This application claims priority under 35 USC 119 from FR 0403497 filed Apr. 2, 2004, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the production of aluminum by fused bath electrolysis. In particular, it relates to cathode elements suitable for use in electrolytic cells intended for production of aluminum.
2. Description of Related Art
The cost of energy is an important concern when analyzing the operating costs of aluminum reduction plants. Consequently, a reduction in the specific energy consumption of electrolytic cells is very important for these plants. The specific consumption of a cell is equal to the energy consumed by the cell to produce one metric ton (tonne) of aluminum. It is expressed in kWh/t and, for a constant current efficiency, is directly proportional to the electrical voltage at the terminals of the electrolytic cell.
The electrical voltage of an electrolytic cell can be sub-divided into several voltage drops, namely (i) the anode voltage drop, (ii) the voltage drop in the bath, (iii) the electrochemical voltage, (iv) the cathode voltage drop and line losses. The cathode voltage drop depends on the electrical resistance of the cathode element that includes a cathode block made of a carbonaceous material and one or several metal connecting bars.
The materials from which the cathode blocks are made have changed over time such that the electrical resistance to current passing through the blocks has been getting lower and lower. As such, there are increased currents passing through the cells, while a constant cathode voltage drop is maintained.
In the 1970s, cathode blocks were made of anthracite (amorphous carbon). This material offered a fairly high electrical resistance. Faced with the needs of plants to increase their current intensity in order to increase their production, these blocks were progressively replaced with so-called “semi-graphite” blocks (containing between 30% and 50% of graphite) starting from the 1980s, then by so-called “graphite” blocks containing 100% graphite grains but whose binder between these grains remained amorphous. Since the graphite grains of these blocks have a low electrical resistance, the blocks present a lower electrical resistance to current passing through them and consequently, for constant intensity, the cathode voltage drop is reduced.
Finally, the most recent block types are so-called “graphitized” blocks. A high temperature graphitization heat treatment is carried out on these blocks, increasing the electrical conductivity of the block by graphitization of the carbon.
At the same time as these above improvements were being implemented to reduce the electrical resistance of materials, the current used in aluminum reduction plants was increased. This increase in current consequently increased the plant's production (for constant current efficiency, the number of tonnes of metal produced by a cell is proportional to the intensity of the current that passes through it). Since the cathode voltage drop Uc is equal to the product of the cathode resistance Rc and the intensity I of the current circulating in the cathode (Uc=Rc×I), the cathode voltage drops remained high, typically about 300 mV.
Furthermore, changes to the properties of cathode blocks have led to the emergence of new problems such as, for example, erosion of cathodes. For example, it has been observed that as the quantity of graphite contained in cathode blocks increases, a block becomes more sensitive to erosion problems at the head of the block. The current density is not distributed uniformly over the entire width of the pot, and there is a peak current density at each end of the block, on the surface of the cathode. This peak current density causes local erosion of the cathode, which is particularly marked when the block is rich in graphite. These very high erosion areas can limit the life of the pot, which is a major economic problem for an aluminum reduction plant.
It is known that the cathode voltage drop Uc can be reduced by using composite connection bars including a steel part and a part made of a metal with an electrical conductivity higher than steel, usually copper. Examples of patents include French patent application FR 1 161 632 (Pechiney), U.S. Pat. No. 2,846,388 (Pechiney), U.S. Pat. No. 3,551,319 (Kaiser) and international application WO 02/42525 (Servico).
It is also known from international applications WO 01/63014 (Comalco) and WO 01/27353 (Alcoa), that copper inserts can be used to improve the distribution of current along the cathode block. These documents teach to enclose a copper insert in the steel connection bar and to confine the insert inside the cell in order to reduce conduction of heat out of the cell.
However, these solutions are, first of all, expensive because copper is more expensive than steel and the copper quantities involved may be high. In the most frequently used technologies, the number of bars per electrolytic pot is usually between 50 and 100. Therefore the extra cost associated with the presence of copper components increases very quickly.
Furthermore, even the known revised configurations are not fully satisfactory. These configurations cause reductions in the global cathode voltage drop (in other words including the voltage drop in the bar) on the order of 50 mV, which is too low to justify the additional investment costs, and produce relatively high peak current densities at the head of the block, namely more than about 12 kA/m2.
Therefore the applicants tried to find satisfactory solutions to the drawbacks of prior art, and particularly to the problem of specific consumption.
The present invention therefore relates to a system that provides reduction in the cathode voltage drop to reduce the specific consumption of electrolytic cells.
In accordance with this and other objects, the present invention provides a cathode element suitable for use in a pot of an electrolytic cell capable of use in the production of aluminum, the cathode element comprising:
In a cathode element according to the instant invention, the connection bar preferably includes, for each external segment, at least one metal insert with a length Lc, whose electrical conductivity is greater than the electrical conductivity of steel, the metal insert is arranged longitudinally inside the bar and is at least partly located in the external segment; for each external segment the connection bar is advantageously not sealed to the cathode block in at least one zone called the “unsealed” zone having a surface area S and which is located at the end of the groove at the head of the block.
Preferably, the insert is flush (with a defined tolerance) with the surface of the end of the external segment.
Advantageously, the insert or each insert comprises copper or a copper based alloy.
The use of an insert according to the present invention can simultaneously result in (i) a very large drop in the global cathode voltage (for example 0.2 V for a bar with a copper insert compared with 0.3 V for an entirely steel bar) and (ii) a very strong reduction in the current density at the head of the block (generally at least on the order of 20%).
The invention also relates to an electrolytic cell comprising at least one cathode element according to the present invention.
Additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part, will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects, features and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instrumentalities and combination particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the appended figures.
It was discovered by the present applicants that a large part of the drop in the cathode voltage (about one third) is located in the part of the bar “outside the block” (i.e. that part that extends out of the block). In fact, the current density in the bar increases towards the part of the bar located outside the block and reaches a maximum value at the point the bar exits the block. Consequently, over the entire part of the bar located “outside the block”, a small section carries a large quantity of current, which causes a large voltage drop.
The applicants had the idea of combining an unsealed zone close to the head of the cathode block, and at least one insert in each external segment of the connection bar that extends preferably over substantially the entire length of the segment. They observed that, unexpectedly, the combined effect of these characteristics very significantly reduces the peak current density that exists at the head of the block, (in other words close to the ends of the block), while very significantly reducing the cathode voltage drop. In particular, it was discovered that the unsealed zone can significantly reduce the impact of the ridge base on the peak current density.
The present invention is particularly attractive when the carbonaceous material comprises graphite.
A suitable process for manufacturing a connection bar that could be used in a cathode element according to the present invention, advantageously includes the formation of a longitudinal cavity—typically a blind hole—in a steel bar starting from one end of the steel bar. It further includes manufacturing an insert comprising a material with a conductivity that is higher than the steel from which the bar is made, and having a length and a section corresponding to the length and section of the cavity, and then introducing the insert into the cavity.
Intimate contact between the insert and the bar is usually achieved as the pot temperature increases, due to the presence of a differential thermal expansion between the insert and the bar (since steel expands relatively little compared with other metals).
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The cathode blocks 5 and the connection bars 6 form cathode elements 20 that are usually assembled outside the pot and are added thereto during the formation of its inner lining. An electrolytic pot 10 typically comprises more than about 10 cathode elements 20 generally arranged side by side. A cathode element 20 may include one or several connection bars passing through the block from side to side, or one or several pairs of half-bars typically in line, that extend only on a part of the block.
A function of the connection bars 6 is to collect the current that passed through each cathode block 5 and to direct it to the conductor network located outside the pot. As illustrated on
During operation, the pot 10 contains a pad of liquid aluminum 8 and an electrolytic bath 9 above the cathode blocks 5, and the anodes 4 dip into the bath 9. A solidified bath ridge 12 usually forms on the side linings 3′. A part 12′ of this ridge 12, called the “ridge base” can project over the upper lateral surface 28 of the cathode block 5. The ridge base electrically isolates the cathode and increases the peak current density at the block head.
As illustrated in
The insert or each insert 16 is preferably housed in a cavity forming a blind hole inside the bar 6. This variant can avoid exposure of the insert to possible bath or liquid metal infiltrations. The cavity may comprise a groove on a side face of the bar, for example, as illustrated in
The insert preferably occupies at least about 90% of the length Le of the external segment or each external segment 19 of the connection bar 6 in which it is housed to optimize the reduction in the voltage drop obtained according to the present invention.
The end surface 24 which will be outside the pot 10 is usually substantially vertical when the cathode element 20 is installed in a pot.
According to one advantageous variant of the invention, the insert or each insert 16 is substantially flush, with a determined tolerance, with the surface 24 of the end of the external segment 19 of the bar 6. The said determined tolerance is preferably less than or equal to ±1 cm.
According to another advantageous variant of the invention, the external end of each insert 16 is set back by a determined distance from the surface 24 of the end of the external segment 19 of the bar 6. The said determined distance is preferably less than or equal to 4 cm. The cavity formed by setting back the insert may advantageously contain a refractory material to prevent heat loss by radiation and/or convection.
The length Lc of the insert 16 is typically from about 10 to about 300%, preferably from about 20 to about 300%, and more preferably from about 110 to about 270%, of the length E of the “part outside the block” 22 of the bar 6 that emerges from the cathode block 5 and in which the insert is housed.
The longer the insert, the lower the cathode voltage drop. However, the applicant noted that, when the insert is longer than about 270% of the part 22 of the bar outside the block, increasing of the insert length only has a small effect on the value of the cathode voltage drop.
As illustrated in
The total area A of the determined surface(s) S of the unsealed zone(s) 17 of each connection bar 6 is typically from about 0.5 to about 25%, and preferably from about 2 to about 20%, and more preferably from about 3 to about 15%, of the area Ao of the surface So of the bar 6 that may be sealed, called the “sealable zone”. The sealable surface So is the surface of the part 23 of the bar 6 that faces the internal surfaces of the groove 15 in the block 5.
When the connection bar or each connection bar 6 passes through the cathode block 5 from one side to the other as illustrated in
When the connection bars 6 are interrupted towards the center of the block to form two half-bars in line with each other, for example, as illustrated in
The determined surface S typically comprises a simple shape so as to facilitate formation of the unsealed zone 17. In the case illustrated in
The section of the insert 16 also affects the reduction of the cathode voltage drop. Advantageously, the cross section of each insert is from about 1 to about 50%, and preferably from about 5 to about 30%, of the cross section of the bar 6. For values of insert section greater than about 30% of the total section, the additional conducting quantity may in some cases significantly increase the cost without increasing performances very much.
The insert 16 is typically in the form of a bar. The cross section of the insert 16 can have any desired shape. For example, its shape can possibly be rectangular (as illustrated in
Digital calculations have been made to evaluate the distribution of the cathode current at the surface 28 of the cathode block obtained with configurations according to prior art and according to the present invention.
An exemplary cell for which the calculations were conducted comprises 20 cathode elements arranged side by side and each comprising two connection bars as illustrated in
Curve A, applicable to prior art, corresponds to an all-steel connection bar. The cathode voltage drop is 283 mV (between the center of the liquid metal pad and the anode frame of the downstream pot).
Curve B, applicable to prior art, applies to a steel bar with the same dimensions as in case A, but comprising a copper cylindrical insert with a length equal to 1.53 m and a diameter equal to 4.13 cm. The insert is placed along the longitudinal axis of symmetry of the bar and extends substantially from the center of the bar (in other words substantially from a central plane P of the pot) to about half the thickness of the lining of the side 3′ of the cell. The cathode voltage drop is 229 mV. The reduction in the cathode drop is about 19% less than in case A, and the reduction in the peak current density is about 18%.
Curve C relating to the present invention corresponds to a steel bar with the same dimensions as in case A, but with a copper cylindrical insert with length Lc equal to 1.30 m and with a diameter equal to 4.5 cm (corresponding to a copper volume identical to that in case B). The insert is placed along the longitudinal axis of symmetry of bar and, as in
Additional advantages, features and modifications will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, and representative devices, shown and described herein. Accordingly, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
As used herein and in the following claims, articles such as “the”, “a” and “an” can connote the singular or plural.
All documents referred to herein are specifically incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04 03497 | Apr 2004 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2593751 | Grolee | Apr 1952 | A |
2846388 | Morel | Aug 1958 | A |
3551319 | Elliott | Dec 1970 | A |
4110179 | Tschopp | Aug 1978 | A |
5976333 | Pate | Nov 1999 | A |
6294067 | Gauthier et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
20040050714 | Torvund | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20080135417 | Allano et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0938598 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1161632 | Dec 1956 | FR |
2179201 | Feb 2002 | RU |
2239007 | Oct 2004 | RU |
WO 0127353 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0163014 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0242525 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2004031452 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050218006 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |