Catalytic material for treating pollutant-containing gases

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6586359
  • Patent Number
    6,586,359
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 17, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 1, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A catalytic composition and method of making the same in which a catalytic material has an average pore size distribution sufficiently large to substantially prevent capillary condensation.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a method of treating pollutant-containing gases in which such gases are contacted with a catalyst composition containing at least one catalytic material which has an average pore size and surface area sufficient to prevent or at least substantially reduce capillary condensation.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a method of forming catalytic materials in such a manner that the catalytic material does not substantially undergo capillary condensation. Accordingly, the adverse effect that water vapor has on catalytic activity of the catalytic material is minimized.




Catalytic materials, especially for removing pollutants from a pollutant-containing gas are generally comprised of metals as well as other constituents which actively induce a chemical reaction. The effectiveness of a catalytic material depends in part on the availability of catalytically active sites. The more catalytically active sites available from a given catalyst, the more efficiently the catalytic material can promote the desired reaction.




Catalytic materials are used to induce the reaction of pollutants contained within a pollutant-containing gas into harmless by-products. There are numerous pollutants which are found in the atmosphere and/or contained within gas discharged from industrial facilities or automotive vehicles. Such pollutants include hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, ozone, sulfur compounds and NO


x


compounds.




If a potentially catalytically active site is blocked then its availability to catalyze the chemical reaction of a pollutant is eliminated or at least substantially reduced. Compounds which block catalytically active sites do so by binding to the catalytic material so that at least a portion of the time the catalytically active site is unavailable for catalyzing a reaction. The stronger the bond between the blocking compound and the catalytically active site, the less efficient the catalytic material is in inducing a chemical reaction to convert pollutants to harmless by-products.




It is well known that water molecules have an affinity for catalytic materials, especially metals. Accordingly, water serves as a blocking compound which reversibly binds to catalytically active sites. The bond between water molecules and catalytically active sites is typically of moderate strength so that the water molecules spend only a portion of the time bound to the catalytically active site. When the water molecule is so bound, the particular catalytically active site is incapable of inducing a chemical reaction to convert pollutants to harmless by-products.




Catalytic materials including those incorporating precious metals, base metals and the like are employed in catalytic compositions for the treatment of pollutant-containing gases such as exhaust gas from automotive vehicles. The exhaust gases typically contain moisture or water vapor and the amount of water vapor will vary depending on climatic conditions. As previously indicated, the presence of water molecules can impede the effectiveness of a catalytic material because water acts as a blocking compound.




During normal operation of an automotive vehicle, the temperature of the exhaust gas will be several hundred degrees. Under these high temperature conditions, water molecules are energized due to the input of thermal energy. Highly energized molecules tend to remain in motion. This high energy level limits the time the water molecules remain bound to catalytically active sites. Accordingly, the presence of water vapor under high temperature operating conditions does not adversely affect the efficiency of catalytic materials to the same extent as under lower temperature operating conditions when water molecules are less energized. Under less energized conditions, water molecules tend to bind to catalytically active sites for a greater length of time than under high energy conditions (e.g. higher temperatures).




Catalytic materials are generally manufactured with a preference for high surface areas so as to enable a greater number of catalytic sites to catalyze the reaction of pollutants contained within a pollutant-containing gas. High surface area catalytic materials can be produced by employing a pore structure comprised of micropores having an average pore size as low as possible, typically less than 5 nanometers (nm). Smaller pores therefore, are characteristic of high surface area catalytic materials.




It has been observed that catalytic materials having an average pore size of less than about 5 nm, undesirably retain moisture especially under high humidity and low temperature (i.e. low energy) conditions. When water vapor is in contact with such materials, molecules of water enter the relatively small pores and remain within the pores. This phenomenon is known as capillary condensation.




“Capillary condensation” as used herein means that water molecules enter and remain within the micropore structure of the catalytic material. Because the micropores have very small pore sizes (typically less than 5 nm), the water molecules become “stuck” in the pores and can be removed only with some difficulty. The retention of water molecules in micropores (capillary condensation) reduces the effectiveness of catalytic materials because the water molecules block the catalytically active sites as previously described. In particular, the number of catalytically active sites available to catalyze the reaction of a pollutant is reduced and therefore the efficiency of the catalytic material is impaired.




It would therefore be a significant advance in the art of removing pollutants from a pollutant-containing gas to provide catalytic materials in which capillary condensation is prevented or at least substantially minimized. It would be another advance in the art to produce catalytic materials which can be used in automotive vehicles to remove pollutants from a pollutant-containing gas under high humidity and/or low temperature operating conditions.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is generally directed to a method of treating a pollutant-containing gas with a catalytic material in which the presence of water vapor, even under high relative humidity conditions and/or low temperature operating conditions, does not substantially adversely affect catalyst performance. Catalytic materials which can perform in this manner are also encompassed by the present invention.




In particular, the present invention is directed to a catalytic composition and method of treating a pollutant-containing gas comprising contacting the pollutant-containing gas with a catalyst composition containing at least one catalytic material which has an average pore size of at least 5 nm and a surface area sufficiently large to enable the catalytic material to react with the pollutant in the pollutant-containing gas. As a result capillary condensation is at least substantially prevented whereby there is sufficient accessability of the catalytically active sites to induce a reaction of the pollutant to produce harmless by-products.




In a preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method of treating a pollutant-containing gas even under high humidity and/or reduced temperature conditions in which the catalytic material has an average pore size of at least 10 nm. Catalytic materials employed in the present method are also the subject of the present invention.




The catalytic material, in addition to having an average pore size of at least 5 nm distribution as described above, also has a relatively large surface area, typically at least 100 m


2


/g. Preferably, the catalytic material has a relatively high total pore volume, typically at least 0.9 cm


3


/g.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The following drawings are illustrative of embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention as encompassed by the claims forming part of the application.





FIG. 1

is a graph showing the amount of water adsorbed by two catalysts as a function of relative humidity;





FIG. 2

is a graph showing capillary condensation as a function of average pore size for a given catalytic material; and





FIG. 3

is a graph showing the efficiency of ozone conversion as a function of relative humidity.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The catalytic materials of the present invention have an average pore size and a surface area sufficient to prevent or at least substantially reduce capillary condensation. In a preferred form of the invention, the total pore volume of the catalytic material is selected to further minimize capillary condensation. As previously explained, capillary condensation occurs when water molecules enter micropores of a catalytic material and become retained therein because the small size of the pores makes it difficult for the water to be removed in the absence of raising the energy level of the water molecules such as occurs at elevated temperatures (e.g. temperatures of at least about 100° C.). As used herein the term “average pore size” shall mean the average pore diameter of the pores of the catalytic material.




It has been observed that condensation of water occurs in the pores of catalytic materials having an average pore size of less than 5 nm, especially at a relative humidity of at least about 50%. The relative humidity is based on the partial pressure of the water in the air and the saturation vapor pressure at the catalyst operating temperature. The filing of pores with water molecules via capillary condensation is governed by the formula








RT





ln






(

P

P
0


)


=



-
V






γ





cos






(
θ
)


D


,










where R is the gas constant (8.31 Joules/mole/K), T is the operating temperature of catalyst system, ln is the natural logarithm, P is the partial pressure of water vapor, P


0


is the saturation vapor pressure of water at the operating temperature T, V is the molar volume of water (18 cm


3


/mole), γ is the surface tension of water (72.6 dynes/cm), θ is the contact angle and D is the capillary diameter (cm). The contact angle is the angle formed between the liquid surface and a solid surface. For hydrophilic surfaces, the contact angle is generally between about 0 and 90 degrees. For hydrophobic surfaces, the contact angle is generally between about 90 and 180 degrees. The contact angle for metal oxide surfaces (e.g. alumina) is typically less than 90°.




Applicants have discovered that when a catalytic material is provided with an average pore size of at least 5 nm and a surface area of at least 100 m


2


/g capillary condensation is prevented or at least substantially reduced.




Referring to

FIG. 1

there is shown a graph depicting the relationship between water adsorption and relative humidity for two different manganese oxide based catalytic materials. The first of the catalytic materials is Carulite® 200 produced by Carus Chemicals, Inc. and the second is HSA (a high surface area) MnO


2


produced by Chemetals, Inc. As shown in

FIG. 1

, water adsorption for each of the catalytic materials is relatively low until the relative humidity reaches about 50%. Water adsorption below a relative humidity of about 50% is due principally to multi-layer adsorption. Multilayer adsorption is the formation of multiple thin layers of moisture which does not substantially prevent access of the pollutant-containing gas to the catalytic material contained within the pores. At a relative humidity of about 50%, the amount of water adsorbed increases significantly due to capillary condensation.




In accordance with the present invention, the average pore size and the relative humidity of the atmosphere impact on whether or not capillary condensation occurs.




As shown in FIG.


2


and in accordance with the present invention, as the average pore size increases, the relative humidity necessary to induce capillary condensation significantly increases. Capillary condensation is initiated at low pore sizes (an average pore size of less than 5 nm) at low relative humidity conditions (i.e. ≦50%). Thus increasing the average pore size to at least 5 nm prevents or substantially reduces capillary condensation to relative humidities of up to about 50% when the catalytic material has a surface area of at least 100 m


2


/g. Increasing the average pore size to a preferred range of at least 10 nm and more preferably from about 15 to 50 nm substantially eliminates capillary condensation to relative humidities up to about 75%.




The effect of relative humidity on the ability of a catalyst to convert ozone to harmless byproducts is shown in FIG.


3


. These results were obtained by passing 1.53 L/min of air containing 5 ppm of ozone through 50 mg of high surface area α-MnO


2


at 25-27° C. As shown in

FIG. 3

, about 65-68% conversion of ozone was achieved at a relative humidity of from about 50 to 60%. However, as the relative humidity increased, especially above 60% (e.g. 90%) there was a noticeable decline in the ozone conversion rate to 19%. The significant decline in conversion rate is due at least in large part to the presence of water in vicinity of the catalytically active sites due to capillary condensation.




The catalytic materials which can be employed in the present invention can vary widely but generally include platinum group metals, base metals, alkaline earth metals, rare earth metals and transition metals.




The platinum group metals include platinum, palladium, iridium, and rhodium. The base metals include manganese, copper, nickel, cobalt, silver and gold. The alkaline earth metals include beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, and radium. The rare earth metals include cesium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium. Early transition metals include scandium, yttrium, lanthanum, tympanum, zirconium, and hafnium.




Examples of such catalytic materials are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,992, U.S. Pat. No. 5,128,306, U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,483, U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,981, U.S. Pat. No. 5,254,519, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,212,142, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.




The most preferred catalytic materials for use in the present invention are those which contain manganese and particularly those which contain manganese dioxide as explained in detail hereinafter. Such catalytic materials are especially suitable for treating ozone.




Ozone treating catalyst compositions comprise manganese compounds including manganese dioxide, non stoichiometric manganese dioxide (e.g., XMnO


(1.5-2.0)


), and/or XMn


2


O


3


wherein X is a metal ion, preferably an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal (e.g. sodium, potassium and barium). Variable amounts of water (H


2


O, OH





) can be incorporated in the structure as well. Preferred manganese dioxides, which are nominally referred to as MnO


2


have a chemical formula wherein the molar ratio of manganese to oxide is about from 1.5 to 2.0. Up to 100 percent by weight of manganese dioxide MnO


2


can be used in catalyst compositions to treat ozone. Alternative compositions which are available comprise manganese dioxide and compounds such as copper oxide alone or copper oxide and alumina. In accordance with the present invention, the most dramatic improvement in catalytic efficiency with higher pore size distribution is seen with catalyst containing manganese dioxide alone.




Useful and preferred manganese dioxides are alpha-manganese dioxides nominally having a molar ratio of manganese to oxygen of from 1 to 2. Useful alpha manganese dioxides are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,340,562 to O'Young, et al.; also in O'Young, Hydrothermal Synthesis of Manganese Oxides with Tunnel Structures presented at the Symposium on Advances in Zeolites and Pillared Clay Structures presented before the Division of Petroleum Chemistry, Inc. American Chemical Society New York City Meeting, Aug. 25-30, 1991 beginning at page 342; and in McKenzie, the Synthesis of Bimessite, Cryptomelane, and Some Other Oxides and Hydroxides of Manganese, Mineralogical Magazine, December 1971, Vol. 38, pp. 493-502. For the purposes of the present invention, the preferred alpha-manganese dioxide is selected from hollandite (BaMn


8


O


16


.xH


2


O), cryptomelane (KMn


8


O


16


.xH


2


O), manjiroite (NaMn


8


O


16


.xH


2


O) or coronadite (PbMn


8


O


16


.xH


2


O).




The manganese dioxides useful in the present invention preferably have a surface area as high as possible while maintaining a pore size distribution of at least 10 nm. A preferred surface area is at least 100 m


2


/g.




The composition preferably comprises a binder as of the type described below with preferred binders being polymeric binders. The composition can further comprise precious metal components with precious metal components being the oxides of precious metal, including the oxides of platinum group metals and oxides of palladium or platinum also referred to as palladium black or platinum black. The amount of palladium or platinum black can range from 0 to 25%, with useful amounts being in ranges of from about 1 to 25 and 5 to 15% by weight based on the weight of the manganese component and the precious metal component.




It has been found that the use of compositions comprising the cryptomelane form of alpha manganese oxide, which also contain a polymeric binder can result in greater than 50%, preferably greater than 60% and typically from 75-85% conversion of ozone in a concentration range of up to 400 parts per billion (ppb).




The preferred cryptomelane manganese dioxide has a crystallite size ranging from 2 to 10 nm and preferably less than 5 nm. It can be calcined at a temperature range of from 250° C. to 550° C. and preferably below 500° C. and greater than 300° C. for at least 1.5 hours and preferably at least 2 hours up to about 6 hours.




The preferred cryptomelane can be made in accordance with methods described and incorporated into U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/589,182 filed Jan. 19, 1996, incorporated herein by reference. The cryptomelane can be made by reacting a manganese salt including salts selected from the group consisting MnCl


2


, Mn(NO


3


)


2


, MnSO


4


and Mn(CH


3


COO)


2


with a permanganate compound. Cryptomelane is made using potassium permanganate; hollandite is made using barium permanganate; coronadite is made using lead permanganate; and manjiroite is made using sodium permanganate. It is recognized that the alpha-manganese dioxide useful in the present invention can contain one or more of hollandite, cryptomelane, manjiroite or coronadite compounds. Even when making cryptomelane minor amounts of other metal ions such as sodium may be present. Useful methods to form the alpha-manganese dioxide are described in the above references which are incorporated herein by reference.




The preferred alpha-manganese dioxide for use in accordance with the present invention is cryptomelane. The preferred cryptomelane is “clean” or substantially free of inorganic anions, particularly on the surface. Such anions could include chlorides, sulfates and nitrates which are introduced during the method to form cryptomelane. An alternate method to make the clean cryptomelane is to react a manganese carboxylate, preferably manganese acetate, with potassium permanganate.




It is believed that the carboxylates are burned off during the calcination process. However, inorganic anions remain on the surface even during calcination. The inorganic anions such as sulfates can be washed away with the aqueous solution or a slightly acidic aqueous solution. Preferably the alpha manganese dioxide is a “clean” alpha manganese dioxide. The cryptomelane can be washed at from about 60° C. to 100° C. for about one-half hour to remove a significant amount of sulfate anions. The nitrate anions may be removed in a similar manner. The “clean” alpha manganese dioxide is characterized as having an IR spectrum as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/589,182 filed Jan. 19, 1996.




A preferred method of making cryptomelane useful in the present invention comprises mixing an aqueous acidic manganese salt solution with a potassium permanganate solution. The acidic manganese salt solution preferably has a pH of from 0.5 to 3.0 and can be made acidic using any common acid, preferably acetic acid at a concentration of from 0.5 to 5.0 normal and more preferably from 1.0 to 2.0 normal. The mixture forms a slurry which is stirred at a temperature range of from 50° C. to 110° C. The slurry is filtered and the filtrate is dried at a temperature range of from 75° C. to 200° C. The resulting cryptomelane crystals have a surface area of typically in the range of at least 100 m


2


/g.




Catalytic materials with an average pore size of at least 5 nm in accordance with the present invention can be made, for example, by heat treating the material after crystallization. The post-crystallization material can be heated to temperatures sufficient to increase the average pore size to at least 5 nm. In most cases, the post-crystallization heat-treating temperature is in the range of from about 300 to 500° C.




Other useful compositions comprise manganese dioxide and optionally copper oxide and alumina and at least one precious metal component such as a platinum group metal supported on the manganese dioxide and where present copper oxide and alumina. Useful compositions contain up to 100, from 40 to 80 and preferably 50 to 70 weight percent manganese dioxide 10 to 60 and typically 30 to 50 percent copper oxide. Useful compositions include hopcalite (supplied by, for example, Mine Safety Applications, Inc.) which is about 60 percent manganese dioxide and about 40 percent copper oxide; and Carulite® 200 (sold by Carus Chemical Co.) which is reported to have 60 to 75 weight percent manganese dioxide, 11 to 14 percent copper oxide and 15 to 16 percent aluminum oxide. The surface area of Carulite® 200 is reported to be about 180 m


2


/g. Calcining at 450° C. reduces the surface area of the Carulite® by about fifty percent (50%) without significantly affecting activity. It is preferred to calcine manganese compounds at from 300° C. to 500° C. and more preferably 350° C. to 450° C. Calcining at 550° C. causes a great loss of surface area and ozone treatment activity. Calcining the Carulite® after ball milling with acetic acid and coating on a substrate can improve adhesion of the coating to a substrate.




Other compositions to treat ozone can comprise a manganese dioxide component and precious metal components such as platinum group metal components. While both components are catalytically active, the manganese dioxide can also support the precious metal component. The platinum group metal component preferably is a palladium and/or platinum component. The amount of platinum group metal compound preferably ranges from about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent (based on the weight of the platinum group metal) of the composition. Preferably, where platinum is present it is present in amounts of from 0.1 to 5 weight percent, with useful and preferred amounts on pollutant treating catalyst volume, based on the volume of the supporting article, ranging from about 0.5 to about 70 g/ft


3


. The amount of the palladium component preferably ranges from about 2 to about 10 weight percent of the composition, with useful and preferred amounts on pollutant treating catalyst volume ranging from about 10 to about 250 g/ft


3


.




Various useful and preferred pollutant treating catalyst compositions, especially those containing a catalytically active component such as a precious metal catalytic component, can comprise a suitable support material such as a refractory oxide support. The preferred refractory oxide can be selected from the group consisting of silica, alumina, titania, ceria, zirconia and chromia, and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the support is at least one activated, high surface area compound selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, titania, silica-alumina, silica-zirconia, alumina silicates, alumina zirconia, alumina-chromia and alumina-ceria. The refractory oxide can be in suitable form including bulk particulate form typically having particle sizes ranging from about 0.1 to about 100 and preferably 1 to 10 μm or in sol form also having a particle size ranging from about 1 to about 50 and preferably about 1 to about 10 nm. A preferred titania sol support comprises titania having a particle size ranging from about 1 to about 10, and typically from about 2 to 5 nm.




Also useful as a preferred support is a coprecipitate of a manganese oxide and zirconia. This composition can be made as recited in U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,041, incorporated herein by reference. The coprecipitated support material preferably comprises in a ratio based on the weight of manganese and zirconium metals from about 5:95 to 95:5; preferably from about 10:90 to 75:25; more preferably from about 10:90 to 50:50; and most preferably from about 15:85 to 50:50. A useful and preferred embodiment comprises a Mn:Zr weight ratio of about 20:80. U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,041 describes a preferred method to make a coprecipitate of a manganese oxide component and a zirconia component. A zirconia oxide and manganese oxide material may be prepared by mixing aqueous solutions of suitable zirconium oxide precursors such as zirconium oxynitrate, zirconium acetate, zirconium oxychloride, or zirconium oxysulfate and a suitable manganese oxide precursor such as manganese nitrate, manganese acetate, manganese dichloride or manganese dibromide, adding a sufficient amount of a base such as ammonium hydroxide to obtain a pH of from about 8 to 9, filtering the resulting precipitate, washing with water, and drying at a temperature of from about 450° to 500° C.




A useful support for a catalyst to treat ozone is selected from a refractory 5 oxide support, preferably alumina and silica-alumina with a more preferred support being a silica-alumina support comprising from about 1% to 10% by weight of silica and from about 90% to 99% by weight of alumina.




The average pore size of the catalytic material including the preferred materials described above is at least 5 nm, preferably at least 10 nm, more preferably from about 15 to 50 nm. At this average pore size, any water molecules which enter the pores are readily disengaged from catalytic sites without the imposition of excessive energy such as thermal energy. Accordingly, the method of the present invention is particularly suited to the catalytic conversion of a pollutant-containing gas (e.g. exhaust gas) at reduced operating temperatures. The method of the present invention is particularly suited to the efficient and effective conversion of pollutants to harmless by-products when an engine of an automotive vehicle is under startup conditions (i.e. generally less than 45° C.). The catalytic materials of the present invention are particularly suited for the conversion of carbon monoxide and ozone.




EXAMPLE 1




61 grams of a powdered catalytic material containing noncrystalline KMn


8


O


16


prepared by methods described in “Microstructural Study of Hollandite-type MnO


2


Nano-fibers” M. Benaissa et al.


App. Physics Letters


, Vol. 70, No. 16, pp.2120-2122 (1997) and “Nickel Hydroxide and other Nanophase Cathode Materials For Rechargeable Batteries” D. E. Reisner et al.


J. Power Sources


Vol. 65, No. 1-2, pp. 231-233 (1997) was treated in the following manner. The material is comprised of primary crystallites having a fibrous shape with aspect ratios of about 10:1 (i.e. 10-100 nm wide×100-1,000 nm long). The fibrous crystallites form loosely compacted subspherical agglomerates resembling nests up to about 10 μm across. The bulk of density of the material is about 0.3 to 0.6 g/cm


3


. The powder was pressed, granulated and sized so that the resulting material had an average pore size of 32.2 nm, a pore volume (the total volume divided by the average pore size) of 0.98 cm


3


/g and a surface area of 122 m


2


/g. Equal volumes (0.13 cm


3


) of the powder were loaded into glass tubes and secured into a bed with glass wool. The samples were run on a temperature and humidity controlled flow reactor equipped with an ozone generator and UV ozone analyzer.




A gas containing 5 ppm of ozone in air was passed through the sample bed at a space velocity of 150,000 hr


−1


at 45° C. with a dew point of 17° C. for 2 hours. The instantaneous conversion of ozone to oxygen at the end of two hours is shown in Table 1.

















TABLE 1













AVG.








SUR-





PORE







FACE




PORE




DIAM-




OZONE







AREA


a


,




VOLUME


b


,




ETER




CONVERSION







m


2


/g




cm


3


/g




nm




% SAMPLE MASS





























EXAMPLE 1




122




0.98




32.2




99




61 mg






COMPARATIVE




44




0.21




18.6




99




91 mg






EXAMPLE 1






COMPARATIVE




84




0.20




9.4




72




135 mg 






EXAMPLE 2







(1.3 hr)













a


BET surface area measured by N


2


adsorption after drying sample at 250° C.












b


Total pore volume and average pore diameter determined by N


2


adsorption.













As shown in Table 1, the % conversion of ozone for Example 1 was 99%. This example employed an average pore diameter and surface area which minimized capillary condensation. The % conversion was achieved with a low mass of catalytic material.




COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1




91 grams of a starting material containing activated MnO


2


obtained from Johnson Matthey Alfa Aesar (Technical Grade Stock No. 14340) was comprised of nearly equant or subspherical crystallites with diameters of from about 50 to 100 nm. The crystallites form dense aggregates and agglomerates up to about 20 μm across. The bulk density of this material is from about 1.1 to 1.3 g/m


2


. The final catalytic material was obtained by heating the starting material to 450° C. for 2 hours to obtain an average pore size distribution of 18.6 nm.




As shown in Table 1 the % conversion of ozone initiated by the catalytic material was 99%. However, a larger mass of catalytic material was needed to achieve high conversion rates due to the relatively small surface area (44 m


2


/g) and pore volume (0.21 cm


3


/g) as compared to the catalytic material of Example 1.




COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2




The same catalytic material employed in Comparative Example 2 was used except that the step of heating to 450° C. was omitted. The resulting material was comprised of nearly equant or subspherical crystallites on the order of about 5 to 25 nm across that form subspherical aggregates and agglomerates up to 20 μm across, with an average pore size distribution of 9.4 nm. The bulk density of the material is between 0.9 and 1.1 g/cm


3


.




The catalytic material was treated in the same manner as in Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 except that the reaction was terminated after 1.3 hours because the conversion rates were decreasing. The results of this comparative example showing the effectiveness of converting ozone to oxygen is shown in Table 1. The conversion rate for this comparative Example was only 72% despite using more than twice the amount of the catalytic material.




As shown in Table 1, the highest conversion rate with the lowest mass of material is achieved when the catalytic material (Example 1) has an average pore size equal to or exceeding about 5.0 nm, a pore volume equal to or exceeding about 0.9 cm


3


/g and a surface area equal to or exceeding 100 m


2


/g.




As further shown in Table 1, the comparative examples showed significantly lower conversion rates for even greater masses of material.



Claims
  • 1. A catalytic composition for catalyzing a reaction of a pollutant-containing gas comprising at least one catalytic material comprising manganese and having an average pore size of at least 5 nm and a surface area of at least 122 m2/g.
  • 2. The catalytic material of claim 1 wherein the at least one catalytic material has an average pore size of at least 10 nm.
  • 3. The catalytic material of claim 2 wherein the average pore size is from about 15 to 50 nm.
  • 4. The catalytic material of claim 1 wherein the catalytic material includes manganese oxide.
  • 5. The catalytic material of claim 1 wherein the catalytic material is substantially manganese oxide.
  • 6. The catalytic material of claim 5 wherein the catalytic material includes XMn8O16 wherein X is a metal ion.
  • 7. The catalytic material of claim 6 wherein X is selected from the group consisting of alkali metals and alkaline earth metals.
  • 8. The catalytic material of claim 6 wherein X is potassium.
  • 9. The catalytic material of claim 1 having a pore volume of at least 0.9 cm3/g.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/046,103 filed Mar. 23, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 6,156,283, issued Dec. 5, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (180)
Number Name Date Kind
1484782 Heise Feb 1924 A
1628344 Walsh May 1927 A
1863015 Kamrath Jun 1932 A
1937488 Jenness Nov 1933 A
1937489 Jenness Nov 1933 A
2213017 Perkins Aug 1940 A
2455734 Clausen Dec 1948 A
2473563 Beja et al. Jun 1949 A
2551823 Buttner et al. May 1951 A
2658742 Suter et al. Nov 1953 A
2701104 Fox Feb 1955 A
2956860 Welsh Oct 1960 A
2966339 Morgan Dec 1960 A
3110300 Brown et al. Nov 1963 A
3147100 Wilber Sep 1964 A
3242013 Mehne et al. Mar 1966 A
3269801 Boberg et al. Aug 1966 A
3356452 Moore Dec 1967 A
3414440 Moore Dec 1968 A
3565203 Ashton et al. Feb 1971 A
3596441 Luedahl Aug 1971 A
3640683 Miyazaki et al. Feb 1972 A
3685983 Louzos Aug 1972 A
3738088 Colosimo Jun 1973 A
3770868 Swinkels et al. Nov 1973 A
3823533 Alverson et al. Jul 1974 A
3837149 West et al. Sep 1974 A
3859788 King et al. Jan 1975 A
3864118 Schumacher et al. Feb 1975 A
3883637 Benedict May 1975 A
3915837 Feige, Jr. Oct 1975 A
3959021 Nishino et al. May 1976 A
3993597 Stiles Nov 1976 A
4006217 Faber et al. Feb 1977 A
4007875 Stolz et al. Feb 1977 A
4059544 Yamaguchi et al. Nov 1977 A
4089928 Foroglou May 1978 A
4101296 Lowther Jul 1978 A
4134860 Hindin et al. Jan 1979 A
4141963 Miller Feb 1979 A
4160806 Long et al. Jul 1979 A
4171211 Carter Oct 1979 A
4173549 Kent et al. Nov 1979 A
4184983 Putz et al. Jan 1980 A
4195606 Wallis, Jr. et al. Apr 1980 A
4197366 Tamura et al. Apr 1980 A
4200609 Byrd Apr 1980 A
4206083 Chang Jun 1980 A
4207291 Byrd et al. Jun 1980 A
4214867 Hunter et al. Jul 1980 A
4234326 Bailey et al. Nov 1980 A
4237030 Noguchi et al. Dec 1980 A
4246253 Hunter Jan 1981 A
4261863 Kent et al. Apr 1981 A
4277360 Mellors et al. Jul 1981 A
4284618 Van der Heyden et al. Aug 1981 A
4285913 Soni et al. Aug 1981 A
4302490 Byrd Nov 1981 A
4310494 Welsh Jan 1982 A
4324645 Angevine et al. Apr 1982 A
4343776 Carr et al. Aug 1982 A
4348360 Chang et al. Sep 1982 A
4352321 Fukui et al. Oct 1982 A
4353815 Antos Oct 1982 A
4363787 Yoon Dec 1982 A
4367165 Asaoka et al. Jan 1983 A
4379129 Abe Apr 1983 A
4379817 Kozawa Apr 1983 A
4399185 Petrow Aug 1983 A
4402931 Tanabe et al. Sep 1983 A
4405507 Carr et al. Sep 1983 A
4405699 Kruger Sep 1983 A
4425145 Reese Jan 1984 A
4476104 Mellors Oct 1984 A
4477541 Fraioli Oct 1984 A
4483828 Laughlin et al. Nov 1984 A
4485073 Robertson et al. Nov 1984 A
4489043 Bowerman et al. Dec 1984 A
4537839 Cameron Aug 1985 A
4551254 Imada et al. Nov 1985 A
4579723 Weltmer et al. Apr 1986 A
4581219 Imada et al. Apr 1986 A
4585718 Uedaira et al. Apr 1986 A
4590059 Mellors May 1986 A
4595643 Koshiba et al. Jun 1986 A
4604336 Nardi Aug 1986 A
4619821 Ely Oct 1986 A
4625023 Mares et al. Nov 1986 A
4657887 Hardman et al. Apr 1987 A
4657889 Ganguli et al. Apr 1987 A
