceptable) when the production started at 700° C. or higher and lower than 800° C., and expressed by “Fair”, and, the Example was determined to be inferior in the catalytic activity (unacceptable) when the production started at 800° C. or higher and lower than 900° C., or when the reaction did not proceed, and expressed by “Poor”. The results are shown in Tables 9-1 to 10-2.
As is clear from Tables 9-1 to 10-2, it was found that when the catalytic material is the Ni fine particle, the catalytic activity in the dry reforming is high. In addition, it is disclosed that in the dry reforming, metals in Groups 8, 9 and 10 excluding Os (Rh, Ru, Ni, Pt, Pd, Ir, Co and Fe) have high activity, and the main order of the activity is Rh, Ru>Ir>Ni, Pt, Pd (Advanced Technology of Methane Chemical Conversion (CMC Publishing Co., Ltd., in 2008). Therefore, it is assumed that at least Rh, Ru, Ir, Pt and Pd showing the activity equal to or higher than that of Ni, and particularly, Rh, Ru and Ir are also excellent in the catalytic activity in the dry reforming.
From the above description, it is possible to produce a synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen, by using the catalyst structure according to the present example for a reaction between a methane-containing gas and carbon dioxide. In addition, also in a case where the catalyst structure is used for producing the synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen, it is confirmed that the catalytic activity and the durability are adequate similarly to those in the above described case.
Catalyst structures having carriers and metal fine particles of the catalytic material shown in Tables 11-1 to 18-2 were obtained in similar ways to those in Examples 1 to 384, except that the metal salts to be dissolved in the metal-containing solution were replaced with the following substances, in production of the precursor materials (B) and (C).
[Evaluation]
For the catalyst structures of Examples 385 to 768, various characteristics were evaluated under the following conditions.
[A-2] Cross Section Observation
For the catalyst structures of Examples 385 to 768, observation samples were prepared with a pulverization method, and the respective cross sections were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (TITAN G2, made by FEI).
As a result, it was confirmed that in the catalyst structures of the above described Examples, the catalytic material exists in the inside of the carrier composed of silicalite or zeolite, and was held by the carrier.
In addition, concerning the catalyst structure where the metal is a Ni fine particle, in the above described Examples, the cross section was cut out by FIB (focused ion beam) processing, and elements on a cross section was analyzed using SEM (SU8020, made by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation), and EDX (X-Max, made by Horiba, Ltd.). As a result, Ni element was detected from the inside of the carrier.
From the results of the above described cross section observations by TEM and SEM/EDX, it was confirmed that the Ni fine particle exists in the inside of the carrier.
[B-2] Average Inner Diameter of Channel of Carrier and Average Particle Diameter of Catalytic Material
In the TEM image photographed in the cross section observation performed in the above described evaluation [A-2], 500 channels in the carrier were arbitrarily selected, and the respective major and minor axes were measured. From average values thereof, respective inner diameters were calculated (N=500), and further, an average value of the inner diameters was determined and taken as an average inner diameter DF of the channels in the carrier. In addition, also for the catalytic material, similarly, 500 catalytic materials were arbitrarily selected in the above described TEM image, the respective particle diameters were measured (N=500), and an average value was taken as an average particle diameter DC of the catalytic materials. The results are shown in Tables 11-1 to 18-2.
In addition, in order to check the average particle diameter and dispersed state of the catalytic material, an analysis was performed using SAXS (small angle X-ray scattering). Measurement by SAXS was performed using beam line BL19B2 of Spring-8. The obtained SAXS data was subjected to fitting according to a spherical model by the Guinier approximation method, and the particle diameter was calculated. The particle diameter was measured for a catalyst structure where the metal is the Ni fine particle. In addition, as a comparison object, iron fine particles (made by Wako) of a commercial product were observed and measured with SEM.
As a result, in the commercial product, iron fine particles having various sizes exist at random in a range of particle diameters of approximately 50 nm to 400 nm, but on the other hand, in the catalyst structure of each of the Examples having an average particle diameter of 1.2 nm to 2.0 nm determined from the TEM images, a scattering peak was detected for the particle diameters of 10 nm or less also in the SAXS measurement result. From the measurement results of SAXS and the measurement results of the cross sections by SEM/EDX, it was found that the catalytic materials having particle diameters of 10 nm or less exist in a uniform and very highly dispersed state in the inside of the carrier.
[C-2] Relationship Between Addition Amount of Metal-Containing Solution and Amount of Metal Included in Inside of Carrier
Catalyst structures including the metal fine particles in the insides of the carriers were prepared with the addition amount of atomic ratios being Si/M=50, 100, 200 and 1000 (M=Ru, Ni, Ir and Rh) and then amounts (mass %) of the metals included in the insides of the carriers of the catalyst structures prepared in the above described addition amounts were measured. In the present measurement, the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000 were prepared by adjusting the addition amount of the metal-containing solution in a similar method to that of the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000 in Examples 385 to 768, respectively, and the catalyst structure having an atomic ratio Si/M=50 was prepared in a similar method to that of the catalyst structures having atomic ratios Si/M=100, 200 and 1000, except that the addition amount of the metal-containing solution was made to be different.
The amount of metal was quantified by ICP (High Frequency Inductively Coupled Plasma) alone or by a combination of ICP and XRF (fluorescent X-ray analysis). The XRF (Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer “SEA 1200 VX”, made by S.S.I. Nano Technology Inc.) was performed in a vacuum atmosphere on such a condition that an accelerating voltage was 15 kV (using Cr filter) or an accelerating voltage was 50 kV (using Pb filter).
The XRF is a method of calculating the abundance of metal by fluorescence intensity, and it is not possible to calculate a quantitative value (in terms of mass %) by the XRF alone. Then, the amount of metal in the catalyst structure whereto metal is added at a ratio of Si/M=100 was quantified by ICP analysis, and the amount of metal in the catalyst structure whereto metal is added at a ratio of Si/M=50 and less than 100 was determined on the basis of the XRF measurement result and the ICP measurement result.
As a result, it was confirmed that the amount of the metal included in the catalyst structure has increased along an increase of the addition amount of the metal-containing solution, at least within such a range that the atomic ratio Si/M is 50 to 1000.
[D-2] Performance Evaluation
Concerning the catalyst structures of Examples 385 to 768 and the silicalite of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the catalytic ability of the catalytic material was evaluated under the following conditions. The results are shown in Tables 11-1 to 18-2.
(1-2) Catalytic activity
The catalytic activity was evaluated under the following conditions.
Firstly, 0.2 g of the catalyst structure was filled in a normal pressure flow type reaction apparatus, using steam as a carrier gas (5 ml/min), kerosene according to JIS No. 1 was used as a reforming feedstock, and a steam reforming reaction was performed at 580° C. for 2 hours.
After the reaction has finished, the collected produced gas was subjected to a component analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). TRACE 1310 GC (made by Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., detector: thermal conductivity detector) was used as an analysis apparatus for the produced gas.
On the basis of the results of the above described component analysis, the conversion ratio (%) to C1 (CO, CO2 and CH4) was calculated. The C1 conversion ratio was determined by the calculation according to the following expression (1).
C1 conversion ratio (%)=(A/B)×100 (1)
In the above described expression (1), A represents the total value of the molar flow rate of CO, the molar flow rate of CO2 and the molar flow rate of CH4, at an outlet of the reaction vessel and B represents a molar flow rate of carbon in the kerosene at an inlet side of the reaction vessel.
In the present example, the Example was determined to be excellent in the catalytic activity when the C1 conversion ratio was 40% or more, and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to have good catalytic activity when the Cl conversion ratio was 30% or more and less than 40%, and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good catalytic activity but to have catalytic activity in a passing level (acceptable) when the C1 conversion ratio was 20% or more and less than 30%, and expressed by “Fair”, and the Example was determined to be inferior (unacceptable) in the catalytic activity when the C1 conversion ratio was less than 20%, and expressed as “Poor”.
(2-2) Durability (Life)
Durability was evaluated under the following conditions.
Firstly, the catalyst structure used in the above described evaluation (1-2) was collected, and was heated at 650° C. for 12 hours, and a catalyst structure after heating was prepared. Thereafter, using the obtained catalyst structure after heating, the steam reforming reaction of kerosene according to JIS No. 1 determined to be a reforming feedstock was performed according to a method similar to that in the above described evaluation (1-2), and a component analysis of a produced gas was performed with a method similar to that in the above described evaluation (1-2).
The C1 conversion ratio (%) was determined according to a method similar to that in the above described evaluation (1-2), on the basis of the obtained analysis results. Furthermore, it was compared how much the C1 conversion ratio caused by the catalyst structure after heating was kept as compared to the C1 conversion ratio caused by the catalyst structure before heating (C1 conversion ratio determined in above described evaluation (1-2)). Specifically, a percentage (%) of the C1 conversion ratio caused by the above described catalyst structure after heating (C1 conversion ratio determined by present evaluation (2-2)) with respect to the C1 conversion ratio caused by the catalyst structure before heating (C1 conversion ratio determined in above described evaluation (1-2)) was calculated.
In the present example, the Example was determined to be excellent in durability (heat resistance) when the C1 conversion ratio by the catalyst structure after heating (C1 conversion ratio determined in present evaluation (2-2)) was kept at 80% or more as compared to the C1 conversion ratio by the catalyst structure before heating (C1 conversion ratio determined in above described evaluation (1-2)), and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to be good in durability (heat resistance) when the C1 conversion ratio was kept at 60% or more and less than 80%, and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good durability (heat resistance) but to have durability in a passing level (acceptable) when the Cl conversion ratio was kept at 40% or more and less than 60%, and expressed as “Fair”, and the Example was determined to be inferior (unacceptable) in durability (heat resistance) when the C1 conversion ratio decreased to less than 40%, and expressed as “Poor”.
For Comparative Examples 1 and 2, performance evaluations similar to the above described evaluations (1-2) and (2-2) were also performed. The results are shown in Tables 18-1 and 18-2.
As is clear from Tables 11-1 to 18-2, it was found that the catalyst structures (Examples 385 to 768) for which observation of the cross section was carried out and confirmed that the catalytic material is held in the inside of the carrier exhibits excellent catalytic activity in the steam reforming reaction of the kerosene according to JIS No. 1 determined to be a reforming feedstock and is excellent also in the durability as the catalyst, as compared to the catalyst structure (Comparative Example 1) wherein the catalytic material only attaches to the outer surface of the carrier, or the carrier itself (Comparative Example 2) that does not have the catalytic material at all.
On the other hand, the catalyst structure of Comparative Example 1 having the catalytic material attached only to the outer surface of the carrier is improved in the catalytic activity in the steam reforming reaction of kerosene according to JIS No. 1 determined to be a reforming feedstock, as compared to the carrier itself in Comparative Example 2 having no catalytic material in itself, but the durability of the catalyst was inferior as compared to those of the catalyst structures in Examples 385 to 768.
In addition, the carrier itself having no catalytic material in itself in Comparative Example 2 did not show almost any catalytic activity in the steam reforming reaction of the kerosene according to JIS No. 1 determined to be a reforming feedstock, and both of the catalytic activity and the durability were inferior as compared to those of the catalyst structures of Examples 385 to 768.
Thereafter, in addition to the above described evaluation of the case where hydrogen was produced using a petroleum-based hydrocarbon, the catalytic activity of a case where a natural gas was subjected to steam reforming was evaluated. To a normal pressure flow reaction apparatus, 50 mg of the catalyst structures (Example 481 to 576) having the Ni fine particle as the catalytic material were filled, and reduction treatment was performed by a hydrogen gas at 500° C. for 1 hour before the reaction starts.
Thereafter, methane gas (6 ml/min) and pure water (5 μl/min) were supplied and N2 working as a carrier gas was supplied to the apparatus with 10 ml/min, respectively, and the steam reforming reaction was performed while the apparatus heated the substances at 100 to 900° C. A single micro reactor (Rx-3050SR, made by Frontier Laboratory Co., Ltd.) was used as the normal pressure flow type reaction apparatus. The product was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). TRACE 1310 GC (made by Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., detector: thermal conductivity detector) was used as an analysis apparatus for the produced gas.
As for the catalytic activity in the steam reforming of the methane gas, the Example was determined to be excellent in the catalytic activity when the production of the carbon monoxide started at 600° C. or lower, and expressed as “Excellent”, the Example was determined to have good catalytic activity when the production started at higher than 600° C. and lower than 700° C., and expressed as “Good”, the Example was determined not to have good catalytic activity but to have the catalytic activity in a passing level (acceptable) when the production started at 700° C. or higher and lower than 800° C., and expressed as “Fair”, and the Example was determined to be inferior in the catalytic activity (unacceptable) when the production started at 800° C. or higher and lower than 900° C., or when the reaction did not proceed, and expressed as “Poor”. The results are shown in Tables 19-1 to 20-2.
As is clear from Tables 19-1 to 20-2, it was found that when the catalytic material is the Ni fine particles, the catalytic activity in the steam reforming of the methane gas is high. In addition, it is disclosed that in the steam reforming, metals in Groups 8, 9 and 10 excluding Os (Rh, Ru, Ni, Pt, Pd, Ir, Co and Fe) have high activity, and the main order of the activity is Rh, Ru>Ir>Ni, Pt, Pd. Therefore, it is assumed that at least Rh, Ru, Ir, Pt and Pd showing the activity equal to or higher than that of Ni, and particularly, Rh, Ru and Ir are also excellent in the catalytic activity in the steam reforming.
From the above description, it is possible to efficiently produce a reformed gas containing hydrogen by using the catalyst structure according to the present example, for a steam reforming reaction using a reforming feedstock such as a natural gas containing a hydrocarbon like methane, and for a partial oxidation reaction and the steam reforming reaction using a reforming feedstock containing a hydrocarbon such as methanol. Specifically, the catalyst structure according to the present example can exhibit adequate catalytic activity and durability similarly to the above description, in the steam reforming reaction (and in combined reaction with partial oxidation reaction) using the reforming feedstock containing various hydrocarbon.
(1) A production method for producing carbon monoxide and hydrogen from carbon dioxide and methane by using a catalyst structure, wherein
the catalyst structure comprises a carrier of a porous structure composed of a zeolite type compound, and
at least one catalytic material existing in the carrier, wherein
the carrier has channels communicating with each other, and
the catalytic material is a metal fine particle and exists at least in the channel of the carrier.
(2) The production method according to the above embodiment (1), wherein the production method has a step of supplying carbon dioxide and methane to the catalyst structure.
(3) The production method according to the above embodiment (1) or (2), wherein the production method includes using the catalyst structure in a synthesis gas producing apparatus, and subjecting carbon dioxide and methane to synthesis treatment in the synthesis gas producing apparatus.
(4) A production method for producing a reformed gas containing hydrogen from hydrocarbon and steam by using a catalyst structure wherein
the catalyst structure includes a carrier of a porous structure composed of a zeolite type compound, and
at least one catalytic material existing in the carrier, wherein
the carrier has channels communicating with each other, and
the catalytic material is a metal fine particle and exists at least in the channel of the carrier.
(5) The production method according to the above embodiment (5), wherein the production method has a step of supplying a reforming feedstock containing hydrocarbon and steam to the catalyst structure.
(6) The production method according to the above embodiment (4) or (5), wherein the production method includes using the catalyst structure in a reforming apparatus, and subjecting the reforming feedstock containing hydrocarbon to reforming treatment in the reforming apparatus.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-108609 | May 2017 | JP | national |
| 2017-108640 | May 2017 | JP | national |
The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/994,098, filed May 31, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,161,101, which claims priority to Japanese Application Nos. 2017-108609, filed May 31, 2017 and 2017-108640, filed May 31, 2017. The entire contents of all of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3898180 | Crooks et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 4552855 | Ozin et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 5026673 | Gates et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5236575 | Bennett et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5275720 | Ward | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5849652 | Davies et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5994603 | Mohr et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6040259 | Mohr et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6831203 | Mohr et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6881703 | Cutler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7074373 | Warren et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7592291 | Rollins et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7893311 | Takamatsu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 11161101 | Kato et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 20030109383 | Koike et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188991 | Shan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040176245 | Hagemeyer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192947 | Chane-Ching et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050201920 | Shan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060211777 | Severinsky | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216227 | Idem et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004593 | Ohno et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167551 | Goodwin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045400 | Rollins et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080045403 | Rollins et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051280 | Hagemeyer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072705 | Chaumonnot et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280754 | Toledo Antonio et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293990 | Stevenson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090286677 | Takeshima et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325790 | Haller et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004118 | Liu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110085944 | Rollins et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092356 | Rollins et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092745 | Senoo et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110121238 | Wakatsuki | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293941 | Chaumonnot et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120042631 | Schmieg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120060472 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120142238 | Saitou et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120231948 | Saito | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130041174 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130090445 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196158 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140021096 | Chaumonnot et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128246 | Garcia-Martinez | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140147362 | Sasaki et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140284524 | Lee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303266 | Hyman | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150018590 | Stevenson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150290635 | Inokawa et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150367332 | Kuvettu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160017238 | Stamires et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160023913 | Goel et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160024400 | Iwasa et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160030934 | Zhan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160032202 | Yonemura et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160087285 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160114314 | Ali et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160129429 | Kegnaes et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160137516 | Kegnaes et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160369174 | Kool et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170036197 | Kegnaes et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20180194700 | Pan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311651 | Ravon et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20200254432 | Shirman et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2256515 | Dec 1997 | CA |
| 1223602 | Jul 1999 | CN |
| 1720098 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 1729138 | Feb 2006 | CN |
| 1876766 | Dec 2006 | CN |
| 101130466 | Feb 2008 | CN |
| 101180125 | May 2008 | CN |
| 101362959 | Feb 2009 | CN |
| 101720252 | Jun 2010 | CN |
| 101909750 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102056889 | May 2011 | CN |
| 102099114 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102247887 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 102400744 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 102574120 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102844115 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 103118976 | May 2013 | CN |
| 103459012 | Dec 2013 | CN |
| 103663490 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 104650291 | May 2015 | CN |
| 105008492 | Oct 2015 | CN |
| 105347359 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105358251 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105377424 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 106362787 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 0 485 180 | May 1992 | EP |
| 1 709 125 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 2 484 444 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2 692 439 | Feb 2014 | EP |
| 2 992 984 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 57-46925 | Mar 1982 | JP |
| 5-49943 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 6-142456 | May 1994 | JP |
| 7-96195 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| 8-155303 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 11-33412 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11-151440 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 2000-197822 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000-511107 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000-323164 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2002-255537 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-336704 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2004-528158 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2005-170903 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-270734 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2005-314208 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006-21994 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2007-130525 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2007-519799 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2008-12382 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2008-542177 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 2009-505830 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2009-255014 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2010-501496 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2010-99638 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010-527769 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2011-517439 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 4879574 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012-153654 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 2012-170951 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2012-210557 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2013-255911 | Dec 2013 | JP |
| 2014-104428 | Jun 2014 | JP |
| 2014-534902 | Dec 2014 | JP |
| 5700376 | Feb 2015 | JP |
| 2015-165138 | Sep 2015 | JP |
| 2015-189586 | Nov 2015 | JP |
| 2016-2527 | Jan 2016 | JP |
| 2016-64407 | Apr 2016 | JP |
| 2016-69318 | May 2016 | JP |
| 2016-87522 | May 2016 | JP |
| 2016-529190 | Sep 2016 | JP |
| WO 2016181622 | Nov 2016 | JP |
| 2017-39218 | Feb 2017 | JP |
| 2017-64647 | Apr 2017 | JP |
| 2017-509732 | Apr 2017 | JP |
| 2017-128480 | Jul 2017 | JP |
| WO 9745197 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9745387 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 2007000847 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007023558 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2009096548 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010097108 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010097224 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011065194 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012105581 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012170421 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013057319 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013115213 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014083772 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014132367 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015001123 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015155216 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016014691 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017000427 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017072698 | May 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Fujikawa, T., “Current status and future prospects of petroleum refining catalysts”, The Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, LTD., Jan. 1, 2017, vol. 65, No. 1, p. 22 (with English abstract and cover page). |
| Haruta, M., “Low-temperature Combustion Catalysts—Mainly for CO Oxidation-”, Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, vol. 37, No. 5, 1994, pp. 480-491 (with English abstract). |
| Wu, Z., et al., “Hydrothermal synthesis of LTA-encapsulated metal clusters and consequences for catalyst stability, reactivity, and selectivity”, Journal of Catalysis, vol. 311, Jan. 31, 2014, pp. 458-468. |
| “Reverse Water Gas Shift Catalysts”, Industrial Catalyst News, No. 107, Aug. 1, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Sasaki, M., et al., “Templating fabrication of platinum nanoparticles and nanowires using the confined mesoporous channels of FSM-16-their structural characterization and catalytic performances in water gas shift reaction”, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 141, No. 1/3, May 6, 1999, pp. 223-240. |
| Fumoto, E., et al., “Catalytic Cracking of Heavy Oil with Iron Oxide-based Catalysts Using Hydrogen and Oxygen Species form Steam”, Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, vol. 58, No. 5, 2015, pp. 329-335_ Searched on May 17, 2017, URL: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpi/58/5/58_329/_pdf. |
| Ismagilov, Z.R., et al., “Structural Changes of Mo/ZSM-5 Catalysts During the Methane Dehydroaromatization”, Eurasian ChemTech Journal, vol. 12, 2010, pp. 9-16. |
| Catalyst Round-table conference news, No. 96, Nov. 1, 2016, 10 pages (with unedited computer generated English translation). |
| Ichikawa, M., et al., “Advanced Technology of Methane Chemical Conversion”, CMC Publishing Co., Ltd., 2008, 11 pages (with English translation). |
| Laprune, D., et al., “Highly Dispersed Nickel Particles Encapsulated in Multi-hollow Silicalite-1 Single Crystal Nanoboxes: Effects of Siliceous Deposits and Phosphorous Species on the Catalytic Performances”, ChemCatChem, vol. 9, No. 12, Feb. 18, 2017, pp. 2297-2307 with cover page. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2019 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/994,098. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021082 (with English translation), 25 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021082 (with English translation), 22 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021078 (with English translation), 24 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021078 (with English translation), 21 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021079 (with English translation), 23 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021079 (with English translation), 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 31, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021084 (with English translation), 19 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021084 (with English translation), 16 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021080 (with English translation), 25 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021080 (with English translation), 22 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021081 (with English translation), 22 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021081 (with English translation), 19 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021086 (with English translation), 23 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021086 (with English translation), 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021090 (with English translation), 26 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021090 (with English translation), 23 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021091 (with English translation), 23 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021091 (with English translation), 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021092 (with English translation), 26 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021092 (with English translation), 22 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021094 (with English translation), 20 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021094 (with English translation), 17 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018 in PCT/JP2018/021095 (with English translation), 22 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 3, 2019 in PCT/JP2018/021095 (with English translation), 19 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application dated May 8, 2020 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2018277966, 4 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application dated May 8, 2020 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2018276617, 4 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application dated May 8, 2020 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2018276618, 4 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application dated May 8, 2020 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2018277967, 4 pages. |
| Ichikawa, M. et al., “Advanced Technology of Methane Chemical Conversion”, CMC, High Technology Information, 2008, 11 pages (with English translation). |
| Yokoi, “Characterization of zeolites by advanced SEM/STEM techniques,” Scientific Instrument News, Sep. 2016, vol. 7, pp. 17-23 (Year: 2016). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 in Australian Patent Application No. 2018276617. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2021 in the relevant U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,545, 28 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2021 in the relevant U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,679, 50 pages. |
| Wang et al., “Study on methane aromatization over MoO3/HMCM-49 catalyst”, Catalysis Today, 93-95, pp. 75-80, 2004. |
| Interview Summary dated Apr. 26, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,670, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 6, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,670, 30 pages. |
| Jiaying Cai, et al., “Gold Nanoclusters Confined in a Supercage of Y Zeolite for Aerobic Oxidation of HMF under Mild Conditions,” Chemistry A European Journal, vol. 19, 2013, pp. 14215-14223. |
| I.M. Kalogeras, et al., “Electrical Properties of Zeolitic Catalysts,” Defect and Diffusion Forum, vol. 164, 1998, 37 pages. |
| S. Mitra, et al., “Molecular dynamics using quasielastic neutron scattering technique,” Current Science, vol. 84, No. 5, Mar. 10, 2003, 11 pages. |
| Avelino Corma, et al., “ITQ-15: The first ultralarge pore zeolite with a bi-directional pore system formed by intersecting 14- and 12-ring channels, and its catalytic implications,” Chem. Commun., 2004, pp. 1356-1357. |
| Avelino Corma, et al., “A zeolite with interconnected 8-, 10- and 12-ring pores and its unique catalytic selectivity,” Nature Materials, vol. 2, Jul. 2003, 7 pages. |
| Nan Jiang, et al., “The adsorption mechanism of organic micropollutants on high-silica zeolites causing S-shaped adsorption isotherms: An experimental and Monte Carlo simulation study,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 389, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2022, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521324 (with English Translation), 17 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,468. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Aug. 3, 2022, in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035569.8 (with English Translation and English Translation of Category of Cited Documents), 22 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Aug. 3, 2022, in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036313.9 (with English Translation and English Translation of Category of Cited Documents), 25 pages. |
| “Preparation and Application of Molecular Sieves”, Edited by Shanghai Reagent Factory, Jun. 1976, 5 pages (with English Translation). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,636, 44 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,468, 29 pages. |
| College of Engineering, UC Santa Barbara [retrieved on Apr. 26, 2021] Retrieved from the Internet :< URL: https://sites.engineering.ucsb.edu/-jbraw/chemreacfun/ch7/slides-masswrxn-2up.pdf>, 2020, pp. 81. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2021 in the relevant U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,558, 45 pages. |
| Examination Report dated May 7, 2021 in the Australian Patent Application No. 2018277966, 3 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2021 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 18810518.3, 21 pages. |
| Shiwen Li el al., “Diffusion-Driven Selectivity in Oxidation of CO in the Presence of Propylene Using Zeolite Nano Shell as Membrane”, ACS Catalysis, vol. 4, No. 12, Nov. 5, 2014, pp. 4299-4303, XP055785093, US ISSN:2155-5435, DOI:10.1021/cs501349b. |
| Shiwen Li el al., “Diffusion-Driven Selectivity in Oxidation of CO in the Presence of Propylene Using Zeolite Nano Shell as Membrane”, ACS Catalysis, vol. 4, No. 12, Dec. 5, 2014, pp. 4299-4303, XP055676549, US ISSN:2155-5435, DOI:10.1021/cs501349b. |
| Zhong et al., “Catalysis of the Refinement Process”, Sinopec Press, China Petrochemical Publishing House, Aug. 2022, pp. 34-35 (8 total pages) (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/994,098. |
| Saudi Arabian Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2022 in Saudi Arabian Patent Application No. 519410663 (with English language translation), 13 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 7, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521325 (with English machine translation), 16 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 7, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521335 (with English machine translation), 15 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 7, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521334 (with English machine translation), 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,650, 44 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,558, 46 pages. |
| Wen, B., et al, “Enhanced catalytic performance of Co/MFI by hydrothermal treatment”, Catalysis Letters, vol. 68, Nos. 1-3, Mar. 2003 (Year:2003), pp. 39-42. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2021 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,579, 27 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2021 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,602. 43 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2022, corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035173.3 (with English Translation and English Translation of Category of Cited Documents), 25 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2022, corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035360.1 (with English Translation and English Translation of Category of Cited Documents), 34 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Aug. 3, 2022, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521322 (with English Translation), 7 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Aug. 3, 2022, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521331 (with English Translation), 7 pages. |
| Miao Tao et al., “Highly dispersed nickel within mesochannels of SBA-15 for CO methanation with enhanced activity and excellent thermostability”, Fuel, Oct. 13, 2016, pp. 267-276, Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel. |
| Chengyi Dai et al., “Synthesis of Hollow Nanocubes and Macroporous Monoliths of Silicalite-1 by Alkaline Treatment”, Chemistry of Materials, Oct. 7, 2013, pp. 4197-4205. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 16. 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,527, 51 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 12, 2021 issued in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,496, 23 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Ssearch Report dated Apr. 20, 2022, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035803.7 (with English translation), 19 pages. |
| Liu Quansheng, et al., “Progress in Water-Gas-Shift Catalysts”, Progress in Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, vol. 17 No. 3, May 2005, pp. 389-398. |
| Li Jinlin, et al., “SBA-16 with Different Pore Size Supported Cobal Catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis”, Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Nat. Sci. Edition), vol. 34 No. 4, Dec. 2015, 8 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021 in the Australian Patent Application No. 2018277966, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2021, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,496. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2021 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,567, 41 pages. |
| J. M. Newsam, “The Zeolite Cage Structure,” Science, New Series, vol. 231, Mar. 7, 1986, 8 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 10, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,650. |
| Office Action dated May 17, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,527. |
| Combined Chined Office Action and Search Report dated May 5, 2022 in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036312.4 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 16 pages. |
| Yicheng, Z., et al., “Advances in the catalysis of methanol to aromatics reaction”, Chemical Industry and engineering progress, vol. 35, No. 3, Mar. 5, 2016, pp. 154-159 (with English abstract and English translation). |
| Dai, C., et al., “Hollow Zeolite encapsulated Ni—Pt bimetals for sintering and coking resistant dry reforming of methane”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Jan. 1, 2015. pp. 16461-16468. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2022 in the corresponding Japanese Patent Appacation No. 2019-521326 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 16 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated May 7, 2022 in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035210.0 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 14 pages. |
| Zhang, L-Z., et al., “Preparation of Phenol and Acetone with Solid Add Catalyst”, Chemical World, Mar. 16, 2012 (with English abstract). |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated May 16, 2022 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036071.3 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 19 pages. |
| Australian Office Action dated May 6, 2022 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2021202968, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Mar. 16, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521331 (with English machine translation), 10 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Mar. 16, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521322 (with English machine translation), 12 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Mar. 28, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521324 (with English machine translation), 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,650, 54 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,636, 51 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,527, 47 pages. |
| Cho et al., “Zeolite-Encapsulated Pt Nanoparticles for Tandem Catalysis”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, pp. 13514-13520. |
| Li et al., “Ultrastable Perovskite-Zeolite Composite Enabled by Encapsulation and In Situ Passivation”, Angew. Chem. Sep. 2020, 132, pp. 23300-23306. |
| Wang, et al. “In Situ Encapsulated Pt Nanoparticles Dispersed in Low Temperature Oxygen for Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas”, Catalysts, 2019, 9, pp. 720-734. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,670. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,636. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2022, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,679. |
| Do et al., “Zeolite Nanoclusters Coated onto the Mesopore Walls of SBA-15”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, pp. 14324-14325. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18810519.1, 9 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 7, 2020 in European Patent Application No. 18809577.2, 13 pages. |
| The Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Jan. 11, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18810518.3, 18 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 13, 2020 in European Patent Application No. 18810103.4, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 7, 2020 in European Patent Application No. 18809883.4, 13 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 7, 2020 in European Patent Application No. 18808807.4, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 11, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 188109956.8, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18810418.6, 28 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 11, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18808738.1, 14 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18809413.0, 35 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18810207.3, 29 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18810208.1, 28 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2021 in European Patent Application No. 18809886.7, 12 pages. |
| Chengyi Dai, et al., “Hollow Zeolite-Encapsulated Fe—Cu Bimatellic Catalysis for Phenol Degradation” Catalysis Today, vol. 297, XP085215768, Feb. 7, 2017, pp. 335-343. |
| Maneesha Mishra, et al., “α-Fe2O3 as a Photocatalytic Material: A Review” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 498, XP029220089, Mar. 28, 2015, pp. 126-141. |
| Chengyi Dai, et al., “Hollow Zeolite-Encapsulated Ni—Pt Bimetals for Sintering and Coking Resistant Dry Reforming of Methane” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, No. 32, XP055336366, Jun. 29, 2015, pp. 16461-16468. |
| Xue Liu, et al., “Drying of Ni/Alumina Catalysts: Control of the Metal Distribution Using Surfactants and the Melt Infiltration Method” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 53, No. 14, XP055716163, Apr. 9, 2014, pp. 5792-5800. |
| E. V. Makshina et al., “Methanol Oxidation on LaCo Mixed Oxide Supported onto MCM-41 Molecular Sieve” Catalysis Today, vol. 131, No. 1-4, XP022432561, Nov. 28, 2007, pp. 427-430. |
| Hong Wang, et al., “Research into Eliminating Particulate from Diesel Engine Exhaust over Zeolite Covered with Catalysts of Perovskite-Type Oxides” 2009 International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology, XP031588294, Oct. 16, 2009, pp. 493-495. |
| Ming Bo Yue et al., “Directly Transforming As-Synthesized MCM-41 to Mesoporous MFI Zeolite” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, No. 17, XP055235387, Mar. 13, 2008, pp. 2044-2050. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2021 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,558, 34 pages. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2022, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521326 (with English Translation), 19 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,558. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,636. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2021 issued in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,670, 52 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,670, 60 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521334 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 11 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521335 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 13 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521325 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,527, 49 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,650, 51 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,679, 38 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2022 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/689,579, 44 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 11, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036382.X (with unedited computer generated English translation), 18 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 13, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035026.6 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 19 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521318 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 16 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521319 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 21 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521320 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 16 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2022 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-521321 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 16 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 5, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035017.7 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 29 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jun. 27, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035525.5 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 17 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036388.7 (with unedited computer generated English translation), 20 pages. |
| Laprune, D., et al., “Highly Dispersed Nickel Particles Encapsulated in Multi-hollow Silicalite-1 Single Crystal Nanoboxes: Effects of Siliceous Deposits and Phosphorous Species on the Catalytic Performances”, ChemCatChem, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 2297-2307. |
| Liang, W., et al., “Surfactant Applications in Dispersion”, China Light Industry Press, Feb. 2003 (with English translation), 7 pages. |
| Rolando M.A., et al., “Adsorption and Diffusion in Nanoporous Materials”, Materials Chemistry, Mar. 5, 2007, pp. 226 and 227 with cover pages. |
| Hosseinpour, N., et al., “Cumene cracking activity and enhanced regeneration of FCC catalysts comprising HY-zeolite and LaBO3 (B=Co, Mn, and Fe) perovskites”, Applied Catalysis A, 2014, pp. 26-35. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035210.0, 20 pages (with English translation). |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Jan. 5, 2023 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035525.5, 18 pages (with English translation). |
| Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036312.4 (with English translation), 20 pages. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Nov. 10, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035803.7 (with English translation), 19 pages. |
| Zhong et al., “Catalysis of the Refinement Process”, Sinopec Press, China Petrochemical Publishing House, Aug. 2002, pp. 34-35 (8 total pages) (with English translation). |
| Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2022, issued in the relevant SA application No. 519410673 (with English Translation), 13 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2022, issued in the relevant SA application No. 519410677 (with English Translation), 13 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2023, issued in the relevant CN application No. 201880036382.X (with English Translation), 15 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2022, issued in the relevant SA application No. 519410680 (with English Translation), 13 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2023, issued in the relevant CN application No. 201880035017.7 (with English Translation), 18 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2023, issued in the relevant CN application No. 201880035026.6 (with English Translation), 15 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2023, issued in the relevant CN application No. 201880035360.1 (with English Translation), 27 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 1, 2023, issued in the relevant JP application No. 2019-521320, (with English Translation), 10 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 1, 2023, issued in the relevant JP application No. 2019-521321, (with English Translation), 10 pages. |
| Decision of Refusal dated Feb. 1, 2023, issued in the relevant JP application No. 2019-521318 (with English Translation), 8 pages. |
| Decision of Refusal dated Feb. 1, 2023, issued in the relevant JP application No. 2019-521319 (with English translation), 10 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2023, issued in the relevant CN applicationNo.201880036313.9 (with English Translation), 21 pages. |
| Second Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2023 in the relevant CN application No. 201880035173.3, 23 pages (with English Translation). |
| Second Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2023 in the corresponding CN application No. 201880035569.8, 20 pages (with English Translation). |
| 3rd Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2023 in the relevant CN application No. 201880035803.7, 16 pages (with English Translation). |
| 3rd Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2023 in the relevant CN application No. 201880036312.4, 19 pages (with English Translation). |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Mar. 22, 2023 issued in the relevant JP application No. 2019-521324, 6 pages (with English Translation). |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Apr. 4, 2023 in the relevant JP Application No. 2019-521322 (with full machine translation), 4 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Apr. 4, 2023 in the corresponding JP Application No. 2019-521325 (with full machine translation), 12 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Apr. 4, 2023 in the relevant JP Application No. 2019-521331 (with full machine translation), 4 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Apr. 4, 2023 in the corresponding JP Application No. 2019-521335 (with full machine translation), 4 pages. |
| Decision of Rejection dated Jun. 13, 2023 in the relevant Chinese Patent Application No. 20180035525.5 (with English translation), 4 pages. |
| Third Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2023 in the relevant Chinese Patent Application No. 20188035210.0 (with English translation), 25 pages. |
| Decision of Rejection dated Jun. 26, 2023 in relevant Chinese Patent Application No. 201880035360.1 (with English Translation), 32 pages. |
| Decision of Rejection dated Jun. 27, 2023 in relevant Chinese Patent Application No. 201880036313.9 (with English Translation), 23 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2023 in relevant European Patent Application No. 18809577.2, 7 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2023 in relevant European Patent Application No. 18808807.4, 6 pages. |
| “Reconsideration Report by Examiner before Appeal” dated Jul. 21, 2023, issued in relevant Japanese Application No. 2019-521318, with English Translation, 6 pages. |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 1, 2023 in relevant CN Application No. 201880035017.7 (with Machine full translation). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 4, 2023 in relevant CN Application No. 201880035026.6 (with Machine full translation). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 10, 2023 in relevant CN application No. 201880035803.7 (with Machine full translation). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 10, 2023 in relevant CN application No. 201880036312.4 (with Machine full translation). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 1, 2023 in the relevant CN application No. 201880035173.3 (with Machine full translation). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2023 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 18/171,140. |
| Narayanan et al., “Structural, morphological and catalytic investigations on hierarchical ZSM-5 zeolite hexagonal cubes by surfactant assisted hydrothermal method”, Powder Technology 274 (2015), pp. 338-348. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210162387 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15994098 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 17167280 | US |
