The present technology is related to catheters. In particular, at least some embodiments are related to neuromodulation catheters having one or more cuts and/or other features that enhance flexibility, such as to facilitate intravascular delivery via transradial or other suitable percutaneous transluminal approaches.
The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is a primarily involuntary bodily control system typically associated with stress responses. Fibers of the SNS extend through tissue in almost every organ system of the human body and can affect characteristics such as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. Such regulation can have adaptive utility in maintaining homeostasis or in preparing the body for rapid response to environmental factors. Chronic activation of the SNS, however, is a common maladaptive response that can drive the progression of many disease states. Excessive activation of the renal SNS in particular has been identified experimentally and in humans as a likely contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (e.g., heart failure), and progressive renal disease.
Sympathetic nerves of the kidneys terminate in the renal blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and the renal tubules, among other structures. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves can cause, for example, increased renin release, increased sodium reabsorption, and reduced renal blood flow. These and other neural-regulated components of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone. For example, reduced renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate as a result of renal sympathetic efferent stimulation is likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome, (i.e., renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure). Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal sympathetic stimulation include centrally-acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (e.g., to reduce renin release), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (e.g., to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release), and diuretics (e.g., to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). These pharmacologic strategies, however, have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects, and others.
Many aspects of the present technology can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed on illustrating clearly the principles of the present technology. For ease of reference, throughout this disclosure identical reference numbers may be used to identify identical or at least generally similar or analogous components or features.
Neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology include elongate shafts having one or more cuts and/or other features that enhance flexibility without unduly compromising desirable axial stiffness (e.g., pushability or other responsiveness to axial force) and/or desirable torsional stiffness (e.g., torqueability or other responsiveness to torsional force). For example, a neuromodulation catheter configured in accordance with a particular embodiment of the present technology is sufficiently flexible in some respects to facilitate deployment via a relatively long and/or tortuous intravascular path without excessive resistance, while still being sufficiently stiff in other respects so as to allow intravascular navigation or other suitable manipulation via an extracorporeal handle. Desirable axial stiffness can include, for example, the capability of the shaft to be advanced or withdrawn along the length of an intravascular path without significantly buckling or elongating. Desirable torsional stiffness can include, for example, the capability of the shaft to distally transfer rotational motion (e.g., from a handle at a proximal end portion of the shaft to a neuromodulation element operably connected to the shaft via a distal end portion of the shaft) with close correspondence (e.g., at least about one-to-one correspondence). In addition or alternatively, desirable torsional stiffness can include the capability of the shaft to distally transfer rotational motion without causing whipping and/or diametrical deformation of the shaft. Desirable axial and torsional stiffness together can facilitate predictable and controlled transmission of axial and torsional force from the proximal end portion of the shaft toward the distal end portion of the shaft while a neuromodulation catheter is in use.
Metal hypodermic (needle) tubing, aka hypotubing, is commonly incorporated into small-diameter shafts of medical catheters to utilize the wire-like physical properties of such material along with the useable lumen extending therethrough. However, solid-walled metal tubing also has known limitations regarding flexibility and kink resistance, and various designs have utilized slits, slots or other openings in the tubing wall to achieve improvements in flexibility. Such modifications to the wall structure have always brought about compromises in physical properties in tension, compression, and torsion. Thus, in at least some conventional neuromodulation catheters, imparting flexibility can require unduly sacrificing axial stiffness and/or torsional stiffness. For example, creating a continuous helical cut in a relatively rigid hypotube of a shaft tends to increase the flexibility of the shaft, but, in some instances, the resulting coils between turns of the cut may also tend to separate to an undesirable degree in response to tension on the shaft and/or torsion on the shaft in at least one circumferential direction. In some cases, this separation can cause a permanent or temporary change in the length of the shaft (e.g., undesirable elongation of the shaft), a permanent or temporary diametrical deformation of the shaft (e.g., undesirable flattening of a cross-section of the shaft), and/or torsional whipping. Such shaft behavior can interfere with intravascular navigation and/or have other undesirable effects on neuromodulation procedures.
Due, at least in part, to enhanced flexibility in combination with desirable axial and torsional stiffness, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well-suited for intravascular delivery to treatment locations (e.g., treatment locations within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient) via transradial approaches (e.g., approaches that include the radial artery, the subclavian artery, and the descending aorta). Transradial approaches are typically more tortuous and longer than femoral approaches and at least some other commonly used approaches. Transradial approaches can be desirable for accessing certain anatomy, but other types of approaches (e.g., femoral approaches) may be desirable in particularly tortuous anatomy or vessels having relatively small diameters. In some instances, however, use of transradial approaches can provide certain advantages over use of femoral approaches. In some cases, for example, use of transradial approaches can be associated with increased patient comfort, decreased bleeding, and/or faster sealing of the percutaneous puncture site relative to use of femoral approaches.
In addition to or instead of facilitating intravascular delivery via transradial approaches, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well suited for intravascular delivery via one or more other suitable approaches, such as other suitable approaches that are shorter or longer than transradial approaches and other suitable approaches that are less tortuous or more tortuous than transradial approaches. For example, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well suited for intravascular delivery via brachial approaches and/or femoral approaches. Even when used with approaches that are generally shorter and/or less tortuous than transradial approaches, the combination of flexibility and desirable axial and torsional stiffness associated with neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be beneficial, such as to accommodate anatomical differences between patients and/or to reduce vessel trauma during delivery, among other potential benefits.
Specific details of several embodiments of the present technology are described herein with reference to
As used herein, the terms “distal” and “proximal” define a position or direction with respect to a clinician or a clinician's control device (e.g., a handle of a neuromodulation catheter). The terms, “distal” and “distally” refer to a position distant from or in a direction away from a clinician or a clinician's control device. The terms “proximal” and “proximally” refer to a position near or in a direction toward a clinician or a clinician's control device. The headings provided herein are for convenience only and should not be construed as limiting the subject matter disclosed.
Selected Examples of Neuromodulation Catheters and Related Devices
In some embodiments, intravascular delivery of the neuromodulation catheter 102 includes percutaneously inserting a guide wire (not shown) into a body lumen of a patient and moving the shaft 108 and the neuromodulation element 112 along the guide wire until the neuromodulation element 112 reaches a suitable treatment location. In other embodiments, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be a steerable or non-steerable device configured for use without a guide wire. In still other embodiments, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be configured for delivery via a guide catheter or sheath (not shown).
The console 104 can be configured to control, monitor, supply, and/or otherwise support operation of the neuromodulation catheter 102. Alternatively, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be self-contained or otherwise configured for operation without connection to the console 104. When present, the console 104 can be configured to generate a selected form and/or magnitude of energy for delivery to tissue at the treatment location via the neuromodulation element 112 (e.g., via one or more energy delivery elements (not shown) of the neuromodulation element 112). The console 104 can have different configurations depending on the treatment modality of the neuromodulation catheter 102. When the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for electrode-based, heat-element-based, or transducer-based treatment, for example, the console 104 can include an energy generator (not shown) configured to generate radio frequency (RF) energy (e.g., monopolar and/or bipolar RF energy), pulsed energy, microwave energy, optical energy, ultrasound energy (e.g., intravascularly delivered ultrasound, extracorporeal ultrasound, and/or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)), cryotherapeutic energy, direct heat energy, chemicals (e.g., drugs and/or other agents), radiation (e.g., infrared, visible, and/or gamma radiation), and/or another suitable type of energy. When the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for cryotherapeutic treatment, for example, the console 104 can include a refrigerant reservoir (not shown) and can be configured to supply the neuromodulation catheter 102 with refrigerant. Similarly, when the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for chemical-based treatment (e.g., drug infusion), the console 104 can include a chemical reservoir (not shown) and can be configured to supply the neuromodulation catheter 102 with one or more chemicals.
In some embodiments, the system 100 includes a control device 114 along the cable 106. The control device 114 can be configured to initiate, terminate, and/or adjust operation of one or more components of the neuromodulation catheter 102 directly and/or via the console 104. In other embodiments, the control device 114 can be absent or have another suitable location (e.g., within the handle 110). The console 104 can be configured to execute an automated control algorithm 116 and/or to receive control instructions from an operator. Furthermore, the console 104 can be configured to provide feedback to an operator before, during, and/or after a treatment procedure via an evaluation/feedback algorithm 118.
As shown in
By varying the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122, different segments of the shaft 108 can have different levels of flexibility. For example, with reference to
In some embodiments, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 are sinusoidal and have amplitudes with different (e.g., perpendicular) orientations relative to the longitudinal axis 124. In other embodiments, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can have other suitable forms. For example, as shown in
Referring next to
As shown in
In other embodiments, the shaft can include the fourth cut shapes 148 without the third cut shapes 146. Although the third and fourth cut shapes 146, 148 are potentially useful alone or in combination with other cut shapes, it is expected that combinations of the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 may be more stable than the third and fourth cut shapes 146, 148 alone or in combination during use of a neuromodulation catheter. For example, is it expected that combinations of cut shapes that impart resistance to complementary sets of fewer than all types of axial and torsional force that may act on a shaft during use of a neuromodulation catheter may facilitate dissipation of localized stresses along a cut. It will further be appreciated that catheters configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include various combinations of cut shapes tailored to provide a desired level of flexibility and/or control for different applications.
Instead of or in addition to a cut tube, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can include one or more elongate members (e.g., filaments, wires, ribbons, or other suitable structures) helically wound into one or more tubular shapes. Similar to the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of a cut along a longitudinal axis of a shaft (e.g., as discussed above with reference to
In some embodiments, at least one of the first and second helically wound elongate members 170, 176 is multifilar. For example, in the embodiment shown in
With reference to
Instead of or in addition to a cut tube and/or a helically wound elongate member, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can include shafts having one or more segments with different shape memory properties. With reference to
The second shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of the second shape-memory transformation temperature range can be lower than the first shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of the first shape-memory transformation temperature range. For example, the first shape-memory transformation temperature range can include an Af temperature greater than body temperature and the second shape-memory transformation temperature range includes an Af temperature less than body temperature. A shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of a shape-memory transformation temperature range of the shaft 108 can increase (e.g., abruptly, gradually, or incrementally) along the third segment 127c from the second segment 127b toward the first segment 127a. In some embodiments, to vary the shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures along the length of the shaft 108, the first, second, and third segments 127a-c are formed separately and then joined. In other embodiments, the shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or the Af temperatures along the length of the shaft 108 can be achieved by processing the first, second, and third segments 127a-c differently while they are joined. For example, one of the first, second, and third segments 127a-c can be subjected to a heat treatment to change its shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or Af temperature while the others of the first, second, and third segments 127a-c are thermally insulated.
It is expected that greater shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges may increase flexibility and decrease axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft (e.g., by causing nitinol to tend to assume a austenite phase at body temperature), and that lower shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges may decrease flexibility and increase axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft (e.g., by causing nitinol to tend to assume a martensite phase at body temperature). Accordingly, the positions of segments of a shaft having different shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges can be selected to change the flexibility of the shaft relative to the axial and torsional stiffness of the shaft along the length of a shaft (e.g., to facilitate intravascular delivery of a neuromodulation element to a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient via a transradial or other suitable approach).
Renal Neuromodulation
Renal neuromodulation is the partial or complete incapacitation or other effective disruption of nerves of the kidneys (e.g., nerves terminating in the kidneys or in structures closely associated with the kidneys). In particular, renal neuromodulation can include inhibiting, reducing, and/or blocking neural communication along neural fibers (e.g., efferent and/or afferent neural fibers) of the kidneys. Such incapacitation can be long-term (e.g., permanent or for periods of months, years, or decades) or short-term (e.g., for periods of minutes, hours, days, or weeks). Renal neuromodulation is expected to contribute to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone or drive and/or to benefit at least some specific organs and/or other bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves. Accordingly, renal neuromodulation is expected to be useful in treating clinical conditions associated with systemic sympathetic overactivity or hyperactivity, particularly conditions associated with central sympathetic overstimulation. For example, renal neuromodulation is expected to efficaciously treat hypertension, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic and end stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, polycystic kidney disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, osteoporosis, erectile dysfunction, and sudden death, among other conditions.
Renal neuromodulation can be electrically-induced, thermally-induced, chemically-induced, or induced in another suitable manner or combination of manners at one or more suitable treatment locations during a treatment procedure. The treatment location can be within or otherwise proximate to a renal lumen (e.g., a renal artery, a ureter, a renal pelvis, a major renal calyx, a minor renal calyx, or another suitable structure), and the treated tissue can include tissue at least proximate to a wall of the renal lumen. For example, with regard to a renal artery, a treatment procedure can include modulating nerves in the renal plexus, which lay intimately within or adjacent to the adventitia of the renal artery.
Renal neuromodulation can include a cryotherapeutic treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Cryotherapeutic treatment can include cooling tissue at a treatment location in a manner that modulates neural function. For example, sufficiently cooling at least a portion of a sympathetic renal nerve can slow or potentially block conduction of neural signals to produce a prolonged or permanent reduction in renal sympathetic activity. This effect can occur as a result of cryotherapeutic tissue damage, which can include, for example, direct cell injury (e.g., necrosis), vascular or luminal injury (e.g., starving cells from nutrients by damaging supplying blood vessels), and/or sublethal hypothermia with subsequent apoptosis. Exposure to cryotherapeutic cooling can cause acute cell death (e.g., immediately after exposure) and/or delayed cell death (e.g., during tissue thawing and subsequent hyperperfusion). Neuromodulation using a cryotherapeutic treatment in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include cooling a structure proximate an inner surface of a body lumen wall such that tissue is effectively cooled to a depth where sympathetic renal nerves reside. For example, in some embodiments, a cooling assembly of a cryotherapeutic device can be cooled to the extent that it causes therapeutically-effective, cryogenic renal neuromodulation. In other embodiments, a cryotherapeutic treatment modality can include cooling that is not configured to cause neuromodulation. For example, the cooling can be at or above cryogenic temperatures and can be used to control neuromodulation via another treatment modality (e.g., to protect tissue from neuromodulating energy).
Renal neuromodulation can include an electrode-based or transducer-based treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Electrode-based or transducer-based treatment can include delivering electricity and/or another form of energy to tissue at a treatment location to stimulate and/or heat the tissue in a manner that modulates neural function. For example, sufficiently stimulating and/or heating at least a portion of a sympathetic renal nerve can slow or potentially block conduction of neural signals to produce a prolonged or permanent reduction in renal sympathetic activity. A variety of suitable types of energy can be used to stimulate and/or heat tissue at a treatment location. For example, neuromodulation in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include delivering RF energy, pulsed energy, microwave energy, optical energy, focused ultrasound energy (e.g., high-intensity focused ultrasound energy), or another suitable type of energy alone or in combination. An electrode or transducer used to deliver this energy can be used alone or with other electrodes or transducers in a multi-electrode or multi-transducer array. Furthermore, the energy can be applied from within the body (e.g., within the vasculature or other body lumens in a catheter-based approach) and/or from outside the body (e.g., via an applicator positioned outside the body). Furthermore, energy can be used to reduce damage to non-targeted tissue when targeted tissue adjacent to the non-targeted tissue is subjected to neuromodulating cooling.
Neuromodulation using focused ultrasound energy (e.g., high-intensity focused ultrasound energy) can be beneficial relative to neuromodulation using other treatment modalities. Focused ultrasound is an example of a transducer-based treatment modality that can be delivered from outside the body. Focused ultrasound treatment can be performed in close association with imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance, computed tomography, fluoroscopy, ultrasound (e.g., intravascular or intraluminal), optical coherence tomography, or another suitable imaging modality). For example, imaging can be used to identify an anatomical position of a treatment location (e.g., as a set of coordinates relative to a reference point). The coordinates can then entered into a focused ultrasound device configured to change the power, angle, phase, or other suitable parameters to generate an ultrasound focal zone at the location corresponding to the coordinates. The focal zone can be small enough to localize therapeutically-effective heating at the treatment location while partially or fully avoiding potentially harmful disruption of nearby structures. To generate the focal zone, the ultrasound device can be configured to pass ultrasound energy through a lens, and/or the ultrasound energy can be generated by a curved transducer or by multiple transducers in a phased array (curved or straight).
Heating effects of electrode-based or transducer-based treatment can include ablation and/or non-ablative alteration or damage (e.g., via sustained heating and/or resistive heating). For example, a treatment procedure can include raising the temperature of target neural fibers to a target temperature above a first threshold to achieve non-ablative alteration, or above a second, higher threshold to achieve ablation. The target temperature can be higher than about body temperature (e.g., about 37° C.) but less than about 45° C. for non-ablative alteration, and the target temperature can be higher than about 45° C. for ablation. Heating tissue to a temperature between about body temperature and about 45° C. can induce non-ablative alteration, for example, via moderate heating of target neural fibers or of vascular or luminal structures that perfuse the target neural fibers. In cases where vascular structures are affected, the target neural fibers can be denied perfusion resulting in necrosis of the neural tissue. Heating tissue to a target temperature higher than about 45° C. (e.g., higher than about 60° C.) can induce ablation, for example, via substantial heating of target neural fibers or of vascular or luminal structures that perfuse the target fibers. In some patients, it can be desirable to heat tissue to temperatures that are sufficient to ablate the target neural fibers or the vascular or luminal structures, but that are less than about 90° C. (e.g., less than about 85° C., less than about 80° C., or less than about 75° C.).
Renal neuromodulation can include a chemical-based treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Neuromodulation using chemical-based treatment can include delivering one or more chemicals (e.g., drugs or other agents) to tissue at a treatment location in a manner that modulates neural function. The chemical, for example, can be selected to affect the treatment location generally or to selectively affect some structures at the treatment location over other structures. The chemical, for example, can be guanethidine, ethanol, phenol, a neurotoxin, or another suitable agent selected to alter, damage, or disrupt nerves. A variety of suitable techniques can be used to deliver chemicals to tissue at a treatment location. For example, chemicals can be delivered via one or more needles originating outside the body or within the vasculature or other body lumens. In an intravascular example, a catheter can be used to intravascularly position a therapeutic element including a plurality of needles (e.g., micro-needles) that can be retracted or otherwise blocked prior to deployment. In other embodiments, a chemical can be introduced into tissue at a treatment location via simple diffusion through a body lumen wall, electrophoresis, or another suitable mechanism. Similar techniques can be used to introduce chemicals that are not configured to cause neuromodulation, but rather to facilitate neuromodulation via another treatment modality.
Returning to
The stent of stent delivery element 112 may be any balloon expandable stent as known to one of ordinary skill in the art. In one embodiment, for example, the stent is formed from a single wire forming a continuous sinusoid. The stent may include a coating disposed on the surface of the stent. The coating may include a polymer and/or a therapeutic agent. In one embodiment, the coating includes a Biolinx™ polymer blended with a limus drug. In another embodiment, the stent is a drug filled stent having a lumen filled with a therapeutic agent. In still another embodiment, element 112 does not include a stent disposed on the dilatation balloon.
This disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present technology to the precise forms disclosed herein. Although specific embodiments are disclosed herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible without deviating from the present technology, as those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will recognize. In some cases, well-known structures and functions have not been shown and/or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the present technology. Although steps of methods may be presented herein in a particular order, in alternative embodiments the steps may have another suitable order. Similarly, certain aspects of the present technology disclosed in the context of particular embodiments can be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Furthermore, while advantages associated with certain embodiments may have been disclosed in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments can also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages or other advantages disclosed herein to fall within the scope of the present technology. Accordingly, this disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown and/or described herein.
Throughout this disclosure, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in reference to a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Additionally, the terms “comprising” and the like are used throughout this disclosure to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature(s) and/or one or more additional types of features are not precluded. Directional terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “front,” “back,” “vertical,” and “horizontal,” may be used herein to express and clarify the relationship between various elements. It should be understood that such terms do not denote absolute orientation. Reference herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar formulations means that a particular feature, structure, operation, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the present technology. Thus, the appearances of such phrases or formulations herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, various particular features, structures, operations, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of the following applications: (a) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/717,067, filed Oct. 22, 2012;(b) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/793,144, filed Mar. 15, 2013; and(c) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/800,195, filed Mar. 15, 2013. The foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4602624 | Naples et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4649936 | Ungar et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4709698 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4764504 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998923 | Samson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5300068 | Rosar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5322505 | Krause et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5399164 | Snoke et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423744 | Gencheff et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425364 | Imran | Jun 1995 | A |
5437288 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5477856 | Lundquist | Dec 1995 | A |
5484400 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5558643 | Samson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571147 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5599319 | Stevens | Feb 1997 | A |
5599345 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5626576 | Janssen | May 1997 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685868 | Lundquist | Nov 1997 | A |
5688266 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700282 | Zabara | Dec 1997 | A |
5707400 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5772590 | Webster, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871444 | Ouchi | Feb 1999 | A |
5891110 | Larson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893885 | Webster, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916178 | Noone et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931830 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935102 | Bowden et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954719 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009877 | Edwards | Jan 2000 | A |
6024730 | Pagan | Feb 2000 | A |
6048338 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059769 | Lunn et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099524 | Lipson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102890 | Stivland et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117101 | Diederich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135999 | Fanton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6219577 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224592 | Eggers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246914 | de la Rama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251092 | Qin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254588 | Jones et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273876 | Klima et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273886 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283951 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292695 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314325 | Fitz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322558 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387075 | Stivland et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6475209 | Larson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488679 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506189 | Rittman, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6562034 | Edwards et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585718 | Hayzelden et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611720 | Hata et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635054 | Fjield et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656195 | Peters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669670 | Muni et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716207 | Farnholtz | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736835 | Pellegrino et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749560 | Konstorum et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850801 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6885888 | Rezai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893436 | Woodard et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6939346 | Kannenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7058456 | Pierce | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115183 | Larson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119183 | Seed et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128718 | Hojeibane et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149574 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171275 | Hata et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7221979 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276062 | McDaniel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7381200 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390894 | Weinshilboum et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402151 | Rosenman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7520863 | Grewe et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7615067 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617005 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637903 | Lentz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7682319 | Martin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702397 | Fredricks et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708704 | Mitelberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717948 | Demarais et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727187 | Lentz | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744586 | Larson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744856 | DeFilippi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771410 | Venturelli | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771421 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778703 | Gross et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780646 | Farnholtz | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815600 | Al-Marashi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815637 | Ormsby et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833191 | Flach et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7914467 | Layman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947016 | Lentz | May 2011 | B2 |
7989042 | Obara et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043279 | Hisamatsu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8131371 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131372 | Levin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140170 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145317 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150518 | Levin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150519 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150520 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175711 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8376865 | Forster et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020165532 | Hill et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050681 | Pianca et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060858 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030125790 | Fastovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181897 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199863 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040215186 | Cornelius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050080400 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080409 | Young et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050187579 | Danek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228460 | Levin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251094 | Peterson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253680 | Mathews et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004346 | Begg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064055 | Pile-Spellman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064123 | Bonnette et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095029 | Young et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100618 | Chan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100687 | Fahey et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060206150 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224112 | Lentz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271111 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005009 | Larson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049999 | Esch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070213687 | Barlow | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265687 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287955 | Layman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080077119 | Snyder et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097397 | Vrba | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080147001 | Al-Marashi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080287918 | Rosenman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319418 | Chong | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319513 | Pu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090036948 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090125001 | Anderson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157048 | Sutermeister et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090312606 | Dayton et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010526 | Mitusina | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030217 | Mitusina | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057037 | Webler | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069882 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100099952 | Adams | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100073 | Lentz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137860 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137952 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191112 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217184 | Koblish et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222851 | Deem et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222854 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228112 | Von Malmborg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305682 | Furst | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324482 | Farnholtz | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331618 | Galperin | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331776 | Salahieh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110034989 | Al-Marashi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054464 | Werneth et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066105 | Hart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110245808 | Voeller et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276034 | Tomarelli et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288392 | De La Rama et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120101413 | Beetel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123328 | Williams | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130289 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130345 | Levin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136350 | Goshgarian et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143293 | Mauch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172837 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120204387 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232529 | Buckley et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130006238 | Ditter et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140114288 | Beasley et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135736 | Hebert | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142509 | Bonutti et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0348136 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0521595 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0680355 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0787019 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0937481 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0951244 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1334743 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1656963 | May 2006 | EP |
1839697 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1982741 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2106821 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2332607 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2351593 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2398540 | Dec 2011 | EP |
WO-9525472 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9703611 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9736548 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9900060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9911313 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-0122897 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0170114 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-2005041748 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110528 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006041881 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2007008954 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2009108997 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009125575 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2014066432 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014066439 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 56, Jul. 1975, pp. 208-217. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation on Proximal Water and Sodium Reabsorption,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, Apr. 1976, pp. 1104-1107. |
Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., “Loin Pain Hemaluria Syndrome: Pain Control with RFA to the Splanchanic Plexus,” The Pain Clinc, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327. |
Curtis, John J. et al., “Surgical Therapy for Persistent Hypertension After Renal Transplantation” Transplantation, 31:125-128 (1981). |
Dibona, Gerald F. et al., “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, The American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197. |
Dibona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney-Past, Present and Future,” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624. |
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of Complete Renal Denervation and Selective Afferent Renal Denervation on the Hypertension Induced by Intrenal Norepinephrine Infusion in Conscious Rats”, Journal of Hypertension 1989, 7: 447-455. |
Katholi, Richard E., “Renal Nerves in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Experimental Animals and Humans,” Am J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983, the American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14. |
Krum, Henry et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: A Mulitcentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study,” Lancet 2009; 373:1275-81. |
Krum, et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension.” New England Journal of Med, Aug. 2009, 361;9. |
Luippold, Gerd et al., “Chronic Renal Denervation Prevents Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetic Rats”, Nephrol Dial Transplant, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 342-347. |
Mahfoud et al. “Treatment strategies for resistant arterial hypertension” Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:725-731. |
Osborn, et al., “Effect of Renal Nerve Stimulation on Renal Blood Flow Autoregulation and Antinatriuresis During Reductions in Renal Perfusion Pressure,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimentla Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering From Nephritis,” Feb. 27, 1935;443-458. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension,” J. Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30. |
Rocha-Singh, “Catheter-Based Sympathetic Renal Denervation,” Endovascular Today, Aug. 2009. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implictions for an Old Concept,” Hypertension, 2009; 54:1195-1201. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension,” N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): 932-934. |
Smithwick, R.H. et al., “Splanchnicectomy for Essential Hypertension,” Journal Am Med Assn, 1953; 152:1501-1504. |
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators; Krum H, Barman N, Schlaich M, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011 ;57(5):911-917. |
Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, “Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): A Randomised Controlled Trial”; Lancet, Dec. 4, 2010, vol. 376, pp. 1903-1909. |
United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages. |
Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD-Related Pain”, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16:160. |
Wagner, C.D. et al., “Very Low Frequency Oscillations in Arterial Blood Pressure After Autonomic Blockade in Conscious Dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 13159256, Date Mailed: Oct. 17, 2013, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/066248, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 28 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/066256, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 28 pages. |
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765. |
Avitall et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984. |
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page. |
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831. |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages). |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages). |
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002). |
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chronic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, 11 pages. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1802370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages. |
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relief, Time, Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.come/time/printout/0,8816,2103278,00.html>. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages. |
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro Intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management, and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005. |
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003). |
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages. |
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pages. |
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968. |
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,110, filed Aug. 29, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,209, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,233, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,243, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,253, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,255, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,292, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,327, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,335, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,336, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,356, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct—2011.php>. |
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>. |
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension.” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europcr-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>. |
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life—Investor Relations, Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>. |
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media—relations/library/2011/2011-10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>. |
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-news/interventional-news---latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>. |
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages. |
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>. |
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n. l.), 4 pages. |
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million.” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics, Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages, <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>. |
“The Edison AwardsIM” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>. |
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages. |
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages. |
Asbell, Penny, “Conductive Keratoplasty for the Correction of Hyperopia.” Tr Am Ophth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages. |
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages. |
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages. |
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997). |
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages. |
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global Symplicity registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=83002>. |
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages. |
Dibona, G.F. “Sympathetic nervous system and kidney in hypertension.” Nephrol and Hypertension, 11: 197-200 (2002). |
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998). |
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; Mailed on Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages. |
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertension.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages. |
Gertner, Jon, “Meet the Tech Duo That's Revitalizing the Medical Device Industry.” Fast Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 AM, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>. |
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Renal Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997). |
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol,174: 1592-1594 (2000). |
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery ebolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001). |
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994). |
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages. |
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Huang et al., “Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats.” Hypertension 32 (1998) pp. 249-254. |
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honour for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>. |
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>. |
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531. 2:527-534 (2001). |
Lee, S.J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J, 40:545-549 (1999). |
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages. |
Lustgarten, D.L.,et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999). |
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Circulation, 2013, 25 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages. |
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page. |
Medtronic, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages. |
Millard, F. C., et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-734, (1989). |
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:II-17-II-21 (1992). |
Ong, K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006). |
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShotIM renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013, 4 pages. |
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal denervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trial.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 5 pages. |
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012: Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Daily, Oct. 26, 2012, 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=80880>. |
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68. |
Renal Denervation (RDN), Symplicity RDN System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rdn/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf. |
Schauerte, P., et al. “Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.” Circulation, 102:2774-2780 (2000). |
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages. |
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH position paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Sievert, Horst, “Novelty Award EuroPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages. |
Solis-Herruzo et al., “Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome,” J. Hepatol. 5 (1987), pp. 167-173. |
Stella, A., et al., “Effects of reversible renal deneravation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4:181-188 (1986). |
Stouffer, G. A. et al., Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages. |
Swartz, J.F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87: 487-499 (1993). |
Uchida, F., et al., “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998). |
Verloop, W. L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Heart J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>. |
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium rentention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996). |
Wilcox, Josiah N., Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012, Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages. |
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages. |
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages. |
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Healio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages. |
Miller, Reed, “Finding a Future for Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials.” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence, Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014, 4 pages. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN I First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt Is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140114287 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61717067 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61793144 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61800195 | Mar 2013 | US |