The present disclosure relates to apparatuses, systems and methods for culturing cells.
The present disclosure relates generally to cell culture inserts for use in culturing cells to promote the formation of spheroids and methods of using these spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts. Spheroids are three-dimensional (3D) cell clusters that can provide more in vivo-like functions to the cells than cells cultured as monolayers in 2D cell culture systems. For certain cell types, such as hepatocytes, spheroids can attain and retain better in vivo-like functionality than their 2D cultured counterparts.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, cell culture inserts for use in culturing cells to promote the formation of spheroids and methods of using these spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts are described. In some embodiments, a cell culture insert as described herein can be nested in another cell culture insert or another cell culture insert can be nested in a cell culture insert as described herein.
In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture insert having a body and a porous membrane. The body has a first open end, a second end wherein the second end defines an opening having a diametric dimension in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm (e.g., 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 and all values and ranges therein between; e.g., 200 to 500, 200 to 700, 400 to 600, etc.), and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end. The one or more sidewalls, or a portion thereof, are sloped (e.g., greater than 5 degrees from perpendicular relative to first or second ends; e.g., >10°, >20°, >30°, >40°, >50°, etc.). The sidewalls, if sloped, are preferably sloped such that the diameter at the second is less than the diameter at the first open end. A porous membrane is disposed over the opening of the second end.
In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture insert having a body and a porous membrane. The body has a first open end, a second end wherein the second end defines an opening, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end. The one or more sidewalls, or a portion thereof, are sloped. The porous membrane is disposed over the opening of the second end and is non-adherent to cells.
In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a permeable support device configured to be at least partially inserted into a reservoir of a cell culture device. The permeable support device comprises a first well having a tapered shape and bottom at least partially defined by a first permeable support.
In various embodiments, the disclosure described a cell culture insert. The insert includes a body having a first open end, a second end, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end. The second end comprises a substrate having an array of microwells defining wells with a porous membrane at the bottom, wherein at least a portion of a substrate having an array of microwells defining a well is sloped.
In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a nested permeable support device comprising a first well having a tapered shape and a bottom portion at least partially defined by a first permeable support, and a reservoir having a bottom located below the first well. In embodiments the reservoir is made from gas permeable material or has an array of microwells or both.
In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a nested permeable support device comprising a first well, a second well and a third well. The first well has a bottom, wherein at least a portion of the bottom is formed by a first porous membrane. The second well has a bottom, wherein at least a portion of the bottom is formed by a second porous membrane. A portion of either the first or the second permeable support may comprise an arcuate shape. The second well and the second permeable support are located below the first well and the first permeable support. The third well has a non-liquid permeable, gas permeable bottom which is located below the second well and the second permeable support.
In another embodiment, the disclosure describes a nested permeable support device comprising a first well, a second well, and a third well. The first well has a substrate forming a microwell array, the bottom of which is a porous membrane. The second well has a substrate forming a microwell array, the bottom of which is a porous membrane. The third well has a substrate forming a microwell array, the bottom of which is a non-liquid permeable, gas permeable support. The second well with the microwell array substrate with the porous membrane bottom is located beneath the first well with the microwell array substrate with the first porous membrane bottom and above the third well with the microwell array substrate with the non-liquid permeable, gas permeable bottom.
Additional features and advantages of the subject matter of the present disclosure will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the subject matter of the present disclosure as described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description present embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the subject matter of the present disclosure as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the subject matter of the present disclosure, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the subject matter of the present disclosure. Additionally, the drawings and descriptions are meant to be merely illustrative, and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any manner.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Reference will now be made in greater detail to various embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure, some embodiments of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference numerals will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or similar parts. However, it will be understood that the use of a number to refer to a component in a given figure is not intended to limit the component in another figure labeled with the same number. In addition, the use of different numbers to refer to components is not intended to indicate that the different numbered components cannot be the same or similar to other numbered components.
The present disclosure describes, among other things, spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts and methods of using spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts. In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts will be contained in a cell culture apparatus. In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts can be placed in another cell culture insert or another spheroid-promoting cell culture insert. In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert can contain another cell culture insert or another spheroid-promoting cell culture insert. In various embodiments, a method of using spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts includes performing an experiment to test a New Chemical Entity (NCE) or a New Biological Entity (NBE).
Cell culture devices or apparatuses that include nested permeable support devices can be adapted to have a spheroid-promoting cell culture insert. Examples of such cell culture devices or apparatuses include TRANSWELL® Permeable Supports (Corning, Inc.), and MILLICELL® Cell Culture Inserts (EMD Millipore), as well as the cell culture articles and methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,537, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety to the extent that it does not conflict with the disclosure presented herein.
Referring now to
The one or more sidewalls 110 of the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts 100 include a portion that is sloped 115. In some embodiments, the one or more sidewalls can be sloped along their entire length. In other embodiments, only a portion of one or more sidewalls is sloped.
The one or more sidewalls 110 and other components of the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts 100 can be formed of any suitable material. Preferably, materials intended to contact cells or culture media are compatible with the cells and the media. Typically, cell culture components are formed from polymeric material. Examples of suitable polymeric materials include polystyrene, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl chloride, polycarbonate, polysulfone, polystyrene copolymers, fluoropolymers, polyesters, polyamides, polystyrene butadiene copolymers, fully hydrogenated styrenic polymers, polycarbonate PDMS copolymers, and polyolefins such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl pentene, polypropylene copolymers and cyclic olefin copolymers, and the like.
The spheroid-promoting cell culture insert 100 includes a body having a first open end 101 and a second end 102 wherein the end 102 defines an opening. A porous membrane 120 can cover the opening of the second end. In some embodiments, the porous membrane 120 can be adherent to cells. In other embodiments, the porous membrane 120, or a portion thereof, can be non-adherent to cells 200.
Referring now to
The porous membrane 120 can have a variety of shapes. In some embodiments, the porous membrane 120 completely covers the opening of the second end of the body of the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert 100. In some embodiments the porous membrane can have an arcuate or curved shape. In some embodiments the second end of the body of the spheroid promoting cell culture insert is comprised of a microwell array with a porous membrane forming the bottom.
The porous membrane can be made of a variety of different materials including but not limited to track-etched membrane or a woven or non-woven porous material. The material of the porous membrane may be treated or coated to make it more adherent or more non-adherent to cells. Treatment may be accomplished by any number of methods known in the art which include plasma discharge, corona discharge, gas plasma discharge, ion bombardment, ionizing radiation, and high intensity UV light. Coatings can be introduced by any suitable method known in the art including printing, spraying, condensation, radiant energy, ionization techniques or dipping. The coatings may then provide either covalent or non-covalent attachment sites. Such sites can be used to attach moieties, such as cell culture components (e.g., proteins that facilitate growth or adhesion). Further, the coatings may also be used to enhance the attachment of cells (e.g., polylysine). Alternatively, cell non-adherent coatings as described above can be used to prevent or inhibit cell binding.
In embodiments, the porous membrane may be a substrate having an array of microwells.
In some embodiments, the spheroid formed by the cells 200 occludes the porous membrane 120 of the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert. (See for example,
The combination of, for example, non-adherent sidewalls, geometry, and gravity can define a confinement volume in which growth of cells cultured in the inserts is limited. In embodiments, this combination can promote the formation of spheroids by cells cultured in the inserts. The confinement volume can be defined by the portion of the one or more sidewalls proximate the second end and the width or diagonal of the second opening. In some embodiments, the portion of the one or more sidewalls proximate the second end d2 is 500 μm, 450 μm, 400 μm, 350 μm, 300 μm, 250 μm, 200 μm, 150 μm, or 100 μm, or any length in between. In some embodiments the confinement volumes are defined by the wells of the microwell array substrate with the porous membrane that forms the bottom of the second opening. In which case, the second opening approximates the size of the first opening with the wells of the microwell array substrate comprising the confinement volume and have a diameter of d1 500 μm, 450 μm, 400 μm, 350 μm, 300 μm, 250 μm, 200 μm, 150 μm, or 100 μm, or any length in between.
Referring back to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the substrate having an array of microwells is comprised of hexagonal close-packed well structures. An image of an embodiment of such a substrate having an array of microwells 410 is shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, a substrate having an array of microwells with a porous support forming the bottom of the microwells 410 covers the second end of the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert 105. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells 410 is non-adherent to cells. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells 410 is adherent to cells. In some embodiments, a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells 410 is porous. In further embodiments, a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells 410 forming the wells 400 includes openings. In some embodiments, the substrate having an array of microwells 410 can be adhered to, affixed to, or juxtaposed with a porous membrane 420. In one embodiment, the second end of the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert 105 is covered by a porous membrane 420, and the porous membrane defines the substrate having an array of microwells 410.
In some embodiments, at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells 410 forming the wells 400 of the spheroid-promoting cell culture insert 105 are sloped. In some embodiments, the substrate having an array of microwells 410 forming the wells 400 can be sloped along the entire depth of the well.
A structured bottom surface as described herein can be formed in any suitable manner. For example, a substrate can be coined, injection molded or embossed to form the substrate having an array of microwells 410. A porous material or a gas permeable material can be coined, injection molded or embossed to form a substrate having an array of microwells.
Referring now to
For example, as shown in
As shown in the embodiment shown is
As shown in
In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts can be used in a method to determine whether a compound or molecule known as a NCE has a desired biological activity. Such methods are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,537. These methods often entail examining the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADME-Tox) of the NCE, as well as determining the NCE's level of effectiveness for the targeted therapeutic indication including pharmacokinetic parameters. One type of assessment examines the “first pass effect.” This assessment involves experimental determination of the bioavailabilty of the NCE following its absorption through the digestive tract and then its metabolism by the liver. Commonly, the assessment of the “first pass effect” requires two separate in vitro assays to be conducted, and the data combined, to determine the intestinal permeability and the hepatic metabolism. If desired, additional studies may be conducted to determine target selectivity, efficacy and dosage (Lau et al., Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 937-942, 2004).
A well-known method used today to examine the intestinal absorption of a NCE is known as the Caco 2 cell-based assay which is typically conducted on permeable supports such as the ones sold under the brand name of Transwell™ and manufactured by Corning Inc. (“Transwell® Permeable Supports: Including Snapwell™ and Netwell™ Inserts—Instructions for Use” Corning Inc., September 2007.) The design of the Transwell™ permeable support facilitates the development of Caco 2 cell polarization to create more in vivo-like test conditions. Researchers from the Schering-Plough Research Institute have expanded the utility of the Caco 2 cell-based assay by adding hepatocytes in the nutrient medium to a Transwell™ receiver plate which receives the Transwell™ permeable support. In this way, the researchers were able to more accurately predict the oral bioavailability of NCE's. However, the hepatic cell viability under these conditions during a 3 hour incubation period was only 50-70%, limiting the potential of this method (Lau et al., Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 937-942, 2004). Another group of researchers from the University of Tokyo co-cultured Caco-2 cells on the Transwell™ permeable support with monolayers of Hep G2 cells growing on the inner surface of the Transwell™ receiver plate. While useful for some assays, the Hep G2 cells did not maintain the functions that are representative of in vivo hepatocytes (Choi et al., Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 18, pages 393-402, 2004).
The current United States Food and Drug Administration Guidance regarding drug interaction studies like the first pass assay recommends the use of in vitro assays with fresh or cryopreserved human hepatocytes due to species specific responses. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al. “Guidance for Industry: Drug Interaction Studies-Study, Design, Data Analysis, and Implications for Dosing and Labeling”, Clinical Pharmacology, September 2006.) However, it is well known that primary hepatocytes loose differentiated function rapidly in standard cell culture conditions on tissue culture treated polystyrene. The loss of normal differentiated hepatocyte function decreases the in vivo-like conditions and hence also decreases the relevance of experimental data in ADME-Tox and pharmacokinetic in vitro assays.
