Patent Grant
8864984
This invention relates to compositions and methods for the production of biochemicals such as biofuel, aromatic, and olefin compounds, and more specifically, to compositions and methods for biochemical production via catalytic pyrolysis.
With its low cost and wide availability, lignocellulosic biomass has been under worldwide-study as a feedstock for renewable liquid biofuels. One impetus, in particular, is that biomass derived fuels have zero net CO2 emissions if produced without the use of fossil fuels. However, lignocellulosic biomass is not currently commonly used as a liquid fuel source because typical current conversion processes are not considered to be economically feasible. Several routes are being examined to convert solid biomass to a liquid fuel. At low temperatures (e.g., 200-260° C.) diesel range alkanes can be produced by a multi-step aqueous-phase processing (APP) of aqueous carbohydrate solutions involving dehydration, aldol-condensation and dehydration/hydrogenation (G. W. Huber, J. A. Dumesic, Catalysis Today 2006, 111, 119-132.). However, APP requires that solid lignocellulosic biomass first be converted into aqueous carbohydrates. At higher temperatures (˜800° C.) solid biomass can be reformed to produce synthesis gas through partial oxidation over catalysts in an auto thermal packed bed reactor. (P. J. Dauenhauer, J. D. Dreyer, N. J. Degenstein, L. D. Schnudt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5864-5867.). The synthesis gas produced from the reaction can be fed to a secondary process to make fuels and chemicals. For certain applications, an ideal process for solid biomass conversion may involve the production of a liquid fuel that fits into existing infrastructure from solid biomass in a single step, at short residence times. Unfortunately, neither the APP nor syngas process meets such criteria.
Another approach for biofuel production is fast pyrolysis, which can involve, for example, rapidly heating biomass (e.g., ˜500° C./sec) to intermediate temperatures (e.g., ˜400-600° C.) followed by rapid cooling (e.g., residence times 1-2 s). (See, A. V. Bridgwater, Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Handbook Volume 2, CPL Press, Newbury, UK, 2002.) Conventional fast pyrolysis often produces a thermally unstable liquid product mixture called bio-oils, an acidic combustible liquid mixture of more than 300 compounds that degrades with time.
However, bio-oils are not compatible with existing liquid transportation fuels, such as gasoline and diesel, and yields are low. Accordingly, there remains an on-going search in the art for an economical, efficient route for the production of useful biofuels and related compounds from solid biomass.
This invention relates generally to compositions and methods for the production of biochemicals such as biofuel, aromatic, and olefin compounds. The subject matter of this invention involves, in some cases, interrelated products, alternative solutions to a particular problem, and/or a plurality of different uses of one or more systems and/or articles.
In one set of embodiments, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid catalyst in a fluidized bed reactor; feeding a solid hydrocarbonaceous material to the fluidized bed reactor at a mass-normalized space velocity of between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 10 hour−1; pyrolyzing within the fluidized bed reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the solid catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
In some cases, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid catalyst in a reactor; providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor; pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the solid catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products; and separating the one or more hydrocarbon products from the catalyst by passing the catalyst and the one or more hydrocarbon products through a separator at a separator residence time of at least about 1 second and at a separator temperature of greater than about 500° C.
In some instances, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a hydrocarbonaceous material in a first reactor comprising a circulating fluidized bed reactor or a turbulent fluidized bed reactor; pyrolyzing within the first reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products in a second reactor using a catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
In some embodiments, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material in a first reactor comprising a fluidized bed reactor; pyrolyzing within the first reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products in a second reactor using a catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
A method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises, in some embodiments, introducing a fluidization fluid into a fluidized bed reactor, the fluidization fluid having an average fluidization fluid residence time of at least about 1 second in the reactor; providing a solid catalyst in the fluidized bed reactor; feeding a solid hydrocarbonaceous material to the fluidized bed reactor; pyrolyzing within the fluidized bed reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products, wherein the fluidized bed reactor has a temperature of about 500° C. to about 1000° C.; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the solid catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
In some embodiments, a fluid hydrocarbon product comprises a fluid portion of a reaction product of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material, the fluid hydrocarbon product comprising an amount of aromatic compounds that is at least 15 wt % of the total amount of the solid hydrocarbonaceous reactant material used in forming the reaction product and which is calculated as the weight of the aromatic compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the reaction product.
In some embodiments, a method for producing a fluid hydrocarbon product from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a catalyst in a reactor; pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the fluid hydrocarbon product, wherein the fluid hydrocarbon product comprises an amount of aromatic compounds that is at least 15 wt % of the total amount of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products and which is calculated as the weight of the aromatic compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by the weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products.
In some instances, a method for producing a fluid hydrocarbon product from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a catalyst in a reactor; pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the fluid hydrocarbon product, wherein the fluid hydrocarbon product comprises an amount of olefin compounds that is at least 7 wt % of the total amount of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products and which is calculated as the weight of the olefin compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by the weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products.
In some embodiments, a fluid hydrocarbon product comprises a fluid portion of a reaction product of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material, the fluid hydrocarbon product comprising an amount of olefin compounds that is at least 7 wt % of the total amount of the solid hydrocarbonaceous reactant material used in forming the reaction product and which is calculated as the weight of the olefin compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the reaction product.
A method for selectively producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a hydrocarbonaceous material comprises, in some embodiments, providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a zeolite catalyst comprising a silica to alumina molar ratio of from about 30:1 to about 150:1 within a reactor; pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products, wherein the hydrocarbonaceous material and catalyst are heated at a heating rate of greater than about 50° C./s, and wherein the reactor has a volume of at least 1 liter; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to selectively produce said one or more fluid hydrocarbon products and to minimize coke production.
In some embodiments, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid catalyst in a circulating fluidized bed reactor; feeding a solid hydrocarbonaceous material to the circulating fluidized bed reactor, such that the mass ratio of the catalyst to the hydrocarbonaceous material in the feed is from about 0.5:1 to about 20:1; pyrolyzing within the circulating fluidized bed reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products, wherein the reaction takes place at a temperature of about 500° C. to about 1000° C.; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the solid catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
In some instances, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid catalyst in a circulating fluidized bed reactor; feeding a solid hydrocarbonaceous material to the circulating fluidized bed reactor, wherein the mass ratio of the catalyst to the hydrocarbonaceous material in the feed is from about 0.5:1 to about 20:1; pyrolyzing within the circulating fluidized bed reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products, wherein the mass-normalized space velocity of the hydrocarbonaceous material is between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 10 hours−1; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using the solid catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products.
A method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises, in some instances, providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and one or more catalysts in a reactor, wherein at least about 95% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within a first size distribution or a second size distribution; at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within the first size distribution; at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within the second size distribution; and the first and second size distributions do not overlap; and pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the pyrolysis products with the catalysts to produce the one or more hydrocarbon products and at least partially deactivated catalyst.
In some embodiments, a method for producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and one or more catalysts in a reactor, wherein at least about 95% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within a first distribution and a second distribution, wherein the first distribution is between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms and the second distribution is different from and does not overlap with the first distribution; at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms; and at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within the second distribution; and pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the pyrolysis products with the one or more catalysts to produce the one or more fluid hydrocarbon products and at least partially deactivated catalyst.
A composition comprises, in some embodiments, one or more catalysts, wherein at least about 95% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms or between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms; at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms; and at least about 5% of the pores of the one or more zeolite catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms.
In some embodiments, a method for producing a fluid hydrocarbon product from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises providing a composition comprising a solid catalyst and a solid hydrocarbonaceous material to a reactor, wherein the mass ratio of the catalyst to the hydrocarbonaceous material in the composition is between about 0.5:1 and about 20:1; heating the composition provided within the reactor, wherein the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor is between about 1 minute and about 4 minutes; pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material to produce pyrolysis products; and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the pyrolysis products with the solid catalyst to produce the fluid hydrocarbon product.
A method for selectively producing one or more fluid hydrocarbon products from a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprises, in some embodiments, providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprising a first component and a second component in a reactor, wherein the first and second components are different; providing first and second catalysts in the reactor, wherein the first catalyst is selective for catalytically reacting the first component or a derivative thereof to produce a fluid hydrocarbon product, and the second catalyst is selective for catalytically reacting the second component or a derivative thereof to produce a fluid hydrocarbon product; and pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the pyrolysis products with the first and second catalysts to produce the one or more hydrocarbon products and at least partially deactivated catalyst.
Other aspects, embodiments and features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The accompanying figures are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. For purposes of clarity, not every component is labeled in every figure, nor is every component of each embodiment of the invention shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention. All patent applications and patents incorporated herein by reference are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, this specification, including definitions, will control.
Non-limiting embodiments of this invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying figures, which are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the figures, each identical or nearly identical component illustrated is typically represented by a single numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component is labeled in every figure, nor is every component of each embodiment of the invention shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention. In the figures:
The specification discloses inventive compositions and methods for the production of biochemicals such as biofuel, aromatic, and olefin compounds, and more specifically, compositions and methods for the production of biochemicals via catalytic pyrolysis. Some embodiments relate to methods for the production of fluid (e.g., a liquid, a supercritical fluid, and/or a gas) hydrocarbon products such as aromatic compounds (e.g., benzene, toluene, naphthalene, xylene, etc.) and olefins (e.g., ethene, propene, butene, etc.) via catalytic pyrolysis processes (e.g., catalytic fast pyrolysis). In certain embodiments, the hydrocarbon products or a portion thereof are liquids at standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP—i.e. 25 degrees C. and 100 kPa absolute pressure). Some such methods may involve the use of a composition comprising a mixture of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a heterogeneous pyrolytic catalyst component. In some embodiments, the mixture may be pyrolyzed at high temperatures (e.g., between 500° C. and 1000° C.). The pyrolysis may be conducted for an amount of time at least partially sufficient for production of discrete, identifiable fluid hydrocarbon products. Some embodiments involve heating the mixture of catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material at relatively high heating rates (e.g., from about 400° C. per second to about 1000° C. per second). The methods described herein may also involve the use of specialized catalysts. For example, in some cases, zeolite catalysts are used; optionally, the catalysts used herein may have high silica to alumina molar ratios. In some instances, the composition fed to the pyrolysis reactor has a relatively high catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio (e.g., from about 5:1 to about 20:1).
Some embodiments can be directed to a single-stage method for the pyrolysis of biomass. Such a method can comprise providing or using a single-stage pyrolysis apparatus. A single-stage pyrolysis apparatus is one in which pyrolysis and subsequent catalytic reactions are carried out in a single vessel. In some embodiments, the single-stage pyrolysis apparatus comprises a fluidized bed reactor. Multi-stage apparatuses can also be used for the production of fluid hydrocarbon products, as described in more detail below.
As used herein, the terms “pyrolysis” and “pyrolyzing” are given their conventional meaning in the art and are used to refer to the transformation of a compound, e.g., hydrocarbonaceous material, into one or more other substances, e.g., volatile organic compounds, gases and coke, by heat alone without oxidation, which may take place with or without the use of a catalyst. “Catalytic pyrolysis” refers to pyrolysis performed in the presence of a catalyst, and may involve steps as described in more detail below. Example of catalytic pyrolysis processes are outlined, for example, in Huber, G. W. et al, “Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering,” Chem. Rev. 106, (2006), pp. 4044-4098, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
As used herein, the term “biomass” is given its conventional meaning in the art and is used to refer to any organic source of energy or chemicals that is renewable. Its major components can be (1) trees (wood) and all other vegetation; (2) agricultural products and wastes (corn, fruit, garbage ensilage, etc.); (3) algae and other marine plants; (4) metabolic wastes (manure, sewage); and (5) cellulosic urban waste. Examples of biomass materials are described, for example, in Huber, G. W. et al, “Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering,” Chem. Rev. 106, (2006), pp. 4044-4098.
The inventors have discovered within the context of the invention that for some reactions, certain changes in reaction conditions and combinations of such changes can produce favorable products and/or yields, lower yields of coke formation and/or more controlled product formation (e.g., higher production of aromatics and/or olefins relative to other fuels) that may not otherwise be obtained but for the changes in reaction conditions. For example, the use of elevated temperatures (e.g., in the reactor and/or the separator) may produce favorable products and/or yields from reactions that may not occur at lower temperatures. The inventors have also discovered within the context of the invention that it may be advantageous, in some cases, to heat the feed stream (e.g., a gaseous or liquid hydrocarbonaceous material, a solid hydrocarbonaceous material, a mixture of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a solid catalyst, etc.) at a relatively fast rate as it enters the reactor. Also, the inventors have found that providing a feed with a high mass ratio of catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material may produce desirable yields of aromatic and/or olefin products. For example, without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors currently believe that high heating rates and high catalyst-to-feed mass ratios may facilitate introduction of volatile organic compounds, formed from pyrolysis of the hydrocarbonaceous feed, into the catalyst before they thermally decompose, thus leading to high yields of aromatic and/or olefin compounds. Relatively low mass-normalized space velocities have also shown to produce desirable yields of aromatic and/or olefin compounds. In addition, the inventors have discovered that relatively long residence times of hydrocarbonaceous material in high-temperature components of the system (e.g., the reactor and/or the separator) may allow adequate time for additional chemical reactions to form desirable products.
The inventors have also discovered within the context of the invention that the use of catalysts with specific properties may be useful in forming a relatively large amount of aromatic and/or olefin products. For example, in certain embodiments, ZSM-5, in combination with certain reaction conditions, was found to preferentially produce aromatic and/or olefin compounds. Additionally, certain catalysts that include Bronstead acid sites and/or well-ordered pore structures were found to selectively produce aromatic and/or olefin compounds in some cases. Catalyst pore size may also be used, in some cases, to affect the amounts and types of product compounds produced.
The embodiments described herein also involve chemical process designs used to perform catalytic pyrolysis. In some cases, the processes may involve the use of one or more fluidized bed reactors (e.g., a circulating fluidized bed reactor, turbulent fluidized bed reactor, bubbling fluidized bed reactor, etc.). The process designs described herein may optionally involve specialized handling of the material fed to one or more reactors. For example, in some embodiments, the feed material may be dried, cooled, and/or ground prior to supplying the material to a reactor. Other aspects of the invention relate to product compositions produced using the process designs described herein.
