The present invention relates to underwater projectiles having a supercavitating running mode.
Research and development is currently underway to produce underwater projectiles that travel at very high speeds using the phenomenon of “supercavitation.” A progenitor of such projectiles is the “Shkval,” which is a rocket-propelled torpedo that was developed by Russia and achieves a velocity of 250 knots (288 mph).
A supercavitating projectile's main features are a specially shaped nose and a streamlined, hydrodynamic, and aerodynamic body. The nose has a blunt leading surface that is referred to as a “cavitator.” When the projectile travels through water at speeds in excess of about one hundred miles per hour, the cavitator deflects water outward so fast that the water flow separates and detaches from the surface of the projectile. Since water pressure takes time to collapse the wall of the resulting cavity, the nose opens an extended bubble of water vapor.
Given sufficient speed, the cavity can extend to envelop the entire projectile except the nose. Once engulfed by the bubble, the drag experienced by the projectile is significantly reduced. As a consequence, a projectile moving in the cavity (“cavity-running”) can travel at far greater speeds for a given amount of thrust than a projectile that is moving in a conventional manner through water. A cavity-running projectile quite literally “flies” through the surrounding gas. In the absence of sustaining propulsion, the projectile loses supercavitation and eventually stalls due to drag. A secondary benefit of cavity running is that the motion stability of the projectile is enhanced.
The present invention provides a way to increase the distance over which a projectile is capable of sustaining a cavity-running mode.
There is an “optimum” value for the nose-to-body ratio of a projectile when operating underwater in a cavity-running mode. This optimum value is a function, primarily, of the prevailing pressure (i.e., depth and water density) and velocity. Therefore, as long as the projectile maintains a horizontal trajectory and constant speed, the optimum value for this ratio does not change. Once the projectile deviates from a horizontal path, the optimal value will, of course, change.
It has been recognized by the inventor that it would be advantageous to be able to actively and dynamically adjust the nose-to-body ratio to maintain an optimum value. Doing so maximizes the distance for which the projectile remains in the cavity-running mode. And that maximizes the speed of the projectile and distance that it can ultimately travel.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, a projectile having a cavity-running mode is provided with velocity and/or depth/pressure sensors and a means for changing the diameter of its nose. Based on changes in conditions, as measured by the sensors, the diameter of the nose can be actively reduced or increased, as required, to maintain a diameter that best satisfies the optimum value for the nose-to-body diameter ratio.
In some embodiments, the forward-most portion of the nose is configured as a plurality of nested, right-circular cylindrical shells or segments. By withdrawing or adding segments in the manner of the movement of a “spy-glass” or telescoping antennae, the diameter of nose (i.e., cavitator) is changed.
The means for changing nose diameter can be suitably implemented as a MEMS device configured as an actuator and coupled to a drive train, wherein the drive train couples to the various segments of the forward portion of the nose. In conjunction with the present disclosure, those skilled in the art will be able to design and build such a mechanism.
In some other embodiments, a simplified (i.e., less “intelligent”) version of an actuator, such as a series of spring latches, can be used to adjust the diameter of the nose by sequentially releasing segments of the nose, etc.
Forward face 108 of nose 102 is blunt so that when projectile 100 achieves suitable velocity, a cavity-running mode of operation is created. In particular, the blunt face 108 pushes aside water as it advances. When the hydrodynamic pressure of water that is pushed aside overcomes the ambient static pressure, the water vaporizes. The vaporized water forms air bubbles, which coalesce to form a “cavity” in the water. If enough bubbles are formed, the cavity will be large enough to completely engulf the projectile (with the exception of the blunt tip of the nose). Since the projectile is then surrounded by air, rather than water, hydrodynamic drag is substantially reduced.
For the foregoing reason, forward face 108 and/or segment 104 is therefore referred to as a “cavitator.” For the purposes of this specification, including the appended claims, reference to “the diameter of the nose” means the diameter of cavitator 104.
As depicted in
To permit nesting, each segment 106-i has a diameter that is different than every other segment 106-i. In the illustrative embodiment, the nesting segments are cylindrical; however, in other embodiments, they are right-circular conical segments. Note that in the illustrative embodiment, forward face 108 is a substantially flat, substantially continuous surface. As such, and as will become clearer in conjunction with
As depicted in
Thus, in the state that is depicted in
As previously noted, forward surface 108 of cavitator 104 is substantially continuous. One way to accomplish this is depicted in
All other segments are configured in the manner of segments 106-2 and 106-3 to enable nesting and to provide a “solid” or continuous forward face 108 to cavitator 104, regardless of how many segments 106-i define the cavitator.
Returning to
The nose-to-body diameter ratio can be “optimized” on a variety of different bases. For example, it can be optimized based on providing the maximum range. Or it can be optimized based on minimizing the amount of thrust required to maintain supercavitation operation (i.e., the cavity-running mode). Those skilled in the art will recognize that additional bases for optimization exist.
For example, in some embodiments, processor 112 calculates an optimal nose diameter (i.e., cavitator diameter) using the expression:
Dn*=Db/([0.550783×Vo]+0.157122) [1]
Since body diameter Db is fixed and known, and the velocity is obtained from sensor 114, a new nose diameter is readily calculated.
Processor 218 determines which one or more segments 106-i should be moved to achieve the new “optimal” nose-to-body diameter ratio. Signals indicative of which segment(s) to move and by how much are generated by processor 218 and transmitted to a driver (not depicted). The driver generates signals appropriate for controlling actuator 216 to extend or withdraw drive line 214, as appropriate.
It will be appreciated that a variety of “nose” configurations can be adopted for any specified nose diameter. In particular, the nose diameter is determined by the diameter of cavitator 104. But that does not dictate the extent to segments 106-i that are not part of the cavitator 104 must be retracted. For example,
The extent to which the remaining segments are retracted will be dependent upon aerodynamic considerations, among other factors, and is within the competency of those skilled in the art.
Alternate expressions are available for determining optimal nose diameter. For example, for a cavity-running projectile that is under thrust, F, the optimal nose diameter (the diameter that sustains a cavity-running mode for the available thrust and the operating depth) is given by:
DN*=0.29×(F/(ρwatergH+ATM)0.5, [2]
wherein:
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
This case claims priority of the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Ser. No. 60/911,419 filed on Apr. 12, 2007, Ser. No. 60/992,025 filed on Dec. 3, 2007, and Ser. No. 61/033,418 filed on Mar. 3, 2008. All of these Provisional Patent Applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1371207 | Wilkinson | Mar 1921 | A |
3041992 | Lee | Jul 1962 | A |
3256816 | Pilcher, II | Jun 1966 | A |
3282216 | Calfee et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3677179 | Potteiger et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3842741 | Brothers et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4687455 | Sculatti | Aug 1987 | A |
4770369 | Flock et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5464172 | Jensen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5494239 | Giacomel | Feb 1996 | A |
6388184 | Glenning | May 2002 | B1 |
6739266 | Castano et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7779759 | Paulic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60911419 | Apr 2007 | US |