This disclosure relates to antibacterial compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam.
The pharmaceutical antibiotic composition comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam in a 2:1 weight ratio of ceftolozane active to tazobactam acid (“CXA-201”) displays potent antibacterial activity, including antibiotic activity against infections caused by many Gram-negative pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia). In particular, CXA-201 is a pharmaceutical composition being developed for intravenous administration for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and/or complicated urinary tract infections, and is being evaluated for treatment of pneumonia.
Ceftolozane is a cephalosporin antibacterial agent, also referred to as CXA-101, FR264205, or by chemical names such as (6R,7R)-3-[(5-amino-4-{[(2-aminoethyl)carbamoyl]amino}-1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-2-ium-2-yl)methyl]-7-({(2Z)-2-(5-amino-1,2,4-thiadiazol-3-yl)-2-[(1-carboxy-1-methylethoxy)imino]acetyl}amino)-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylate, and 7β-[(Z)-2-(5-amino-1,2,4-thiadiazol-3-yl)-2-(1-carboxy-1-methylethoxyimino)acetamido]-3-{3-amino-4-[3-(2-aminoethyl)ureido]-2-methyl-1-pyrazolio}methyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylate. The antibacterial activity of ceftolozane is believed to result from its interaction with penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) to inhibit the biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall which acts to stop bacterial replication. Ceftolozane sulfate is a pharmaceutically acceptable ceftolozane salt of formula (I) that can be formulated for intravenous administration or infusion.
In CXA-201, ceftolozane is combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor (“BLI”) tazobactam. Tazobactam is a BLI against Class A and some Class C β-lactamases, with well-established in vitro and in vivo efficacy in combination with active β-lactam antibiotics. Tazobactam can be combined with ceftolozane as a lyophilized composition obtained by lyophilizing a solution of water, a sodium containing base (e.g., sodium bicarbonate) and the tazobactam acid form of formula (II).
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising one or more drug substances can be prepared by lyophilization of a solution containing the drug substance(s). Lyophilization is a process of freeze-drying in which water is sublimed from a frozen solution of one or more solutes. Specific methods of lyophilization are described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chapter 84, page 1565, Eighteenth Edition, A. R. Gennaro, (Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1990). The formulation of pharmaceutical compositions can be selected to minimize decomposition of the constituent drug substances and to produce a composition that is stable under a variety of storage conditions.
As disclosed herein, compositions formed by lyophilizing ceftolozane and tazobactam demonstrated an increase in total ceftolozane related substance impurities over time of about 31-36% after 3 months at 25 degrees C. (e.g., see data tables in
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be manufactured to reduce the total amount and/or the rate of formation of certain related substances present in the pharmaceutical compositions over time by first combining the ceftolozane and tazobactam within a unit dosage form container (e.g., a vial, bag or other container) in powder form for later reconstitution (“split-fill” presentation), or by providing ceftolozane and tazobactam in separate containers for combination in a fixed dose ratio at a point of patient treatment (“two-container” presentation). In both presentations, the point of first contact of a ceftolozane-containing composition with a tazobactam-containing composition is closer in time to subsequent patient administration than in the products manufactured by processes that combine ceftolozane and tazobactam in a single (e.g., blended) composition prior to filling of the composition(s) into a unit dosage form container. As a result, the time available for formation of ceftolozane related substance impurities within the product is reduced in the products disclosed herein.
The unit dosage form containers can be obtained by a “split-fill” process comprising the steps of: (a) sequential, aseptic filling of the ceftolozane and tazobactam into a unit dosage form container; (b) blanketing the unit dosage form container with an inert gas; and (c) sealing the unit dosage form container.
Alternatively, a product presentation comprising separate unit dosage form containers can be obtained by a “two-container” process comprising the steps of: (a) aseptic filling and sealing of a ceftolozane composition in a first unit dosage form into a first container in the absence of tazobactam; (b) aseptic filling and sealing of a tazobactam composition in a first unit dosage form into a second container in the absence of ceftolozane; and (c) packaging the first container and the second container as a single product for later combination in a fixed dose combination of the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the amount of ceftolozane active and tazobactam free acid. The two-container product presentation can also be obtained by a process comprising the steps of: (a) providing a ceftolozane composition prepared in the absence of tazobactam, (b) providing a tazobactam composition prepared in the absence of ceftolozane, (c) aseptic filling and sealing of the ceftolozane composition in a first unit dosage form into a first container; (d) aseptic filling and sealing of the tazobactam composition in a second unit dosage form into a second container in the absence of ceftolozane; and (c) packaging the first container and the second container as a single product for later combination in a fixed dose combination of the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the amount of ceftolozane active and tazobactam free acid.
Measurements of ceftolozane related substances can be identified as compositions having the retention times for peaks 1-11 in Table 1, as identified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), where HPLC measurements are made using a Develosil column ODS-UG-5; 5 micrometers; 250×4.6 mm, a mobile phase of sodium perchlorate buffer solution (pH 2.5)/CH3CN 90:10 (v/v) at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate and oven temperature of 45° C. (i.e., as used herein, “related substances”).
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane (e.g., ceftolozane sulfate) and tazobactam (e.g., tazobactam sodium) can be obtained by processes that reduce the total amount of related substances after the compositions are placed in a unit dosage form container and prior to opening these containers for administration of the product to a patient. The products can be manufactured by methods that avoid contact of ceftolozane and tazobactam prior to placement in a unit dosage form container or prior to formulation of a fixed dose ceftolozane-tazobactam combination product from multiple product containers.
Preferably, products disclosed herein provide less time for formation of ceftolozane Related Substances within the unit dosage form container than alternative product presentations where ceftolozane and tazobactam are brought into contact prior to placement in one or more unit dosage form containers. As used herein, the term “related substances” refers to compositions having the characteristic retention times for peaks 1-11 in Table 1 identified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), where the HPLC measurements are made using a Develosil column ODS-UG-5; 5 micrometers; 250×4.6 mm, a mobile phase of sodium perchlorate buffer solution (pH 2.5)/CH3CN 90:10 (v/v) at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate and oven temperature of 45° C. Tables 5-6 and 8-9 provide the amounts of Related Substances observed in various samples during certain stability testing.
For example, a composition formed by lyophilizing ceftolozane and tazobactam separately and then blending these components listed in
A composition formed by co-lyophilizing ceftolozane and tazobactam listed in
The rate of increase in related substances for peaks 1-11 was greater in the co-lyophlized ceftolozane-tazobactam sample of Table 3/
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be manufactured and formulated to reduce the total amount and/or the rate of formation of certain related substances present in the pharmaceutical compositions over time. In particular, ceftolozane-containing compositions can be manufactured and handled in the absence of contact with tazobactam prior to enclosure within a unit dosage form container, for example by lyophilization of a composition comprising ceftolozane sulfate and a stabilizing agent such as sodium chloride (e.g., 125 mg-500 mg of sodium chloride per 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active equivalent). Tazobactam-containing compositions can be manufactured and handled in the absence of contact with ceftolozane prior to enclosure within a unit dosage form container. Preferably, the compositions are obtained by a process comprising the step of first contacting ceftolozane and tazobactam within a unit dosage form container (e.g., a vial), thereby extending the shelf life of the product in comparison to compositions where tazobactam and ceftolozane are first contacted in a blend outside of the unit dosage form container and subsequently transferred to the unit dosage form container.
The pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be prepared by a process wherein the ceftozolane and tazobactam are individually lyophilized in the absence of one another, followed by aseptically combining the individually lyophilized ceftozolane and tazobactam within a unit dosage form container. Alternatively, the pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be prepared by a co-filling process, wherein the ceftozolane and tazobactam are individually lyophilized in the absence of one another, followed by co-filling the individually lyophilized ceftozolane and tazobactam in a vial. In an embodiment of the co-filling method, ceftolozane and tazobactam are sequentially administered into a vial. Specific methods of lyophilization are described in Example 1 and Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chapter 84, page 1565, Eighteenth Edition, A. R. Gennaro, (Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1990).
The products include a ceftolozane composition prepared and handled in the absence of tazobactam by forming a first aqueous solution comprising ceftolozane sulfate and other components including excipients, stabilizers, pH adjusting additives (e.g., buffers) and the like. Non-limiting examples of these additives include sodium chloride, citric acid and L-arginine. For example, the use of sodium chloride results in greater stability; L-arginine is used to adjust pH of the aqueous solution (e.g., to pH 5-7) and to increase the solubility of ceftolozane; and citric acid is used to prevent discoloration of the product, due to its ability to chelate metal ions. Preferably, the first aqueous solution comprises about 125 mg-500 mg sodium chloride per 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active. The ceftolozane can be included as an amount of ceftolozane sulfate of formula (I) containing at least about 1,000 mg ceftolozane active.
The products include a tazobactam composition prepared and handled in the absence of ceftolozane by forming a second solution comprising tazobactam acid. The tazobactam can be included in an amount providing about 500 mg of tazobactam acid per 1,000 mg ceftolozane active (i.e., a 1:2 weight ratio of tazobactam acid to ceftolozane active). Tazobactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor of the structure of formula (II) in its free acid form.
Unless otherwise indicated, tazobactam can be a free acid, a sodium salt, an arginine salt, or a hydrate or solvate thereof.
A first presentation of a ceftolozane-tazobactam antibiotic product is a single unit dosage form container that includes the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition (as described above) first combined (blended) within a unit dosage form container. The single unit dosage form container can be obtained by a “split-fill” process comprising the steps of: (a) sequential, aseptic filling of a ceftolozane composition and a tazobactam composition into a unit dosage form container; (b) blanketing the unit dosage form container with an inert gas; and (c) sealing the unit dosage form container, where the ceftolozane composition is prepared and handled in the absence of tazobactam prior to filling into the unit dosage form container, and the tazobactam composition is prepared and handled in the absence of ceftolozane prior to filling into the unit dosage form container. The unit dosage form container can have any suitable configuration or presentation, including a vial or bag, which is sealed to isolate the product from air outside the container. Preferably, the unit dosage form container includes a means for injecting a liquid (e.g., a self-sealing rubber surface on a cap) into the container, such as saline or water for injection, to reconstitute the product as a solution. The ceftolozane composition is preferably obtained in the absence of tazobactam by a process comprising the step of lyophilizing a solution comprising ceftolozane (e.g., as ceftolozane sulfate) and 125 mg-500 mg sodium chloride per 1,000 mg ceftolozane active. The solution can be an aqueous solution that also includes an alkalizing agent (e.g., L-arginine) and/or a chelating agent (e.g., citric acid). The tazobactam composition is preferably obtained in the absence of ceftolozane by a process comprising the step of lyophilizing a solution comprising tazobactam (e.g., as tazobactam acid) and an alkalizing agent such as sodium bicarbonate or sodium hydroxide. The solution can be an aqueous solution. Alternatively, the tazobactam composition can be a crystalline form of tazobactam such as tazobactam sodium or tazobactam arginine crystal solid forms, not prepared by lyophilization. The ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition are first combined within a unit dosage form container, preferably in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the equivalent amounts of ceftolozane active and the amount of tazobactam free acid. Unit dosage forms for the treatment of certain infections (e.g., complicated urinary tract infections and/or complicated intra-abdominal infections) can comprise a total of 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active and a total of 500 mg of tazobactam active. Unit dosage forms for the treatment of other infections (e.g., pneumonia infections) can comprise a total of 2,000 mg of ceftolozane active and a total of 1,000 mg of tazobactam active.
Alternatively, pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be obtained by first combining ceftolozane and tazobactam within a unit dosage form container in a liquid solution, then lyophilizing the solution within the unit dosage form container (“co-lyophilized compositions”). The unit dosage form containers obtained by co-lyophilization within a unit dosage form container can include (e.g., up to about 1%) an additional substance having an HPLC retention time of about 1.22 relative to that of ceftolozane (see, e.g.,
The compound of formula (III) has a relative retention time (RRT) of 1.22 (relative to ceftolozane using the HPLC analysis). This compound is also referred to herein as “the compound RRT 1.22.” Without being bound by theory, the compound RRT 1.22 can be formed by a reaction between ceftolozane and formylacetic acid, a by-product of tazobactam as illustrated in Marunaka et al. (Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, Vol. 36 (11), pp. 4478-4487.
The lyophilization of a composition within the unit dosage form container is based in part on the discovery that compositions having lower initial amounts of total Related Substances were obtained by lyophilizing a solution comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam.
Referring to the data tables in
A two-container product presentation can be obtained by separately packaging ceftolozane in the absence of tazobactam, and tazobactam in the absence of ceftolozane. The second product presentation comprises separate unit dosage form containers obtained by a “two-container” process comprising the steps of: (a) aseptic filling and sealing of a ceftolozane composition in a first unit dosage form into a first container in the absence of tazobactam; (b) aseptic filling and sealing of a tazobactam composition in a first unit dosage form into a second container in the absence of ceftolozane; and (c) packaging the first container and the second container as a single product for later combination in a fixed dose combination of the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the amount of ceftolozane active and tazobactam free acid. These steps can be performed in any order. The two-container product presentation can also be obtained by a process comprising the steps (performed in any order) including: (a) providing a ceftolozane composition prepared in the absence of tazobactam, (b) providing a tazobactam composition prepared in the absence of ceftolozane, (c) aseptic filling and sealing of the ceftolozane composition in a first unit dosage form into a first container; (d) aseptic filling and sealing of the tazobactam composition in a second unit dosage form into a second container in the absence of ceftolozane; and (c) packaging the first container and the second container as a single product for later combination in a fixed dose combination of the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the amount of ceftolozane active and tazobactam free acid.
In the two-container product presentation, the blended composition is formed by first contacting ceftolozane and tazobactam after opening the containers (e.g., at a location for treating a patient, such as a hospital pharmacy). The two-container product presentation includes a first sealed container comprising ceftolozane obtained and provided in the absence of tazobactam and a second sealed container comprising tazobactam comprising tazobactam obtained and provided in the absence of ceftolozane. The first container and the second container can be opened and the ceftolozane and tazobactam compositions can be combined in a fixed weight ratio corresponding to a 2:1 weight ratio between the amount of ceftolozane active and the amount of tazobactam free acid in the first and second compositions, respectively. The resulting blended composition comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam can be reconstituted in a pharmaceutically acceptable liquid (e.g., physiological saline, or water for injection) for intravenous administration to a patient in need thereof.
The two-container unit dosage form can be obtained by a process comprising the steps of: (a) aseptic filling of a ceftolozane composition into a first container; (b) blanketing the first container with an inert gas; (c) sealing the first container, where the ceftolozane composition is prepared and handled in the absence of tazobactam prior to filling into the first container; (d) aseptic filling of a tazobactam composition into a second container; (e) blanketing the second container with an inert gas; (f) sealing the second container, where the tazobactam composition is prepared and handled in the absence of ceftolozane prior to filling into the unit dosage form container; and (g) packaging the first container and the second container together in a unit dosage form package with instructions for combining the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition in a fixed dose combination prior to administration to a patient.
The containers and packages can have any suitable configuration or presentation, including a vial or bag, which is sealed to isolate the ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition both from each other and from air outside the containers. The ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition can be combined after opening each respective container either in powder or liquid form in a fixed dose ratio. Preferably, each container includes a means for injecting a liquid (e.g., a self-sealing rubber surface on a cap) into the container, such as saline or water for injection, to reconstitute the product as a solution. The ceftolozane composition in a first container is preferably obtained in the absence of tazobactam by a process comprising the step of lyophilizing a solution comprising ceftolozane (e.g., as ceftolozane sulfate) and 125 mg-500 mg sodium chloride per 1,000 mg ceftolozane active. The solution can be an aqueous solution that also includes an alkalizing agent (e.g., L-arginine) and/or a chelating agent (e.g., citric acid). The tazobactam composition in the second container is preferably obtained in the absence of ceftolozane by a process comprising the step of lyophilizing a solution comprising tazobactam (e.g., as tazobactam acid) and an alkalizing agent such as sodium bicarbonate or sodium hydroxide. The solution can be an aqueous solution. Alternatively, the tazobactam composition in the second container can be a crystalline form of tazobactam such as tazobactam sodium or tazobactam arginine crystal solid forms, not prepared by lyophilization.
The ceftolozane composition and the tazobactam composition are first combined after packaging of the two-container unit dosage form, preferably in a weight ratio of 2:1 between the equivalent amounts of ceftolozane active and the amount of tazobactam free acid. Unit dosage forms for the treatment of certain infections (e.g., complicated urinary tract infections and/or complicated intra-abdominal infections) can comprise a total of 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active and a total of 500 mg of tazobactam active (obtained from at least two containers). Unit dosage forms for the treatment of other infections (e.g., pneumonia infections) can comprise a total of 2,000 mg of ceftolozane active and a total of 1.00 mg of tazobactam active (obtained from at least two containers).
Pharmaceutical compositions in one or more unit dosage forms can be co-lyophilized compositions and/or blended compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam and can be formulated to treat infections by parenteral administration (including subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous) administration.
Pharmaceutical compositions may additionally comprise excipients, stabilizers, pH adjusting additives (e.g., buffers) and the like. Non-limiting examples of these additives include sodium chloride, citric acid and L-arginine. For example, the use of sodium chloride results in greater stability; L-arginine is used to adjust pH and to increase the solubility of ceftolozane; and citric acid is used to prevent discoloration of the product, due to its ability to chelate metal ions. In one particular embodiment, the pharmaceutical compositions described herein are formulated for administration by intravenous injection or infusion.
The amount of the compound of formula (III) can be increased in the composition as disclosed herein (e.g., by heating a sample produced by co-lyophilzation of tazobactam and ceftolozane in an aqueous solution, followed by heating of the lyophilized product to increase the amount of the compound of formula (III)). The compound of formula (III) can also be isolated from compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam and then re-combined with ceftolozane and/or tazobactam to form compositions with desired concentrations of the compound of formula (III). Pharmaceutical compositions can include less than 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.13%, 0.15%, 0.30%, 0.38%, 0.74% or 0.97% of the compound of formula (III), as measured by HPLC. Other pharmaceutical compositions can include a range from less than about 0.03% (e.g., see minimum detected amounts in Tables 4-5) to about 1.0% (e.g., maximum detected amount of RRT 1.22 in Tables 4-5) or more of the compound of formula (III) including compositions comprising 0.03%-0.05%, 0.05%, 0.05%-0.13%, 0.05%-0.15%, 0.03%-0.13%, 0.05%- of the compound of formula (III), where the % of the compound of formula (III) as measured by HPLC using a Develosil column ODS-UG-5; 5 micrometers; 250×4.6 mm, a mobile phase of sodium perchlorate buffer solution (pH 2.5)/CH3CN 90:10 (v/v) at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate and oven temperature of 45° C. The pharmaceutical antibiotic compositions can include ceftolozane or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and an amount of the compound of formula (III). Compositions can also be made comprising the compound of formula (III) in the absence of tazobactam and/or in the absence of ceftolozane.
In one example, a pharmaceutical composition in a unit dosage form container comprises ceftolozane sulfate and tazobactam in a ratio of 1,000 mg ceftolozane active per 500 mg of tazobactam active and up to about 1%, more preferably up to about 0.03%-0.05%, of a compound of formula (III) as measured by HPLC using a Develosil column ODS-UG-5; 5 micrometers; 250×4.6 mm, a mobile phase of sodium perchlorate buffer solution (pH 2.5)/CH3CN 90:10 (v/v) at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate and oven temperature of 45° C. The pharmaceutical composition obtained by a process comprising the steps of lyophilizing an aqueous solution comprising ceftolozane sulfate, tazobactam (e.g., tazobactam free acid and/or tazobactam sodium), 125 mg to 500 mg of sodium chloride per 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active, L-arginine and/or citric acid in an amount effective to adjust the pH of the first aqueous solution to 5-7 (e.g., 6-7) prior to lyophilization to obtain a first lyophilized ceftolozane composition.
Alternatively, the pharmaceutical composition comprising up to about 1% of a compound of formula (III) as measured by HPLC (e.g., with HPLC using a Develosil column ODS-UG-5; 5 micrometers; 250×4.6 mm, a mobile phase of sodium perchlorate buffer solution (pH 2.5)/CH3CN 90:10 (v/v) at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate and oven temperature of 45° C.) can be obtained by a process comprising the steps of: (a) lyophilizing a first aqueous solution in the absence of tazobactam, the first aqueous solution comprising ceftolozane sulfate, 125 mg to 500 mg of sodium chloride per 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active, L-arginine and/or citric acid in an amount effective to adjust the pH of the first aqueous solution to 5-7 (e.g., 6-7) prior to lyophilization to obtain a first lyophilized ceftolozane composition; (b) lyophilizing a second solution in the absence of ceftolozane, the second solution comprising tazobactam being lyophilized to form a second lyophilized tazobactam composition; and (c) blending within a unit dosage form container the first lyophilized ceftolozane composition, the second lyophilized tazobactam composition and a composition comprising the compound of formula (III).
The pharmaceutical antibiotic compositions can be provided in a unit dosage form container (e.g., in a vial or bag). The unit dosage form can be dissolved with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and then intravenously administered. A unit dosage form of a pharmaceutical composition can be formulated for parenteral administration for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections or complicated urinary tract infections can enclose a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of formula (III). Compositions can be produced by co-lyophilization or blending in a vial (e.g., Example 1). For example, an aqueous solution comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam in a vial can be lyophilized to obtain a unit dosage form.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for the treatment of bacterial infections in a mammal, comprising administering to said mammal a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition prepared according to the methods described herein. A method for the treatment of bacterial infections in a mammal can comprise administering to said mammal a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising ceftolozane sulfate and sodium chloride. Non-limiting examples of bacterial infections that can be treated by the methods of the invention include infections caused by: aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumonia, Streptococcus pyogenes, Viridans group streptococci), aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms (e.g., Acinetobacter baumanii, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenza, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Citrobacter koseri, Moraxella catarrhalis, Morganella morganii, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens, Providencia stuartii, Providencia rettgeri, Salmonella enterica), gram-positive anaerobes (Clostridium perfringens), and gram-negative anaerobes (e.g., Bacteroides fragilis group (e.g., B. fragilis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, and B. vulgates), Bacteroides distasonis, Prevotella melaninogenica). In certain embodiments of the methods described herein, bacterial infection is associated with one or more of the following conditions: complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and pneumonia (e.g., community-acquired, or nosocomial pneumonia). Community-acquired pneumonia (moderate severity only) can include infections caused by piperacillin-resistant, beta-lactamase producing strains of Haemophilus influenza. Nosocomial pneumonia (moderate to severe) caused by piperacillin-resistant, beta-lactamase producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus and by Acinetobacter baumanii, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
As used herein, “treating,” “treat,” or “treatment” describes the management and care of a patient for the purpose of combating a disease, condition, or disorder and includes the administration of a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention to alleviate the symptoms or complications of a disease, condition or disorder, or to reduce the extent of the disease, condition or disorder. The term “treat” can also include treatment of a cell in vitro or an animal model.
By a “therapeutically effective amount” of a compound of the invention is meant a sufficient amount of the compound to treat the disorder (e.g., bacterial infection). The specific therapeutically effective amount that is required for the treatment of any particular patient or organism (e.g., a mammal) will depend upon a variety of factors including the disorder being treated and the severity of the disorder; the activity of the specific compound or composition employed; the specific composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration, route of administration, and rate of excretion of the specific compound employed; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidental with the specific compound employed; and like factors well known in the medical arts (see, for example, Goodman and Gilman's, “The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics”, Tenth Edition, A. Gilman, J. Hardman and L. Limbird, eds., McGraw-Hill Press, 155-173, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). The therapeutically effective amount for a given situation can be readily determined by routine experimentation and is within the skill and judgment of the ordinary clinician.
As used herein, “1000 mg ceftolozane” refers to an amount of ceftolozane that is considered a bioequivalent by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), i.e. for which 90% CI of the relative mean Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) is within 80.00% to 125.00% of the reference formulation in the fasting state (see: “Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations”. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, 2003).
As used herein, the term “ceftolozane active” refers to active portion of a salt form of ceftolozane, the free base form of ceftolozane.
As used herein, the term “tazobactam active” refers to the active portion of a salt form of tazobactam, tazobactam free acid form.
As used herein, “1,000 mg of ceftolozane as ceftolozane active” refers to an amount of ceftolozane sulfate effective to provide 1,000 mg of ceftolozane. The amount of sodium per gram of ceftolozane activity in a pharmaceutical composition containing ceftolozane sulfate and sodium chloride can be calculated using the relevant molecular weights of ceftolozane, ceftolozane sulfate, sodium chloride and sodium.
There are four main steps in the manufacture of CXA-101 bulk drug product: dissolution, sterile filtration, bulk lyophilization, and packaging into Sterbags®. These four main steps are composed of a total of 20 minor steps. The CXA-101 bulk drug product manufacturing process is presented below.
I. Dissolution
1. The prescribed amount of water for injection (“WFI”) is charged into the dissolution reactor.
2. A prescribed amount of citric acid is added.
3. The solution is cooled at 5° C. to 10° C.
4. A prescribed amount of CXA-101 drug substance is added to the solution.
5. A prescribed amount of L-arginine is slowly added to the solution.
6. A check for complete dissolution is performed. Solution pH is verified to be in the target range of 6.5 to 7.0.
7. A prescribed amount of sodium chloride is added to the solution.
8. A check for complete dissolution is performed. Solution pH is verified to be in the target range of 6.0 to 7.0. If the pH is out of this range adjust with either L-Arginine or citric acid.
9. WFI is added to bring the net weight to 124.4 kg and the solution is mixed well.
10. Samples are withdrawn for testing of final pH.
II. Sterile Filtration
11. The solution is passed through the filter (pore size 0.45 μm) followed by double filters (pore size 0.22 μm) onto a shelf on the Criofarma lyophilizer.
12. The line is washed with WFI.
13. The washing solution is passed from Step 12 through sterile filtration.
III. Bulk Lyophilization
14. The washing solution is loaded onto a separate shelf in the lyophilizer (and later discarded).
15. The solution is lyophilized until dry.
16. The product shelf is cooled to 20° C.±5° C.
IV. Packaging into Sterbags®
17. The lyophilized bulk drug product powder is milled.
18. The milled powder is sieved.
19. The sieved powder is blended for 30 minutes.
20. The powder is then discharged into Sterbags®
Prefiltration and Sterile-Filtration
Filtrate the compounded solution with a sterile tilter-set which consists of a 0.2 um polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filter (Durapore®, Millipore) and a 0.1 urn polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filter (Durapore®, Millipore) connected in tandem. Confirm the integrity of each filter before and after the filtration. Take approximately 100 mL of the filtrate in order to check bioburden.
Filter the prefiltered compounded solution through a sterile filter-set which consists of a 0.2 um polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filter and a 0.1 urn polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filter connected in tandem, and introduce the final filtrate into an aseptic room. Confirm the integrity of each filter before and after the filtration.
Processing of Vial, Stopper and Flip-Off Cap
Wash a sufficient quantity of 28 mL vials with water for injection and sterilize the washed vials by a dry-heat sterilizer. Then transfer the sterilized vials into a Grade A area located in an aseptic room.
Wash a sufficient quantity of stoppers with, water for injection. Sterilize and dry the washed stoppers by steam sterilizer. Then transfer the sterilized stoppers into a Grade A area located in an aseptic room.
Sterilize a sufficient quantity of flip-off caps by steam sterilizer. Then transfer the sterilized flip-off caps into a Grade A or B area located in an aseptic room.
Filling and Partially Stoppering
Adjust the fill weight of the filtered compounded solution to 11.37 g (corresponds to 10 mL of the compounded solution), then start filling operation. Check the filled weight in sufficient frequency and confirm it is in target range (11.37 g±1%, 11.26 to 11.43 g). When deviation from the control range (11.37 g±2%, 11.14 to 11.59 g) is occurred, re-adjust the filling weight.
Immediately after a vial is filled, partially stopper the vial with a sterilized stopper. Load the filled and partially stoppered vials onto the shelves of a lyophilizer aseptically.
Lyophilization to Crimping, Visual Inspection, Labeling and Packaging
After all filled and partially stoppered vials are loaded into a lyophilizer, start the lyophilization program shown in
Unload the lyophilized vials from the chamber and crimp with sterilized flip-off caps.
Subject all crimped vials to visual inspection and label and package all passed vials.
A. Operative Conditions
Gradient Profile:
B. Mobile Phase Preparation.
Sodium Perchlorate Buffer Solution was made by dissolving 14.05 g of sodium perchlorate Monohydrate in 1000.0 mL of water followed by adjusting pH to 2.5 with diluted perchloric acid (1 in 20).
Mobile Phase was then made by mixing Sodium Perchlorate Buffer Solution (pH 2.5) and acetonitrile in the ratio 90:10 (v/v).
Sodium Acetate Buffer Solution pH 5.5 (Diluent) was made by dissolving 1.36 g of sodium acetate trihydrate in 1000.0 mL of water followed by adjusting to pH 5.5 with diluted acetic acid (1 in 10).
C. Sample Preparation.
Sample solution: dissolve 20.0 mg, exactly weighed, of Sample, in 20.0 mL of water (Prepare just before injection into HPLC system).
System Suitability Solution (1%): take 1.0 mL of the Sample Solution (use first sample if more are present) and transfer into a 100.0 mL volumetric flask, dilute with water to volume and mix.
D. HPLC Analysis Procedure
1. Inject Blank (water)
2. Inject System Suitability Solution and check for tailing factor and theoretical plate number for CXA-101 peak:
E. Calculations
I. Report for each related substance is amount as expressed by area percent.
wherein:
Consider as any Unspecified Impurity, each peak in the chromatogram except CXA-101, peaks from 1 to 11 and every peak present in the blank chromatogram and report the largest.
II. Report the total impurities content as expressed by the following formula:
wherein:
Compositions comprising the compound of formula (III) were prepared by the process shown in
A. Preparation of Blend Combination Drug Product
The blend drug product was prepared, as described above in Example 3, on lab scale by use of a small blender. The composition of the blend drug product is shown in Table 3,
B. Stability Test
The sample prepared herein (Example 4A) was put into a stability study. Tables 4 (
C. Conclusion
The data at both 25° C. and at 40° C. have shown that the blending process inhibits formation of amounts of the impurity RRT=1.22 to below the detection limit of the HPLC method of Example 2.
Sterile Dry Blending of Bulk Lyophilized Ceftolozane and Bulk Lyophilized Tazobactam
The CXA-101 produced by Example 1 is blended with lyophilized tazobactam. A low energy drum blender that agitates the material by tumbling and also moving the bed up and down is used. For CXA-101/tazobactam for injection, the blender was charged with 23.4 kg of CXA-101 bulk product, and 5.4 kg of tazobactam bulk product. Both the CXA-101 and tazobactam were individually lyophilized beforehand. The material was blended for 180 minutes. In-process tests of content assay for both CXA-101 and tazobactam were performed to assess the homogeneity using the samples of blend materials taken from three places. The RSD for each of CXA-101 and tazobactam content assay was no greater than 2% and the RSD for the ratio of CXA-101/tazobactam was no greater than 2.2%. (See Table 6 in
The blended powder is then discharged into Sterbags®.
The co-lyophilized combo drug product was prepared as described above in Example 3. The formulation composition of the co-lyophilized combo drug product is shown in
A new impurity having RRT=1.22 was observed in co-lyophilized drug product. The impurity was identified as a degradation product of formula (III) which was formed by a reaction between ceftolozane and formylacetic acid, which was a degradation product of tazobactam. The stability data at 25° C. and at 40° C. have shown that the impurity increases over time.
A. Preparation of Blend Combination Drug Product
The blend drug product was prepared, as described above in Example 5, on lab scale by use of a small blender. The composition of the blend drug product is shown in Table 7. The CXA-101 was obtained by lyophilization of ceftolozane sulfate in the absence of tazobactam, and the tazobactam sodium material was obtained by lyophilization of tazobactam prior to blending of the ceftolozane and tazobactam components.
B. StabilityTest
The sample prepared herein (Example 7A) was put into stability study. The following Tables 8 and 9 (
C. Conclusion
The data at both 25° C. and at 40° C. have shown that the blending process completely inhibits formation of the impurity RRT=1.22.
A stability study of Combo Drug Product for Injection bulk drug product was carried out at long term storage conditions (e.g., 25° C./60% RH), in accordance with ICH guidelines. This formal stability study examined the effect of temperature and humidity on CXA-101/tazobactam for Injection bulk drug product stability when stored in the container closure configuration of Sterbag®.
A stability study of Combo Drug Product for Injection finished drug product was carried out at long term storage conditions (e.g., 25° C., 60% RH), and an accelerated stability condition (e.g., 40° C./75% RH), in accordance with ICH guidelines. This formal stability study examined the effect of temperature and humidity on CXA-101/tazobactam product stability in the container closure configuration of the finish product vial.
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam with less than 0.15% (measured by HPLC according to Example 2) of the compound of formula (III) can be obtained as described herein.
i)L-arginine is added as needed to achieve pH 6.5 ± 0.5; 600 mg per vial is considered a representative total amount.
1)Actual amount of ceftolozane will vary based on the measured potency. Ceftolozane sulfate, 1147 mg, corresponds to 1000 mg ceftolozane free base.
2)L-arginine is added as needed to achieve pH 6.5 ± 0.5; 600 mg per vial is considered a representative total amount.
3)Actual weight of tazobactam sodium will vary based on the measured potency. Tazobactam sodium 537 mg, corresponds to 500 mg tazobactam free acid
4)Nitrogen blanket is applied after powders are dispensed to the vial and prior to insertion of stopper.
A first aqueous solution comprising the ingredients in the ceftolozane drug composition in Table 11 is lyophilized in the absence of tazobactam to provide the lyophilized ceftolozane composition. The first aqueous solution comprises ceftolozane sulfate and the specific excipients in the preferred compositions, in an amount per unit dosage form provided by the quantities and functions as provided in Table 10. All excipients are compendial and typical for sterile pharmaceutical dosage forms, requiring no additional treatment prior to use in the formulation. The excipients are used in levels within the range established in other FDA approved products as described in the Inactive Ingredients Database (IID). A second solution comprising tazobactam acid and sodium bicarbonate is lyophilized in the absence of ceftolozane to obtain the tazobactam sodium composition in Table 11. Subsequently, the lyophilized tazobactam sodium composition is dry blended with the lyophilized ceftolozane composition comprising tazobactam sodium and ceftolozane sulfate in a weight ratio providing 500 mg of tazobactam acid equivalent per 1,000 mg of ceftolozane active equivalent.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/214,221, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/792,092, filed Mar. 15, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/793,007, filed Mar. 15, 2013, each of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4255431 | Junggren et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4332798 | Teraji et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4332800 | Teraji et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4338313 | Teraji et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4339449 | Hashimoto et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4363807 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4367228 | Takaya et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4368325 | Ueda et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4369312 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4370326 | Takaya et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4381299 | Teraji et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4390534 | Teraji et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4394384 | Takaya et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4405617 | Takaya et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4407798 | Kamiya et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4409214 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4409215 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4409217 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4416879 | Takaya et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4420477 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4423213 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4425340 | Teraji et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4425341 | Takaya et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4427677 | Takaya et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4431642 | Teraji et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4430499 | Wheeler | Feb 1984 | A |
4436912 | Wheeler | Mar 1984 | A |
4447429 | Teraji et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452851 | Takaya et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4470980 | Higuchi et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4477447 | Ueda et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4487768 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495182 | Teraji et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4496562 | Takaya et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4499088 | Takaya et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4501739 | Lunn et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4515788 | Takaya et al. | May 1985 | A |
4546101 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4559334 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562073 | Micetech et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4563449 | Teraji et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4577014 | Lunn et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4584290 | Takaya et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590186 | Takaya et al. | May 1986 | A |
4608373 | Shibanuma et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609730 | Takaya et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4622318 | Takaya et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4631274 | Takaya et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4640915 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4690921 | Shibanuma et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698337 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4699980 | Shibanuma et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4703046 | Ueda et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705851 | Takaya et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4735937 | Heusler et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4761410 | Takaya et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4764606 | Imai et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4808711 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4822785 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822787 | Murata et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4861769 | Takaya et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4868174 | Takaya et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871730 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4882434 | Yoshioka | Nov 1989 | A |
4921852 | Murata et al. | May 1990 | A |
4923857 | Murata et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927818 | Takaya et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935507 | Takaya et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4952578 | Sakane et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4960766 | Takaya et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4963543 | Murata et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4963544 | Murata et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4982596 | Paterson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5036064 | Gotschi | Jul 1991 | A |
RE33778 | Iwanami et al. | Dec 1991 | E |
5073550 | Gotschi | Dec 1991 | A |
5081116 | Nagano et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5102877 | Murata et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108997 | Takaya et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109130 | Sakane et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5173485 | Sakane et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5187160 | Sakane et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5215982 | Sakane et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5215983 | Murata et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5244890 | Yamanaka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5286721 | Murata et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5637580 | White et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646139 | White et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648346 | White et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656623 | White et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5763603 | Trickes | Jun 1998 | A |
6235311 | Ullah et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6878686 | Marquess et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6995138 | Marquess et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7129232 | Ohki et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7341993 | Fatheree et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7378408 | Kimball et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7384928 | Nishitani et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7417143 | Gnanaprakasam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7553962 | Fatheree et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7601690 | Fatheree et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612037 | Fatheree et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649080 | Fatheree et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655621 | Fatheree et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8476245 | Jan-Ji Lai et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8476425 | Lai et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8809314 | He et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8906898 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8968753 | Terracciano et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9044485 | Terracciano | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9320740 | Terracciano | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20020193587 | Shimabayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030232983 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040248875 | Ohki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004094 | Yamanaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050096306 | Yamanaka et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171077 | Ruppen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228176 | Gnanaprakasam et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060051412 | Petereit et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084639 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099253 | Becker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173177 | Gego et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060269485 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293516 | Wada et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070054899 | Park et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116770 | Garms et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070286817 | Tatapudy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286818 | Tatapudy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015156 | Udayampalayam Palanisamy et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080103121 | Gole et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160067 | Boeckh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080233196 | Cattaneo et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090098088 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090155387 | Zhang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156517 | Zhang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156518 | Zhang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090186865 | Diago et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227554 | Liversidge et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090274662 | Magowan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275552 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291102 | Fortin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090311234 | Koski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040548 | Yu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100286031 | Charm et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110044917 | Tosetti | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110190252 | Watson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110257079 | Chaudhary et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130065874 | Chandorkar et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130289012 | Gu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296290 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296291 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296292 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296293 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296555 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303504 | Gu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345190 | Gu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140187528 | Lai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206659 | Lai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213567 | Lai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140262868 | Terracciano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274989 | Terracciano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274990 | Terracciano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274991 | Damour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274992 | Damour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274993 | Terracciano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274994 | Damour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274995 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274996 | Damour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274997 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274998 | Terracciano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275000 | Damour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303136 | Terracciano et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309205 | Terracciano et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150045336 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150150883 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160000921 | Terracciano | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160228448 | Hwang | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1235689 | Apr 1988 | CA |
2140701 | Jul 1995 | CA |
1236781 | Dec 1999 | CN |
101434610 | May 2009 | CN |
101696212 | Apr 2010 | CN |
102020663 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102382123 | Mar 2012 | CN |
0047977 | Sep 1981 | EP |
0097446 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0137442 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0664117 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1273586 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1285923 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1468697 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1134222 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1671974 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1686131 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1759697 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1787641 | May 2007 | EP |
1974721 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2062581 | May 2009 | EP |
2062582 | May 2009 | EP |
2062585 | May 2009 | EP |
2305251 | Apr 2011 | EP |
4288086 | Oct 1992 | JP |
2005162670 | Jun 2005 | JP |
199512601 | May 1995 | WO |
WO0004915 | Feb 2000 | WO |
200050035 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2002090363 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2002092605 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2002102378 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2003066053 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003104241 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004019901 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004039776 | May 2004 | WO |
2004066976 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004098643 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005074925 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006044600 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006045006 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006088305 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007065862 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007086011 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007086013 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007086014 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007099396 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007129176 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007145866 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007145868 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008030469 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008065247 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008075207 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008101743 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008113177 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009048603 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009122252 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009134948 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010014285 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2011101710 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011112435 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011127200 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2013014497 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO2013030733 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2013036783 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2014052799 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abstract for Cabot et al. ‘Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Resistance Development Requires Multiple Mutations Leading to Overexpression and Structural Modification of AmpC’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster C1-060. |
Abstract for Jacqueline. ‘In vivo Activity of CXA-101 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Rabbit Experimental Pneumonia: Comparison with Ceftazidime Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Imipenem’. 51st Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2011); Sep. 17-20, 2011; Chicago, IL Poster B-590. |
Abstract for Reynolds et al. ‘Enterobacteriaceae in the UK and Ireland: Susceptibility to Old and New Agents’. 52nd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2012); Sep. 9 12, 2012; San Francisco, CA. Poster C2-152. |
Abstract for Miller et al. ‘Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Ceftolozane/tazobactam 3 g every 8 Hours and Cumulative Fraction of Response in Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid in a Simulated Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Population’. 52nd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2012); Sep. 9-12, 2012; San Francisco, CA. Poster A-624. |
Abstract for Melchers et al. ‘In vitro Activity of CXA-101 Alone and in Combination With Tazobactam Against Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase Harbouring Enterobacteriaceae’. 52nd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2012); Sep. 9-12, 2012; San Francisco, CA. Poster E 198. |
Abstract for Zilberberg et al. ‘Prevalence of beta-lactam resistance among P. aeruginosa in US hospitals, 2000-2009’. To be presented at the 2nd Annual IDWeek (IDWeek 2013); Oct. 2-6, 2013; San Francisco, CA. Poster #1580. |
Abstract for Cabot et al. ‘Dynamics and mechanisms of resistance development to ceftazidime, meropenem and ceftolozane-/tazobactam in wild-type and mutator P. aeruginosa strains’. 52nd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2012); Sep. 9-12, 2012; San Francisco, CA. Poster C1-1970. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms isolated from health care associated urinary tract infections: Results from the Program to Assess Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS)’. To be presented at the 2nd Annual IDWeek (IDWeek 2013); Oct. 2-6, 2013; San Francisco, CA. Poster. |
Abstract for Zilberberg et al. ‘Secular trends in gram-negative resistance among urinary tract infection hospitalizations in the US, 2000-2009’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P1517. |
Abstract for Vanscoy et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) of Tazobactam in Combination with Ceftolozane in an In Vitro Infection Model’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P900. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intraabdominal infections in European and United States hospitals (2012)’. To be presented at the 2nd Annual IDWeek (IDWeek 2013); Oct. 2-6, 2013; San Francisco, CA. Poster #698. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections in European and United States hospitals (2009-2011)’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P1516. |
Abstract for Chandorkar et al. ‘Population Pharmacokinetics (PPK) Meta-Analysis of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Healthy Volunteers and Patients’. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP 2013); Oct. 13-16, 2013; Albuquerque, NM. Poster # 120. |
Abstract for Chandorkar et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Subjects with Severe Renal Impairment or End Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis’. To be presented at the 2nd Annual IDWeek (IDWeek 2013); Oct. 2-6, 2013; San Francisco, CA. Poster #723. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from United States (USA) medical centers (2011-2012)’. To be presented at the 2nd Annual IDWeek (IDWeek 2013); Oct. 2-6, 2013; San Francisco, CA. Poster #695. |
Wooley et al. ‘Impact of renal function on the pharmacokinetics and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 2249-2255. |
Sader et al. ‘Post-β-Lactamase-Inhibitor Effect of Tazobactam in Combination with Ceftolozane on Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Strains’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 2434-243. |
Cabot et al. ‘Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Resistance Development Requires Multiple Mutations Leading to Overexpression and Structural Modification of AmpC’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Mar. 17, 2014. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 24637685. |
Snydman et al. ‘Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against a Broad Spectrum of Recent Clinical Anaerobic Isolates’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 1218-1223. |
Zhanel et al. ‘Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination with Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli’. Drugs. 2014 vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 31-51. |
Vanscoy et al. ‘Pharmacological basis of β-lactamase inhibitor therapeutics: tazobactam in combination with Ceftolozane’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013. vol. 57 No. 12, pp. 5924-5930. |
Toda et al. ‘FR264205, A Novel Parenteral Antipseudomonal Cephem: Synthesis and SAR of 3-(2,4-Disubstituted 3-Aminopyrazolio)methyl Cephalosporins’. 46th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2006); Sep. 27-30, 2006; San Francisco, CA. Oral Presentation F1-0240. |
Walkty et al. ‘In vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals in the CANWARD study, 2007 to 2012’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013, vol. 57, No. 11, pp. 5707-5709. |
Hong et al. ‘Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and β-lactamase-inhibitor combination’. Infect Drug Resist 2013 vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 215-223. |
Zilberberg et al. ‘Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among specimens from hospitalized patients with pneumonia and bloodstream infections in the United States from 2000 to 2009’. J Hosp Med. 2013 vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 559-563. |
Zilberberg et al. ‘Secular Trends in Gram-Negative Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Hospitalizations in the United States, 2000-2009’. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013, vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 940-946. |
Hayakawa et al. ‘Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Isolation of Escherichia coli Producing CTX-M-Type Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase in a Large U.S. Medical Center’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 4010-4018. |
Vanscoy et al. ‘Relationship between Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Exposure and Drug-Resistance Amplification in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jun. 17, 2013. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23774429. |
Vanscoy et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Tazobactam in Combination with Ceftolozane in an In Vitro Infection Model’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 2809-2814. |
Craig et al. ‘In-Vivo Activity of Ceftolozane, a New Cephalosporin, with and without Tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, including Strains with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases, in the Thighs of Neutropenic Mice’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 1577-1582. |
Jacqueline et al. ‘Efficacy of ceftolozane in a murine model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pneumonia: in vivo antimicrobial activity and impact on host inflammatory response’. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 177-183. |
Miller et al. ‘CXA-201 dose selection based on probability of target attainment and drug exposure in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment’. 51st Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2011); Sep. 17-20, 2011; Chicago, IL. Oral Presentation A-1099. |
Titelman et al. ‘In vitro activity of CXA-101 plus tazobactam against CTX-M-14- and CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae’. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 137-141. |
Ge et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics and safety of CXA-101, a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin, in healthy adult male and female subjects receiving single- and multiple-dose intravenous infusions’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 3427-3431. |
Juan et al. ‘Activity of a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin, CXA-101, against carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains’. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 846-851. |
Sader et al. ‘Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Tested Against Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates from Hospitalized Patients with Pneumonia in European Hospitals (2011)’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Oral Presentation O-181. |
Nicasio et al. ‘PK-PD of Tazobactam (TAZ) in Combination with Piperacillin (PIP) in an In Vitro Infection Model (IVIM)’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Oral Presentation. |
Miller et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Intravenous Ceftolozane-Tazobactum in Healthy Adult Subjects following Single and Multiple Ascending Doses’. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2012. vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 3086-3091. |
Lehr et al. ‘Particulate Matter Contamination of Intravenous Antibiotics Aggravates Loss of Functional Capillary Density in Postischemic Striated Muscle’. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, vol. 165, pp. 514-520. |
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI Document M07-A9; Jan. 2012, vol. 32, No. 2 (88 pages). |
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI Document M100-S22; Jan. 2012, vol. 32, No. 3 (188 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14160151.8, dated May 13, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/028642, dated Aug. 7, 2014, 14 pages. |
Arin et al, ‘The Comparative Stability of Different Types of Penicillin and Cephalosporin N-pyrryl derivatives’. Pharmazie 1988, vol. 43, pp. 18-19. |
Cefazolin, (For Injection USP) Approved Dec. 1988, Product Label, B. Braun Medical Inc. Revised Jan. 2012. |
Ceftazidime, (Systemic) Approved Nov. 1985, Product Label. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Inc. 2004. |
Claforan, (Sterile-Cefotaxime for injection, USP & Injection—Cefotaxime injection) Approved Prior to Jan. 1982, Product Label. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC 2011. |
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, ‘Cubist Announces Positive Results from Two Phase 2 Trials, CXA-201 and CDAD Program’. Cubist Press Release. Jun. 2011. |
Doribax, Approved Oct. 2007, Product Label. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2007. |
Fortaz, (ceftazidime for Injection) (Ceftazidime Injection) Approved Jul. 1985, Product Label. GlaxoSmithKline 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/028642 dated Aug. 7, 2014; 4 pages. |
International Patentability Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/028642 dated Sep. 15, 2015; 8 pages. |
EPO Search Report for European Patent Application No. 1616871.5-1460 dated Oct. 26, 2016; 11 pages. |
Ambrose, et al: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations in the design of hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia studies: look before you leap!; Clin Infect Dis, 2010, vol. 51, Suppl 1, pp. 5103-S110. |
American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia; Am J Respir Crit Care Med., 2005, vol. 171(4), pp. 388-416. |
Baughman, et al: The diagnosis and treatment challenges in nosocomial pneumonia; Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, vol. 33(2), pp. 131-139. |
Bergogne-Berezin: Predicting the efficacy of antimicrobial agents in respiratory infections: is tissue concentration valid measure?; J Antimicrob Chemother, 1995, vol. 35, pp. 363-371. |
Boselli, et al: Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g10.5 g administered to critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia; Intensive Care Med, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 976-979. |
Boselli, et al: Alveolar concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam administered in continuous infusion to patients with—associated pneumonia; Crit Care Med, 2008, vol. 36, pp. 1500-1506. |
Chastre, et al: Ventilator-associated pneumonia; Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002, vol. 165(7), pp. 867-903. |
Chastre, et al: Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial; JAMA, 2003, vol. 290(19), pp. 2588-2598. |
El Solh: Update on the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia; J Antimicrob Chemother, 2009, vol. 64, pp. 229-238. |
Freire, et al: Comparison of tigecycline with imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of hospital-acquired penumonia; Diag Microbio and Infec Dis, 2010, vol. 68, pp. 140-151. |
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine: Hospital-Acquired (Nosocomial) Pneumonia; ed. Kasper, et al.; 16th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division. 2005, pp. 1538-1541. |
Jones, et al: Microbial etiologies of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia; Clin Infect Dis; 2010, Suppl 1, pp. S81-S87. |
Joseph, et al: Ventilator-associated pneumonia: A Review; EurJ Intern Med; 2010, vol. 21(5), pp. 360-368. |
Klevens, et al: Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002; Public Health Rep, 2007, vol. 122, pp. 160-166. |
Knaus, et al: APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system; Crit Care Med, 1985, vol. 13, pp. 818-829. |
Komuro, et al: Inhibition of the renal excretion of tazobactam by piperacillin; J Antimicrob Chemother, 1994, vol. 34, pp. 555-564. |
Lucasti: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Ceftobiprole Medocaril Versus Linezolid Plus Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia; Ceftobiprole: Clinical Study Report Synopsis BAP00248/307; Issue Date: Jul. 14, 2010; Document No. EDMS-PSDB-6906024:3.0, (8 pages). |
Mesaros, et al: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium; Clin Microbiol Infect, 2007, vol. 13, pp. 560-578. |
Occhipinti, et al: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose piperacillin-tazobactam regimens; Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1997, vol. 41, pp. 2511-2517. |
Pankey: Tigecycline; J Antimicrob Chemotherapy, 2005, vol. 56, pp. 470-480. |
Pea: The antimicrobial therapy puzzle: could pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships be helpful in addressing the issue of appropriate pneumonia treatment in critically ill patients?; Clin Infect Dis, 2006, vol. 42, pp. 1764-1771. |
Richards, et al: Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System; Crit Care Med, 1999, Vo1.27(5), pp. 887-892. |
Schulgen, et al: Estimation of extra hospital stay attributable to nosocomial infections: heterogeneity and timing of events; J Clin Epidemiol; Apr. 2000, vol. 53(4), pp. 409-417. |
Singh:et al: Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription; Am J Respir Crit Care Med, Aug. 2000, vol. 162(2, Pt 1), pp. 505-511. |
Udy, et al: Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill; Clin Pharmacokinet, 2010, vol. 49(1), pp. 1-16. |
Vincent, et al: Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Crit Care Med, 1998, vol. 26(11), pp. 1793-1800. |
Wunderink, et al: Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study; Clin Infect Dis, 2012, vol. 54(5), pp. 621-629. |
Zilberberg, et al: Epidemiology of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP); Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2009, vol. 30, pp. 10-15. |
Zosyn®. Prescribing Information. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA; http://labeling.pfizer.com/showlabeling.aspx?id=416 (Apr. 23, 2012, date last accessed), 26 pages. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Tested Against Gram-negative Bacterial Isolates from Hospitalized Patients with Pneumonia in United States (USA) and European (EU) Hospitals (2012)’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster C2-1633. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Post Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Effect of Tazobactam When Associated with Ceftolozane and Tested against ESBL-Producing Strains’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster A-1030. |
Abstract for Vanscoy et al. ‘Relationship between Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) Exposure and E. coli Resistance Amplification Prevention in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model (HFIM)’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster A-1031. |
Abstract for Vanscoy et al. ‘Identification of a Translational Relationship Between Tazobactam (TAZ) Exposure in Combination with Ceftolozane (TOL) and Efficacy Against ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster A-1032. |
Abstract for Zhanel et al. ‘In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against 5,715 Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Pathogens Isolated from Patients in Canadian Hospitals in 2011 and 2012: CANWARD Surveillance Study’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster E-1689. |
Abstract for Zilberberg et al. ‘Multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalized patients with pneumonia, US 2000-2009’. Making a Difference in Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy Conference (MAD-ID 2013); May 9-11, 2013; Orlando, FL. Encore Presentation from ISICEM 2013. |
Abstract for Zilberberg et al. ‘Gram-negative resistance and need for ICU among urinary tract infections in the US’. Making a Difference in Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy Conference (MAD-ID 2013); May 9-11, 2013; Orlando, FL. Encore Presentation from ISICEM 2013. |
Abstract for Zilberberg et al. ‘Multidrug resistance among P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae in the US hospitals, 2000-2009’. Making a Difference in Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy Conference (MAD-ID 2013); May 9-11, 2013; Orlando, FL. Encore Presentation from SCCM 2013. |
Abstract for Chandorkar et al. ‘Target Attainment Rates (TAR) and Cumulative Fraction of Response (CFR) in Plasma for Ceftolozane in a Simulated Population of Patients with Complicated Intra-abdominal (cIAI) and Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI)’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P2742. |
Abstract for Halimi et al. ‘Comparative Evaluation of Ceffolozane/tazobactam MIC testing with Etest® and CLSI Broth Microdilution Methods’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P1606. |
Abstract for Reynolds et al. ‘Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK and Ireland: Susceptibility to Old and New Agents’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P1519. |
Abstract for Sader et al. ‘Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from 14 European countries and Israel’. 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology (ECCMID 2013); Apr. 27-30, 2013; Berlin, Germany. Poster P337. |
Abstract for Noel et al. ‘Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Gram Negative Bacilli’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster. |
Abstract for Melchers et al. ‘Pharmacokinetics of Tazobactam and Ceftolozane Alone and in Combination in Mice’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster A-1033. |
Abstract for Melchers et al. ‘Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane Combined with Tazobactam in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster A-1034. |
Abstract for Lucasti et al. ‘A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) plus Metronidazole (MTZ) Compared to Meropenem (MER) in Adult Patients with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI)’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster K-1709. |
Abstract for Estabrook et al. ‘In vitro Activity of CXA-201 (Ceftolozane-Tazobactam) Against 200 CTX M-Producing Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates’. 53rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013); Sep. 10-13, 2013; Denver, CO. Poster E-1169. |
Abstract for Bulik et al. ‘In vitro activity of CXA-101, a novel cephalosporin, against resistant phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa’. 47th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society (IDSA 2009); Oct. 29-Nov. 1, 2009; Philadelphia, PA. Poster 209. |
Abstract for Moya et al. ‘Activity of CXA-101 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-lactam resistance mechanisms: ampD, ampDh2, ampDh2, dacB, and oprD mutations’. 49th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2009); Sep. 12-15, 2009; San Francisco, CA. Poster F1-1989. |
Abstract for Livermore et al. ‘Chequerboard titrations of cephalosporin CXA-101 and tazobactam vs. beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae’. 49th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2009); Sep. 12-15, 2009; San Francisco, CA. Poster F1-1994. |
Abstract for Jacqueline et al. ‘ED50 Determination of CXA-101 Alone and in Combination with Tazobactam for Treating Experimental Peritonitis in Mice Due to ESBL-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains: Comparison with Ceftazidime and Piperacillin/Tazobactam’. 50th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2010); Sep. 12-15, 2010; Boston, MA. Poster B-708. |
Maxipime, (Cefepime Hydrochloride, USP) Approved Jan. 1996, Product Label. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Revised Mar. 2009. |
Yamana et al, ‘Comparative Stability of Cephalosporins in Aqueous Solution: Kinetics and Mechanisms of Degradation’. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1976, vol. 65, No. 11, pp. 1563-1574. |
Rocephin, (Ceftiaxone Sodium) Approved Aug. 1993, Product Label. Roche Laboratories, Copyright 1998. |
Zithromax, (azithromycin injection) Approved Sep. 1994, Product Label. Pfizer Labs, Revised Feb. 2013. |
Teflaro, (Ceftaroline fosamil) Approved Oct. 2010, Product Label. Forst Laboratories, Inc. 2010. |
Thomson et al. Beta-Lactamase Production in Memebers of the Family Enterobacteriaceae and Resistance to Beta-Lactam-Enzyme Inhibitor Combinations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990;34:622. |
Strayer et al. Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin Alone and in Combination with Tazobactam against Piperacillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Organisms in an In Vitro Model of Infection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1994;38:2351. |
Steenbergen et al. Potency of CXA-101Tazobactam for Pathogens from ICU and non-ICU Correlated to Probability of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Target Attainment. ICAAC 2011. Oral Presentation A-1689. |
Soon et al. A Novel Mathematical Modeling Approach to Characterize the Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/ Tazobactam, a β-lactam & β-lactannase Inhibitor Combination. 52nd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2012); Sep. 9-12, 2012. Oral Presentation A-1762. |
Seetulsingh et al. Activity of Clavulanate Combinations against TEM-1 b-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia Coli Isolates Obtained in 1982 and 1989. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1991;27:749. |
Miller et al. CXA-201 dose selection based on probability of target attainment and drug exposure in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment. ICAAC 2011. Oral Presentation A-1099. |
Louie et al., Pharmacodynamics of b-Lactamase Inhibition by NXL104 in Combination with Cefaroline: Examining Organisms with Multiple Types of b-Lacramases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2012, 56, 258. |
Lister et al. Importance of Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Pharmacokinetics in the Pharmacodynamics of Inhibitor-Drug Combinations: Studies with Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Piperacillin-sulbactam. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1997;41:721. |
Kurpiel. Point Mutations in the Inc Antisense RNA Gene Are Associated with Increased Plasmid Copy Number, Expression of BlaCMY-2 and Resistance to Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Escherichia Coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2012;67:339. |
European Committee on Antimicrobial Sus Testing 2012. |
Giske et al, ‘Activity of Cephalosporin CXA-101 and Comparators against Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa’. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009, vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 430-431. |
Jacqueline et al, ‘Efficacy of Ceftolozane in a Murine Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pneumonia: in vivo Antimicrobial Activity and Impact on Host Inflammatory Response’. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2012, vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 1-7. |
Livermore et al, ‘Activity of Cephalosporin CXA-101 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia strains and Isolates’. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2009, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 402-406. |
Takeda et al, ‘Stability of FR264205 against AmpC beta-lactamase of Pseudomonas aeruginoas’. International Journal Antimicrobial Agents, 2007. vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 443-445. |
Takeda et al., In vitro and in vivo activities of a new cephalosporin, FR264205, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51(3):826-30. |
Toda et al, Synthesis and SAR of Novel Parenteral Anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins: Discovering of FR264205. Med Chem Lett. 2008, vol. 18, No. 17, pp. 4849-4852. |
Alexov et al. Efficacy of Ampicillin-Sulbactam Is not Dependent upon Maintenance of a Critical Ratio between Components: Sulbactam Pharmacokinetics in Pharmacodynamic Interactions. Antimcirobial Agents Chemotherapy 1996;40:2468. |
Bush et al. Kinetic Interactions of Tazobactam with Beta-Lactamases from All Major Structural Classes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1993;37:851. |
Hatano et al. In vivo Anti-Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Activity of Novel Parenteral Cephalosporin, FR264205. 45th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2005); Dec. 16-19, 2005. Oral Presentation F-1165. |
Sader, et al. Antimicrobial Activity of CXA-101, A Novel Cephalosporin Tested in Combination with Tazobactam against Enterobacteraiaceae, Pseudomonas, aeruginosa and Bacteroides . . . ; Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, No. 5, Feb. 14, 2011, pp. 2390-2394. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160193221 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61793007 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61792092 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14214221 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15071530 | US |