Catalytic reduction of NOx

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7498010
  • Patent Number
    7,498,010
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 8, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 3, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A system for NOx reduction in combustion gases, especially from diesel engines, incorporates an oxidation catalyst to convert at least a portion of NO to NO2, a particulate filter, a source of reductant such as NH3 and an SCR catalyst. Considerable improvements in NOx conversion are observed.
Description

The present invention concerns improvements in selective catalytic reduction of NOx in waste gas streams such as diesel engine exhausts or other lean exhaust gases such as from gasoline direct injection (GDI).


The technique named SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) is well established for industrial plant combustion gases, and may be broadly described as passing a hot exhaust gas over a catalyst in the presence of a nitrogenous reductant, especially ammonia or urea. This is effective to reduce the NOx content of the exhaust gases by about 20-25% at about 250° C., or possibly rather higher using a platinum catalyst, although platinum catalysts tend to oxidise NH3 to NOx during higher temperature operation. We believe that SCR systems have been proposed for NOx reduction for vehicle engine exhausts, especially large or heavy duty diesel engines, but this does require on-board storage of such reductants, and is not believed to have met with commercial acceptability at this time.


We believe that if there could be a significant improvement in performance of SCR systems, they would find wider usage and may be introduced into vehicular applications. It is an aim of the present invention to improve significantly the conversion of NOx in a SCR system, and to improve the control of other pollutants using a SCR system.


Accordingly, the present invention provides an improved SCR catalyst system, comprising in combination and in order, an oxidation catalyst effective to convert NO to NO2, a particulate filter, a source of reductant fluid and downstream of said source, an SCR catalyst.


The invention further provides an improved method of reducing NOx in gas streams containing NO and particulates comprising passing such gas stream over an oxidation catalyst under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of NO in the gas stream to NO2, removing at least a portion of said particulates, adding reductant fluid to the gas stream containing enhanced NO2 to form a gas mixture, and passing the gas mixture over an SCR catalyst.


Although the present invention provides, at least in its preferred embodiments, the opportunity to reduce very significantly the NOx emissions from the lean (high in oxygen) exhaust gases from diesel and similar engines, it is to be noted that the invention also permits very good reductions in the levels of other regulated pollutants, especially hydrocarbons and particulates.


The invention is believed to have particular application to the exhausts from heavy duty diesel engines, especially vehicle engines, e.g. truck or bus engines, but is not to be regarded as being limited thereto. Other applications might be LDD (light duty diesel), GDI, CNG (compressed natural gas) engines, ships or stationary sources. For simplicity, however, the majority of this description concerns such vehicle engines.


We have surprisingly found that a “pre-oxidising” step, which is not generally considered necessary because of the low content of CO and unburnt fuel in diesel exhausts, is particularly effective in increasing the conversion of NOx to N2 by the SCR system. We also believe that minimising the levels of hydrocarbons in the gases may assist in the conversion of NO to NO2. This may be achieved catalytically and/or by engine design or management. Desirably, the NO2/NO ratio is adjusted according to the present invention to the most beneficial such ratio for the particular SCR catalyst and CO and hydrocarbons are oxidized prior to the SCR catalyst. Thus, our preliminary results indicate that for a transition metal/zeolite SCR catalyst it is desirable to convert all NO to NO2, whereas for a rare earth-based SCR catalyst, a high ratio is desirable providing there is some NO, and for other transition metal-based catalysts gas mixtures are notably better than either substantially only NO or NO2. Even more surprisingly, the incorporation of a particulate filter permits still higher conversions of NOx.


The oxidation catalyst may be any suitable catalyst, and is generally available to those skilled in art. For example, a Pt catalyst deposited upon a ceramic or metal through-flow honeycomb support is particularly suitable. Suitable catalysts are e.g. Pt/A12O3 catalysts, containing 1-150 g Pt/ft3 (0.035-5.3 g Pt/liter) catalyst volume depending on the NO2/NO ratio required. Such catalysts may contain other components providing there is a beneficial effect or at least no significant adverse effect.


The source of reductant fluid conveniently uses existing technology to inject fluid into the gas stream. For example, in the tests for the present invention, a mass controller was used to control supply of compressed NH3, which was injected through an annular injector ring mounted in the exhaust pipe. The injector ring had a plurality of injection ports arranged around its periphery. A conventional diesel fuel injection system including pump and injector nozzle has been used to inject urea by the present applicants. A stream of compressed air was also injected around the nozzle; this provided good mixing and cooling.


The reductant fluid is suitably NH3, but other reductant fluids including urea, ammonium carbamate and hydrocarbons including diesel fuel may also be considered. Diesel fuel is, of course, carried on board a diesel-powered vehicle, but diesel fuel itself is a less selective reductant than NH3 and is presently not preferred.


Suitable SCR catalysts are available in the art and include Cu-based and vanadia-based catalysts. A preferred catalyst at present is a V2O5/WO3/TiO2 catalyst, supported on a honeycomb through-flow support. Although such a catalyst has shown good performance in the tests described hereafter and is commercially available, we have found that sustained high temperature operation can cause catalyst deactivation. Heavy duty diesel engines, which are almost exclusively turbocharged, can produce exhaust gases at greater than 500° C. under conditions of high load and/or high speed, and such temperatures are sufficient to cause catalyst deactivation. In one embodiment of the invention, therefore, cooling means is provided upstream of the SCR catalyst. Cooling means may suitably be activated by sensing high catalyst temperatures or by other, less direct, means, such as determining conditions likely to lead to high catalyst temperatures. Suitable cooling means include water injection upstream of the SCR catalyst, or air injection, for example utilising the engine turbocharger to provide a stream of fresh intake air by-passing the engine. We have observed a loss of activity of the catalyst, however, using water injection, and air injection by modifying the turbocharger leads to higher space velocity over the catalyst which tends to reduce NOx conversion. Preferably, the preferred SCR catalyst is maintained at a temperature from 160° C. to 450° C.


We believe that in its presently preferred embodiments, the present invention may depend upon an incomplete conversion of NO to NO2. Desirably, therefore, the oxidation catalyst, or the oxidation catalyst together with the particulate trap if used, yields a gas stream entering the SCR catalyst having a ratio of NO to NO2 of from about 4:1 to about 1:3 by vol, for the commercial vanadia-type catalyst. As mentioned above, other SCR catalysts perform better with different NO/NO2 ratios. We do not believe that it has previously been suggested to adjust the NO/NO2 ratio in order to improve NOx reduction.


The present invention incorporates a particulate trap downstream of the oxidation catalyst. We discovered that soot-type particulates may be removed from a particulate trap by “combustion” at relatively low temperatures in the presence of NO2. In effect, the incorporation of such a particulate trap serves to clean the exhaust gas of particulates without causing accumulation, with resultant blockage or back-pressure problems, whilst simultaneously reducing a proportion of the NOx. Suitable particulate traps are generally available, and are desirably of the type known as wall-flow filters, generally manufactured from a ceramic, but other designs of particulate trap, including woven knitted or non-woven heat-resistant fabrics, may be used.


It may be desirable to incorporate a clean-up catalyst downstream of the SCR catalyst, to remove any NH3 or derivatives thereof which could pass through unreacted or as by-products. Suitable clean-up catalysts are available to the skilled person.


A particularly interesting possibility arising from the present invention has especial application to light duty diesel engines (car and utility vehicles) and permits a significant reduction in volume and weight of the exhaust gas after-treatment system, in a suitable engineered system.







Several tests have been carried out in making the present invention. These are described below, and are supported by results shown in graphical form in the attached drawings.


A commercial 10 liter turbocharged heavy duty diesel engine on a test-bed was used for all the tests described herein.


Test 1—(Comparative)


A conventional SCR system using a commercial V2O5/WO3/TiO2 catalyst, was adapted and fitted to the exhaust system of the engine. NH3 was injected upstream of the SCR catalyst at varying ratios. The NH3 was supplied from a cylinder of compressed gas and a conventional mass flow controller used to control the flow of NH3 gas to an experimental injection ring. The injection ring was a 10 cm diameter annular ring provided with 20 small injection ports arranged to inject gas in the direction of the exhaust gas flow. NOx conversions were determined by fitting a NOx analyser before and after the SCR catalyst and are plotted against exhaust gas temperature in FIG. 1. Temperatures were altered by maintaining the engine speed constant and altering the torque applied.


A number of tests were run at different quantities of NH3 injection, from 60% to 100% of theoretical, calculated at 1:1 NH3/NO and 4:3 NH3/NO2. It can readily be seen that at low temperatures, corresponding to light load, conversions are about 25%, and the highest conversions require stoichiometric (100%) addition of NH3 at catalyst temperatures of from 325 to 400° C., and reach about 90%. However, we have determined that at greater than about 70% of stoichiometric NH3 injection, NH3 slips through the SCR catalyst unreacted, and can cause further pollution problems.


Test 2 (Comparative)


The test rig was modified by inserting into the exhaust pipe upstream of the NH3 injection, a commercial platinum oxidation catalyst of 10.5 inch diameter and 6 inch length (26.67 cm diameter and 15.24 cm length) containing log Pt/ft3 (=0.35 g/liter) of catalyst volume. Identical tests were run, and it was observed from the results plotted in FIG. 2, that even at 225° C., the conversion of NOx has increased from 25% to >60%. The greatest conversions were in excess of 95%. No slippage of NH3 was observed in this test nor in the following test.


Test 3


The test rig was modified further, by inserting a particulate trap before the NH3 injection point, and the tests run again under the same conditions at 100% NH3 injection and a space velocity in the range 40,000 to 70,000 hr−1 over the SCR catalyst. The results are plotted and shown in FIG. 3. Surprisingly, there is a dramatic improvement in NOx conversion, to above 90% at 225° C., and reaching 100% at 350° C. Additionally, of course, the particulates which are the most visible pollutant from diesel engines, are also controlled.


Test 4


An R49 test with 80% NH3 injection was carried out over a V2O5/WO3/TiO2 SCR catalyst. This gave 67% particulate, 89% HC and 87% NOx conversion; the results are plotted in FIG. 4.


Additionally tests have been carried out with a different diesel engine, and the excellent results illustrated in Test 3 and 4 above have been confirmed.


The results have been confirmed also for a non-vanadium SCR catalyst.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reducing pollutants, including particulates and NOx, in a gas stream, comprising passing said gas stream over an oxidation catalyst under conditions effective to convert a portion of NO in the gas stream to NO2 to produce a gas mixture comprising a mixture of NO and NO2, wherein the gas mixture has an enhanced NO2 content relative to the gas stream entering the oxidation catalyst, removing at least a portion of said particulates in a particulate trap located downstream of the oxidation catalyst, reacting trapped particulate with NO2, adding reductant fluid to the gas stream to form a gas mixture downstream of said trap, and passing the gas mixture over an SCR catalyst under NOx reduction conditions.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said gas stream is the exhaust from a diesel, GDI or DNG engine.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the gas stream is cooled before reaching the SCR catalyst.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the NO to NO2 ratio of the gas mixture is adjusted to a level pre-determined to be optimum for the SCR catalyst, by oxidation of NO over said oxidation catalyst.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the SCR catalyst is maintained at a temperature from 160° C. to 450° C.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the SCR catalyst includes a component selected from the group consisting of a transition metal and a rare-earth metal.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the SCR catalyst includes a component selected from the group consisting of copper and vanadium.
  • 8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the SCR catalyst is V2O5/WO3/TiO2.
  • 9. A method according to claim 4, wherein the ratio of NO:NO2 leaving the oxidation catalyst is adjusted to about 4:3.
  • 10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the reductant fluid is a hydrocarbon.
  • 11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the reductant fluid is selected from the group consisting of ammonia, ammonium carbamate and urea.
  • 12. A method according to claim 10, further comprising the step of contacting the gas mixture leaving the SCR catalyst with a clean-up catalyst to remove NH3 or derivatives thereof.
  • 13. A method according to claim 1, wherein the space velocity of the exhaust gas over the SCR catalyst is in the range 40,000 to 70,000 h−1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9802504 Feb 1998 GB national
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/601,694, filed Jan. 9, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,805,849, which is the U.S. national phase application of International Application No. PCT/GB99/00292, filed Jan. 28, 1999, and claims priority of British Patent Application No. 9802504.2, filed Feb. 6, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (53)
Number Name Date Kind
3771967 Nowak Nov 1973 A
4093423 Neumann Jun 1978 A
4163042 Lynch Jul 1979 A
4231338 Sugasawa et al. Nov 1980 A
4278639 Tadokoro et al. Jul 1981 A
4351811 Matsuda et al. Sep 1982 A
4406126 Yokokura et al. Sep 1983 A
4534173 Tsukamoto Aug 1985 A
4735927 Gerdes et al. Apr 1988 A
4778665 Krishnamurthy et al. Oct 1988 A
4902487 Cooper et al. Feb 1990 A
4912776 Alcorn Mar 1990 A
4916106 Koschlig et al. Apr 1990 A
4919905 Horaguchi et al. Apr 1990 A
4961917 Byrne Oct 1990 A
5041270 Fujitani et al. Aug 1991 A
5050376 Stiglic et al. Sep 1991 A
5116586 Baacke et al. May 1992 A
5120695 Blumrich et al. Jun 1992 A
5209062 Vollenweider May 1993 A
5224334 Bell Jul 1993 A
5369956 Daudel et al. Dec 1994 A
5417949 McWilliams et al. May 1995 A
5440880 Ceynow et al. Aug 1995 A
5451387 Farnos et al. Sep 1995 A
5473887 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5482692 Audeh et al. Jan 1996 A
5523068 Yang et al. Jun 1996 A
5534237 Yoshida et al. Jul 1996 A
5564283 Yano et al. Oct 1996 A
5628186 Schmelz May 1997 A
5670443 Irite et al. Sep 1997 A
5711147 Vogtlin et al. Jan 1998 A
5711149 Araki Jan 1998 A
5746989 Murachi et al. May 1998 A
5785030 Paas Jul 1998 A
5806308 Khair et al. Sep 1998 A
5811063 Robinson et al. Sep 1998 A
6062026 Woollenweber et al. May 2000 A
6240721 Ito et al. Jun 2001 B1
6274107 Yavuz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294141 Twigg et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301879 Weisweiler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301888 Gray, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6338245 Shimoda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6399034 Weisweiler Jun 2002 B1
6427436 Allansson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6613292 Huthwohl et al. Sep 2003 B1
6826906 Kakwani et al. Dec 2004 B2
6843971 Schäfer-Sindlinger et al. Jan 2005 B2
6845611 Huthwohl et al. Jan 2005 B2
7005116 Schafer-Sindlinger Feb 2006 B2
7143578 Kakwani et al. Dec 2006 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
28 32 002 Jan 1979 DE
33 37 903 May 1985 DE
40 32 085 Apr 1992 DE
42 17 552 Aug 1993 DE
4314896 Nov 1993 DE
4435103 Apr 1996 DE
196 18 397 Nov 1997 DE
197 20 209 Jun 1998 DE
198 27 678 Dec 1999 DE
199 12 374 Mar 2000 DE
201 19 514 Feb 2002 DE
0283452 Sep 1888 EP
0 283 913 Sep 1988 EP
0 283 913 Sep 1988 EP
0319299 Jun 1989 EP
0 341 832 Nov 1989 EP
487886 Jun 1992 EP
515857 Dec 1992 EP
0560991 Sep 1993 EP
0580389 Jan 1994 EP
593790 Apr 1994 EP
615777 Sep 1994 EP
0 628 706 Dec 1994 EP
0664147 Jul 1995 EP
0 758 713 Feb 1997 EP
0 806 553 Nov 1997 EP
0955080 Nov 1999 EP
1065352 Jan 2001 EP
1147801 Oct 2001 EP
1194681 Apr 2002 EP
1251249 Oct 2002 EP
1014498 Dec 1965 GB
2134407 Aug 1984 GB
57-171425 Oct 1982 JP
59-87220 May 1984 JP
63-38620 Mar 1988 JP
63-236522 Oct 1988 JP
1-318715 Dec 1989 JP
5-31327 Feb 1993 JP
5-65817 Mar 1993 JP
6159037 Jun 1994 JP
7-119445 May 1995 JP
8-103636 Apr 1996 JP
8-281061 Oct 1996 JP
8-509795 Oct 1996 JP
8-338320 Dec 1996 JP
9-53442 Feb 1997 JP
9-88727 Mar 1997 JP
92-06559 Aug 1997 JP
WO 9939809 Aug 1999 JP
WO 9013362 Nov 1990 WO
WO - 9601689 Jan 1996 WO
WO-9743528 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9909307 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9944725 Sep 1999 WO
WO 00072965 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0104466 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0214657 Feb 2002 WO
WO 02041991 May 2002 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040258594 A1 Dec 2004 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09601964 Jan 2001 US
Child 10886778 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/GB99/00292 Jan 1999 US
Child 09601964 US