Certain interior environments, such as clean rooms and hospital like operating rooms, radiology rooms, and dental suites, require unusually clean air for the protection of the work that takes place in them. Such rooms may also have disparate heating or cooling needs at different points in the room. For instance, electronic equipment may produce excess heat, therefore requiring that cooled air be concentrated in its vicinity. Surgeons may also find it prudent to have available additional heated or cooled air in the immediate vicinity of an operating table, to hold a patient at a stable temperature or dissipate the excess heat created by bright lamps or a team of doctors and nurses surrounding the patient. However, the needs of a given room can change over time, as new technology replaces what was originally installed or the room is converted to uses or configurations other than the original. For these reasons, it is undesirable to have air conditioning and ventilation permanently installed as part of the structure of the building. Additionally, when multiple parties provide equipment for these spaces, there is significant coordination required during the design and construction phase to avoid conflicts and interferences in product and schedule. Instead, modular systems which may be installed or removed with only minor structural alterations are desirable.
Modular installation has the additional advantage of making construction less expensive and more convenient. Ventilation structures need not be custom fabricated on-site, nor incorporated into the structure during construction. Instead, modular units may be mass-produced at a factory off-site and shipped to the building when it is ready to receive them. On-site fabrication is then limited to such fabrication and alterations as are necessary to attach the modular units to the building's frame.
In modern operating rooms equipment such as robotic surgical aids are becoming more and more prevalent. These devices make surgery more precise and less prone to errors caused by the inherent fallibility of human hands. Additionally, even in more conventional clean environments, there is a significant requirement for overhead-supported equipment such as light and equipment booms, automated material handling systems, etc. Typically, such equipment is hung from the building structure and descends through the ceiling in order to preserve valuable floor space. However, this arrangement is subject to the similar problems as hard-wired ventilation: it is expensive, requires a custom installation during building construction, and may limit the possible room configurations based on the nature of the underlying building frame.
The present invention solves the problems of the prior art and permits the convenient, cost-effective, and easily alterable installation of surgical aids, or any other form of apparatus, from the ceiling of a room, including an operating or clean room. This is accomplished by providing a truss connected to a modular ventilation plenum, the truss being capable of supporting the apparatus to be hung. The truss's position within the plenum may be selected to allow some flexibility relative to the building's underlying frame, and the plenum itself, being of a modular design, may be mounted in a variety of locations. Both truss and plenum may be assembled off-site, installed after the majority of building construction is complete, and repositioned much more easily than systems tied directly to the underlying structure. In addition, the present invention allows the convenient co-location of two items both required directly over the operating area, with neither interfering with the other: ventilation and equipment support. It also allows installation of a modular equipment support without ventilation, if preferred.
The present design also includes a suspended grid system of the type commonly found in commercial ceilings within the plenum itself, to preserve the continuity of the ceiling in the room. This grid is designed to accommodate a smaller equipment support attached to a suspended grid system, allowing the placement of smaller and lighter surgical apparatus, illumination, or similar necessities.
Turning now to
The plenum 10 is formed from a perimeter 14 of material, conventionally sheet steel although any sufficiently rigid material will do, using methods well known in the art. The plenum 10 is typically a rectangle or square, and is built in a size chosen to accommodate the heating and cooling needs of the building as well as to accommodate the structure to which it is to be attached. The perimeter 14 is given enhanced rigidity by the presence of lower lip 16 and upper rail 18. The upper rail 18 provides the primary structural member of the plenum 10. The rail is typically constructed of steel 0.188 inches thick, formed into a rectangular tube about 3″×4″. The upper rail 18 is welded to sheet steel wall 15, and lower rail 16 is formed by bending wall 15. Grid members 20 may be attached to lower lip 16, forming a grid of supports for the ordinary parts of a suspended ceiling, such as ceiling tiles, lights, and vents for air passage (not shown). Alternatively, grid members may be attached to the sheet steel wall 15 directly. Grid members 20 are conventionally constructed as rectangular tubes or U-shaped channels of stainless steel, or extruded aluminum, but may be constructed of other materials and in other shapes as well. The grid members 20 are sufficiently rigid that that they span the plenum 10 without additional support, easing attachment of the plenum 10 to the building structure and installation of the grid members 20. Grid members 20 may also be attached to the building structure, for instance by the use of additional hangars 12, for greater load-bearing capacity.
The plenum 10 may be sealed at the top to control airflow by plenum roof 22, best shown in
A truss 30, best shown in
The truss 30 may also be installed as part of the perimeter 14 of a plenum, or even between two neighboring plenums 10, forming a part of the perimeter 14 of each. In this configuration, the truss 30 may be open to airflow. The truss 30 may also be closed to airflow, for instance by attachment of a sheet of metal across one or both sides of the truss 30.
The truss 30 may incorporate dedicated passageways for routing of electrical conduits or lines supplying such things as natural gas, refrigerant, water, gases such as oxygen or nitrogen, or vacuum.
An equipment interface plate 42 is mounted to the truss 30 between the lower spars, and provides a mounting location for heavy equipment 44, such as robotic surgical aids. This plate is most commonly metal, but may be any material of suitable strength. Preferably, the equipment interface plate 42 has a bolt-hole pattern 43 which matches that of heavy equipment 44 to permit convenient installation and removal without the need for adapters or jigs. The holes may be threaded or clearance holes. The equipment interface plate 42 may be welded to truss 30, or bolted for easier installation and removal. Other attachment methods, such as riveting, are also possible. It may be manufactured “blank,” without any bolt-hole pattern 43, and then machined to match whatever heavy equipment 44 is ultimately selected.
The weight of the heavy equipment 44 is transferred by the truss 30 to the upper rail 18 (and to some degree, to the remainder of perimeter 14), and thence to the hangars 12 and into the building's structure. The truss 30 may be independent of the grid members 20, so that any movement in the truss 30 is not directly transferred to the grid members 20, and vice versa. This may be advantageous when, for instance, a light (not shown) attached to grid members 20 is manually adjusted; the movement of the light will have a minimal effect on the heavy equipment 44 suspended from the truss 30. When the truss 30 and grid members 20 are structurally independent, they may be loaded independently of each other, with reference only to the total load that the plenum 10 and hangars 12 can support. On the other hand, the truss 30 and grid members 20 may be linked together. This configuration provides maximum load-bearing capacity and maximum lateral stability for the heavy equipment 44 mounted on the truss 30.
The truss 30 shown in the drawings, when constructed out of welded tube steel and connected to the plenum 10, can support at least 900 lbs of heavy equipment 44 and can bear at least 8000 ft-lbs of torque about an axis running parallel to the spars 34, 36.
Lighter apparatus 46 may also be attached to the plenum 10 at the grid members 20, either on the top or bottom of these members, by the use of apparatus mount 48. The grid members are obviously not capable of supporting the same amount of weight as the truss 30 due to their flatter construction, and in addition, they must bear the weight of multiple other items, such as lighting. However, apparatus mount 48 is also more versatile than truss 30. It allows the positioning of lighter apparatus 46 in more places, including some not reachable by truss 30, and also permits the repositioning of lighter apparatus 46 much more conveniently. Similar to the operation of truss 30, apparatus mount 48 transfers the weight of lighter apparatus 46 to the grid members 20, which then transfer it to the lower rail 16, then through perimeter 14 and into hangars 12. When used unreinforced, the grid can bear around 300 lbs. in weight. This amount may be raised considerably by hanging a stud 12 from the building's structure and attaching it to the grid members 20 directly for additional support.
Apparatus mount 48 is comprised of frame 50 and support plate 52. As with the other components of the plenum 10, these advantages are best achieved if apparatus mount 48 is bolted to the grid members 20, but it may also be attached in other ways. Similar to equipment interface plate 42, the support plate 52 may be welded to frame 50, but it may also be bolted, riveted, or otherwise attached.
It is also possible for the plenum to be installed with no air-conditioning function at all, purely as a hanger for ceiling-mounted equipment. In that case, the truss 30 or apparatus mount 48 can be mounted within the plenum 10, but without any air-handling component 28, plenum roof 22, or holes 26. This system is modular, convenient, and inexpensive, and may be employed anywhere, whether in a clean room, operating room, or ordinary office or industrial environment that requires equipment to be hung from above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2569910 | Venuti | Oct 1951 | A |
3252400 | Madl, Jr. | May 1966 | A |
4510851 | Sarnosky et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4645158 | Manning | Feb 1987 | A |
5488809 | Lindsay | Feb 1996 | A |
5885154 | Napadow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5971572 | Rouchon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6034873 | Ståhl et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6132309 | Panelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6514137 | Panelli et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6870092 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7125332 | Beaver et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7224472 | Bauch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7921489 | Newkirk | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937903 | McGee | May 2011 | B2 |
7944692 | Grantham et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8434526 | Pinkalla | May 2013 | B1 |
20020078645 | Meyer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050258722 | Sullivan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070254583 | Germagian et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080120924 | Mintie | May 2008 | A1 |
20090151910 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090191809 | Smith | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090239461 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100015909 | Bacharach | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100093268 | McCall et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100190430 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100248609 | Tresh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248610 | Caveney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110009047 | Noteboom et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110141741 | Engstrom | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110214945 | Jolicoeur | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110287704 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110300788 | Caveney | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120272615 | Evans | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150069664 | Ciuperca | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2776558 | Sep 2018 | CA |
102667023 | Sep 2012 | CN |
4317923 | Dec 1994 | DE |
202005020919 | Dec 2006 | DE |
0 785 332 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1 340 470 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2491196 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2491196 | May 2016 | EP |
10-0903018 | Jun 2009 | KR |
WO-9427549 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO-2011049670 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion; dated May 18, 2011; PCT/US2010/046463; 8 pages. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201080047533.5, Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2013”, (w/ English Summary), 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201080047533.5, Voluntary Amendment filed Jan. 24, 2013”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10825363.4, Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“Indian Application Serial No. 3197/DELNP/2012, Request for Examination filed Sep. 19, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/046463, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“Malaysian Application Serial No. PI2012001509, Preliminary Examination dated Jun. 27, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“Philippines Application Serial No. 1/2012/500764, Substantive Examination Report dated Aug. 17, 2013”, 1 pg. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 201202759-5, Search and Examination Report dated Jul. 8, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201080047533.5, Response filed Apr. 16, 2014 to Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2013”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10825363.4, Amendment filed Jul. 7, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10825363.4, Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“Philippines Application Serial No. 1/2012/500764, Substantive Examination Report dated Aug. 5, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10825363.4, Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 22, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,776,558, Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,776,558, Office Action dated May 9, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,776,558, Response filed Oct. 10, 2017 to Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,776,558, Response filed Nov. 8, 2016 to Office Action dated May 9, 2016”, 18 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10825363.4 Response filed Apr. 17, 2015 to Communication Pursuant to Rule 70(2) EPC dated Oct. 10, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“Machine Translation of DE 4317923, published Dec. 1, 1994”, 10 pgs. |
“Machine Translation of WO 94/27549A1, publshed on Dec. 8, 1994”, 12 pgs. |
“Mexican Application Serial No. MX/a/2012/004512, Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2016”. |
“Indian Application Serial No. 3197/DELNP/2012, First Examiner Report dated Nov. 22, 2018”, English translation, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110097986 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |