Catalytic caustic desulfonylation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11008522
  • Patent Number
    11,008,522
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 11, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 18, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A caustic desulfonylation method and system comprising a reactor vessel with a solid carbonaceous selectivity promoter provided therein, a liquid feed input of the reactor vessel configured to receive a source of caustic, a hydrocarbon feed comprising oxidized sulfur containing compounds and a gas feed input of the reactor vessel configured to receive a source of hydrogen. The caustic desulfonylation method and system further includes an output of the reactor vessel releasing the caustic and an upgraded hydrocarbon product with sulfur content less than the sulfur content of the hydrocarbon feed received by the liquid feed of the reactor vessel.
Description
FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY

The following relates generally to methods and systems for performing caustic desulfonylation, and more specifically to in-situ regenerable caustic desulfonylation methods and systems.


BACKGROUND

Heavy oils and bitumens make up an increasing percentage of hydrocarbon resources. As the demand for hydrocarbon-based fuels has increased, a corresponding need has developed for improved processes for desulfurizing oil feed streams. Processes for the conversion of the heavy portions of these feed streams into more valuable, lighter fuel products have also taken on greater importance. These heavy oil feed streams include, but are not limited to, whole and reduced petroleum crudes, shale oils, coal liquids, atmospheric and vacuum residua, asphaltene, de-asphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, including atmospheric and vacuum gas oils and coker gas oils, light to heavy distillates including raw virgin distillates, hydrocrackers, hydrotreated oils, dewaxed oils, slack waxes, raffinates, and mixtures thereof.


Hydrocarbon streams having a boiling point above 220° C. often contain a considerable amount of large multi-ring hydrocarbon molecules and/or a conglomerated association of large molecules. These larger molecules and conglomerations often contain a large portion of the sulfur, nitrogen and metals in the hydrocarbon stream, which may be referred to as heteroatom contaminants in U.S. Pat. No. 8,764,973 to Litz et al., the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, except where inconsistent with the content of the current disclosure. A significant portion of the sulfur contained in these heavy oils is in the form of heteroatoms in polycyclic aromatic molecules, comprised of sulfur compounds such as dibenzothiophenes, from which the sulfur is difficult to remove.


The processing of bitumens, crude oils, or other heavy oils with large numbers of multi-ring aromatics and/or asphaltenes can pose a variety of challenges. Conventional hydroprocessing methods can be effective at improving API for a heavy oil feed, but the hydrogen consumption can be substantial. Conversion of the liquid to less valuable products, such as coke, can be another concern with conventional techniques. Desulfurizing techniques and systems which have been disclosed by others including those systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,845 to Vann et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,696,890 to Soto et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 8,673,132 to Leta et al., react unoxidized sulfur at high temperatures to cause thermal cracking reactions in oil. Cracking reactions convert unoxidized sulfur compounds to H2S, resulting in the production of olefins and increases in the aromaticity which may be undesirable.


There is thus a need for a system and method for desulfurization that is capable of at least one of removing oxidized sulfur containing compounds such as sulfones, operating at lower temperatures to avoid thermal cracking reactions, producing non-ionizable hydrocarbon products while having reactants that are easily regenerated in-situ.


SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGY

A first embodiment of this disclosure relates generally to a caustic desulfonylation system comprising: a reactor vessel with a solid carbonaceous selectivity promoter provided therein; a liquid feed input of the reactor vessel configured to receive a source of caustic, a hydrocarbon feed comprising oxidized sulfur containing compounds and; a gas feed input of the reactor vessel configured to receive a source of hydrogen; and an output of the reactor vessel, wherein said output releases the caustic, and an upgraded hydrocarbon product with a sulfur content less than the sulfur content of the hydrocarbon feed received by the liquid feed of the reactor vessel.


A second embodiment of this disclosure relates generally to a method for performing a caustic desulfonylation reaction comprising the steps of: providing a reactor vessel, said reactor vessel; placing, within the reactor vessel, a solid selectivity promoter made of carbonaceous material; receiving, by the reactor vessel, a hydrocarbon feed comprising a oxidized sulfur compound, a caustic and hydrogen gas; contacting the solid selectivity promoter with the hydrocarbon feed and caustic in the presence of hydrogen gas; producing an upgraded hydrocarbon product with a sulfur content less than the sulfur content of the hydrocarbon feed; and regenerating the selectivity promoter with the hydrogen gas.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1a depicts a flowchart describing an embodiment of a caustic desulfonylation treatment of a sulfone and/or sulfoxide rich hydrocarbon feed; and



FIG. 1b depicts a flow chart of an embodiment of oxidative desulfurization of a hydrocarbon feed using embodiments of caustic desulfonylation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

Although certain embodiments are shown and described in detail, it should be understood that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the appended claims. The scope of the present disclosure will in no way be limited to the number of constituting components, the materials thereof, the shapes thereof, the relative arrangement thereof, etc., and are disclosed simply as an example of embodiments of the present disclosure. Reference will now be made in detail to certain embodiments of the disclosed methods and systems, examples of which are illustrated in part in the accompanying drawings and Examples below, which are provided for illustrative purposes intended for those skilled in the art and are not meant to be limiting in any way. For simplicity and clarity of illustration, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.


As a preface to the detailed description, it should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1a, depicts a flow chart describing a system 100 and method for performing a caustic desulfonylation reaction consistent with the embodiments described herein. One or more alternative embodiments of the caustic desulfonylation system have been described and may be used as an alternative to the arrangement described in this application, so long as they are consistent with the disclosure here. For example, desulfonylation systems and equipment used to perform desulfonylation reactions described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,298,404 and 8,877,013 to Litz. et al., US Publication No. 2015/0337208 to Litz et al. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,197,671 and 8,894,843 to Rankin et al. are hereby incorporated by reference. Embodiments of the caustic desulfonylation systems and methods described herein may be performed within a reactor vessel 108. The reactor vessel 108 may be an oil/caustic reactor vessel, a promoted caustic visbreaker or a sulfone management unit in some embodiments. The reactor vessel 108 may be constructed out of any material suitable to withstand the basic conditions of the caustics being supplied to the reactor vessel 108. Examples of materials which may be suitable for constructing a reactor vessel may include iron, nickel, cobalt, and chromium based alloys and/or stainless steel alloys.


The reactor vessel 108 of the caustic desulfonylation system 100 may be configured to receive an oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 comprising one or more oxidized sulfur containing species provided therein and/or one or more heteroatoms-containing hydrocarbons. Additional heteroatom containing compounds that may be present in the oxidized hydrocarbon stream may comprise oxidized sulfur components such as sulfoxide and sulfone rich hydrocarbons, as well as other compounds including, but not limited to those compounds comprising oxygen, nitrogen, nickel, vanadium, iron and other transition metals of the periodic table and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 may be referred to as an oxidized heteroatom-containing hydrocarbon stream 111. The source of the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 may be connected to a liquid feed input (not shown) of the reactor vessel 108 allowing for the oxidized hydrocarbon stream to flow or be pumped into the reactor vessel 108 in either a metered or continuous fashion.


Inside the reactor vessel 108, the reactor vessel 108 may be provided with a solid selectivity promoter located therein. A solid selectivity promoter may refer to a substance in the solid state of matter that allows for a desulfonylation reaction to favor the production of reaction products that are non-ionizable hydrocarbon products and/or non-oxygenated hydrocarbon products. For example, the presence of a solid selectivity promoter in the reaction vessel 108 during a desulfonylation reaction may allow for the reaction to favor the production of biphenyl hydrocarbons as the dominant reaction product when dibenzothiophene sulfones are reacted. The solid selectivity promoter favors the non-ionized hydrocarbons over alternative reaction products formed by oxidized sulfur compounds such as ortho-phenyl phenolic compounds which may feature ionizable, oxygen containing hydrocarbon that may be the dominant reaction product when the solid selectivity promoter is not present. Embodiments of the solid selectivity promoter may be any solid substance that is chemically stable under the harsh basic conditions of the desulfonylation reaction and under temperatures up to about 350° C. In the exemplary embodiment, the solid selectivity promoter may be a carbonaceous material including but not limited to activated carbon, graphite, graphene, coal or asphaltenes or combinations thereof.


Embodiments of the solid selectivity promoter may be advantageous over selectivity promoters provided as a liquid or in solution because a solid selectivity promoter may remain inside the reactor vessel 108 both during and after the desulfonylation reaction has completed. Carbonaceous materials have excellent chemical resistance, and very high melting points. Carbonaceous materials are rarely used as catalysts for reactions, but a solid carbonaceous material may be more effective than comparative liquid selectivity promoters and have the ability to be regenerated in-situ by hydrogen which is unusual, unexpected and highly beneficial. The carbonaceous material disclosed herein effectively promotes the selectivity of the reaction to more valuable, non-ionizable hydrocarbons (e.g. dibenzothiophene sulfone to biphenyl).


Using a solid selectivity promoter and allowing it to remain inside the reactor vessel 108 may be advantageous over liquid or solutions comprising a selectivity promoter. Liquids and solutions comprising selectivity promoters may be eluted from the reactor vessel during the desulfonylation reaction, and may require further separation and recycling steps. Instead of being removed from the reactor vessel 108 and require further separation and recycling, a solid selectivity promoter may be regenerated inside the reactor vessel 108. In some embodiments, the solid selectivity promoter may further be advantageous because the solid selectivity promoter may be continuously regenerated in-situ during the desulfonylation reaction, ensuring that that the solid selectivity promoter may not be entirely used up during a continuous desulfonylation reaction.


Embodiments of the solid selectivity promoter may be regenerated by contacting the solid selectivity promoter with hydrogen gas 117. For example, in some embodiments of the desulfonylation system 100 described herein, the interior of the reactor vessel 108 containing the solid selectivity promoter may be pressurized with hydrogen gas 117. Embodiments of the reactor vessel 108 may include a gas feed input connected to a source of hydrogen gas 117. The hydrogen gas 117 may subsequently be metered or pumped into the reactor vessel 108 through the gas feed input until the reactor vessel has been pressurized. The pressure of the hydrogen provided within the reactor vessel 108 may range from atmospheric pressure up to about 1000 psig in some embodiments and more specifically between about 400-600 psig in alternative embodiments. In the exemplary embodiments the reactor vessel 108 may be provided with hydrogen gas to a pressure of about 200-500 psig.


Embodiments of the desulfonylation system may further comprise a caustic compound 110 being provided to the reactor vessel 108 in order to perform a desulfonylation reaction. The embodiments of the caustic compound 110 may be provided to the reactor vessel 108 by connecting a source of a caustic compound 110 to a liquid feed input of the reactor vessel 108. In some embodiments, the liquid feed receiving the caustic compound 110 may be a separate liquid feed from the liquid feed input receiving the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111. In those instances where the caustic compound 110 and the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 each enter the reactor vessel 108 at a different liquid feed input, the liquid feed input may be referred to as a first liquid feed input, second liquid feed input, etc.


Embodiments of the caustic compound 110 being delivered to the liquid feed input of the reactor vessel 108 may be any inorganic compound that exhibits basic properties. Inorganic basic compounds may include, but are not limited to, inorganic oxides from group IA and IIA elements of the periodic table, inorganic hydroxides from group IA and IIA elements, or optionally mixtures of oxides and hydroxides of group IA and IIA elements, molten hydroxides of group IA and IIA elements, or optionally mixtures of hydroxides of said elements. Specific examples of the caustic compound (optionally at about 50% weight in water) may include Li2O, Na2O, K2O, Rb2O, Cs2O, Fr2O, B2O, MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO, and the like as well as LiOH, NaOH, KOH, RbOH, CsOH, FrOH, Be(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, Ca(OH)2, Sr(OH)2, Ba(OH)2, green liquor, mixtures or molten mixtures thereof.


As shown in FIG. 1a, a desulfonylation reaction may occur when the reactants comprising the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 and the caustic 110 each enter the reactor vessel 108 where they mix under the pressure of the hydrogen gas 117 and make contact with the solid selectivity promoter present in the reactor vessel 108. The temperature of the reaction vessel 108 may be maintained during the desulfonylation reaction at approximately about 200-500° C. and in the exemplary embodiments between about 275-300° C. As a result of the desulfonylation reaction, a mixture of one or more reaction products may exit the reactor vessel 108 via route 114 of the desulfonylation system 100, from an output of the reaction vessel 108. The mixture of one or more reaction products exiting the reactor vessel 108 may include an upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 which may be non-ionized hydrocarbon product, as well as the caustic, water, unconsumed hydrogen gas and sulfur containing compounds, Not intending to be bound by any particular theory, the following net equation generally describes an example of the reagents used and products observed:

2NaOH+R(SO2)R′+H2→H2O+Na2SO3+R—H+R′—H.

In some embodiments, R and R′ may even be further linked as part of a heterocyclic structure, for instance in the example of this reaction provided below:




embedded image


In some embodiments, the mixture of reaction products exiting the output of the reaction vessel via route 114 may further be sent to a separating vessel 115. The separating vessel 115 may be a gravity settler in some embodiments. Inside the separating vessel 115, upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 may separate into a light phase while the water, sulfur containing compounds, residual caustic and reaction by-products may separate into a heavier dense phase 116. Subsequently, the light phase comprising the upgraded hydrocarbon products 120 can be removed and isolated from the dense phase 116. In alternative embodiments, the reaction vessel 108 may also serve as the separating vessel 115.


In some embodiments, upgraded hydrocarbon products 120 obtained and separated from the separator vessel 115 may be further washed, refined or utilized for gas, oil, fuel, lubricants or other hydrocarbon based products and further treated using known refinery processes. In some embodiments, the upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 may further be washed to remove traces of reaction by-products that may not have fully separated into the dense phase. The removal of the traces of the reaction by-products such as sulfur containing compounds, and excess caustic may be removed using methods including, but not limited to, solvent extraction, washing with water, centrifugation, distillation, vortex separation, and membrane separation and/or combinations thereof. Trace quantities of caustic may also be removed using electrostatic desalting and dewatering techniques according to known methods by those skilled in the art.


Referring to FIG. 1b, in some embodiments the desulfonylation system 100 shown in FIG. 1a may be further incorporated into an oxidative desulfurization system 200 performing one or more oxidation steps to a hydrocarbon stream 101 prior to becoming the oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 entering the reactor vessel 108. The hydrocarbon stream 101 may be combined with an oxidant 104 and subjected to an oxidation reaction inside an oxidizer vessel 102. Embodiments of the oxidation step may be carried out using at least one oxidant, optionally in the presence of a catalyst. Suitable oxidants 104 may include organic peroxides, hydroperoxides, hydrogen peroxide, O2, air, O3, peracetic acid, organic hydroperoxides may include benzyl hydroperoxide, ethylbenzene hydroperoxide, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, cumyl hydroperoxide and mixtures thereof, other suitable oxidants may include sodium hypochlorite, permanganate, biphasic hydrogen peroxide with formic acid, nitrogen containing oxides (e.g. nitrous oxide), and mixtures thereof, with or without additional inert organic solvents.


In an alternative embodiment, the step of oxidation may further include an acid treatment (not shown) including at least one immiscible acid. The immiscible acid and oxidant treatment may remove a portion of the heteroatom contaminants from the feed, wherein upon being oxidized by the immiscible acid and oxidant, the heteroatoms may become soluble in the acid phase, and be subsequently removed via a heteroatom containing by-product stream. The immiscible acid used may be any acid which is insoluble in the hydrocarbon oil phase. Suitable immiscible acids may include, but are not limited to, carboxylic acids, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and mixtures thereof, with or without varying amounts of water as a diluent. Suitable carboxylic acids may include, but are not limited to, formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, lactic acid, benzoic acid, and the like, and mixtures thereof, with or without varying amounts of water as a diluent.


In some embodiments, the oxidation reaction(s) may be carried out at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 120° C., at a pressure of about 0.1 atmospheres to about 10 atmospheres, with a contact time of about 2 minutes to about 180 minutes.


A catalyst may be used in the presence of the oxidant 104. A suitable catalyst may include transition metals including but not limited to Ti(IV), V(V), Mo(VI), W(VI), transition metal oxides, including ZnO, Al2O3, CuO, layered double hydroxides such as ZnAl2O4.x(ZnO)y(Al2O3), organometallic complexes such as CuxZn1-xAl2O4, zeolite, Na2WO4, transition metal aluminates, metal alkoxides, such as those represented by the formula MmOm(OR)n, and polymeric formulations thereof, where M is a transition metal such as, for example, titanium, rhenium, tungsten, copper, iron, zinc or other transition metals, R may be a carbon group having at least 3 carbon atoms, where at each occurrence R may individually be a substituted alkyl group containing at least one OH group, a substituted cycloalkyl group containing at least one OH group, a substituted cycloalkylalkyl group containing at least one OH group, a substituted heterocyclyl group containing at least one OH group, or a heterocyclylalkyl containing at least one OH group. The subscripts m and n may each independently be integers between about 1 and about 8. In some embodiments, R may be substituted with halogens such as F, Cl, Br, and I. For example, embodiments of the metal alkoxide catalyst may include bis(glycerol)oxotitanium(IV)), wherein M is Ti, m is 1, n is 2, and R is a glycerol group. Other examples of metal alkoxides include bis(ethyleneglycol)oxotitanium (IV), bis(erythritol)oxotitanium (IV), bis(sorbitol)oxotitanium (IV).


The sulfoxidation catalyst may further be bound to a support surface. The support surface may include an organic polymer or an inorganic oxide. Suitable inorganic oxides include, but are not limited to, oxides of elements of groups IB, II-A, II-B, III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, V-B, VI-B, of the Periodic Table of the Elements. Examples of oxides that may be used as a support include copper oxides, silicon dioxide, aluminum oxide, and/or mixed oxides of copper, silicon and aluminum. Other suitable inorganic oxides which may be used alone or in combination with the abovementioned oxide supports may be, for example, MgO, ZrO2, TiO2, CaO and/or mixtures thereof. Other supports may include talc.


The support materials used may have a specific surface area in the range from 10 to 1000 m2/g, a pore volume in the range from 0.1 to 5 ml/g and a mean particle size of from 0.1 to 10 cm. Preference may be given to supports having a specific surface area in the range from 0.5 to 500 m2/g, a pore volume in the range from 0.5 to 3.5 ml/g and a mean particle size in the range from 0.5 to 3 cm. Particular preference may be given to supports having a specific surface area in the range from 200 to 400 m2/g, and a pore volume in the range from 0.8 to 3.0 ml/g.


After subjecting the hydrocarbon stream 101 to oxidation conditions in the oxidizer vessel 102, an intermediate stream 106 may be generated. A hydrocarbon feed 101 containing, for example sulfur-based heteroatom contaminants such as thiophenes, benzothiophenes, dibenzothiophenes and thioethers and others may be converted to a sulfone or sulfoxide rich intermediate stream 106. The intermediate hydrocarbon stream 106 may include oxidized heteroatom containing compounds and oxidant by-products. In some embodiments, the intermediate stream 106 may be subjected to distillation 107, for example in a distillation column. During distillation 107, the oxidized heteroatom containing compounds, may be separated from the oxidant by-products 109. The oxidant by-products may be recovered and recycled. As a result of the distillation 107, an oxidized hydrocarbon stream 111 may be formed including oxidized sulfur compounds such as sulfones and sulfoxide rich hydrocarbons. The sulfone and sulfoxide rich hydrocarbon stream 111 may be sent to the reactor vessel 108 to perform the desulfonylation reaction as described above.


Embodiments of methods for performing a caustic desulfonylation reaction, consistent with the desulfonylation system described above may be performed in accordance with the steps described herein. For instance, in some embodiments, the method for performing the caustic desulfonylation reaction may include the step of providing the reactor vessel 108 and placing within the reactor vessel a solid selectivity promoter, such as a solid selectivity promoter made of a carbonaceous material. Embodiments of the method steps may further include the step of receiving, by the reactor vessel 108, a caustic and/or hydrogen gas and an oxidized hydrocarbon feed 111 comprising one or more heteroatom containing compounds which may include oxidized sulfur compounds.


As the reactor vessel 108 is continuously or in a metered fashion, receiving the oxidized hydrocarbon feed 111, caustic 110 and hydrogen gas 117, the oxidized hydrocarbon feed 111, caustic 110 and hydrogen gas 117 may be contacting the solid selectivity promoter. As result of the oxidized hydrocarbon feed 111 and caustic 110 contacting one another in the presence of the solid selectivity promoter, the resulting desulfonylation reaction may be producing an upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 having a reduced heteroatom content. More specifically, the upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 produced may have a sulfur content that is less that the sulfur content of the oxidized hydrocarbon feed 111. Moreover, the resulting upgraded hydrocarbon product 120 produced may be non-ionized hydrocarbon products as described above.


Furthermore, in some embodiments, as the desulfonylation system is performing the desulfonylation reaction inside the reactor vessel 108, simultaneously, or near simultaneously, the hydrogen gas 117 entering the reactor vessel 108 may be continuously regenerating the solid selectivity promoter being utilized as a desulfonylation reactant. In some embodiments, the regenerating step may also be performed by exposing the solid selectivity promoter inside the reactor vessel 108 to the hydrogen gas 117 after the desulfonylation reaction is performed.


The following working examples are provided for illustrative purposes. The working examples are intended to be non-limiting and are intended to further explain and assist in clarifying one or more of the elements of the embodiments described above in the current disclosure:


Example 1. Desulfurization of Sulfoxidized Bitumen

A 1000 mL reactor made of nickel was filled with 43.6 grams of activated carbon (3.6 moles), 45.7 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide in water, 125.7 grams of a bitumen oil containing 4.54% by weight of sulfur which had been previously subjected to sulfoxidation to convert sulfur species to sulfones (0.09 moles sulfones), and 26.6 grams of toluene as a solvent. The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas and then pressurized with 150 psig hydrogen gas (0.32 moles). The reactor was heated to 300° C. and stirred at 600 RPM for 90 minutes. The reactor was then cooled and the oil contents centrifuged to remove any caustic, activated carbon, or reaction by-products. The centrifuged oil was analyzed for sulfur content and density. The sulfur content of the bitumen was reduced by 47% from 4.54% wt sulfur to 2.41% wt sulfur. The density of the bitumen before sulfoxidation was 1.009 g/mL at 15° C., which dropped to 0.9746 g/mL at 15° C. after treatment.


Example 2. Desulfurization of Dibenzothiophene Sulfone

A 300 mL reactor made of nickel was filled with 17.1 grams of activated carbon (1.4250 moles), 17.1 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide in water, 7.7 grams of dibenzothiophene sulfone (0.0356 moles), and 50.2 grams 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene as a solvent. The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas and then pressurized with 200 psig hydrogen gas (0.12 moles). The reactor was heated to 300° C. and stirred at 600 RPM for 90 minutes. The reactor was then cooled and the product was analyzed by HPLC. All of the initial dibenzothiophene sulfone had been converted, with 33.7 mole percent converted to biphenyl and 7.95 mole percent converted to ortho-phenylphenol.


Comparative Example 1. Desulfurization of Dibenzothiophene

An experiment was performed as in example 2, except that an un-sulfoxidized sulfur compound (dibenzothiophene) was used in place of a sulfone compound. A 300 mL reactor made of nickel was filled with 16.9 grams of activated carbon (1.4083 moles), 17.0 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide in water, 6.4 grams of dibenzothiophene (0.0348 moles), and 51.5 grams 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene as a solvent. The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas and then pressurized with 200 psig hydrogen gas (0.12 moles). The reactor was heated to 300° C. and stirred at 600 RPM for 90 minutes. The reactor was then cooled and the product was analyzed by HPLC. Only dibenzothiophene was recovered. The HPLC did not detect any reaction products.


Comparative Example 2. Desulfurization of Dibenzothiophene Sulfone without Carbon Present

An experiment was performed as in example 2, but without activated carbon present. A 300 mL reactor made of nickel was filled with 20.1 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide in water, 9.0 grams of dibenzothiophene sulfone (0.0147 moles), and 53.5 grams 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene as a solvent. The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas and then pressurized with 200 psig hydrogen gas (0.12 moles). The reactor was heated to 300° C. and stirred at 600 RPM for 90 minutes. The reactor was then cooled and the product was analyzed by HPLC. 13.87 mole percent of the initial dibenzothiophene sulfone had been converted, with 4.06 mole percent converted to ortho-phenylphenol and 0 mole percent converted to biphenyl.


Comparative Example 3. Desulfurization of Un-Sulfoxidized Bitumen

An experiment was performed as in example 1, but the bitumen was not subjected to sulfoxidation, so the sulfur in the oil had not been converted to sulfones. A 300 mL reactor made of nickel was filled with 15.0 grams of activated carbon (1.25 moles), 15.5 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide in water, 48.6 grams of a bitumen oil containing 4.54% by weight of sulfur (0.0690 moles sulfur), and 11.8 grams of toluene as a solvent. The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas and then pressurized with 200 psig hydrogen gas (0.14 moles). The reactor was heated to 300° C. and stirred at 600 RPM for 90 minutes. The reactor was then cooled and the oil contents centrifuged to remove any caustic, activated carbon, or reaction by-products. The centrifuged oil was analyzed for sulfur content and density. The sulfur content of the bitumen was only decreased by 5% from 4.54% wt sulfur to 4.32% wt sulfur.


While this disclosure has been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure as set forth above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as required by the following claims. The claims provide the scope of the coverage of the invention and should not be limited to the specific examples provided herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: an oxidizer vessel for oxidizing a hydrocarbon stream and thereby generating an intermediate stream;a distillation column for separating oxidized heteroatom containing compounds from the intermediate stream and thereby generating a distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream; anda reactor vessel for housing a desulfonylation reaction of the distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream inside the reactor vessel, the reactor vessel configured such that when the desulfonylation reaction of the distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream takes place inside the reactor vessel: a solid selectivity promoter remains inside the reactor vessel while the desulfonylation reaction of the distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream takes place inside the reactor vessel; andthe solid selectivity promoter is regenerated while the desulfonylation reaction of the distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream takes place inside the reactor vessel.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a separating vessel;wherein the desulfonylation reaction of the distilled oxidized hydrocarbon stream results in an upgraded hydrocarbon product; andwherein the separating vessel separates the upgraded hydrocarbon product into a light phase.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the solid selectivity promoter comprises at least one of activated carbon, graphite, graphene, coal, and an asphaltene.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein an interior of the reactor vessel is pressurized with a hydrogen gas.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the interior of the reactor vessel is pressurized with the hydrogen gas to a pressure of at least 200 psig.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein a caustic is used in the desulfonylation reaction of the distilled hydrocarbon stream and wherein the caustic comprises an inorganic basic compound.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the inorganic basic compound includes at least one of: an inorganic oxide from a group IA or IIA element, an inorganic hydroxide from a group IA or IIA element, a mixture of oxides and hydroxides from group IA or IIA elements, a molten hydroxide from a group IA or IIA element, and a mixture of hydroxides from group IA or IIA elements.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, wherein the caustic comprises the inorganic basic compound at about 50% weight in water.
  • 9. The system of claim 6, wherein the caustic comprises at least one of: Li2O, Na2O, K2O, Rb2O, Cs2O, Fr2O, B2O, MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO, LiOH, NaOH, KOH, RbOH, CsOH, FrOH, Be(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, Ca(OH)2, Sr(OH)2, Ba(OH)2, and green liquor.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the intermediate stream comprises the oxidized heteroatom containing compounds and wherein the oxidized heteroatom containing compounds are formed by oxidizing the hydrocarbon stream with an oxidant in the oxidizer vessel.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the oxidized heteroatom containing compounds are also formed by an acid treatment.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein a catalyst is used in the presence of the oxidant.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the catalyst is bound to a support surface.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the support surface comprises one of an organic polymer and an inorganic oxide.
  • 15. The system of claim 4, wherein the hydrogen gas regenerates the solid selectivity promoter.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority and benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/451,981 filed on Mar. 7, 2017, entitled “Catalytic Caustic Desulfonylation,” which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 62/305,039 filed on Mar. 8, 2016, entitled “Catalytic Caustic Desulfonylation,” the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (186)
Number Name Date Kind
1796621 Ramage Mar 1931 A
2110283 Archibald Mar 1938 A
2764525 Porter et al. Sep 1956 A
2771402 Birch et al. Nov 1956 A
2789134 Nelson et al. Apr 1957 A
2794770 Alderson et al. Jun 1957 A
2910434 Hess et al. Oct 1959 A
2987740 Earnhardt Jun 1961 A
3136714 Gibson et al. Jun 1964 A
3164545 Mattox Jan 1965 A
3505210 Wallace et al. Apr 1970 A
3558747 Meltsner Jan 1971 A
3565793 Herbstman et al. Feb 1971 A
3668117 Patel et al. Jun 1972 A
3819509 Wolk et al. Jun 1974 A
3847797 Pasternak et al. Nov 1974 A
3873587 Rosenthal et al. Mar 1975 A
3954914 Yoo et al. Mar 1976 A
3948759 King et al. Apr 1976 A
3957620 Fukui et al. May 1976 A
3960706 McCollum et al. Jun 1976 A
3960708 McCollum et al. Jun 1976 A
3964995 Wolk et al. Jun 1976 A
4003823 Baird, Jr. et al. Jan 1977 A
4088569 Douglas May 1978 A
4119528 Baird, Jr. et al. Oct 1978 A
4127470 Baird, Jr. et al. Nov 1978 A
4192736 Kluksdahl Mar 1980 A
4224140 Fujimori et al. Sep 1980 A
4374949 Massey et al. Feb 1983 A
4437980 Heredy et al. Mar 1984 A
4444655 Shiroto et al. Apr 1984 A
4591426 Krasuk et al. May 1986 A
4645589 Krambeck et al. Feb 1987 A
4665261 Mazurek May 1987 A
4923682 Roberts et al. May 1990 A
5064523 Kretschmar et al. Nov 1991 A
5089149 Ridland et al. Feb 1992 A
5166118 Kretschmar et al. Nov 1992 A
5282960 Pillon et al. Feb 1994 A
5288681 Gatsis Feb 1994 A
5616751 Nakai et al. Apr 1997 A
5637739 Jacobsen et al. Jun 1997 A
6087662 Wilt et al. Jul 2000 A
6160193 Gore Dec 2000 A
6245223 Gorbaty et al. Jun 2001 B1
6342191 Kepner et al. Jan 2002 B1
6368495 Kocal et al. Apr 2002 B1
6403526 Lussier et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406616 Rappas et al. Jun 2002 B1
6471852 Mark et al. Oct 2002 B1
6544409 De Souza Apr 2003 B2
6547957 Sudhakar et al. Apr 2003 B1
6579472 Chung et al. Jun 2003 B2
6638419 Da Silva et al. Oct 2003 B1
6673236 Stanciulescu et al. Jan 2004 B2
6846406 Canos et al. Jan 2005 B2
7144499 Han et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153414 De Souza Dec 2006 B2
7179368 Rabion et al. Feb 2007 B2
7314545 Karas et al. Jan 2008 B2
7371318 Corma Canos et al. May 2008 B2
7374666 Wachs May 2008 B2
7591944 Carnell et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598426 Fang et al. Oct 2009 B2
7648625 Bhan et al. Jan 2010 B2
7678264 Bhan Mar 2010 B2
7749374 Bhan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7790021 Kocal et al. Sep 2010 B2
7875185 Zhang Jan 2011 B2
7918992 Bhan Apr 2011 B2
8021540 Toida Sep 2011 B2
8088706 Domokos et al. Jan 2012 B2
8187991 Osaheni et al. May 2012 B2
8197671 Rankin et al. Jun 2012 B2
8241490 Litz et al. Aug 2012 B2
8283498 Litz et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298404 Litz et al. Oct 2012 B2
8372777 Bhan et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394261 Litz et al. Mar 2013 B2
8409541 Reynolds et al. Apr 2013 B2
8444061 Van Den Berg et al. May 2013 B2
8450538 Bhan et al. May 2013 B2
8481450 Bhan Jul 2013 B2
8487155 Boateng et al. Jul 2013 B2
8492599 Bhan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8530370 Donaho et al. Sep 2013 B2
8562817 Milam et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562818 Milam et al. Oct 2013 B2
8597608 Reynolds et al. Dec 2013 B2
8608946 Bhan et al. Dec 2013 B2
8673132 Leta et al. Mar 2014 B2
8696890 Soto et al. Apr 2014 B2
8703015 Chen et al. Apr 2014 B2
8764973 Litz et al. Jul 2014 B2
8877013 Litz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8877043 Litz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8894843 Rankin et al. Nov 2014 B2
8894845 Vann et al. Nov 2014 B2
8961779 Litz et al. Feb 2015 B2
9061273 Litz et al. Jun 2015 B2
9206359 Litz et al. Dec 2015 B2
9512151 Litz et al. Dec 2016 B2
9828557 Rankin et al. Nov 2017 B2
20020177522 Alexander, IV et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020189975 De Souza Dec 2002 A1
20030000867 Reynolds Jan 2003 A1
20030024432 Chung et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030149317 Rendina Aug 2003 A1
20040108252 De Souza Jun 2004 A1
20040178121 Leyshon et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178122 Karas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040219116 Reynders et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040222134 de Souza Nov 2004 A1
20040238410 Inoue et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050014850 Hu Jan 2005 A1
20050023188 Connor Feb 2005 A1
20060011510 Toshima et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060144793 Dadachov Jul 2006 A1
20060154814 Zanibelli et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060180501 Da Silva et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060231456 Bhan Oct 2006 A1
20060231457 Bhan Oct 2006 A1
20060234876 Bhan Oct 2006 A1
20070000810 Bhan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070051667 Martinie et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070256980 Krogue et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070295646 Bhan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080083650 Bhan et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080087575 Bhan et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080121565 Yoo et al. May 2008 A1
20080135449 Bhan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080308463 Keckler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090065399 Kocal et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090188836 Bhan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100055005 Bhan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100098602 Bhan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20110000823 Hamad et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110011771 Litz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110031164 Litz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110108464 Rankin et al. May 2011 A1
20110119988 Litz et al. May 2011 A1
20110147274 Soto et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110178346 Milam et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110192762 Wellington et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110210043 Wellington et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110294657 Soled et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120028341 Heerze Feb 2012 A1
20120055843 Bourane et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120055844 Bourane et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120055845 Bourane et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120055849 Bourane et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120067777 Litz et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120067783 Kaplan et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120074040 Koseoglu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120149961 Krupa et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120152804 Koseoglu et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120285864 Rankin et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120285866 Litz et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130015104 Al-Hajji et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026062 Al-Shahrani et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026071 Koseoglu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026075 Koseoglu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130028822 Bourane et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030236 Koseoglu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130048543 Litz et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130075305 Al-Shafei et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130130892 Litz et al. May 2013 A1
20130171039 Graham et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185044 Chen et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130313161 Dindi Nov 2013 A1
20130315793 Koseoglu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130334103 Bourane et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140024569 Bera et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140030171 Mohamadalizadeh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140131256 Litz et al. May 2014 A1
20140151305 Schrage et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140216984 Litz et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140291199 Litz et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140339136 Litz et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150184086 Rankin et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150337208 Litz et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150337220 Litz et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160281003 Litz et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170260462 Rankin et al. Sep 2017 A1
20190055483 Bafna Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
101161788 Apr 2008 CN
827345 Apr 1938 FR
1299736 Jul 1962 FR
1472280 Mar 1967 FR
100733571 Jun 2007 KR
171286 Oct 1993 MX
2087520 Aug 1997 RU
2146693 Mar 2000 RU
2177494 Dec 2001 RU
0181715 Nov 2001 WO
2006093799 Sep 2006 WO
2008153633 Dec 2008 WO
2009120238 Oct 2009 WO
2012039910 Mar 2012 WO
2012051009 Apr 2012 WO
2013188144 Dec 2013 WO
2014018082 Jan 2014 WO
2014095813 Jun 2014 WO
2016154529 Sep 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (136)
Entry
Aida, Tetsuo, et al. Development of an Efficient Coal-Desulfurization process: “Oxy-Alkalinolysis”. Technical Report Resource Conference: American Chemical Society symposium on coal liquefaction, pp. 328-334. Kansas City, MO USA. Published Sep. 1, 1982 Ames Lab., IA (USA); Advanced Fuel Research, Inc., East Hartford, CT (USA).
Aida, Tetsuo, et al. Reaction of Dibenzothiophene Sulfone with Alkoxides. Tetrahedron Letters (1983), vol. 24, No. 34, pp. 3543-3546. USA.
Akasaka, Takeshi,e t al. Singlet Oxygen Oxidation of Organophosphorus Compounds: Cooxidation of Olefin with Phosphadioxirane. Quimica Nova, 1993, 16, pp. 325-327. No published date or location.
Ali, Mohammed Hashmat, et al. Ceric Ammonium Nitrate Catalyzed Oxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides. Synthesis, 2007, No. 22, pp. 3507-3511. Published on Web Oct. 16, 2007.
Drago, Carmelo, et al. Vanadium-Catalyzed Sulfur Oxidation/Kinetic Resolution in the Synthesis of Enantiomerically Pure Alkyl Aryl Sulfoxides. Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2005, 44, pp. 7221-7223. Published on Web Oct. 17, 2005.
Egami, Hiromichi, et al. Fe(salan)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Oxidation of Sulfides with Hydrogen Peroxide in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, vol. 129, No. 29, pp. 8940-8941. Published on Web Jun. 29, 2007.
El Nady, M. M. et al. (2013). Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 1, 1-7.
Energy Intelligence Group. (2007). “The Crude Oils and their Key Characteristics,” 7 pgs. (Available at http://www.energyintel.com/pages/eig_article.aspx?DocId=200017).
http:/ /evans.rc.fas.harvard.edu/pdf/evans _pKa table. Pdf.
Imada, Yasushi, et al. Flavin Catalyzed Oxidations of Sulfides and Amines with Molecular Oxygen. J. Am Chem. Soc., 2003, vol. 125, No. 10, pp. 2868-2869. Published on Web Feb. 12, 2003.
Jain, Suman L., et al. Rehenium-Catalyzed Highly Efficient Oxidations of Tertiary Nitrogen Compounds to N-Oxides Using Sodium Percarbonate as Oxygen Source. Synlett, 2006, No. 16, pp. 2661-2663. Published on Web Sep. 22, 2006.
Jana, Nirmal K., et al. Phase-Vanishing Methodology for Efficient Bromination, Alkylation, Epoxidation, and Oxidation Reactions of Organic Substrates. Organic Letters, 2003, vol. 5, No. 21, pp. 3787-3790. Published on Web Sep. 16, 2003.
Jiang, Benpeng et al., (“Hydrothermal synthesis of rutile TiO2 nanoparticles using hydroxyl and carboxyl group-containing organics as modifiers.” Materials Chemistry and Physics, pp. 231-235), 2006. (6928UAE Exam Report).
Karimi, Babak, et al. Selective Oxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides Using 30% Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyzed with a Recoverable Silica-Based Tungstate Interphase Catalyst. Organic Letters, 2005, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 625-628. Published on Web Jan. 25, 2005.
Khodaei, Mohammad Mehdi, et al. H2O2/Tf2O System: An Efficient Oxidizing Reagent for Selective Oxidation of Sulfanes. Synthesis, 2008; No. 11, pp. 1682-1684. Published on Web Apr. 11, 2008.
Kim, Sung Soo, et al. A Mild and Highly Efficient Oxidation of Sulfide to Sulfoxides with Periodic Acid Catalyzed by FeCl3. Synthesis, 2002, No. 17, pp. 2484-2486. Published USA Feb. 12, 2002.
Matteucci, Mizio, et al. Mild and Highly Chemoselective Oxidation of Thioethers Mediated by Sc(OTf)3. Organic Letters, 2003, vol. 5, No. 3, 235-237. Published on Web Jan. 11, 2003.
Mba, Myriam, et al. C3-Symmetric Ti(IV) Triphenolate Amino Complexes as Sulfoxidation Catalysts with Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide. Organic Letters, 2007, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 21-24. Published on Web Dec. 9, 2006.
McKillop, Alexander, et al. Further Functional-Group Oxidations Using Sodium Perborate. Tetrahedron, vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 3299 to 3306, 1989. Published in Great Britain.
Milner, O.I., et al. Determination of Trace Materials in Crudes and Other Petroleum Oils. Analytical Chemistry, vol. 24, No. 11. Published Nov. 1952, USA.
Oviedo, Alberto, et al. Deoxydesulfurization of sulfones derived from dibenzothiophene using nickel compounds. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, (2008) 293, pp. 65-71. USA.
Pyatnaskii, I.V., et al., “Photometric investigation of Fe(II) and Ti(IV) complexes and mannitol and glycerol in solutios,” CA, Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, US, (1963), (Russian Edition), Database accession No. 59:33671, URL: STN, XP002649502; Ukrainskii Khimicheskii Zhurnal, (1963), pp. 440-449 (English Translation of Abstract Only), 11 pages.
Qian, Weixing, et al. Efficient and Highly Selective Oxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides in the Presence of an Ionic Liquid Containing Hypervalent Iodine. Synlett, 2006, No. 5, pp. 709-712. Published on Web Mar. 9, 2006.
Ripin, D.H., et al., “pKa's of Inorganic and Oxo-Acids”, [http://evans.harvard.edu/pdf/evans_pka_table.pdf]; published Apr. 11, 2005, accessed Apr. 29, 2013. 6 pages.
Shaabani, Ahmad, et al. Green oxidations. The use of potassium permanganate supported on manganese dioxide. Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, pp. 11415-11420. Published on Web Oct. 12, 2004.
Sun, Jiangtao, et al. Efficient Asymmetric Oxidation of Sulfides and Kinetic Resolution of Sulfoxides Catalyzed by a Vanadium-Salan System. J. Org. Chem., 2004, vol. 69, No. 24, pp. 8500-8503. Published on Web Oct. 28, 2004.
Varma, Rajender S., et al. The Urea-Hydrogen Peroxide Complex: Solid-State Oxidatives Protocols for Hydroxylated Aldehydes and Ketones (Dakin Reaction), Nitrites, Sulfides, and Nitrogen Heterocycles. Organic Letters, 1999, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 189-191. Published on Web May 29, 1999.
Varma, Rajender S., et al. The Urea-Hydrogen Peroxide Complex: Solid-State Oxidative Protocols for Hydroxylated Aldehydes and Ketones (Dakin Reaction), Nitrites, Sulfides, and Nitrogen Heterocycles. Organic Letters, 1999, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 189-191. Published on Web May 29, 1999.
Wozniak, Lucyna A., et al. Oxidation in Organophosphorus Chemistry: Potassium Peroxymonosulphate. Tetrahedron, 1999, 40, pp. 2637-2640. Accepted Feb. 3, 1999. No published date.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/43843, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 27, 2013, 7 pages.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201380015161.1, Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2015.
European Patent Application No. 13 803 981.3, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2016, 10 pages.
European Patent Application No. 13 803 981.3, Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2016, 7 pages.
GCC Patent Application No. GC2013-24619, Examination Report dated Nov. 26, 2016, 4 pages.
Indian Patent Application No. 9011/CHENP/2014, Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2018.
Iraqi Patent Application No. 2013/188, Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011.
Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/014432 , Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2017.
Russian Patent Application No. 2014152661/04, Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2017.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,868,851, Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2019.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/82095, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated Mar. 20, 2009, 12 pages.
Australian Patent Application No. 2008353354, Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2013, 4 pages.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,719,058, Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2014, 3 pages.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,719,058, Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2015, 4 pages.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,719,058, Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2016, 3 pages.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,719,058, Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2016, 3 pages.
Chilean Patent Application No. 1040-2010, Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2014.
Chilean Patent Application No. 1040-2010, Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2014.
Chinese Patent Application No. 200880128410.7, Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2013.
Chinese Patent Application No. 200880128410.7, Office Action dated May 23, 2013.
Chinese Patent Application No. 200880128410.7, Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2011.
Egyptian Patent Application No. 2010/09/1614, Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2012.
Egyptian Patent Application No. 2010/09/1614, Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2011.
Egyptian Patent Application No. 2010/1614 D2, Office Action forwarded dated Feb. 2, 2014.
Egyptian Patent Application No. 2010/1614 D1, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2013.
European Patent Application No. 08873622.8, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2013, 8 pages.
GCC Patent Application No. GCC/P.2009/13131, Examination Report dated Apr. 17, 2014, 6 pages.
GCC Patent Application No. GCC/P.2009/13131, Examination Report dated Feb. 3, 2016, 9 pages.
GCC Patent Application No. GCC/P/2009/27433, Examination Report dated May 13, 2018, 5 pages.
Indian Patent Application No. 1992/MUMNP/2010, Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2015.
Indonesian Patent Application No. W00201003533, Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2014, 2 pages.
Iraqi Patent Application No. 285/2010, Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2013.
Iraqi Patent Application No. 285/2010, Office Action dated May 26, 2013.
Iraqi Patent Application No. 285/2010, Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2014.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-501781, Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2013, 4 pages.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/50159, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 12, 2012, 11 pages.
Examiner's Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,810,690 dated Apr. 8, 2018.
Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,810,690 dated Jul. 24, 2017.
Office Action in Indian Patent Application No. 1766/CHENP/2013 dated Jan. 25, 2018.
Office Action in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR 11 2013 006559-1 dated Jan. 28, 2019. 5 pages.
Office Action (dated Aug. 15, 2013) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,584, filed Jul. 27, 2012.
Office Action (dated Dec. 17, 2013) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,584, filed Jul. 27, 2012.
Office Action (dated Feb. 27, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,584, filed Jul. 12, 2012.
Notice of Allowance (dated Apr. 29, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,584, filed Jul. 12, 2012.
Office Action (dated Jun. 15, 2016) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/246,508, filed Apr. 7, 2014.
Office Action (dated Feb. 24, 2017) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/246,508, filed Apr. 7, 2014.
Office Action (dated Jan. 21, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/287,916, filed May 27, 2014.
Office Action (dated Jun. 19, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/287,916, filed May 27, 2014.
Notice of Allowance (dated Aug. 4, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/287,916, filed May 27, 2014.
Office Action (dated Apr. 22, 2016) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/286,342, filed May 23, 2014.
Office Action (dated Apr. 20, 2016) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,230, filed Dec. 17, 2014.
Restriction Requirement (dated Sep. 5, 2017) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/080,784, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Ex Parte Quayle (dated Sep. 7, 2018) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/080,784, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Notice of Allowance (dated Nov. 20, 2018) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/080,784, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
Notice of Allowance (dated Apr. 4, 2019) for U.S. Appl. No. 16/285,532, filed Mar. 26, 2019.
Restriction Requirement (dated Feb. 21, 2019) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/451,981, filed Mar. 7, 2017.
Notice of Allowance (dated Jun. 12, 2019) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/451,981, filed Mar. 7, 2017.
Notice of Allowance in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,810,690 dated Mar. 15, 2019.
Korean Office Action Translation for KR Appln. No. 2009-7024832.
Brazilian Patent Application No. 0809881-6, Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2019, 4 pages.
Bahrain Patent Application No. 107/2009, Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2018. 9 pages.
SCC Patent Application No. GC 2011-19492, Examination Report dated Dec. 29, 2015, 4 pages.
SCC Patent Application No. GC 2011-19492, Examination Report dated Aug. 24, 2017, 4 pages.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/54840, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 12, 2012, 8 pages.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/70243, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 25, 2013, 40 pages.
European Office Action for Application No. 11 833 137.0-1361, dated Aug. 13, 2015.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US15/32417, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 5, 2015.
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2015105930/04, dated Oct. 17, 2016.
Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,808,640 dated Oct. 17, 2017, 3 pages.
Office Action in Indian Patent Application No. 1765/CHENP/2013 dated Feb. 9, 2018.
Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/000923 , Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2017. 4 pages.
Indian Patent Application No. 8430/CHENP/2014, Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2018, 6 pages.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,879,626, Examination Search Report dated Dec. 31, 2018.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,879,626, Examination Search Report dated Jan. 4, 2019.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US15/31461, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 1, 2015.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US15/064587, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 16, 2016.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US16/024201, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 20, 2016.
Notice of Allowance for Canadian Appln No. 2,705,456, dated Sep. 17, 2015.
Notice of Allowance (dated Feb. 13, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/977,639, filed Dec. 23, 2010.
Office Action (dated Aug. 19, 2013) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,240, filed Jun. 11, 2012.
Office Action (dated Jan. 3, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,240, filed Jun. 11, 2012.
Office Action (dated Mar. 20, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,240, filed Jun. 11, 2012.
Notice of Allowance (dated Jul. 17, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,240, filed Jun. 11, 2012.
Office Action (dated Apr. 11, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,898, filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Office Action (dated Oct. 18, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,898, filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Notice of Allowance (dated Nov. 9, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,898, filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Office Action (dated Nov. 10, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,054, filed Jan. 4, 2013.
Notice of Allowance (dated Feb. 27, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,054, filed Jan. 4, 2013.
Notice of Allowance (dated Jul. 9, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,0489, filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Office Action (dated Jun. 6, 2013) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,371, filed Oct. 25, 2012.
Office Action (dated Nov. 12, 2013) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,371, filed Oct. 25, 2012.
Notice of Allowance (dated Jun. 24, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,371, filed Oct. 25, 2012.
Office Action (dated Jun. 25, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/246,597, filed Apr. 7, 2014.
Notice of Allowance (dated Aug. 14, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/246,597, filed Apr. 7, 2014.
Office Action (dated Jun. 19, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/159,833, filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Notice of Allowance (dated Oct. 27, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/159,833, filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Office Action (dated Feb. 22, 2017) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,169, filed Feb. 23, 2015.
Notice of Allowance (dated Jul. 21, 2017) or U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,169, filed Feb. 23, 2015.
Office Action (dated Mar. 20, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Office Action (dated Oct. 15, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Office Action (dated Sep. 11, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Advisory Action (dated Dec. 10, 2014) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Office Action (dated May 11, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Office Action (dated Nov. 20, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Final Office Action (dated May 6, 2016) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Notice of Allowance (dated Aug. 9, 2016) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,474, filed Apr. 23, 2010.
Notice of Allowance (dated Feb. 13, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 12/904,446, filed Oct. 14, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200040264 A1 Feb 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62305039 Mar 2016 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15451981 Mar 2017 US
Child 16599622 US