In some embodiments of the methods described herein, hepatocytes or Hep G2 cells used in a Caco 2 cell-based assay are cultured in a spheroid-promoting cell culture insert.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure relates to a nested permeable support device and methods for using the nested permeable support device to perform various experiments to test new therapeutic compounds, NBEs, or NCEs.
In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts can be used to assess system-like communication information. In some embodiments, the spheroid-promoting cell culture inserts can be used to create cell models that represent a series of human organs in vertical orientation.
In one aspect, the nested permeable support device is used to form a first pass assay to determine the bioavailability of a NCE or NBE following absorption from the digestive tract and metabolism by the liver.
In one embodiment, the nested permeable support device 600 can be used to perform a first pass assay to determine the bioavailability of a NCE following absorption through the digestive tract and metabolism by the liver. In another embodiment, the nested permeable support device 600 can be used to perform a first pass assay to determine the bioavailability of a NBE following absorption through the digestive tract and metabolism by the liver.
For instance, a researcher using the embodiment shown in
In parallel, the researcher can place a media in another growing reservoir and then place the middle insert 105 in this growing reservoir. The middle insert 105 is then filled with a volume of hepatocytes in media. The middle insert 105 and reservoir are in communication until a spheroid of hepatocytes is formed across the second permeable support. Tests could also be conducted to assure that the hepatocytes are functioning appropriately. Alternatively, the upper insert 300 and middle insert 105 can be placed in a reservoir 151 to grow the Caco 2 cells and the hepatocytes.
Once the Caco 2 cells and the hepatocytes have been cultured, the upper and middle inserts 300 and 105 would be lifted out of their respective growing reservoirs. The middle insert 105 would be placed (nested) in the reservoir 151 which contains a media. Some media would then be placed above the layer of hepatocytes located within the middle insert 105. Then, the upper insert 300 would be placed (nested) in the middle insert 105. The NCE/NBE and media would be dispensed above the layer of Caco 2 cells located within the upper insert 300. After a period of incubation, the upper insert 300 could be removed and the media in the middle insert 105 could be tested (i.e., LS/MS) to determine if the NCE/NBE passed through the intestinal epithelium (Caco 2 cells). If the NCE/NBE did pass through the Caco 2 cells, then the middle insert 105 could be removed and the media in the reservoir 151 could be tested (i.e., LC/MS) to check the bioavailability of the NCE and/or how the NCE/NBE is metabolized by the liver (hepatocytes) to form metabolic products. The hepatocytes could also show if the NCE/NBE is toxic at the dosage applied. If there are target cells (or molecules) on the bottom of the reservoir 151, then these could be examined (i.e., LC/MS) to determine the drug effects either microscopically, or by using an assay that is separate from the Caco 2 cells and hepatocytes by pulling out the inserts 300 and 105. Alternatively, the target cells (or molecules) on the bottom of the reservoir 151 could be examined using an interrogation system to assess function and viability as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,537. An assay such as this will enable understanding of whether 1) an NCE/NBE can pass through the intestinal epithelium; 2) whether the liver metabolizes or is damaged by an NCE/NBE; and 3) the effect on the target cells of unmodified or liver-metabolized NCE/NBE.
In another embodiment, the nested permeable support device 100 can be used to test a NCE which would not pass through the digestive tract but instead would enter the body via inhalation in which case the Caco 2 cells would be replaced with nasal mucosal cells, bronchial cells or lung epithelial cells, etc. In practice, the researcher would typically select the actual cells used in the nested permeable support device 600.
In some embodiments, particularly where multiple wells are provided on a second end or where nested supports are employed, multiple spheroids may be grown. In some embodiments, the spheroids are all the same. In other embodiments, two or more different types of spheroids are used (e.g., a co-culture system to, for example, simulate or reconstitute the multicellular functionality of an organ). Where cells are imaged or signal generated from the cells is detected, the response from multiple cells may simultaneously be analyzed or the results from individual cells or groups of cells pooled, as desired.
Cells cultured in three dimensions, such as spheroids, can exhibit more in vivo like functionality than their counterparts cultured in two dimensions as monolayers. In two dimensional cell culture systems, cells can attach to a substrate on which they are cultured. However, when cells are grown in three dimensions, such as spheroids, the cells interact with each other rather than attaching to the substrate. Cells cultured in three dimensions more closely resemble in vivo tissue in terms of cellular communication and the development of extracellular matrices. Spheroids thus provide a superior model for cell migration, differentiation, survival, and growth and therefore provide better systems for research, diagnostics, and drug efficacy, pharmacology, and toxicity testing.
In some embodiments, the devices are configured such that cells cultured in the devices form spheroids. For example, the wells in which cells are grown can be non-adherent to cells to cause the cells in the wells to associate with each other and form spheres. The spheroids expand to size limits imposed by the geometry of the wells. In some embodiments, the wells are coated with an ultra-low binding material to make the wells non-adherent to cells.
Examples of non-adherent material include perfluorinated polymers, olefins, or like polymers or mixtures thereof. Other examples include agarose, non-ionic hydrogels such as polyacrylamides, polyethers such as polyethylene oxide and polyols such as polyvinyl alcohol, or like materials or mixtures thereof. The combination of, for example, non-adherent wells, well geometry (e.g., size and shape), and/or gravity induce cells cultured in the wells to self-assemble into spheroids. Some spheroids maintain differentiated cell function indicative of a more in vivo-like, response relative to cells grown in a monolayer. Other cells types, such as mesenchymal stromal cells, when cultured as spheroids retain their pluripotency.
In some embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods herein comprise one or more cells. In some embodiments, the cells are cryopreserved. In some embodiments, the cells are in three dimensional culture. In some such embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods comprise one or more spheroids. In some embodiments, one or more of the cells are actively dividing. In some embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods comprise culture media (e.g., comprising nutrients (e.g., proteins, peptides, amino acids), energy (e.g., carbohydrates), essential metals and minerals (e.g., calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphates, sulphates), buffering agents (e.g., phosphates, acetates), indicators for pH change (e.g., phenol red, bromo-cresol purple), selective agents (e.g., chemicals, antimicrobial agents), etc.). In some embodiments, one or more test compounds (e.g., drug) are included in the systems, devices, and methods.
A wide variety of cell types may be cultured. In some embodiments, a spheroid contains a single cell type. In some embodiments, a spheroid contains more than one cell type. In some embodiments, where more than one spheroid is grown, each spheroid is of the same type, while in other embodiments, two or more different types of spheroids are grown. Cells grown in spheroids may be natural cells or altered cells (e.g., cell comprising one or more non-natural genetic alterations). In some embodiments, the cell is a somatic cell. In some embodiments, the cell is a stem cell or progenitor cell (e.g., embryonic stem cell, induced pluripotent stem cell) in any desired state of differentiation (e.g., pluripotent, multi-potent, fate determined, immortalized, etc.). In some embodiments, the cell is a disease cell or disease model cell. For example, in some embodiments, the spheroid comprises one or more types of cancer cells or cells that can be induced into a hyper-proliferative state (e.g., transformed cells). Cells may be from or derived from any desired tissue or organ type, including but not limited to, adrenal, bladder, blood vessel, bone, bone marrow, brain, cartilage, cervical, corneal, endometrial, esophageal, gastrointestinal, immune system (e.g., T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, leukocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells), liver, lung, lymphatic, muscle (e.g., cardiac muscle), neural, ovarian, pancreatic (e.g., islet cells), pituitary, prostate, renal, salivary, skin, tendon, testicular, and thyroid. In some embodiments, the cells are mammalian cells (e.g., human, mice, rat, rabbit, dog, cat, cow, pig, chicken, goat, horse, etc.).
The cultured cells find use in a wide variety of research, diagnostic, drug screening and testing, therapeutic, and industrial applications.
In some embodiments, the cells are used for production of proteins or viruses. Systems, devices, and methods that culture large numbers of spheroids in parallel are particularly effective for protein production. Three-dimensional culture allows for increased cell density, and higher protein yield per square centimeter of cell growth surface area. Any desired protein or viruses for vaccine production may be grown in the cells and isolated or purified for use as desired. In some embodiments, the protein is a native protein to the cells. In some embodiments, the protein is non-native. In some embodiments, the protein is expressed recombinantly. Preferably, the protein is overexpressed using a non-native promoter. The protein may be expressed as a fusion protein. In some embodiments, a purification or detection tag is expressed as a fusion partner to a protein of interest to facilitate its purification and/or detection. In some embodiments, fusions are expressed with a cleavable linker to allow separation of the fusion partners after purification.
In some embodiments, the protein is a therapeutic protein. Such proteins include, but are not limited to, proteins and peptides that replace a protein that is deficient or abnormal (e.g., insulin), augment an existing pathway (e.g., inhibitors or agonists), provide a novel function or activity, interfere with a molecule or organism, or deliver other compounds or proteins (e.g., radionuclides, cytotoxic drugs, effector proteins, etc.). In some embodiments, the protein is an immunoglobulin such as an antibody (e.g., monoclonal antibody) of any type (e.g., humanized, bi-specific, multi-specific, etc.). Therapeutic protein categories include, but are not limited to, antibody-based drugs, Fc fusion proteins, anticoagulants, antigens, blood factor, bone morphogenetic proteins, engineered protein scaffolds, enzymes, growth factors, hormones, interferons, interleukins, and thrombolytics. Therapeutic proteins may be used to prevent or treat cancers, immune disorders, metabolic disorders, inherited genetic disorders, infections, and other diseases and conditions.
In some embodiments, the protein is a diagnostic protein. Diagnostic proteins include, but are not limited to, antibodies, affinity binding partners (e.g., receptor-binding ligands), inhibitors, antagonists, and the like. In some embodiments, the diagnostic protein is expressed with or is a detectable moiety (e.g., fluorescent moiety, luminescent moiety (e.g., luciferase), colorimetric moiety, etc.).
In some embodiments, the protein is an industrial protein. Industrial proteins include, but are not limited to, food components, industrial enzymes, agricultural proteins, analytical enzymes, etc.
In some embodiments, the cells are used drug discovery, characterization, efficacy testing, and toxicity testing. Such testing includes, but is not limited to, pharmacological effect assessment, carcinogenicity assessment, medical imaging agent characteristic assessment, half-life assessment, radiation safety assessment, genotoxicity testing, immunotoxicity testing, reproductive and developmental testing, drug interaction assessment, dose assessment, adsorption assessment, disposition assessment, metabolism assessment, elimination studies, etc. Specific cells types may be employed for specific tests (e.g., hepatocytes for liver toxicity, renal proximal tubule epithelial cells for nephrotoxicity, vascular endothelial cells for vascular toxicity, neuronal and glial cells for neurotoxicity, cardiomyocytes for cardiotoxicity, skeletal myocytes for rhabdomyolysis, etc.). Treated cells may be assessed for any number of desired parameters including, but not limited to, membrane integrity, cellular metabolite content, mitochondrial functions, lysosomal functions, apoptosis, genetic alterations, gene expression differences, and the like.
In some embodiments, the cell culture devices are a component of a larger system. In some embodiments, the system comprises a plurality (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, . . . , 10, . . . , 20, . . . , 50, . . . , 100, . . . , 1000, etc.) of such cell culture devices. In some embodiments, the system comprises an incubator for maintaining the culture devices at optimal culture conditions (e.g., temperature, atmosphere, humidity, etc.). In some embodiments, the system comprises detectors for imaging or otherwise analyzing cells. Such detectors include, but are not limited to, fluorimeters, luminometers, cameras, microscopes, plate readers (e.g., PERKIN ELMER ENVISION plate reader; PERKIN ELMER VIEWLUX plate reader), cell analyzers (e.g., GE IN Cell Analyzer 2000 and 2200; THERMO/CELLOMICS CELLNSIGHT High Content Screening Platform), and confocal imaging systems (e.g., PERKIN ELMER OPERAPHENIX high throughput content screening system; GE INCELL 6000 Cell Imaging System). In some embodiments, the system comprises perfusion systems or other components for supplying, re-supplying, and circulating culture media or other components to cultured cells. In some embodiments, the system comprises robotic components (e.g., pipettes, arms, plate movers, etc.) for automating the handing, use, and/or analysis of culture devices.
