Causticization method

Abstract

A causticization method including the steps of calcining limestone in the presence of additive means for producing lime of increased lime efficiency relative to the lime that would result from calcining such limestone without the presence of the additive means, lime efficiency being determined on a sodium carbonate solution for which conditions, other than the character of the lime, are fixed, and subsequently feeding the lime of increased lime efficiency into the sodium carbonate solution for producing sodium hydroxide and calcium carbonate from the sodium carbonate.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a causticization method wherein sodium carbonate solution is reacted with lime for producing sodium hydroxide and calcium carbonate.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the invention is to provide new and improved process for causticizing sodium carbonate solution.

This as well as other objects which will become apparent from the description that follows are achieved according to the present invention by providing a causticization method including the steps of calcining limestone in the presence of additive means for producing lime of increased lime efficiency relative to the lime that would result from calcining such limestone without the presence of the additive means, the lime efficiency being determined on a sodium carbonate solution for which conditions, other than the character of the lime, are fixed, and subsequently feeding the lime of increased lime efficiency into the sodium carbonate solution for producing sodium hydroxide and calcium carbonate from the sodium carbonate.

"Lime efficiency" is the proportion of lime charged which forms calcium carbonate.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the Bayer Process for the production of alumina from bauxite, large tonnages of quicklime (calcium oxide) or slaked lime (calcium hydroxide) are used for causticization of the Bayer liquors in order to regenerate caustic (NaOH) from Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3.

Causticization can proceed by either of two over-all reactions, which differ in the chemical form of lime which reacts:

(1) CaO(s)+Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 (aq)+H.sub.2 O=2NaOH(aq)+CaCO.sub.3 (s) (2) Ca(OH).sub.2 (s)+Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 (aq)=NaOH(aq)+CaCO.sub.3 (s) Reaction (1) corresponds to the charging of dry lime, i.e. quicklime, while Reaction (2) is for the charging of lime which has been previously slaked, i.e. "pre-slaked" lime.

The present invention permits increasing the lime efficiency of a given lime by the addition of small amounts of alkali metal compound such as alkali metal salts, preferably in solution or slurry form, to the limestone (CaCO.sub.3), prior to calcination to produce quicklime. Preferably, the alkali metal compound results in some liquid, i.e. molten, material being present on the limestone during calcination, the liquid being present in an amount effective for promoting the yield of lime of increased lime efficiency. The invention will be described using Bayer liquor (sodium aluminate solution) as a convenient source of dissolved alkali metal salt, but other alkali metal salts can be used as well, such as Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3, NaCl, and Na.sub.2 C.sub.2 O.sub.4.

The Bayer liquor is added to the limestone at a rate sufficient to add Na.sub.2 O equivalent to 0.1 to 2.0 weight percent of the limestone weight. During pre-heating of the limestone prior to calcination, the salt solution is evaporated, leaving a residue of salts on the limestone. To effect calcination, the limestone is heated to bring about the change of CaCO.sub.3 to CaO, with evolution of CO.sub.2.

Tests of lime efficiency in causticization indicate that e.g. sodium compound addition in the limestone calcination step can improve the causticization behavior significantly. The improvement is measured by changes in the lime efficiency in causticization. As indicated above, lime efficiency is defined as the proportion of the total CaO charged for causticization which forms CaCO.sub.3 rather than other reaction products such as Ca(OH).sub.2 or calcium aluminates.

Typical results of the tests using three different limestones are shown in Table I, where the limestones used were as follows: 410316B--Kimmswick Formation, Love Hollow Quarry, Batesville, Ark., coarse to very coarse-grained (i.e. 500 to 3,000 microns crystal diameter) limestone, 99% CaCO.sub.3 ; 410147--Unnamed quarry near Cabo Rojo, Dominican Republic, very fine-grained (i.e. 1/2 to 5 microns crystal diameter) limestone, 97% CaCO.sub.3 ; 410311C--Edwards Formation, Texas Crushed Stone Co. Quarry, Williamson County, Tex., medium-grained (i.e. 25 to 1,000 microns crystal diameter) limestone, 97% CaCO.sub.3. The Na.sub.2 O addition of Table I was added in the form of Bayer liquor, based upon proportion of contained Na.sub.2 O, and in order to give an example of how this is calculated, the 0.35% value was achieved as follows: Using Bayer liquor containing sodium at a level equivalent to 175 grams per liter (g/l), ##EQU1## In practice, the concentration of the liquor should be adjusted by dilution with water or more dilute liquor so that the ratio of liquor added to limestone is at least 0.25 liters/g limestone, to ensure that the alkali salts are well distributed in the limestone. The dilution calculation is as follows for the example above of 0.35% Na.sub.2 O addition: ##EQU2## Therefore, for this example, 10 ml of liquor (175 g Na.sub.2 O/l) should be diluted with water to 125 ml to add 0.35% Na.sub.2 O to the limestone, and to ensure complete wetting of the limestone for proper distribution of the alkali salts. The quicklime surface area is BET surface area determined on a Micromeritics Surface Area Analyzer. The slaking time of Table I was determined according to ASTM Standard Method C110-76a, Physical Testing of Quicklime, Hydrated Lime, and Limestone, Vol. 13, pages 69-86, Section 10. Calcination of the limestone was for two hours at 1,000.degree. C.

TABLE I______________________________________Effect on Lime Efficiency of Additionof Sodium to Limestone Prior to Calcination LimeNa.sub.2 O Quicklime Slaking Efficiency (%) Addition Surface Area Time Pre- DryLimestone (%) (m.sup.2 /g) (min) Slaked Charged______________________________________410316B 0 2.0 1.5 54 44 0.35 0.5 24 64 65410147 0 3.1 3.5 40 38 0.30 0.7 21 55 65410311C 0 2.8 2.5 -- 42 0.73 0.7 30 -- 73______________________________________

Additional experimental conditions used in the tests of Table I are listed in Tables IIA and IIB, TC and TA being defined, respectively, as follows: TC is the total caustic (NaOH) content of the liquor, expressed as equivalent grams Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 per liter of solution; TA is the total alkali (Na.sub.2 O) content, also expressed as equivalent grams of Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 per liter of solution. Thus, TA includes both Na.sub.2 O in caustic and Na.sub.2 O in Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 in the liquors.

TABLE IIA______________________________________Experimental Conditions Used to Obtain thePre-Slaked Lime for Charging in theLime Efficiency Determinations of Table I______________________________________Slaking Liquor TA = 24 g/l TC = 16 g/l Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 = 5 g/lQuicklime Charge 125 g/l solidsQuicklime Size -100 mesh (Tyler)Temperature 90.degree. C.Reaction Time 15 minutes______________________________________ TABLE IIB______________________________________Experimental Conditions Used in Causticizationto Determine the Lime Efficiency of Table I______________________________________Liquor TA = 120 g/l TC = 84 g/l Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 = 42 g/lInitial TC/TA 0.7Target TC/TA 0.8Initial Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 /TC 0.5Lime Charge 33% of stoichio- metric per Reaction (1) for "Dry Charged" and Reaction (2) for "Pre-Slaked"Reaction Temperature 90.degree. C.Reaction Time 30 minutes______________________________________

The data of Table I show that lime efficiency can be increased by as much as 75% by appropriate addition of sodium salts to the limestone prior to calcination. It also shows that lime efficiency may be followed indirectly by measuring quicklime surface area or slaking rate. It is, however, prudent to be on guard for changes in the surface area empirical relationship to lime efficiency, or the slaking rate empirical relationship to the same, since the empirical relationships can change. The proportion of alkali metal compound or salts required to increase the lime efficiency of the product lime differs for each limestone, and must be determined empirically. The data in Table I show that lime efficiency can be increased for both methods of lime addition in causticizing--addition either as dry lime, i.e. quicklime, or as pre-slaked lime.

The result of this improvement in lime efficiency is a reduction in the tonnage of lime required to achieve a given degree of causticization or, conversely, increased causticization of the liquor without increasing the tonnage of lime used. A secondary benefit of decreasing the lime charging rate for causticization is a reduction in the tonnage of alumina lost due to formation of insoluble calcium-aluminates, since the amount of calcium aluminate formed during causticization is approximately proportional to the amount of lime charged.

Claims

1. The causticization method comprising the steps of calcining limestone in the presence of additive means for producing lime of increased lime efficiency relative to the lime that would result from calcining said limestone without the presence of said additive means, said additive means comprising an alkali metal compound, said lime efficiency being determined on a sodium carbonate solution for which conditions, other than the character of the lime, are fixed, and subsequently feeding the lime of increased lime efficiency into said sodium carbonate solution for producing sodium hydroxide and calcium carbonate from the sodium carbonate.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, said alkali metal compound comprising a sodium compound.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, the lime being added dry to the sodium carbonate solution.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1, the lime being added pre-slaked to the sodium carbonate solution.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, molten material being present in the step of calcining in an amount effective for promoting the yield of said lime of increased lime efficiency.