Without being bound to a particular mode of action or order of steps of the overall thermal/catalytic conversion process, catalytic pyrolysis is believed to involve at least partial thermal pyrolysis of hydrocarbonaceous material (e.g., solid biomass such as cellulose) to produce one or more pyrolysis products (e.g., volatile organics, gases, solid coke, etc.) and catalytic reaction of at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using a catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce fluid hydrocarbon products. The catalytic reaction may involve volatile organics entering into a catalyst (e.g., a zeolite catalyst) where they are converted into, for example, hydrocarbons such as aromatics and olefins, in addition to carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, water, and coke. Inside or upon contact with the catalyst, the biomass-derived species may undergo a series of dehydration, decarbonylation, decarboxylation, isomerization, oligomerization, and dehydrogenation reactions that lead to aromatics, olefins, CO, CO2 and water. A challenge with selective aromatic and/or olefin production is minimizing coke formation. For instance, the overall stoichiometries for conversion of xylitol and glucose to toluene, CO, and H2O are shown in Equations 1 and 2, respectively.
C5O5H12→12/22C7H8(76% carbon yield)+26/22CO (24% carbon yield)+84/22H2O (1)
C6O6H12→12/22C7H8(63% carbon yield)+48/22CO (36% carbon yield)+84/22H2O (2)
As shown in these equations, oxygen must be removed from the biomass-derived species as a combination of CO (or CO2), and H2O when aromatics are produced. The maximum theoretical yields of toluene for xylitol and glucose are 76% and 63%, respectively.
Other challenges associated with biomass conversion are the removal of oxygen and the enrichment of the hydrogen content of the hydrocarbon product. A factor, commonly referred to as the effective hydrogen to carbon molar ratio, H/Ceff, illustrates the chemistry required for efficient conversion of biomass-derived oxygenates.
The H/Ceff molar ratios of glucose, sorbitol and glycerol (all biomass-derived compounds) are 0, ⅓ and ⅔ respectively. By comparison, the H/Ceff molar ratio of petroleum-derived feeds ranges from slightly larger than 2 (for liquid alkanes) to 1 (for benzene). In this respect, biomass can be viewed as hydrogen deficient, as compared to petroleum-based feedstocks.
Some such and other issues of fuel production can be addressed utilizing the methods and processes described herein. For instance, aromatics and/or olefins can be controllably produced from hydrocarbonaceous material feeds by controlling a variety of process parameters including, for example: catalyst selection, hydrocarbonaceous material selection, heating rates, reaction temperature, catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous mass ratios (e.g., in the feed stream, in the reactor, etc.), catalyst silica to alumina molar ratios, mass-normalized space velocities, residence times in various processing components, among others. In some embodiments, process parameters may be selected such that coke formation rates are relatively low.
In one aspect, chemical processes for the reaction of hydrocarbonaceous material are described. The process may involve, in some embodiments, pyrolyzing within a reactor (e.g., a fluidized bed reactor) at least a portion of a hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products. In addition, the process may involve catalytically reacting at least a portion of the one or more pyrolysis products using a catalyst under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more fluid hydrocarbon products. In some embodiments, one or more fluid hydrocarbon products may be produced from said pyrolysis products by dehydration, decarbonylation, decarboxylation, isomerization, oligomerization, and dehydrogenation reactions. The pyrolysis and catalytic reaction processes may occur, in some cases, in a single reactor. The chemical processes may be used, in some cases, for specific fluid hydrocarbon product production (e.g., aromatics and/or olefins).
In some embodiments, the feed composition (e.g., in feed stream 10 of
In some embodiments, for example when solid hydrocarbonaceous materials are used, moisture 12 may optionally be removed from the feed composition prior to being fed to the reactor, e.g., by an optional dryer 14. Removal of moisture from the feed stream may be advantageous for several reasons. For example, the moisture in the feed stream may require additional energy input in order to heat the feed to a temperature sufficiently high to achieve pyrolysis. Variations in the moisture content of the feed may lead to difficulties in controlling the temperature of the reactor. In addition, removal of moisture from the feed can reduce or eliminate the need to process the water during later processing steps.
In some embodiments, the feed composition may be dried until the feed composition comprises less than about 10%, less than about 5%, less than about 2%, or less than about 1% water by weight. Suitable equipment capable of removing water from the feed composition is known to those skilled in the art. As an example, in one set of embodiments, the dryer comprises an oven heated to a particular temperature (e.g., at least about 80° C., at least about 100° C., at least about 150° C., or higher) through which the feed composition is continuously, semi-continuously, or periodically passed. In some cases, the dryer may comprise a vacuum chamber into which the feed composition is processed as a batch. Other embodiments of the dryer may combine elevated temperatures with vacuum operation. The dryer may be integrally connected to the reactor or may be provided as a separate unit from the reactor.
In some instances, the particle size of the feed composition may be reduced in an optional grinding system 16 prior to passing the feed to the reactor. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the ground feed composition exiting the grinding system may comprise no more than about 50%, not more than about 25%, no more than about 10%, no more than about 5%, no more than about 2% of the average diameter of the feed composition fed to the grinding system. Large-particle feed material may be more easily transportable and less messy than small-particle feed material. On the other hand, in some cases it may be advantageous to feed small particles to the reactor (as discussed below). The use of a grinding system allows for the transport of large-particle feed between the source and the process, while enabling the feed of small particles to the reactor.
Suitable equipment capable of grinding the feed composition is known to those skilled in the art. For example, the grinding system may comprise an industrial mill (e.g., hammer mill, ball mill, etc.), a unit with blades (e.g., chipper, shredder, etc.), or any other suitable type of grinding system. In some embodiments, the grinding system may comprise a cooling system (e.g., an active cooling systems such as a pumped fluid heat exchanger, a passive cooling system such as one including fins, etc.), which may be used to maintain the feed composition at relatively low temperatures (e.g., ambient temperature) prior to introducing the feed composition to the reactor. The grinding system may be integrally connected to the reactor or may be provided as a separate unit from the reactor. While the grinding step is shown following the drying step in
In some cases, grinding and cooling of the hydrocarbonaceous material may be achieved using separate units. Cooling of the hydrocarbonaceous material may be desirable, for example, to reduce or prevent unwanted decomposition of the feed material prior to passing it to the reactor. In one set of embodiments, the hydrocarbonaceous material may be passed to a grinding system to produce a ground hydrocarbonaceous material. The ground hydrocarbonaceous material may then be passed from the grinding system to a cooling system and cooled. The hydrocarbonaceous material may be cooled to a temperature of lower than about 300° C., lower than about 200° C., lower than about 100° C., lower than about 75° C., lower than about 50° C., lower than about 35° C., or lower than about 20° C. prior to introducing the hydrocarbonaceous material into the reactor. In embodiments that include the use of a cooling system, the cooling system includes an active cooling unit (e.g., a heat exchanger) capable of lowering the temperature of the biomass. In some embodiments, two or more of the drier, grinding system, and cooling system may be combined in a single unit. The cooling system may be, in some embodiments, directly integrated with one or more reactors.
As illustrated in
As used herein, the term “fluidized bed reactor” is given its conventional meaning in the art and is used to refer to reactors comprising a vessel that can contain a granular solid material (e.g., silica particles, catalyst particles, etc.), in which a fluid (e.g., a gas or a liquid) is passed through the granular solid material at velocities sufficiently high as to suspend the solid material and cause it to behave as though it were a fluid. Examples of fluidized bed reactors are described in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (online), Vol. 11, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience, c2001-, pages 791-825, incorporated herein by reference. The term “circulating fluidized bed reactor” is also given its conventional meaning in the art and is used to refer to fluidized bed reactors in which the granular solid material is passed out of the reactor, circulated through a line in fluid communication with the reactor, and recycled back into the reactor. Examples of circulating fluidized bed reactors are described in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Online), Vol. 11, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience, c2001-, pages 791-825.
Bubbling fluidized bed reactors and turbulent fluidized bed reactors are also known to those skilled in the art. In bubbling fluidized bed reactors, the fluid stream used to fluidize the granular solid material is operated at a sufficiently low flow rate such that bubbles and voids are observed within the volume of the fluidized bed during operation. In turbulent fluidized bed reactors, the flow rate of the fluidizing stream is higher than that employed in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor, and hence, bubbles and voids are not observed within the volume of the fluidized bed during operation. Examples of bubbling and turbulent fluidized bed reactors are described in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (online), Vol. 11, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience, c2001-, pages 791-825, incorporated herein by reference.
The reactor(s) may have any suitable size for performing the processes described herein. For example, the reactor may have a volume between 0.1-1 L, 1-50 L, 50-100 L, 100-250 L, 250-500 L, 500-1000 L, 1000-5000 L, 5000-10,000 L, or 10,000-50,000 L. In some instances, the reactor has a volume greater than about 1 L, or in other instances, greater than about 10 L, 50 L, 100 L, 250 L, 500 L, 1,000 L, or 10,000 L. Reactor volumes greater than 50,000 L are also possible. The reactor may be cylindrical, spherical, or any other suitable shape.
The inventors have discovered that higher yields of biofuel production, lower yields of coke formation, and/or more controlled product formation (e.g., higher production of aromatics and/or olefins relative to other products) can be achieved when particular combinations of reactions conditions and system components are implemented in methods and systems described herein. For example, reaction conditions such as temperature of the reactor and/or separator, reactor pressure, heating rate of the feed stream, catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio, mass-normalized space velocities, residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor, residence time of the reaction products in the separator, and/or catalyst type (as well as silica to alumina molar ratio for zeolite catalysts) can be controlled to achieve beneficial results, as described below.
The reactor(s) may be operated at any suitable temperature. In some instances, it may be desirable to operate the reactor at relatively high temperatures. For example, the reactor may be operated at temperatures of at least about 300° C., at least about 400° C., at least about 500° C., at least about 600° C., at least about 700° C., at least about 800° C., at least about 900° C., or at least about 1000° C. In some embodiments, the reactor may be operated at temperatures between about 500° C. and about 1000° C., between about 525° C. and about 800° C., between about 550° C. and about 700° C., or between about 575° C. and about 650° C. In other embodiments, the reactor may be operated between about 500° C. and about 600° C. Not wishing to be bound by any theory, relatively high operating temperatures may affect the kinetics of the reactions in such a way that desired reaction products are formed and/or undesired product formation is inhibited or reduced.
The reactor(s) may also be operated at any suitable pressure. In some embodiments, the reactor may be operated at pressures of between about 1-4 atm. In some embodiments, the reactor may be operated at a pressure of at least about 1 atm, at least about 2 atm, at least about 3 atm, or at least about 4 atm.
The inventors have discovered that in certain embodiments, it is advantageous to heat the feed stream (e.g., a gaseous hydrocarbonaceous material, a solid hydrocarbonaceous material, a mixture of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a solid catalyst, etc.) at a relatively fast rate as it enters the reactor. High heating rates may be advantageous for a number of reasons. For instance, high heating rates may enhance the rate of mass transfer of the reactants from the bulk solid biomass to the catalytic reactant sites. This may, for example, facilitate introduction of volatile organic compounds formed during the pyrolysis of the hydrocarbonaceous material into the catalyst before completely thermally decomposing the hydrocarbonaceous material into generally undesired products (e.g., coke). In addition, high heating rates may reduce the amount of time the reactants are exposed to intermediate temperatures (i.e., temperatures between the temperature of the feed and the desired reaction temperature). Prolonged exposure of the reactants to intermediate temperatures may lead to the formation of undesirable products via undesirable decomposition and/or reaction pathways. Examples of suitable heating rates for heating the feed stream upon entering the reactor the feed stream include, for example, greater than about 50° C./s, greater than about 100° C./s, greater than about 200° C./s, greater than about 300° C./s, greater than about 400° C./s, greater than about 500° C./s, greater than about 600° C./s, greater than about 700° C./s, greater than about 800° C./s, greater than about 900° C./s, greater than about 1000° C./s, or greater. In some cases, the feed stream may be heated at a heating rate of between about 500° C./s and about 1000° C./s. In some embodiments, the heating rate for heating the feed stream upon entering the reactor may be between about 50° C./s and about 1000° C./s, or between about 50° C./s and about 400° C./s.
In some embodiments, the mass-normalized space velocity of the hydrocarbonaceous material may be selected to selectively produce a desired array of fluid hydrocarbon products. As used herein, the term “mass-normalized space velocity” is defined as the mass flow rate of the hydrocarbonaceous material into the reactor (e.g., as measured in g/hr) divided by the mass of catalyst in the reactor (e.g., as measured in g) and has units of inverse time. The mass-normalized space velocity of the hydrocarbonaceous material in a reactor may be calculated using different methods depending upon the type of reactor being used. For example, systems employing batch or semi-batch reactors, the hydrocarbonaceous material does not have a mass-normalized space velocity. For systems in which catalyst is fed to and/or extracted from the reactor during reaction (e.g., circulating fluidized bed reactors), the mass-normalized space velocity may be determined by calculating the average amount of catalyst within the volume of the reactor over a period of operation (e.g., steady-state operation).
Any suitable mass-normalized space velocity may be used in the embodiments described herein. In some instances, a mass-normalized space velocity of less than about 10 hour−1, less than about 5 hour−1, less than about 1 hour−1, less than about 0.5 hour-1, less than about 0.1 hour−1, less than about 0.05 hour−1, or less than about 0.01 hour−1 may be employed. In some embodiments, a mass-normalized space velocity of between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 10 hour−1, between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 5 hour−1, between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 0.1 hour−1, between about 0.1 hour−1 and about 1 hour−1, or between about 1 hour−1 and about 10 hour−1 may be employed. It may also be advantageous, in some embodiments, to employ mass-normalized space velocities of less than about 1 hour−1, less than about 0.5 hour−1, less than about 0.1 hour−1, less than about 0.05 hour−1, less than about 0.01 hour−1, between about 0.01 hour−1 and 0.1 hour−1, or between about 0.1 hour−1 and 1 hour−1 using a fluidized bed reactor.
Some embodiments comprise varying the mass-normalized space velocity of the hydrocarbonaceous material to selectively produce different fluid hydrocarbon products. For example, in some embodiments, varying the mass-normalized space velocity of the hydrocarbonaceous material may control the relative amounts of aromatic and olefin compounds in the reaction product. For example, relatively low mass-normalized space velocities may be used to produce a relatively larger amount of aromatics than olefins. Relatively high mass-normalized space velocities may be used to produce a relatively larger amount of olefins than aromatics. In some embodiments, solid hydrocarbonaceous material is provided in a fluidized bed reactor at a mass-normalized space velocity of between about 0.1 hour−1 and about 10 hour−1 to selectively produce olefin compounds, or between about 0.01 hour−1 and about 0.1 hour−1 to selectively produce aromatic compounds.
In some instances, it is beneficial to control the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material (e.g., a solid hydrocarbonaceous material) in the reactor and/or under a defined set of reaction conditions (i.e. conditions under which the hydrocarbonaceous material can undergo pyrolysis in a given reactor system). In continuous flow systems, the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor is defined as the amount of time the hydrocarbonaceous material and any reaction products formed therefrom (excluding products that accumulate in the reactor such as, for example, coke deposited on the catalyst) spend in the reactor. The residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in a reactor may be calculated using different methods depending upon the type of reactor being used. For example, in embodiments in which the reactor comprises a packed bed reactor into which only hydrocarbonaceous material is continuously fed (i.e. no carrier or fluidizing flow is utilized), the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor as used herein can be determined by the volume of the reactor divided by the volumetric flow rate of the product gases exiting the reactor. In cases where the reaction takes place in a reactor that is closed to the flow of mass during operation (e.g., a batch reactor), the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in such a reactor is defined as the amount of time elapsing between the time at which the temperature in the reactor containing the hydrocarbonaceous material reaches a level sufficient to commence a pyrolysis reaction (e.g. typically about 300° C. to about 1000° C. for many typical hydrocarbonaceous feed stock materials) and the time at which the reactor is quenched (e.g., cooled to a temperature below that sufficient to support further pyrolysis—e.g. typically about 300° C. to about 1000° C. for many typical hydrocarbonaceous feed stock materials).
In some cases, e.g. for certain fluidized bed reactors, the reactor feed stream(s) may include feed stream(s) comprising auxiliary materials (i.e., matter other than hydrocarbonaceous materials). For example, in certain cases where fluidized beds are used as reactors, the feed stream may comprise fluidization fluid(s). In cases where circulating fluidized beds are used, catalyst and fluidization fluid may both be fed/recycled to the reactor. In some cases, the auxiliary materials may comprise contaminants entrained in the hydrocarbonaceous material. In such cases, the residence time of the hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor can be determined as the volume of the reactor divided by the volumetric flow rate of the hydrocarbonaceous material and reaction product gases exiting the reactor as with the packed bed situation described above; however, since the flow rate of the hydrocarbonaceous material and reaction product gases exiting the reactor may not be convenient to determine directly, the volumetric flow rate of the hydrocarbonaceous material and reaction product gases exiting the reactor may be estimated by subtracting the feed volumetric flow rate of the auxiliary materials (e.g., fluidization fluid, catalyst, contaminants, etc.) into the reactor from the total volumetric flow rate of the gas stream(s) exiting the reactor.
In some embodiments, the residence time of a material (e.g., a hydrocarbonaceous material or any other suitable feed material) in the reactor is at least about 2 seconds, at least about 5 seconds, at least about 10 seconds, at least about 30 seconds, at least about 60 seconds, at least about 120 seconds, at least about 240 seconds, or at least about 480 seconds. In some cases, the residence time of a material (e.g., a hydrocarbonaceous material or any other suitable feed material) in the reactor is less than about 5 minutes, between about 1 minute and about 4 minutes, or from about 2 seconds to about 480 seconds. Previous “fast pyrolysis” studies have, in many cases, employed systems with very short feed material (e.g., hydrocarbonaceous material) residence times (e.g., less than 2 seconds). The inventors have discovered, however, that in some cases, the use of relatively longer residence times allows adequate time for additional chemical reactions to form desirable products. Long residence times can be achieved by, for example, increasing the volume of the reactor and/or reducing the volumetric flow rate of the hydrocarbonaceous materials. It should be understood, however, that in some embodiments described herein, the residence time of the feed material (e.g., hydrocarbonaceous material) may be relatively shorter, e.g., less than about 2 seconds or less than about 1 second.
In certain cases where fluidized bed reactors are used, the feed material (e.g., a solid hydrocarbonaceous material) in the reactor may be fluidized by flowing a fluid stream through the reactor. In the exemplary embodiment of
Suitable fluidization fluids that may be used in this invention include, for example, inert gases (e.g., helium, argon, neon, etc.), hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide, among others.
As shown in the illustrative embodiment of
The equipment required to achieve the separation and/or decoking steps can be readily designed by one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, in one set of the embodiments, the separator may comprise a vessel comprising a mesh material that defines a retaining portion and a permeate portion of the vessel. The mesh may serve to retain the catalyst within the retaining portion while allowing the reaction product to pass to the permeate portion. The catalyst may exit the separator through a port on the retaining side of the mesh while the reaction product may exit a port on the permeate side of the mesh. Other examples of separators and/or decokers are described in more detail in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Online), Vol. 11, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience, c2001-, pages 700-734; and C. D. Cooper and F. C. Alley. Air Pollution Control, A Design Approach. Second Ed. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, Inc. c1994, pages 127-149, incorporated herein by reference.
The separator may be operated at any suitable temperature. In some embodiments, the separator may be operated at elevated temperatures. The inventors have discovered that for certain reactions, the use of elevated temperatures in the separator can allow for additional reforming and/or reaction of the compounds from the reactor. This may allow for the increased formation of desirable products. Not wishing to be bound by any theory, elevated temperatures in the separator may provide enough energy to drive endothermic reforming reactions. The separator may be operated at a temperature of, for example, between about 25° C. and about 200° C., between about 200° C. and about 500° C., between about 500° C. and about 600° C., or between about 600° C. and about 800° C. In some cases, the separator may be operated at temperatures of at least about 500° C., at least about 600° C., at least 700° C., at least 800° C., or higher.
In some cases, it may be beneficial to control the residence time of the catalyst in the separator. The residence time of the catalyst in the separator is defined as the volume of the separator divided by the volumetric flow rate of the catalyst through the separator. In some cases, relatively long residence times of the catalyst in the separator may be desired in order to facilitate the removal of sufficient amounts of ash, coke, and/or other undesirable products from the catalyst. In addition, the inventors have discovered that by employing relatively long residence times of the catalyst in the separator, the pyrolysis products may be further reacted to produce desirable products. In some embodiments, the residence time and temperature in the separator are together selected such that a desired product stream is produced. In some embodiments, the residence time of the catalyst in the separator is at least about 1 second, at least about 5 seconds, at least about 10 seconds, at least about 30 seconds, at least about 60 seconds, at least about 120 seconds, at least about 240 seconds, at least about 300 seconds, at least about 600 seconds, or at least about 1200 seconds. Methods for controlling the residence time of the catalyst in the separator are known by those skilled in the art. For example, in some cases, the interior wall of the separator may comprise baffles that serve to restrict the flow of catalyst through the separator and/or increase the path length of fluid flow in the separator. Additionally or alternatively, the residence time of the catalyst in the separator may be controlled by controlling the flow rate of the catalyst through the separator (e.g., by controlling the flow rate of the fluidizing fluid through the reactor).
The separator may have any suitable size. For example, the separator may have a volume between 0.1-1 L, 1-50 L, 50-100 L, 100-250 L, 250-500 L, 500-1000 L, 1000-5000 L, 5000-10,000 L, or 10,000-50,000 L. In some instances, the separator has a volume greater than about 1 L, or in other instances, greater than about 10 L, 50 L, 100 L, 250 L, 500 L, 1,000 L, or 10,000 L. Separator volumes greater than 50,000 L are also possible. The separator may be cylindrical, spherical, or any other shape and may be circulating or non-circulating. In some embodiments, the separator may comprise a vessel or other unit operation similar to that used for one or more of the reactor(s) used in the process. The flow of the catalyst in the separator may comprise any suitable geometry. For example, the flow path may be substantially straight. In some cases, the separator may comprise a flow channel with a serpentine, meandering, helical, or any other suitable shape. The ratio of the length of the flow path of the separator (or, in certain embodiments, the path length of the catalyst through the separator) to the average diameter of the separator channel may comprise any suitable ratio. In some cases, the ratio may be at least 2:1, at least 5:1, at least 10:1, at least 50:1, at least 100:1, or greater.
The parameters outlined above may be used in any suitable combination to produce desirable reaction products (e.g., aromatic and/or olefin compounds) and/or favorable yields or particular components. For example, the use of long residence times may be combined with the use of a circulating or turbulent fluidized bed reactor to process solid hydrocarbonaceous material. In some embodiments, relatively high temperatures (e.g., at least 500° C.) and long residence times (e.g., at least about 1 second, at least about 5 seconds, at least about 10 seconds, at least about 30 seconds, at least about 60 seconds, at least about 120 seconds, at least about 240 seconds, at least about 300 seconds, at least about 600 seconds, or at least about 1200 seconds, etc.) may be used in the separator after pyrolyzing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material in the reactor. In other embodiments, relatively low mass-normalized space velocities (e.g., less than about 0.1 hour−1, less than about 0.05 hour−1, less than about 0.01 hour−1, etc.) may be used to produce a relatively larger amount of aromatics than olefins in a fluidized bed reactor, e.g., at least about 6% aromatics or more. Relatively high mass-normalized space velocities (e.g., at least about 0.1 hour−1, at least about 0.5 hour−1) may be used to produce a relatively larger amount of olefins than aromatics in a fluidized bed reactor, e.g., at least about 3 wt %, at least about 6 wt %, at least about 10 wt %, at least about 15 wt %, or at least about 20 wt % olefins). In another set of embodiments, a solid hydrocarbonaceous material and a zeolite catalyst comprising a large silica to alumina molar ratio (e.g., at least about 30) may be heated in a reactor at a high rate (e.g., greater than about 500° C./s). In some cases, a catalyst and a solid hydrocarbonaceous material may be fed to a reactor in a mass ratio of at least about 0.5:1 and heated to a temperature of, for example, between 500° C. and 1000° C. In some instances, a catalyst and a solid hydrocarbonaceous material may be fed to a reactor in a mass ratio of at least about 0.5:1 such that the mixture has a relatively long residence time (e.g., at least about 5 seconds). In yet another set of embodiments, a relatively high fluidization fluid residence time (e.g., at least about 5 seconds) and a relatively high reactor temperature (e.g., between about 500° C. and about 1000° C.) may be used.
As previously mentioned, the separator may not be required in all embodiments. For example, for situations in which catalytic fixed bed reactors are employed, the catalyst may be retained within the reactor, and the reaction products may exit the reactor substantially free of catalyst, thus negating the need for a separate separation step.
In the set of embodiments illustrated in
In one set of embodiments, an oxidizing agent is fed to the regenerator via a stream 38, e.g., as shown in
The regenerator may be of any suitable size mentioned above in connection with the reactor or the separator. In addition, the regenerator may be operated at elevated temperatures in some cases (e.g., at least about 300° C., 400° C., 500° C., 600° C., 700° C., 800° C., or higher). The residence time of the catalyst in the regenerator may also be controlled using methods known by those skilled in the art, including those outlined above. In some instances, the mass flow rate of the catalyst through the regenerator will be coupled to the flow rate(s) in the reactor and/or separator in order to preserve the mass balance in the system.
As shown in the illustrative embodiment of
Referring back to separator 32 in
The condenser may also, in some embodiments, make use of pressure change to condense portions of the product stream. In
Other products (e.g., excess gas) may be transported to optional compressor 26 via stream 56, where they may be compressed and used as fluidization gas in the reactor (stream 22) and/or where they may assist in transporting the hydro carbonaceous material to the reactor (streams 58). In some instances, the liquid fraction may be further processed, for example, to separate the water phase from the organic phase, to separate individual compounds, etc.
It should be understood that, while the set of embodiments described by
In some embodiments, a process of the invention may involve the use of more than one reactor. For instance, multiple reactors may be connected in fluid communication with each other, for example, to operate in series and/or in parallel, as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
In
One or more of the reactors in a multiple reactor configuration may comprise a fluidized bed reactor (e.g., a circulating fluidized bed reactor, a turbulent fluidized bed reactor, etc.) or, in other instances, any other type of reactor (e.g., any of the reactors mentioned above). For example, in one set of embodiments, the first reactor comprises a circulating fluidized bed reactor or a turbulent fluidized bed reactor, and the second reactor comprises a circulating fluidized bed reactor or a turbulent fluidized bed reactor in fluid communication with the first reactor. In addition, the multiple reactor configuration may include any of the additional processing steps and/or equipment mentioned herein (e.g., a separator, a regenerator, a condenser, etc.). The reactors and/or additional processing equipment may be operated using any of the processing parameters (e.g., temperatures, residence times, etc.) mentioned herein.
Hydrocarbonaceous material useful in the context of this invention may comprise, for example, a component such as xylitol, glucose (e.g., α-D-glucose, β-D-glucose), cellobiose, cellulose, hemi-cellulose, lignin, sugar cane bagasse, glucose, wood, and corn stover together with pyrolysis products thereof and combinations of such components and/or their pyrolysis products. Other examples of hydrocarbonaceous materials include, for example, plastic waste, recycled plastics, agricultural and municipal solid waste, food waste, animal waste, carbohydrates, lignocellulosic materials (e.g., wood chips or shavings, lignocellulosic biomass, etc.), or combinations thereof, among others.
As demonstrated herein, choice of hydrocarbonaceous and catalyst materials can be used to vary the composition of the resulting fluid hydrocarbon product. For instance, a wide range of hydrocarbonaceous materials (e.g., without limitation, glucose, cellulose, cellobiose, xylitol, etc.) can be used for production of naphthalenes. In another example, certain hydrocarbonaceous materials (e.g., cellulose) can be used for selective production of toluene. Alternatively, without limitation, where a hydrocarbonaceous material comprises glucose, adjusting a catalyst to glucose mass ratio of the feed composition can be used to vary production of identifiable, oxygenated compounds (e.g., oxygenated aromatic compounds). The catalyst to glucose mass ratio in the feed composition may be adjusted by increasing or decreasing the amount of catalyst fed to the reactor relative to the amount of glucose fed to the reactor. Some such and other compounds may be isolated as specialty chemicals for further reaction or incorporated into subsequent biofuel processing. In certain other embodiments, a hydrocarbonaceous material can comprise a lignin pyrolysis product such as, for example, benzyl phenyl ether. Pyrolysis of this and other compounds can be used to produce a range of aromatic compounds for use as fuel additives or commodity chemicals. Regardless of initial hydrocarbonaceous materials or resulting pyrolysis products, processes described herein can optionally include hydrogenation of various unsaturated or aromatic compounds to produce hydrogenation products that can be used as biofuels, or incorporated into biofuel production.
As described above, the hydrocarbonaceous material in the feed composition may comprise a solid, liquid, and/or gas. In cases where the hydrocarbonaceous material includes solids, the solids may be of any suitable size. In some cases, it may be advantageous to use hydrocarbonaceous solids with relatively small particle sizes. Small-particle solids may, in some instances, react more quickly than larger solids due to their relatively higher surface area to volume ratios compared to larger solids. In addition, small particle sizes may allow for more efficient heat transfer within each particle and/or within the reactor volume. This may prevent or reduce the formation of undesired reaction products. Moreover, small particle sizes may provide for increased solid-gas and solid-solid contact, leading to improved heat and mass transfer. In some embodiments, the average size of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material is less than about 5 mm, less than about 2 mm, less than about 1 mm, less than about 500 microns, less than about 60 mesh (250 microns), less than about 100 mesh (149 microns), less than about 140 mesh (105 microns), less than about 170 mesh (88 microns), less than about 200 mesh (74 microns), less than about 270 mesh (53 microns), or less than about 400 mesh (37 microns), or smaller.
In some cases, it may be desirable to employ feed material with an average particle size above a minimum amount in order to reduce the pressure required to pass the hydrocarbonaceous feed material through the reactor. For example, in some cases, it may be desirable to use solid hydrocarbonaceous material with an average particle size of at least about 400 mesh (37 microns), at least about 270 mesh (53 microns), at least about 200 mesh (74 microns), at least about 170 mesh (88 microns), at least about 140 mesh (105 microns), at least about 100 mesh (149 microns), at least about 60 mesh (250 microns), at least about 500 microns, a least about 1 mm, at least about 2 mm, at least about 5 mm, or higher.
Catalyst components useful in the context of this invention can be selected from any catalyst known in the art, or as would be understood by those skilled in the art made aware of this invention. Functionally, catalysts may be limited only by the capability of any such material to promote and/or effect dehydration, dehydrogenation, isomerization, hydrogen transfer, aromatization, decarbonylation, decarboxylation, aldol condensation and/or any other reaction or process associated with or related to the pyrolysis of a hydrocarbonaceous material. Catalyst components can be considered acidic, neutral or basic, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. Alternatively, alone or in conjunction with such and other considerations, catalysts can be selected according to pore size (e.g., mesoporous and pore sizes typically associated with zeolites), e.g., average pore sizes of less than about 100 Angstroms, less than about 50 Angstroms, less than about 20 Angstroms, less than about 10 Angstroms, less than about 5 Angstroms, or smaller. In some embodiments, catalysts with average pore sizes of from about 5 Angstroms to about 100 Angstroms may be used. In some embodiments, catalysts with average pore sizes of between about 5.5 Angstroms and about 6.5 Angstroms, or between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms may be used. In some cases, catalysts with average pore sizes of between about 7 Angstroms and about 8 Angstroms, or between about 7.2 Angstroms and about 7.8 Angstroms may be used.
As used herein, the term “pore size” is used to refer to the smallest cross-sectional diameter of a pore. The smallest cross-sectional diameter of a pore may correspond to the smallest cross-sectional dimension (e.g., a cross-sectional diameter) as measured perpendicularly to the length of the pore. In some embodiments, a catalyst with an “average pore size” or a “pore size distribution” of X refers to a catalyst in which the average of the smallest cross-sectional diameters of the pores within the catalyst is about X. It should be understood that “pore size” or “smallest cross sectional diameter” of a pore as used herein refers to the Norman radii adjusted pore size well known to those skilled in the art. Determination of Norman radii adjusted pore size is described, for example, in Cook, M.; Conner, W. C., “How big are the pores of zeolites?” Proceedings of the International Zeolite Conference, 12th, Baltimore, Jul. 5-10, 1998; (1999), 1, pp 409-414, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A list of exemplary Norman radii adjusted pore sizes are shown, for example, in
One of ordinary skill in the art will understand how to determine the pore size (e.g., minimum pore size, average of minimum pore sizes) in a catalyst. For example, x-ray diffraction (XRD) can be used to determine atomic coordinates. XRD techniques for the determination of pore size are described, for example, in Pecharsky, V. K. et al, “Fundamentals of Powder Diffraction and Structural Characterization of Materials,” Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Other techniques that may be useful in determining pore sizes (e.g., zeolite pore sizes) include, for example, helium pycnometry or low pressure argon adsorption techniques. These and other techniques are described in Magee, J. S. et al, “Fluid Catalytic Cracking: Science and Technology,” Elsevier Publishing Company, Jul. 1, 1993, pp. 185-195, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Pore sizes of mesoporous catalysts may be determined using, for example, nitrogen adsorption techniques, as described in Gregg, S. J. at al, “Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity,” 2nd Ed., Academic Press Inc., New York, 1982 and Rouquerol, F. et al, “Adsorption by powders and porous materials. Principles, Methodology and Applications,” Academic Press Inc., New York, 1998, both incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, pore sizes referred to herein are those determined by x-ray diffraction corrected as described above to reflect their Norman radii adjusted pore sizes.
In some embodiments, a screening method is used to select catalysts with appropriate pore sizes for the conversion of specific pyrolysis product molecules. The screening method may comprise determining the size of pyrolysis product molecules desired to be catalytically reacted (e.g., the molecule kinetic diameters of the pyrolysis product molecules). One of ordinary skill in the art can calculate, for example, the kinetic diameter of a given molecule. The type of catalyst may then be chosen such that the pores of the catalyst (e.g., Norman adjusted minimum radii) are sufficiently large to allow the pyrolysis product molecules to diffuse into and/or react with the catalyst. In some embodiments, the catalysts are chosen such that their pore sizes are sufficiently small to prevent entry and/or reaction of pyrolysis products whose reaction would be undesirable.
Without limitation, some such and other catalysts can be selected from naturally-occurring zeolites, synthetic zeolites and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the catalyst may be a ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. Optionally, such a catalyst can comprise acidic sites. Other types of zeolite catalysts include ferrierite, zeolite Y, zeolite beta, modernite, MCM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-57, SUZ-4, EU-1, ZSM-11, (S)AlPO-31, SSZ-23, among others. In other embodiments, non-zeolite catalysts may be used. For example, WOx/ZrO2, aluminum phosphates, etc. In some embodiments, the catalyst may comprise a metal and/or a metal oxide. Suitable metals and/or oxides include, for example, nickel, platinum, vanadium, palladium, manganese, cobalt, zinc, copper, chromium, gallium, and/or any of their oxides, among others. In addition, in some cases, properties of the catalysts (e.g., pore structure, type and/or number of acid sites, etc.) may be chosen to selectively produce a desired product.
It may be desirable, in some embodiments, to employ one or more catalysts to establish a bimodal distribution of pore sizes. In some cases, a single catalyst with a bimodal distribution of pore sizes may be used (e.g., a single catalyst that contains predominantly 5.9-6.3 Angstrom pores and 7-8 Angstrom pores). In other cases, a mixture of two or more catalysts may be employed to establish the bimodal distribution (e.g., a mixture of two catalysts, each catalyst type including a distinct range of average pore sizes). In some embodiments, one of the one or more catalysts comprises a zeolite catalyst and another of the one or more catalysts comprises a non-zeolite catalyst (e.g., a mesoporous catalyst, a metal oxide catalyst, etc.).
For example, in some embodiments at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% of the pores of the one or more catalysts (e.g., a zeolite catalyst, a mesoporous catalyst, etc.) have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within a first size distribution or a second size distribution. In some cases, at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within the first size distribution; and at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within the second size distribution. In some cases, the first and second size distributions are selected from the ranges provided above. In certain embodiments, the first and second size distributions are different from each other and do not overlap. An example of a non-overlapping range is 5.9-6.3 Angstroms and 6.9-8.0 Angstroms, and an example of an overlapping range is 5.9-6.3 Angstroms and 6.1-6.5 Angstroms. The first and second size distributions may be selected such that the range are not immediately adjacent one another, an example being pore sizes of 5.9-6.3 Angstroms and 6.9-8.0 Angstroms. An example of a range that is immediately adjacent one another is pore sizes of 5.9-6.3 Angstroms and 6.3-6.7 Angstroms.
As a specific example, in some embodiments one or more catalysts is used to provide a bimodal pore size distribution for the simultaneous production of aromatic and olefin compounds. That is, one pore size distribution may advantageously produce a relatively high amount of aromatic compounds, and the other pore size distribution may advantageously produce a relatively high amount of olefin compounds. In some embodiments, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms or between about 7 Angstroms and about 8 Angstroms. In addition, at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms; and at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 7 Angstroms and about 8 Angstroms.
In some embodiments, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms or between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms. In addition, at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms; and at least about 2%, at least about 5%, or at least about 10% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms.
In some embodiments, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% of the pores of the one or more catalysts have smallest cross-sectional diameters that lie within a first distribution and a second distribution, wherein the first distribution is between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms and the second distribution is different from and does not overlap with the first distribution. In some embodiments, the second pore size distribution may be between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms, between about 7 Angstroms and about 100 Angstroms, between about 7 Angstroms and about 50 Angstroms, or between about 100 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms. In some embodiments, the second catalyst may be mesoporous (e.g., have a pore size distribution of between about 2 nm and about 50 nm).
In some embodiments, the bimodal distribution of pore sizes may be beneficial in reacting two or more hydrocarbonaceous feed material components. For example, some embodiments comprise providing a solid hydrocarbonaceous material comprising a first component and a second component in a reactor, wherein the first and second components are different. Examples of compounds that may be used as first or second components include any of the hydrocarbonaceous materials described herein (e.g., sugar cane bagasse, glucose, wood, corn stover, cellulose, hemi-cellulose, lignin, or any others). For example, the first component may comprise one of cellulose, hemi-cellulose and lignin, and the second component comprises one of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The method may further comprise providing first and second catalysts in the reactor. In some embodiments, the first catalyst may have a first pore size distribution and the second catalyst may have a second pore size distribution, wherein the first and second pore size distributions are different and do not overlap. The first pore size distribution may be, for example, between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms. The second pore size distribution may be, for example, between about 7 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms, between about 7 Angstroms and about 100 Angstroms, between about 7 Angstroms and about 50 Angstroms, or between about 100 Angstroms and about 200 Angstroms. In some cases, the second catalyst may be mesoporous or non-porous.
The first catalyst may be selective for catalytically reacting the first component or a derivative thereof to produce a fluid hydrocarbon product. In addition, the second catalyst may be selective for catalytically reacting the second component or a derivative thereof to produce a fluid hydrocarbon product. The method may further comprise pyrolyzing within the reactor at least a portion of the hydrocarbonaceous material under reaction conditions sufficient to produce one or more pyrolysis products and catalytically reacting at least a portion of the pyrolysis products with the first and second catalysts to produce the one or more hydrocarbon products. In some instances, at least partially deactivated catalyst may also be produced.
In certain embodiments, a method used in combination with embodiments described herein includes increasing the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio of a composition to increase production of identifiable aromatic compounds. As illustrated herein, representing but one distinction over certain prior catalytic pyrolysis methods, articles and methods described herein can be used to produce discrete, identifiable aromatic, biofuel compounds selected from but not limited to benzene, toluene, propylbenzene, ethylbenzene, methylbenzene, methylethylbenzene, trimethylbenzene, xylenes, indanes, naphthalene, methylnaphthelene, dimethylnaphthalene, ethylnaphthalene, hydrindene, methylhydrindene, and dimethylhydrindene and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the reaction chemistry of a catalyst may be affected by adding one or more additional compounds. For example, the addition of a metal to a catalyst may result in a shift in selective formation of specific compounds (e.g., addition of metal to alumina-silicate catalysts may result in the production of more CO). In addition, when the fluidization fluid comprises hydrogen, the amount of coke formed on the catalyst may be decreased.
A catalyst used in embodiments described herein (e.g., in the feed stream, in the reactor, etc.) may be of any suitable size. In some cases, it may be advantageous to use relatively small catalyst particles. In some embodiments, for example, the use of small catalyst particles may increase the extent to which the hydrocarbonaceous material may contact the surface sites of the catalyst due to, for example, increased external catalytic surface area and decreased diffusion distances through the catalyst. In some cases, catalyst size may be chosen based at least in part on, for example, the type of fluid flow desired and the catalyst lifetime. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the catalyst may be less than about 5 mm, less than about 2 mm, less than about 1 mm, less than about 500 microns, less than about 60 mesh (250 microns), less than about 100 mesh (149 microns), less than about 140 mesh (105 microns), less than about 170 mesh (88 microns), less than about 200 mesh (74 microns), less than about 270 mesh (53 microns), or less than about 400 mesh (37 microns), or smaller.
In some embodiments, the catalyst may comprise both silica and alumina (e.g., a zeolite catalyst). The silica and alumina in the catalyst may be present in any suitable molar ratio. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to employ catalysts with a larger number of moles of silica relative to the number of moles of alumina (i.e., a high silica to alumina molar ratio). The inventors have unexpectedly discovered that high silica to alumina molar ratios, e.g., in combination with embodiments described herein, may result in the formation of a relatively large amount of aromatic product. For example, in some cases, the feed composition may comprise a silica to alumina molar ratio of at least about 30:1, at least about 40:1, at least about 50:1, at least about 75:1, at least about 100:1, at least about 150:1, or higher. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to employ a catalyst with a silica to alumina molar ratio of between about 30:1 and about 200:1, from about 30:1 to about 150:1, between about 50:1 and about 160:1, or between about 100:1 and about 150:1.
In some embodiments, catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material may be present in any suitable ratio. For example, the catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material may be present in any suitable mass ratio in cases where the feed composition (e.g., through one or more feed streams comprising catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material or through separate catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material feed streams), comprises catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material (e.g., circulating fluidized bed reactors). As another example, in cases where the reactor is initially loaded with a mixture of catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material (e.g., a batch reactor), the catalyst and hydrocarbonaceous material may be present in any suitable mass ratio. In some embodiments involving circulating fluidized bed reactors, the mass ratio of the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material in the feed stream—i.e., in a composition comprising a solid catalyst and a solid hydrocarbonaceous material provided to a reactor—may be at least about 0.5:1, at least about 1:1, at least about 2:1, at least about 5:1, at least about 10:1, at least about 15:1, at least about 20:1, or higher. In some embodiments involving circulating fluidized bed reactors, the mass ratio of the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material in the feed stream may be less than about 0.5:1, less than about 1:1, less than about 2:1, less than about 5:1, less than about 10:1, less than about 15:1, or less than about 20:1; or from about 0.5:1 to about 20:1, from about 1:1 to about 20:1, or from about 5:1 to about 20:1. Employing a relatively high catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio may facilitate introduction of the volatile organic compounds, formed from the pyrolysis of the feed material, into the catalyst before they thermally decompose to coke. Not wishing to be bound by any theory, this effect may be at least partially due to the presence of a stoichiometric excess of catalyst sites within the reactor.
In another aspect, a process product is described. In one set of embodiments, a product (e.g., a pyrolysis product) comprises a fluid composition comprising a portion of a reaction product of a solid hydrocarbonaceous material. Such products can be isolated for use as specialty chemicals (e.g., used as fuel directly or as high octane fuel additives) or, alternatively, hydrogenated for use as a biofuel. The products can also be further processed to make other useful compounds.
In some embodiments, the articles and methods described herein are configured to selectively produce aromatic compounds, e.g., in a single-stage, or alternatively, a multi-stage pyrolysis apparatus. A fluid hydrocarbon product may comprise, for example, an amount of aromatic compounds that comprises at least about 10 wt %, at least about 15 wt %, at least about 20 wt %, at least about 25 wt %, or at least about 30 wt % of the total reaction product of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material. In some cases, such amounts of aromatic compounds have an octane number greater than or equal to about 90, e.g., at least 92, 95, or 98. The amount of aromatic compounds that comprise a weight percentage of the total reaction product of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material is calculated as the weight of the aromatic compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by the weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products. As used herein, the term “aromatic compound” is used to refer to a hydrocarbon compound comprising one or more aromatic groups such as, for example, single aromatic ring systems (e.g., benzyl, phenyl, etc.) and fused polycyclic aromatic ring systems (e.g. naphthyl, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthyl, etc.). Examples of aromatic compounds include, but are not limited to, benzene, toluene, indane, indene, 2-ethyl toluene, 3-ethyl toluene, 4-ethyl toluene, trimethyl benzene (e.g., 1,3,5-trimethyl benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl benzene, etc.), ethylbenzene, methylbenzene, propylbenzene, xylenes (e.g., p-xylene, m-xylene, o-xylene, etc.), naphthalene, methyl-naphthalene (e.g., 1-methyl naphthalene, anthracene, 9,10-dimethylanthracene, pyrene, phenanthrene, dimethyl-naphthalene (e.g., 1,5-dimethylnaphthalene, 1,6-dimethylnaphthalene, 2,5-dimethylnaphthalene, etc.), ethyl-naphthalene, hydrindene, methyl-hydrindene, and dymethyl-hydrindene. Single ring and/or higher ring aromatics may be produced in some embodiments. The aromatic compounds may have carbon numbers from, for example, C5-C14, C6-C8, C6-C12, C8-C12, C10-C14.
In some embodiments, the articles and methods described herein are configured to selectively produce olefin compounds, e.g., in a single-stage, or alternatively, a multi-stage pyrolysis apparatus. A fluid composition (e.g., liquid and/or gaseous pyrolysis product) may comprise, for example, an amount of olefin compounds that includes at least about 3 wt %, at least about 7 wt %, at least about 10 wt %, at least about 12.5 wt %, at least about 15 wt %, at least about 20 wt % or more of the total reaction product of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material. The amount of olefin compounds that comprise a weight percentage of the total reaction product of the solid hydrocarbonaceous material is calculated as the weight of the olefin compounds present in the fluid hydrocarbon product divided by the weight of the hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis products. As used herein, the terms “olefin” or “olefin compound” (a.k.a. “alkenes”) are given their ordinary meaning in the art, and are used to refer to any unsaturated hydrocarbon containing one or more pairs of carbon atoms linked by a double bond. Olefins include both cyclic and acyclinc (aliphatic) olefins, in which the double bond is located between carbon atoms forming part of a cyclic (closed-ring) or of an open-chain grouping, respectively. In addition, olefins may include any suitable number of double bonds (e.g., monoolefins, diolefins, triolefins, etc.). Examples of olefin compounds include, but are not limited to, ethene, propene, butene, butadiene, and isoprene, among others. The olefin compounds may have carbon numbers from, for example, C2-C4, C2-C8, C4-C8, or C2-C12.
Process conditions may be chosen, in some cases, such that aromatic and/or olefin compounds are selectively produced, e.g., in a single-stage, or alternatively, a multi-stage pyrolysis apparatus. For example, in some embodiments, aromatic and/or olefin compounds may be selectively produced when the reactor is operated at a temperature of about 600° C. (or higher, in some instances). In addition, certain heating rates (e.g., at least about 50° C./s, or at least about 400° C./s), high catalyst-to-feed mass ratios (e.g., at least about 5:1), and/or high silica to alumina molar ratios in the catalyst (e.g., at least about 30:1) may be used to facilitate selective production of aromatic and/or olefin compounds. Some such and other process conditions may be combined with a particular reactor type, such as a fluidized bed reactor (e.g., a circulating fluidized bed reactor), to selectively produce aromatic and/or olefin compounds.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, the catalyst may be chosen to facilitate selective production of aromatic and/or olefin products. For example, ZSM-5 may, in some cases, preferentially produce relatively higher amounts of aromatic and/or olefin compounds. In some cases, catalysts that include Bronstead acid sites may facilitate selective production aromatic compounds. In addition, catalysts with well-ordered pore structures may facilitate selective production of aromatic compounds. For example, in some embodiments, catalysts with average pore diameters between about 5.9 Angstroms and about 6.3 Angstroms may be particularly useful in producing aromatic compounds. In addition, catalysts with average pore diameters between about 7 Angstroms and about 8 Angstroms may be useful in producing olefins. In some embodiments, a combination of one or more of the above process parameters may be employed to facilitate selective production of aromatic and/or olefin compounds. The ratio of aromatics to olefins produced may be, for example, between about 0.1:1 and about 10:1, between about 0.2:1 and about 5:1, between about 0.5:1 and about 2:1, between about 0.1:1 and about 0.5:1, between about 0.5:1 and about 1:1, between about 1:1 and about 5:1, or between about 5:1 and about 10:1.
In some embodiments, the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio in the feed is adjusted to produce desirable products and/or favorable yields. In some embodiments, oxygenated compounds may be produced, such as, for example, acetic acid, formic acid, hydroxyacetylaldehyde, furfural, 2-methyl furan, furan, 4-methyl furfural, furan-2-methanol, and levoglucosan, among others. For example, in some cases, increasing the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio may result in an increase in the production of non-cyclic carbonyl oxygenated compounds. As a specific example, as the catalyst to feed (e.g., glucose) mass ratio in the feed is increased but maintained below a mass ratio of about 9, the relative amount of non-cyclic carbonyl oxygenated products (e.g., hydroxyacetaldehyde, acetic acid, etc.) may be increased. In some cases, decreasing the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio may result in an increase in the production of cyclic oxygenated compounds. For example, in some cases, as the catalyst to feed (e.g., glucose) mass ratio in the feed is decreased (e.g., from about 19 to about 1), the relative amount of furan, furfural, methyl-furan, and/or 4-methyl furfural products is increased. In still further embodiments, as the catalyst to feed (e.g., glucose) mass ratio in the feed is decreased (e.g., from about 19 to about 2.3) the amount of furan-2-methanol product may be increased; and as the catalyst to feed (e.g., glucose) mass ratio in the feed is decreased further (e.g., from about 2.3 to about 1.5) the amount of furan-2-methanol product may be decreased. As such, the catalyst to hydrocarbonaceous material mass ratio may be, for example, at least about 0.5:1, at least about 1:1, at least about 2:1, at least about 5:1, at least about 10:1, at least about 15:1, at least about 20:1, or higher in some embodiments; or, less than about 0.5:1, less than about 1:1, less than about 2:1, less than about 5:1, less than about 10:1, less than about 15:1, or less than about 20:1 in other embodiments.
In some embodiments, the process product may also comprise a high-octane biofuel composition comprising a pyrolysis product of a hydrocarbonaceous biomass material. The pyrolysis product may be made using a single-stage pyrolysis apparatus, or alternatively, a multi-stage pyrolysis apparatus. In some cases, the hydrocarbonaceous material may be mixed with a catalyst (e.g., a zeolite catalyst) during the pyrolysis reaction. The composition may include, for example, discrete, identifiable aromatic compounds, one, more than one or each such compound characterized by an octane number greater than or equal to about 90, e.g., at least 92, 95, or 98. As distinguishable over some viscous tars and sludges of the prior art, such a biofuel composition can be characterized as soluble in petroleum-derived gasolines, diesel fuels and/or heating fuels. Such compounds can include, but are not limited to, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, methylethylbenzene, trimethylbenzene, xylenes, indanes naphthalene, methylnaphthelene, dimethylnaphthalene, ethylnaphthalene, hydrindene, methylhydrindene, and dimethylhydrindene and combinations thereof, the identity and/or relative amounts of which can vary depending upon choice of biomass composition, catalyst type, and/or any of the process parameters described herein.
In some embodiments, the process product may comprise a non-acidic biofuel compatible with existing gasoline and diesel fuel lines.
Furthermore, processes described herein may result in lower coke formation than certain existing methods. For example, in some embodiments, a pyrolysis product can be formed with less than about 30 wt %, less than about 25 wt %, less than about 20 wt %, than about 15 wt %, or less than about 10 wt % of the pyrolysis product being coke. The amount of coke formed is measured as the weight of coke formed in the system divided by the weight of hydrocarbonaceous material used in forming the pyrolysis product.
The following non-limiting examples and data are intended to illustrate various aspects and features relating the methods and/or compositions of this invention, including the selective production of various aromatic and/or oxygenated compounds (e.g., oxygenated hydrocarbons), as available through the pyrolytic methodologies described herein, but do not exemplify the full scope of the invention. In comparison with the prior art, the methods and compositions of this invention provide results and data which are surprising, unexpected, and contrary thereto. While the utility of this invention is illustrated through the use of several catalyst materials and hydrocarbonaceous sources, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that comparable results are obtainable with various other catalyst materials and/or hydrocarbonaceous sources, as are commensurate with the scope of this invention.
Representative of several embodiments, catalytic pyrolysis experiments described in Examples 1-9 below were conducted in a Pyroprobe 2000 batch pyrolysis reactor (CDS Analytical Inc.) with powdered catalyst and feed (<140 mesh size). Unless otherwise specified in this example, the reaction conditions for the experiments were: catalyst to feed weight ratio, 19; catalyst, ZSM5 (SiO2/Al2O3=30); nominal heating rate, 1000° C. s−1; reaction temperature, 600° C.; reaction time (residence time of feed), 240 s.
It should be noted that one of ordinary skill in the art will be able to convert between weight percentages and carbon yield. The amount of carbon in a carbonaceous material feed may be determined, for example, via chemical analysis. In addition, the carbon percentage of each of the reaction products may be calculated using their molecular formulas. For example, 1 mole of benzene (C6H6) contains about 72 grams of carbon and about 6 grams of hydrogen, resulting in a weight percentage of carbon of about 92.3%. Similarly, methyl-benzene contains about 91.5 wt % carbon, and ethyl-benzene and xylene contain about 90.5 wt % carbon, etc. By dividing the mass of carbon in a particular product stream by the mass of carbon in the feed, carbon percentages may be determined from weight percentages.
In one specific example, toluene may be produced from a wood feed. Chemical analysis may be used to determine that the wood that is fed to the system is 44% carbon by mass (i.e., 44% carbon in the feed). The toluene produced is 91.25% carbon by mass (i.e., 91.25% carbon in the product). For a carbon yield (C %) of 5%, the weight percentage may be calculated as:
Wt %=(5C%)*(44%)/(91.25%)=2.41 weight percent yield of toluene
For a mixture of products (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene and naphthalene) the sum of the individual product yields gives the total yield.
One of ordinary skill in the art will be able to determine the amount of carbon in a feed stream given available commercial technology. The feed composition or a hydrocarbonaceous material feed in terms of carbon and hydrogen percent can be determined, for example, by combustion analysis. In combustion analysis, a feed sample is weighed and subsequently burned in air (e.g., excess air) producing measurable combustion products such as carbon dioxide and water. The evolved carbon dioxide and water may be measured, for example, by trapping and weighing the gas or by gas chromatography. In this example, the moles of carbon dioxide (CO2) measured would be equivalent to the moles of carbon (C) in the feed sample. In addition, the moles of water (H2O) measured would be equal to ½ times the moles of hydrogen (H) in the feed sample.
When the reactor operates at steady-state, the mass exiting the reactor equals the mass fed to the reactor. In some instances, however, steady-state may not be achieved. For example, there may be accumulation of material (e.g., coke) within the reactor. In order to perform mass balance calculations, the amount of material that accumulates in the reactor must be determined. This can be accomplished, for example, by weighing the contents of the reactor before and after operation.
The aromatic distribution from catalytic pyrolysis of several representative biomass-derived oxygenates is shown in
As can be seen from
In addition to high heating rates, high mass ratios of catalyst to biomass can be utilized advantageously for aromatic production.
Proper catalyst selection can also be used to selectively produce aromatics.
Experiments were conducted using a model 2000 pyroprobe analytical pyroliser (CDS Analytical Inc.). The probe was a computer controlled resistively heated element which held an open ended quartz tube. Powdered samples were held in the tube with loose quartz wool packing; during pyrolysis, vapors flowed from the open ends of the quartz tube into a larger cavity (the pyrolysis interface) with a helium carrier gas stream. The carrier gas stream was routed to a model 5890 gas chromatograph interfaced with a Hewlett Packard model 5972A mass selective detector. The pyrolysis interface was held at 100° C. and the GC injector temperature used was 275° C. Helium was used as the inert pyrolysis gas as well as the carrier gas for the GCMS system. A 0.5 ml min−1 constant flow program was used for the GC capillary column. The GC oven was programmed with the following temperature regime: hold at 50° C. for 1 min, ramp to 200° C. at 10° C. min−1, hold at 200° C. for 15 min.
Powdered reactants were prepared by physically mixing the carbohydrate feed and the catalyst. Both the feed and the catalyst were sifted to <140 mesh before mixing. The physical mixtures of glucose tested were prepared with a D-glucose (Fisher) to HZSM-5 (Si/Al=30, WR Grace) mass ratio of 19, 9, 4, 2.3, and 1.5. Xyliol (Fisher)/ZSM-5, cellobiose (Acros)/ZSM-5, and cellulose (Whatnam)/ZSM-5 with a catalyst:feed mass ratio of 19 were also prepared. The HZSM-5 was calcined at 500° C. in air for 5 hours prior to reaction. Samples with a catalyst:glucose mass ratio of 19 were also prepared with the following catalysts: Silicalite, O-zeolite, Y-zeolite, and mesoporous SiO2/Al2O3 (SiO2/Al2O3=35). The reaction conditions, product yield, and product selectivities for all pyrolysis runs are summarized in Table 1. All runs were performed with a reaction temperature of 600° C. The yields are reported in terms of molar carbon yield where the moles of carbon in the product are divided by the moles of carbon in the reactant. The aromatic yields were calculated by dividing the moles of carbon in the aromatic product(s) by moles of carbon in the feed.
[a]Coke yield was estimated by mass balance
In accordance with results summarized above, xylitol and xylose can be converted into thermally stable compounds by catalytic pyrolysis without significant coke formation (see Table 2). Catalyst addition to the pyrolysis process significantly decreases coke formation and increases the conversion to thermally stable products. Five different catalysts were tested for catalytic pyrolysis of xylitol including: silica alumina (SiO2—Al2O3 Grace-Davison 3125), tungstated-zirconium (WOx/ZrO2 MEI X201251), sulfated-zirconium (SOx/ZrO2 MEI X20880), Pt-silica-alumina (Pt/SiO2—Al2O3 prepared according to Huber et al) and ZSM-5 (silica to alumina molar ratio of 35 WR Grace). The catalyst structure greatly changes the product selectivity, and high yields (50%) of aromatic compounds (which could be used as gasoline fuel additives) can be produced with a ZSM-5 catalyst. The system employed detects thermally stable products versus thermally unstable compounds which decompose under GC conditions. Notably, xylose produces furfural with a higher selectivity (55%) than when xylitol is the feed.
Table 2 outlines the results for catalytic pyrolysis of xylitol in the pyroprobe-GCMS system. The reaction conditions for these experiments were as follows: Temperature, 600° C.; Ramping Rate, 1000° C./s; Reaction Time, 60 s, Xylitol to Catalyst Weight Ratio, 0.18; Xylitol added to catalyst as a physical mixture ground to Mesh Size between 60-120; Inert gas, 1 atm of He unless otherwise noted.
[1] 1.08 mg of xylitol were used for this experiment. Xylitol was ground to mesh size of between 60-120.
[2] Xylose was the feed for this experiment
[3] This experiment was done in an atmosphere of hydrogen to see the effect of hydrogen.
[4] Conversion based on weight change.
[5] This conversion only reports the thermally stable compounds defined as products that can be analyzed with our current GCMS system.
[6] The selectivity is on a per carbon basis and only includes thermally stable compounds identified with GCMS.
[7] The aromatic products include: Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylenes, Naphthalene, Methyl-Naphthalene, Dimethyl-Naphthalene, Ethyl-Naphthalene, Hydrindene, Methyl-Hydrindene, and Dymethyl-Hydrindene.
Metal addition to silica-alumina shifted the selectivity towards CO, showing that metals can influence the reaction chemistry. Such results suggest that by adding different amounts of metal to the catalysts the rate of hydrogen producing reactions and hydrogen transfer reactions can be increased. Catalytic hydropyrolysis (catalytic pyrolysis with hydrogen rather than He) decreased coke formation on the catalyst, illustrating yet another embodiment. These preliminary positive results show that catalytic pyrolysis can produce a range of products including aromatics which could be used as a gasoline or jet fuel blend. This aromatic blend can be produced from a variety of feedstocks over the ZSM-5 catalyst with similar product selectivity. (See, e.g.,
Lignin and lignin-derived compounds can also be converted into fluid aromatic compounds by catalytic pyrolysis, in accordance with this invention (Tables 3 and 4). Pyrolysis of organosolv lignin primarily produces benzyl phenyl ether (BPE), ethanol, methanol, CO and CO2. Catalyst pyrolysis increases the conversion to thermally stable products by 3 to 10 times (compared to pyrolysis without catalysts) with SiO2—Al2O3 and ZSM-5 respectively. Organosolv lignin is a lignin product from the organosolv pulping process, and similar results can be anticipated from other solid compounds comprising lignin. These experiments show how catalysts can significantly change the products and reactivity of lignin-derived feeds in the pyrolysis process. A major product formed from organosolv lignin is BPE, and Table 3 shows results for catalytic pyrolysis of BPE: Benzene, phenol, toluene and other aromatic compounds. The catalytic pyrolysis process can be modified to produce benzene, phenol, toluene and other aromatic compounds directly from solid lignin streams. Benzene and Toluene can be added directly in gasoline, whereas phenol is a valuable commodity chemical.
Table 3 outlines the results from the catalytic pyrolysis of organosolv lignin (Aldrich) in the pyroprobe-GCMS system. The reaction conditions were as follows: Temperature, 600° C.; Ramping Rate, 1000° C./s; Reaction Time, 60 s; Lignin to Catalyst Weight Ratio, 0.18; Lignin added to catalyst as a physical mixture ground to Mesh Size between 60-120; Inert gas, 1 atm of He.
[1] Conversion based on thermally stable compounds only.
[2] Xylene includes meta- and para-xylene.
[3] Other products observed in low selectivity, but not reported here include diphenylmethane, 1,2-diphenylethane, guaiacol, acetic acid, furfuraldehyde and toluene.
Table 4 outlines the results from the catalytic pyrolysis of benzyl-phenyl ether (BPE) in the Pyroprobe-GCMS system. The reaction conditions were as follows: Temperature, 600° C.; Ramping Rate, 1000° C./s; Reaction Time, 60 s; Lignin to Catalyst Weight Ratio, 0.18; Lignin added to catalyst as a physical mixture ground to Mesh Size between 60-120; Inert gas, 1 atin of He.
[1] Conversion is based on thermally stable compounds only.
[2] Methyl phenol includes (2, 3 and 4)-methylphenols
[3] Other products with low selectivity include benzyl alcohol and benzaldehyde.
In accordance with certain embodiments and by comparison with the prior art, biomass was pyrolysed to condensable vapors which were converted over the catalyst (in situ) at the same temperature in the same reaction chamber. A second stage, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,241,323 and 5,504,259, was eliminated from the process. The benefit of a one stage process is two fold: less energy is used than when the fluid product is condensed and later upgraded (all chemistry happens at the same temperature), and the condensable vapors do not have the chance to polymerize or otherwise degrade during the transfer to a second upgrading stage.
In general, fluid fuel product compositions of the prior art are not specified. While the literature reports lowered oxygen content, it does not disclose specific molecular fuel components. Illustrating a range of embodiments of the type described herein, a ZSM-5 catalyst in a fixed bed reactor produced a fluid consisting almost entirely of aromatic compounds. Oxygen was removed from the biomass in the form of water, CO, and CO2. Specifically, aromatics quantified in the fuel included: benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethyl-benzene, ethyl-methyl-benzene, trimethyl-benzene, indane, methyl-indane, naphthalene, methyl-naphthalene, and dimethyl-naphthalene. Such a mix of aromatics could be used as a high octane fuel additive. All of the aromatics are above 100 octane with the exception of naphthalene (90 octane). See Table 5, below.
As demonstrated above, high quality aromatic fuel/additives can be produced directly from solid biomass feedstocks by catalytic pyrolysis in a single catalytic reactor at short residence times. Through an understanding of the reaction chemistry, catalyst, and apparatus/reactor design, catalytic pyrolysis can be used to efficiently generate fluid biofuels from a range of lignocellulosic biomass resources.
The effect of varying the silica to alumina molar ratio of the catalyst was also investigated. The conditions for these experiments were as follows: catalyst to feed mass ratio, 19; catalyst, ZSM5; nominal heating rate, 1000° C. s−1; reaction temperature, 600° C.; reaction time (residence time of feed), 240 s. Glucose was used as the hydro carbonaceous feed for these experiments.
This example illustrates the effect of metal impregnation in the catalyst on product yields. Impregnation of ZSM-5 (silica to alumina molar ratio of 30, Zeolyst) pores with metals shifted the product selectivity toward CO and CO2, showing that metals can influence the reaction chemistry. Not wishing to be bound by any theory, the metals may increase decarbonylation and/or decarboxylation reaction rates. The following metals were tested: Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, Ga, and Pt. Table 6 summarizes the results obtained for the catalytic pyrolysis of glucose on metal incorporated ZSM-5 in the pyroprobe-GCMS system. Two different methods were employed for metal addition to ZSM-5: wet impregnation and ion exchange. Catalysts impregnated using the ion exchange method produced higher yields of aromatics and lower yields of coke compared to catalysts impregnated using the wet impregnation method.
Catalyst pore sizes also affected aromatic yield. Table 7 includes carbon yield data from the catalytic pyrolysis of glucose over several different frameworks of zeolites. Not wishing to be bound by any theory, it may be desirable to use zeolite catalysts with pore sizes large enough to allow the diffusion of oxygenated intermediate molecules (e.g., methyl furfural, which has kinetic diameter of 5.9 Angstroms) into the zeolite framework. It may also be desirable to use zeolite catalysts with pore sizes sufficiently small to selectively produce aromatics (<6.3 Angstroms). Table 7 shows that ZK-5 produced no aromatics while Y-zeolite produced primarily coke. Catalysts with pore sizes closest to that of ZSM-5 (5.6 Å) produced the most aromatic yield.
The density and strength of acid sites in the catalysts also had an effect on aromatic production.
Naturally occurring biomass was also used as a feedstock in some experiments to produce fluid aromatics by catalytic pyrolysis. Table 8 outlines the results for catalytic pyrolysis of naturally occurring biomass in the pyroprobe-GCMS system. Pyrolysis of wood, sugarcane (Brazil and Hawaii) and corn stover over ZSM-5 (Si/Al=60 WR Grace) produced aromatics, CO and CO2. The aromatic yields produced using these feedstocks were comparable to that of glucose and cellulose. Such results suggest that catalytic pyrolysis can be used with naturally occurring biomass feedstocks.
This example describes the use of a fixed bed, flow reactor system. In this example, a 0.5-inch diameter quartz tubular reactor (approximately 2 inches long) was used. The reactor was loaded with 50 mg of ZSM-5 catalyst (ZEOLYST, CBV 3024E, SiO2/Al2O3=30) to produce a fixed bed, which was supported by quartz wool and quartz beads. The quartz reactor was held in a temperature-controlled furnace (furnace: Lindberg, 55035A; temperature controller: Omega, CN96211TR) at 600° C. The temperature of the reactor was monitored by a thermocouple inserted through a quartz inner tube to the top surface of the packed bed.
The feedstock for this example was furan (Sigma-Aldrich, 99%). During operation, helium (ultra high purity, Airgas) was used as a carrier gas, and its flow rate was controlled by a mass flow controller (controller: Brooks, SLA5850S1BAB1-C2A1; controlling box: Brooks, 0154CFD2B31A). Liquid feedstock (furan) was introduced into the carrier gas by a syringe pump (KD Scientific, KDS 100) and was quickly vaporized. The vaporized feed was transported to the reactor. The temperature of the reactor was 600° C., under a He atmosphere with a furan partial pressure 5.7 torr.
Products flowed from the reactor to a condenser placed in a dry ice-acetone bath. The condenser was maintained at a temperature of around −55° C. and was used to condense products with relatively high boiling points. Gas products were collected in gas-sampling bags. Liquid and gas products were analyzed using GC-FID (Shimadzu 2010).
The amount of carbon on the catalyst was determined during catalyst regeneration. During regeneration, CO was converted to CO2 by a copper converter. The CO2 was trapped by ascarite (Sigma-Aldrich, 5-20 mesh). The amount of carbon on the partially deactivated catalyst was calculated by measuring the weight change of the CO2 trap.
As shown in
In this example, a fluidized bed was used to convert solid biomass to hydrocarbons.
The catalyst was fluidized during operation of the reactor via a helium gas stream controlled by a mass flow controller. The fluidization gas flow rate was 1200 mL min−1 at SATP. Solid biomass feedstocks of wood were injected by a stainless steel auger into the side of the reactor from a sealed feed hopper. The feed rate of the wood was 6 g hr−1, yielding a mass-normalized space velocity of 0.07 hr−1. To maintain an inert environment in the reactor, the hopper was swept with helium at a rate of 200 mL min−1. Both the reactor and the fluidization gas were resistively heated to reaction temperature of 600° C.
During operation, product gases exited the top of the reactor and passed through a cyclone, operated at 450° C., where entrained solids were removed and collected. The vapor then passed through a condenser train. The first three condensers were operated at 0° C. in an ice bath, and the following three condensers were operated at −55° C. in a dry ice/acetone bath. The non-condensed vapors exiting the condenser train were collected in a tedlar gas sampling bag for GC/MS and GC/FID analysis. Liquids collected in the condensers were quantitatively removed after reaction with ethanol and analyzed with GC/MS and GC/FID.
The aromatic yields for the pyrolysis of wood with ZSM-5 catalyst in the fluidized bed reactor system are shown in
The selectivity for olefins and aromatics was adjusted by varying the mass-normalized space velocity of the biomass. Two different space velocities were tested in the fluidized bed reactor at a reactor temperature of 600° C. 30 g and 90 g charges of catalyst were used for the high and low biomass space velocity runs, respectively. Dry pine wood (80-120 mesh) feed was fed at 30 g hr−1 and 6 g hr−1 for the high and low biomass space velocity runs, respectively. The fluidization gas temperature was 600° C., with a fluidization gas flow rate of 12 mL min−1 at SATP. The cyclone temperature was 450° C., and a ZSM-5 catalyst was used. As seen in
While several embodiments of this invention have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the functions and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of this invention. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the teachings of this invention is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. This invention is directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of this invention.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
This is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/397,303, filed Mar. 3, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,277,643 B2, issued Oct. 2, 2012). The disclosure in this prior application is incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/068,001, filed Mar. 4, 2008, entitled “Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Solid Biomass and Related Biofuels and Aromatic Compounds,” by Huber, et al. and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/098,284, filed Sep. 19, 2008, entitled “Catalytic Pyrolysis of Solid Biomass and Related Biofuels and Aromatic Compounds,” by Huber, et al., incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Grant No. 747996 awarded by the National Science Foundation.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3931349 | Kuo | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3936353 | Chen | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3998898 | Chang et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4035430 | Dwyer et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4058576 | Chang et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4300009 | Haag et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4483764 | Hensley et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4503278 | Chen et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4549031 | Chen et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4687654 | Taramasso et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4933283 | Chen et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4948495 | Coburn | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5502259 | Zakoshansky et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 6359186 | Hotier et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6369287 | Magne-Drisch | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6429346 | Hotier et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6495723 | DeVera et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6605194 | Raghavan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6814940 | Hiltunen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 20080228021 | Joensen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312483 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090090046 | O'Connor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165378 | Agblevor | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 852 491 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 1 892 280 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 07256228 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 2001316517 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2003050008 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2004-339360 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2007-153925 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007153925 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 10-2006-0102778 | Sep 2006 | KR |
| 9410107 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 2007064014 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007128799 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008009643 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008006904 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008009644 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008020047 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008020047 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008101949 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009018531 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Valle, B. et al. (2005). Catalysis Today, 106, 118-122. |
| French, R. et al (2010). Fuel Processing Technology, 91, 25-32. |
| Morris, M.A. (2011). “Production of bio-oils via catalytic pyrolysis” in Handbook of Biofuels Production: Processes and Technologies, edited by R.C. Luque & J. Juan Clark, Woodhead Publishing, 688 pgs [Office action cites pages in chapter 14]. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2009/001382, mailed Oct. 26, 2009. |
| Huber, “Career: Selective Thermal Processing of Biomass-derived Oxygenates by Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis”, NSF Grant Proposal, Submitted to NSF in Aug. 2007, Funded with a start date of Feb. 1, 2008. |
| Huber, et al, “Acquisition of Instrumentation for a Biofuels Research Laboratory”, Proposal to the NSF, NSF 07-510, Funding started on Sep. 1, 2007. |
| Huber, G., “Money Doesn't Grow on Trees, But Gasoline Might”, Press Release 08-056, NSF Web Site, Apr. 7, 2008, www.nsf.gov/news/news—summ.jsp?cntn—id=111392. |
| Adam, J. at al., “In situ catalytic upgrading of biomass derived fast pyrolysis vapours in a fixed bed reactor using mesoporous materials,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2006, 96, 93-101. |
| Aho, A., “Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor: influence of the acidity of H-beta zeolite,” IChemE, 2007, 85 (B5), 473-480. |
| Aho, A. et al., “Catalytic pyrolysis of woody biomass in a fluidized bed reactor. Influence of the zeolite structure,” Fuel, Published online Mar. 14, 2008,1-9. |
| Alferov, V. et al., “Catalytic activity of natural and synthetic zeolites . . . ,” 2006, 6, 42-46. |
| Antal, Jr. M., “Effects of Reactor Severity on the Gas-Phase Pyrolysis of Celulose and Kraft Lignin-Derived Volatile Matter,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1983, 22, 366-375. |
| Antal, Jr., M. et al., “Cellulose Pyrolysis Kinetics: The Current State of Knowledge,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 703-717. |
| Antonakou, E. et al., “Evaluation of various typos of A1-MCM-41 materials in catalysts in biomass pyrolysis for the production of bio-fuels and chemicals,” Fuel, 2006, 85, 2202-2212. |
| Ates, F. et al., “Catalytic pyrolysis of perennial shrub, Euphorbia rigida in the water vapour atmosphere,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2005, 73, 299-304. |
| Atutxa, A. et al., “Kinetic Description of the Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass in a Conical Spouted Bed Reactor,” Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19, 765-774. |
| Bagri, R. et al., “Catalytic pyrolysis of polyethylene,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2002, 63, 29-41. |
| Balat, M., “Mechanisms of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes, Part 1: Reactions of Pyrolysis,” Energy Sources, 2008, 30 (Part A), 620-635. |
| Balat, M., “Mechanisms of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes. Part 2: Reactions of Gasification,” Energy Sources, 2008, 30 (Part A), 636-648. |
| Bauer, F., “Mechanistic and tracer-kinetic studies on methanol conversion on HZSM-5 catalysts,” ISOOCLC, 1990, 3-190. |
| Bauer, F. et al., “TG-FRIR and isotopic studies on coke formation during the MTG process,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 1999, 29, 109-115. |
| Bertarione, S. et al., “Furfuryl Alcohol Polymerization in H-Y Confined Spaces: Reaction Mechanism and Structure of Carbocationic Intermediates,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 2580-2589. |
| Bilba, K. et al., “Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of thermal degradation of sugar cane bagasse,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1996, 38, 61-73. |
| Blazso, M., “In situ modification of pyrolysis products of macromolecules in an analytical pyrolyser,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2005, 74, 344-352. |
| Blommel, P. et al., “Production of Conventional Liquid Fuels from Sugars,” http://www.virent.com/BioForming/Virent—Technology—Whitepaper.pdf., Published online Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Boateng, A., “Characterization and Thermal Conversion of Charcoal Derived from Fluidized-Bed Fast Pyrolysis Oil Production of Switchgrass,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46, 8857-8862. |
| Boateng, A. et al., “Bench-Scale Fluidized-Bed Pyrolysis of Switchgrass for Bio-Oil Production,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46, 1891-1897. |
| Boon, J. et al., “Structural Studies on Cellulose Pyrolysis and Cellulose Chars by PYMS, PYGCMS, FTIR, NMR and by Wed Chemical Techniques,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 1994, 7 (1-6), 25-32. |
| Bridgwater A., “Fast pyrolysis of biomass: technical requirements for commercialization,” Proceedings of an Expert Meeting, Strasbourg, France, 2002, vol. 2003, pp. 33-40. |
| Bridgwater, A., “Production of high grade fuels and chemicals from catalytic pyrolysis of biomass,” Catalysis Today, 1996, 29, 285-295. |
| Bridgwater, A. et al., “Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2000, 4, 1-73. |
| Bridgwater, A. et al., “Production Costs of Liquid Fuels From Biomass,” International Journal of Energy Research, 1994, 18, 79-95. |
| Cao, Q., “Influence of co-pyrolysis and catalysis of biomass with waste tire on pyrolytic oil properties,” Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2007, 50 (5), 1283-1289. |
| Carlson, T. et al., “Aromatic Production from Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass-Derived Feedstocks,” Top Catal, 2009, 52, 241-252. |
| Carlson, T. et al., “Green Gasoline by Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Solid Biomass Derived Compounds,” ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 397-400. |
| Carlson, T. et al., “Mechanistic Insights from Isotopic Studies of Glucose Conversion to Aromatics Over ZSM-5,” ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 107-110. |
| Casu, B. et al., “Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange of Glucose and Polyglucoses in Dimethyl Sulphoxide Solution,” Solution Properties of Natural Polymers, Special Publication—Chemical Society, 1968, 217-226. |
| Chen, G. et al., “The Mathematical Modeling of Biomass Pyrolysis in a Fixed Bed and Experimental Verification,” Section of Thermal Power Engineering, Department of Medical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology, 2001, 2, 1158-1170. |
| Chen, N.Y. et al., “Fluidized-Bed Upgrading of Wood Pyrolysis Liquids and Related Compounds,” ACS Symposium Series, 1988, 376, 277-288. |
| Chen, N.Y. et al., “Liquid Fuel from Carbohydrates,” Chemtech, 1986, 508-511. |
| Copeland, D., http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2009/07/13/the—greening—of—gasoline/. Published Jul. 13, 2009. |
| Corma, A. et. al., “Processing biomass-derived oxygenates in the oil refinery : Catalytic cracking (FCC) reaction pathways and role of catalyst,” J. Catalysis, 2007, 247(2), 307-32. |
| Czernik, S. et al., “Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil,” Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18, 590-598. |
| Dao, L.H. et al., “Direct Catalytic Thermoconversion of Biomass into Liquid Fuels and Chemical Feedstocks,” Proceedings of the Fifth Canadian Bioenergy R&D Seminar, 1984, 460(4), pp. 460-464. |
| Dao, L.H. et al., “Reactions of Biomass Pyrolysis Oils Over ZSM-5 Zeolite Catalysts,” Proceedings of National Meeting of American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Denver, CO, 1987, 32:2, 308-316. |
| Dao, L.H. et al., “Reactions of Model Compounds of Biomass-Pyrolysis Oils over ZSM-5 Zeolite Catalysts,” American Chemical Society, ACS Symposium Series, 1988, 376, 328-341. |
| Degnan, T.F. et al., “History of ZSM-5 fluid catalytic cracking additive development at Mobil,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2000, 35-36, 245-252. |
| Demirbas, A., “Conversion of Biomass to a Pyrolytic Oil for Blending Gasoline as an Alternative Fuel in Internal Combustion Engines,” Energy Sources, 2001, 23, 553-562. |
| Demirbas, A., “Production of Gasoline and Diesel Fuels from Bio-materials,” Energy Sources, Part A, 2007, 29, 753-760. |
| Diebold, J. et al., “Biomass to Gasoline (BTG): Upgrading Pyrolysis Vapors to Aromatic Gasoline with Zeolite Catalysis at Atmospheric Pressure,” Proceedings of National Meeting of American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Denver, CO, 1987, 32:2, 297-307. |
| Dozeman, G. et al., “Production of Liquid Chemicals and Fuels From Cellulosics by Catalytic Conversion of Intermediate Sugars,” Energy of Biomass and Wastes, 1991, 1063-1089. |
| Elordi, G. et al., “Catalytic Pyrolysis of High Density Polyethylene in a Conical Spouted Bed Reactor,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2007, 79, 450-455. |
| Elordi, G. et al., “Catalytic Pyrolysis of High Density Polyethylene on a HZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst in a Conical Spounted Bed Reactor,” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2007, 5, Article A72, 1-9. |
| Encinar, J. et al., “Catalyzed Pyrolysis of Grape and Olive Bagasse. Influence of Catalyst Type and Chemical Treatment,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1997, 36, 4176-4183. |
| Evans, R. et al., “Molecular-Beam, Mass-Spectrometric Studies of Wood Vapor and Model Compounds over HZSM-5 Catalyst,” Proceedings of National Meeting of American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Denver, CO, 1987, 32:2, 287-296. |
| Fabbri, D. et al., “Effect of zeolites and nanopowder metal oxides on the distribution of chiral anhydrosugars evolved from pyrolysis of cellulose: An analytical study,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2007, 80, 24-29. |
| Fan, Y. et al., “Acidity Adjustment of HZSM-5 Zeolites by Dealumination and Realumination with Steaming and Citric Acid Treatments,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 15411-15416. |
| Froment, G., “Coke Formation in Catalytic Processes: Kinetics and Catalyst Deactivation,” Catalyst Deactivation, Edited by C. Bartholomew et al., 1997, 53-68. |
| Gayubo, A.G. et al., “Deactivation of a HZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst in the Transformation of the Aqueous Fraction of Biomass Pyrolysis Oil into Hydrocarbons,” Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18, 1640-1647. |
| Gayubo, A.G. et al., “Transformation of Oxygenate Components of Biomass Pyrolysis Oil on a HZSM-5 Zeolite. II. Aldehydes, Ketones, and Acids,” Ind. Eng. Hem. Res., 2004, 43, 2619-2626. |
| Gayubo, A.G. et al., “Undesired Components in the Transformation of Biomass Pyrolysis Oil into Hydrocarbons on an HZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst,” J. Chem Technol. Biotechnol, 2005, 80, 1244-1251. |
| Gonzalez-Tetera, M.J., et al. “Polyfuran Conducting Polymers: Synthesis, properties, and applications,” Synthetic Metals 2008, 158 165-189. |
| Goyal, H.B. et al., “Bio-fuels from Thermochemical Conversion of Renewable Resources: A Review,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12, 504-517. |
| Grandmaison, J. et al., “Conversion of Furanic Compounds over H-ZSM-5 Zeolite,” Fuel, 1999, 69, 1058-1061. |
| Gullu, D. “Effect of Catalyst on Yield of Liquid Products from Biomass via Pyrolysis,” Energy Sources, 2003, 25, 753-765. |
| Gutierrez-Alejandre, A. et al., “FT-IR evidence of the interaction of benzothiophene with the hydroxyl groups of H-MFI and H-MOR zeolites,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2006, 41, 42-47. |
| Halpern, Y. et al., “Levoglucosenone (1,6-Anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-Δ'-βD-Pyranonsen-2-one). A Major Product of the Acid-Catalyzed Pyrolysis of Cellulose and Related Carbohydrates,” J. Org. Chem., 1973, 38 (2), 204-209. |
| Hanniff, I.M. et al., “Conversion of Biomass Carbohydrates into Hydrocarbon Products,” Energy from Biomass and Wastes, 1987, 10, 831-843. |
| Herring, A.H. et al., “Separating Gas Phase from Solid Phase Chemistry and Identifying the Reactive Intermediates Involved in the Pyrolysis of Biomass Chars.,” Prepr. Pap. Am. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem 2005, 50 (1), 161-162. |
| Horne, P.A. et al., “Catalytic Coprocessing of Biomass-derived Pyrolysis Vapours and Methanol,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1995, 34, 87-108. |
| Horne, P.A. et al., “Premium Quality Fuels and Chemicals from the Fluidised Bed Pyrolysis of Biomass with Zeolite Catalyst Upgrading,” Renewable Energy, 1994, 5, Part II, 810-812. |
| Horne, P.A. et al., “Reaction of Oxygenated Biomass Pyrolysis Model Compounds over a ZSM-5 Catalyst,” Renewable Energy, 1996, 7 (2), 131-144. |
| Iliopoulou, E.F. et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Biomass Pyrolysis Products by Mesoporous Materials: Effect of Steam Stability and Acidity of A1-MCM-41 Catalysts,” Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 134, 51-57. |
| Islam, M.N. et al., “Techno-economics of Rice Husk Pyrolysis, Conversion with Catalytic Treatment to Produce Liquid Fuel,” Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73, 67-75. |
| Janssen, F., “Catalysis for Renewable Energy and Chemicals, The Thermal Conversion of Biomass,” Chapter 2: Environmental Catalysis, Edited by F. Janssen et al., Conversion of Imperial College Press, 1999, 15-36. |
| Karge, H.G. et al., “In-situ FTIR Measurements of Diffusion in Coking Zeolite Catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 1996, 146, 339-349. |
| Kersten, S. et al., “Options for Catalysis in the Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass into Fuels,” Catalysis for Renewables: From Feedstock to Energy Production, Edited by G. Centi et al., 2007, 119-145. |
| Kim, Y. et al., “A Technical and Economic Evaluation of the Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge for the Production of Bio-oil,” Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99, 1409-1416. |
| Kuroda, K. et al., “Thermal Behavior of β-1 Subunits in Lignin: Pyrolysis of 1,2-Diarylpropane-1,3-diol-type Lignin Model Compounds,” J. Agric. Food Chem., 2007, 55, 2770-2778. |
| Langley, J.T. et al., “Pyrolysis and Combustion of Cellulose. VII. Thermal Analysis of the Phyosphorylation of Cellulose and Model Carbohydrates During Pyrolysis in the Presence of Aromatic Phosphates and Phosphoramides,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1980, 25, 243-262. |
| Lappas, A.A. et al., “Biomass Pyrolysis in a Circulating Fluid Bed Reactor for the Production of Fuels and Chemicals,” Fuel, 2002,81, 2087-2095. |
| Lauer, M., “Implementation of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in Highly Competitive Markets,” Proceedings of the 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas, 1999, 2, 1263-1268. |
| Lee, H.I. et al., “Synthesis of Highly Stable Mesoporous Aluminosilicates from Commercially Available Zeolites and their Application to the Pyrolysis of Woody Biomass,” Catalysis Today, 2008, 132, 68-74. |
| Leung, A. et al., “Pathway for the Catalytic Conversion of Carboxylic Acids to Hydrocarbons over Activated Alumina,” Energy & Fuels, 1995, 9, 913-920. |
| Li, J. et al., “Preparation of Nano-NiO Particles and Evaluation of their Catalytic Activity in Pyrolyzing Biomass Components,” Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22, 16-23. |
| Li, L. et al., “Pyrolysis of Waste Paper: Characterization and Composition of Pyrolysis Oil,” Energy Sources, 2005, 24, 867-873. |
| Li, X. et al., “Effects of Large Pore Zeolite Additions in the Catalytic Pyrolysis Catalyst on the Light Olefins Production,” Catalysis Today, 2007, 125, 270-277. |
| Lima, D.G. et al., “Diesel-like Fuel Obtained by Pyrolysis of Vegetable Oils,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2004, 71, 987-996. |
| Lourvanij, K. et al., “Reaction Rates for the Partial Dehydration of Glucose to Organic Acids in Solid-Acid, Molecular-Sieving Catalyst Power,” J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol., 1997, 69, 35-44. |
| Lourvanij, K. et al., “Reactions of Aqueous Glucose Solutions over Solid-Acid Y-Zeolite Catalyst at 110-160 °C.,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1993, 32, 11-19. |
| LV, P. et al., “A Kinetic Study on Biomass Fast Catalytic Pyrolysis,” Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18, 1865-1869. |
| Malherbe, R.R. et al., “Furfural Oligomerization with H-Fe-FAU Zeolite,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1993, 12, 1037-1038. |
| Marcilla, A. et al., “Kinetic Study of Polypropylene Pyrolysis using ZSM-5 and an Equilibrium Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalyst,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2003, 68-69, 467-480. |
| Matsuzawa, Y. et al., “Evaluation of Char Fuel Ratio in Municipal Pyrolysis Waste,” Fuel, 2004, 83, 1675-1687. |
| McGrath, T. et al., “Low Temperature Mechanism for the Formation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from the Pyrolysis of Cellulose,” J. Anal. Apl. Prolysis, 2003, 66, 51-70. |
| Meier, D. et al., “State of the Art of Applied Fast Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials—a Review,” Bioresource Technology, 1999, 68, 71-77. |
| Milne, T.A. et al., “Molecular Beam Mass Spectrometric Studies of HZSM-5 Activity During Wood Pyrolysis Product Conversion,” International Conference on Research in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, 1998, 910-926. |
| Morris, K., “Fast Pyrolysis of Bagasse to Produce BioOil Fuel for Power Generation,” International Sugar Journal, 2001, 103, (1230), 259-263. |
| Mullen, C. et al., “Chemical composition of Bio-oils Produced by Fast Pyrolysis of Two Energy Crops,” Energy&Fuels, Published online Apr. 19, 2008. |
| Netrabukkana, R. et al., “Diffusion of Glucitol in Microporous and Mesoporous Silicate/Aluminoslicate Catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1996, 35, 458-464. |
| Nokkosmaki, M.I. et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Biomass Pyrolysis Vapours with Zinc Oxide,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2000, 55, 119-131. |
| Nováková, J. et al., “Effect of Heat Treatment on the Character of Coke Deposited on HZSM-5 and HY Zeolites in Acetone Conversion,” Zeolites, 1991, 11, 135-141. |
| Oasmaa, A. et al., “Norms and Standards for Pyrolysis Liquids. End-User Requirements and Specifications,” Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19, 2155-2163. |
| Olazar, M. et al., “Pyrolysis of Sawdust in a conical spouted-bed reactor with a HZSM-5 catalyst,” AIChE Journal, 2000, 45, 1025-1033. |
| Onay, O., “Fast and Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pistacia khinjuk Seed in a Well Swept Fixed Bed Reactor,” Fuel, 2007, 86, 1452-1460. |
| Paine III, J.B. at al., “Carbohydrates Pyrolysis Mechanisms From Isotopic Labeling Part 1: The Pyrolysis of Glycerin; Discovery of competing fragmentation mechanisms affording acetaldehyde and formaldehyde and the implications for carbohydrates pyrolysis,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2007, 80, 297-311. |
| Pakdel, H. et al., “Analysis of Wood Vacuum Pyrolysis Solid Residues by Diffuse Reflectant Infrared Fourier Transform Spectrometry,” Can. J. Chem., 1989, 67, 310-314. |
| Pakdel, H. et al., “Chemical Characterization of Wood Pyrolysis Oils Obtained in a Vacuum-Pyrolysis Multiple-Hearth Reactor,” American Chemical Society Symposium Series, 1988, 376, 203-219. |
| Park, H.J. et al., “Conversion of the Pyrolytic Vapor of Radiata Pine over Zeolites,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2007, 13 (2), 182-189. |
| Pasel, C. et al., “Experimental Investigations on reactor Scale-up and Optimisation of Product Quality in Pyrolysis of Shredder Waste,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 80, 47-67. |
| Pattiya, A. et al., “Catalytic Pyrolysis of Cassava Rhizome,” 2nd Joint International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment Technology and Policy Innovations, Bangkok, Thailand, 2006, 1-6. |
| Pattiya, A. et al., “Fast Pyrolysis of Cassava Rhizome in the Presence of Catalysts,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2008, 81, 72-79. |
| Pavlath, A.E. et al., “Carbohydrate Pyrolysis, II. Formation of Furfural and Furfuryl Alcohol During the Pyrolysis of Section Carbohydrates with Acidic and Basic Catalysts,” Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, Phoenix, AZ, 1988, 155-163. |
| Piskorz, J., “Fast Pyrolysis of Pretreated Wood,” Proceedings, Second Biomass Conference of The Americas, Portland, OR, 1995, 1151-1160. |
| Putuin, E. et al., “Fixed-bed Catalytic Pyrolysis of Cotton-seed Cake: Effects of Pyrolysis Temperature Nature Zeolite Content and Sweeping Gas Flow Rate,” Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97, 701-710. |
| Qi, W.Y. et al., “Catalytic Pyrolysis of Several Kinds of Bamboos over Zeolite NaY,” Green Chem., 2006, 8, 183-190. |
| Renaud, M. et al., “Conversion of Vacuum Paralytic Oils from Populus deltoides over H-ZSM-5,” Proceedings of National Meeting of American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Denver, CO, 1987, 32:2, 276-286. |
| Ritter, S., “A Fast Track to Green Gasoline,” Chemical and Engineering News, 2008, 10. |
| Sahoo, S.K. et al., “Studies on Acidity, Activity and Coke Deactivation of ZSM-5 during n-heptane Aromatization,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 2005, 205, 1-10. |
| Samolada, M.C. et al. “Catalyst Evaluation for Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis,” Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14, 1161-1167. |
| Samolada, M.C. et al., “Catalytic Cracking of Biomass Flash Pyrolysis Liquids,” Developments in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, 1997, 1, 657-671. |
| Samolada, M.C. et al., “Production of a Bio-Gasoline by Upgrading BFPLS via Hydrogen Processing and Catalytic Cracking,” Fuel, 1998, 77, (14), 1667-1675. |
| Sanchez, R. et al., “Structural Characterization of the Polymeric Lattice of Furfuraldehyde Resins,” Polymer Testing, 1998, 17, 395-401. |
| Sanders, E.B. et al., “A Model that Distinguishes the Pyrolysis of D-glucose, D-fructose, and sucrose from that of Cellulose. Application to the understanding of cigarette smoke formation,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2003, 66, 29-50. |
| Sarbak, Z., “Fourier-Transform Infrared Studies on Coke Formation over Alumina Silica-Alumina and Zeolites,” React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2000, 69 (1), 177-181. |
| Scahill, J. et al., “Engineering Aspects of Upgrading Pyrolysis Oil Using Zeolites,” Research in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, Edited by Bridgwater et al., 1988, 927-40. |
| Scott, D.S. et al., “Feasibility Study for a Biomass Refinery Concept,” Making a business from biomass in energy, environment, chemicals, fibers, and materials; Proceedings of the 3rd Biomass Conference of the Americas, M, 1997, 2, 933-944. |
| Serio, M.A. et al., “Measurement and Modeling of Lignin Pyrolysis,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 1994, 7 (1-6), 107-124. |
| Sharma, R.K. et al., “Catalytic Upgrading of Fast Pyrolysis Oil Over HZSM-5,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1993, 71, 383-391. |
| Sharma, R.K. et al., “Catalytic Upgrading of Pyrolysis Oil, Energy & Fuels,” 1993, 7, 306-314. |
| Spath, P. et al., “Options for Thermochemical Processing of Biomass,” Proceedings of the Second Biomass Conference of the Americas, 1995, Issue 607, 607-613. |
| Stocker, M., “Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: catalytic materials and their behavior” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 1999, 29, 3-48. |
| Sulman, E. at al., “Catalysis in Energy-saving Technologies for Fuel Production on the . . . ,” Kataliz V Promyshlennosti, 2004, 5, 43-49. |
| Sulman, E.M. et al., “The Development of the Method of Low-Temperature Peat Pyrolysis on the Basis of Alumosilicate Catalytic System,” Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 134, 162-167. |
| Telysheva, G. at al., “Characterization of the Transformations of Lignocellulosic Structures Upon Degradation in Planted Soil,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2007, 79, 52-60. |
| Toft, A.J. et al., “An Evaluation of Alternative Systems for Electricity Generation from Biomass,” The 1996 ICHEME Research Event, 1996, 2, 552-554. |
| Torre, I. et al., “Catalytic Cracking of Plastic Pyrolysis Waxes with Vacuum Gasoil: Effect of HZSM-5 Zeolite in the FCC Catalyst,” International Journal of Chemical Reactors Engineering, 2006, 4, Article A31, 1-17. |
| Van Santen, R.A., “Renewable Catalytic Technologies—a Perspective,” Catalysis for Renewables: from Feedstock to Energy Production, 2007, 1-20. |
| Venderbosch, R. et al., “Flash Pyrolysis of Wood for Energy and Chemicals,” NPT Procestechnologies, 2000, 7 (I), 16-19. |
| Wang, X., “Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed—Product cleaning by in-situ filtration,” PhD Thesis, University of Twente, 2006, 1-191. |
| Weisz, P.B. at al., “Catalytic Production of High-Grade Fuel (Gasoline) from Biomass Compounds by Shape-Selective Catalysis,” Science, 1979, 206 (5), 57-58. |
| Westerhof, R. et al., “Controlling the Water Content of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 2007, 46, 9238-9247. |
| Williams, P.T. et al., “Comparison of Products from the Pyrolysis and Catalytic Pyrolysis of Rice Husks,” Energy, 2000, 25, 493-513. |
| Williams, P.T. et al., “Fluidised Bed Pyrolysis and Catalytic Pyrolysis of Scrap Tyres,” Environmental Technology, 2003, 24, 921-929. |
| Williams, P.T. et al., “The Influence of Catalyst Regeneration on the Composition of Zeolite-upgraded Biomass Pyrolysis Oils,” Fuel, 1995, 74 (12), 1839-1851. |
| Williams, P.T. et al., “The influence of Catalyst Type on the Composition of upgraded Biomass Pyrolysis Oils,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1995, 31, 39-61. |
| Wooten J.B. et al., “Observation and Characterization of Cellulose Pyrolysis Intermediates by 13C CPMAS NMR. A New Mechanistic Model,” Energy&Fuels—An American Chemical Society Journal, 2004, 18(1), 1-15. |
| Xiao, B. et al., “Chemical, Structural, and Thermal Characterizations of Alkali-soluble Lignins and Hemicelluloses, and Cellulose from Maize Stems, Rye Straw, and Rice Straw,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2001, 74, 307-319. |
| Yaman, S., “Pyrolysis of Biomass to Produce Fuels and Chemical Feedstocks,” Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45, 651-671. |
| Zabaniotou, A. et al., “Experimental Study of Pyrolysis for Potential Energy, Hydrogen and Carbon Material Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, 2433-2444. |
| Zawadzki, J., “Infrared Spectroscopy Studies on Surface functional Groups of Carbons. II. Carbonization of Poly(furfuryl alcohol),” Chemia Stosowana, 1997, 23, (2), 229-240. |
| Zhang, J. et al, “Product Analysis and Thermodynamic Simulations from the Pyrolysis of Several Biomass Feedstocks,” Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21, 2373-2385. |
| Zhenyi, C. et al., “Thermodynamics Calculation of the Pyrolysis of Vegetable Oils,” Energy Sources, 2004, 26, 849-856. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,303, mailed Jul. 3, 2012. |
| Supplemental Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,303, dated May 8, 2012. |
| Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,303, dated Apr. 16, 2012. |
| US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,303, mailed Dec. 15, 2011. |
| Lappas; Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis for Producing Promising Liquid Bio-Fuels (Biocat); Bio-Energy Enlarged Perspectives; Budapest; Oct. 16-17, 2003. |
| Sharma et al.; “Upgrading of pyrolytic lignin fraction of fast pyrolysis oil to hydrocarbon fuels over HZSM-5 in a dual reactor system”; Fuel Processing Technology, 25 (1993) 201-218. |
| Fabbri et al.; “Pyrolysis of cellulose catalysed by nanopowder metal oxides: production and characterization of chiral hydroxylactone and its role as building block”; Green Chem., 2007, 9, 1374-1379. |
| Supplemental European Search Report, Application No. 09718012.9, dated Jul. 28, 2011. |
| Park et al.; “Conversion of the Pyrolytic Vapor of Radiata Pine over Zeolites”; J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 13, No. 2, (2007) 182-189. |
| Olazar et al.; “Pyrolysis of Sawdust in Conical Spouted-Bed Reactor with a HZSM-5 Catalyst”; AIChE Journal, May 2000, vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1025-1033. |
| Nokkosmaki et al.; “Catalytic conversion of biomass pyrolysis vapours with zinc oxide”; Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 55 (2000) 119-131. |
| Gobin et al.; “Polymer degradation to fuels over microporous catalysts as a novel tertiary plastic recycling method”; Polymer Degradation and Stability 83 (2004) 267-279. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,303, filed Mar. 3, 2009. |
| New Zealand First Examination Report, Application No. 614124, dated Aug. 9, 2013. |
| Japanese Office Action, Application No. 2010-549662, mailed Sep. 25, 2013. |
| China Office Action, Application No. 200980116001.X, mailed Oct. 28, 2013. No translation available. |
| Examination Report, New Zealand Application No. 588052, dated Mar. 15, 2011. |
| Examination Report, New Zealand Application No. 588052, dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
| Further Examination Report, New Zealand Application No. 588052, dated Aug. 29, 2013. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1, Australian Application No. 2009220133, dated Mar. 6, 2013. |
| Hyun Ju Park et al., Conversion of the Pyrolytic Vapor of Radiata Pine Over Zeolites, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 13, No. 2, Dec. 31, 2007, pp. 182-189. |
| Agblevor et al., Fractional Pyrolysis of Biomass for High-valued Products, Fuel Chemistry Division Preprints 2002, 47 (1), pp. 374-375. |
| Martin Olazar et al., Pyrolysis of Sawdust in a Conical Spouted-Bed Reactor with a HZSM-5 Catalyst, AICHE Journal, vol. 46, No. 5, Dec. 31, 2000, pp. 1025-1033. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2009/001382, mailed Oct. 26, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US20091001382, mailed Sep. 16, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130023706 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61068001 | Mar 2008 | US | |
| 61098284 | Sep 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12397303 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Child | 13598703 | US |
