The present disclosure generally relates to devices and methods for removing acute blockages from blood vessels during intravascular medical treatments. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a retrieval aspiration catheter.
Aspiration and clot retrieval catheters and devices are used in mechanical thrombectomy for endovascular intervention, often in cases where patients are suffering from conditions such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS), myocardial infarction (MI), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Accessing the neurovascular bed in particular is challenging with conventional technology, as the target vessels are small in diameter, remote relative to the site of insertion, and are highly tortuous.
In delivering effective devices to the small and highly branched cerebral artery system, conventional catheters must try and balance a number of factors. The catheter must be sufficiently flexible to navigate the vasculature and endure high flexure strains, while also having the axial stiffness to offer smooth and consistent advancement along the route. Newer designs have been introduced which utilize various methods to alter the stiffness between the proximal and distal portions of the catheter. But abrupt stiffness or geometric changes can hinder trackability, introduce significant stress concentrations, and potentially increase the likelihood of device kinking or buckling.
When aspirating with traditional catheters, such as a fixed-mouth catheter or a catheter which does not seal with an outer catheter, a significant portion of the aspiration flow ends up coming from vessel fluid proximal to the tip of the catheter, where there is no clot. This significantly reduces aspiration efficiency, lowering the success rate of clot removal. Furthermore firm, fibrin-rich clots can often be difficult to extract as they can become lodged in the tip of traditional fixed-mouth catheters. This lodging can cause softer portions to shear away from the firmer regions of the clot.
Other designs for aspirating catheters feature a large distal facing mouth to achieve maximum efficiency. For example, the mouth can be designed with a diameter that is considerably larger than the typical delivery catheter or sheath. As a result, the mouth is required to have both a flexible low-profile for delivery within an outer catheter but must deploy and expand to an enlarged configuration at the target site. The supporting tube of the catheter must be sufficiently flexible itself for access while having features capable of transmitting thrust loads effectively to the mouth at the distal tip.
However, many highly flexible body designs have a reduced diameter incapable of generating the required suction force, while designs with expandable members or separate suction extensions can lack the flexibility to navigate the neurovascular intact. Catheter elements must survive the severe mechanical strains imparted but also generate a sufficient radial force when expanded to prevent collapse of the catheter and the vessel under the suction of aspiration.
The present designs are aimed at providing an improved retrieval catheter with an expansile tip which incorporates these features to address the above-stated deficiencies.
The designs herein can be for a clot retrieval catheter which can have a body support tube section which can be tailored to have sufficient flexibly so as to be capable of navigating highly tortuous areas of the anatomy, such as the neurovascular, to reach occlusive clots. The support tube can also be formed with or attached to an expandable catheter tip capable of providing local flow restriction/arrest within the target vessel with a large, clot-facing mouth. The catheter can also be compatible with relatively low-profile access sheaths and catheters for further deliverability advantages.
The clot retrieval catheter can have a substantially tubular body with a support framework defining a longitudinal axis. A large catheter lumen can be configured for the passage of guidewires, microcatheters, stent retrievers, and other such devices. The lumen can also direct aspiration to the catheter tip. The tubular body can extend from a proximal end and terminate at a distal end, at which an expandable tip can be integrally formed or fixedly connected. The tip can be configured to expand from a collapsed delivery configuration to an expanded deployed configuration when deployed at the site of an occlusive thrombus.
The support framework can have one or more axial spines extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end. A series of loop ribs can be disposed along at least a length of the longitudinal spine or spines. The ribs of the support framework can define the internal lumen of the catheter extending therethrough. Each rib can intersect with the one or more spines at junction points. The junction points can have strain relief cutout features or similar geometry to relieve stress at the rib-spine junctions when the catheter is tracked through tortuous vessels in the vasculature. In some cases, rather than having independent junction points, multiple ribs may unite into a spine connector to improve the flexibility of the support tube by minimizing connections to the spine. Ribs can have wing segments with curves or taper so they merge into a spine connector which has a single junction point with each rib.
The ribs and spines can be monolithically formed though laser machining of a hypotube or extrusion of a polymeric tube. In another example the tubular body can be of metallic braid or coiled wire construction. The spine can be fixedly connected to, or formed integrally with, a part of the expansile tip.
At least a portion of the tubular section can form a seal or flow restriction with an outer catheter such that aspiration is directed to the distal tip of the clot retrieval catheter. A polymeric cover or membrane can be disposed around at least part of support framework and tip to enclose the catheter body. In another example, the cover can be a series of polymeric jackets having variable stiffness and flexure properties. The cover can be reflowed, adhered, and/or stitched to the framework of the support structure. The cover can further be coated with a low-friction layer or film to improve trackability and mitigate the risk of binding or excessive friction when delivered through an outer catheter.
The trackability and flexibility of the catheter in the vasculature can be tailored by adjusting properties of the support tube. For example, bending planes for the support tube can be defined through the location of the axial spines where the spine or spines are straight, parallel members. In another example, the spine or spines can be disposed in a spiral or helical pattern around the longitudinal axis of the support tube. The spine or spines can have a width in more proximal sections of the support tube that is different from the spine width in more distal sections. A transition from a one spine width to another can be a continuous taper or can transition between successively more flexible axial segments of the framework.
The struts forming the ribs of the framework of the support tube can have various widths, such that a first rib width of one rib is different than a second rib width of another rib. The ribs can also be a helical pattern, where the coiled structure can stagger the junction points between the ribs and the spines. The spacing, or pitch, of adjacent ribs can also be varied between the proximal end and the distal end of the support framework, such that one segment of the framework can have a dense rib pattern with greater stiffness than another segment with larger rib spacing.
In another example, the ribs can be cut or formed so they are disposed at an angle not perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the support framework, such that the diameter of the internal lumen can change as the ribs move in response to tensile or compressive forces on the support tube during a thrombectomy procedure. The ribs can also be formed so they have a non-planar cross section and the profile of the rib struts has one or more proximal and/or distal curves or undulations. The ribs can also be configured to move relative to their respective junction points with the spine or spines so the support tube can locally expand for the passage of a captured clot that is firm or incompressible.
In another example, a support tube for forming the body of a catheter assembly can have a tubular support framework having a proximal end, a distal end, an internal lumen, and a pattern of radial slots configured around a longitudinal axis. The radial slots can be, for example, cut into the circumference of an extruded polymeric tube through various clocking positions so that they are discontinuous and not completely circumferential. The cuts can form slots that are a constant length of variable length. By aligning segments of the cuts, the slots in the support tube can define interrupted, continues, or both interrupted and continuous spines running the length of the tube.
In one instance, adjacent interrupted radial slots offset from each other by 90 degrees can form two interrupted spines. When offset in this fashion, the two interrupted spines can define two bending planes normal to each other and perpendicularly aligned through the longitudinal axis of the support framework. Additional spines and bending planes can be formed interrupting the cuts in additional places around the circumference of the tube and axially aligning or offsetting adjacent cuts as desired.
In another case, the radial slots can be cut in a helix pattern where the cuts of adjacent revolution twists are aligned to form one or more continuous and/or discontinuous spines. In one example, the helix pattern of interrupted slots can include at least two cuts per rotation. In another example, the helix pattern can include more than two cuts per rotation to form both continuous and discontinuous spines circumferentially offset from one another. Multiple cuts per rotation can allow flexibility along multiple different planes.
The radial slots of the support tube can be almost or completely circumferential around the longitudinal axis. With this configuration the slots divide the axial length of the support tube into a series of rings between the proximal end and the distal end of the tube. The rings can be a constant length or can vary in length. Individual rings can be joined to adjacent rings through a series of interlocking features around the circumference of each ring. Distal interlocking features can engage a particular ring with the next distal ring, while proximal interlocking features can engage with the next proximal ring. Overall flexibility of the tube can be varied by altering the number of interlocking features or changing their shape or circumferential spacing. Interlocking features can allow the support tube to transmit axial and torsional loads and minimize expansion of the tube in tension without the use of spines. Alternatively, one or more spines can be formed in the support tube by having the slots interrupted at points around the circumference and then aligning or offsetting the interruptions to create continuous or discontinuous spines.
In another example, a support tube for the body of a catheter can have a substantially cylindrical braided pattern formed by a plurality of strands about a longitudinal axis. The cylindrical braid of strands can define the lumen of the support tube. One or more spines can extend longitudinally along the braided pattern between its proximal end and distal end; and a polymeric cover can be disposed around at least a portion the braided pattern. The polymeric cover can encapsulate at least a portion of the braided pattern so as to fill in the gaps in the braid.
At least one of the one or more spines can interweave with the strands of the braided pattern. A design with spines woven into the braid can inhibit the structure from elongating in tension or shortening in compression. The spines can have variable width between the proximal end and the distal end of the braided pattern for improved bending flexibility.
In a braided pattern, an angle is formed where two strands come together in the weave. The angle formed by the strands can be used to tailor mechanical properties, and different angles can be used for different axial segments of the support tube. In one case, the angle of the braid pattern is in the range of approximately 20-90 degrees.
Also provided is a method for constructing a clot retrieval catheter. The method can have the step of positioning a plurality of ribs along a length to define a tubular support for the catheter. The ribs can be circular or of some other shape and be oriented around a longitudinal axis of the tubular support. The ribs can also be oriented at an angle not perpendicular to the axis, allowing them to move under the forces of the thrombectomy procedure. When a clot is drawn into the distal mouth of the catheter, compressive forces can be transferred to the ribs to cause at least a portion of the ribs to move proximally relative to the longitudinal axis, effectively increasing the local diameter of the inner lumen of the catheter.
One or more axial spines can be formed along the length of the tubular support, connecting the plurality of ribs at junction points and allowing thrust to be transmitted though the tubular support. In one example, the spine or spines can be formed integrally with the ribs of the support, such as a laser cut hypotube. The spine or spines can be linear and parallel to the longitudinal axis or can be formed as a spiral or helix about the axis. A radially expandable tip can be connected to, or formed integrally with, the distal end of the tubular support. A further step can involve having a polymeric cover disposed around at least a part of the tubular support and expandable tip. The cover can be elastic so that it stretches as the tip expands, or it can be baggy or loose around the frame so that the whole radial force of the tip can be transmitted to the walls of a vessel.
Another step can involve forming and positioning the ribs and spines to tailor the bending stiffness of the catheter tubular support at different portions along the length. The ribs can, for example, be spaced more densely at the proximal end, or have a thicker strut width. Similarly, the spine or spines can have an increased width proximally and taper to a narrower profile distally, to provide good pushability and give increased distal flexibility for access.
Bending stiffness can be tailored either by or a combination of varying the cut width and rib width. Where the cut width is kept constant, for instance, the width of a laser beam, the rib width and/or spine(s) width can be varied to tailor bending stiffness. Where the cut width is varied, the rib width can be kept constant or varied and the laser can be used to remove pieces of material. It is appreciated that by using cut width equal to that of the laser beam, no pieces of material are removed, and the cost of manufacture is greatly reduced. On the other hand, by using the laser to remove pieces of material, greater variation in shaft design can be achieved. It is also appreciated that combination of both approaches may be used such that the shaft incorporates more cost-effective cutting/processing means at the proximal end and more costly approaches are kept to a specific distance at the distal end where more complicated cuts can be required to achieve the desired performance. For example, the distal end may include a length of 20 cm with cuts that remove pieces of material and also include the cutting of an expandable tip. In another example, a proximal section of the shaft may be cut from SS and be joined to a distal section cut from NiTi in order to reduce overall cost while affording the benefits of NiTi to the distal end of the device where it is required for enhance resilience to tight bending curves and also to provide expansion and recovery characteristics. For such a device, the SS and NiTi sections can be joined by welding directly, by welding to a more weldable intermediate metal such as platinum. As an alternative, laser cut interlocking features can hold both cut tubes together in a longitudinal direction. An outer membrane cover or jacket can hold the tubes together in a radial direction.
Other aspects and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, upon reviewing the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
The above and further aspects of this invention are further discussed with reference to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. The figures depict one or more implementations of the inventive devices, by way of example only, not by way of limitation.
The objective of the disclosed designs is to create a clot retrieval catheter with a radially expandable distal tip for local flow restriction/arrest and a tailored, highly flexible body section capable of navigating the tortuous areas of the vasculature to reach an occlusive clot. Such advantages can be especially beneficial in the case of stroke intervention procedures, where vessels in the neurovascular bed are small and very tortuous, where a carefully designed axial and bending stiffness profile can inhibit kinking and binding. The catheter can also be compatible with relatively low-profile access sheaths and catheters, so that a puncture wound in the patient's groin (in the case of femoral access) can be easily and reliably closed. The support structure can also feature internal and/or external low-friction liners, and an outer polymer jacket or membrane disposed around the support structure.
An advantage of using an expanding mouth clot retrieval catheter with an outer catheter is that if both have the flexibility to reach a target, the clot retrieval catheter can be retracted with a clot through the outer catheter such that the outer catheter is left in place to maintain access at the treatment location. While it is appreciated that certain clots may also require that the outer catheter be retracted with the clot and inner clot retrieval catheter, the majority of clots are likely to be removed through the inner clot retrieval catheter. Further, there will be greater confidence that the lumen of the outer catheter is clean of debris for reduced risk during contrast injection that potential thrombus remnants may be dislodged from the catheter during contrast injection as is the case with using a standard intermediate catheter. To counteract this, a user can remove the intermediate catheter to flush any thrombus remnants outside of the body prior to injecting contrast, at the cost of losing access to the target treatment location. By comparison, the present design provides a further means to minimize the number of catheter advancements required to treat a patient, thereby reducing the likelihood of vessel damage and the associated risk of vessel dissection in cases where multiple passes are required.
While the description is in many cases in the context of mechanical thrombectomy treatments, the systems and methods may be adapted for other procedures and in other body passageways as well.
Specific examples of the present invention are now described in detail with reference to the Figures, where identical reference numbers indicate elements which are functionally similar or identical. Accessing the various vessels within the vascular, whether they are coronary, pulmonary, or cerebral, involves well-known procedural steps and the use of a number of conventional, commercially available accessory products. These products, such as angiographic materials, rotating hemostasis valves, and guidewires are widely used in laboratory and medical procedures. When these or similar products are employed in conjunction with the system and methods of this invention in the description below, their function and exact constitution are not described in detail.
Turning to the figures, in
The flexibility of the catheter 35 can enable a physician to use a smaller diameter standard sheath or outer access catheter (not shown) to rapidly create a path and gain access to the vicinity of an occlusion. The aspiration catheter can be a rapid-exchange (RX) type similar to that illustrated in
The transition at the proximal joint 40 can include an ability to seal with an outer sheath or intermediate catheter, supplied with or separately from the clot retrieval catheter 35. A seal can allow an aspiration source connected to the proximal end of the intermediate catheter to have a direct connection to the mouth at the distal tip 42 of the clot retrieval catheter with little or no loss in negative pressure between the aspiration source and the mouth.
The guidewire 30 can be solid or can be a composite of multi-layer materials, such as a solid core and outer tubular portions (for example, a Nitinol core with an outer polymer jacket). The guidewire 30 can also be formed with features that interlock with features of the proximal joint 40 of the catheter body support tube 100 so that a mechanical lock is configured between the guidewire and support tube. Heat-shrink, reflowed polymer, and/or adhesives may be used to reinforce the connection between the guidewire and the support tube.
The expanded deployed form of the expansile tip framework 42 at the distal end 114 of the clot retrieval catheter 35 can take on a flared or funnel shape. By incorporating a funnel shape in to the expansile tip, a clot can be progressively compressed during retrieval to a smaller diameter so that it can be aspirated fully through the catheter an into an aspiration syringe or canister. Because of this compression, it is less likely for firm, fibrin rich clots to become lodged in the tubular section of the clot retrieval catheter. If the clot does become lodged in the mouth of the tip, the expanded mouth will protect the clot and prevent it from dislodging as the aspiration suction is maintained and the catheter 35 is retracted into the sheath or outer catheter.
The funnel design of the expansile tip of the disclosed examples can be an integral lattice laser cut directly and integrally with the support tube of the catheter shaft. Alternately, the expansile tip lattice can be injection molded as a single piece and attached to the support tube through heat welding, adhesives, or similar means. The expansile tip 42 of the clot retrieval catheter 35 can be designed to expand to a wide range of target vessel diameters, such as a carotid terminus (3.2-5.2 mm), a horizontal M1 segment of the Middle Cerebral Arteries (1.6-3.5 mm), and/or the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA, 2.7-7.5 mm). If the catheter is then retracted from an M1 segment to the ICA (or another route with a proximally increasing vessel inner diameter), the expansile tip 42 will continue to seal the vessel across a range of vessel sizes. Further, a tip capable of a range of target vessel diameters can also seal at vessel bifurcations which can have a wider cross-sectional area than the vessel proximal and vessels distal to the bifurcation. Preferably, the expansile tip 42 of the catheter 35 is expanded at the treatment location to avoid having to advance the expanded tip through the vasculature.
The distal section of the aspiration clot retrieval catheter 110 has good thrust and trackability characteristics to aid in advancing it to the target location. It can therefore have multiple designs, or be fabricated from multiple materials, to give a reducing stiffness profile along the length to minimize insertion and retraction forces. In one example, the support tube 100 can be laser cut from a hypotube and formed integrally with an expanding frame portion of the distal tip 42. In another example, the support tube can be an injection molded polymer or a metal braid or weave supporting structure. Features can also be incorporated which bias bending about certain planes or encourage twisting to reduce the imparted strains. In this way the catheter will maintain excellent lateral flexibility but will not tend to expand in or kink compression.
The catheter 35 can also have a cover or membrane disposed around or encapsulating the support tube 100 and expansile tip 42. In the disclosed examples illustrated in the figures herein the jacket or membrane is often not shown for clarity of the underlying support structure, and the construction and appearance of such a membrane can be appreciated by those of skill in the art. Suitable membrane materials can include elastic polyurethanes such as ChronoPrene®, which can have a shore hardness of 40 A or lower, or silicone elastomers. A single or variable stiffness cover can be extruded or post-formed over the support tube 100. The cover can also be laminated, or heat welded to the structure.
Alternatively, the cover can also be a formed from a series of polymer jackets. Different jackets or sets of jackets can be disposed discrete lengths along the axis of the support tube 100 in order to give distinct pushability and flexibility characteristics to different sections of the tubular portion of the catheter 35. By configuring the jackets in an axial series, it is possible to transition the overall stiffness of the catheter from being stiffer at the proximal end to extremely flexible at the distal end. Alternately, the polymer jackets of the cover can be in a radial series disposed about the support tube in order to tailor the material properties through the thickness. In a further example, transitions between jackets can be tapered or slotted to give a more seamless transition between flexibility profile of abutting jackets in longitudinal series.
In order to allow for smooth delivery of the clot retrieval catheter through an outer catheter, the outer surface of the membrane or outer jackets can be coated with a low-friction or lubricious material, such as PTFE or FEP. In another example, a low-friction inner liner can also be applied to the inner circumference of the support tube 100. Alternately, a lubricant (such as silicone oil or molybdenum disulfide) can also be used, or a coating such as a hydrophilic coating. In a further example, the inner or outer surfaces of the membrane, or the tubular section of the catheter body if formed from a polymeric extrusion, can be impregnated with a low-friction component that migrates to the surface such that the application of low-friction liners are not required.
The support tube 100 structure of framework 110 of the clot retrieval catheter 35 can be of many different configurations. In one example, the support tube 100 can have a structure similar to that illustrated in
The ribs 118 and the one or more axial spines 116 of the tubular support framework 110 can be formed from laser-cutting tube stock such as a hypotube, or of otherwise similar construction including strands with braids, weaves and/or coils with overlaid or interwoven spines. This enables the support tube 100 to have good push and torque characteristics, kink resistance, resistance to collapse under aspiration, and solid resistance to tensile elongation. Commonly used materials include Nitinol and familiar medical-grade stainless-steel alloys like 304 and 316. Hypotubes of different materials, such as stainless-steel for the proximal section of the tubular support and Nitinol for a distal portion of the tubular support tube and for the expansile mouth, said different materials being joined by welding, bonding, or by holding interlocking features in place with the inner and/or outer polymer jacket materials.
In another example, one or more of the spines 116 can be formed integrally with the distal expandable tip 42. This configuration allows the spines 116 to continue distally of the tube as a continuous member, which can yield good pushability characteristics while maintaining a gentler bending stiffness transition between the support tube 100 and the tip 42.
Although illustrated as flush with the ribs 118, it can be appreciated that the spine or spines 116 can also be located mid-wall or tangent to the inner wall of the support framework 110.
Tailoring of the stiffness and changes in stiffness for the catheter is important for situations where the distances and tortuosity can be significant, such as when it must be advanced from a patient's inner thigh, over the cardiac arch, and up into the neurovascular blood vessels inside the skull. When forming the framework 110, the dimensioning of the cuts in a hypotube to form the ribs 118 and spines 116 can be used to tailor this stiffness. For example, the ribs can be cut to various widths and spacing density. The cuts can be circumferentially continuous and terminate on either side of an axial spine 116, or the cuts can be discontinuous in a repeating or non-repeating pattern around the circumference of the tubular section. If discontinuous cuts are aligned axially, they can form one or more additional axial spines 116 to bias bending and flexing planes of the catheter support tube 100. As a further example, if circumferentially discontinuous cuts are mixed and aligned with circumferentially continuous cuts, they can form a discontinuous axial spines.
A portion or portions of the support tube 100 can flare radially outward to form a seal with the inner diameter of an outer or intermediate catheter. In another example, a seal or flow restriction is not required and lumen between the inner diameter of the outer catheter and the outer diameter of the aspirating clot retrieval catheter 35 can be small enough for aspiration losses to be negligible. Alternatively, the catheter diameters can be sized so the lumen can be set so that aspiration is applied at two locations, both the distal end of the clot retrieval catheter and the distal end of the outer catheter.
In other examples, the tubular shaft of the catheter can be supplied without a support structure of struts, such that the tubular shaft is made solely from a polymeric section. For example, the catheter 35 can have a shaft formed from a single polymeric extrusion. The extrusion can be, for instance, fabricated from polyether ether ketone (PEEK), Polyimide, Polyethylene, or another rugged thermoplastic polymer. The surface of the extrusion can be laser cut and profiled with a series of ridges or recesses to afford enhanced torque, push, and trackability characteristics. The ridges or recesses can be applied by passing the polymeric extrusion through a heated profiling die that can melt and cool the tube as it is passed through. Prior to profiling, a composite tube can be utilized that has previously been reflowed to have a variable longitudinal stiffness profile and subsequently passed through the profiling die to impart a homogenous support structure as desired.
Where an outer jacket has been reflowed over a laser cut hypotube and into the spaces between the ribs 118, there may be material radially protruding at the location of the laser cut struts. The shaft can then be pulled through a sizing die to remove any excess material above the struts such that the overall outer diameter of the support tube 100 shaft is consistent for a reduced delivery profile.
The axial spine or spines 116 themselves can be formed or cut at various thicknesses. A thicker spine can provide more column strength and axial stiffness for better kink resistance and insertion and retraction performance of the catheter. Conversely, a spine of a thinner thickness can provide more flexibility in bending for navigating tortuous areas of the vasculature. The spine or spines can also taper in thickness along the length of its axis in order to incorporate both of these advantages. A tapered spine or spines can be made stiffer proximally for good pushability characteristics and very flexible distally to allow the tubular section to contort and twist around the vessel paths.
Use of at least a single spine 116 as seen in
Another example of a support tube framework 110 having twin tapered spines 116 spaced 180 degrees apart is shown in
Compared to a single spine, the use of additional spines 116 can give the framework 110 greater resistance to localized elongation between the ribs 118 when the support tube 100 is subjected to lateral and tensile loads. The disposition of the spines 116 of the tube diametrically opposed to each other (see
In
Similar to other disclosed examples, the pitch between ribs 118 can be varied to further optimize the stiffness profile of the support tube 100. Reducing the rib pitch and increasing the thickness of rib struts can each contribute towards adding stiffness to a given region of the tube, whereas increasing rib pitch and/or decreasing rib width can reduce the stiffness properties of a given section. For example, a more proximal rib thickness 141 can be greater than the thickness 142 of a more distal rib, or a proximal rib pitch 139 can be less than a distal rib pitch 140, to add additional flexibility to the distal portion of the catheter. Similarly, a more proximal spine width 138 can be greater than a more distal spine width 136 to yield the same effect.
The combination of the aforementioned support framework 110 parameters of the ribs 118 and spines 118 with variations in the outer jacket or membrane material hardness and/or thickness can be optimized to provide a catheter body with effective pushability, trackability, and torquability in various regions of the support tube 100 such that the catheter can be delivered along the most challenging vessel paths to reach remote target treatment locations.
Referring to
Having interrupted spines which define multiple bending planes can allow for a greater freedom of movement in three-dimensional vessel paths. However, such a design can have a reduced column stiffness and be prone to elongate axially under tension, such as when an expandable mouth of the catheter is retracted into an outer intermediate catheter. Expansion of the support tube can inhibit the mouth from collapsing down and exerting a better grip on a captured clot.
Other features can be incorporated to counteract this. For example, one or more separate and continuous wire spines (not shown) can be incorporated integrally with or separate to the support tube 200. Where separate, the outer polymer jacket or membrane can be used to fuse the hypotube support framework 110 and wire spines together. The wire spines can add integrity to the structure under tensile loading and prevent the tube from axially elongating when retracting a catheter tip 42 with an expanded mouth into an outer sheath of intermediate catheter. In another example, the width of the rib 118 struts can be increased to adjust the stiffness in a way which can prevent undesired elongation of the support tube 200.
Turning to
As is the case with interrupted spines, helical spines may also tend to straighten and elongate when support tube 100 is subjected to tension. To prevent elongation, the pitch of the helix can be increased to where the twist is very gentle and, locally, the spine or spines are nearly straight. For example, a pitch between 10 mm and 200 mm can be used, more preferably between 50 mm and 100 mm.
A compound design can have a support framework 110 where a helical spine or spines 117 merge with sections of the framework where the spine or spines are straight relative to the axis 111. Regions of the support tube 100 with more flexible outer covers or jackets (not shown) can be aligned with the straight spines to reduce the likelihood of tensile elongation.
Where a helical spine 117 can have junction points 126 which form acute angles with the respective ribs 118, cutouts 128 can be made with large edge radii as shown in
Various views of another example of a support tube 300 are shown in
In one example, the cuts forming the radial slots 312 can be completely circumferential around the support tube 300. Sections around the circumference of the tube can incorporate geometric features which form a keyed interface to interlock with adjacent axial sections such that longitudinal and torsional loads can be transmitted without the use of spines. The keyed interface can be a dovetail or similar arrangement, so the support tube body fits together like a puzzle. In a similar example, the keyed joints can be maintained but the radial slots 312 can be cut with discontinuities to form continuous or discontinuous spines for circumstances where additional pushability is desired.
In some cases, the radial slots 312 can be in a helical configuration and include interruptions in an alternating pattern such that they form an interrupted spine or spines 315 which are angularly offset from the one or more continuous spines 314, as seen in
Another support tube 300 with a hypotube or polymeric extrusion having radial slots 312 cut into the tubular section is shown in
Flat patterns showing variations of support tube 300 with T-slots 317 and strain relief cutouts 128 are illustrated in
In another example, the strain relief cutouts 128 of the ribs 320 can be T-slots 317 with a gentle curve or radius at the spines 314 like those of
The ribs 118 can be cut an angle 130 so that the free ends extend distally to the junction points 126 of the ribs with the spine 116. Although angled, the ribs 118 can maintain a circular inner lumen 119 (as seen in
An illustrative example of how a support tube 100 similar to that of
A support tube 100 similar to the example of
The spine 116 of the support framework 110 can transition directly into a spine extension 44 strut or struts at the distal end 114, and the spine can be integral with the extension (e.g., cut from the same hypotube) such that the stiffness profile of the catheter is smoother and weak transitions can be eliminated. Supporting arms 45 of the expansile tip 42 can extend distally from central junctions with the spine extension 44, or one of more of the arms can be connected with the distalmost rib of the support framework 110. The arms can be connected with other struts or themselves can include radial curves to form the circumference of the enlarged distal mouth 46 of the catheter tip 42. The support arms 45 can be arranged so that they expand radially outward as a clot is being aspirated or, for example, when a thrombectomy device is being retracted through the mouth 46 for a higher success rate when targeting stiff clots.
The support ribs 118 of the support tube 100 can be formed at an angle relative to the axis of the tube so the ribs are substantially cylindrical in profile but do not have a planar cross-section. In cases where the support arms 45 of the tip 42 do not connect directly to the most distal rib, the free ends of the ribs 118 can move proximally relative to the longitudinal spine 116 when under compressive loads, such as during clot retraction. Proximal movement of the ribs 118 can have the effect of expanding the inner diameter of the catheter lumen 119 locally as the clot is retracted through the support tube. An elastomeric outer jacket or membrane covering the support framework 110 and expansile tip 42 can be configured to allow the support arms 45 and ribs 118 to expand under these compressive loads.
An example of a support tube 100 having a tubular support framework 110 where axially curved ribs 118 are spread between two continuous spines 116 spaced 180 degrees apart is shown in
The support framework 110 with ribs 118 having one or more axial curves can be arranged with the spines 116 connected in-line at the distal end 114 with the support arms 45 of an expanding catheter tip 42 framework, as illustrated in
A support tube 100 having a support framework 110 similar to that of
Further features which aid in the movement of the ribs 118 and the overall flexibility of the support framework 110 can include enlarged openings or cutouts 128 at the junction points 126 of the framework. Cutouts 128 increase the movement capability of individual ribs with respect to the spine or spines 116 while providing strain relief at the interface. A highly flexible catheter can reduce the risk of cracking or ultimate fracture by reducing the geometric stress concentration at the junctions through strain relief cutouts 128. Cutouts 128 at the junction points 126 also encourage the ribs to flex independently to better accommodate the loads of a procedure.
Various additional geometries of strain relief cutout patterns can be seen in
To improve multiaxial flexibility of the support tube, it is often advantageous to minimize the overall number of connections to the spine or spines.
A series of supporting ribs 118 can merge into opposing spine connectors 146 for connections with twin spines 116 spaced 180 degrees apart as shown in
A further example of a support tube 400 having a different configuration where radial slots create a puzzle-cut pattern is illustrated in
Flexibility of the puzzle cut support tube 400 can be varied by increasing or decreasing the size of the ligament 406 between the interlocking features of the rings 403.
Referring to
In another example, a support tube 500 can have a metal and/or polymer strand or wire construction formed into a braided or coiled structure 510, as shown in
Braided structures are known in the art to offer good flexibility in order to optimize the performance of catheter tubing. However, under tension, braids can tend to lengthen and reduce in cross-section diameter, while under compression, braids can expand in diameter and shorten. In the disclosed design of
This expansion can be achieved by changing the size, orientation, or other properties of the strands 511 of the pattern 510. Further flexibility can be gained by altering the braid angle 512 or picks per inch (PPI) of the pattern. The braid angle 512 of the strands 511 and the density of the pattern can be chosen for the preferred axial and transverse mechanical properties of a given section of the support tube 500. For example, the braid angle and/or PPI can be different in a more proximal portion of the support tube, giving the proximal portion better pushability and torque response than a more flexible distal portion.
In one example, the braid angle 512 can be less than 90 degrees and over 20 degrees so that there is freedom for the support tube 500 to longitudinally compress. Maintaining the braid angle closer to 90 degrees will give the framework more flexibility than braid angles closer to 20 degrees, as the wires or strands of the 20-degree braid will be dispositioned in a more longitudinal direction. A braid angle 512 of greater that 90 degrees can also expand but to a lesser degree due to the denser spacing between braid strands 511.
Similar to other examples, the braid pattern 510 can have an elastomeric outer cover or jacket (not shown). The jacket can be reflowed to the outer surface of the braided tube or made to encapsulate the strands 511. Reflowed jacket materials will fill the voids between the braided pattern 510 and spine 516 further dampening the expansion or contraction of the tube. Encapsulating the pattern 510 with a reflowed polymer jacket can also help hold the braid and spine(s) 516 together. The jacket can be impermeable, or alternatively the braided or coiled pattern 510 can be of sufficient density so that fluid flow is substantially impeded between the exterior and interior of the support tube, such that an impermeable cover or seal is not necessary.
Any of the herein disclosed support tubes for clot retrieval catheter designs can be used in conjunction with a mechanical thrombectomy device. The combination of mechanical thrombectomy with aspiration through a funnel-like tip section can increase the likelihood of first pass success in removing a clot. During thrombectomy, a funnel-like shape of the tip section can reduce clot shearing upon entry to the catheter, arrest flow to protect distal vessels from new territory embolization, and also direct the aspiration vacuum to the clot face while the mechanical thrombectomy device will hold a composite clot (comprised of friable regions and fibrin rich regions) together preventing embolization and aid in dislodging the clot from the vessel wall. The shape of the tip can also aid in preventing fragmentation if the clot enters the mouth of the catheter at an offset position.
The mechanical thrombectomy device will support the lumen of the vessel during aspiration such that it will be less likely to collapse under negative pressure and hold the clot together should the clot comprise an array of stiff and soft portions that may otherwise fragment. The mechanical thrombectomy device can also allow the user to pinch a clot that will not fully enter the lumen of the clot retrieval catheter, thereby ensuring that the clot will not dislodge from the clot retrieval catheter as the clot retrieval catheter, clot, and mechanical thrombectomy device are retracted as one through the vasculature, through the outer catheter, and outside of the patient. The interaction between the outer catheter and the expanded mouth will aid in gradually compressing the clot so that it can be pulled through the outer catheter with the clot retrieval catheter and mechanical thrombectomy device. If the clot is still too large to enter the outer catheter, the clot retrieval catheter and mechanical thrombectomy device can be retracted proximally through the vessel and into a second larger outer catheter such as a balloon guide. Should the clot still be too stiff to retrieve through the second outer catheter, all devices can be retracted together as one through the vasculature and outside of the body. The clot retrieval catheter may be designed to work with an outer catheter such as a 7Fr, 8Fr, 9Fr or 10Fr long guide sheath or balloon guide sheath. Alternatively, the clot retrieval catheter may be designed to work with an outer catheter such as a 4Fr, 5Fr, or 6Fr intermediate catheter.
Referring to a method 2300 outlined in
Step 2340 can involve forming one or more spines running along the length of the tubular support and can include affixing each rib of the plurality of ribs to the one or more spines. The spines can be mechanically connected to the ribs, or the spines and ribs can be formed integrally through the machining of a hypotube or the cutting of radial slots in an extruded tube. Having fixed junction or attachment points to the spine or spines allows the ribs to be configured to move proximally or distally with respect to the spine or spines when the tubular support is subjected to different forces during a procedure, as in step 2350. This movement can allow the tubular support to increase in diameter locally as a clot is being withdrawn, or reduce frictional forces generated with the clot retrieval catheter is advanced or retracted through an outer catheter. Different configurations of the ribs and spines of the tubular support can be appreciated to encourage movement of the ribs, such as narrowed ribs struts or when a single axial spine is used to give each rib an unconstrained free end.
Turing to method 2400 outlined in
A further step for preparing a tubular support for a clot retrieval catheter is shown in step 2430, which can involve fixedly attaching or integrally forming a radially-expanding tip with the distal end of the tubular support so that the catheter can have a large, distal facing mouth which can seal with the vessel and provide local flow restriction/arrest when deployed. In step 2440, at least a portion of the tubular support and expandable tip can be covered with a polymeric cover. A cover, for example, can be a series of outer jackets which are reflowed, injection molding, or laminated to the outer and/or inner radially surfaces of the ribs. One of skill in the art can also appreciate that a coating step can give the surfaces of the tubular support and/or cover lubricious, low-friction properties.
The invention is not necessarily limited to the examples described, which can be varied in construction and detail. The terms “distal” and “proximal” are used throughout the preceding description and are meant to refer to a positions and directions relative to a treating physician. As such, “distal” or distally” refer to a position distant to or a direction away from the physician. Similarly, “proximal” or “proximally” refer to a position near to or a direction towards the physician. Furthermore, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the terms “about” or “approximately” for any numerical values or ranges indicate a suitable dimensional tolerance that allows the part or collection of components to function for its intended purpose as described herein. More specifically, “about” or “approximately” may refer to the range of values ±20% of the recited value, e.g. “about 90%” may refer to the range of values from 71% to 99%.
In describing example embodiments, terminology has been resorted to for the sake of clarity. It is intended that each term contemplates its broadest meaning as understood by those skilled in the art and includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. It is also to be understood that the mention of one or more steps of a method does not preclude the presence of additional method steps or intervening method steps between those steps expressly identified. Some steps of a method can be performed in a different order than those described herein without departing from the scope of the disclosed technology. Similarly, it is also to be understood that the mention of one or more components in a device or system does not preclude the presence of additional components or intervening components between those components expressly identified. For clarity and conciseness, not all possible combinations have been listed, and such modifications are often apparent to those of skill in the art and are intended to be within the scope of the claims which follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4243040 | Beecher | Jan 1981 | A |
4324262 | Hall | Apr 1982 | A |
4351342 | Wiita et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4575371 | Nordqvist et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4592356 | Gutierrez | Jun 1986 | A |
4719924 | Crittenden et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738666 | Fuqua | Apr 1988 | A |
4767404 | Renton | Aug 1988 | A |
4793348 | Palmaz | Dec 1988 | A |
4873978 | Ginsburg | Oct 1989 | A |
5011488 | Ginsburg | Apr 1991 | A |
5092839 | Kipperman | Mar 1992 | A |
5102415 | Guenther et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5122136 | Guglielmi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123840 | Nates | Jun 1992 | A |
5171233 | Amplatz | Dec 1992 | A |
5234437 | Sepetka | Aug 1993 | A |
5256144 | Kraus et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261916 | Engelson | Nov 1993 | A |
5372124 | Takayama et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385562 | Adams | Jan 1995 | A |
5387219 | Rappe | Feb 1995 | A |
5387226 | Miraki | Feb 1995 | A |
5396902 | Brennen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5449372 | Schmaltz | Sep 1995 | A |
5520651 | Sutcu | May 1996 | A |
5538512 | Zenzon et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549626 | Miller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558652 | Henke | Sep 1996 | A |
5601600 | Ton | Feb 1997 | A |
5609627 | Goicoechea et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624461 | Mariant | Apr 1997 | A |
5639277 | Mariant | Jun 1997 | A |
5645558 | Horton | Jul 1997 | A |
5658296 | Bates | Aug 1997 | A |
5662671 | Barbut | Sep 1997 | A |
5695519 | Summer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709704 | Nott et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713853 | Clark | Feb 1998 | A |
5728078 | Powers, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5769871 | Mers Kelly | Jun 1998 | A |
5779716 | Cano | Jul 1998 | A |
5810874 | Lefebvre | Sep 1998 | A |
5814064 | Danniel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827304 | Hart | Oct 1998 | A |
5846251 | Hart | Dec 1998 | A |
5855598 | Pinchuk | Jan 1999 | A |
5893869 | Barnhart et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895398 | Wensel | Apr 1999 | A |
5897567 | Ressemann | Apr 1999 | A |
5904698 | Thomas et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911725 | Boury | Jun 1999 | A |
5935139 | Bates | Aug 1999 | A |
5938645 | Gordon | Aug 1999 | A |
5947995 | Samuels | Sep 1999 | A |
5968057 | Taheri | Oct 1999 | A |
5971938 | Hart et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997939 | Moechnig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022343 | Johnson | Feb 2000 | A |
6063113 | Kavteladze | May 2000 | A |
6066149 | Samson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066158 | Engelson | May 2000 | A |
6093196 | Okada | Jul 2000 | A |
6093199 | Brown et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096053 | Bates | Aug 2000 | A |
6099534 | Bates | Aug 2000 | A |
6102932 | Kurz | Aug 2000 | A |
6106548 | Roubin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129739 | Khosravi | Oct 2000 | A |
6142957 | Diamond et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146396 | Kónya et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146404 | Kim | Nov 2000 | A |
6165194 | Denardo | Dec 2000 | A |
6165199 | Barbut | Dec 2000 | A |
6168604 | Cano | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168622 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174318 | Bates et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179861 | Khosravi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203561 | Ramee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214026 | Lepak | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221006 | Dubrul | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238412 | Dubrul | May 2001 | B1 |
6245087 | Addis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251122 | Tsukernik | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254571 | Hart | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264663 | Cano | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6306163 | Fitz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309379 | Willard | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312444 | Barbut | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315778 | Gambale et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325819 | Pavcnik et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334864 | Amplatz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336934 | Gilson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348056 | Bates | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350271 | Kurz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371963 | Nishtala et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375668 | Gifford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383205 | Samson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383206 | Gillick | May 2002 | B1 |
6391037 | Greenhalgh | May 2002 | B1 |
6402771 | Palmer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409683 | Fonseca et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416541 | Denardo | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6425909 | Dieck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432122 | Gilson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436112 | Wensel | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6458139 | Palmer | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6346116 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485497 | Wensel | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485501 | Green | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485502 | Don Michael | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6511492 | Rosenbluth | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517551 | Driskill | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520934 | Lee et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520951 | Carrillo, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530935 | Wensel | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530939 | Hopkins | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540768 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544279 | Hopkins | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551341 | Boylan et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551342 | Shen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575997 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582448 | Boyle | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585756 | Strecker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589265 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592607 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592616 | Stack | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602271 | Adams | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602272 | Boylan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605102 | Mazzocchi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610077 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616679 | Khosravi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632241 | Hanoock et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638245 | Miller | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638293 | Makower et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641590 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652555 | VanTassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656218 | Denardo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660021 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663650 | Sepetka | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673089 | Yassour et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685722 | Rosenbluth | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692504 | Kurz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692508 | Wensel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692509 | Wensel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702782 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712834 | Yassour et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726701 | Gilson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730104 | Sepetka | May 2004 | B1 |
6726703 | Broome et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6824545 | Sepetka | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855155 | Denardo et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6878163 | Denardo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890340 | Duane | May 2005 | B2 |
6913612 | Palmer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6913618 | Denardo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6953472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6989019 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989021 | Bosma et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994718 | Groothuis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997939 | Linder | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004954 | Voss et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004955 | Shen | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004956 | Palmer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008434 | Kurz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033376 | Tsukernik | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041116 | Goto | May 2006 | B2 |
7048758 | Boyle | May 2006 | B2 |
7058456 | Pierce | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7063707 | Bose | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7153320 | Euteneuer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175655 | Malaei | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179273 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7220269 | Ansel | May 2007 | B1 |
7220271 | Clubb | May 2007 | B2 |
7226464 | Garner et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229472 | DePalma et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232462 | Schaeffer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7288112 | Denardo et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306618 | Demond | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316692 | Huffmaster | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323001 | Cubb | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331976 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7344550 | Garrison et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7399308 | Borillo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410491 | Hopkins | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452496 | Brady et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491215 | Vale et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491216 | Brady | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7510565 | Gilson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534252 | Sepetka | May 2009 | B2 |
7556636 | Mazzocchi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582111 | Krolik et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594926 | Linder | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7604649 | McGuckin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618434 | Santra et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7662165 | Gilson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670356 | Mazzocchi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691121 | Rosenbluth | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7691124 | Balgobin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708770 | Linder | May 2010 | B2 |
7736385 | Agnew | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766934 | Pal | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771452 | Pal | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780694 | Palmer | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780696 | Daniel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7819893 | Brady et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828815 | Mazzocchi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846176 | Mazzocchi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846175 | Bonnette et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850708 | Pal | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887560 | Kusleika | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901426 | Gilson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914549 | Morsi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922732 | Mazzocchi | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927349 | Brady et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927784 | Simpson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931659 | Bose et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
3002822 | Glocker et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
7998165 | Huffmaster | Aug 2011 | B2 |
3021379 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
3021380 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
8043326 | Hancock et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048151 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052640 | Fiorella et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057497 | Raju et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8066757 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070791 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088140 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100935 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109941 | Richardson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118829 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123769 | Osborne | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137377 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142422 | Makower et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142442 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8182508 | Magnuson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187298 | Pal | May 2012 | B2 |
8246641 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246672 | Osborne | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252017 | Paul, Jr. et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252018 | Valaie | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8357178 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357179 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357893 | Xu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361095 | Osborne | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366663 | Fiorella et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372133 | Douk et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382742 | Hermann | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8409215 | Sepetka et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419748 | Valaie | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460312 | Bose et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460313 | Huffmaster | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8486104 | Samson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8529596 | Grandfield et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8574262 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579915 | French et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585643 | Vo | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585713 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8608761 | Osbourne et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8679142 | Slee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8696622 | Fiorella et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702652 | Fiorella et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702724 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8784434 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784441 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795305 | Grandfield et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8795317 | Grandfield et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8795345 | Grandfield et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814892 | Galdonik et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814925 | Hilaire et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8900265 | Ulm, III | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8939991 | Krolick et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945143 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8945172 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968330 | Rosenbluth et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9039749 | Shrivastava et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9072537 | Grandfield et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9113936 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119656 | Bose et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138307 | Valaie | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149609 | Ansel et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155552 | Ulm, III | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9161766 | Slee et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173668 | Ulm, III | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186487 | Dubrul et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9198687 | Fulkerson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9204887 | Cully et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9221132 | Bowman | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9232992 | Heidner | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9532792 | Galdonik et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9532873 | Kelley | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9533344 | Monetti et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9539011 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9539022 | Bowman | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9539122 | Burke et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9539382 | Nelson | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549830 | Bruszewski et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554805 | Tompkins et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561125 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9572982 | Burnes et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9579484 | Barnell | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585642 | Dinsmoor et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9615832 | Bose et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9615951 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9622753 | Cox | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636115 | Henry et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9636439 | Chu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9642635 | Vale et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9642675 | Werneth et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9655633 | Leynov et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9655645 | Staunton | May 2017 | B2 |
9655989 | Cruise et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9662129 | Galdonik et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9662238 | Dwork et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9662425 | Lilja et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9668898 | Wong | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675477 | Thompson | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675782 | Connolly | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9676022 | Ensign et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9692557 | Murphy | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9693852 | Lam et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9700262 | Janik et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9700399 | Acosta-Acevedo | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717421 | Griswold et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9717500 | Tieu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9717502 | Teoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9724103 | Cruise et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9724526 | Strother et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9750565 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9757260 | Greenan | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9764111 | Gulachenski | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9770251 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9770577 | Li et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9775621 | Tompkins et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9775706 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9775732 | Khenansho | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9788800 | Mayoras, Jr. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9795391 | Saatchi et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801980 | Karino et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9808599 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9833252 | Sepetka et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9833604 | Lam et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9833625 | Waldhauser et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10028759 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10149692 | Turjman et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10265086 | Vale | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10716915 | Ogle et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10610668 | Burkholz et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10835271 | Ma | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20010001315 | Bates | May 2001 | A1 |
20010011182 | Dubrul et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016755 | Addis | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010041899 | Foster | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044598 | Parodi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044634 | Don Michael et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051810 | Dubrul | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002383 | Sepetka et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016609 | Wensel | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022859 | Hogendijk | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026211 | Khosravi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049468 | Streeter | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052620 | Barvut | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068954 | Foster | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072764 | Sepetka | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082558 | Samson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091407 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095171 | Belef | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123765 | Sepetka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143362 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156455 | Barbut | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161393 | Demond | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165576 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173819 | Leeflang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177800 | Bagaoisan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188276 | Evans | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004536 | Boylan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004538 | Secrest | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004542 | Wensel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009146 | Muni | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009191 | Wensel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023204 | Vo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040769 | Kelley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040772 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050663 | Khachin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105484 | Boyle et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125798 | Matrin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130682 | Broome et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144687 | Brady et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153940 | Nohilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153943 | Michael et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153944 | Phung | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163064 | Vrba | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163158 | Wlite | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171769 | Barbut | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176884 | Berrada et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187495 | Cully et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195537 | Dubrul | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195554 | Shen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199917 | Knudson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204202 | Palmer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212430 | Bose | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216611 | Vu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236533 | Wilson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010280 | Adams et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010282 | Kusleika | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014002 | Lundgren | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040068288 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073243 | Sepetka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079429 | Miller | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082962 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093065 | Yachia et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133231 | Maitland | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138692 | Phung | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153049 | Hewitt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153118 | Clubb | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193107 | Pierpont et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199202 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260333 | Dubrul et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015047 | Shah | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020974 | Noriega | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033348 | Sepetka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038447 | Huffmaster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038468 | Panetta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049619 | Sepetka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049669 | Jones | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049670 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055033 | Leslie et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055047 | Greenhalgh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059993 | Ramzipoor et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059995 | Sepetka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085849 | Sepetka | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090857 | Kusleika et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119668 | Teague et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125024 | Sepetka | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149111 | Kanazawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171566 | Kanamaru | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187570 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050267491 | Kellett et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216030 | Sepetka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216050 | Sepetka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050288686 | Sepetka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228417 | Teitelbaum et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060009785 | Maitland et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009799 | Kleshinski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010636 | Vacher | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030933 | DeLeggge et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036271 | Schomer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058836 | Bose | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058837 | Bose | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058838 | Bose | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064151 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149313 | Arguello et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155305 | Freudenthal | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155322 | Sater et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161187 | Levine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195137 | Sepetka | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224177 | Finitsis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224179 | Kucharczyk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229638 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282111 | Morsi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287701 | Pal | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070088383 | Pal et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142858 | Bates | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149996 | Coughlin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156170 | Hancock | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165170 | Fukuda | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191866 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198028 | Miloslavski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198051 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198075 | Levy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208367 | Fiorella | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208371 | French | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213765 | Adams et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225749 | Martin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239254 | Chia et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244505 | Gilson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270902 | Slazas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288038 | Bimbo | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293887 | Okushi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080045881 | Teitelbaum et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082107 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086190 | Ta | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091223 | Pokorney | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097398 | Mitelberg | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109031 | Sepetka | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109032 | Sepetka | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119886 | Greenhalgh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177296 | Sepetka | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183197 | Sepetka | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183198 | Sepetka | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183205 | Sepetka | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188876 | Sepetka | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188885 | Sepetka | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188928 | Salahieh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200946 | Braun | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215077 | Sepetka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221600 | Dieck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228209 | DeMello et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234706 | Sepetka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243170 | Jenson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255596 | Jenson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262528 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262532 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275488 | Fleming | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275493 | Farmiga | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281350 | Sepetka | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312681 | Ansel | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024157 | Anukhin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054918 | Henson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069828 | Martin | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076539 | Valaie | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105722 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105737 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131908 | McKay | May 2009 | A1 |
20090163846 | Aklog et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090177206 | Lozier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182336 | Brenzel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221967 | Thommen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270815 | Stamp et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281610 | Parker | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292297 | Ferrere | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292307 | Razack | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299374 | Tilson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299393 | Martin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306702 | Miloslavski | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004607 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030186 | Stivland | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030256 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036312 | Krolik et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087908 | Hilaire | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114017 | Lenker | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125326 | Kalstad | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125327 | Agnew | May 2010 | A1 |
20100191272 | Keating | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211094 | Sargent, Jr. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249815 | Jantzen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268264 | Bonnett et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268265 | Krolik et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292726 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305566 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305604 | Pah | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318178 | Rapaport et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324649 | Mattsson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331949 | Habib | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009875 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009940 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009942 | Gregorich | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022149 | Cox et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054514 | Arcand | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054516 | Keegan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060359 | Hannes | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071432 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077620 | deBeer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098683 | Wiita et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110054504 | Wolf et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125181 | Brady et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130756 | Everson, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152920 | Eckhouse et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160763 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166586 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196414 | Porter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202088 | Eckhouse et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213290 | Chin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213297 | Aklog et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213393 | Aklog et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213403 | Aboytes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218564 | Drasler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224707 | Miloslavaski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264132 | Strauss et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276120 | Gilson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319917 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120041449 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041474 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059356 | diPama et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089216 | Rapaport et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101510 | Lenker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116351 | Chomas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116440 | Leynov et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143237 | Cam et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143239 | Aklog et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150147 | Leynov et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165858 | Eckhouse et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165859 | Eckhouse et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215250 | Grandfield et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120277788 | Cattaneo | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283768 | Cox et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296362 | Cam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316600 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006284 | Aggerholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030461 | Marks et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046330 | McIntosh et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046333 | Jones et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046334 | Jones et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130116774 | Strauss et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131614 | Hassan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144326 | Brady et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144328 | Weber et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158592 | Porter | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184703 | Shireman et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184739 | Brady et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197567 | Brady et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226146 | Tekulve | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268050 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281788 | Garrison | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289697 | Baker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325055 | Eckhouse et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325056 | Eckhouse et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345739 | Brady et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012281 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046359 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052097 | Petersen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140081243 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121672 | Folk | May 2014 | A1 |
20140128905 | Molaei | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135812 | Divino et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180377 | Bose et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188127 | Dubrul et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140194919 | Losardo et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200607 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200608 | Brady et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236220 | Inoue | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257018 | Farnan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257362 | Eldenschink | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276922 | McLain et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277003 | Hendrick | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277053 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277079 | Vale et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309657 | Ben-Ami | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309673 | Dacuycuy et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330302 | Tekulve et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343585 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140364896 | Consigny | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140371769 | Vale et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140371779 | Vale et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140371780 | Vale et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379023 | Brady et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018859 | Quick et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150018860 | Quick et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150080937 | Davidson | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081003 | Wainwright et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150112376 | Molaei et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133990 | Davidson | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142043 | Furey | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164523 | Brady et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150173783 | Tah et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238314 | Börtlein et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150250497 | Marks et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150257775 | Gilvarry et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150258270 | Kunis | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297252 | Miloslavski et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150306311 | Pinchuk et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313617 | Grandfield et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150320431 | Ulm, III | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150351770 | Fulton, III | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150352325 | Quick | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359547 | Vale et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374391 | Quick et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374393 | Brady et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374479 | Vale | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160015402 | Brady et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022296 | Brady et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160066921 | Brady et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160074067 | Furnish et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160106448 | Brady et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106449 | Brady et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160113663 | Brady et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160113664 | Brady et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160113665 | Brady et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160120558 | Brady et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160121080 | Cottone | May 2016 | A1 |
20160135829 | Holochwost et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143653 | Yale et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160151079 | Aklog et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160192953 | Brady et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160192954 | Brady et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160192955 | Brady et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160192956 | Brady et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160228134 | Martin et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160256180 | Vale et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160262880 | Li et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160317168 | Brady et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346002 | Avneri et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007264 | Cruise et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007265 | Guo et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020670 | Murray et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020700 | Bienvenu et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170027640 | Kunis et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170027692 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170027725 | Argentine | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170035436 | Morita | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170035567 | Duffy | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042548 | Lam | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170049596 | Schabert | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170065401 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071614 | Vale et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071737 | Kelley | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170072452 | Monetti et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079671 | Morero et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079680 | Bowman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079766 | Wang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079767 | Leon-Yip | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079812 | Lam et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079817 | Sepetka et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079819 | Pung et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079820 | Lam et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086851 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086862 | Vale et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086863 | Brady et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086996 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170095138 | Nakade et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170095259 | Tompkins et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100126 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100141 | Morero et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100143 | Granfield | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100183 | Iaizzo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170105743 | Vale et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170112515 | Brady et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113023 | Steingisser et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170147765 | Mehta | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151032 | Loisel | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165062 | Rothstein | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165065 | Rothstein et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165454 | Tuohy et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172554 | Bortlein et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172581 | Bose et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172766 | Vong et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172772 | Khenansho | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189033 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170189035 | Porter | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170215902 | Leynov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170216484 | Cruise et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224350 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224355 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224467 | Piccagli et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224511 | Dwork et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224953 | Tran et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170231749 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238953 | Yang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252043 | Fuller et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170252064 | Staunton | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170259042 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170265983 | Lam et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170281192 | Tieu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281331 | Perkins et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281344 | Costello | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281909 | Northrop et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281912 | Melder et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170290593 | Sethna | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170290654 | Sethna | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296324 | Argentine | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296325 | Marrocco et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303939 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303942 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303947 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303948 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304041 | Argentine | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304097 | Corwin et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304595 | Nagasrinivasa et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170312109 | Le | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170312484 | Shipley et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170316561 | Helm et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170319826 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333228 | Orth et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333236 | Greenan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333678 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340383 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170348014 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170348514 | Guyon et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180008407 | Maimon et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180042623 | Batiste | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180193050 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180193591 | Jaroch et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180235743 | Farago et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190021755 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190021759 | Krolik et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190029820 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190029825 | Fitterer et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190046219 | Marchand et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190192175 | Chida et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190209206 | Patel et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216476 | Barry et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190239907 | Brady et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190255290 | Snyder | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269491 | Jalgaonkar et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190274810 | Phouasalit et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190298396 | Gamba et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190365411 | Avneri et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190366049 | Hannon et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200038628 | Chou et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200281611 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200353208 | Merhi et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210153883 | Casey et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210153884 | Casey et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210154433 | Casey et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210219821 | Appling | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20220117614 | Salmon et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220125450 | Sirhan et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20230054898 | Gurovich et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1658920 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1972728 | May 2007 | CN |
103071195 | May 2013 | CN |
104507380 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104905873 | Sep 2015 | CN |
105007973 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105307582 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105726163 | Jul 2016 | CN |
106232059 | Dec 2016 | CN |
113040865 | Jun 2021 | CN |
20 2009 001 951 | Apr 2010 | DE |
10 2009 056 450 | Jun 2011 | DE |
10 2010 010 849 | Sep 2011 | DE |
10 2010 014 778 | Oct 2011 | DE |
10 2010 024 085 | Dec 2011 | DE |
10 2011 014 586 | Sep 2012 | DE |
20 2020 107013 | Jan 2021 | DE |
2301450 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2628455 | Aug 2013 | EP |
3302312 | Apr 2018 | EP |
3335647 | Jun 2018 | EP |
3 420 978 | Jan 2019 | EP |
4049704 | Aug 2022 | EP |
2498349 | Jul 2013 | GB |
9-19438 | Jan 1997 | JP |
WO 9304722 | Mar 1993 | WO |
9424926 | Nov 1994 | WO |
9727808 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9738631 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9920335 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9956801 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9960933 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0121077 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0202162 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0211627 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0243616 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02070061 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02094111 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03002006 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03018085 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03030751 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03051448 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004028571 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004056275 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005000130 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005027779 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005027751 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006021407 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006031410 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006107641 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006135823 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007054307 | May 2007 | WO |
2007068424 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008034615 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008051431 | May 2008 | WO |
2008131116 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009019664 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009031338 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009076482 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009086482 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009105710 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009103125 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010010545 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010046897 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010075565 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010102307 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010146581 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011013556 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011066961 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011082319 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011095352 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011106426 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011110316 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012052982 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012064726 | May 2012 | WO |
2012081020 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012110619 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012120490 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012156924 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013016435 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013072777 | May 2013 | WO |
2013105099 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013109756 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014081892 | May 2014 | WO |
2014139845 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014169266 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014178198 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO 2014188300 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015061365 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015134625 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015179324 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO 2015179377 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015189354 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016010995 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2017004234 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO 2017097616 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2018193603 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2018178979 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2019064306 | Apr 2019 | WO |
WO 2019079296 | Apr 2019 | WO |
WO 2020139979 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO 2021016213 | Jan 2021 | WO |
WO 2021167653 | Aug 2021 | WO |
WO 2022020366 | Jan 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,348,062 B1, 02/2002, Hopkins (withdrawn) |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 5, 2021 issued in European Patent Application No. 21 16 7037. |
Struffert, T., et al. “Intravenous flat detector CT angiography for non-invasive visualisation of intracranial flow diverter: technical feasibility” Eur Radiol 21:1797-1801 (2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210307766 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |