Catheter-based off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging system

Description

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are imaging catheters. In particular, OCT imaging catheters, systems, and methods of using them with an off-axis optical fiber are described herein.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Visualization during minimally invasive surgical procedures has long been understood to enhance the performance and outcomes of surgical procedures. However, successful visualization, particularly visualization into a tissue volume, has proven elusive. One promising catheter-based visualization technology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT has shown promise as an “ultrasound-like” optical visualization method, in which a thickness of the tissue volume may be imaged to reveal internal structures at relatively high resolution.

OCT may be particularly useful in conjunction with a catheter that may traverse tissues and body lumens and may, in some variations, be configured to modify or sample tissue in conjunction with the imaging or guided by the imaging. For example, an OCT imaging catheter may be configured as an atherectomy catheter. A significant body of scientific and clinical evidence supports atherectomy as a viable primary or adjunctive therapy prior to stenting for the treatment of occlusive coronary artery disease. Atherectomy offers a simple mechanical advantage over alternative therapies. By removing the majority of plaque mass (debulking) it creates a larger initial lumen and dramatically increases the compliance of the arterial wall. As a result, for example, stent deployment would be greatly enhanced following site preparation with atherectomy. There are advantages related to the arterial healing response. By removing the disease with minimal force applied to the vessel and reducing the plaque burden prior to stent placement, large gains in lumen size can be created with decreased vessel wall injury and limited elastic recoil. This has been shown to translate into better acute results and lower restenosis rates.

Physician practice is often to a treat target lesion as if it is composed of concentric disease even though intravascular diagnostic devices have consistently shown significantly eccentric lesions. This circumferential treatment approach virtually ensures that native arterial wall and potentially healthy vessel will be stressed, stretched or cut unnecessarily.

Currently available systems are poorly adapted for real-time imaging, particularly for use in catheters including atherectomy catheters. For example, much is already known about FORJ technology (Fiber Optic Rotating Junction), spinning mirrors, spinning prisms, and motors in the distal tips of catheters. However, such embodiments take up a lot of space, so much so that they may not be practical for use in conjunction with a therapeutic embodiment such as an atherectomy device.

It is generally desirable to reduce the crossing profile of the catheter to enable access to distal tortuous vessels in the heart or the periphery without collateral damage. The invention described here may achieve these aims. There are no large, expensive, fragile rotating junctions or rotating mechanisms in the catheter distal tip. The fiber is terminated in an adhesive that forms a single, unique, well-defined reference reflection with no complicating intermediate reflections. The drive shaft can have a small OD (0.012″ demonstrated), minimizing the effect on crossing profile.

The devices described herein may form a circumferential view using the imaging catheter, allowing a true full circumferential field of view with a very small impact on crossing profile while preserving the ability to use common-path interferometry. Prior art devices (e.g., Lightlab™ ImageWire, MGH fiber optic rotating junctions, Cardiospectra (Milner)) generate full circumferential views inside a body lumen either by having a fiber rotating junction (e.g., http://www.princetel.com/product_forj.asp) between the OCT console and the catheter tip, with spinning of the optical fiber, by having a mechanism on the end of the catheter that rotates a mirror or prism, or by wagging the fiber in one or two axes or planes.

A FORJ necessarily introduces a break in the fiber. In this type of system, light goes from being confined in the core of the fiber to propagating in free space and is then re-imaged back into the fiber. See, e.g., Bouma (U.S. Pat. No. 7,382,949). Two problems immediately ensue from this arrangement. First, the break in the fiber and the re-imaging optics create several surfaces with potentially very large return losses (back-reflections) compared to the usual OCT reference reflection. This makes the device difficult to use with common-path interferometry, as the interferometer will index off the first substantial reflection. One cannot simply make the reference reflection brighter than these surfaces, as (a) this would then create a reference reflection that could saturate the detector if it needed to be greater than, for example, 20 microWatts, and (b) the strong reflections present in the proximal optical path could still lead to artifacts in the OCT image, as these reflective surfaces would still be orders of magnitude brighter than the signal from the tissue. Second, the alignment of the two fiber cores has to be maintained to an exceptionally high tolerance, typically less than 0.5 microns of wobble as the device rotates. Such a high level of accuracy drives up the cost of the device significantly, which is something of particular concern in a single-use disposable device.

One attempted solution to the internal reflection problem in the FORJ is to have a rotating junction that incorporates index matching fluid between the fixed and rotating fiber cores. This solution is not really suitable for cost and complexity reasons as a component of a one-time-use disposable catheter. Incorporating the FORJ into the capital equipment complicates the design of the interface as this now has to be a sterilizable multi-use unit resistant to liquid and contaminant ingress. These requirements may be incompatible with the materials and assembly techniques used to make the FORJ.

Furthermore, a rotating mechanism on the distal tip significantly increases the crossing profile and complexity of the device. It is generally unsuitable for use with a single-use disposable device where costs must be minimized. In a device intended for small diameter body lumens, for example coronary arteries, the presence of a large diameter mechanism in the distal tip will define the maximum vessel size that can be safely treated. The mechanism may also increase the rigid length of the catheter, which will in turn restrict the vessel tortuosity into which the catheter may be safely inserted. This may preclude use of the device in the mid- or distal coronary arteries or in the distal peripheral vasculature, for example the dorsalis pedis.

The methods, devices and systems described herein allow intra-luminal common-path low-coherence interferometry with a contiguous fiber path while also allowing the creation of and updating of 360° circumferential views inside a vessel with angle and longitudinal encoding. Common-path interferometry is highly desirable for a catheter, as it eliminates the need for a separate reference arm and makes operation insensitive to manufacturing variations in catheter length. The devices, systems and methods described herein allow for creation of a >360° circumferential view as well as a 3-D reconstruction or rendition of the traversed tissue volume, without a break in fiber continuity. These methods, devices and system are particularly suitable for directional atherectomy or directional re-entry, as the imaging element can be steered towards a region of interest and allowed to dwell there so that the cut progression and depth can be monitored in real time.

There is a need for a method of forming a circumferential image in a lumen in a manner that permits the use of common-path interferometry and that has a minimal impact on crossing profile and work flow in the catheter lab. Common path interferometry eliminates the down-lead sensitivity that makes catheters for Michelson interferometry very costly to produce. This is because the catheter length has to be matched to the reference arm in the console to within a few microns or to within the adjustability of the reference arm. Common-path interferometry also allows the console to be placed an almost arbitrary distance from the patient and fluoroscopy equipment. The invention described here achieves these aims. The fiber is contiguous from console to distal tip, with no breaks to cause large back-reflections thereby permitting common path interferometry.

Furthermore, it would be very useful to provide catheter devices and methods of using them that permit the off-axis placement of the optical fiber used to form the OCT image. Off-axis placement of the fiber would allow the center (core) of the catheter to be used for passing guidewires, additional manipulators, tissue (including cut tissue), drive trains, or the like. However, optical fibers that are positioned off-axis within a catheter may be difficult to manipulate in the formation of a 360° image, since it may be necessary to rotate the entire catheter, rather than just the optical fiber, as is commonly done. Rotation of the entire catheter, including the off-axis optical fiber, relative to a proximate handle or control may result in tangling or binding of the optical fiber at the proximal location. This could ultimately lead to degradation of the image quality and a break in the workflow of the catheter lab environment while the optical fiber is untangled or managed during a surgical procedure.

The devices and systems described herein typically describe catheter-based, off-axis OCT systems that may address many of the needs and problems described above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are catheters having off-axis optical fibers for OCT imaging, OCT imaging systems having off-axis optical fibers and methods of using OCT imaging catheters and systems.

The devices and systems described herein may include a catheter having a handle and a catheter body that is rotatable independently of the catheter body, and an optical fiber extending along the length of the catheter body while being radially displaced (off-axis) from the longitudinal axis (midline) of the catheter body. The optical fiber may be present in a channel.

For example, described herein are Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) catheter devices for visualizing a body lumen by rotation of the catheter and an off-axis optical fiber within the catheter, the device comprising: a catheter body having an elongate proximal to distal length; an optical fiber extending the length of the catheter body along a path that is off-axis of the elongate length of the catheter body; a proximal handle rotationally coupled to the catheter body; and a fiber management pathway within the handle configured to allow the off-axis optical fiber to rotate with the catheter body, relative to the handle.

The catheter body may include a central lumen and/or any appropriate number of additional lumens, including off-axis (e.g., axially displaced from the central lumen) lumens. In some variations, the catheter body includes a channel for the optical fiber. The channel may be located off-axis of the elongate length of the catheter body.

The catheter devices described herein may also include a rotation knob that is coupled to the catheter body and is configured to rotate the catheter body when manipulated. The handle may comprise a limiter configured to define the allowable number of rotations of the catheter body. The limiter may be configured to restrict rotation of the catheter body to any number of full or fractional revolutions, with the typical range in constructed embodiments being between about two to six full rotations. The limiter may be configured to prevent rotation of the catheter body more than four full rotations. This may be useful, for example, in a monorail-type (Rapid exchange) configuration of a catheter, in which it may prevent the guide wire from getting wrapped around the catheter torque shaft and forming a potentially destructive reaming surface. The limiter may be configured to prevent rotation of the catheter body more than five full rotations.

In some variations, the rotation knob is configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of greater than one times the rotation of the rotation knob. The rotation knob may be configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of 1:n (knob rotation:catheter body rotation), where n is an arbitrary whole or fractional number. It is possible to construct the knob to enable reverse rotation of the catheter body with respect to the rotation knob (i.e., 1:−n). In practice, the rotation knob has been constructed at ratios of 1:3 and 1:4 with respect to the catheter body. For example, the rotation knob may be configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of between about 1.5 and about five times the rotation of the rotation knob; the rotation knob may be configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of about four times the rotation of the rotation knob.

In some variations, the device includes a side-facing port that is optically coupled to the distal end region of the optical fiber. The optical fiber may be fixedly attached to the distal end region of the catheter. The optical fiber may be only fixedly attached within the catheter body to the distal end region of the catheter, and is otherwise free to move longitudinally relative to the elongate length of the catheter body.

In some variations, the device further includes a rotational encoder configured to encode the rotational position of the catheter body. In some variations, the device may be used in collaboration with a position sensor subunit/system through which the catheter can be placed to encode the relative rotational and longitudinal position of the device. The position sensor can be of varied operating principles. For example, it may be optical or capacitive, or consisting of singular or plurality of sensing elements. More specifically, for example, the position sensor can be an optical mouse chip or a capacitive fingerprint sensor.

The fiber management pathway may include a helically-arranged channel having a plurality of turns. The helically-arranged channel may be configured as part of a spool. The spool may be positioned or held within the handle, and may rotate with the catheter body. In some variations, the fiber management pathway includes a helically-arranged channel having a plurality of turns, wherein the channel comprises walls having an upper radial height and a lower radial height. For example, the fiber management may be configured so that the fiber does not contact the upper radial height or the lower radial height of the helically arranged channel.

In some variations, the fiber management pathway is configured so that the fiber does not traverse a bend radius of less than the light leakage bend radius for the optical fiber. For example, the fiber management pathway may be configured so that the fiber does not traverse a bend radius of less than about a 5 mm bend radius.

Also described herein are Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) catheter devices for visualizing a body lumen by rotation of the catheter and an off-axis optical fiber within the catheter that include: a catheter body having an elongate proximal to distal length; an optical fiber fixed to a distal end region of the catheter body and extending the length of the catheter body along a path that is off-axis of the elongate length of the catheter body; a proximal handle rotationally coupled to the catheter body; and a fiber management pathway comprising a helical channel within the handle that has a plurality of turns, an upper radial height and a lower radial height; and a limiter that restricts the number of catheter body revolutions, thereby preventing the optical fiber from exceeding the upper or lower radial heights of the helical channel as the catheter body is rotated relative to the handle.

Also described herein are methods of managing an optical fiber for off-axis rotation of an Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) system, the method comprising the steps of: taking an OCT image using an optical fiber that is fixed to a distal end region of a catheter body and that extends along the length of the catheter body through an off-axis pathway within the catheter body and into a fiber management channel within a proximal handle to which the catheter body is rotationally fixed; and rotating the catheter body relative to the proximal handle so that the catheter body and optical fiber are simultaneously rotated.

The method may also include the step of limiting the rotation of the catheter body so that the optical fiber does not traverse a bend radius of less than the light leakage bend radius for the optical fiber. For example, the fiber management pathway may be configured so that the optical fiber does not traverse a bend radius of less than about a 5 mm bend radius.

The method may also include the step of encoding the rotation of the catheter relative to the handle.

In some variations, the method also includes the step of permitting the fiber to extend longitudinally within a channel extending off-axis along the length of the catheter.

The method may also include the step of limiting the rotation of the catheter body relative to the handle to a specific number of revolutions, for example, between about 2 and about 6 full rotations. In some variations, the method may limit the rotation of the catheter body relative to the handle to about five full rotations.

The step of rotating may comprise rotating a rotation knob that is coupled to the handle to rotate the catheter body relative to the handle. For example, the rotation knob may be configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of 1:n (knob rotation:catheter body rotation), for example, a ratio of greater than one times the rotation of the rotation knob. The rotation knob may be configured to rotate the catheter body by a ratio of 1:4, where about one full clockwise rotation of the knob results in about four full clockwise rotations of the catheter, or (in some variations) between about 1.5 and about five times the rotation of the rotation knob.

Also described herein are methods of managing an optical fiber that is positioned off-axis of a rotating Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) system, the method comprising the steps of: taking an OCT image using an optical fiber that is fixed to a distal end region of a catheter body and that extends along the length of the catheter body through an off-axis pathway within the catheter body and into a fiber management channel within a proximal handle to which the catheter body is rotationally coupled, the channel having a plurality of helical turns and an upper radial height and a lower radial height; and rotating the catheter body relative to the proximal handle so that the optical fiber winds/unwinds and expands/contracts within helical turns of the fiber management channel between the upper radial height and the lower radial height as the catheter body is rotated in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions.

The method may also include the step of limiting the rotation of the catheter so that the optical fiber does expand/contract (e.g., coil) within the helical turns of the fiber management channel to a height that is greater than the upper radial height or less than the lower radial height.

Also described herein are methods of imaging a body lumen by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) using an elongate OCT catheter having an OCT sensor fixedly attached to a distal portion of the catheter. These methods may include the steps of: rotating the catheter from a proximal region of the catheter to rotate the OCT sensor at the distal portion while acquiring OCT images using the OCT sensor; and determining a rotational lag (θ) for the OCT sensor at the distal portion; and providing one or more OCT images corrected for the rotational lag.

In any of the methods described herein, the catheter may comprise an optical fiber extending off-axis along the length of the catheter.

The step of rotating the catheter from a proximal region of the catheter may comprises rotating the catheter at least 360 degrees in a first rotational direction. In some variations, the step of rotating the catheter from a proximal region of the catheter comprises acquiring a first image while rotating the catheter at least 360 degrees in a first rotational direction and acquiring a second image while rotating the catheter at least 360 degrees in a second rotational direction. Thus, the step of determining the rotational lag (θ) may comprise comparing an OCT image acquired while rotating in a first rotational direction to an OCT image acquired while rotating in a second rotational direction.

The method may also include storing the rotational lag (θ) determined for correction of additional OCT images.

The step of rotating the catheter from the proximal region of the catheter may comprise rotating the catheter from the proximal region until motion of the distal region is observed and recording the extent of rotation of the distal region of the catheter. In some variations, the step of rotating the catheter from the proximal region of the catheter comprises rotating the catheter in a first rotational direction and a second rotational direction from the proximal region until motion of the distal region is observed in the first direction and the second rotational direction and recording the extent of rotation of the distal region of the catheter in the first rotational direction and the second rotational directions. For example, the step of determining the rotational lag (θ) may comprise determining the difference of the extents of rotation of the distal regions of the catheter in the first rotational direction and the second rotational directions.

Also described herein are methods of imaging a body lumen by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) using an elongate OCT catheter having a central axis and an OCT sensor fixedly attached off-axis at a distal portion of the catheter, where the method includes the steps of: rotating the OCT sensor at the distal portion while acquiring OCT images using the OCT sensor; and displaying the OCT images as a toroidal mapping.

The step of displaying the OCT images may comprise determining the toroidal mapping based on the radial position of the OCT sensor relative to the catheter central axis of the catheter.

In some variations, the method further comprises correcting radial distortion in the image by scaling the OCT images. For example, the method may comprise correcting radial distortion in the image by multiplying the radial positions of the OCT images by a correction factor. In some variations, the method further comprises correcting radial distortion in the image by adding a correction offset to the radial positions of the OCT. In some variations, the method further comprises correcting radial distortion in the image by applying a mapping table of correction offsets to the radial positions of the OCT.

Also described herein are methods of imaging a body lumen by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) using an elongate OCT catheter having a central axis and an OCT sensor fixedly attached off-axis at a distal portion of the catheter, the method comprising: acquiring a first plurality of OCT scan lines using the OCT sensor; point-wise averaging of data in the first plurality of scan lines; transforming the averaged first plurality of scan lines by Inverse Fourier Transform; and displaying the OCT images as a toroidal mapping.

In some variations, the method of further comprises repeating the steps of acquiring, point-wise averaging and transforming for multiple pluralities of OCT scan lines, and in some variations, the multiple pluralities of OCT scan lines may be point-wise averaged to post-FFT average the OCT image.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustrating one variation of a system including an OCT catheter with an off-axis optical fiber.

FIGS. 2A and 2B show variations of a handle for an OCT catheter including a fiber management pathway allowing rotation of the catheter and optical fiber relative to the catheter handle body.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show one variation of a catheter body including an off-axis fiber optic.

FIGS. 4A-4D show different views (cross-sectional, front, side perspective, and exploded views, respectively) of another variation of a handle including an optical fiber management mechanism.

FIG. 5 illustrates one variation of an optical fiber management region within a handle.

FIGS. 6A-6D show side perspective, side, front, and cross-sectional views, respectively of one variation of an optical fiber management spool that may be used as part of an optical fiber management mechanism.

FIGS. 7A-7D show side perspective, side, front, and cross-sectional views, respectively of another variation of an optical fiber management spool that may be used as part of an optical fiber management mechanism.

FIGS. 8A-11 illustrate one method of determining the dimensions of the spool of the fiber management pathway.

FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate various encoders that may be used with any of the catheters and systems described herein.

FIG. 13 illustrates one example of a toroidal (annular) display of an OCT image as described herein.

FIG. 14A shows a transparent view of one example of a catheter handle including a motor for rotating the catheter body. FIG. 14B is a partially opened view of another example of a catheter handle including a motor and a fiber management system.

FIG. 15 illustrates a method of determining the proper orientation of a scan image when the direction of rotation changes.

FIGS. 16A-16B illustrate various methods for showing when phase delay compensation is occurring.

FIG. 17 shows notes and illustrations overlaid on a sector image.

FIGS. 18A-18B illustrate one method of image distortion correction.

FIG. 19 illustrates an indicator superimposed over the image corresponding to a desired tissue depth to be monitored.

FIG. 20A illustrates a normal image and FIG. 20B illustrates the same image after applying an aggressive contrast stretch technique to enhance the image.

FIG. 21 shows the contrast curve used to achieve the contrast stretched image of FIG. 20B.

FIG. 22 shows a scan image where the bright layers have been highlighted.

FIG. 23 shows a waterfall image superimposed with tag information.

FIG. 24 schematically illustrates one method of determining a lag-correction angle, θ.

FIG. 25 schematically illustrates another method of determining a lag-correction angle, θ.

FIG. 26 schematically illustrates a method of indicating lag correction.

FIG. 27A-C schematically illustrate various methods for correcting the image to adjust the scaling.

FIG. 28 schematically illustrates a method for reducing noise by FFT averaging of the signal(s).

FIG. 29 schematically illustrates one variation of the post-FFT averaging method.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are OCT catheters and imaging systems using them, including methods for using them to image. In general, an OCT catheter as described herein is a flexible elongate catheter that includes an optical fiber for OCT imaging that extends the length of the catheter. The pathway taken by the optical fiber is displaced from the central longitudinal (proximal-distal) axis of the catheter, and thus may be referred to as off-axis. The catheter body is typically rotationally coupled to a handle portion so that the catheter body and the optical fiber rotate together relative to the handle.

OCT Catheters Having Off-Axis Optical Fibers

FIG. 1 illustrates one variation of an OCT catheter having an off-axis optical fiber that may form part of an OCT imaging system configured as described herein. In this example, the device includes a catheter 1101 having a distal end 1103 that includes a one-dimensional OCT sensor (typically configured as a common-path interferometry device that does not require a separate reference arm). The sensor includes an optical fiber that extends through the length of the catheter and is (in this example) attached by an adhesive to the distal end region of the catheter. The “lens” of the OCT optical fiber is positioned facing outwards axially from a side of the distal end 1103 region. The hatched arrow 1121 indicates the imaging pathway (not to scale) from the sensor. The catheter 1101 may have an elongate and flexible catheter body 1105. The device may be configured so that the optical fiber imaging from the distal end is contained within the elongate body. The distal end of the optical fiber may be, as mentioned above, connected or fixed relative to a region (e.g., the distal end region) of the catheter, but may otherwise be unfixed in the body of the catheter. For example, the catheter may include an off-axis channel in which the optical fiber resides along the length of the catheter body. This channel may be lubricated to allow the fiber to slide axially (distal-proximal) as the catheter body bends or curves. In general, however, the optical fiber extends in a pathway that is radially displaced from the midline of the longitudinal axis (long axis) of the catheter. The pathway may be in a channel or lumen within the catheter body or it may be within an annular channel. In some variations, the optical fiber may extend in a straight path along the length of the catheter body, while in other variations, the optical fiber may extend in a helical or arbitrarily winding pathway, wrapping around the longitudinal axis of the catheter body.

The catheter is connected distally to a handle 1107 located at the proximal end of the device. A control 1109 on the handle 1107 may be used to rotate the catheter body, including the fiber optic that forms the one-dimensional scanner at the distal end. The control may be a rotational or rotary control, such as a wheel or knob. The control may be geared so that the rotation of the control 1109 has a mechanical advantage for rotating the catheter body. The system may be geared so that there is a 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, etc. mechanical/rotational advantage. For example, a 1:4 rotational advantage means that for every full rotation (e.g., 360°) of the control 1109 on the handle, the sensor passes through four full rotations (e.g., 1440°). Partial rotations of the control 1109 are multiplied for increased rotation at the distal end 1103 by the sensor. In practice, any ratio for the mechanical advantage between 1:1 and about 1:6 may be useful. For example a 1:1 ratio is as low one may desire for image quality reasons, and a ratio of 6:1 may be an upper limit to avoid loss of tactile feedback. For example when the catheter gets into a tight lesion, if there is too much mechanical advantage tearing may occur.

The distal end of the catheter may be configured as an atherectomy device and may include one or more tissue-removal elements and controls (not shown). For example, the device may include jaws, thermal/electrical/optical ablation devices, or the like, for removal of material from the vessel. The control for such elements may be positioned on the handle 1107. Rotation of the sensor may also rotate the tissue-removal elements.

The control 1109 controlling rotation of the one-dimensional sensor (rotational control) may be any appropriate control, including a dial, knob, button, etc. The handle may be configured to be hand held, although it may be configured to be operated by one- or two-hands. The handle may be configured to be held by a peripheral device. In some variations the control is configured to be operated by one or more fingers of the hand holding the handle. The handle may also include additional sensors, including an encoder for determining rotation or rotational position of the controller, as described in greater detail below.

The system may also include a connection to a controller 1111 for controlling the sensor, including applying power and receiving input from the sensor. The controller may be configured to perform the OCT image processing and to ultimately display one or more images representing the OCT images. The controller may also receive input from the encoder or other sensor on the handle. The OCT light source and any other OCT elements may also be included and/or connected to the controller 1111.

In some variations one or more additional input devices (not shown in FIG. 11) may also be used to communicate user commands/input to the controller 1111 and/or catheter 1101. An input device (or controller input device) may be a keyboard, keypad, joystick, mouse, etc. and may allow input of commands or selection of options to the system (or presented by the system) for controlling operation of the system. For example, the input device may allow the user to outline/markup regions of interest (e.g., using a mouse, pen, keyboard, etc.), or to toggle on/off recording/memory or determine parameters (including calibration parameters) of the system.

The system may also include one or more displays or monitors 1113 for displaying the imaging.

In some variations, the system may also include one or more fluid application and/or removal components. For example, the catheter 1101 may include one or more ports for connection to a fluid perfusion source 1115 (e.g., saline, etc.) during operation. Thus, fluid may be perfused from the proximal end of the device out of the distal end of the device (e.g., across the imaging sensor at the distal end). In some variations, the system may be adapted to remove cut material from the distal end of the device (e.g., either via suction, aspiration, or internal storage).

As mentioned above, an imaging system as described herein typically includes an optical fiber forming the OCT sensor element at the distal end of a catheter and a processor coupled to the catheter for processing imaging information received from the scanner and catheter. The catheter can be an atherectomy catheter with a cutting device. The processor or controller 1111 can include image processing software, hardware, firmware, or the like.

The OCT images collected may be displayed in any appropriate manner, including using two or more display modalities. For example, a one-dimensional OCT image may be displayed on a rotational axis by displaying as a toroid (e.g., two-dimensional ‘doughnut’ shape), as described in greater detail below. The one-dimensional OCT image data may also be displayed along a time axis as a waterfall-type display.

Displaying one-dimensional OCT imaging data as a two-dimensional azimuthal image (OCT data with respective rotational angles) can be produced by rotating the catheter and displaying the one-dimensional scans using angular information from the proximal end of the catheter. This rotational image is typically a toroid or doughnut-type display and may emphasize the relative rotational relationship between the different scans. As described in greater detail below, this display roughly approximates a cross-sectional view through the region (e.g., the lumen of a vessel) surrounding the catheter with the one-dimensional scanner. This image may not be scaled; furthermore the orientation of the image may not necessarily reflect absolute orientation in the patient. Instead, the orientation may be relative to the location of the scanning OCT imaging pathway.

Exemplary toroidal or azimuthal images are shown in FIGS. 15-20 and 22. The imaging space is the doughnut-shaped area between inner and outer circles. The inner circle may be thought of as the catheter with the outwardly directed one-dimensional scanner on the outer perimeter. A line (often shown as colored) extending axially outward from this inner circle represents the relative position of the one-dimensional scanner that is imaging outward into the surrounding region (e.g., the lumen of a blood vessel). If the catheter with the one-dimensional scanner (an OCT scanner) is held substantially axially fixed in the lumen of a vessel and rotated, the resulting 2D image may represent an OCT image of a cross-section through the surrounding vessel, including penetrating into the vessel walls. The catheter is typically manually rotatable back and forth axially around the vessel.

One of the challenges of manual rotation of these catheters is that there may be a substantial lag between the rotation applied (e.g., at the proximal end by the user) and the actual rotation of the distal end of the catheter where the one-dimensional imaging system (optical fiber) imaging pathway extends from the catheter. This problem is addressed in greater detail below.

As mentioned briefly above, images from the catheter may also be displayed on a time axis, separately from the angular rotation axis given by the toroidal, azimuthal images just described. Thus, images relating to time and tissue depth can be produced without the angular information; these images may be referred to herein as “waterfall” images. These may also be referred to (per ultrasound nomenclature) as M-mode images (e.g., depth vs. time). Both azimuthal and waterfall images can be displayed simultaneously on a visual display or displays, providing users with information about both the relative position and relative depth of structures related to the one-dimensional scanner. Thus, a display may include both azimuthal and waterfall images of the one-dimensional scanner. The relative importance of the two modes of display can be changed in real time to reflect the nature of the surgical procedure. For example the waterfall or M-mode display is more valuable during a cutting (atherectomy) operation, whereas the radial display is more useful for pre-treatment survey and planning, and post-treatment outcome assessment. The switch may be made automatically with a control on the device handle, or for example by sensing the actuation of the atherectomy cutter. In some variations the system may therefore provide a processor for processing and presenting the information from the scanner, memory for storing information from the scanner and/or user, one or more computer monitors or television screens for displaying the images, a graphical user interface (GUI) allowing interaction with the images, and a control or controller for operating the imaging system. Additional elements (some of which are describe below) may also be included.

For example, a catheter for imaging as described herein can include a hand piece near the proximal end and a controller configured as a thumb/finger wheel on the hand piece for controlling rotation of the catheter during imaging. FIGS. 2A and 2B show variations of handles or hand pieces. Rotation of the finger wheel 202 in the counter-clockwise direction causes the catheter body (and therefore the OCT imaging element secured at the distal end region of the catheter) to rotate in the counter-clockwise direction, and rotation of the finger wheel 202 in the clockwise direction causes the scanner on the distal end of the catheter to rotate in the clockwise direction. The finger wheel can also be configured to produce opposite rotation of the catheter body (i.e., clockwise finger wheel rotation producing counter clockwise catheter body rotation). As discussed briefly above, the finger wheel 202 can be configured to rotate the catheter at various gearing ratios, such as 1/2× (1/2:1), 2× (1:2), 3× (1:3), 4× (1:4), etc. For example, when the finger wheel is implemented with a 4× gear ratio, a 90 degree rotation of the finger wheel translates to a 360 degree rotation of the distal (imaging) end of the catheter.

The catheter body region of the OCT catheter generally is an elongate, flexible and thin body region extending distally from the handle. The catheter body is rotationally coupled to the handle. FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate one variation of a catheter body, showing a cross-section through the catheter body to indicate the off-axis pathway taken by the optical fiber forming the OCT image. For example, in FIG. 3A, the catheter body 301 is an elongate, flexible tube having a central hollow lumen 307 and an off-axis central passage 305 through which an optical fiber 303 may pass. The optical fiber 303 may terminate distally at a window (e.g., a side-facing window) 309, from which the optical pathway forming the OCT image may extend (dashed line). The cut-away region 313 of the catheter body in FIG. 3A shows the internal arrangement of the off-axis pathway 305 for the optical fiber 303, and the center lumen 307.

FIG. 3B shows a cross-section through the catheter, also indicating the arrangement of the off-axis pathway 305 for the optical fiber 303, and the center lumen 307. The catheter body may also include additional internal lumens (not shown).

Any appropriate optical fiber (e.g., fiber optic) may be used, including bend-tolerant fibers (e.g., “bendable” or “bend-loss resistant” fibers). For example, in one variation, the optical fiber has a fiber cut-off of less than 1240 nm and single mode performance between 1270 and 1380 nm (and be manufactured compatible with SMF-28 standards). The outer jacket of the fiber optic cable may be 2 or 3 mm (OD) polyurethane, for example. The optical fiber connectors may be Diamond E2108.6 connectors with a 0.25 dB maximum insertion loss and a −65 dB maximum return loss. Typically, optical fibers have a defined minimum bend radius corresponding to the radius below which the signal loss through the wall of the fiber from the fiber core occurs. For example, a highly bend-loss resistant fiber will have a minimum bend radius threshold of approximately 5 mm. When the fiber is bent to a curve with a radius less than this minimum bend radius, the signal (light) within the fiber will decrease beyond acceptable levels as light is lost through of the wall of the fiber.

As mentioned, by resisting one end of the optical fiber to the rotatable catheter body, the optical fiber will rotate with the catheter body relative to the handle. This off-axis rotation of the optical fiber with the catheter may result in pulling and bending of the optical fiber. As mentioned above, the signal on the fiber may degrade as the fiber is bent, even in the most bend-tolerant (bend-loss resistant) optical fibers. Further, the fiber optic may potentially tangle, making the catheter difficult to use, and may ultimately break if too much mechanical force is applied.

Thus, the catheter handles described herein may be adapted for handling the off-axis rotation and bending of the optical fiber in the catheter. For example, any of the handles described herein may include an optical fiber management pathway through which the optical fiber extends from the rotating catheter body. The optical fiber management pathway may be configured so that the fiber does not bend beyond the minimum bend radius of the optical fiber (which may range between 5 mm and 25 mm). For example, the overall fiber management pathway within the handle may traverse bend radii greater than about 5 mm, greater than about 7.5 mm, greater than 10 mm, etc.

Within the handle, the optical fiber management pathway may include a defined pathway around a spool or drum. For example, the pathway may be configured in a helical geometry. Non-helical pathways are also possible, and may be used. The spool may include a helical channel that curves around an approximately cylindrical body. The channel may have defining elements (e.g., walls, separated ribs, fins, etc.) extending from a top (e.g., upper radius) to a bottom (e.g., lower radius). An optical fiber may pass along this channel in a defined pathway and wind around the spool; within the channel, the turns or windings of the fiber do not overlap or interact with each other, but are kept separate by the defining elements of the channel (e.g., walls). As the optical fiber is rotated off-axis, the windings of the fiber may expand or constrict within the helical channel (simultaneously unwinding and winding, respectively). The stiffness of the optical fiber will allow the tension on the fiber to approximately uniformly expand and unwind within the helical turns around the spool. This is described below, for example in FIG. 5. The dimensions of the channels of the fiber management system, including the size of the spool and the heights of channel walls, for example, as set by the upper and lower radius, may be calculated to allow a predetermined number of rotations of the catheter (and thus the off-axis optical fiber).

FIGS. 4A-4D illustrate one variation of a handle including a fiber management pathway having a spool. FIG. 4A shows a longitudinal cross-section through a handle, and an exploded view of the handle, showing the component parts of this example, is illustrated in FIG. 4D. FIGS. 4B and 4C show front and side perspective views, respectively. The catheter body (including the optical fiber therein) extends from the distal end of the handle. In FIGS. 4A-4D, the catheter body is not shown, for simplicity. In this example, a nose region may surround the catheter body, which may rotate therein. The nose may include a support extension 403 that may also provide strain relief as the catheter body attaches to the handle. Proximal to the nose, a rotator assembly 405 may include a control such as a knob (e.g., finger knob 407) that may be rotated to rotate the catheter body. The rotator assembly may including one or more rotation transmission elements, including gears or belts for example for multiplying the rotation of the rotator knob (e.g., 407) by a multiplying factor (typically greater than 1×, e.g., 1.5×, 2×, 3×, 4×, 5×) when rotating the catheter body. The catheter body may be fixed or secured to a hypotube liner that connects to the catheter body, and provides an exit (e.g., window) from which the optical fiber may exit the catheter body and enter the fiber management spool 412. After exiting the fiber spool (e.g., the long helically-wound channel of the spool), the fiber may be secured (anchored, fixed, or pinned) to a location next to or proximal to the spool (e.g., within the handle or outside of the handle). For example, the fiber may attach to a connector for connection to the downstream OCT system (light source, processor, etc.). In some variations, the fiber spool rotates with the catheter body and may be affixed to a rigid length of hypodermic needle tubing (“hypotube”).

FIGS. 4A and 4D illustrate additional elements that may be included, such as a handle housing (which may include an external grip region) 420, a travel or rotation limiter 422, and seals or o-rings 428. The rotation limiter may prevent overturning or rotation of the catheter body beyond the capacity of the fiber management pathway, i.e., to prevent the fiber from being stressed or placed under tension by over-rotation. In some variations, the rotation limiter may be considered part of the fiber management pathway, and may limit the rotation of the catheter body to a pre-determined number of rotations (complete rotations clockwise or counterclockwise). For example, the pre-determined number of rotations may be between 2 and 10 (e.g., about or less than: 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, etc. including partial rotations of these such as half, quarter, tenth, etc. rotations). For example, the handle (e.g., the fiber management and/or rotational control) may be configured with a limiter that limits the number of full rotations of the catheter body through about 5 complete rotations (1800 degrees of rotation).

In the variation of the handle shown in FIGS. 4A-4D, the catheter may be an atherectomy catheter or a guidewire-placement catheter that includes a distal end region that is manipulated to cut or move as the device is advanced or withdrawn. The catheter body (and particularly the distal end region) may also be steerable. Thus, in FIGS. 4A-4D, the distal end may be manipulated by one or more control elements for steering and/or actuating. The handle may also include one or more ports for the application or withdrawal of materials through the catheter (including perfusion fluid, etc). Exemplary elements are labeled (e.g., slider, rotator, fluid seal tube, luer, etc.) in FIG. 4D.

As described in greater detail below, an encoder 425 may also be included to encode the rotational position of the catheter body and/or the optical window or scanning window near the distal end region of the catheter body, from which the OCT images are recreated. Any appropriate encoder may be used.

The length of the handle may be varied, as may the width or girth of the handle. In general, the handle is configured so that it may be easily manipulated by a single hand, including rotation of the finger knob or wheel. In some variations, the handle may be configured for two hands or be held by a peripheral device. The variations of the handles shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 4A-4D are manual handles, in which the catheter body is rotated manually. In some variations, the catheter body is rotated automatically. For example, the catheter body maybe rotated or manipulated electrically. Thus, the handle may also include a motor or driver for rotating the handle, and the handle may include controls (e.g., buttons, sliders, etc.) for controlling the rotation.

FIG. 5 shows a schematic of one variation of a fiber management pathway, including a spool 505. In this example, a catheter body 501 includes an off-axis optical fiber 503. The catheter body is coupled to the spool 505, so that the two rotate together, relative to the outer body of the handle 509. The catheter may include a torque shaft, central lumen, or the like, as mentioned above. The fiber “take off” from the catheter body is controlled to ensure that there are no optical losses, and to prevent stress on the fiber that may lead to breakage. For example, the take off region may be protected by a hypotube liner, as mentioned above. The catheter body may then be skived at a predetermined window location so that the fiber can exit the catheter and enter the spool of the fiber management pathway. The take off region may be configured so that there are no sharp turns (e.g., all bend radii are greater than the threshold bend loss radius of the fiber), while allowing the fiber to coil around the semi-enclosed windings of the spool. In FIG. 5, the spool is shown schematically and forms a helically wound channel with walls having an upper radius 512 and a lower radius 514. The fiber may coil around the spool within the channel. As the catheter body and off-axis optical fiber are rotated relative to the handle, the optical fiber coiled within the spool may expand (shown as dotted lines) and contract (shown as solid lines) with clockwise and counterclockwise rotation of the catheter body. A region of the optical fiber proximal to the spool may be constrained 522 either loosely or tightly so that it may not move laterally (relative to the handle), while still allowing the fiber to wind/unwind and expand/contract within the fiber management spool. Thus, the optical fiber may extend or retract longitudinally as the catheter body is bent, stretched and/or rotated, by expanding or contracting the coils of optical fiber within the spool.

The spool of the fiber management pathway may be configured to allow a pre-determined number of rotations of the catheter body, and may take into account the dimensions of the handle, including the handle length and width. FIGS. 8A-11 describe one method of determining the dimensions of the spool of the fiber management pathway. FIG. 8A illustrates an exemplary helical coil. For any given helical coil, there may be N revolutions, the height of each revolution may be H, the distance from the helix to the center axis may be r (and the circumference, C, is thus 2πr), and the length in one revolution is L, so that N*L is the total length of the helix. An “unrolled” helix may be represented as shown in FIG. 8B, showing that the unrolled helix becomes a repeating line on a plane, which is the hypotenuse of a right triangle having a base length, C, equal to the circumference of the coil (2πr) and a height of one revolution of the helix. From this relationship, the total length of the helix (N*L) can be expressed as: L²=C²+H². Therefore N*L is:

NL=N√{square root over (C²+H²)}

Application of this relationship to various N and C may be expressed and graphed as length versus diameter for different numbers of loops, as shown in FIG. 9. By selecting a desired range of rotations (e.g., between 4 and 5 full rotations), we may use this relationship to determine the internal and external radii of the helical channels of the spool. For example, in FIG. 10, for four rotations (e.g., 10 to 14 coils of fiber on the spool), possible dimensions of the spool channel walls may be determined by extrapolating values (e.g., drawing straight lines) at different values for the fixed length of the optical fiber located on the spool, as shown. Extrapolating from line 1 at N=10, the diameter may be approximately 0.51″, and at N=14, the diameter may be 0.37″ for the same length of optical fiber. This will therefore suggest a spool with an inner diameter (ID) of less than 0.37″ and an outer diameter (OD) of greater than 0.51″. Similarly at line 2, a spool with ID<0.46″ and an OD>0.63″ are suggested.

In practice, some slack must be added back to the spool after a fiber is pulled tight at the higher N_xto be used (where N is the number of windings that the optical fiber takes on the spool, x is the target number of catheter body rotations, and N_x=N+x). FIG. 11 illustrates an example where four rotations are targeted, so the maximum N (N_x) is 23 and the minimum N is 19. The calculated NL curves versus diameter for this scenario are shown in FIG. 11. Applying the analysis above, the suggested OD is 0.75″ and the suggested ID is 0.47″ for the fiber management spool. However, in this example it is desirable to add some optical fiber “slack” back onto the coil, in addition to the necessary NL. For example, approximately 2.75″ of slack may be added to the spool after the fiber is pulled tight at 23 coils. This yields an NL of 36.47″ (NL at 0.47″ is 33.99, plus 2.75″). The dimensions for 23 and 19 coils with a total optical fiber length of 36.74 are therefore an OD(effective) of 0.615″ and an ID(effective) of 0.508″. These effective diameters for the optical fiber within the helical channel would therefore allow the optical fiber to expand and contract during rotation through four turns without hitting either the outer diameter of the channel or the inner diameter of the spool.

Returning now to FIGS. 6A-7D, two variations of the fiber management pathway that may be positioned within the handle are shown. In FIGS. 6A-6D, the spool is shown including the fiber take off region where the fiber exits the catheter (e.g., a fiber lumen off-axis within the catheter) and wraps around the spool's helical channel. The central region of the spool is left hollow, and may be placed in communication with a central passageway of the catheter (and may hold a torque shaft, passageway, etc.). FIG. 6A shows a perspective view of the spool, including a distal region 601 where the fiber exits the catheter body and enters the spool channel, and a middle region 603 comprising the spool channel into which the optical fiber is wound. The channel is a helical winding around the spool, as described above. A proximal region 605 includes a rotation limiter region. A pin or other limiter portion may mate with limiter grooves on the spool, as illustrated in FIG. 6D.

FIGS. 7A-7D shows another variation of a spool having an extended coil design that may further reduce light loss by avoiding tight radius bending while providing sufficient knob rotations. For example, compared to FIGS. 6A-6D, the embodiment shown in FIGS. 7A-7D includes 24 (vs. 15) fiber coils, and has a larger minimum diameter (0.476″ vs. 0.400″) and an increased fiber trench width (0.030″ vs. 0.020″), while the OD remains the same (0.750″±0.001″). The increased number of fiber coils may increase the available amount of slack, enabling one more knob rotation (5 vs. 4), and an increased minimum diameter may keep the optical fiber from being bent too tightly and reduce the amount of light lost when the fiber is in the tightly wound position. Finally the increased fiber trench width may make the spool easier to manufacture, and may also allow help prevent binding as the fiber expands and contracts within the semi-enclosed channel of the spool. The channel is referred to as semi-enclosed, because the upper surface may be open, though in some variations it may be closed (e.g., within a tube or sleeve). In FIGS. 7A-7D, the rotation stop region 703 has also been shifted to the distal end of the spool.

As mentioned above, the handle may also include an encoder to encode rotational information about the catheter body and/or the image-forming window out of the catheter body. An encoder may provide this rotational position information to a processor (including the OCT image processor) for display or calculation of the image based on rotational position. Because a lag may be present between rotation of the distal and proximal ends of the device when rotating from the proximal end of the catheter body, the processor may include logic (including hardware, firmware and/or software) to correct for the lag. FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate different variations of encoders that may be used.

In FIG. 12A, a Hall-effect sensor may be used to detect catheter rotation in the device handle. The rotation can be on- or off-axis. In this variation, an encoder gear mates with a gear that is rotated with the catheter body (in this example, the spool, which is connected to the catheter body, is rotated). A rotary encoder provides output information indicating the rotary position of the catheter body.

FIG. 12B illustrates a schematic of a variation having an on-axis through-hole encoder. In this example, the rotation of the catheter body results in direct rotation of the encoder. FIG. 12C illustrates one example of a non-contact encoder, in which an air gap exists between the encoder sensor and a magnet coupled to the rotary gear that rotates as the catheter body rotates. The sensor may therefore detect rotation. Similarly, FIG. 12D illustrates another version in which a magnetic ring is attached to the rotatable catheter body/spool. The ring may have bands of opposite polarity alternating around the circumference, in which the number of bands is proportional to the angular resolution. Finally, FIG. 12E illustrates another variation, in which there is optical encoding using a disc attached on-axis to the rotatable catheter body or a contiguous element (e.g., the spool). An off-axis optical read head may detect rotation of the disc.

In some variations, the device or a system for using the device incorporates a “mouse chip” position sensor similar to those used in a computer optical mouse in order to look at the catheter and encode angular and longitudinal motion. Other means of position sensing may involve an element or elements of different operating principles, such as a capacitive fingerprint sensor.

A mouse chip may look at the surface of the catheter (or the braid if the outside laminate is transparent or translucent) and on the basis of the difference in feature position between adjacent snap-shots, it calculates the X and Y motion vectors from which we may deduce rotation and/or longitudinal motion. The features being observed by the mouse image sensor can be in any shape or form, and the pattern can be regular/periodic or random. Preferably, the features are not perfectly periodical at the very least. Most preferably, the features are random. There should be at least one discernible feature within the field of view of the mouse image sensor within each successive frame. Incorporation of the chip into an access port may allow removal of the optical encoder from the device, simplifying the device. Alternatively it may allow compensation for imperfect catheter torque transmission. Rotating the proximal end of the catheter by 360 degrees does not necessarily lead to a 360 degree rotation at the distal tip, particularly if the catheter is experiencing distributed friction over its length, for example from the introducer sheath, guides, and/or tissue friction especially in a tight lesion. A significant fraction of the “wind-up” or “lag” between the rotation of the proximal and distal ends of the catheter may come from the unsupported length of catheter between the proximal handle and a Touhy-Borst hemostasis valve. By placing the mouse chip on the “wet” side of the valve, rotation and longitudinal motion of the catheter may be detected while eliminating the unsupported length effect, thereby increasing the precision of measurement.

The mouse chip output (Z, theta) can be displayed on an image display and potentially integrated into a fluoroscopy unit display, as described below. Longitudinal data in particular could be used by the surgeon to measure the length of a lesion, which would in turn guide the cut on/off positions.

Preliminary data indicates that lesions in arteries show clear eccentricity, with almost healthy tissue in one or more quadrants of the vessel transitioning into atheroma, lipid rich regions, calcium deposits etc. The data clearly underscore the need for directional therapy. Thus, the catheters described herein may be used for passage through cardiovascular vessels, and configured to image a wide angle of tissue to millimeter depths, using a single optical fiber configured as a common-path interferometer in an optical coherence tomography sensor.

Any of the catheters described may be used as part of an OCT system including an off-axis optical fiber within the rotatable catheter body. The system may include any of the elements useful for OCT imaging, such as the OCT light source, OCT detector(s) and image processors, which may also include filtering, signal correction and noise reduction.

In some variations, as mentioned above, the optical fiber may be contained within a passage or lumen of the catheter, which is positioned off-axis of the longitudinal axis of the catheter body (e.g., radially displaced from the midline of the catheter). For example, the single optical fiber may be located in a tube that runs the full length of the device. At the distal catheter end, the optical fiber may terminate in a fixed solid transparent material of particular refractive index (which is preferably mis-matched with the refractive index of the optical fiber core in a manner that provides valuable optical properties as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/790,703, Publication No. US-2010-0305452-A1 previously incorporated by reference). Rotation of the catheter body will rotate the distal end region where the optical fiber terminates. At the proximal end, the catheter body can be manually (or automatically) reciprocated/oscillated to cause the distal end to rotate around an azimuthal angle (including multiple complete rotations) while avoiding excessive fiber stress or bend losses and allowing the fiber to be contiguous from the console to the distal tip (no fiber optic rotating junction is necessary). The off-axis rotation of the fiber causes the light beam from the fiber to move through a well-defined azimuthal angle or complete rotation(s) around the vascular interior. At the proximal end, noise and image artifacts can be reduced by using a confocal pinhole optical arrangement that separates the main OCT signal transmitted by the core from any background noise transmitted by the cladding. The resulting OCT signals can be processed to produce panoramic images useful for atherectomy and other applications.

Thus, in some variations, the catheter device for optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis of a distal target includes: a catheter body with a proximal end and a distal end; at least one off-axis optical fiber configured as a common path interferometer disposed along the length of the catheter body; at least one fiber unit having a core, a proximal face, a distal face, and cladding, said core and cladding being contiguous from the connection at the console to the distal catheter tip, and an optically transparent window near the distal end region to which the distal end of the fiber is fixed, allowing radiation to emerge from the tube and impinge on the tissue being imaged at substantially normal incidence. A system including these items may also include an optical radiation source connected at the proximal end of the catheter body by way of a nonreciprocal element and a processor, which may include an optional OCT background correction unit and a detector.

Any of the systems described herein may enable intravascular imaging to determine the extent of a disease (e.g., coronary disease) to be assessed in both the azimuthal and longitudinal positions, and may also allow the identification of disease states (calcium, lipid, atheroma, fibroatheroma). This may in turn allow the treatment to be planned, and a known depth of cut to be superimposed on the image of the disease. Longitudinal and azimuthal indexing may also allow the physician to make a precise estimate of how long a cut should be, whether to take a second cut after a first one, whether the cutting embodiment is facing the disease, and whether the catheter (e.g., cutter) is apposed to the target tissue or in physical contact and therefore more likely to make a cut. Proximal indexing of longitudinal motion coupled with disease/non-disease differentiating imaging may allow the precise length of cut to be planned and executed. This information may be coupled to an automated advancement function of the system to ensure that proximal motion correlates to distal tracking in the vessel and may help prevent the physician from cutting where a cut is not warranted. Directional imaging may allow the catheter, and specifically variations including cutters on the catheter, to be accurately aimed at and apposed to the diseased tissue. Directional imaging may also lead to unambiguous cut/no-cut signals that are difficult to make with fluoroscopy guidance alone, which may help reduce procedure times.

High resolution images of vessel wall morphologies may also be correlated to histologic analysis of excised tissue. This correlation may enable a real-time histologic review of the disease while manipulating the device in the vasculature, which may also make it possible to target specific disease states. In many of the variations of OCT imaging catheters described herein, the devices are capable of resolving an at least 2 mm imaging range that may allow at least one cutter-depths worth of warning of a potential adverse event, for example a perforation. Imaging may also permit the testing of the optimal debulking hypothesis, which proposes a correlation between the volume of diseased tissue removed from the inner lumen of the blood vessel and the long term patency of the vessel. Imaging will show precisely how much tissue has been removed, how much is left, and the treated lumen diameter.

Any of the systems described herein may include an off-axis OCT imaging catheter including a catheter handle with rotation control, cutting control, flush control, and angle/position indexing. An OCT catheter may have an optical fiber that is fixed at a distal position on the elongate catheter body (shaft) and the catheter shaft is allowed to rotate with respect to the proximal handle, although with a well defined number of turns. The optical fiber travels in an off-axis pathway down the length of the rotatable catheter body, and an optical fiber management mechanism in the handle may prevent the fiber from breaking, bending beyond the bend loss threshold, or getting tangled. For example, a single take-up spool in the handle may be used to permit a set number of turns before a physical stop is imposed. The catheter handle, including the fiber management pathway (one embodiment of which is shown in FIG. 5), typically does not require the use of a second take-up spool. The fiber management system incorporates the fiber on a single internal take-up spool. The size of the proximal handle is therefore significantly reduced, as is the complexity.

Any of the catheter devices described herein may include an encoder in the proximal mechanism that detects angle and may constantly relay this information to a processor (e.g., computer) controlling the OCT data acquisition system. The value of the angle may be incorporated into the display algorithm to show a 360 degree view of the inside of the lumen, as illustrated in FIG. 13.

In the image example of FIG. 13, the radial line 1301 denotes the current position of the encoder. The display can be continually refreshed by rotating the catheter in either direction. The whole display can also be rotated and oriented with respect to the fluoroscopic view being acquired simultaneously in the catheter lab. For example, the image may be rotated so that the pericardium is “up” or “down” in the image display. By orienting the display and by knowing the spatial relationship between the cutter position and the display (and by implication, the critical physiological structures in the vessel), the physician may orient the cutter on the device to cut in a safe manner. In the exemplary display shown in FIG. 13, the image is labeled to indicate exemplary structures that may be distinguished by the OCT catheter devices and systems, when used in the vasculature. In addition, as described in more detail below, the image indicates the presence and location of the catheter relative to the surrounding tissue, resulting in an annular display that may accurately reflect the location and orientation of the catheter relative to the tissue.

As can be seen from the above, having a relatively large catheter inside the vessel and having the imaging element disposed on the circumference of this catheter is advantageous as it brings the imaging element into close proximity to the tissue being imaged. There is not a lot of “wasted” imaging distance in the lumen where there would normally be blood. This feature in turn maximizes the imaging range of common path interferometry and reduces the volume of blood to be displaced or trans-illuminated. The catheters in the embodiment have demonstrated an ability to “see” through several hundred microns of blood, significantly better than contemporary designs. It also enables a representative “size” picture of the internal artery structure to be presented. There is little or no NURD—non-uniform rotational distortion—as a result of the relatively large torque shaft having excellent torque transmission properties. This aspect is crucial for accurate cutter guidance (sizing up lesions in both depth and azimuthal extent).

The imaging and image processing using the off-axis OCT catheters described above is discussed in greater detail below.

Alternative variations of the catheters described above may include a motor driving the rotation of the catheter body, and/or the advancement of the catheter longitudinally. For example, a controller can be automated with a motor to drive the rotation of the catheter. Such a controller may be within the handle, or external to the handle. A motorized drive may provide a controlled sector sweep of the imaging element. For example, FIGS. 14A-14B illustrate one variation of a handle having a motor.

Part II: OCT Signal Processing

The OCT images collected by the devices and systems may be displayed in any appropriate manner. For example, the OCT images may be displayed as an “azimuthal view” similar to that shown in the example of FIG. 13, or as a “waterfall view” showing linear scanning from the “one dimensional” OCT scanner at the distal end region of the catheter, or both. Although in the variations described above the OCT imaging scanner (the end of the optical fiber) is shown as near or at the distal end of the catheter, facing perpendicular to the catheter, the OCT imaging scanner may be positioned at any appropriate region of the catheter, including more proximally located positions, and may be oriented more forward-facing or backward-facing (e.g., at a non-90° angle relative to the wall of the catheter).

Images from the catheter can be rendered on the display(s) such that the image remains stationary and a virtual imager position indicates which direction the scanner is pointing around the perimeter of the catheter. This method of rendering the image may be intuitive, providing the sense that the “top” of the image corresponds to the “top” of the vessel or lumen being imaged. In practice, the orientation of the distal end of the catheter may be uncorrelated to the actual “top” or “bottom” of the distal end of the catheter relative to the patient, or it may be correlated.

As an alternate method of rendering the azimuthal image, the system can maintain the virtual imager position in one place (i.e. the “top” of the screen) and rotate the entire image as it is constructed. In a device with a coincident imager and cutter, this may have the advantage of having the cutter always in the “up” position. This view is more akin to riding along with the device and seeing what it would see while in the vessel. In some variations, a pseudo image or marked region may indicate the presence of a cutter or other region or device(s) associated with the catheter near the imaging region.

In some variations of the systems described herein, additional positional or status information on the system may also be displayed in addition to (or alternatively to) the azimuthal and/or waterfall displays of OCT data. For example, in some variations the system may provide information on the longitudinal position or movement of the distal end of the catheter. Movement of the catheter forward/backwards may be represented by a representation of OCT data versus axial distance (e.g., forward/backwards) as the device is moved axially. A similar axial lag (akin to the rotational lag issue mentioned above) may also result, and similar correction methods may be applied.

Lag is a typical problem in rotational catheter system such as those described here. Since a catheter is not an ideal torque transmitting entity, there will be some phase delay (θ) for which the distal end of the catheter does not rotate when the proximal end of the catheter is rotated. This phase delay can cause incorrect orientation of the image when the direction of rotation changes, as well as a smeared sector within the image, and frustration for a user. If the angle θ can be determined, however, the system can keep track of the current position and direction of travel and account for the phase delay when changing directions. Various methods of determining θ to allow for proper orientation of the image will be discussed herein.

One method of determining θ can be referred to as the “overlay” or “side-by-side” mode. In this method, the operator can take one complete rotational scan within the vessel or lumen to be imaged, preferably in a zone with a visible anatomical feature or fiducial mark. The operator can then take a complete rotational scan in the opposite direction at the same physical location. The processor (e.g., logic, such as hardware, software or firmware) then overlays the two images or presents them side-by-side on the display(s). The operator can align the two images by rotating the image using the user interface, which should differ in angle by θ. Once the images are aligned, the software can store θ and use that transparently in subsequent scans to correct the image. This method is illustrated in FIG. 15. In FIG. 15, the azimuthal display shows a radially extending line (upper left) indicating the orientation of the sensor. Overlays of the two images (each of which may be partially transparent with respect to each other) may be manually or automatically performed. A schematic of this method is outlined in FIG. 24.

Another method of correcting for lag uses a fluoroscope or other real-time view of the distal end of the catheter as a guide to determine when torque has been fully transmitted down the shaft. A schematic of this method is outlined in FIG. 25. The catheter body can be rotated until motion is seen on the real-time view. The operator (or an automatic system) can then prepare to determine θ. The catheter body can then be rotated in the opposing direction until motion is again seen or detected on the real-time view. In some variations, the operator then informs the system that the determination is finished. Alternatively, the system may automatically determine this. The difference in angle at the proximal end from the time the procedure started to the time the operator ended it is θ.

Yet another method of determining and/or correcting for lag automates the procedure by detecting motion from scan to scan. If, for example, the catheter is not rotating due to torque build-up, each single line scan should differ from the next by a small value. Using the difference of squares method, or other suitable image comparison algorithm, the system can distinguish motion from non-motion and hence not update the rotational reconstruction of the image while the distal tip is not moving.

All of the above methods can be accompanied by user interface elements that indicate when compensation for θ is occurring. As shown in FIG. 16A, an arc can be displayed along the outside of the sector image. As shown in FIG. 16B, a transparent wedge indicating how much θ remains can be displayed. These methods may or may not include fading, hysteresis, and other means to remove unnecessary distraction from the user while still conveying that windup is being removed instead of active imaging. FIG. 26 show a schematic illustration of this method. The lag correction methods described herein are of particular interest in the off-axis OCT catheters described herein because both the catheter and the optical fiber (producing the OCT image) are being rotated.

As described above, real time imaging information from the catheter can be displayed for the operator. In some embodiments, a substantial proportion of interaction with the system is performed by a technician, and the operator (e.g., physician) is most often a consumer of the data on the display. The technician can annotate the physician's screen image with text and/or simple graphics in a non-destructive way that does not distract from the images on display. FIG. 17 illustrates one example of notes and illustrations that can be overlaid onto the image on display. This may allow the technician to highlight regions of interest, such as anatomy, diseases, etc., in real-time, discuss treatment with the physician, and allow for clearing or storing of the annotations for later review. This could also be useful for other experts outside the sterile field to interact in a precise graphical way with the operating physician.

Because the imaging system described herein is a manual scan device, allowing arbitrary angle positions and sweep ranges, old data may sometime appear on screen if the operator does not scan over previously visited positions. One method for reducing confusion and enhancing the focus on new data is to gradually fade old on-screen image data based either on motion (the more scanning the operator does, the faster the images fade) or on strict time. This highlights the newest data, as it always appears with maximum brightness and opacity, while allowing the old data to still be visible, but easily distinguished.

