Patent Grant
8361174
The present invention relates to catalysts, systems, and methods for chemically processing polyols. More specifically, the invention relates to catalysts, systems, and methods for producing products such as fuels and fuel additives from polyols.
Polyols are compounds containing more than one hydroxyl group, each attached to separate carbon atoms of an aliphatic skeleton. Glycerin is one example of a polyol. Glycerin is a colorless, odorless, viscous liquid that is sweet-tasting and of low toxicity. Also known as glycerol, glycerine, or by its IUPAC name propane-1,2,3-triol, it is a chemical compound with various uses, including as a non-active ingredient in pharmaceutical formulations, as an additive to foods, and as a feedstock for the production of nitroglycerin.
In the past, glycerin was produced synthetically from epichlorohydrin. However, since glycerin forms the backbone of triglycerides, it is produced during transesterification of triglycerides, such as during the production of biodiesel fuel. Because production of biodiesel fuel has increased greatly in the recent past, the supply of glycerin has vastly exceeded demand, turning it into a very low value byproduct. In fact, the value of glycerin is so low that some plants producing it as a by-product have simply been incinerating it. Disposal of glycerin is likely to become an even bigger problem since forecasts suggest that production of biodiesel will continue to increase dramatically.
For at least these reasons, a need exists for new methods of utilizing polyols such as glycerin for producing higher value added products.
The present invention relates to catalysts, systems, and methods for producing products such as fuels and fuel additives from polyols. In an embodiment, the invention includes a method of producing a fuel additive, including combining a polyol and a component selected from the group consisting of alcohols and organic acids to form a reaction mixture and contacting the reaction mixture with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of greater than about 150 degrees Celsius.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a fuel additive produced according to the process of combining a polyol and a component selected from the group consisting of alcohols and carboxylic acids to form a reaction mixture and contacting the reaction mixture with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of greater than about 150 degrees Celsius.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a fuel composition including at least about 50 percent by weight of fatty acid alkyl esters and at least about 1 percent by weight of the reaction products of a polyol and a component selected from the group consisting of organic acids and alcohols.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a fuel composition produced according to the process of contacting a mixture of a lipid feedstock and ethanol with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature greater than about 150 degrees Celsius.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a method of making a fuel composition including processing a lipid feedstock in order to produce a mixture of fatty acid alkyl esters and glycerin, separating out the glycerin, combining the glycerin with an alcohol feedstock to form a reaction mixture, contacting the reaction mixture with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of greater than about 150 degrees Celsius to form a product mixture, and combining the product mixture with fatty acid alkyl esters to form the fuel composition.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a method of producing a cold weather biodiesel composition with including contacting glycerin and ethanol with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of greater than about 150 degrees Celsius to form a reaction product mixture and mixing the reaction product mixture with a fatty acid alkyl ester composition to form a cold weather biodiesel composition, such that the combined mixture includes at least about 0.1 wt. % of the reaction product mixture.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each discussed embodiment of the present invention. This is the purpose of the figures and the detailed description that follows.
The invention may be more completely understood in connection with the following drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example and drawings, and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
The embodiments of the present invention described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art can appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the present invention.
All publications and patents mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The publications and patents disclosed herein are provided solely for their disclosure. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate any publication and/or patent, including any publication and/or patent cited herein.
As described above, there is a need for methods and systems to convert polyols into higher value products. As shown in the examples below, embodiments of the invention can be used to convert polyols, such as glycerin, and at least one co-reactant into a higher value product mixture. The resulting product mixture has many uses including as a fuel and as a fuel additive that can improve the low temperature properties of biodiesel fuel.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a method of producing a fuel additive, including combining a polyol and a component selected from the group consisting of alcohols and organic acids to form a reaction mixture and contacting the reaction mixture with a metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of greater than about 150 degrees Celsius.
Polyols
Polyols used with embodiments of invention can include both dihydric and polyhydric alcohols. Polyols used with embodiments of the invention can include compounds having the general formula of HO—X—OH, wherein X is an aliphatic (including alkane, alkene, or alkyne) or aryl group having between one and sixty carbons. Exemplary polyols can specifically include glycerin, ethylene glycol, propanediol, and glucose.
Metal Oxide Catalysts
Metal oxide catalysts used with embodiments of the invention can include metal oxides with surfaces including Lewis acid sites, Lewis base sites, Brönsted base sites, and Brönsted acid sites. By definition, a Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor. A Brönsted base is a proton acceptor and a Brönsted acid is a proton donor. Metal oxide catalysts of the invention can specifically include zirconia, alumina, titania and hafnia. Metal oxide catalysts of the invention can also include silica clad with a metal oxide selected from the group consisting of zirconia, alumina, titania, hafnia, zinc oxide, copper oxide, magnesium oxide and iron oxide. Metal oxide catalysts of the invention can also include mixtures of metal oxides, such as mixtures of metal oxides including zirconia, alumina, titania and/or hafnia. Of the various metal oxides that can be used with embodiments of the invention, zirconia, titania and hafnia are advantageous as they are very chemically and thermally stable and can withstand very high temperatures and pressures as well as extremes in pH.
Metal oxides of the invention can include metal oxide particles clad with carbon. Carbon clad metal oxide particles can be made using various techniques such as the procedures described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,108,597; 5,254,262; 5,346,619; 5,271,833; and 5,182,016, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. Carbon cladding on metal oxide particles can render the surface of the particles more hydrophobic.
Metal oxides of the invention can also include polymer coated metal oxides. By way of example, metal oxides of the invention can include a metal oxide coated with polybutadiene (PBD). Polymer coated metal oxide particles can be made using various techniques such as the procedure described in Example 1 of U.S. Pub. Pat. App. No. 2005/0118409, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. Polymer coatings on metal oxide particles can render the surface of the particles more hydrophobic.
Metal oxide catalysts of the invention can be made in various ways. As one example, a colloidal dispersion of zirconium dioxide can be spray dried to produce aggregated zirconium dioxide particles. Colloidal dispersions of zirconium dioxide are commercially available from Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc., Ashland, Mass. The average diameter of particles produced using a spray drying technique can be varied by changing the spray drying conditions. Examples of spray drying techniques are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,138,336 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,597, the contents of both of which are herein incorporated by reference. It will be appreciated that other methods can also be used to create metal oxide particles. One example is an oil emulsion technique as described in Robichaud et al., Technical Note, “An Improved Oil Emulsion Synthesis Method for Large, Porous Zirconia Particles for Packed- or Fluidized-Bed Protein Chromatography,” Sep. Sci. Technol. 32, 2547-59 (1997). A second example is the formation of metal oxide particles by polymer induced colloidal aggregation as described in M. J. Annen, R. Kizhappali, P. W. Carr, and A. McCormick, “Development of Porous Zirconia Spheres by Polymerization-Induced Colloid Aggregation-Effect of Polymerization Rate,” J. Mater. Sci. 29, 6123-30 (1994). A polymer induced colloidal aggregation technique is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,834, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Metal oxide catalysts used in embodiments of the invention can be sintered by heating them in a furnace or other heating device at a relatively high temperature. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered at a temperature of about 160° C. or greater. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered at a temperature of about 400° C. or greater. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered at a temperature of about 600° C. or greater. Sintering can be done for various amounts of time depending on the desired effect. Sintering can make metal oxide catalysts more durable. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered for more than about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered for more than about 3 hours. However, sintering also reduces the surface area. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is sintered for less than about 1 week.
In some embodiments, the metal oxide catalyst is in the form of particles. Particles within a desired size range can be specifically selected for use as a catalyst. For example, particles can be sorted by size using techniques such as air classification, elutriation, settling fractionation, or mechanical screening. In some embodiments, the size of the particles is greater than about 0.2 μm. In some embodiments, the size range selected is from about 0.2 μm to about 1 mm. In some embodiments, the size range selected is from about 1 μm to about 100 μm. In some embodiments, the size range selected is from about 5 μm to about 15 μm. In some embodiments, the average size selected is about 10 μm. In some embodiments, the average size selected is about 5 μm.
In some embodiments, metal oxide particles used with embodiments of the invention are porous. By way of example, in some embodiments the metal oxide particles can have an average pore size of about 30 angstroms to about 2000 angstroms. However, in other embodiments, metal oxide particles used are non-porous.
The physical properties of a porous metal oxide can be quantitatively described in various ways such as by surface area, pore volume, porosity, and pore diameter. In some embodiments, metal oxide catalysts of the invention can have a surface area of between about 1 and about 200 m2/gram. Pore volume refers to the proportion of the total volume taken up by pores in a material per weight amount of the material. In some embodiments, metal oxide catalysts of the invention can have a pore volume of between about 0.01 mL/g and about 2 mL/g. Porosity refers to the proportion within a total volume that is taken up by pores. As such, if the total volume of a particle is 1 cm3 and it has a porosity of 0.5, then the volume taken up by pores within the total volume is 0.5 cm3. In some embodiments, metal oxide catalysts of the invention can have a porosity of between about 0 and about 0.8. In some embodiments, metal oxide catalysts of the invention can have a porosity of between about 0.3 and 0.6.
Metal oxide particles used with embodiments of the invention can have various shapes. By way of example, in some embodiments the metal oxide can be in the form of spherules. In other embodiments, the metal oxide can be a monolith. In some embodiments, the metal oxide can have an irregular shape.
The Lewis acid sites on metal oxides of the invention can interact with Lewis basic compounds. Thus, Lewis basic compounds can be bonded to the surface of metal oxides of the invention. A Lewis base is an electron pair donor. Lewis basic compounds of the invention can include anions formed from the dissociation of acids such as hydrobromic acid, hydrochloric acid, hydroiodic acid, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, perchloric acid, boric acid, chloric acid, phosphoric acid, pyrophosphoric acid, chromic acid, permanganic acid, phytic acid and ethylenediamine tetramethyl phosphonic acid (EDTPA), and the like. Lewis basic compounds of the invention can also include hydroxide ion as formed from the dissociation of bases such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide and the like.
The anion of an acid can be bonded to a metal oxide of the invention by refluxing the metal oxide in an acid solution. By way of example, metal oxide particles can be refluxed in a solution of sulfuric acid. Alternatively, the anion formed from dissociation of a base, such as the hydroxide ion formed from dissociation of sodium hydroxide, can be bonded to a metal oxide by refluxing in a base solution. By way of example, metal oxide particles can be refluxed in a solution of sodium hydroxide. The base or acid modification can be achieved under exposure to the acid or base in either batch or continuous flow conditions when disposed in a reactor housing at elevated temperature and pressure to speed up the adsorption/modification process. In some embodiments, fluoride ion, such as formed by the dissociation of sodium fluoride, can be bonded to the particles.
In some embodiments, metal oxide particles can be packed into a housing, such as a column. Disposing metal oxide particles in a housing is one approach to facilitating continuous flow processes. Many different techniques may be used for packing the metal oxide particles into a housing. The specific technique used may depend on factors such as the average particle size, the type of housing used, etc. Generally speaking, particles with an average size of about 1-20 microns can be packed under pressure and particles with an average size larger than 20 microns can be packed by dry-packing/tapping methods or by low pressure slurry packing. In some embodiments, the metal oxide particles of the invention can be impregnated into a membrane, such as a PTFE membrane.
However, in some embodiments, metal oxide catalysts used with embodiments of the invention are not in particulate form. For example, a layer of a metal oxide can be disposed on a substrate in order to form a catalyst used with embodiments of the invention. The substrate can be a surface that is configured to contact the alcohol feedstock during processing. In one approach, a metal oxide catalyst can be disposed as a layer over a surface of a reactor that contacts the alcohol feedstock. Alternatively, the metal oxide catalyst can be embedded as a particulate in the surface of an element that is configured to contact the alcohol feedstock during processing.
Reaction Conditions
In some embodiments, the reaction temperature is about 150° Celsius or hotter. In some embodiments, the reaction temperature is about 200° Celsius or higher. In some embodiments, the reaction temperature is about 300° Celsius or higher. In some embodiments, the reaction temperature is about 350° Celsius or higher.
The reaction mixture may be passed over the metal oxide catalyst for a length of time sufficient for the reaction to reach a desired level of completion. This will, in turn, depend on various factors including the temperature of the reaction, the chemical nature of the catalyst, the surface area of the catalyst, the contact time with the catalyst and the like. In an embodiment, the contact time is between about 0.1 seconds and 2 hours. In an embodiment, the contact time is between about 1 second and 20 minutes. In an embodiment, the contact time is between about 2 seconds and 1 minute.
In some embodiments, the reaction mixture is kept under pressure during the reaction in order to prevent components of the reaction mixture (such as the co-reactant feedstock) from vaporizing. The reactor housing can be configured to withstand the pressure under which the reaction mixture is kept. In addition, a backpressure regulator can be used to maintain a desired pressure. A desirable pressure for the reactor can be estimated with the aid of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. Specifically, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation can be used to estimate the vapor pressures of a liquid. The Clausius-Clapeyron equation is as follows:
wherein ΔHvap=is the enthalpy of vaporization; P1 is the vapor pressure of a liquid at temperature T1; P2 is the vapor pressure of a liquid at temperature T2, and R is the ideal gas constant.
In an embodiment, the pressure inside the housing is greater than the vapor pressures of any of the components of the reaction mixture. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 500 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 800 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 1000 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 1500 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 2000 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 3000 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 3000 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 4000 psi. In an embodiment, the pressure is greater than about 5000 psi.
Alcohols
Embodiments of the invention can include combining a polyol, such as glycerin, with an alcohol and then contacting the resulting mixture with a metal oxide catalyst. Exemplary alcohols can include aliphatic, aromatic, and alicyclic alcohols. In some embodiments, alcohols can include C1-C30 alcohols (alcohols with one to thirty carbon atoms). In some embodiments, alcohols can include C1-C6 alkyl alcohols. Alcohols used herein can be mono-functional or multi-functional (e.g., one alcohol moiety or multiple alcohol moieties). Exemplary alcohols can specifically include methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropyl alcohol, butanol, and the like.
Alcohol feedstocks used with embodiments herein can include those formed through fermentation processes. By way of example, biomass can be fermented by microorganisms in order to produced alcohol feedstocks. Virtually any living organism is a potential source of biomass for use in fermentation processes. As such, alcohol feedstocks can be derived from industrial processing wastes, food processing wastes, mill wastes, municipal/urban wastes, forestry products and forestry wastes, agricultural products and agricultural wastes, amongst other sources. In some embodiments, alcohol feedstocks as used herein can be formed from biological wastes using processes such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,309,592, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Though not limiting the scope of possible sources, specific examples of biomass crop sources for alcohol production can include corn, poplar, switchgrass, reed canary grass, willow, silver maple, black locust, sycamore, sweetgum, sorghum, miscanthus, eucalyptus, hemp, maize, wheat, soybeans, alfalfa, pennycress and prairie grasses.
Organic Acids
Embodiments of the invention can include combining polyols, such as glycerin, with an organic acid and then contacting the resulting mixture with a metal oxide catalyst. It will be appreciated that various organic acids can be used. By way of example, in some embodiments organic acids can specifically include carboxylic acids. Exemplary carboxylic acids can include both aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids. Exemplary carboxylic acids can specifically include acetic acid, propanoic acid, butyric acid, and benzoic acid.
Polyol Reaction Systems
It will be appreciated that many different reactor designs are possible in order to perform methods and processes as described herein.
The polyol feedstock passes through a pump 102 before passing through a heat exchanger 106 where the polyol feedstock can absorb heat from downstream products. Similarly, the co-reactant feedstock (alcohol and/or organic acid) then passes through a pump 104 before passing through the heat exchanger 106. An exemplary heat exchanger is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,666,074, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference. For example, a pipe or tube containing the effluent flow is routed past a pipe or tube holding the feedstock flow or the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, a thermally conductive material, such as a metal, connects the effluent flow with the feedstock flow so that heat can be efficiently transferred from the effluent products to the incoming feedstock. Transferring heat from the effluent flow to the feedstock flow can make the production process more energy efficient since less energy is used to get the reaction mixture up to a desired temperature.
Both the polyol feedstock and the co-reactant feedstock can be continuously sparged with an inert gas such as nitrogen to remove dissolved oxygen from the feedstocks. The feedstocks can then optionally pass through a shutoff valve 108 and, optionally, a filter 110 to remove particulate material of a certain size from the feedstock stream. The feedstock streams can then pass through a preheater 112. The preheater 112 can elevate the temperature of the reaction mixture to a desired level. Many different types of heaters are known in the art and can be used.
The reaction mixture can then pass through a reactor 114 where the co-reactant feedstock and the polyol feedstock are converted into a reaction product mixture. The reactor can include a metal oxide catalyst, such as in the various forms described herein. In some embodiments the reactor housing is a ceramic that can withstand elevated temperatures and pressures. In some embodiments, the reactor housing is a metal or an alloy of metals.
The reaction product mixture can then pass through the heat exchanger 106 in order to transfer heat from the effluent reaction product stream to the polyol and co-reactant feedstock streams. The reaction product mixture can also pass through a backpressure regulator 116 before passing on to a reaction product storage tank 118. In some embodiments, residual co-reactant can be separated from the liquid reaction product mixture and then fed back into the reactor or back into the co-reactant feedstock tank 103.
In some embodiments, the reaction mixture reaches the desired level of completion after one pass over the metal oxide catalyst bed or packing However, in some embodiments, the effluent flow may be rerouted over the same metal oxide catalyst or routed over another metal oxide catalyst bed or packing so that reaction is pushed farther toward completion in stages.
In some embodiments two or more metal oxide catalyst beds. In some embodiments, an acid-modified metal oxide catalyst (such as sulfuric or phosphoric acid modified) and a base-modified metal oxide catalyst (such as sodium hydroxide modified) can be separately formed but then disposed together within a single reactor housing. In such an approach, the reaction mixture passing through the reactor housing can be simultaneously exposed to both the acid and base modified metal oxide catalysts.
In some embodiments, two different metal oxides (such zirconia and titania) can be separately formed but then disposed together within a single reactor housing. In such an approach, the reaction mixture passing through the reactor housing can be simultaneously exposed to both metal oxide catalysts.
In some embodiments, one or more metal oxides (such zirconia and titania) can be coated on an inert porous support (such as silica gel or zeolite) separately formed but then disposed together within a single reactor housing. In such an approach, the reaction mixture passing through the reactor housing can be simultaneously exposed to the metal oxide catalyst(s).
