The present disclosure is generally related to composites for use as electrodes.
Conventional batteries comprise two opposing electrodes assembled in a 2D, coplanar configuration, separated by an electronically insulating layer that is infused with an ion-conducting liquid electrolyte. While providing for facile and inexpensive cell fabrication, the use of liquid electrolytes presents challenges in terms of safety and may limit performance in challenging operating environments. For example, the nonaqueous electrolytes used for state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries are toxic and flammable. In addition to contributing to safety concerns, electrolyte volatility restricts the temperature range over which batteries can be effectively operated. Such concerns have driven the development of a wide range of solid-state electrolytes over the past 40 years, with compositions that are broadly based on organic (polymeric) or inorganic (ceramic) components, or in some cases, organic-inorganic hybrids (Scrosati, J. Appl. Electrochem. 2, 231 (1972); Fergus, J. Power Sources 195, 4554 (2010)). Despite advancements in solid-state electrolytes, their principal drawback remains modest ionic conductivity that restrains power performance in the ultimate battery. The brittle nature of ceramic-type solid-state electrolytes may also limit their use in particular types of batteries, such as wound-cell configurations (Roberts et al., J. Mater. Chem. 21, 9876 (2011)).
Solid-state electrolytes will have their greatest impact when transitioning from the simple 2D cell designs that dominate conventional batteries to next-generation 3D designs in which the three critical battery components (anode, cathode, and separator/electrolyte) are reconstructed as interpenetrating networks (
Electrodeposition is a non-line-of-sight fabrication method that circumvents the aforementioned issue with regard to modifying complex 3D substrates, and under controlled growth conditions produces nano scale, conformal-to-the-surface, pinhole-free, electronically insulating polymer coatings (
Disclosed herein is a composite comprising: an electrically conductive substrate, and a coating on the substrate comprising a polymer derived from a vinyl-containing siloxane monomer.
Also disclosed herein is a method comprising: providing an electrically conductive substrate, and electropolymerizing a vinyl-containing siloxane monomer to form a coating on the substrate.
A more complete appreciation of the invention will be readily obtained by reference to the following Description of the Example Embodiments and the accompanying drawings.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present subject matter may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known methods and devices are omitted so as to not obscure the present disclosure with unnecessary detail.
Disclosed herein are ultrathin, electronically insulating polymer coatings directly generated on planar two-dimensional (2D) and macroscopically thick (e.g., at least 50 μm, 1 mm, or 10 mm) porous three-dimensional (3D) conductive substrates via electro-reductive electropolymerization of vinyl-containing siloxane monomers, such as 1,3,5-trivinyl-1,3,5-trimethylcyclotrisiloxane (see structure below). Under electrografting conditions, the polymer can deposit as a conformal nanoscale film (100 nm thick or less) that covalently bonds to the conductive substrate. Subsequent application of potentials more negative than the electrografting potential yields a micrometers-thick film. Enhancements in the functionality of the polymer coating are obtained through incorporation of cations into the polymer matrix, enabling it to function as both separator and solid-state electrolyte in electrical energy-storage devices.
Polymer formation via electro-oxidation may be incompatible with electrode architectures that serve as the negative electrode of some 3D batteries, because corrosion or over-oxidation of the conductive scaffold may occur. Accordingly, polymer deposition via electro-reduction of siloxane-based monomers with pendant vinyl groups are is herein. For example, siloxane-based polymer films were electrodeposited onto a variety of conductive substrates in contact with nonaqueous solutions of the commercially available monomer, 1,3,5-trivinyl-1,3,5-trimethylcyclotrisiloxane (V3D3). Related siloxane-based polymer electrolytes, prepared by more conventional synthetic methods, demonstrate such desirable attributes as low electronic conductivity, resistance to oxidation, and high dielectric strength, but must typically be modified to improve ionic conductivity (Rossi et al., Polym. Int. 58, 267 (2009)). In the present case, the ether groups intrinsic to the V3D3 monomer and other siloxane monomers promote Li+ solvation and transport in the resulting electrodeposited polymer, imparting sufficient ionic conductivity to function as a solid-state separator/electrolyte. This protocol was initially used with planar substrates (carbon films, Cu and Zn foils), but electropolymerization of V3D3 on more complex substrates, such as Cu mesh, carbon-coated silica fiber paper, and Zn sponges has also been demonstrated.
Electropolymerization is a scalable fabrication method for generating thin polymer coatings on complex conductive substrates. Extending electropolymerization protocols to monomers such as V3D3 yields polymer coatings with chemical structures that are related to already proven siloxane-based bulk polymer electrolytes, and which should exhibit similar advantages in terms of chemical and thermal stability. When produced at nanoscale thickness and incorporated into a 3D battery configuration, such polymer electrolytes can minimize the power limitations that normally arise from the modest ionic conductivity of conventional solid-state electrolytes. Electropolymerization in the presence of the electrolyte salt of interest (LiClO4 in this case) for the ultimate polymer electrolyte also eliminates additional steps (e.g., salt impregnation) that would be required to incorporate an electrolyte salt into the neutral polymer.
The composite is made by first providing an electrically conductive substrate. The substrate may range from a simple planar substrate to a porous 3D substrate that can accommodate an interpenetrating network of another material (
Optionally, the substrate may be treated or coated with a first material that is capable of cation insertion, such as lithiation. Such a material should not completely fill or obstruct a majority of the pores.
Next, one or more vinyl-containing siloxane monomers are electropolymerized to form a coating on the substrate. V3D3 is one suitable monomer. Other suitable monomers include, but are not limited to, bis(triethoxysilylethyl)vinylmethylsilane, 2-(divinylmethylsilyl)ethyltriethoxysilane, vinyltris(methylethylketoximino)silane, vinyltris(trimethylsiloxy)silane, vinyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltris(2-methoxyethoxy)silane, vinyltriisopropoxysilane, vinyltriisopropenoxysilane, methacryloxypropyltris(vinyldimethylsiloxy)silane, tetrakis(vinyldimethylsiloxy)silane, tris(vinyldimethylsiloxy)methylsilane, vinylmethylbis(trimethylsiloxy)silane, vinylmethyldiacetoxysilane, vinyltriacetoxysilane, and vinyltriethoxysilane. Such monomers have the chemical properties required to electropolymerize into a solid-state electrolyte, separator, and/or electron insulator.
The electropolymerization is done by submerging some or all of the substrate in the monomer and applying an appropriate voltage to initiate electropolymerization. At certain voltages, the polymer will be electrografted to the substrate, meaning that the polymer is bound to the substrate, rather than merely adsorbed to the substrate. The electropolymerization may be self-limiting, meaning that polymerization ceases at any location that reaches a thickness that prevents further electropolymerization due to the low electrical conductivity of the film hindering further initiation. The use of self-limiting electropolymerization may produce a coating having an average or maximum thickness of no more than 500, 200, 100, 50, or 20 nm, and/or which does not completely fill or obstruct a majority of the pores in the substrate. At more negative potentials, the low conductivity of the film may be overcome such that solution polymerization may occur, which may clog the pores in the substrate. Techniques such as atomic force microscopy may be used to evaluate the coating to determine whether the electropolymerization conditions produced the desired form of the coating, and the electropolymerization potential adjusted to produce the desired form if necessary.
The coated substrate may be used as the anode of a rechargeable lithium insertion battery or other type of battery. The pores may be filled with a material capable of lithiation that contacts the polymer coating, but not the conductive substrate. When used as a battery, electrical connections are formed between the electrodes, including the substrate and or cation-insertion materials and an electrical load. Electricity is then allowed to flow through the electrical connections and the electrical load. The polymer may be infiltrated with lithium or other ions, or the ions may be present during the electropolymerization.
The following examples are given to illustrate specific applications. These specific examples are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure in this application.
Substrates—
Planar 2D carbon substrates (Lytle et al., ECS J. Solid-State Sci. Technol. 2, M3078 (2013)) and zinc sponges (US Patent Appl. Pub. No. 2014/0147757) were prepared as described in the literature. Copper foil and mesh were procured from commercial vendors, degreased in acetone, and subsequently cleaned in 1 M HNO3, rinsed with water, and dried at 160° C. in air prior to use. Zinc foil was procured from a commercial vendor and was degreased in acetone prior to use.
Electrochemically Initiated Polymerization—
Deposition was performed in a three-electrode electrochemical cell with a Ag wire reference electrode and a Pt counter electrode, placed inside a dry box saturated with N2 gas. Substrates were exposed to solutions containing 0.1 M 1,3,5-trivinyl-1,3,5-trimethyl-cyclotrisiloxane monomer in 0.1 M electrolyte salt (tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) or LiClO4) in acetonitrile. Polymerization can be initiated via a number of electrochemical techniques including voltammetric, potentiostatic, galvanostatic, and potential- or current-pulsed methods. Ultrathin films (<20 nm) were deposited when the electrode was poised at or near the “grafting” region (
Characterization of Morphology—
The morphology and thickness of the poly(V3D3) film on planar substrates was examined by atomic force microscopy. Electropolymerization produced films that conformally coated the irregular surfaces of the carbon substrate and were homogeneous in composition (
Electrical Characterization—
Solid-state DC and AC electrical properties of the poly(V3D3) film were assessed at room temperature in an argon-filled glovebox with a potentiostat/galvanostat. Electrical contact to the poly(V3D3) film was made with liquid gallium-indium eutectic or liquid mercury contacted to copper wire in a 1-mL plastic syringe (
Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the claimed subject matter may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Any reference to claim elements in the singular, e.g., using the articles “a”, “an”, “the”, or “said” is not construed as limiting the element to the singular.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/896,680, filed on Oct. 29, 2013. The provisional application and all other publications and patent documents referred to throughout this nonprovisional application are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3918989 | Gillman | Nov 1975 | A |
5100532 | Roling | Mar 1992 | A |
7144658 | Long et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7255924 | Long et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
8795885 | Prieto et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20050003271 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050079420 | Cho et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20100320972 | Tessier | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110027648 | Rolison | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110104470 | Anderson | May 2011 | A1 |
20130157129 | Uemura et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130196235 | Prieto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140162135 | Prieto et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173889 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174954 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20130101459 | Sep 2013 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Sassin, Megan B. et al. ‘Non-Line-of-Sight Deposition of Nanoscale Separator/Electrolytes for 3D All-Solid-State Batteries’ ECS Meeting Abstracts, May 15, 2013 (in file, povided by Applicant). |
O'Shaughnessy et al, Langmuir (2006), 22(16), 7021-7026, CAS Abstract. |
O'Shaughnessy et al. Langmuir 2006, 22, 7021-7026. |
Achyuta et al., “Incorporation of Linear Spacer Molecules in Vapor-Deposited Silicone Polymer Thin Films” Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1970-1978 |
Aresta et al., “Evidence of the filling of nano-porosity in SiO2-like layers by an initiated-CVD monomer” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 151 (2012) 434-439. |
Bélanger et al., “Electrografting: a powerful method for surface modification” Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3995-4048. |
Burkey et al., “Structure and mechanical properties of thin films deposited from 1,3,5-trimethy1-1,3,5-trivinylcyclotrisiloxane and water” J. Appl. Phys. 93 5143-5150 (2003). |
El-Enany et al., “In situ growth of polymer electrolytes on lithium ion electrode surfaces” Electrochemistry Communications 11 (2009) 2320-2323. |
Gabriel et al., “Cathodic electrografting of acrylics: From fundamentals to functional coatings” Progress in Polymer Science 35 (2010) 113-140. |
Gerbaldi et al., “All-solid-state lithium-based polymer cells for high-temperature applications” Ionics (2010) 16:177-786. |
Hart et al., “3-D Microbatteries” Electrochemistry Communications 5 (2003) 120-123. |
Hooper et al., “A Highly Conductive Solid-State Polymer Electrolyte Based on a Double-Comb Polysiloxane Polymer with Oligo(ethylene oxide) Side Chains” Organometallics, vol. 18, No. 17, (1999) 3249-3251. |
Hou et al., “Electropolymerization of Sulfonated Phenol by Cyclic Voltammetry” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. (2013) 1151-1156. |
Leroux et al., “Nanostructured Monolayers on Carbon Substrates Prepared by Electrografting of Protected Aryldiazonium Salts” Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 489-495. |
Liang et al., “Solid Polymer Electrolytes X: Preparation and Characterizations of Polyether-Siloxane, Organic-Inorganic, Hybrid Nanocomposites Complexed with Lithium Perchlorate” Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 42, 1928-1937 (2004). |
Long et al., “Three-Dimensional Battery Architectures” Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4463-4492. |
Long et al., “Architectural Design, Interior Decoration, and Three-Dimensional Plumbing en Route to Multifunctional Nanoarchitectures” Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 854-862. |
Lytle et al., “Carbon Ductwork with NanometricWalls and Micron-to-Submicron Inner Diameters” ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2 (10) M3078-M3083 (2013). |
O'Shaughnessy et al., “Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition of Trivinyltrimethylcyclotrisiloxane for Biomaterial Coatings” Langmuir 2006, 22, 7021-7026. |
Palacin et al., “Molecule-to-Metal Bonds: Electrografting Polymers on Conducting Surfaces” ChemPhysChem 2004, 5, 1468-1481. |
Rhodes et al., “Nanoscale Polymer Electrolytes: Ultrathin Electrodeposited Poly(Phenylene Oxide) with Solid-State Ionic Conductivity” J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13079-13087. |
Rhodes et al., “Charge insertion into hybrid nanoarchitectures: mesoporous manganese oxide coated with ultrathin poly(phenylene oxide)” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 350 (2004) 73-79. |
Rhodes et al., “Direct Electrodeposition of Nanoscale Solid Polymer Electrolytes via Electropolymerization of Sulfonated Phenols” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 8(11) A579-A584 (2005). |
Rhodes et al., “Architectural integration of the components necessary for electrical energy storage on the nanoscale and in 3D” Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 1731. |
Rolison et al., “Multifunctional 3D nanoarchitectures for energy storage and conversion” Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 226-252. |
Ruzmetov et al., “Electrolyte Stability Determines Scaling Limits for Solid-State 3D Li Ion Batteries” Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 505-511. |
Tan et al., “Poly(ether amine) and cross-linked poly(propylene oxide) diacrylate thin-film polymer electrolyte for 3D-microbatteries” Electrochemistry Communications 12 (2010) 1498-1500. |
Tan et al., “3-D microbattery electrolyte by self-assembly of oligomers” Solid State Ionics 198 (2011) 26-31. |
Tanguy, “On the electropolymerization of methacrylonitrile and acrylonitrile as studied by CV, EQCM and EIS” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 487 (2000) 120-132. |
Valvo et al., “Electrochemical elaboration of electrodes and electrolytes for 3D structured batteries” J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 9281. |
Voccia et al., “Electrografting of thin polymer films: Three strategies for the tailoring of functional adherent coatings” Progress in Organic Coatings 55 (2006) 175-181. |
Wang et al., “The Investigation of Electrochemical Properties and Ionic Motion of Functionalized Copolymer Electrolytes Based on Polysiloxane” ECS Transactions, 16 (35) 91-104 (2009). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/715,943, filed Oct. 19, 2012. |
Sassin et al. “Non-line-of-sight deposition of nanoscale separator/electrolytes for 3D all-solid-state batteries” ECS Meeting Abstracts, vol. MA2013-01, No. 534 (May 15, 2013). |
Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US14/62854 (dated Feb 4, 2015). |
Seach Report in EP14858852.8 (dated Feb. 24, 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150118552 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61896680 | Oct 2013 | US |