Depending on the current activity being performed by the physician (i.e. cutting, rotating, etc.) various portions of the data display have different significance. For example, when cutting it may be more advantageous to focus on the “waterfall” (time vs. depth) display. When targeting, it can be more useful to focus on the sector (two dimensional azimuthal) display. Using a variety of sensors, the system can deduce the action and automatically highlight or enlarge the appropriate display for the situation. When cutter actuation is detected the waterfall portion of the display can be enlarged and the sector display can be reduced, for example. These different displays may be advantageous because they may optimally allow a users own natural edge-detection to discern features from the otherwise one-dimensional information. In some variations, additional signal processing may also be applied to detect or determine features from these OCT images. For example, tissue boundaries may be determine or detected, and indicated on one or more of the displays.

The systems described herein may also automatically or manually toggle between the one or more display types, or may emphasize one or more of the display types. For example, if the system is being used to modify tissue (e.g., cut tissue using an atherectomy element), the waterfall display (which may more easily allow detection of the tissue boundaries) may be enhanced by showing it larger than the azimuthal display, or by showing just the waterfall display. This may be done automatically if the controller indicates that the user will be (or is) using the atherectomy element(s), or it may be done manually before the user selects it.

When displaying the OCT data, the system described herein may correct for various sources of error. For example, one source of error arises because the sensor (OCT imager) is positioned at the outer edge of a rotating catheter. A naïve rendering implementation might draw the sector image from the very center outward (e.g., so that the azimuthal display is more of a circle than a toroid). This depiction would, however, be completely artificial, and result in the features toward the center appearing pinched. While this distortion has no impact on the assessment of depth of features, any decisions based on morphology in the azimuthal direction could be effected by the resulting underestimation of their size. Since the catheters used herein have a known diameter and image position, the system can take this into account when rendering by remapping the origin of the polar coordinates to a new radius and scaling the entire image to fit within the field of view of the display. This ensures that tissue morphology is correctly represented. FIG. 18A represents an uncorrected image, and FIG. 18B illustrates the same image after correction for the diameter of the catheter (or radial position of the OCT sensor relative to the catheter central axis). In other embodiments, the exact imager position can be encoded into an RFID or other non-volatile memory associated with the catheter to automate the configuration.

A second source of error may arise in the scanning system. It is possible that the depth vs. sample number mapping could be nonlinear, resulting in some radial distortion in the image. By characterizing each system at manufacturing time, a mapping of sample number to depth can be constructed and the system can correct for any non-linearity during rendering. FIGS. 27A-27C schematically illustrate various methods for correcting the image to adjust the scaling as described above.

Overlaying an artificial indicator at a fixed depth from a tissue interface would enable pre and post-cut depth evaluation, comparison of normal healthy tissue morphology to actual image appearance, and possibly other applications.

As mentioned above, a software approach can be implemented that detects tissue boundaries (and particularly the intimal boundary of a blood vessel) by searching each scan line for a sharp peak in the first portion of the scan. Each peak position can be averaged together to reduce noise. Those averaged values can then be added to a fixed configurable offset (indicating cutter depth, statistical average media depth, etc.) and an indicator can superimposed on the image at that new position. FIG. 19 illustrates an indicator superimposed over the image corresponding to a desired tissue depth to be monitored. It can be seen from FIG. 19 that the depth indicator is superimposed on both the sector scan image (the top image in FIG. 19) and the waterfall image (the bottom image in FIG. 19).

Visualizing the adventitia is one key to a successful outcome in image guided atherectomy. It can be difficult in some instances to distinguish from noise or other layers, depending on image quality. Using image processing techniques, it is possible to enhance the visibility of the layer structure, making the adventitia easier to pick out.

One method for enhancing the image uses a non-linear contrast stretch to “pull-apart” layers of different reflectivity. The operator can adjust the mapping of input gray level to output gray level in a way that emphasizes small differences in intensities. FIG. 20A illustrates a normal image and FIG. 20B illustrates the same image after applying an aggressive contrast stretch technique to enhance the image. FIG. 21 shows the contrast curve used to achieve the contrast stretched image of FIG. 20B.

Another method for enhancing the image attempts to detect the layer structure directly and overlay or highlight “bright” layers by overlaying a color or other transparent indicator on the image. The difference of Gaussian's approach can be used to find bright layers. Once the image has been processed to find layers, it can be superimposed over the raw image in a new transparent color. FIG. 22 shows an image where the bright layers have been highlighted.

In some embodiments, when an event takes place (such as a capture, cutter activation, lag calibration, etc.) the system can automatically store in a meta-data file the time and type of event. In addition, the tag information can be superimposed on the waterfall (time vs. depth) display. This allows real-time marking of disease structure, cut starts and ends, and other events. FIG. 23 shows a waterfall image superimposed with tag information. As the events are stored on disk, they will appear on the waterfall during playback, providing easier interpretation of the display.

Other methods for improving image quality will now be discussed. Given a very phase stable laser as part of the imaging system, it is possible to average several immediately consecutive line scans prior to the inverse Fourier transform. Empirical results suggest that this lowers the noise floor without impacting the signal level. If the laser is not phase stable, or if the lines differ in phase from some other source (high-speed motion, for example), destructive interference may occur which could impact the signal level. A mitigation of this effect can be performed by cross-correlating or otherwise differencing the consecutive lines to evaluate similarity. Lines which differ too greatly from the other in the averaging set could be discarded so as not to impinge on the final result. The effect of this averaging procedure is to virtually increase the laser power without actually delivering more power to the tissue. FIG. 28 schematically illustrates one variation of a method for reducing noise by FFT averaging of the signal(s).

In an alternative embodiment related to the averaging procedure discussed above, several of the averaged line results can be bundled together and further averaged together after the transform. This has the empirical effect of reducing speckle noise in the image. This procedure is more computationally intense, and may slow the effective scan rate more dramatically than averaging consecutive line scans alone. Post-FFT averaging has no requirement for phase stability however, as it is performed in the intensity domain. High-speed motion may produce blurring, but not destructive interference effects. FIG. 29 outlines one variation of the post-FFT averaging method described above.

Additional details pertinent to the present invention, including materials and manufacturing techniques, may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims

1. A system for imaging a body lumen, the system including: a controller configured to connect to a proximal end of a catheter having a common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber extending off-axis along the length of an elongate catheter body relative to the catheter body, the controller configured to: acquire a first optical coherence tomography (OCT) image by rotating a distal end of the common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber a single rotation in a first direction;acquire a second OCT image by rotating the distal end of the common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber a single rotation in a second direction;determine an angle of rotational difference between the first OCT image and the second OCT image;acquire a plurality of OCT images of the body lumen as the distal end of the common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber rotates alternately a predetermined number of rotations in the first direction and a predetermined number of rotations in the second direction; androtationally adjust one or more of the plurality of OCT images of the body lumen by the angle of rotational difference after each change in direction that occurs during the alternating predetermined number of rotations; anda display configured to display the one or more adjusted OCT images of the body lumen at a constant orientation relative to the body lumen even as the common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber rotates alternately in the first and second directions, the display further including an indicator configured to indicate which direction the distal end of the common path optical coherence tomography optical fiber is pointing around a perimeter of the catheter body.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second predetermined number of rotations each comprise at least 360 degrees.
3. A system for imaging a body lumen, the system including: a controller configured to connect to a proximal end of a catheter, the catheter including an elongate catheter body and an imaging sensor proximate to a distal end of the elongate catheter body, the controller configured to: acquire a first optical coherence tomography (OCT) image by rotating a distal tip of the catheter and the imaging sensor relative to the elongate catheter body in a first direction;acquire a second OCT image by rotating the distal tip of the catheter and the imaging sensor relative to the elongate catheter body in a second direction;determine an angle of rotational difference between the first OCT image and the second OCT image;acquire a plurality of OCT images of the body lumen as the distal tip of the catheter and the imaging sensor rotates alternately in the first direction and the second direction; androtationally adjust one or more of the plurality of OCT images by the angle of rotational difference after each change in direction; anda display configured to display the one or more adjusted OCT images of the body lumen at a constant orientation relative to the body lumen even as the imaging sensor rotates alternately in the first and second directions.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the controller is further configured to store the angle of rotational difference for correction of additional OCT images.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the imaging sensor is an optical fiber extending off-axis at a distal end of the catheter.
6. The system of claim 3, wherein acquiring a plurality of OCT images of the body lumen as the imaging sensor rotates alternately in the first direction and the second direction comprises acquiring the plurality of OCT images as the imaging sensor rotates alternately a predetermined number of rotations in the first direction and a predetermined number of rotations in the second direction.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the first and second predetermined number of rotations each comprise at least 360 degrees.
8. A system for imaging a body lumen, the system including: a controller configured to connect to a proximal end of a catheter, the catheter having an elongate catheter body and an imaging sensor proximate to a distal end of the elongate catheter body, the controller configured to: receive a first optical coherence tomography (OCT) image comprising a circumferential view of a lumen acquired by rotating the imaging sensor at least 360 degrees in a first direction, wherein rotating a distal end of the imaging sensor causes the imaging sensor to wind around a central lumen of the elongate catheter body in the first direction;receive a second OCT image comprising a circumferential view of a lumen acquired by rotating the imaging sensor at least 360 degrees in a second direction, wherein rotating the distal end of the imaging sensor causes the imaging sensor to wind around the central lumen in the second direction;determine a rotational lag of the imaging sensor based upon an angle of rotational difference required to align orientations of the first and second OCT images;acquire a plurality of subsequent OCT images of the body lumen as the distal end of the imaging sensor rotates and the imaging sensor winds around the central lumen; androtationally correct one or more of the plurality of subsequent OCT images by the angle of rotational difference; anda display configured to display the one or more of the plurality of subsequent OCT images of the body lumen corrected for the rotational lag, the display further including an indicator configured to indicate which direction the imaging sensor is pointing around a perimeter of the catheter body.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the display is configured to display the one or more of the plurality of subsequent OCT images at a substantially constant orientation.
10. The system of claim 8, wherein the display is configured to indicate which rotational direction the imaging sensor is rotating.
11. The system of claim 8, wherein the imaging sensor is an optical fiber extending off-axis at a distal end of the elongate catheter body.
12. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more of the plurality of subsequent OCT images are acquired as the distal end of the imaging sensor rotates alternately a predetermined number of rotations in the first direction and a predetermined number of rotations in the second direction.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/829,267, titled “CATHETER-BASED OFF-AXIS OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING SYSTEM,” filed on Jul. 1, 2010, Publication No. US-2010-0021926-A1, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/222,238, titled “CATHETER FOR INTRALUMINAL CIRCUMFERENTIAL IMAGING WITH ROTATION ANGLE AND LONGITUDINAL POSITION ENCODING,” filed on Jul. 1, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/244,408, titled “CATHETER-BASED OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING SYSTEM” and filed on Sep. 21, 2009 and U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/258,100, titled “CATHETER PROXIMAL END EMBODIMENTS FOR INTRALUMINAL CIRCUMFERENTIAL IMAGING WITH ROTATION ANGLE AND LONGITUDINAL POSITION ENCODING” and filed on Nov. 4, 2009, each of which is herein incorporated by reference its entirety. This application may also be related to pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/790,703, titled “OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FOR BIOLOGICAL IMAGING,” filed on May 28, 2010, Publication No. US-2010-0305452-A1 which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (435)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3908637	Doroshow	Sep 1975	A
4178935	Gekhaman et al.	Dec 1979	A
4487206	Aagard	Dec 1984	A
4527553	Upsher	Jul 1985	A
4552554	Gould et al.	Nov 1985	A
4611600	Cohen	Sep 1986	A
4621353	Hazel et al.	Nov 1986	A
4639091	Huignard et al.	Jan 1987	A
4654024	Crittenden et al.	Mar 1987	A
4686982	Nash	Aug 1987	A
4691708	Kane	Sep 1987	A
4771774	Simpson et al.	Sep 1988	A
4841977	Griffith et al.	Jun 1989	A
4857046	Stevens et al.	Aug 1989	A
4920961	Grossi et al.	May 1990	A
4926858	Gifford, III et al.	May 1990	A
5000185	Yock	Mar 1991	A
5018529	Tenerz et al.	May 1991	A
5041082	Shiber	Aug 1991	A
5047040	Simpson et al.	Sep 1991	A
5085662	Willard	Feb 1992	A
5099850	Matsui	Mar 1992	A
5178153	Einzig	Jan 1993	A
5182291	Gubin et al.	Jan 1993	A
5190050	Nitzsche	Mar 1993	A
5192291	Pannek, Jr.	Mar 1993	A
5312415	Palermo	May 1994	A
5312425	Evans et al.	May 1994	A
5321501	Swanson et al.	Jun 1994	A
5333142	Scheps	Jul 1994	A
5358472	Vance et al.	Oct 1994	A
5366464	Belknap	Nov 1994	A
5383460	Jang et al.	Jan 1995	A
5383467	Auer et al.	Jan 1995	A
5425273	Chevalier	Jun 1995	A
5429136	Milo et al.	Jul 1995	A
5431673	Summers et al.	Jul 1995	A
5437284	Trimble	Aug 1995	A
5459570	Swanson et al.	Oct 1995	A
5460168	Masubuchi et al.	Oct 1995	A
5465147	Swanson	Nov 1995	A
5507795	Chiang et al.	Apr 1996	A
5517998	Madison	May 1996	A
5556405	Lary	Sep 1996	A
5607394	Andersen et al.	Mar 1997	A
5620426	Braithwaite	Apr 1997	A
5632754	Farley et al.	May 1997	A
5632755	Nordgren et al.	May 1997	A
5674232	Halliburton	Oct 1997	A
5681336	Clement et al.	Oct 1997	A
5690634	Muller et al.	Nov 1997	A
5722403	McGee et al.	Mar 1998	A
5728148	Bostrom et al.	Mar 1998	A
5795295	Hellmuth et al.	Aug 1998	A
5807339	Bostrom et al.	Sep 1998	A
5830145	Tenhoff	Nov 1998	A
5836957	Schulz et al.	Nov 1998	A
5843050	Jones et al.	Dec 1998	A
5843103	Wulfman	Dec 1998	A
5868778	Gershony et al.	Feb 1999	A
5872879	Hamm	Feb 1999	A
5904651	Swanson et al.	May 1999	A
5907425	Dickensheets et al.	May 1999	A
5935075	Casscells et al.	Aug 1999	A
5938602	Lloyd	Aug 1999	A
5951482	Winston et al.	Sep 1999	A
5951581	Saadat et al.	Sep 1999	A
5951583	Jensen et al.	Sep 1999	A
5956355	Swanson et al.	Sep 1999	A
5957952	Gershony et al.	Sep 1999	A
5987995	Sawatari et al.	Nov 1999	A
5997558	Nash	Dec 1999	A
6001112	Taylor	Dec 1999	A
6007530	Dornhofer et al.	Dec 1999	A
6010449	Selmon et al.	Jan 2000	A
6013072	Winston et al.	Jan 2000	A
6017359	Gershony et al.	Jan 2000	A
6027514	Stine et al.	Feb 2000	A
6032673	Savage et al.	Mar 2000	A
6048349	Winston et al.	Apr 2000	A
6080170	Nash et al.	Jun 2000	A
6106515	Winston et al.	Aug 2000	A
6110164	Vidlund	Aug 2000	A
6120515	Rogers et al.	Sep 2000	A
6120516	Selmon et al.	Sep 2000	A
6134002	Stimson et al.	Oct 2000	A
6134003	Tearney et al.	Oct 2000	A
6152938	Curry	Nov 2000	A
6152951	Hashimoto et al.	Nov 2000	A
6160826	Swanson et al.	Dec 2000	A
6175669	Colston et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6176871	Pathak et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6183432	Milo	Feb 2001	B1
6193676	Winston et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6206898	Honeycutt et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6228076	Winston et al.	May 2001	B1
6241744	Imran et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6283957	Hashimoto et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6290668	Gregory et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6294775	Seibel et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6299622	Snow et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6307985	Murakami et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6402719	Ponzi et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6416527	Berg et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6445939	Swanson et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6445944	Ostrovsky	Sep 2002	B1
6447525	Follmer et al.	Sep 2002	B2
6451036	Heitzmann et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6454717	Pantages et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6454779	Taylor	Sep 2002	B1
6482216	Hiblar et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6482217	Pintor et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6485413	Boppart et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6497649	Parker et al.	Dec 2002	B2
6501551	Tearney et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6503261	Bruneau et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6511458	Milo et al.	Jan 2003	B2
6517528	Patages et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6542665	Reed et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6544230	Flaherty et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6546272	MacKinnon et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6551302	Rosinko et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6563105	Seibel et al.	May 2003	B2
6564087	Pitris et al.	May 2003	B1
6565588	Clement et al.	May 2003	B1
6572563	Ouchi et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6572643	Gharibadeh	Jun 2003	B1
6575995	Huter et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6579298	Bruneau et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6615071	Casscells, III et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6638233	Corvi et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6645217	MacKinnon et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6657727	Izatt et al.	Dec 2003	B1
6666874	Heitzmann et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6687010	Horii	Feb 2004	B1
6728571	Barbato	Apr 2004	B1
D489973	Root et al.	May 2004	S
6730063	Delaney et al.	May 2004	B2
6758854	Butler et al.	Jul 2004	B1
6760112	Reed et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6800085	Selmon et al.	Oct 2004	B2
6818001	Wulfman et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6824550	Noriega et al.	Nov 2004	B1
6830577	Nash et al.	Dec 2004	B2
6845190	Smithwick et al.	Jan 2005	B1
6852109	Winston et al.	Feb 2005	B2
6853457	Bjarklev et al.	Feb 2005	B2
6856712	Fauver et al.	Feb 2005	B2
6867753	Chinthammit et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6879851	McNamara et al.	Apr 2005	B2
6947787	Webler	Sep 2005	B2
6961123	Wang et al.	Nov 2005	B1
6970732	Winston et al.	Nov 2005	B2
6975898	Seibel	Dec 2005	B2
7068878	Crossman-Bosworth et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7074231	Jang	Jul 2006	B2
7126693	Everett et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7172610	Heitzmann et al.	Feb 2007	B2
7242480	Alphonse	Jul 2007	B2
7261687	Yang	Aug 2007	B2
7288087	Winston et al.	Oct 2007	B2
7291146	Steinke et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7297131	Nita	Nov 2007	B2
7311723	Seibel et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7344546	Wulfman et al.	Mar 2008	B2
7366376	Shishkov et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7382949	Bouma et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7426036	Feldchtein et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7428001	Schowengerdt et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7428053	Feldchtein et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7455649	Root et al.	Nov 2008	B2
7474407	Gutin	Jan 2009	B2
7485127	Nistal	Feb 2009	B2
7488340	Kauphusman et al.	Feb 2009	B2
7530948	Seibel et al.	May 2009	B2
7530976	MacMahon et al.	May 2009	B2
7538859	Tearney et al.	May 2009	B2
7538886	Feldchtein	May 2009	B2
7539362	Teramura	May 2009	B2
7542145	Toida et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7544162	Ohkubo	Jun 2009	B2
7545504	Buckland et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7555333	Wang et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7577471	Camus et al.	Aug 2009	B2
7583872	Seibel et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7616986	Seibel et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7637885	Maschke	Dec 2009	B2
7674253	Fisher et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7682319	Martin et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7706863	Imanishi et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7728985	Feldchtein et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7729745	Maschke	Jun 2010	B2
7734332	Sher	Jun 2010	B2
7738945	Fauver et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7753852	Maschke	Jul 2010	B2
7771425	Dycus et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7785286	Magnin et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7813609	Petersen et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7821643	Amazeen et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7824089	Charles	Nov 2010	B2
7840283	Bush et al.	Nov 2010	B1
7944568	Teramura et al.	May 2011	B2
7952718	Li et al.	May 2011	B2
7972299	Carter et al.	Jul 2011	B2
8059274	Splinter	Nov 2011	B2
8062316	Patel et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8068921	Prakash et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8313493	Fisher	Nov 2012	B2
8361097	Patel et al.	Jan 2013	B2
8548571	He et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8548603	Swoyer et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8632557	Thatcher et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8647335	Markus	Feb 2014	B2
8911459	Simpson et al.	Dec 2014	B2
9119662	Moberg	Sep 2015	B2
9333007	Escudero et al.	May 2016	B2
20010020126	Swanson et al.	Sep 2001	A1
20020019644	Hastings et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020072706	Hiblar et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020082626	Donohoe et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020111548	Swanson et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020115931	Strauss et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020147459	Bashiri et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020158547	Wood	Oct 2002	A1
20030002038	Mawatari	Jan 2003	A1
20030028100	Tearney et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030032880	Moore	Feb 2003	A1
20030045835	Anderson et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030095248	Frot	May 2003	A1
20030097044	Rovegno	May 2003	A1
20030120150	Govari	Jun 2003	A1
20030120295	Simpson et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030125756	Shturman et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030125757	Patel et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030125758	Simpson et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030139751	Evans et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030181855	Simpson et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20040002650	Mandrusov et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040039371	Tockman et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040057667	Yamada et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040059257	Gaber	Mar 2004	A1
20040082850	Bonner et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040092915	Levatter	May 2004	A1
20040093001	Hamada	May 2004	A1
20040147934	Kiester	Jul 2004	A1
20040167553	Simpson et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040167554	Simpson et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040181249	Torrance et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040186368	Ramzipoor et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040202418	Ghiron et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040220519	Wulfman et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040230212	Wulfman	Nov 2004	A1
20040230213	Wulfman et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040236312	Nistal et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040243162	Wulfman et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040254599	Lipoma et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040260236	Manning et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050020925	Kleen et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050043614	Huizenga et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050054947	Goldenberg	Mar 2005	A1
20050075660	Chu et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050085708	Fauver et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050085721	Fauver et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050105097	Fang-Yen et al.	May 2005	A1
20050141843	Warden et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050154407	Simpson	Jul 2005	A1
20050159712	Andersen	Jul 2005	A1
20050159731	Lee	Jul 2005	A1
20050171478	Selmon et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050177068	Simpson	Aug 2005	A1
20050182295	Soper et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050187571	Maschke	Aug 2005	A1
20050192496	Maschke	Sep 2005	A1
20050201662	Petersen et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050203553	Maschke	Sep 2005	A1
20050222519	Simpson	Oct 2005	A1
20050222663	Simpson et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050251116	Steinke et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20060011820	Chow-Shing et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060032508	Simpson	Feb 2006	A1
20060046235	Alexander	Mar 2006	A1
20060049587	Cornwell	Mar 2006	A1
20060064009	Webler et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060084911	Belef et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060109478	Tearney et al.	May 2006	A1
20060135870	Webler	Jun 2006	A1
20060173475	Lafontaine et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060229646	Sparks	Oct 2006	A1
20060229659	Gifford et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060235262	Arnal et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060235366	Simpson	Oct 2006	A1
20060236019	Soito et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060239982	Simpson	Oct 2006	A1
20060241503	Schmitt et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060244973	Yun et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060252993	Freed et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060264741	Prince	Nov 2006	A1
20060264743	Kleen et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060264907	Eskridge et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20070010840	Rosenthal et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070015969	Feldman et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070015979	Redel	Jan 2007	A1
20070035855	Dickensheets	Feb 2007	A1
20070038061	Huennekens et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070038125	Kleen et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070038173	Simpson	Feb 2007	A1
20070078469	Soito et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070078500	Ryan	Apr 2007	A1
20070081166	Brown et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070088230	Terashi et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070106155	Goodnow	May 2007	A1
20070135712	Maschke	Jun 2007	A1
20070196926	Soito et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070219484	Straub	Sep 2007	A1
20070250080	Jones et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070255252	Mehta	Nov 2007	A1
20070270647	Nahen et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070276419	Rosenthal	Nov 2007	A1
20070288036	Seshadri	Dec 2007	A1
20070299309	Seibel et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080004643	To et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080004644	To et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080004645	To et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080004646	To et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080015491	Bei et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080027334	Langston	Jan 2008	A1
20080033396	Danek et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080045986	To et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080049234	Seitz	Feb 2008	A1
20080058629	Seibel et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080065124	Olson	Mar 2008	A1
20080065125	Olson	Mar 2008	A1
20080065205	Nguyen et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080103439	Torrance et al.	May 2008	A1
20080103446	Torrance et al.	May 2008	A1
20080103516	Wulfman et al.	May 2008	A1
20080139897	Ainsworth et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080146942	Dala-Krishna	Jun 2008	A1
20080147000	Seibel et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080154293	Taylor et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080177138	Courtney	Jul 2008	A1
20080186501	Xie	Aug 2008	A1
20080221388	Seibel et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080228033	Tumlinson et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080243030	Seibel et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080243031	Seibel et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080262312	Carroll et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080275485	Bonnette et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20090018565	To et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090018566	Escudero et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090018567	Escudero et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090024084	Khosla et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090024085	To et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090024191	Seibel et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090028407	Seibel	Jan 2009	A1
20090028507	Jones et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090073444	Wang	Mar 2009	A1
20090093764	Pfeffer et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090099641	Wu et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090125019	Douglass et al.	May 2009	A1
20090135280	Johnston et al.	May 2009	A1
20090137893	Seibel et al.	May 2009	A1
20090152664	Tian et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090185135	Volk	Jul 2009	A1
20090196554	Irisawa	Aug 2009	A1
20090198125	Nakabayashi et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090208143	Yoon et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090216180	Lee et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090221904	Shealy et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090221920	Boppart et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090235396	Wang et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090244485	Walsh et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090244547	Ozawa	Oct 2009	A1
20090264826	Thompson	Oct 2009	A1
20090284749	Johnson et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090292199	Bielewicz et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090306520	Schmitt et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090316116	Melville	Dec 2009	A1
20090318862	Ali et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100021926	Noordin	Jan 2010	A1
20100049225	To et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100080016	Fukui et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100125253	Olson	May 2010	A1
20100130996	Doud et al.	May 2010	A1
20100241147	Maschke	Sep 2010	A1
20100253949	Adler et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100274270	Patel et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100292539	Lankenau et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100292721	Moberg	Nov 2010	A1
20100305452	Black et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100312263	Moberg et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100317973	Nita	Dec 2010	A1
20100324472	Wulfman	Dec 2010	A1
20110004107	Rosenthal et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110021926	Spencer et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110023617	Miao et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110028977	Rauscher et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110040238	Wulfman et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110058250	Liu et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110060186	Tilson et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110071401	Hastings et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110092955	Purdy et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20110106004	Eubanks et al.	May 2011	A1
20110118660	Torrance et al.	May 2011	A1
20110130777	Zhang et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110144673	Zhang et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110201924	Tearney	Aug 2011	A1
20110208222	Ljahnicky et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110257478	Kleiner et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110264125	Wilson et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110270187	Nelson	Nov 2011	A1
20110295148	Destoumieux et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110301625	Mauch et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110319905	Palme et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120002928	Irisawa	Jan 2012	A1
20120004506	Tearney et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120046679	Patel et al.	Feb 2012	A1
20120238869	Schmitt et al.	Sep 2012	A1
20120253186	Simpson et al.	Oct 2012	A1
20130096589	Spencer et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130123615	Spencer et al.	May 2013	A1
20130138128	Patel et al.	May 2013	A1
20160008025	Gupta et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160029902	Smith et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160038030	Smith et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160262791	Patel et al.	Sep 2016	A1
20160262839	Spencer et al.	Sep 2016	A1
20160338582	Tachibana et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20170065293	Rosenthal et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20170065295	Patel et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20180049700	Black et al.	Feb 2018	A1
20180192880	Patel et al.	Jul 2018	A1
20180207417	Zung et al.	Jul 2018	A1
20180256039	Smith et al.	Sep 2018	A1
20180256187	Patel et al.	Sep 2018	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (72)

Number	Date	Country
1875242	Dec 2006	CN
1947652	Apr 2007	CN
101601581	Dec 2009	CN
202006018883.5	Feb 2007	DE
0347098	Dec 1989	EP
0808638	Nov 1997	EP
0845692	Nov 2005	EP
1859732	Nov 2007	EP
2353526	Sep 2013	EP
S62-275425	Nov 1987	JP
03502060	Feb 1990	JP
05103763	Apr 1993	JP
H06-027343	Feb 1994	JP
H07-308393	Nov 1995	JP
2002-214127	Jul 2002	JP
2004-509695	Apr 2004	JP
2004-516073	Jun 2004	JP
2005-114473	Apr 2005	JP
2005-249704	Sep 2005	JP
2005230550	Sep 2005	JP
2005-533533	Nov 2005	JP
2008-175698	Jul 2006	JP
2006-288775	Oct 2006	JP
2006-313158	Nov 2006	JP
2006-526790	Nov 2006	JP
2006-326157	Dec 2006	JP
2007-83053	Apr 2007	JP
2007-83057	Apr 2007	JP
2007-225349	Sep 2007	JP
2007533361	Nov 2007	JP
2008-023627	Feb 2008	JP
2008-128708	Jun 2008	JP
2008-145376	Jun 2008	JP
2008-183208	Aug 2008	JP
2008-253492	Oct 2008	JP
2009-14751	Jan 2009	JP
2009-509690	Mar 2009	JP
2009-66252	Apr 2009	JP
2009-78150	Apr 2009	JP
2010042182	Feb 2010	JP
2010518900	Jun 2010	JP
2011521747	Jul 2011	JP
2012533353	Dec 2012	JP
20070047221	May 2007	KR
2185859	Jul 2002	RU
2218191	Dec 2003	RU
WO 9117698	Nov 1991	WO
WO 9923958	May 1999	WO
WO 0054659	Sep 2000	WO
WO0115609	Mar 2001	WO
WO 0176680	Oct 2001	WO
WO 2006133030	Dec 2006	WO
WO2008005888	Jan 2008	WO
WO 2008029506	Mar 2008	WO
WO 2008042987	Apr 2008	WO
WO2008051951	May 2008	WO
WO2008065600	Jun 2008	WO
WO 2008086613	Jul 2008	WO
WO 2008087613	Jul 2008	WO
WO2009005779	Jan 2009	WO
WO2009006335	Jan 2009	WO
WO 2009009799	Jan 2009	WO
WO2009009802	Jan 2009	WO
WO 2009023635	Feb 2009	WO
WO2009024344	Feb 2009	WO
WO 2009094341	Jul 2009	WO
WO 2009140617	Nov 2009	WO
WO2009148317	Dec 2009	WO
WO2010039464	Apr 2010	WO
WO2010056771	May 2010	WO
WO2011044387	Apr 2011	WO
WO2011062087	May 2011	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (44)

Entry
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,583 entitled “Occlusion-Crossing Devices, Imaging, and Atherectomy Devices,” filed Feb. 3, 2014.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,266 entitled “Re-entry stylet for catheter,” filed Feb. 26, 2015.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,277 entitled “Balloon atherectomy catheters with imaging,” filed Feb. 26, 2015.
Newhauser et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/433,786 entitled “Occusion-crossing devices,” filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Aziz et al.; Chronic total occlusions—a stiff challege requiring a major breakthrough: is there light at the end of the tunnel?; Heart; vol. 91; suppl. III; pp. 42-48; Jun. 2005.
Emkey et al.; Analysis and evaluation of graded-index fiber-lenses; Journal of Lightwave Technology; vol. LT-5; No. 9; pp. 1156-1164; Sep. 1987.
Linares et al.; Arbitrary single-mode coupling by tapered and nontapered grin fiber lenses; Applied Optics; vol. 29; No. 28; pp. 4003-4007; Oct. 1, 1990.
Sharma et al.; Optical coherence tomography based on an all-fiber autocorrelator using probe-end reflection as reference; CWJ13; San Francisco, California; CLEO May 16, 2004; 4 pages.
Suparno et al.; Light scattering with single-mode fiber collimators; Applied Optics; vol. 33; No. 30; pp. 7200-7205; Oct. 20, 1994.
Han et al.; In situ Frog Retina Imaging Using Common-Path OCT with a Gold-Coated Bare Fiber Probe; CFM6; San Jose, California; CLEO, May 4, 2008; 2 pages.
Muller et al.; Time-gated infrared fourier-domain optical coherence tomography; CFMS; San Jose, California; CLEO May 4, 2008; 2 pages.
Wang et al.; Common-path endoscopic Fourier domain OCT with a reference Michelson interferometer; Proceedings of the SPIE; vol. 7566; pp. 75660L-75660L-7; Jan. 2010.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/929,579 entitled “Guidewire Positioning Catheter,” filed Jun. 27, 2013.
He et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,466 entitled “Devices and Methods for Predicting and Preventing Restenosis,” filed Sep. 5, 2013.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/072,272 entitled “Atherectomy catheters devices having multi-channel bushings,” filed Mar. 16, 2016.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/076,568 entitled “Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices,” filed Mar. 21, 2016.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/899,877 entitled “Occusion sheath for imaging catheter,” filed Dec. 18, 2015.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/899,893 entitled “Identification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy,” filed Dec. 18, 2015.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/324,325 entitled “High speed chronic total occulusion crossing devices,” filed Jan. 6, 2017.
Kankaria; U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,815 entitled “Optical coherence tomography with graded index fiber for biological imaging,” filed Jan. 30, 2017.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/434,758 entitled “Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices,” filed Feb. 16, 2017.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/457,960 entitled “Atherectomy catheters devices having multi-channel bushings,” filed Mar. 13, 2017.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/480,238 entitled “Guidewire positioning catheter,” filed Apr. 5, 2017.
Fernandez et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/305,136 entitled “Catheter device with detachable distal end,” filed Nov. 28, 2018.
Patel et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/310,470 entitled “Atherectomy catheter with shapeable distal tip,” filed Dec. 17, 2019.
Simpson et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/194,183 entitled “Indetification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy,” filed Nov. 16, 2018.
Newhauser et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,407 entitled “Occlusion-crossing devices,” filed Apr. 16, 2018**.
Christensen; U.S. Appl. No. 16/069,545 entitled “Oct imaging catheter with lag correction,” filed Jul. 12, 2018**.
Rosenthal et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,743 entitled “Atherectomy catheter with laterally-displaceable tip,” filed Aug. 20, 2018**.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/148,246 entitled “Atherectomy catheter with serrated cutter,” filed Oct. 1, 2018**.
Choma et al.; Sensitivity advantage of swept source and fourier domain optical coherence tomography; Optics Express; 11(18); pp. 2183-2189; Sep. 8, 2003.
De Boer et al.; Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography; Optics Letters; 28(21); pp. 2067-2069; Nov. 2003.
Leitgeb et al.; Performance of fourier domain vs time domain optical coherence tomography; Optics Express; 11(8); pp. 889-894; Apr. 21, 2003.
Rollins et al.; Optimal interferometer designs for optical coherence tomography; Optics Letters; 24(21); pp. 1484-1486; Nov. 1999.
Tachibana et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/372,112 entitled “Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies,” filed Apr. 1, 2019.
Radjabi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/347,840 entitled “Methods, systems and apparatuses for displaying real-time catheter position,” filed May 7, 2019.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/490,903 entitled “Atherctomy catheter,” filed Jul. 2, 2019.
Black et al; U.S. Appl. No. 16/506,851 entitled “Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging,” filed Jul. 9, 2019.
Patel et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/516,093 entitled “High speed chronic total occlusion crossing devices,” filed Jul. 18, 2019.
Gonzalo et al.; Optical coherence tomography patterns of stent restenosis; Am. Heart J.; 158(2); pp. 284-293; Aug. 2009.
Tanaka et al.; Challenges on the frontier of intracoronary imaging: atherosclerotic plaque macrophage measurement by optical coherence tomography; Journal of Biomedical Optics; 15(1); pp. (011104-1)-(011104-8); Jan.-Feb. 2010.
Kankaria; U.S. Appl. No. 14/400,140 entitled “Optical coherence tomography with index fiber for biological imaging,” filed Nov. 10, 2014.
Gupta et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/401,175 entitled “Atherectomy catheters with imaging,” filed Nov. 14, 2014.
Tachibana et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/400,151 entitled “Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies,” filed Nov. 10, 2014.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20130296695 A1	Nov 2013	US

Provisional Applications (3)

Number	Date	Country
61222238	Jul 2009	US
61244408	Sep 2009	US
61258100	Nov 2009	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12829267	Jul 2010	US
Child	13939161		US

Catheter-based off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging system

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract