Patent Grant
7368865
This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/EP2003/014909, filed 24 Dec. 2003, which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 02080585.9, filed on 30 Dec. 2002. The contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a picture display device comprising a display tube having an evacuated glass envelope, which envelope comprises, arranged along a longitudinal axis, a display panel having a short axis and a long axis, provided with a display screen on its inner side, a conical portion and a neck portion, the conical portion being connected to an upstanding wall of the display panel.
Picture display devices of the type described in the opening paragraph are used, inter alia, in television apparatuses and computer monitors and are referred to as cathode ray tubes (CRTs).
Picture display devices of the type described in the opening paragraph are known. Generally they have a (maximum) deflection angle of 110° and a total depth corresponding therewith. E.g. a 110° 32″ WSRF tube has a depth of 49.94 cm.
The future Cathodic Ray Tubes should have a reduced depth in order to remain competitive on the market. Going to what is called a slim tube is bringing many technical difficulties. When focusing on the glass components of the tube, it is observed that if the usual design rules are applied the stresses on the glass envelope due to the vacuum load are increasing when the depth is decreasing.
In other words: the shorter the tube, the higher the stresses induced.
A conventional way of reducing vacuum stresses is to increase the glass thickness, which is not cost effective however. CRT glass components should withstand a vacuum load but are also going through a thermal process when assembling the tube components. The thermal process realized induces thermal (temporary) stresses in the glass that can limit the processing time. The so-called thermal stresses are higher with thick glass. In other words: the thicker the glass, the slower the thermal processing of the tube.
One comes then to a fundamental problem: going to slim tubes means thicker glass design to withstand vacuum stress. Thicker glass design means slower processing time (when assembling the tube) involving a lower output of the factory and thus higher costs, and more expensive components.
The problem is thus to find a way to reduce the stress level of a (slim) tube without having to change the glass thickness.
It is an object of the invention to provide a picture display device in which said problem is alleviated.
To this end, the picture display device according to the invention is characterized in that the cross section of the conical portion in a plane through the longitudinal axis and the short axis of the panel has a first area (41) of the conical portion (4) adjacent to the upstanding wall (15) of the display panel (2) which transverses into a second area (42) of the conical portion adjacent to the position where its parabolic curvature ends (end of round), the Z and Y coordinates of the outer contour in said plane being defined suxh that at
0.5L=Z
0.88H<Y<H
wherein H is the seal edge position on the short axis (in mm), and L is the depth (in mm) of the conical portion along the longitudinal axis from the seal edge towards the end of round position.
The two main glass components of the envelope are:
The invention applies to one or both of these two components in order to reduce the stress on the most critical area of the tube: the seal edge (interface panel/cone) at the North/South positions.
The Cone Shape:
The cone shape can be simplified if we consider three longitudinal cross sections: North/South, East/West and diagonal. The invention applies to the section North/South (short axis cross section). It consists of making the cone contour (curvature) of this cross section more “bulgy” and is realized by defining the shape of the cone portion in the manner indicated above, whereby up to at least half the length L of the cone as herein before defined the cone body height sinks by maximally 12%. (The contour follows a substantially flat path in the panel sided cone part.)
The parameters that are specified are point coordinates where the outside contour of the short cross axis section should pass: Z and Y, which are depending on H and L (H and L are known values: H is the seal edge position on the North/South axis, and L is the depth of the cone from the seal edge to the so-called end of round area (common term in CRT technology).
Preferably: Z and Y should be such that at:
Z=0.5L,
H>Y≧0.9H
most preferably
H>Y≧0.95H
(In other words: the flatter the contour of the panel sided cone part, the better, preferably up to at least half the length L of the cone as herein before defined the cone body height sinks by maximally 10%, even more preferably by maximally 5%.)
Preferably the conical portion shows a transition point P between a flat portion and a steep portion, which transition point lies beyond 0.5L, preferably between 0.5L and 0.8L and for the Y value lies between 0.88H and H, preferably between 0.9H and H, most preferably between 0.95H and H.
The Panel MML Radius:
A parameter that is used during the design of a panel is the position and the contour of the Mould Match Line (MML). The invention specifies a certain value to be used for the radius of the Mould Match Line on the North/South positions.
This radius is MR1.
According to a further embodiment MR1 should preferably be such that
8500 mm≦MR1≦11000 mm
above MR1 values of 11000 mm the glass manufacturer may encounter problems in making the product.
In the drawings:
The Figures are purely diagrammatic and not to scale. For the sake of clarity, some dimensions have been greatly exaggerated. Similar components are denoted as much as possible by identical reference numerals in the Figures.
The cone ends at the position 45, which is also termed the neck seal position.
The display panel 2 presents a Mould Match Line (MML) 24 which at the North and South positions of the panel has a radius MR1.
H=216 mm; L=122.5 mm, and for Z=62.97 mm (slightly more than L/2) Y=202.33 mm (i.e. Y=0.937 H). At this transition point P the first more or less flat part 41 changes over into a steep part 42. A quite pronounced bend is visible.
In the table below some 32″ CRT models+calculations show the effect of the measures according to the invention.
In column I of the table data relating to a conventional 32″ CRT cone (not slim) are presented. In this case there is not such an inflexion point as in the inventive cone design. At Z/L=50%, Y/H is smaller than 90%, namely 84%.
In column II data relating to a 32″ CRT cone of a similar design, but having a “flatter” Mould Match Line (Radius MR1=9300 mm instead of 6200 mm) are presented. It can be seen that this measure helps to reduce the stresses to a certain extent. (E.g. the tangential stress at the seal edge is reduced by 5%). The thickness was not changed.
In column III data relating to a 32″ Slim CRT cone are presented. The data were obtained by scaling the dimensions of the reference tube (column I) to a slim tube, the thickness also being scaled. It can be seen that, compared with the reference tube of column I, the stresses substantially increase.
In column IV data relating to a 32″ Slim CRT cone of a similar design as that in column III, but now using the inventive rule on the cone shape, are presented. At the Z-position which complies with Z/L=50%, Y/H is 95% in this case, compared to 84% in the case of the tubes in columns I and II. In going from the column III design to the column IV design the thickness has not been reduced. It can be seen that the vacuum stresses at the critical locations are substantially reduced (compared with the data of column III).
Finally, in column V data relating to a 32″ Slim CRT cone of a similar design as that in column IV, but the thickness having been reduced, are presented. The thickness was reduced to an extent to produce stress levels comparable to those in column III. The weight of the cone goes down from 8.8 Kg to 8 Kg, but even important: the weight of the panel goes down from 25.3 Kg to 24.6 Kg. (The panel is twice as expensive as the cone).
So, the invention allows to reduce stresses (going from column III to column IV) involving significant increase of thermal processing speed, or to reduce the cone thickness without increasing the stress level (going from column III to column V), involving lower costs.
To check further the applicability of the invention, a study was realized on two tube types under development: 28″ WSRF (not slim) and 36″ WSRF slim. The invention was implemented in the original designs (which follow the conventional design rules) and the reduction of stress checked.
The 28″ WSRF tube is a Wide Screen (=9:16 panel aspect ratio) Real Flat tube having a nominal deflection angle of 110° (=not slim type).
H=186 mm; L=148 mm, with Y/H=0.86 at Z/L=0.50.
H=186 mm; L=148 mm, with Y/H=0.95 at Z/L=0.50. An bend is visible at transition point P.
Further, the radius MR1 of the Mould Match Line was changed from 4000 to 9000 mm.
Upon comparing the stress pictures of the original tube with the tube implemented with the invention (as regards MR1 and cone shape) a substantial reduction of high stress on the seal edge is observed. The reduction at the critical area (seal edge) is 28% lower stress. This means that also in a not slim (110° deflection angle type) tube the use of the invention has a substantial effect.
The 36″ WSRF tube is a Wide Screen Real Flat tube of the nominal 120° deflection angle type (=Slim type).
H=246.9 mm, L=136.0 mm, with Y/H=0.90 at Z/L=0.50.
H=241.9 mm, L=136.0 mm, with Y/H=0.95 at Z/L=0.50, a transition point P is visible, the coordinates of the transition point P are: Z=68.0 mm; Y=229.2 mm.
Further MR1 was changed from 7600 mm to 10800 mm. The benefits of the invention allow to reduce the stress and thus the thickness. By adapting the design thickness, the total glass weight could be reduced with 1.2 kg and the seat edge stress was still reduced by 5%.
It can clearly be seen that the contour R21 of the vertical section of the inventive cone (or: funnel) body has a pronounced “transition” point P, as compared with the contour R2 of the conventional cone body design which substantially follows a path (arc) having a fixed radius. The latter is more convenient for the tube manufacturer. When a conventional body using a fixed radius is used, the value Y at ½L can be roughly calculated to be H−0.52(H−Y value at end or round). Typically the Y value at end of round is approximately 0.4H, giving a value of H−0.25×0.6H=0.85H. In the table one can see that indeed for all reference cone a value very close to this estimate (for all cone Y=0.845H at Z=L/2). At half the length of the conical part the cone height for conventional designs sinks by 15%. The cone portion in cross-section is substantially arc-like.
In the inventive design the Y value at Z=L/2 is increased, giving a flatter first part 41 of the cone (the height sinks up to half of the cone length by not more than 12%, preferably not more than 10%, even more preferably not more than 5%), and consequently, since the height at end of round i.e. at L, remains the same, a more steeper second part 42. This gives the cone a more “box-like appearance” and a transition point P between the top (first part 41 for which part the radius of curvature is predominantly pointing downwards) and the side (second part 42 for which part the radius of curvature is predominantly pointing sideways) of the box is evident. At the transition point P the general direction of the radius of curvature changes drastically. The z-value, measured from the edge of the cone-portion, of the transition point P between the top and side of “the box” may lie at or very close to L/2, however, may also lie somewhat beyond L/2, preferably the transition point lies between 0.5L and 0.8L, preferably between 0.5L and 0.6L. The transition point P is the point where the flat upper portion changes over into the steeper side portion. The flatter the design is at the top (i.e. the less the height sinks at L/2) the more pronounced the box-like appearance and the transition point P becomes. Another word that could be used for the transition point P would be for instance the inflection point, from the adjective inflexed, meaning abruptly turned or bent inwards, see e.g Webster's comprehensive dictionary 1996 edition. In each of the designs shown in
The improvement in terms of stress reduction at the seal edge which is obtainable by the invention as defined in claim 1 can be enlarged somewhat by applying the inventive rule not only to the contour R2 of the short cross section, but also to the contour R3 for the long cross section.
The examples above relate to Wide Screen (16:9) tubes. However, the inventive rule can also be applied to 4:3 tubes if these should be made shallow. As the adaptation of the contour R2 of the short cross section in that case has a less strong effect, adaptation of both R2 and R3 contours can make “the difference”.
The design of a cone (or: funnel) body is an iterative process.
General Design Sequence
Depending on the result of phase 4, phase 1, 2 or 3 may have to be repeated. An average of about 10 iterations are needed before an optimal funnel body design is obtained.
Verticals Design
In
The design process for the funnel body starts with the definition of the three main sections on the outside. This description may e.g. be performed with:
Preferably the verticals are designed in the following sequence:
This is conventionally described using a single radius (single arc). In the preferred embodiments of the inventive design an inflexion point P is defined. The further design follows the definition of this point.
The construction method of a 3r contour for a given horizontal section is performed with reference to
Starting Points:
Rd=selected diagonal radius
L=distance from tube axis to point on long section;
S=distance from tube axis to point on short section;
D=distance from tube axis to point on diagonal section;
DA=diagonal angle;
CA=construction angle.
Summarizing, the invention relates to a display tube having an evacuated envelope which comprises a display panel, a cone (or: funnel) portion and a neck portion. The cone portion has a cone body portion and a parabolic portion. The contour of the cone body in a plane through the longitudinal axis of the tube and the short axis of the panel has an inflexion point, such that up to at least half the length of the cone body the cone height sinks by maximally 12%, preferably less than 10%, more preferably less than 5%. Hereby stresses at the sealing face between the panel and the cone portion are reduced. More in particular the Z and Y coordinates of the transition point are such that
0.5L=Z and 0.88H≦Y<H,
wherein H is the seal edge position on the short panel axis (in mm) and L is the depth (in mm) of the cone portion. Preferably an inflexion point P is present, where the outer contour shows a bend.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02080585 | Dec 2002 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP03/14909 | 12/24/2003 | WO | 00 | 11/21/2005 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2004/059688 | 7/15/2004 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020153823 | Knoche et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060152314 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |
