Cationic Polymers Containing 2-Hydrocyethyl-Methacrylic As Promoters For Asa Sizing

Abstract
The invention relates to polymers useful as a papermaking additives, The invention also relates to methods for making and using such additives.
Description
EXAMPLES
Example 1 (Comparative)

A low molecular weight 90/10 mole % acrylamide/[2-(methyl-acryloyloxy ) ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride copolymer (AMD/Q6) was prepared by a free radical co-polymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 45.62 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 10.45 parts of 75% Q6 solution, 2.4 parts of 2% sodium hypophosphite solution, and 53.93 parts of deionized water. The pH of the monomer solution was adjusted from 4.14 to 3.78 with a 20% solution of malic acid. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour before addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by addition of 278.46 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.63 to 3.76 with 0.57 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour.


The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.38 parts of ammonium persulfate into 7.87 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour just prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel 5 was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction.


The pH of the final product was equal to 3.1, bulk viscosity was equal to 90 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.) and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 12 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.). Molecular weight of this polymer (Mw) is equal to 227,000 daltons.


Example 2

A low molecular weight 90/10/5 mole % acrylamide/[2-(methylacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride/2-hydroxyethy methacrylate (AMD/Q6/HEMA) terpolymer was prepared by a free radical co-polymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 41.64 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 10.11 parts of 75% Q6 solution, 2.44 parts of 97% HEMA solution, 2.4 parts of 2% sodium hypophosphite solution, and 55.86 parts of deionized water. The pH of this solution was equal to 3.82. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour before addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by mixing 278.27 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.47 to 3.63 with 0.76 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour just prior to use. The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.38 parts of ammonium persulfate into 7.87 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction.


The pH of final product was equal to 3.1, bulk viscosity was equal to 70 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.) and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 11 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.). Molecular weight of this polymer (Mw) is equal to 257,000 daltons.


Example 3


Evaluation of polymers from Example 1 and 2 was done by preparation of ASA emulsions with these polymers, characterization of the emulsion particle size distribution (Table 1), addition of these emulsions to the paper slurry, forming paper handsheets and measuring handsheets sizing (Table 2).


Emulsification of ASA Using Polymers


Alkenyl succinic anhydride (ASA) emulsions were prepared with polymers from example 1 and 2 at a 1/0.1 ASA/polymer ratio. Concentration of ASA during the emulsification was equal to 3.85 wt. %. ASA emulsions were prepared by following procedure:

    • Solution of each polymer was prepared at 0.4-wt. % concentration on real basis using DI water.
    • 96.15 g of a polymer solution was placed in a small stainless steel blender jar, and the blender was started at a low speed.
    • While mixing, 3.85 g of ASA was added to a polymer solution by the means of plastic syringe. The speed of blender was immediately changed from low to high and the timer was started.
    • The emulsification was carried out for 3 min at a high speed.
    • The emulsion particle size was measured using Particle Size Analyzer Horiba LA 700.
    • A solution of 0.25 wt. % ASA concentration was prepared using deionized water adjusted with dilute hydrochloric acid to pH 3.
    • The emulsion was placed in ice water and immediately used for handsheet preparation.


Handsheet Preparation Process

Handsheets were prepared using a furnish of a 50/50 mixture of bleached hardwood and softwood kraft pulp refined to a Canadian Standard Freeness of 500 to which 15% by weight of precipitated calcium carbonate was added, and pH was adjusted to 7.8.


Deionized water was used for furnish preparation, and additional 80 ppm of sodium sulfate and 50 ppm of calcium chloride were added.

While mixing, a batch of 0.71% solids containing 10 g of cellulose fibers and calcium carbonate was treated with an ASA emulsion. After 60-sec contact time, an anionic retention aid was added and mixing continued for 15 sec. Three 2.8-g sheets of paper were formed using Standard (8″×8″) Nobel & Woods handsheet mold, to target basis weight of 50 Ib/Tappi Ream ,pressed between felts in the nip of a pneumatic roll press at about 15 psi and dried on the rotary dryer at 240° F. The dose of 3 lb/T of ASA and 1 lb/T of an anionic retention aid were applied.


Evaluation of Paper Sizing


The sizing of handsheets was tested using Bayer Ink Penetration test (BIP).


The BIP size testing method provides a fully automated application of ink to the under surface of the paper together with automatic measurement of the optical end point. This method uses the same principle as the TAPPI T 530 test but uses an instrument of our design, which provides an automated design and different geometry for light sources and detector. In particular, all steps of the BIP test were performed automatically with this apparatus. On the push of a start button, ink was pumped into a well until the ink contacted the under surface of the paper, determined electronically, and the timing of the ink penetration was obtained from a reflectance measurement and was displayed digitally. Neutral ink buffered to pH 7. 0 was used in all BIP testing and was prepared by dissolving 12. 5 g of naphthol green B dye in 500 mL of deionized water, and a pH 7 buffer solution was then added to bring the total volume to1000 mL at 23° C.


Handsheets were evaluated by the BIP test after a conditioning period of at least one day at 72 F and 50% relative humidity. Three handsheet specimens were tested, with two repetitions on each felt side, for a total of six tests.


To begin a BIP test, each paper specimen was inserted into the apparatus. A fiber optic source cable provided uniform illumination of the topside of the specimen.


A detector fiber optic cable viewed the same area of illumination. The initial reflectance of the specimen was determined automatically and stored for reference. The test ink was automatically metered by a metering pump from a reservoir into the bottom of a cone-shaped ink well until the ink contacted the underside of the paper specimen under test, at which time a timer was started electronically. The change in reflectance was periodically monitored automatically and the timer was stopped when a pre-specified percentage decrease in reflectance was reached. This decrease was about 20%, i. e., the specimen retained about 80% of its initial reflectance. The elapsed time of the test was displayed and recorded to the nearest second. Then a drain pump was started automatically and run for a period of time long enough to empty the ink in the well into a waste reservoir. The average test time for the three specimens on the felt side were calculated.









TABLE 1







ASA Emulsion Particle Size Distribution















Percent of
Size Under





Median
Particles
Which



ASA/
Particle
Under 1
Are 90% of
Particle Size


Polymer
Polymer
Size
micron
Particles
Distribution


ID
Ratio
(microns)
(%)
(micron)
Graph





Example 1
1/0.1
0.631
72.6
1.771
Normal with







shoulder


Example 2
1/0.1
0.490
95.8
0.835
Normal
















TABLE 2







Sizing Efficiency of ASA Emulsion












ASA/Polymer
Sizing (sec)


Polymer ID
Polymer Description
Ratio
3 lb/T ASA





Example 1
Low MW Copolymer
1/0.1
146


Example 2
Low MW Terpolymer
1/0.1
290









In Table 1 it is shown that ASA emulsion prepared with a polymer from Example 2 has smaller median particle size and narrower particle size distribution. In Table 2 it is shown that ASA emulsion prepared with polymer from Example 2 provides higher sizing than ASA emulsion prepared with a polymer from Example 1.


Example 4

A low molecular weight 90/10/5/4 mole % acrylamide/[2-(methylacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride/2-hydroxyethy methacrylate/acrylic acid (AMD/Q6/HEMA/AA) tetrapolymer was prepared by a free radical co-polymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 99.13 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 25.28 parts of 75% Q6 solution, 6.11 parts of 97% HEMA solution, 2.66 parts of 99% acrylic acid solution, 5.0 parts of 4% sodium hypophosphite solution, and 10.32 parts of deionized water. The pH of this solution was equal to 2.12. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour before addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by mixing 242.7 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.69 to 4.53 with 0.28 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour prior to use. The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.96 parts of ammonium persulfate into 7.28 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction.


