Catheters with enhanced flexibility and associated devices, systems, and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9044575
  • Patent Number
    9,044,575
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 2, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A neuromodulation catheter includes an elongate shaft and a neuromodulation element. The shaft includes two or more first cut shapes and two or more second cut shapes along a helical path extending around a longitudinal axis of the shaft. The first cut shapes are configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to longitudinal compression and tension on the shaft and torsion on the shaft in a first circumferential direction. The second cut shapes are configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to longitudinal compression on the shaft and torsion on the shaft in both first and second opposite circumferential directions.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present technology is related to catheters. In particular, at least some embodiments are related to neuromodulation catheters having one or more cuts and/or other features that enhance flexibility, such as to facilitate intravascular delivery via transradial or other suitable percutaneous transluminal approaches.


BACKGROUND

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is a primarily involuntary bodily control system typically associated with stress responses. Fibers of the SNS extend through tissue in almost every organ system of the human body and can affect characteristics such as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. Such regulation can have adaptive utility in maintaining homeostasis or in preparing the body for rapid response to environmental factors. Chronic activation of the SNS, however, is a common maladaptive response that can drive the progression of many disease states. Excessive activation of the renal SNS in particular has been identified experimentally and in humans as a likely contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (e.g., heart failure), and progressive renal disease.


Sympathetic nerves of the kidneys terminate in the renal blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and the renal tubules, among other structures. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves can cause, for example, increased renin release, increased sodium reabsorption, and reduced renal blood flow. These and other neural-regulated components of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone. For example, reduced renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate as a result of renal sympathetic efferent stimulation is likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome, (i.e., renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure). Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal sympathetic stimulation include centrally-acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (e.g., to reduce renin release), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (e.g., to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release), and diuretics (e.g., to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). These pharmacologic strategies, however, have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects, and others.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many aspects of the present technology can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed on illustrating clearly the principles of the present technology. For ease of reference, throughout this disclosure identical reference numbers may be used to identify identical or at least generally similar or analogous components or features.



FIG. 1 is a partially schematic perspective view illustrating a therapeutic system including a neuromodulation catheter configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present technology.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged partially cut-away side view of a shaft of the neuromodulation catheter shown in FIG. 1 illustrating a hypotube of the shaft and a cut extending along a helical path having varying pitch along the length of the shaft.



FIG. 3 is a two-dimensional representation of the helical path shown in FIG. 2 and a portion of the shaft shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a two-dimensional representation of the cut shown in FIG. 2 along a first portion of the helical path shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a two-dimensional representation of the cut shown in FIG. 2 along a second portion of the helical path shown in FIG. 3.



FIGS. 6-9B are two-dimensional representations of cuts along portions of helical paths configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIGS. 10-12 are perspective views of shaft segments having guide wire exit openings with different positions relative to cuts configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIGS. 13 and 14 are perspective views of shaft segments including helically wound elongate members configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIGS. 15 and 16 are side profile views of helically wound elongate members having windings with different average helix angles configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 17 is a side profile view of a helically wound elongate member having windings with different average helix angles on either side of a transition region configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present technology.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology include elongate shafts having one or more cuts and/or other features that enhance flexibility without unduly compromising desirable axial stiffness (e.g., pushability or other responsiveness to axial force) and/or desirable torsional stiffness (e.g., torqueability or other responsiveness to torsional force). For example, a neuromodulation catheter configured in accordance with a particular embodiment of the present technology is sufficiently flexible in some respects to facilitate deployment via a relatively long and/or tortuous intravascular path without excessive resistance, while still being sufficiently stiff in other respects so as to allow intravascular navigation or other suitable manipulation via an extracorporeal handle. Desirable axial stiffness can include, for example, the capability of the shaft to be advanced or withdrawn along the length of an intravascular path without significantly buckling or elongating. Desirable torsional stiffness can include, for example, the capability of the shaft to distally transfer rotational motion (e.g., from a handle at a proximal end portion of the shaft to a neuromodulation element operably connected to the shaft via a distal end portion of the shaft) with close correspondence (e.g., at least about one-to-one correspondence). In addition or alternatively, desirable torsional stiffness can include the capability of the shaft to distally transfer rotational motion without causing whipping and/or diametrical deformation of the shaft. Desirable axial and torsional stiffness together can facilitate predictable and controlled transmission of axial and torsional force from the proximal end portion of the shaft toward the distal end portion of the shaft while a neuromodulation catheter is in use.


Metal hypodermic (needle) tubing, aka hypotubing, is commonly incorporated into small-diameter shafts of medical catheters to utilize the wire-like physical properties of such material along with the useable lumen extending therethrough. However, solid-walled metal tubing also has known limitations regarding flexibility and kink resistance, and various designs have utilized slits, slots or other openings in the tubing wall to achieve improvements in flexibility. Such modifications to the wall structure have always brought about compromises in physical properties in tension, compression, and torsion. Thus, in at least some conventional neuromodulation catheters, imparting flexibility can require unduly sacrificing axial stiffness and/or torsional stiffness. For example, creating a continuous helical cut in a relatively rigid hypotube of a shaft tends to increase the flexibility of the shaft, but, in some instances, the resulting coils between turns of the cut may also tend to separate to an undesirable degree in response to tension on the shaft and/or torsion on the shaft in at least one circumferential direction. In some cases, this separation can cause a permanent or temporary change in the length of the shaft (e.g., undesirable elongation of the shaft), a permanent or temporary diametrical deformation of the shaft (e.g., undesirable flattening of a cross-section of the shaft), and/or torsional whipping. Such shaft behavior can interfere with intravascular navigation and/or have other undesirable effects on neuromodulation procedures.


Due, at least in part, to enhanced flexibility in combination with desirable axial and torsional stiffness, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well-suited for intravascular delivery to treatment locations (e.g., treatment locations within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient) via transradial approaches (e.g., approaches that include the radial artery, the subclavian artery, and the descending aorta). Transradial approaches are typically more tortuous and longer than femoral approaches and at least some other commonly used approaches. Transradial approaches can be desirable for accessing certain anatomy, but other types of approaches (e.g., femoral approaches) may be desirable in particularly tortuous anatomy or vessels having relatively small diameters. In some instances, however, use of transradial approaches can provide certain advantages over use of femoral approaches. In some cases, for example, use of transradial approaches can be associated with increased patient comfort, decreased bleeding, and/or faster sealing of the percutaneous puncture site relative to use of femoral approaches.


In addition to or instead of facilitating intravascular delivery via transradial approaches, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well suited for intravascular delivery via one or more other suitable approaches, such as other suitable approaches that are shorter or longer than transradial approaches and other suitable approaches that are less tortuous or more tortuous than transradial approaches. For example, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be well suited for intravascular delivery via brachial approaches and/or femoral approaches. Even when used with approaches that are generally shorter and/or less tortuous than transradial approaches, the combination of flexibility and desirable axial and torsional stiffness associated with neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can be beneficial, such as to accommodate anatomical differences between patients and/or to reduce vessel trauma during delivery, among other potential benefits.


Specific details of several embodiments of the present technology are described herein with reference to FIGS. 1-17. Although many of the embodiments are described herein with respect to devices, systems, and methods for intravascular renal neuromodulation, other applications and other embodiments in addition to those described herein are within the scope of the present technology. For example, at least some embodiments may be useful for intraluminal neuromodulation, for extravascular neuromodulation, for non-renal neuromodulation, and/or for use in therapies other than neuromodulation. It should be noted that other embodiments in addition to those disclosed herein are within the scope of the present technology. For example, in still other embodiments, the technology described herein may be used in devices, systems and methods for stent delivery and balloon angioplasty. Further, embodiments of the present technology can have different configurations, components, and/or procedures than those shown or described herein. Moreover, a person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that embodiments of the present technology can have configurations, components, and/or procedures in addition to those shown or described herein and that these and other embodiments can be without several of the configurations, components, and/or procedures shown or described herein without deviating from the present technology.


As used herein, the terms “distal” and “proximal” define a position or direction with respect to a clinician or a clinician's control device (e.g., a handle of a neuromodulation catheter). The terms, “distal” and “distally” refer to a position distant from or in a direction away from a clinician or a clinician's control device. The terms “proximal” and “proximally” refer to a position near or in a direction toward a clinician or a clinician's control device. The headings provided herein are for convenience only and should not be construed as limiting the subject matter disclosed.


Selected Examples of Neuromodulation Catheters and Related Devices



FIG. 1 is a partially schematic perspective view illustrating a therapeutic system 100 configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present technology. The system 100 can include a neuromodulation catheter 102, a console 104, and a cable 106 extending therebetween. The neuromodulation catheter 102 can include an elongate shaft 108 having a proximal end portion 108a and a distal end portion 108b. A handle 110 of the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be operably connected to the shaft 108 via the proximal end portion 108a, and a neuromodulation element 112 of the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be operably connected to the shaft 108 via the distal end portion 108b. The shaft 108 can be configured to locate the neuromodulation element 112 intravascularly at a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a body lumen (e.g., a blood vessel, a duct, an airway, or another naturally occurring lumen within the human body), and the neuromodulation element 112 can be configured to provide or support a neuromodulation treatment at the treatment location. The shaft 108 and the neuromodulation element 112 can be 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 French or one or more other suitable sizes.


In some embodiments, intravascular delivery of the neuromodulation catheter 102 includes percutaneously inserting a guide wire (not shown) into a body lumen of a patient and moving the shaft 108 and the neuromodulation element 112 along the guide wire until the neuromodulation element 112 reaches a suitable treatment location. In other embodiments, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be a steerable or non-steerable device configured for use without a guide wire. In still other embodiments, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be configured for delivery via a guide catheter or sheath (not shown).


The console 104 can be configured to control, monitor, supply, and/or otherwise support operation of the neuromodulation catheter 102. Alternatively, the neuromodulation catheter 102 can be self-contained or otherwise configured for operation without connection to the console 104. When present, the console 104 can be configured to generate a selected form and/or magnitude of energy for delivery to tissue at the treatment location via the neuromodulation element 112 (e.g., via one or more energy delivery elements (not shown) of the neuromodulation element 112). The console 104 can have different configurations depending on the treatment modality of the neuromodulation catheter 102. When the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for electrode-based, heat-element-based, or transducer-based treatment, for example, the console 104 can include an energy generator (not shown) configured to generate radio frequency (RF) energy (e.g., monopolar and/or bipolar RF energy), pulsed energy, microwave energy, optical energy, ultrasound energy (e.g., intravascularly delivered ultrasound, extracorporeal ultrasound, and/or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)), cryotherapeutic energy, direct heat energy, chemicals (e.g., drugs and/or other agents), radiation (e.g., infrared, visible, and/or gamma radiation), and/or another suitable type of energy. When the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for cryotherapeutic treatment, for example, the console 104 can include a refrigerant reservoir (not shown) and can be configured to supply the neuromodulation catheter 102 with refrigerant. Similarly, when the neuromodulation catheter 102 is configured for chemical-based treatment (e.g., drug infusion), the console 104 can include a chemical reservoir (not shown) and can be configured to supply the neuromodulation catheter 102 with one or more chemicals.


In some embodiments, the system 100 includes a control device 114 along the cable 106. The control device 114 can be configured to initiate, terminate, and/or adjust operation of one or more components of the neuromodulation catheter 102 directly and/or via the console 104. In other embodiments, the control device 114 can be absent or have another suitable location (e.g., within the handle 110). The console 104 can be configured to execute an automated control algorithm 116 and/or to receive control instructions from an operator. Furthermore, the console 104 can be configured to provide feedback to an operator before, during, and/or after a treatment procedure via an evaluation/feedback algorithm 118.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged partially cut-away side view of the shaft 108 illustrating a hypotube 120 concentrically disposed within an outside wall 121. The hypotube 120 can be configured to reinforce the shaft 108 against collapsing from lateral compression. For example, the hypotube 120 can be made of a relatively strong material (e.g., nitinol, stainless steel, or another suitable metal). The hypotube 120 may be disposed within all or a portion of the shaft 108. In some embodiments, for example, the hypotube 120 may only be disposed at a distal section of the shaft 108, and a proximal section of the shaft 108 may have a different arrangement and/or configuration. Tubes made of relatively strong materials tend to be relatively stiff (e.g., resistant to bending) when unmodified. To increase the flexibility of the neuromodulation catheter 102, the shaft 108 can include a cut 122 extending at least partially through a wall thickness of the hypotube 120, the outside wall 121, or another suitable portion of the shaft 108. For example, the shaft 108 can have a longitudinal axis 124 and the cut 122 can follow a helical path 126 that extends about the longitudinal axis 124 (e.g., a coiled, spiral, or other similar form having two or more turns consistently or variably spaced along the longitudinal axis 124). The cut 122 can be continuous or discontinuous along the helical path 126. Furthermore, the shaft 108 can be cut along more than one helical path 126 (e.g., a double helix having two or more helical paths 126 having the same “hand” or chirality and spaced apart along the longitudinal axis 124). The cut 122 can be formed, for example, using laser etching, electrical discharge machining, chemical etching, or other suitable techniques.



FIG. 3 is a two-dimensional representation of the helical path 126. In particular, FIG. 3 is a representation of the helical path 126 and a portion of the shaft 108 with the x-axis in FIG. 3 corresponding to the longitudinal axis 124 along at least a portion of the length of the shaft 108 and the y-axis in FIG. 3 corresponding to the circumference of the shaft 108. In other words, FIG. 3 illustrates the helical path 126 as though at least a portion of the shaft 108 were aligned with the x-axis and rolled along the y-axis with the helical path 126 unwinding to a flat ribbon or making an imprinted image as the shaft 108 is rolled. The helical path 126 can include a first portion 126a, a second portion 126b, and a third portion 126c therebetween. The first portion 126a, the second portion 126b, and the third portion 126c can extend around portions of the longitudinal axis 124 corresponding to a first segment 127a, a second segment 127b, and a third segment 127c of the shaft 108, respectively. In some embodiments, the first segment 127a is distal to the second and third segments 127b, 127c, and the third segment 127c is between the first and second segments 127a, 127b. In other embodiments, the first, second, and third segments 127a-c can be reversed or have another suitable arrangement. The first, second, and third segments 127a-c can be directly adjacent to one another or spaced apart from one another along the longitudinal axis 124. Furthermore, the first segment 127a can be directly adjacent to or spaced apart from a distalmost portion of the shaft 108 (e.g., a junction between the shaft 108 and the neuromodulation element 112), and the second segment 127b can be directly adjacent to or spaced apart from a proximalmost portion of the shaft 108 (e.g., a junction between the shaft 108 and the handle 110).


As shown in FIG. 3, the first, second, and third portions 126a-126c of the helical path 126 can have different slopes when transposed two-dimensionally. These slopes can correspond to the axial density (e.g., frequency or pitch angle) of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 along the longitudinal axis 124. For example, the first portion 126a of the helical path 126 can have a greater slope than the second portion 126b, and the third portion 126c can be curved with a slope that gradually transitions between the slopes of the first and second portions 126a, 126b. Accordingly, the cut 122 can have a greater axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features along a portion of the longitudinal axis 124 corresponding to the first segment 127a than along a portion of the longitudinal axis 124 corresponding to the second segment 127b. Similarly, the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 along the longitudinal axis 124 can increase gradually or in another suitable manner along the third segment 127c from the second segment 127b toward the first segment 127a. For example, gradually increasing or otherwise transitioning the axial density of turns, shapes, slope, type, size/dimension, or other suitable features of the cut 122 may reduce focused stress on the shaft 108, which can reduce or eliminate kinking or other undesirable behavior of the shaft 108 when it bends.


By varying the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122, different segments of the shaft 108 can have different levels of flexibility. For example, with reference to FIGS. 1-3 together, a greater axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features can correspond to greater flexibility than a lesser axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features. In some cases, a distance along the longitudinal axis 124 between the neuromodulation element 112 and a cut segment of the shaft 108 (e.g., the first, second, or third segment 127a-c) can be selected such that the cut segment tends to be disposed in or near a particular anatomical location when the neuromodulation catheter 102 is in use. For example, the distance along the longitudinal axis 124 between the neuromodulation element 112 and the cut segment can be selected such that the cut segment tends to be at least proximate to a relatively sharply angled or otherwise relatively tortuous anatomic region of an approach (e.g., a transradial or other suitable approach) when the neuromodulation element 112 is at a selected treatment location (e.g., a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient). The relatively sharply angled or otherwise relatively tortuous region, for example, can be a region within or otherwise proximate to a subclavian artery (e.g., a portion of a subclavian artery adjacent to the descending aorta), an ostium of a renal artery, or another suitable anatomical feature. The axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 along different segments of the shaft 108 and the relative flexibilities of the different segments can be selected to facilitate transradial catheterization or deployment of the neuromodulation catheter 102 via another suitable approach. In some embodiments, an axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 along the longitudinal axis 124 varies along the length of the shaft 108 (e.g., to tailor the shaft 108 to the tortuosity or other geometry of different portions of a transradial or other suitable approach). In other embodiments, the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 along the longitudinal axis 124 can be consistent along the length of the shaft 108 (e.g., to increase the overall flexibility of the shaft 108).



FIG. 4 is a two-dimensional representation of the cut 122 along the first portion 126a of the helical path 126. Such a two-dimensional representation is as if the shaft were rolled over a flat surface to leave an imprint of the cut shape therein. In some instances, these two dimensional representations can be used as input for an automated manufacturing process used to form cut shapes along a path in a tubular workpiece. With reference to FIGS. 2-4 together, the shaft 108 can include two or more first cut shapes 128 and two or more second cut shapes 130 interspersed along the helical path 126, with the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 forming portions of the cut 122. The first cut shapes 128 can be configured to at least partially interlock to thereby resist deformation in response to a set of three types of force acting on the shaft 108, and the second cut shapes 130 can be configured to at least partially interlock to thereby resist deformation in response to a different, complementary set of three types of force acting on the shaft 108. The sets can be different combinations of (a) compression along the longitudinal axis 124, (b) tension along the longitudinal axis 124, (c) torsion in a first circumferential direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 124, and (d) torsion in a second, opposite circumferential direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 124. For example, the first cut shapes 128 can be configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to compression on the shaft 108, tension on the shaft 108, and torsion on the shaft 108 in the first circumferential direction, and the second cut shapes 130 can be configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to compression on the shaft 108, torsion on the shaft 108 in the first circumferential direction, and torsion on the shaft 108 in a second circumferential direction opposite to the first circumferential direction. The first cut shapes 128 can be less resistant to deformation in response to torsion on the shaft 108 in the second circumferential direction than the second cut shapes 130. Similarly, the second cut shapes 130 can be less resistant to deformation in response to tension on the shaft 108 than the first cut shapes 128. Working together, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can provide the shaft 108 with sufficient resistance to deformation in response to all types of axial and torsional force that may act on the shaft 108 during use of the neuromodulation catheter 102.


In some embodiments, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 are sinusoidal and have amplitudes with different (e.g., perpendicular) orientations relative to the longitudinal axis 124. In other embodiments, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can have other suitable forms. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the first cut shapes 128 can individually include a first peak 132 (e.g., a first finger) and a second peak 134 (e.g., a second finger) with a first interface 136 therebetween. The first interface 136 can be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 124 (FIG. 2). The second cut shapes 130 can individually include a third peak 138 (e.g., a third finger) and a fourth peak 140 (e.g., a fourth finger) with a second interface 142 therebetween. The second interface 142 can be parallel to the longitudinal axis 124. Alternatively, the first and second interfaces 136, 142 can have other suitable angles relative to the longitudinal axis 124, such as other suitable angles in which an angle between the first interface 136 and the longitudinal axis 124 is greater than an angle between the second interface 142 and the longitudinal axis 124. The first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can be configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to forces perpendicular to the first and second interfaces 136, 142, respectively. For example, such forces can cause the first and second peaks 132, 134 or the third and fourth peaks 138, 140 to at least partially interlock and thereby prevent or reduce widening of the cut 122.



FIG. 5 is a two-dimensional representation of the cut 122 along the second portion 126b of the helical path 126. With reference to FIGS. 2, 3 and 5 together, an average length of the first interfaces 136, an average length of the second interfaces 142, or both can be different at different portions of the helical path 126. For example, the average length of the second interfaces 142 can be greater among the second cut shapes 130 along the second portion 126b of the helical path 126 and the second segment 127b of the shaft 108 than among the second cut shapes 130 along the first portion 126a of the helical path 126 and the first segment 127a of the shaft 108. In some cases, the average length of the first interfaces 136, the second interfaces 142, or both are selected based on different axial densities of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of the cut 122 at different segments of the shaft 108. For example, when the axial density is greater, the lengths of the first and second interfaces 136, 142 can be more restricted than when the axial density is lower (e.g., so as to avoid overlapping at adjacent turns).



FIGS. 6-9B are two-dimensional representations of cuts along portions of helical paths configured in accordance with further embodiments of the present technology. As shown in FIG. 6, for example, in some embodiments a shaft 108 includes an uncut region 144 with the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 positioned along portions of a helical path on either side of the uncut region 144. For example, the uncut region 144 can be one of many uncut regions 144 interspersed among the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 along the helical path. In other embodiments, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can be portions of a continuous cut. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can be in suitable patterns along the helical path other than one-to-one alternating patterns. Suitable patterns can include, for example, random patterns, non-random patterns, two-to-one alternating patterns, two-to-two alternating patterns, and three-to-two alternating patterns, among others. Furthermore, the spacing between adjacent first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can be consistent or variable.


Referring next to FIG. 8, a shaft can include two or more third cut shapes 146 and two or more fourth cut shapes 148 interspersed along a helical path. The individual third cut shapes 146 can be configured to fully interlock rather than partially interlock. For example, the individual third cut shapes 146 can be configured to at least partially resist deformation in response to compression on the shaft, tension on the shaft, torsion on the shaft in the first circumferential direction, and torsion on the shaft in the second circumferential direction. The shaft, for example, can include tabs 149 (e.g., protrusions, lobes, or other suitable structures) adjacent to the third cut shapes 146, with the third cut shapes 146 forming recesses complementary to the tabs 149. The individual tabs 149 can include a flared portion 149a (e.g., a rounded head portion) and a restricted portion 149b (e.g., a rounded neck portion), or other suitable structures. The fourth cut shapes 148 can be sinusoidal and have amplitudes oriented perpendicularly to the helical path. For example, the individual fourth cut shapes 148 can include a first peak 150 and a second peak 152 with an interface 154 therebetween that is diagonal relative to a longitudinal axis of the shaft and perpendicular to the helical path.


As shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B, in some embodiments a shaft includes the third cut shapes 146 without the fourth cut shapes 148. Referring to FIG. 9B, for example, the shaft includes tabs 302 adjacent to respective third cut shapes 300. The individual tabs 302 and corresponding third cut shapes 300, for example, can comprise a wedge-shaped arrangement with the tabs 302 including a wedge-shaped portion 304 (i.e., a “tail”) and a restricted neck portion 306, while the complementary third cut shapes 300 form recesses or sockets (i.e., “tail sockets”) complementary to the tabs 302. In some embodiments, the tabs 302 and third cut shapes 300 may fit snugly with very little room between the respective portions of the two components. In other embodiments, however, there may be some space between at least a portion of each wedge-shaped portion 304 and the complementary socket portion to allow some amount of relative movement between the components.


In other embodiments, the shaft can include the fourth cut shapes 148 without the third cut shapes 146. Although the third and fourth cut shapes 146, 148 are potentially useful alone or in combination with other cut shapes, it is expected that combinations of the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 may be more stable than the third and fourth cut shapes 146, 148 alone or in combination during use of a neuromodulation catheter. For example, is it expected that combinations of cut shapes that impart resistance to complementary sets of fewer than all types of axial and torsional force that may act on a shaft during use of a neuromodulation catheter may facilitate dissipation of localized stresses along a cut. It will further be appreciated that catheters configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include various combinations of cut shapes tailored to provide a desired level of flexibility and/or control for different applications.



FIGS. 10-12 are perspective views of shaft segments having guide wire exit openings with different positions relative to cuts. For example, with reference to FIGS. 5 and 10, in some embodiments a shaft segment 156 having the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 has a guide wire exit opening 158 in place of a third peak 138 of one of the second cut shapes 130. In other embodiments, the guide wire exit opening 158 can be in place of the first peak 132, the second peak 134, the fourth peak 140, or a combination thereof including or not including the third peak 138. As another example, with reference to FIGS. 5 and 11, a shaft segment 160 having the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 can have a guide wire exit opening 162 between (e.g., about evenly between) adjacent turns of a helical path along which the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 are distributed. As yet another example, with reference to FIGS. 5, 6 and 12, a shaft segment 164 having the first and second cut shapes 128, 130 and the uncut region 146 (e.g., as described above with reference to FIG. 6) can have a guide wire exit opening 166 at the uncut region 146. In other examples, the guide wire exit openings may have other suitable positions relative to the cuts. Furthermore, although the guide wire exit openings 158, 162, 166 are illustrated in FIGS. 10-12 as generally oval with their longitudinal axes aligned with longitudinal axes of the corresponding shaft segments 156, 160, 164, the guide wire exit openings 158, 162, 166 can have other suitable shapes and/or orientations.


Instead of or in addition to a cut tube, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can include one or more elongate members (e.g., filaments, wires, ribbons, or other suitable structures) helically wound into one or more tubular shapes. Similar to the axial density of turns, shapes, or other suitable features of a cut along a longitudinal axis of a shaft (e.g., as discussed above with reference to FIG. 3), the axial density of windings of a helically wound elongate member along a longitudinal axis of a shaft can be selected to change the flexibility of the shaft. For example, an axial density of windings along a longitudinal axis of a shaft can be selected to facilitate intravascular delivery of a neuromodulation element to a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient via a transradial or other suitable approach. In some embodiments, an axial density of windings along a longitudinal axis of a shaft varies along the length of the shaft (e.g., to tailor the shaft to the tortuosity or other geometry of different portions of a transradial or other suitable approach). In other embodiments, the axial density of windings along a longitudinal axis of a shaft can be consistent along the length of the shaft (e.g., to increase the overall flexibility of the shaft).



FIGS. 13 and 14 are perspective views of shaft segments including helically wound elongate members configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. With reference to FIG. 13, a shaft 168 can include a first helically wound elongate member 170 having a series of first windings 172 at least partially forming a first tubular structure 174. The shaft 168 can further include a second helically wound elongate member 176 having a series of second windings 178 at least partially forming a second tubular structure 180. The first tubular structure 174 can be disposed within the second tubular structure 180, and the first and second tubular structures 174, 180 can be concentric.


In some embodiments, at least one of the first and second helically wound elongate members 170, 176 is multifilar. For example, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 13, the second helically wound elongate member 176 is multifilar with five parallel filaments (individually identified in FIG. 13 as 176a-e), and the first helically wound elongate member 170 is monofilar. In other embodiments, the second helically wound elongate member 176 can be monofilar and the first helically wound elongate member 170 can be multifilar. In still other embodiments, both the first and second helically wound elongate members 170, 176 can be monofilar or multifilar. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the first windings 172, the second windings 178, or both are “openly wound” or spaced apart along a longitudinal axis of the shaft 168. For example, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 13, the second windings 178 are shown spaced apart along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 168 with gaps 181 between adjacent second windings 178, and the first windings 172 are shown not spaced apart along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 168. In other embodiments, the second windings 178 can be not spaced apart along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 168 and the first windings 172 can be spaced apart along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 168. In still other embodiments, both the first and second windings 172, 178 can be spaced apart or not spaced apart along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 168.


With reference to FIG. 14, a shaft 182 can include a third helically wound elongate member 183 having a series of third windings 184 at least partially forming a third tubular structure 186. The first and second tubular structures 174, 180 can be disposed within the third tubular structure 186, and the first, second, and third tubular structures 174, 180, 186 can be concentric. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 14, the third helically wound elongate member 183 is multifilar with parallel filaments (individually identified in FIG. 14 as 183a-e). In other embodiments, the third helically wound elongate member 183 can be monofilar. Furthermore, in embodiments having more than one helically wound layer, the layers may be counter-wound, e.g. a right-hand helical layer may surround a left-hand helical layer. The shaft 182 can further include biocompatible jacket 188 at least partially encasing the first, second, and third tubular structures 174, 180, 186. The biocompatible jacket 188, for example, can be at least partially made of a smooth polymer or other suitable material well suited for sliding contact with an inner wall of a body lumen.



FIG. 15 is a side profile view of a helically wound elongate member 190 having a series of windings 192 with an average helix angle A1. FIG. 16 is a side profile view of a helically wound elongate member 194 having a series of windings 196 with an average helix angle A2. With reference to FIGS. 14-16 together, the first windings 172, the second windings 178, the third windings 184, or a subset thereof, can have different average helix angles. For example, a first average helix angle of the first windings 172 can be different than a second average helix angle of the second windings 178 by an angle within a range from about 10 degrees to about 140 degrees (e.g., a range from about 30 degrees to about 120 degrees, or another suitable range). Similarly, the first average helix angle of the first windings 172 can be different than a third average helix angle of the third windings 184 by an angle within a range from about 10 degrees to about 140 degrees (e.g., a range from about 30 degrees to about 120 degrees, or another suitable range) and the second average helix angle of the second windings 178 can be between (e.g., about midway between) the first and third average helix angles of the first and third windings 172, 184, respectively.



FIG. 17 is a side profile view of a helically wound elongate member 198 having a series of windings 200 with different average helix angles and opposite chirality on either side of a transition region 202. Although an abrupt change in average helix angle at the transition region 202 is shown in FIG. 17, the change at the transition region 202 can alternatively be gradual or incremental. With reference to FIGS. 14, 15 and 17 together, in some embodiments the first windings 172, the second windings 178, and/or the third windings 184 include one or more transition regions 202. In other embodiments, the first windings 172, the second windings 178, and the third windings 184 can have consistent helix angles along the length of the shaft 168. Including one or more transition regions 202 can be useful, for example, to allow a difference between average helix angles of windings within concentric tubular structures to vary (e.g., to change at least once) along the length of the shaft 168. For example, this difference can decrease (e.g., abruptly, gradually, or incrementally) distally along the length of the shaft 168. It is expected that increasing a difference between average helix angles of windings within concentric tubular structures may reduce flexibility and increase axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft, and that decreasing a difference between average helix angles of windings within concentric tubular structures may increase flexibility and decrease axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft. Accordingly, the positions of the transition regions 202 can be selected to change the flexibility of the shaft relative to the axial and torsional stiffness of the shaft along the length of a shaft (e.g., to facilitate intravascular delivery of a neuromodulation element to a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient via a transradial or other suitable approach).


Instead of or in addition to a cut tube and/or a helically wound elongate member, neuromodulation catheters configured in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology can include shafts having one or more segments with different shape memory properties. With reference to FIG. 3, for example, the first segment 127a can be made at least partially of a first shape-memory alloy, the second segment 127b can be made at least partially of a second shape-memory alloy, and the third segment 127c can be made at least partially of a third shape-memory alloy. The first, second, and third shape-memory alloys can be different or the same. In some embodiments, the first, second, and third shape-memory alloys are nitinol. In other embodiments, the first, second, and third shape-memory alloys can be other suitable materials. The first, second, and third shape-memory alloys can have first, second, and third shape-memory transformation temperature ranges, respectively. For example, when the first, second, and third shape-memory alloys are nitinol, the first, second, and third shape-memory transformation temperature ranges can include Af temperatures.


The second shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of the second shape-memory transformation temperature range can be lower than the first shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of the first shape-memory transformation temperature range. For example, the first shape-memory transformation temperature range can include an Af temperature greater than body temperature and the second shape-memory transformation temperature range includes an Af temperature less than body temperature. A shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or an Af temperature of a shape-memory transformation temperature range of the shaft 108 can increase (e.g., abruptly, gradually, or incrementally) along the third segment 127c from the second segment 127b toward the first segment 127a. In some embodiments, to vary the shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures along the length of the shaft 108, the first, second, and third segments 127a-c are formed separately and then joined. In other embodiments, the shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or the Af temperatures along the length of the shaft 108 can be achieved by processing the first, second, and third segments 127a-c differently while they are joined. For example, one of the first, second, and third segments 127a-c can be subjected to a heat treatment to change its shape-memory transformation temperature range and/or Af temperature while the others of the first, second, and third segments 127a-c are thermally insulated.


It is expected that greater shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges may increase flexibility and decrease axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft (e.g., by causing nitinol to tend to assume a austenite phase at body temperature), and that lower shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges may decrease flexibility and increase axial and torsional stiffness of a shaft (e.g., by causing nitinol to tend to assume a martensite phase at body temperature). Accordingly, the positions of segments of a shaft having different shape-memory transformation temperature ranges and/or Af temperatures of shape-memory transformation temperature ranges can be selected to change the flexibility of the shaft relative to the axial and torsional stiffness of the shaft along the length of a shaft (e.g., to facilitate intravascular delivery of a neuromodulation element to a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a renal artery of a human patient via a transradial or other suitable approach).


Renal Neuromodulation


Renal neuromodulation is the partial or complete incapacitation or other effective disruption of nerves of the kidneys (e.g., nerves terminating in the kidneys or in structures closely associated with the kidneys). In particular, renal neuromodulation can include inhibiting, reducing, and/or blocking neural communication along neural fibers (e.g., efferent and/or afferent neural fibers) of the kidneys. Such incapacitation can be long-term (e.g., permanent or for periods of months, years, or decades) or short-term (e.g., for periods of minutes, hours, days, or weeks). Renal neuromodulation is expected to contribute to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone or drive and/or to benefit at least some specific organs and/or other bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves. Accordingly, renal neuromodulation is expected to be useful in treating clinical conditions associated with systemic sympathetic overactivity or hyperactivity, particularly conditions associated with central sympathetic overstimulation. For example, renal neuromodulation is expected to efficaciously treat hypertension, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic and end stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, polycystic kidney disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, osteoporosis, erectile dysfunction, and sudden death, among other conditions.


Renal neuromodulation can be electrically-induced, thermally-induced, chemically-induced, or induced in another suitable manner or combination of manners at one or more suitable treatment locations during a treatment procedure. The treatment location can be within or otherwise proximate to a renal lumen (e.g., a renal artery, a ureter, a renal pelvis, a major renal calyx, a minor renal calyx, or another suitable structure), and the treated tissue can include tissue at least proximate to a wall of the renal lumen. For example, with regard to a renal artery, a treatment procedure can include modulating nerves in the renal plexus, which lay intimately within or adjacent to the adventitia of the renal artery.


Renal neuromodulation can include a cryotherapeutic treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Cryotherapeutic treatment can include cooling tissue at a treatment location in a manner that modulates neural function. For example, sufficiently cooling at least a portion of a sympathetic renal nerve can slow or potentially block conduction of neural signals to produce a prolonged or permanent reduction in renal sympathetic activity. This effect can occur as a result of cryotherapeutic tissue damage, which can include, for example, direct cell injury (e.g., necrosis), vascular or luminal injury (e.g., starving cells from nutrients by damaging supplying blood vessels), and/or sublethal hypothermia with subsequent apoptosis. Exposure to cryotherapeutic cooling can cause acute cell death (e.g., immediately after exposure) and/or delayed cell death (e.g., during tissue thawing and subsequent hyperperfusion). Neuromodulation using a cryotherapeutic treatment in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include cooling a structure proximate an inner surface of a body lumen wall such that tissue is effectively cooled to a depth where sympathetic renal nerves reside. For example, in some embodiments, a cooling assembly of a cryotherapeutic device can be cooled to the extent that it causes therapeutically-effective, cryogenic renal neuromodulation. In other embodiments, a cryotherapeutic treatment modality can include cooling that is not configured to cause neuromodulation. For example, the cooling can be at or above cryogenic temperatures and can be used to control neuromodulation via another treatment modality (e.g., to protect tissue from neuromodulating energy).


Renal neuromodulation can include an electrode-based or transducer-based treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Electrode-based or transducer-based treatment can include delivering electricity and/or another form of energy to tissue at a treatment location to stimulate and/or heat the tissue in a manner that modulates neural function. For example, sufficiently stimulating and/or heating at least a portion of a sympathetic renal nerve can slow or potentially block conduction of neural signals to produce a prolonged or permanent reduction in renal sympathetic activity. A variety of suitable types of energy can be used to stimulate and/or heat tissue at a treatment location. For example, neuromodulation in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can include delivering RF energy, pulsed energy, microwave energy, optical energy, focused ultrasound energy (e.g., high-intensity focused ultrasound energy), or another suitable type of energy alone or in combination. An electrode or transducer used to deliver this energy can be used alone or with other electrodes or transducers in a multi-electrode or multi-transducer array. Furthermore, the energy can be applied from within the body (e.g., within the vasculature or other body lumens in a catheter-based approach) and/or from outside the body (e.g., via an applicator positioned outside the body). Furthermore, energy can be used to reduce damage to non-targeted tissue when targeted tissue adjacent to the non-targeted tissue is subjected to neuromodulating cooling.


Neuromodulation using focused ultrasound energy (e.g., high-intensity focused ultrasound energy) can be beneficial relative to neuromodulation using other treatment modalities. Focused ultrasound is an example of a transducer-based treatment modality that can be delivered from outside the body. Focused ultrasound treatment can be performed in close association with imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance, computed tomography, fluoroscopy, ultrasound (e.g., intravascular or intraluminal), optical coherence tomography, or another suitable imaging modality). For example, imaging can be used to identify an anatomical position of a treatment location (e.g., as a set of coordinates relative to a reference point). The coordinates can then entered into a focused ultrasound device configured to change the power, angle, phase, or other suitable parameters to generate an ultrasound focal zone at the location corresponding to the coordinates. The focal zone can be small enough to localize therapeutically-effective heating at the treatment location while partially or fully avoiding potentially harmful disruption of nearby structures. To generate the focal zone, the ultrasound device can be configured to pass ultrasound energy through a lens, and/or the ultrasound energy can be generated by a curved transducer or by multiple transducers in a phased array (curved or straight).


Heating effects of electrode-based or transducer-based treatment can include ablation and/or non-ablative alteration or damage (e.g., via sustained heating and/or resistive heating). For example, a treatment procedure can include raising the temperature of target neural fibers to a target temperature above a first threshold to achieve non-ablative alteration, or above a second, higher threshold to achieve ablation. The target temperature can be higher than about body temperature (e.g., about 37° C.) but less than about 45° C. for non-ablative alteration, and the target temperature can be higher than about 45° C. for ablation. Heating tissue to a temperature between about body temperature and about 45° C. can induce non-ablative alteration, for example, via moderate heating of target neural fibers or of vascular or luminal structures that perfuse the target neural fibers. In cases where vascular structures are affected, the target neural fibers can be denied perfusion resulting in necrosis of the neural tissue. Heating tissue to a target temperature higher than about 45° C. (e.g., higher than about 60° C.) can induce ablation, for example, via substantial heating of target neural fibers or of vascular or luminal structures that perfuse the target fibers. In some patients, it can be desirable to heat tissue to temperatures that are sufficient to ablate the target neural fibers or the vascular or luminal structures, but that are less than about 90° C. (e.g., less than about 85° C., less than about 80° C., or less than about 75° C.).


Renal neuromodulation can include a chemical-based treatment modality alone or in combination with another treatment modality. Neuromodulation using chemical-based treatment can include delivering one or more chemicals (e.g., drugs or other agents) to tissue at a treatment location in a manner that modulates neural function. The chemical, for example, can be selected to affect the treatment location generally or to selectively affect some structures at the treatment location over other structures. The chemical, for example, can be guanethidine, ethanol, phenol, a neurotoxin, or another suitable agent selected to alter, damage, or disrupt nerves. A variety of suitable techniques can be used to deliver chemicals to tissue at a treatment location. For example, chemicals can be delivered via one or more needles originating outside the body or within the vasculature or other body lumens. In an intravascular example, a catheter can be used to intravascularly position a therapeutic element including a plurality of needles (e.g., micro-needles) that can be retracted or otherwise blocked prior to deployment. In other embodiments, a chemical can be introduced into tissue at a treatment location via simple diffusion through a body lumen wall, electrophoresis, or another suitable mechanism. Similar techniques can be used to introduce chemicals that are not configured to cause neuromodulation, but rather to facilitate neuromodulation via another treatment modality.


Returning to FIG. 1, in another embodiment the system 100 may comprise a stent delivery system. In this embodiment, stent delivery catheter 102 includes stent delivery element 112. In one embodiment, stent delivery element 112 includes a dilatation balloon with a balloon expandable stent disposed thereon. The stent delivery catheter 102 also includes handle 110 operably connected to shaft 108 via proximal end portion 108a. The shaft 108 can be configured to locate the stent delivery element 112 intravascularly at a treatment location within or otherwise proximate to a body lumen (e.g., coronary artery). The handle 110 is configured to aid in the delivery and deployment of the stent (not shown) to the treatment location. The stent delivery system 100 does not include the console 104 or cable 106.


The stent of stent delivery element 112 may be any balloon expandable stent as known to one of ordinary skill in the art. In one embodiment, for example, the stent is formed from a single wire forming a continuous sinusoid. The stent may include a coating disposed on the surface of the stent. The coating may include a polymer and/or a therapeutic agent. In one embodiment, the coating includes a Biolinx™ polymer blended with a limus drug. In another embodiment, the stent is a drug filled stent having a lumen filled with a therapeutic agent. In still another embodiment, element 112 does not include a stent disposed on the dilatation balloon.


CONCLUSION

This disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present technology to the precise forms disclosed herein. Although specific embodiments are disclosed herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible without deviating from the present technology, as those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will recognize. In some cases, well-known structures and functions have not been shown and/or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the present technology. Although steps of methods may be presented herein in a particular order, in alternative embodiments the steps may have another suitable order. Similarly, certain aspects of the present technology disclosed in the context of particular embodiments can be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Furthermore, while advantages associated with certain embodiments may have been disclosed in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments can also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages or other advantages disclosed herein to fall within the scope of the present technology. Accordingly, this disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown and/or described herein.


Throughout this disclosure, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in reference to a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Additionally, the terms “comprising” and the like are used throughout this disclosure to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature(s) and/or one or more additional types of features are not precluded. Directional terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “front,” “back,” “vertical,” and “horizontal,” may be used herein to express and clarify the relationship between various elements. It should be understood that such terms do not denote absolute orientation. Reference herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar formulations means that a particular feature, structure, operation, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the present technology. Thus, the appearances of such phrases or formulations herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, various particular features, structures, operations, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. A neuromodulation catheter, comprising: an elongate shaft including a tubular wall,a first hypotube segment concentrically disposed within the tubular wall, the first hypotube segment being made at least partially of a first shape-memory alloy having a first shape-memory transformation temperature range, anda second hypotube segment concentrically disposed within the tubular wall proximal to the first hypotube segment along a longitudinal axis of the shaft, the second hypotube segment being made at least partially of a second shape-memory alloy having a second shape-memory transformation temperature range lower than the first shape-memory transformation temperature range; anda neuromodulation element operably connected to the shaft via a distal end portion of the shaft.
  • 2. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein: the elongate shaft includes a third hypotube segment concentrically disposed within the tubular wall between the first and second hypotube segments along the longitudinal axis, the third hypotube segment being made at least partially of a third shape-memory alloy having a third shape-memory transformation temperature range;the first, second, and third shape-memory alloys are the same; andthe third shape-memory transformation temperature range gradually increases along the third segment from the second segment toward the first segment.
  • 3. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 2 wherein the first, second, and third shape-memory alloys are nitinol.
  • 4. A neuromodulation catheter, comprising: an elongate shaft including a first segment made at least partially of nitinol having a first shape-memory transformation temperature range, anda second segment made at least partially of nitinol having a second shape-memory transformation temperature range lower than the first shape-memory transformation temperature range, the second segment being proximal to the first segment along a longitudinal axis of the shaft; anda neuromodulation element operably connected to the shaft via a distal end portion of the shaft,wherein the first shape-memory transformation temperature range includes an Af temperature greater than body temperature; andthe second shape-memory transformation temperature range includes an Af temperature less than body temperature.
  • 5. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation element comprises one or more energy delivery elements.
  • 6. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for electrode-based treatment.
  • 7. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for heat-element-based treatment.
  • 8. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for transducer-based treatment.
  • 9. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for chemical-based treatment.
  • 10. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 9 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for drug infusion.
  • 11. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 9, further comprising a therapeutic element including a plurality of needles.
  • 12. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for intravascular delivery via a transradial approach.
  • 13. The neuromodulation catheter of claim 1 wherein the neuromodulation catheter is configured for intravascular delivery to a renal artery of a human patient.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the following applications: (a) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/717,067, filed Oct. 22, 2012;(b) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/793,144, filed Mar. 15, 2013; and(c) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/800,195, filed Mar. 15, 2013. The foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (209)
Number Name Date Kind
4602624 Naples et al. Jul 1986 A
4649936 Ungar et al. Mar 1987 A
4709698 Johnston et al. Dec 1987 A
4764504 Johnson et al. Aug 1988 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
4998923 Samson et al. Mar 1991 A
5300068 Rosar et al. Apr 1994 A
5322505 Krause et al. Jun 1994 A
5358514 Schulman et al. Oct 1994 A
5368591 Lennox et al. Nov 1994 A
5399164 Snoke et al. Mar 1995 A
5423744 Gencheff et al. Jun 1995 A
5425364 Imran Jun 1995 A
5437288 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5477856 Lundquist Dec 1995 A
5484400 Edwards et al. Jan 1996 A
5558643 Samson et al. Sep 1996 A
5571147 Sluijter et al. Nov 1996 A
5599319 Stevens Feb 1997 A
5599345 Edwards et al. Feb 1997 A
5626576 Janssen May 1997 A
5672174 Gough et al. Sep 1997 A
5685868 Lundquist Nov 1997 A
5688266 Edwards et al. Nov 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. et al. Jan 1998 A
5772590 Webster, Jr. Jun 1998 A
5865787 Shapland et al. Feb 1999 A
5871444 Ouchi Feb 1999 A
5891110 Larson et al. Apr 1999 A
5893885 Webster, Jr. Apr 1999 A
5916178 Noone et al. Jun 1999 A
5931830 Jacobsen et al. Aug 1999 A
5935102 Bowden et al. Aug 1999 A
5944710 Dev et al. Aug 1999 A
5954719 Chen et al. Sep 1999 A
5983141 Sluijter et al. Nov 1999 A
6004269 Crowley et al. Dec 1999 A
6009877 Edwards Jan 2000 A
6024730 Pagan Feb 2000 A
6048338 Larson et al. Apr 2000 A
6059769 Lunn et al. May 2000 A
6066134 Eggers et al. May 2000 A
6099524 Lipson et al. Aug 2000 A
6102890 Stivland et al. Aug 2000 A
6117101 Diederich et al. Sep 2000 A
6135999 Fanton et al. Oct 2000 A
6149620 Baker et al. Nov 2000 A
6161048 Sluijter et al. Dec 2000 A
6219577 Brown, III et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224592 Eggers et al. May 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246914 de la Rama et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251092 Qin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254588 Jones et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273876 Klima et al. Aug 2001 B1
6273886 Edwards et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283951 Flaherty et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292695 Webster, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314325 Fitz Nov 2001 B1
6322558 Taylor et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322559 Daulton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6387075 Stivland et al. May 2002 B1
6405732 Edwards et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413255 Stern Jul 2002 B1
6475209 Larson et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488679 Swanson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506189 Rittman, III et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514226 Levin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522926 Kieval et al. Feb 2003 B1
6562034 Edwards et al. May 2003 B2
6585718 Hayzelden et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611720 Hata et al. Aug 2003 B2
6616624 Kieval Sep 2003 B1
6622731 Daniel et al. Sep 2003 B2
6635054 Fjield et al. Oct 2003 B2
6656195 Peters et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669670 Muni et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685648 Flaherty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6716207 Farnholtz Apr 2004 B2
6736835 Pellegrino et al. May 2004 B2
6749560 Konstorum et al. Jun 2004 B1
6845267 Harrison et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850801 Kieval et al. Feb 2005 B2
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6893436 Woodard et al. May 2005 B2
6939346 Kannenberg et al. Sep 2005 B2
7058456 Pierce Jun 2006 B2
7115183 Larson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119183 Seed et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128718 Hojeibane et al. Oct 2006 B2
7149574 Yun et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162303 Levin et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171275 Hata et al. Jan 2007 B2
7221979 Zhou et al. May 2007 B2
7276062 McDaniel et al. Oct 2007 B2
7381200 Katoh et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390894 Weinshilboum et al. Jun 2008 B2
7402151 Rosenman et al. Jul 2008 B2
7520863 Grewe et al. Apr 2009 B2
7615067 Lee et al. Nov 2009 B2
7617005 Demarais et al. Nov 2009 B2
7637903 Lentz et al. Dec 2009 B2
7647115 Levin et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653438 Deem et al. Jan 2010 B2
7682319 Martin et al. Mar 2010 B2
7702397 Fredricks et al. Apr 2010 B2
7708704 Mitelberg et al. May 2010 B2
7717948 Demarais et al. May 2010 B2
7727187 Lentz Jun 2010 B2
7744586 Larson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7744856 DeFilippi et al. Jun 2010 B2
7771410 Venturelli Aug 2010 B2
7771421 Stewart et al. Aug 2010 B2
7778703 Gross et al. Aug 2010 B2
7780646 Farnholtz Aug 2010 B2
7815600 Al-Marashi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7815637 Ormsby et al. Oct 2010 B2
7833191 Flach et al. Nov 2010 B2
7914467 Layman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7947016 Lentz May 2011 B2
7989042 Obara et al. Aug 2011 B2
8043279 Hisamatsu et al. Oct 2011 B2
8131371 Demarais et al. Mar 2012 B2
8131372 Levin et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140170 Rezai et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145317 Demarais et al. Mar 2012 B2
8150518 Levin et al. Apr 2012 B2
8150519 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8150520 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8175711 Demarais et al. May 2012 B2
8376865 Forster et al. Feb 2013 B2
20020165532 Hill et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183682 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030050681 Pianca et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060858 Kieval et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030125790 Fastovsky et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030181897 Thomas et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199863 Swanson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216792 Levin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040010289 Biggs et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040215186 Cornelius et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050080400 Corcoran et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080409 Young et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050187579 Danek et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050228460 Levin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251094 Peterson Nov 2005 A1
20050253680 Mathews et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060004346 Begg Jan 2006 A1
20060064055 Pile-Spellman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064123 Bonnette et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060095029 Young et al. May 2006 A1
20060100618 Chan et al. May 2006 A1
20060100687 Fahey et al. May 2006 A1
20060206150 Demarais et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224112 Lentz Oct 2006 A1
20060271111 Demarais et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070005009 Larson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070049999 Esch et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070129720 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070213687 Barlow Sep 2007 A1
20070265687 Deem et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070287955 Layman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080077119 Snyder et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097397 Vrba Apr 2008 A1
20080147001 Al-Marashi et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080287918 Rosenman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080319418 Chong Dec 2008 A1
20080319513 Pu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090036948 Levin et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090125001 Anderson et al. May 2009 A1
20090157048 Sutermeister et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090312606 Dayton et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010526 Mitusina Jan 2010 A1
20100030217 Mitusina Feb 2010 A1
20100057037 Webler Mar 2010 A1
20100069882 Jennings et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100099952 Adams Apr 2010 A1
20100100073 Lentz et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100137860 Demarais et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137952 Demarais et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191112 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217184 Koblish et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100222851 Deem et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100222854 Demarais et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228112 Von Malmborg Sep 2010 A1
20100305682 Furst Dec 2010 A1
20100324482 Farnholtz Dec 2010 A1
20100331618 Galperin Dec 2010 A1
20100331776 Salahieh et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110034989 Al-Marashi et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054464 Werneth et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066105 Hart et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110245808 Voeller et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276034 Tomarelli et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110288392 De La Rama et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120101413 Beetel et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120123328 Williams May 2012 A1
20120130289 Demarais et al. May 2012 A1
20120130345 Levin et al. May 2012 A1
20120136350 Goshgarian et al. May 2012 A1
20120143293 Mauch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172837 Demarais et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120204387 Carlson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120232529 Buckley et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130006238 Ditter et al. Jan 2013 A1
20140114288 Beasley et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140135736 Hebert May 2014 A1
20140142509 Bonutti et al. May 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
0348136 Dec 1989 EP
0521595 Jan 1993 EP
0680355 Nov 1995 EP
0787019 Aug 1997 EP
0937481 Aug 1999 EP
0951244 Oct 1999 EP
1334743 Aug 2003 EP
1656963 May 2006 EP
1839697 Oct 2007 EP
1982741 Oct 2008 EP
2106821 Oct 2009 EP
2332607 Jun 2011 EP
2351593 Aug 2011 EP
2398540 Dec 2011 EP
WO-9525472 Sep 1995 WO
WO9703611 Feb 1997 WO
WO-9736548 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9900060 Jan 1999 WO
WO-9911313 Mar 1999 WO
WO-0122897 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0170114 Sep 2001 WO
WO-2005041748 May 2005 WO
WO-2005110528 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2006041881 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2007008954 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2009108997 Sep 2009 WO
WO-2009125575 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2014066432 May 2014 WO
WO-2014066439 May 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (137)
Entry
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140.
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 56, Jul. 1975, pp. 208-217.
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation on Proximal Water and Sodium Reabsorption,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, Apr. 1976, pp. 1104-1107.
Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., “Loin Pain Hemaluria Syndrome: Pain Control with RFA to the Splanchanic Plexus,” The Pain Clinc, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327.
Curtis, John J. et al., “Surgical Therapy for Persistent Hypertension After Renal Transplantation” Transplantation, 31:125-128 (1981).
Dibona, Gerald F. et al., “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, The American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197.
Dibona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney-Past, Present and Future,” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624.
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of Complete Renal Denervation and Selective Afferent Renal Denervation on the Hypertension Induced by Intrenal Norepinephrine Infusion in Conscious Rats”, Journal of Hypertension 1989, 7: 447-455.
Katholi, Richard E., “Renal Nerves in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Experimental Animals and Humans,” Am J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983, the American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14.
Krum, Henry et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: A Mulitcentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study,” Lancet 2009; 373:1275-81.
Krum, et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension.” New England Journal of Med, Aug. 2009, 361;9.
Luippold, Gerd et al., “Chronic Renal Denervation Prevents Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetic Rats”, Nephrol Dial Transplant, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 342-347.
Mahfoud et al. “Treatment strategies for resistant arterial hypertension” Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:725-731.
Osborn, et al., “Effect of Renal Nerve Stimulation on Renal Blood Flow Autoregulation and Antinatriuresis During Reductions in Renal Perfusion Pressure,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimentla Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981.
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering From Nephritis,” Feb. 27, 1935;443-458.
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension,” J. Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30.
Rocha-Singh, “Catheter-Based Sympathetic Renal Denervation,” Endovascular Today, Aug. 2009.
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implictions for an Old Concept,” Hypertension, 2009; 54:1195-1201.
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension,” N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): 932-934.
Smithwick, R.H. et al., “Splanchnicectomy for Essential Hypertension,” Journal Am Med Assn, 1953; 152:1501-1504.
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators; Krum H, Barman N, Schlaich M, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011 ;57(5):911-917.
Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, “Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): A Randomised Controlled Trial”; Lancet, Dec. 4, 2010, vol. 376, pp. 1903-1909.
United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages.
Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD-Related Pain”, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16:160.
Wagner, C.D. et al., “Very Low Frequency Oscillations in Arterial Blood Pressure After Autonomic Blockade in Conscious Dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039.
European Search Report for European Application No. 13159256, Date Mailed: Oct. 17, 2013, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/066248, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 28 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/066256, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 28 pages.
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765.
Avitall et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984.
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831.
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages).
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages).
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages.
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002).
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chronic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, 11 pages. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1802370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages.
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relief, Time, Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.come/time/printout/0,8816,2103278,00.html>.
Papademetriou, Vasilios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages.
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro Intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080.
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management, and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages.
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005.
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003).
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages.
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pages.
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968.
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,110, filed Aug. 29, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,209, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,233, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,243, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,253, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,255, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,292, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,327, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,335, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,336, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,356, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct—2011.php>.
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>.
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension.” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europcr-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>.
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life—Investor Relations, Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>.
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media—relations/library/2011/2011-10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>.
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-news/interventional-news---latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>.
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages.
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>.
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n. l.), 4 pages.
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million.” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics, Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages, <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>.
“The Edison AwardsIM” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>.
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages.
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages.
Asbell, Penny, “Conductive Keratoplasty for the Correction of Hyperopia.” Tr Am Ophth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages.
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages.
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages.
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997).
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages.
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global Symplicity registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=83002>.
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages.
Dibona, G.F. “Sympathetic nervous system and kidney in hypertension.” Nephrol and Hypertension, 11: 197-200 (2002).
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998).
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; Mailed on Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages.
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages.
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertension.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages.
Gertner, Jon, “Meet the Tech Duo That's Revitalizing the Medical Device Industry.” Fast Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 AM, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>.
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Renal Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997).
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol,174: 1592-1594 (2000).
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery ebolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001).
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994).
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages.
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Huang et al., “Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats.” Hypertension 32 (1998) pp. 249-254.
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honour for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>.
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>.
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531. 2:527-534 (2001).
Lee, S.J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J, 40:545-549 (1999).
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages.
Lustgarten, D.L.,et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999).
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Circulation, 2013, 25 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages.
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page.
Medtronic, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages.
Millard, F. C., et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-734, (1989).
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:II-17-II-21 (1992).
Ong, K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006).
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShotIM renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013, 4 pages.
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal denervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trial.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 5 pages.
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012: Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Daily, Oct. 26, 2012, 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=80880>.
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68.
Renal Denervation (RDN), Symplicity RDN System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rdn/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf.
Schauerte, P., et al. “Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.” Circulation, 102:2774-2780 (2000).
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages.
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages.
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH position paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Sievert, Horst, “Novelty Award EuroPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages.
Solis-Herruzo et al., “Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome,” J. Hepatol. 5 (1987), pp. 167-173.
Stella, A., et al., “Effects of reversible renal deneravation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4:181-188 (1986).
Stouffer, G. A. et al., Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages.
Swartz, J.F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87: 487-499 (1993).
Uchida, F., et al., “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998).
Verloop, W. L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Heart J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>.
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium rentention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996).
Wilcox, Josiah N., Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012, Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages.
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages.
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages.
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages.
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages.
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Healio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages.
Miller, Reed, “Finding a Future for Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials.” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence, Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014, 4 pages.
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN I First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572.
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450.
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt Is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140114287 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
61717067 Oct 2012 US
61793144 Mar 2013 US
61800195 Mar 2013 US