Further Embodiments
In some embodiments, polyol reactors as described herein can be used in conjunction with plants that produce biodiesel. For example, a polyol reactor as described herein can be used in conjunction with a plant that produces biodiesel and polyol as a by-product. For example, referring now to
In some embodiments, not shown, a biodiesel product mixture (including biodiesel, polyols, and excess alcohol) after being formed in a biodiesel plant may pass through a flash separator to remove the excess alcohol and volatiles from the biodiesel product mixture. As such, in some embodiments, some of the energy that would otherwise be transferred by way of a heat exchanger, is dissipated in the flash separator.
The polyol and/or co-reactant feedstocks may be continuously sparged with an inert gas such as nitrogen or helium to remove dissolved oxygen. The polyol and co-reactant feedstocks optionally pass through a shutoff valve 208 and, optionally, a filter 210 to remove particulate material of a certain size. The polyol and co-reactant feedstocks then pass through a preheater 212. The reaction mixture can then pass through a reactor 214 where the polyol and co-reactant feedstocks are converted into a reaction product mixture. The reactor can include a metal oxide catalyst, such as in the various forms described herein.
The reaction product mixture can pass through the heat exchanger 206 in order to transfer heat from the effluent reaction product stream to the feedstock streams. The reaction product mixture can also pass through a backpressure regulator 216 before passing on to a reaction product storage tank 218. In some embodiments, residual co-reactant can be separated from the reaction product mixture and then fed back into the co-reactant tank 203.
Referring now to
The reaction mixture can then pass through a reactor 316 where the ethanol feedstock and the polyol feedstock are converted into a reaction product mixture. The reactor can include a metal oxide catalyst, such as in the various forms described herein. The reaction product mixture can then pass through the heat exchanger 312 in order to transfer heat from the effluent reaction product stream to the polyol and ethanol feedstock streams. The reaction product mixture can also pass through a backpressure regulator 318 before passing on to an as-made fuel storage tank 320. From the storage tank 320, volatile gases can be passed to a thermal oxidizer 322. The top layer from the storage tank 320 can be passed to a distillation apparatus 324, such as a fractional distillation apparatus. The distillation apparatus 324 can serve to separate out components such as diethyl ether, residual ethanol, and polyol fuel. The diethyl ether can pass to a diethyl ether tank 326. Similarly, the polyol fuel can pass to a polyol fuel tank 328. The recovered ethanol can pass through a pump 320 before being returned to the ethanol feedstock tank 308.
In various embodiments, the reaction products of a polyol and a component selected from group including organic acids and alcohols can be used as an additive to enhance the properties of a fuel composition. By way of example, a fuel composition can be formed by combining the reaction products of glycerin and an alcohol with a fatty acid alkyl ester composition. The use of such reaction products in this manner can provide the resulting fuel composition with various beneficial properties.
In some embodiments, a fuel composition can include at least about 0.1 percent by weight of the reaction products of a polyol and a co-reactant selected from organic acids and alcohols. In some embodiments, a fuel composition can include at least about 1.0 percent by weight of the reaction products of a polyol and a co-reactant selected from organic acids and alcohols. In some embodiments, a fuel composition can include at least about 5.0 percent by weight of the reaction products of a polyol and a co-reactant selected from organic acids and alcohols.
The present invention may be better understood with reference to the following examples. These examples are intended to be representative of specific embodiments of the invention, and are not intended as limiting the scope of the invention.
700 mL of 1.0 M sodium hydroxide was placed in a 2 liter plastic Erlenmeyer flask. 110 g of 80 μm diameter (60 Angstrom average pore diameter) bare titania (commercially available from ZirChrom Separations, Inc., Anoka, Minn.) was added to the flask. The particle suspension was sonicated for 10 minutes under vacuum and then swirled for 2 hours at ambient temperature. The particles were then allowed to settle and the alkaline solution was decanted and then 1.4 liters of HPLC-grade water was added to the flask followed by settling and decanting. Then 200 mL of HPLC-grade water was added to the flask and the particles were collected on a Millipore nylon filter with 0.45 micron pores. The collected particles were then washed with 2 aliquots of 200 mL HPLC-grade water followed by 3 aliquots of 200 mL of HPLC-grade methanol. Air was then allowed to pass through the particles until they were free-flowing.
Particles as formed in Example 1 were dry packed into two 1.0 cm i.d.×15 cm stainless steel reactor tubes. Each tube contained 16.3 g of the base modified titania.
One high pressure Waters 590 HPLC pump (obtained from Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.) was used to draw from a glycerin-ethanol reservoir that was continuously sparged with nitrogen. The glycerin (99%) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich. The 190 proof ethanol was obtained from Sigma Aldrich. The mole ratio of the glycerin to ethanol was 1:47. The glycerin-ethanol solution was pumped into a custom designed heat exchanger that was formed by welding together one ⅛th inch o.d. stainless steel tube (Alltech Associates, Deerfield, Ill.) with silver solder such that the heat from the hot effluent from the reactor was exchanged with the one incoming reactant stream (glycerin-ethanol). After the heat exchanger the reactant mixture passed through an electrical preheater that brought the reactants to the desired set point temperature before the mixture entered the independently temperature controlled fixed bed catalytic reactor. Temperature control was achieved using EZ-Zone PM (Watlow, St. Louis, Mo.) temperature controllers. The reactor consisted of wound stainless steel HPLC tubing coupled to a grooved aluminum cylindrical block with an 800 watt Watlow heater in the center of the cylinder. The reactor size was 1 cm×15 cm and included a titania catalyst (80 um/60 Å) and was formed in accordance with example 2 above. The contact time was calculated to be 30 seconds. The backpressure of the system was maintained through the use of a backpressure regulator obtained from Tescom (Elk River, Minn.), after which the fuel was routed to an as-made fuel tank. The reaction conditions for this example are summarized in Table 1 below. The front pressure and back pressure were held at 2250 psi in each case.
The reaction product mixture was assayed using gas chromatography. The separation conditions for GC were: temperature program: 45° C. for 6 min, then increase temperature to 280° C. at 5° C./min, then hold 5 minutes, total running time of 58 minutes, GC column=DB-5 30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 um, head pressure=45 kPa.
The data show that glycerin can be reacted with an alcohol in the presence of a metal oxide catalyst in order to form reaction products that are useful as fuel additives.
Glycerol (99%, Aldrich) and HPLC grade methanol were premixed in a 2 L container. The reaction mixture was continuously sparged with nitrogen gas and pumped through a reactor (set-up as described above in Example 3) at 15.2 mL/min to maintain a 30 second contact time with the catalyst (15 cm×1 cm column, titania (80 micron/60 Å)). Temperatures were as described in Table 2 below. Front pressure and back pressure were both 2300 psi.
Samples were collected and then analyzed by gas chromatography (GC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (1HNMR).
GC Analysis
GC analysis was performed using an HP5890 and DB-5 GC column (30 mm×0.25 mm×0.25 um) the head pressure was set to 45 kPa and the temperature was programmed to 40° C. for 5 min, increasing to 180° C. at 15° C./min, increasing to 270° C. at 7° C./min and holding for 5 minutes. The total runtime was 32 minutes.
The GC spectra revealed a complex mixture of compounds. The majority of compounds appear to be volatile and polar in nature. The data is shown in
The reaction at 350° C. displayed volatile compounds, some semi to non-volatile components and unreacted glycerol. The chemical compounds determined in this fraction included dimethyl ether (DME), acetone, dimethoxy methane, methyl acetate, 2-butanone, methyl propionate, 2,2-dimethoxy acetone, acrolein dimethyl acetal, propionaldehyde dimethyl acetal, 3-methoxy propanal, crotonaldehyde dimethyl acetal, and 2,2-dimethoxy butanone.
The reaction at 370° C. displayed volatile compounds, an increase in the amounts of semi- to non-volatile components and only a small amount of unreacted glycerol. The chemical compounds determined in this fraction included dimethyl ether, ethanol, acetone, allyl alcohol, acetoin, 2-butanone, methyl propionate, 2,2-dimethoxy acetone, acrolein dimethyl acetal, propionaldehyde dimethyl acetal, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, and methyl lactate.
GC-MS Analysis
Both samples were distilled and the distillate was captured in a cold trap. GC-MS analysis was conducted on the collected distillate to determine the volatile products present. GC-MS was also conducted on the non-volatile fraction. A sample of the 370° C. products was placed in a round bottom flask and the volatile portion removed by rotary evaporation at 50° C. and 20 mmHg. The residue was analyzed by GC-MS on an HP 6890 using a mass cutoff of 37. This cutoff effectively removes methanol from the spectrum allowing for analysis of the peaks that would otherwise co-elute with the methanol or be suppressed by low signal-to-noise.
Volatile Separation Conditions: The HP6890 was used with the following settings: flow rate 0.5 mL/min, split injection 20:1, DB-5 column, a temperature program was used: 35° C. for 5 minutes, increased to 45° C. at 5°/min and held for 2 minutes, increased to 180° C. at 20° C./min and held for 5 minutes. The total runtime was 22.75 minutes.
Non-Volatile Separation Conditions: The HP6890 was used with the following settings: flow rate 0.5 mL/min, split injection 20:1, DB-5 column, temperature was programmed to 50° C. for 5 minutes, increased to 95° C. at 10° C./min and held for 5 minutes, increased to 280° C. at 10° C./min and held for 10 minutes. The total runtime was 43 minutes.
The data generated from GC-MS analysis are shown in Table 3 below (peaks are labeled based on the highest probability NIST hit).
The GC-MS spectra for the 350° C. products show that the formation of acetals are favorable at high glycerol concentrations. There was acrolein formation but it is trapped by methanol, either by dimethyl acetal formation or by 1,4 addition of methanol to yield to 3-methoxy propanal.
The GC-MS spectra of the non-volatile portion of 370° C. products included methyl lactate as the dominating component.
1H NMR Analysis
Only the non-volatile portion of the 370° C. products were analyzed by 1H NMR. NMR spectra were recorded using a Varian 300 MHz instrument. The residue was dissolved in CDCl3 containing TMS as an internal reference.
Due to the number of compounds present in the samples, the 1H NMR spectrum of the non-volatile fraction of the 370° C. products was very complicated, but did provide a “chemical fingerprint” of the compounds produced in the reaction. 3-methoxy propanal and methyl lactate were identified by chemical shift analysis.
The invention has been described with reference to various specific and preferred embodiments and techniques. However, it should be understood that many variations and modifications may be made while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention.
It should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
It should also be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the phrase “configured” describes a system, apparatus, or other structure that is constructed or configured to perform a particular task or adopt a particular configuration to. The phrase “configured” can be used interchangeably with other similar phrases such as arranged and configured, constructed and arranged, constructed, manufactured and arranged, and the like.
All publications and patent applications in this specification are indicative of the level of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated by reference.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/103,513, filed Oct. 7, 2008, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2383632 | Trent | Aug 1945 | A |
| 2679471 | Ayers et al. | May 1954 | A |
| 3383396 | Cahn et al. | May 1968 | A |
| 4138336 | Mendel et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4216337 | Baba et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4487933 | Mixan et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4582589 | Ushizawa et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4716218 | Chen et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4861739 | Pellet et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4891459 | Knight et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 5108597 | Funkenbusch et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108897 | Steinetz et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5179219 | Priegnitz | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5182016 | Funkenbusch et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5252762 | Denton et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254262 | Funkenbusch et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5271833 | Funkenbusch et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5298650 | Walter et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5308365 | Kesling et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5321197 | Angstadt et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5346619 | Funkenbusch et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350879 | Engel et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5508457 | Bayense et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5532392 | Gheorghiu | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540834 | Carr et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5908946 | Stern et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6090959 | Hirano et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6211390 | Peter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6376701 | Chavan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6392062 | Haas | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6407269 | Kaita et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6433146 | Cheryan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6489496 | Barnhorst et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6538146 | Turck | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6666074 | Gerner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6712867 | Boocock | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6719815 | Nanninga et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6768015 | Luxem et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6878837 | Bournay et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887283 | Ginosar et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6960672 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6963004 | Ahtchi-Ali et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6965044 | Hammond et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6979426 | Teall et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982340 | Mumura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7045100 | Ergun et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7097770 | Lysenko | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7112688 | Tysinger et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7126032 | Aiken | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7138536 | Bournay et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7145026 | Fleisher | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7151187 | Delfort et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7211681 | Furuta | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7309592 | Offerman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312355 | Canos et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321052 | Miller et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7371308 | Hackl et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| RE40419 | Norbeck et al. | Jul 2008 | E |
| 7438785 | Meier et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7498454 | Redlingshoefer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7507846 | Pelly | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514575 | Ginosar et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7563915 | Matson | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7582784 | Banavali et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7592470 | Lacome et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7601858 | Cantrell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7666234 | Ghosh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7678163 | Brummerstedt Iversen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7696376 | Furuta | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7754643 | Srinivas et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7790651 | Lin | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7851643 | Hillion et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7857872 | Krasutsky et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7880043 | Chapus et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7897798 | Mcneff | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7943791 | McNeff | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8008516 | Cantrell et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8017796 | McNeff et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8022258 | Myllyoja et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 20040074760 | Portnoff et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050064577 | Berzin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080280 | Yoo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118409 | McNeff et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204612 | Connemann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239182 | Berzin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260553 | Berzin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274065 | Portnoff et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060288636 | Iijima et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070196892 | Winsness et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238905 | Arredondo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283619 | Hillion et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080188676 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080197052 | McNeff et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318763 | Anderson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090029445 | Eckelberry et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100087670 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170143 | McNeff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170147 | McNeff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191004 | McNeff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110060153 | McNeff et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172450 | Mcneff et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184201 | Mcneff | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 8202429 | Nov 1983 | BR |
| 1680514 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 1718679 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 1858160 | Nov 2006 | CN |
| 1887417 | Jan 2007 | CN |
| 1928016 | Mar 2007 | CN |
| 102005038137 | Feb 2007 | DE |
| 0198243 | Oct 1986 | EP |
| 0507217 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0535290 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 1505048 | Feb 2005 | EP |
| 1580255 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1607467 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1681281 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 2188612 | Jan 1974 | FR |
| 2679471 | Jan 1993 | FR |
| 2890656 | Mar 2007 | FR |
| 2132222 | Jul 1984 | GB |
| 6313188 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 11228494 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2005126346 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2005177722 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2007153943 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007190450 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2008111085 | May 2008 | JP |
| WO-0005327 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-03062358 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03087279 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO-03094598 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004085585 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004096962 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005000782 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005021697 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005035479 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005093015 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005123890 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006070661 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006081644 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006088254 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006093896 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006094986 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007011343 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007012190 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007025360 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007029851 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007038605 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007043062 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007072972 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007077950 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007111604 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007140395 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007141293 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007142983 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008012275 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008019325 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008034109 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008029132 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008041038 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008101032 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-09002880 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009007234 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010144597 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Pariente et al., Etherification of glycerol with ethanol over solid acid catalysts, 2008, Green Chem., 11, 1256-1261. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2008/053883, mailed Jul. 9, 2008 (pp. 1-13). |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2007/075211, mailed Jul. 9, 2008 (pp. 1-14). |
| “EP Communication, EPO form 2906 01.91TRI, from the European Patent Office in EP Patent Application No. 07840692.3, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/833,839, mailed Dec. 11, 2009, (pp. 1-4)”. |
| “EP Communication, EPO form 2906 01.91TRI, from the European Patent Office in EP Patent Application No. 08729792.5, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,801, mailed Mar. 2, 2010, (pp. 1-4)”. |
| “Kyte Centrifuge Sales & Consulting”, www.kcentrifuge.com , p. 1. |
| “Non Final Office Action”, mailed Sep. 1, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,507, “Methods and Compositions for Refining Lipid Feed Stocks” (5 pages). , 5. |
| “Non Final Office Action”, mailed Sep. 20, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,751, “Methods and Apparatus for Producing Alkyl Esters From Lipid Feed Stocks and Systems Including Same” (5 pages) , 5. |
| “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2010/038000, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/797,393, mailed Oct. 4, 2010, pp. 1-13”. |
| “PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, From International Application No. PCT/US2007/075211, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/833,839, mailed Feb. 19, 2009, pp. 1-9. |
| “PCT Notificaiton Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, From International Application No. PCT/US2008053883, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,801, mailed Aug. 27, 2009, pp. 1-9. |
| “Response to European Communication pursuant to Article 94 (3) EPC, dated Dec. 11, 2009, Filed in the European Patent Office on Jun. 16, 2010 for EP Patent Application No. 07840692.3, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/833,839, (1-12)”. |
| Annen, et al., “Development of Porous Zirconia Spheres by Polymerization-Induced Colloid Aggregation-Effect of Polymerization Rate”, Journal of Mater. Sci., 29(23):6123-6130 (1994). |
| Anon, , “Beatrice Biodiesel Selects Axens Exterfip-H Technology”, Biodiesel Magazine Jun. 2006 , Unkown. |
| BCC Research, , “Global Market for Catalyst Regeneration”, MarketResearch.com http://www.marketresearch.com/product/display.asp?productid=1354464 2006, 1-20. |
| Blackwell, J. A. et al., “A Chromatographic Study of the Lewis Acid-Base Chemistry of Zirconia Surfaces”, J. Liquid Chromatog. 1991 , 14: 2875-2889. |
| Blackwell, J. A. et al., “Study of the Fluoride Adsorption Characterisitics of Porous Microparticulate Zirconium Oxide”, J. Chromatog. 1991 , 549: 43-57. |
| Bournay, L. et al., “New Heterogeneous Process for Biodiesel Production: A Way to Improve the Quality and the Value of the Crude Glycerin Produced by Biodiesel Plants”, Catalysis Today 2005 , 106: 190-192. |
| Brown, Adrian S. et al., “Sulfated Metal Oxide Catalysts: Superactivity through Superacidity?”, Green Chemistry Feb. 1999 , 17-20. |
| Bryan, Tom , “Adsorbing It All”, Biodiesel Magazine Mar. 2005 , 40-43. |
| Cao, W. et al., “Preparation of Biodiesel from Soybean Oil Using Supercritical Methanol and Co-Solvent”, Fuel 2005 , 84: 347-351. |
| Collins, K. , “Statement of Keith Collins, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture before the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, and Related Agencies: Economic Issues Related to Biofuels.”, Unknown www.usda.gov/documents/Farmbill07energy.doc. Aug. 26, 2006 , 1-8 (web). |
| Dean, Morgan et al., “Nanocrystalline Metal Oxide-Based Catalysts for Biodiesel Production from Soybean Oil”, #96—Student Poster Session: Catalysis & Reaction Engineering (04016) http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2006/techprogram/P78366.HTM Nov. 13, 2006 , 1 (web). |
| Demirbas, Ayhan , “Biodiesel fuels from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical alcohol transesterifications and other methods: a survey”, Energy Conversion & Management 2003 , issue 44 pp. 2093-2109. |
| Di Serio, et al., “Synthesis of Biodiesel via Homogeneous Lewis Acid Catalyst”, J. Molec. Catal. A Chem. 2005 , 239: 111-115. |
| Di Serio, M. et al., “Transesterification of Soybean Oil to Biodiesel by Using Heterogeneous Basic Catalysts”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006 , 45: 3009-3014. |
| Dorsa, Renato et al., “Basics of Alkali Refining of Vegetable Oils”, GEA Westfalia Separator Food Tec GmbH Unknown , 1-28. |
| Dunlap, C. J. et al., “Zirconia Stationary Phases for Extreme Separations”, Anal. Chem. 2001 , 73: 598A-607A. |
| Elliott, Brian , “Low-cost Biodiesel Production Process Using Waste Oils and Fats”, U.S. EPA SBIR Phase I Kick-Off Meeting www.iastate.edu/Inside/2003/0613/biorenewable.jpg Apr. 5, 2007 , 1. |
| Fabbri, D. et al., ““Dimethyl carbonate as anovel methylating reagent for fatty acidsin analytical pyrolysis””, Journal of Chromatography, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, NL LNKDDOI: I0.I016/J.CHROMA.2004.12.077 Feb. 18, 2005. |
| Furuta, S. et al., “Biodiesel Fuel Production with Solid Superacid Catalysis is Fixed Bed Reactor Under Atmospheric Pressure”, Catalysis Communications 2004 , 5: 721-723. |
| Gercel, H. F. et al., “Hydropyrolysis of Extracted Euphorbia rigida in a Well-Swept Fixed-Bed Tubular Reactor”, Energy Sources 2002 , 24: 423-430. |
| Goering, C. E. et al., “Fuel Properties of Eleven Vegetable Oils”, Trans ASAE 1982 , 25: 1472-1477. |
| Goodwin, J. G. , “Research Activities: Biodiesel Synthesis”, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Clemson University http://www.ces.clemson.edu/chemeng/facultypages/goodwin/research.html 2006 , 1-5. |
| Haas, M. J. et al., “Engine Performance of Biodiesel Fuel Prepared from Soybean Soapstack: A High Quality Renewable Fuel Produced from a Waste Feedstock”, Energy Fuels 2001 , 15: 1207-1212. |
| Haas, M. J. et al., “Improving the Economics of Biodiesel Production Through the Use of Low Value Lipids as Feedstocks: Vegetable Oil soapstock”, Fuel Process. Technol. 2005 , 86: 1087-1096. |
| Harvey, A. P. et al., “Process Intensification of Biodiesel Production Using a Continuous Oscillatory Flow Reactor”, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2003 , 78: 338-341. |
| He, Chen et al., “Biodiesel from Transesterification of Cotton Seed Oil by Solid Bases Catalysis”, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities Aug. 2006 , No. 4 vol. 20. |
| He, Chen et al., “Biodiesel Production by the transesterification of cottonseed oil by solid acid catalysts”, Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China Feb. 2006 , vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1673-7369. |
| Henry, R. A. et al., “A Novel Chemical Route to Stable, Regenerable Zirconia-Based Chiral Stationary Phases for HPLC”, American Laboratory (News Edition) 2005 , 37: 22-24. |
| Heyerdahl, Petter H. et al., “Hydrothermal Treatment and Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis of Biomass for Bio-fuel Production-Progress Report”, Presentation at UMB and UMN 2006 , pp. 1-45. |
| Hill, J. et al., “Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels”, PNAS 2006 , 103(30): 11206-11210. |
| Iijima, Wataru et al., ““Winterized” Bio-Diesel Fuel Produced from Animal Fat”, Agro-Energy Laboratory, Dept. of Farm Mechanization and Engineering,National Agricultural ResearchCentre, National Agricultural Research Organization, Japan Unknown , 1-2. |
| Iijima, Wataru et al., “The Non-glycerol Process of Biodiesel Fuel Treated in Supercritical Methanol (Abstract)”, Paper No. 046073, 2004 ASAE Annual Meeting 2004 , 1. |
| Ishihara, K. et al., “Direct Ester Condensation from a 1:1 Mixture of Carboxylic Acids and Alcohols Catalyzed by Hafnium (IV) or Zirconium (IV) Salts.”, Tetrahedron 2002 , 58: 8179-8188. |
| Kahn, A. , “Research into Biodiesel Catalyst Screening and Development”, Thesis, University of Queensland Brisbane 2002 , 1-41. |
| Kiss, Anton A. et al., “Solid Acid Catalysts for Biodiesel Production—Towards Sustainable Energy”, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006 , 348: 75-81. |
| Knothe, G. , “Analytical Methods Used in the Production and Fuel Quality Assessment of Biodiesel”, Transactions of the ASAE 2001 , 44(2): 193-200. |
| Knothe, Gerhard et al., “Bidiesel: The Use of Vegetable Oils and Their Derivatives as Alternative Diesel Fuels”, Oil Chemical Research, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agricultural, Peoria, IL 61604 Unknown , 1-36. |
| Koh, Ashley D. , “Non-Catalytic Biodiesel Production from Soybean Oil Using Supercritical Methanol”, The 2006 Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2006/techprogram/P69978.HTM presented Nov. 15, 2006 , 1. |
| Kulkarni, Mangesh G. et al., “Solid Acid Catalyxed Biodiesel Production by Simultaneous Esterification and Transesterification”, Green Chem. 2006 , 8: 1056-1062. |
| Kulkarni, M. et al., “Waste Cooking Oil: An Economical Source for Biodiesel”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006 , 45: 2901-2913. |
| Liu, Yijun et al., “Transesterification of Poultry Fat with Methanol Using Mg-Al Hydrotalcite Derived Catalysts”, Applied Catalysis A: General (Abstract only) 2007 , vol. 331, 138-148. |
| Lopez, Dora E. et al., “Esterification and transesterification on tungstated zirconia: Effect of calcination temperature”, Journal or Catalysis Apr. 1, 2007 , vol. 247, Iss. 1, 43-50. |
| Lopez, D.E. et al., “Transesterification of Triacetin with Methanol on Solid Acid and Base Catalysts”, Appl. Catalysis A: General 2005 , 295: 97-105. |
| Lotero, E. et al., “Synthesis of Biodiesel Via Acid Catalysis”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005 , 44:5353-5363. |
| Ma, R et al., “Biodiesel Production: A Review”, Bioresource Technol. 1999 , 70:1-15. |
| Melero, Juan A. et al., “Acidic Mesoporous Silica for the Acetylation of Glycerol: Synthesis of Bioadditives to Petrol Fuel”, Energy & Fuels 2007 , 21: pp. 1782-1791. |
| Miller, Dennis J. et al., “Catalysis for Biorenewables Conversion”, National Science Foundation Workshop Report www.egr.msu.edu/apps/nsfworkshop Apr. 13, 2004 , 1-63 (web). |
| Mittelbach, Martin et al., “Diesel Fuel Derived from Vegetable Oils, III. Emission Tests Using Methyl Esters of Used Frying Oil”, JAOCS Jul. 1988 , vol. 65, No. 7, 1185-1187. |
| Nawrocki, J. et al., “Chemistry of Zirconia and Its Use in Chromatography”, J. Chromatog. 1993 , A 657: 229-282. |
| Omota, F. et al., “Fatty Acid Esterification by Reactive Distillation: Part 2—Kinetics-based Design for Sulphated Zirconia Catalysts”, Chemical Engineering Science 2003 , 58: 3175-3185. |
| Ondrey, G. , “Biodiesel Production Using a Heterogeneous Catalyst”, Chemical Engineering 2004 , 111(11):13. |
| Otera, J. , “Transesterification”, Chem. Rev. 1993 , 93:1449-1470. |
| Peterson, C. L. et al., “Continuous Flow Biodiesel Production”, Appl. Eng. Agricul. 2002 , 18: 5-11. |
| Pinto, A. C. et al., “Biodiesel: An Overview”, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005 , 16: 1313-1330. |
| Pruszko, R. , “Strategic Biodiesel Decisions”, Iowa State University—University Extension CIRAS 2006 , 1-32. |
| Raddi De Araujo, Lucia R. et al., “H3PO4/AI2O3 Catatysts: Characterization and Catalytic Evaluation of Oleic Acid Conversion to Biofuels and Biolubricant”, Materials Research 2006 , vol. 9, No. 2, 181-184. |
| Reisch, Marc S. , “Start-up Firms Pursue Biofuels”, Chemical & Engineering News Nov. 20, 2006 , vol. 84, No. 47 , 1-2(web). |
| Rigney, M. P. et al., “Physical and Chemical Characterization of Microporous Zirconia”, J. Chromatog 1990 , 499: 291-304. |
| Robichaud, Michael J. et al., “An Improved Oil Emulsion Synthesis Method for Large, Porous Zirconia Particles for Packed- or Fluidized-Bed Protein Chromatography”, Separation Science and Technology 1997 , 32(15), pp. 2547-2559. |
| Ruan, Roger et al., “Size matters: small distributed biomass energy production systems for economic viability”, Int J Agric & Biol Eng Aug. 2008 , vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 64-68. |
| Schuchardt, Ulf et al., “Transesterification of Vegetable Oils: a Review”, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1998 , vol. 9, No. 1, 199-210. |
| Silva, Lisa et al., “Colorado Diesel School Bus Retrofit Program”, A Cooperative Effort of the Regional Air Quality Council and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 2006 , 1-17. |
| Suppes, G. J. et al., “Transesterification of Soybean Oil with Zeolite and Metal Catalysts”, Applied Catalysis A: General 2004 , 257: 213-223. |
| Suwannakarn, Kaewta et al., “A comparative study of gas phase esterification on solid acid catalysts”, Catalysis Letters Apr. 2007 , vol. 114, Nos. 3-4, 1-7. |
| Tyson, K. S. , “Brown Grease Feedstocks for Biodiesel”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Jun. 19, 2002 , 1-34. |
| Unknown, “AMBERLITEtm FP Ion Exchange Resins”, Amberlite FP technical bulletin http://www.advancedbiosciences.com Dec. 2004 , 1-7. |
| Unknown, et al., “Oak Ridge lab develops materials for biodiesel catalysis”, Biodiesel Magazine http://biodieselmagazine.com/article-print.jsp?article—id=1580 2007 , 1. |
| Unknown, , “Standard Test Method for Acid Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Titration”, ASTM International, Designation: D664-04 Mar. 2004 , 1-7. |
| Verkade, J. G. et al., “Nanoporous Solid Catalysts for Conversion of Soybean Oil to Biodiesel”, Center for Catalysis, Iowa State University http://www.iprt.iastate.edu/ccat/nano.html Feb. 22, 2006 , 1-4. |
| Vieitez, Ignacio et al., “Continuous Production of Soybean Biodiesel in Supercritical Ethanol-Water Mixtures”, American Chemical Society, Energy & Fuels Jun. 17, 2008 , pp. 1-5. |
| Xie, W. et al., “Synthesis of Biodiesel from Soybean Oil Using Heterogeneous KF/ZnO Catalyst”, Catalyst Letters Feb. 2006 , 107: 53-59. |
| Yokoyama, Shin-Ya et al., “Liquid Fuel Production from Ethanol Fermentation Stillage”, Chemistry Letters 1986 , pp. 649-652. |
| Yu, Fei et al., “LIquefaction of Corn Cobs with Supercritical Water Treatment”, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2007 , vol. 50(1): 175-180. |
| Yu, Fei et al., “Liquefaction of Corn Stover and Preparation of Polyester from the Liquefied Polyol”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2006 , vol. 129-132, pp. 574-585. |
| Yu, Fei et al., “Physical and Chemical Properties of Bio-Oils From Microwave Pyrolysis of Corn Stover”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2007 , vol. 136-140, pp. 957-970. |
| Yu, Fei et al., “Reaction Kinetics of Stover Liquefaction in Recycled Stover Polyol”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2006 , vol. 129-132 pp. 563-573. |
| Zhang, P. , “A New Process for Biodiesel Production Based on Waste Cooking Oils and Heterogeneous Catalysts”, USDA-SBIR Agreement #2005-33610-15497 2005 , 1-2. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100170143 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61103513 | Oct 2008 | US |