The pH of final product was equal to 2.03, bulk viscosity was equal to 2310 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.) and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 7.0 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.). Molecular weight of this polymer (Mw) is equal to 212,000 daltons.


Example 5

ASA emulsions were prepared with polymers from Examples 1, 2 and 4 at a 1/0.2 ASA/polymer ratio. Concentration of ASA during the emulsification was equal to 3.85 wt. %. ASA emulsions were prepared by the procedure described in Example 3 except that 0.8% polymer solution was used for emulsification. Handsheets were made and tested as it was described in Example 3.









TABLE 3







ASA Emulsion Particle Size Distribution















Percent of
Size Under





Median
Particles
Which Are



ASA/
Particle
Under 1
90% of
Particle Size


Polymer
Polymer
Size
micron
Particles
Distribution


ID
Ratio
(microns)
(%)
(micron)
Graph





Example 1
1/0.2
0.589
73.0
2.062
Normal with


(compara-




shoulder


tive)


Example 2
1/0.2
0.509
86.0
1.210
Normal


Example 4
1/0.2
0.550
81.2
1.032
Normal
















TABLE 4







Sizing Efficiency of ASA Emulsion (Example 1, 2 and 3)












ASA/Polymer
Sizing (sec)


Polymer ID
Polymer Description
Ratio
3 lb/T ASA





Example 1
Low MW Copolymer
1/0.2
440


(comparative)


Example 2
Low MW Terpolymer
1/0.2
560


Example 4
Low MW Tetrapolymer
1/0.2
495









In Table 3 it is shown that ASA emulsions prepared with a polymer from Example 2 and 4 have smaller median particle size and narrower particle size distribution than ASA emulsion prepared with a polymer from Example 1. Table 4 shows that ASA emulsified with polymers from Example 2 and 4 provides higher sizing than ASA emulsified with a polymer from Example 1.


Example 6

ASA emulsion is prepared with a polymer from Example 4 at an ASA/polymer ratio of 1/0.2 and 1/1. These emulsions were compared to ASA emulsions prepared with conventional cationic starch at ASA/starch ratios of 1/0.2 and 1/1.


Emulsions were prepared as described in Example 3, except that a 0.8 wt. % polymer or starch solution was used to make an emulsion at 1/0.2 ASA/emulsifier ratio, and a 4 wt % solution of polymer or starch was used to make an emulsion at 1/1 ASA/emulsifier ratio. Stability of emulsions was checked after 2 hrs.


Handsheets were made and tested as it was described in Example 3.









TABLE 5







ASA Emulsion Particle Size Distribution
















Percent of







Median
Particles
Size Under Which
Particle Size
Emulsion



ASA/Polymer
Particle Size
Under 1 micron
Are 90% of Particles
Distribution
After


Polymer ID
Ratio
(microns)
(%)
(micron)
Graph
2 hr
















Example 4
1/0.2
0.599
81.2
1.363
Normal
No change


Example 4
1/1  
0.55
89.5
1.032
Normal
No change


Starch
1/0.2
10.498
15.6
19.170
Bimodal
Separated


Starch
1/1  
0.614
84.7
1.143
Normal
Agglomerated
















TABLE 6







Sizing Efficiency of ASA Emulsion (Example 3 and Starch)












ASA/Polymer
Sizing (sec)



Polymer ID
Ratio
3 lb/T ASA















Example 4
1/0.2
495



Example 4
1/1  
733



Starch
1/0.2
0



Starch
1/1  
1005










At a 1/0.2 ASA/polymer ratio, ASA emulsion prepared with polymer from Example 4 has small median particle, narrow particle size distribution and is stable for at least two hours. This emulsion provides sizing of paper.


At the ratio of 1/0.2 ASA/starch, ASA emulsion has large median particle size, bimodal distribution and separates within 30 min. This emulsion doesn't provide sizing.


At the ratio of 1/1 of ASA/polymer and ASA/starch, ASA emulsions prepared with polymer and with starch have small median particle size and narrow particle size distribution, however ASA/starch emulsion is not useable after 2 hour, while ASA/polymer emulsion is not changed for at least two hours.


At 1/1 ratio, ASA emulsion prepared with starch outperforms emulsion prepared with polymer.


Example 7 (Comparative)

A high molecular weight 90/10 mole % acrylamide/ [2-(methylacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride copolymer (AMD/Q6) was prepared by a free radical co-polymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 45.62 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 10.45 parts of 75% Q6 solution, and 56.30 parts of deionized water. The pH of the monomer solution was adjusted from 4.1 to 3.7 with 0.08 parts of 20% solution of malic acid. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour prior to addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by mixing 278.41 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.8 to 3.8 with 0.62 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour prior to addition.


The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.22 parts of ammonium persulfate into 8.03 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction.


The pH of final product was equal to 3.05, bulk viscosity was equal to 2389 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.) and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 62 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.). Molecular weight of this polymer (Mw) is equal to 1,000,000 daltons.


Example 8

A high molecular weight 90/10/5 mole % acrylamide/ [2-(methylacryloyloxy) ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride/2-hydroxyethy methacrylate (AMD/Q6/HEMA) terpolymer was prepared by a free radical copolymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 41.64 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 10.11 parts of 75% Q6 solution, 2.44 parts of 97% HEMA solution, and 58.26 parts of deionized water. The pH of this solution was equal to 3.62. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour before addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by mixing 278.30 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.87 to 3.81 with 0.73 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour prior to use.


The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.26 parts of ammonium persulfate into 7.99 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction.


The pH of final product was equal to 3.16, bulk viscosity was equal to 1400 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 lo spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.) and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 50 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.). Molecular weight of this polymer (Mw) is equal. to 1,050,000 daltons.


Example 9

ASA emulsions were prepared with polymers from Examples 7 and 8 at a 1/0.1 ASA/polymer ratio. Concentration of ASA during the emulsification was equal to 3.85 wt. %. ASA emulsions were prepared, and handsheets were made and tested as it was described in Example 3.









TABLE 7







ASA Emulsion Particle Size Distribution













Median
Percent of
Size Under



ASA/
Particle
Particles Under
Which Are 90%



Polymer
Size
1 micron
of Particles


Polymer ID
Ratio
(microns)
(%)
(micron)





Example 7
1/0.1
1.192
43.4
2.913


(comparative)


Example 8
1/0.1
0.773
59.8
2.412
















TABLE 8







Sizing Efficiency of ASA Emulsion












ASA/Polymer
Sizing (sec)


Polymer ID
Polymer Description
Ratio
3 lb/T ASA





Example 7
High MW Copolymer
1/0.1
131


(comparative)


Example 8
High MW Terpolymer
1/0.1
332









In Table 7 it is shown that an ASA emulsion prepared with the polymer from Example 8 has smaller median particle size than an emulsion prepared with the polymer from


Example 7. As it is shown in Table 8, sizing obtained with ASA emulsified Example 8 is significantly higher than sizing obtained with ASA emulsified with Example 7.


Example 10

A high molecular weight 90/10/5 mole % acrylamide/[2-(methylacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride/2,3-dihydroxypropyl methacrylate (AMD/Q6/DHPMA) terpolymer was prepared by a free radical co-polymerization. The polymerization process was carried out by simultaneous, continuous addition of ammonium persulfate and monomer solutions to a reaction vessel that contained deionized water and chelating agent buffered with malic acid. The monomer solution was prepared by mixing 40.93 parts of 52.96% acrylamide solution, 9.93 parts of 75% Q6 solution, 2.87 parts of 100% DHPMA, and 58.66 parts of deionized water. The pH of this solution was adjusted from 4.9 to 4.05 with 0.6 parts of 20 % malic acid solution. The monomer solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour before addition. The reactor vessel solution was prepared by mixing 278.65 parts of deionized water and 0.27 parts of 40% pentasodium diethylenepentaacetate. The pH of the reactor vessel solution was adjusted from 10.15 to 3.80 with 0.38 parts of 20% malic acid solution. The latter solution was sparged with nitrogen for an hour prior to addition.


The initiator solution was prepared by addition of 0.26 parts of ammonium persulfate into 7.99 parts of deionized water. This solution was sparged with nitrogen for half an hour prior to use. The addition of monomer solution and ammonium persulfate solution to the reactor vessel was carried out over 2.25 hr and 2.5 hr, respectively. The polymerization reaction was performed at 65° C. The reaction solution was maintained under the nitrogen purge throughout the course of reaction. The pH of final product was equal to 3.16, bulk viscosity was equal to 920 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 3 spindle, 12 rpm, at 25° C.), and viscosity of a 2% polymer solution was equal to 39 cP (measured using Brookfield viscometer model DV-III, # 2 spindle, 30 rpm, at 25° C.).


Example 11

ASA emulsions were prepared with polymers from Examples 7, 8 and 10 at a 1/0.1 ASA/polymer ratio. Concentration of ASA during the emulsification was equal to 7.4 wt. %. ASA emulsions were prepared as it was described in Example 3, except that 7.4 grams of ASA was added to 92.6 g of a 0.8 wt % polymer solution. Handsheets were made and tested as it was described in Example 3.









TABLE 9







ASA Emulsion Particle Size Distribution
















Percent of
Size Under




ASA
Median
Particles
Which Are



ASA/
Concen-
Particle
Under 1
90% of



Polymer
tration
Size
micron
Particles


Polymer ID
Ratio
(%)
(microns)
(%)
(micron)















Example 7
1/0.1
7.4
0.909
55
2.153


(comparative)


Example 8
1/0.1
7.4
0.702
66.5
1.990


Example 10
1/0.1
7.4
0.714
65.7
1.942
















TABLE 10







Sizing Efficiency of ASA Emulsion (Examples 4 and 5)












ASA/Polymer
Sizing (sec)


Polymer ID
Polymer Description
Ratio
3 lb/T ASA





Example 7
High MW Copolymer
1/0.1
206


(comparative)


Example 8
High MW Terpolymer
1/0.1
349


Example 10
High MW Terpolymer
1/0.1
327









In Table 9 it is shown that ASA emulsions prepared with polymers from Example 8 and 10 have smaller median particle size than the emulsion prepared with the polymer from Example 7. As it is shown in Table 10, sizing obtained with ASA emulsified with polymers from Examples 8 and 10 is significantly higher than sizing obtained with ASA emulsified with the polymer from Example 7.


Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other variations are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the versions contained therein.

Claims
  • 1. A cationic polymer useful as a papermaking additive, which is obtained by copolymerizing (1) a vinyl monomer selected from the group consisting of the formula (I), formula (Ia), and combinations thereof, wherein formula (I) and formula (Ia) are as follows: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+RsRSR3X−  (I)(CH2═CHCH2)2N+(R2)2X−  (Ia)wherein R1 is a hydrogen atom or a methyl group, A is an oxygen atom or NH group, n is 2 or 3, R2 and R3 are each a methyl group or an ethyl group and X is a chlorine atom, a bromine atom, or X− is a methyl sulfate ion; and(2) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR4—CONH2   (II)wherein R4 is a hydrogen atom or a methyl group; and(3) a vinyl monomer selected from the group consisting of formula (III), (IIIa), and combinations thereof, wherein formula (III) and (IIIa) are as follows: CH2═CR5COO(CH2)nOH   (III)CH2═CR6COO(CH2)mCHOHCH2OH   (III)wherein R5 and R6 is a hydrogen atom or a methyl group, n is 1-4, inclusive and m is 1 or2.
  • 2. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer has a cationic charge of at least 1 to 99 mole %.
  • 3. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer comprises units derived from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in an amount ranging from 1 to 30 mole percent.
  • 4. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer has an average molecular weight ranging from 10,000 to 3,000,000 daltons.
  • 5. The polymer of claim 1, wherein the polymer is crosslinked or branched.
  • 6. An amphoteric polymer useful as a papermaking additive, which is obtained by copolymerizing (1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 7. Polymer of Claim 6, wherein the polymer has an anionic charge ranging from 0-40 mole percent.
  • 8. A method comprising (a) providing paper stock;(b) adding to the paper stock a composition comprising: (i) synthetic sizing agent, and(ii) a polymer including a cationic polymer useful as a paper additive, which is obtained by copolymerizing(1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 9. The method of Claim 8, wherein the polymer a cationic charge of at least 1 to 99 mole %.
  • 10. The method of Claim 8, wherein the polymer comprises 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in an amount ranging from 1 to 30 mole percent.
  • 11. The method of Claim 8, wherein the weight ratio of synthetic sizing agent:polymer is added in an amount ranging from 1:0.05 to 1:1.
  • 12. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is emulsified.
  • 13. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is selected from the group consisting of alkenyl succinic anhydride, alkyl ketene dimer, alkeno ketene dimers, alkyl isocyanates, alkyl anhydrides, and combinations thereof.
  • 14. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is added in conjunction with the cationic polymer.
  • 15. The method of Claim 8, wherein the temperature is ranges from 20 C to 40 C.
  • 16. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is added as an emulsion containing polymers or an emulsion containing polymers and starch.
  • 17. The method of Claim 8, wherein the sizing efficiency: resistance of water to paper is increased, as determined by the ink penetration test or the Cobb test
  • 18. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent added as a sizing emulsion containing surfactant and the emulsion is prepared under low shear conditions.
  • 19. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is added as a sizing emulsion containing surfactant and the emulsion is prepared under high shear conditions.
  • 20. The method of Claim 8, wherein the sizing efficiency improvement ranges from 10 to 200 percent more, as compared to when the paper is prepared without the polymer.
  • 21. Paper made from the method of Claim 8, wherein the paper has a ink penetration ranging from 50 to 1500 seconds.
  • 22. Paper made from the method of Claim 8, wherein the paper has a cobb value ranging from 15 to 200 grams/m2.
  • 23. The method of Claim 8, wherein the synthetic sizing agent is applied at a dosage ranging from 0.1 kg/metric ton to 10 kg/metric
  • 24. A method comprising: (a) providing paper stock;(b) adding to the paper stock a composition comprising: (i) a synthethic sizing agent, and(ii) an amphoteric polymer useful as a paper additive, which is obtained by copolymerizing(1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 25. A method for making a cationic polymer useful as a paper additive wherein the method comprises copolymerizing(1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 26. A method for malting an amphoteric polymer useful as a paper additive, wherein the method comprises copolymerizing (1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 27. A method comprising (a) providing paper stock;(b) forming a web from said paper stock,(c) adding to the web a composition comprising: (i) alkenyl succinic anhydride, and(ii) a cationic polymer useful as a paper additive which is obtained be copolymerizing(1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN+R2R2R3X−(I)
  • 28. A method comprising: (a) providing paper stock;(b) forming a web from said paper stock,(c) adding to the web a composition comprising: (i) alkenyl succinic anhydride, and(ii) an amphoteric polymer useful as a paper additive, which is obtained by copolymerizing(1) a vinyl monomer of the formula: CH2═CR1—COA(CH2)nN30 R2R2R3X−  (I)
  • 29. The process of Claim 28, wherein the paper is further treated with polymers selected from the group consisting of anionic polymers, nonionic polymers, and combinations thereof.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US05/13334 4/19/2005 WO 00 6/17/2007
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60580556 Jun 2004 US