4662065 Marincic et al. May 1987 A
4665973 Limberg et al. May 1987 A
4666677 Ramus et al. May 1987 A
4670474 Hinnenkamp et al. Jun 1987 A
4684381 Wasylyniuk Aug 1987 A
4714694 Wan et al. Dec 1987 A
4733605 Hölter et al. Mar 1988 A
4734113 Takagi et al. Mar 1988 A
4738947 Wan et al. Apr 1988 A
4742038 Matsumoto May 1988 A
4818354 Preisler et al. Apr 1989 A
4824363 Abthoff et al. Apr 1989 A
4838910 Stollenwerk et al. Jun 1989 A
4857499 Ito et al. Aug 1989 A
4871709 Tatsushima et al. Oct 1989 A
4888316 Gardner et al. Dec 1989 A
4909815 Meyer Mar 1990 A
4921689 Walker et al. May 1990 A
4961762 Howeth Oct 1990 A
4975346 Lecerf et al. Dec 1990 A
5004487 Kowalczyk Apr 1991 A
5010051 Rudy Apr 1991 A
5024981 Speronello et al. Jun 1991 A
5057483 Wan Oct 1991 A
5080882 Yoshimoto et al. Jan 1992 A
5082570 Higgins et al. Jan 1992 A
5085266 Arold et al. Feb 1992 A
5092396 Murano et al. Mar 1992 A
5113836 Sweeten May 1992 A
5128306 Dettling et al. Jul 1992 A
5130109 Wan Jul 1992 A
5134109 Uchiyama et al. Jul 1992 A
5139992 Tauster et al. Aug 1992 A
5142864 Dunne Sep 1992 A
5145657 Kobayashi et al. Sep 1992 A
5145822 Falke et al. Sep 1992 A
5145825 Deeba et al. Sep 1992 A
5147429 Bartholomew et al. Sep 1992 A
5160586 Yoshimoto et al. Nov 1992 A
5162274 Deitz Nov 1992 A
5166012 Rossouw et al. Nov 1992 A
5176833 Vaughn et al. Jan 1993 A
5180502 Nishiki et al. Jan 1993 A
5187137 Terui et al. Feb 1993 A
5194233 Kitahara et al. Mar 1993 A
5212140 Yoshimoto et al. May 1993 A
5212142 Dettling May 1993 A
5214014 Yoshimoto et al. May 1993 A
5221649 Yoshimoto et al. Jun 1993 A
5221652 Tierney et al. Jun 1993 A
5221656 Clark et al. Jun 1993 A
5227144 Perez de la Garza Jul 1993 A
5232882 Yoshimoto et al. Aug 1993 A
5232886 Yoshimoto et al. Aug 1993 A
5250487 Wirtz et al. Oct 1993 A
5252299 Retallick Oct 1993 A
5254519 Wan et al. Oct 1993 A
5262129 Terada et al. Nov 1993 A
5277890 Wang et al. Jan 1994 A
5283041 Nguyen et al. Feb 1994 A
5283139 Newman et al. Feb 1994 A
5294499 Furukawa et al. Mar 1994 A
5296435 Kitaguchi et al. Mar 1994 A
5308591 Whittenberger May 1994 A
5317869 Takeuchi Jun 1994 A
5340562 O'Young et al. Aug 1994 A
5348726 Wang et al. Sep 1994 A
5356457 Pincheira Alvarez et al. Oct 1994 A
5382417 Haase Jan 1995 A
5391365 Wang et al. Feb 1995 A
5395534 Smith Mar 1995 A
5401477 Cawlfield et al. Mar 1995 A
5405594 Andersen et al. Apr 1995 A
5411643 Cawlfield et al. May 1995 A
5419882 Jibiki May 1995 A
5422331 Galligan et al. Jun 1995 A
5433772 Sikora Jul 1995 A
5447693 Ohta et al. Sep 1995 A
5523509 O'Young et al. Jun 1996 A
5620672 Galligan et al. Apr 1997 A
5635155 O'Young et al. Jun 1997 A
5676913 Cirillo et al. Oct 1997 A
5702674 O'Young et al. Dec 1997 A
5705078 Kurek et al. Jan 1998 A
5817595 Tejada et al. Oct 1998 A
5846641 Abeles et al. Dec 1998 A
6162530 Xiao et al. Dec 2000 A
6200542 Poles et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214303 Hoke et al. Apr 2001 B1
6340066 Dettling et al. Jan 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (73)
Number Date Country
822 053 Jan 1951 DE
1067691 Oct 1959 DE
1095128 Dec 1960 DE
1101160 Dec 1960 DE
1133154 Dec 1962 DE
215 5738 Jan 1973 DE
25 49 621 May 1977 DE
30 19 828 Nov 1980 DE
33 34 992 Apr 1985 DE
37 13 035 Oct 1988 DE
4007964 Sep 1991 DE
40 07 965 Sep 1991 DE
40 17 892 Dec 1991 DE
42 09 196 Jul 1993 DE
42 09 198 Jul 1993 DE
40 07 965 Mar 1994 DE
43 18 738 Jul 1994 DE
44 20 224 Jan 1995 DE
44 23 329 Jan 1995 DE
94 15 457.0 Jan 1995 DE
195 38 799 Apr 1997 DE
0 097 287 Jan 1984 EP
0 186 477 Jul 1986 EP
0 186 477 Jul 1986 EP
0 268 265 May 1988 EP
0 351 036 Jan 1990 EP
0 373 648 Jun 1990 EP
0 431 648 Jun 1991 EP
470 330 Feb 1992 EP
0 537 815 Apr 1993 EP
0 537 815 Apr 1993 EP
0 561 484 Sep 1993 EP
0 628 338 Dec 1994 EP
0 634 205 Jan 1995 EP
0 635 685 Jan 1995 EP
0 653 956 May 1995 EP
0 666 776 Aug 1995 EP
0 723 811 Jul 1996 EP
2 009 392 Jun 1979 GB
2 037 607 Jul 1980 GB
2 056 424 Mar 1981 GB
2 056 424 Mar 1981 GB
2 110 174 Jun 1983 GB
2 218 354 Nov 1989 GB
55106813 Aug 1970 JP
7-4011141 Mar 1974 JP
52148468 Dec 1977 JP
56059671 May 1981 JP
57122924 Jul 1982 JP
61035853 Feb 1986 JP
3-229645 Mar 1991 JP
4-110045 Apr 1992 JP
H4-176316 Jun 1992 JP
H4-297341 Oct 1992 JP
40-5007776 Jan 1993 JP
5023590 Feb 1993 JP
5038443 Feb 1993 JP
H6-13204 Jan 1994 JP
1 703 173 Jan 1992 SU
WO 9427709 Dec 1984 WO
WO 9011433 Oct 1990 WO
WO 9109755 Jul 1991 WO
WO 9305821 Apr 1993 WO
9310886 Jun 1993 WO
WO 9522395 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9609109 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9622146 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9622148 Jul 1996 WO
9711769 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9741948 Nov 1997 WO
9805412 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9806479 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9806480 Feb 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
SAE 931088 Calculation and Design of Cooling Systems by Eichiseder & Raab of Steyer Damler Puchag.
SAE 931089 Charge Air Cooler for Passenger Cars by Thierry Collette of Valeo Thermique Moteur.
SAE 931092 State of the Art & Future Developments of Aluminum Radiators for Cars & Trucks by Josef Kern & Jochen Eitel of Behr GmBH & Company.
SAE 931112 Air Max versus Coolant Flow to Control Discharge Air Temperature in Vehicle Heating and Air Conditioning Systems by Gary Rolling and Robert Cummings of Behr of America, Inc., and Gebhard Schweizer of Behr GmbH & Company.
SAE 931115 Engine Cooling Module Development Using Air Flow Management Technique by Refki El-Bourini & Samuel Chen of Calsonic Technical Center.
SAE 931120 A New Zeolite Energy Storage Concept for Cooling & Heating Sleeping Cabins in Trucks by Manfred Nonnenmann & Noureddine Khellifa of Behr GmbH & Company.
SAE 931121 Automotive Evaporator and Condenser Modelling by Francisco Castro, Francisco Tinaut & A.A. Rahman Ali of Universidad de Valladolid.
SAE 931125 Durability Concerns of Aluminum Air to Air Charge Air Coolers by Paul Richard Smith of Valeo Engine Cooling Inc.
Derwent Abstracts.
Additives for Dispersion Technology, published by Rhone Poulenc.
Bosch Automotive Handbook, Second Edition, pp. 301-303, and 349-351 published by Robert Bosch GmbH, 1986.
Gerhartz, et al., Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Ed. 5, vol. A5, Cancer Chemotherapy to Ceramic Colorants, 1986, VCH Verlag, De, Weinheim, pp. 336, 347-353.
Maganese Compounds, vol. 15, pp. 1003-1050.
Mark, et al., Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Ed. 3, vol. 5, Castor Oil to Chlorosulfuric Acid, 1989, Wiley & Sons, NY, pp. 22-23, 40, 49-51.
“Microstructural Study of Hollandite-type MnO2 Nano-fibers”, M. Benaissa et al., App. Physics Letters, vol. 70, No. 16, pp. 2120-2122 (1977).
“Nickel Hydroxide and Other Nanophase Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries”, D.E. Reisner et al., J. Power Sources, vol. 65, No. 1-2, pp. 231-233 (1977).
Taylor, The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, vol. I: Thermo Dynamics, Fluid Flow, Performance, Second Edition, Rev.; The MIT Press, 1985 at pp. 304-306 for radiator and fin design; and p. 392 for after coolers.
McKenzie, “The Synthesis of Birnessite, Cryptomelane, and Some Other Oxides and Hydroxides of Manganese”, Mineralogical Magazine, Dec. 1971, vol. 38, pp. 493-502.
Newpaper Article with Informal Translation—Mobile Air Purification.
Newspaper Article with Informal Translation—Super-Kat in Cars ensures clean air forever.
O'Young, “Hydrothermal Synthesis of Maganese Oxides with Tunnel Stuctures” Symposium on Advances in Zeolites and Pillerd Clay Structures, the Division of Petroleum Chemistry, Inc., American Chemical Society, New York City Meeting, Aug. 25-30, 1991, pp. 348-355.
Ouside submission from Litman Law Office, Ltd., in the Application of Leo K. Brown for an “Environmental Air Filtration System for Vehicles”.
Outside submission from Attorney Conrad O. Gardner in the Application of “A System for Ambient Air Pollution Processing by Motor Vehicles”.