A number of aspects of inserts, methods and assemblies have been disclosed herein. A summary of some selected aspects is presented below. In a first aspect, a cell culture insert comprises (i) a body having a first open end, a second end wherein the second end defines an opening having a diametric dimension in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end; wherein the one or more sidewalls are sloped; and (ii) a porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end.
A second aspect is a cell culture insert according the first aspect wherein at least a portion of the one or more sidewalls are non-adherent to cells.
A third aspect is a cell culture insert according to aspect 1 or aspect 2, wherein at least a portion of the porous membrane is non-adherent to cells.
A fourth aspect is a cell culture insert according to any one of aspects 1 to 3, wherein at least a portion of the porous membrane is adherent to cells.
A fifth aspect is a cell culture insert according to any one of aspects 1 to 4, wherein a portion of the one or more sidewalls proximate the second end at least partially define a cell confinement volume.
A sixth aspect is a cell culture insert according to aspect 5 wherein a depth of the confinement volume is in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm.
A seventh aspect is a cell culture insert according to any one of aspects 1 to 6, wherein the insert is configured such that cells cultured in the insert form a spheroid.
An eighth aspect is a method for culturing a spheroid comprising (i) placing cell culture insert according to aspect 7 in a reservoir, the reservoir having a bottom, wherein insert is placed in the reservoir such that the second end of body of the insert is positioned above the bottom of the insert; (ii) introducing cells into the insert; (iii) introducing a cell culture medium into the insert; and (iv) culturing the cells in the cell culture medium in the insert to form the spheroid.
A ninth aspect is a cell culture assembly, comprising (i) a reservoir defining an interior and having a bottom; and (ii) a first cell culture insert according to any one of aspects 1 to 7 configured to be positioned in the interior of the reservoir such that the second end of the body is above the bottom or the reservoir, wherein the body of the first insert defines an interior of the first insert.
A tenth aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 9, wherein the interior of the first insert, when the first insert is positioned in the interior of the reservoir, is in fluid communication with the interior of the reservoir only through the porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end of the body of the first insert.
An eleventh aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 9 or aspect 10, further comprising a second insert having a body defining an interior, the body comprising a first open end, a second end defining an opening, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end, wherein the second insert is configured to be positioned in the interior of the first insert such that the second end of the body of the second insert above the second end of the body of the first insert.
A twelfth aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 11, wherein the interior of the second insert, when the second insert is positioned in the interior of the first insert, is in fluid communication with the interior of the first insert only through the porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end of the body of the second insert.
A thirteenth aspect is a method comprising (i) introducing target cells and a cell culture medium to an interior of a reservoir of a cell culture assembly according to aspect 12 such that the target cells grow on the bottom of the reservoir; (ii) positioning a first cell culture insert according to aspect 12 in the interior of the reservoir; (iii) introducing a plurality of a first type of cells and a cell culture medium into the interior of the first cell culture insert such that cells of the first type grow as a spheroid in proximity to the porous membrane of the first insert; (iv) positioning a second cell culture insert according to aspect 12 in the interior of the first insert; and (v) introducing a plurality of a second type of cells and a cell culture medium into the interior of the second cell culture insert such that the cells of the second type grow in proximity to the porous membrane of the second insert.
A fourteenth aspect is a method according to aspect 13, wherein the cells of the second type cover the porous membrane of the second insert such that compounds or metabolic derivatives thereof that move from the interior of the second insert to the interior of the first insert pass through the cells of the second type.
A fifteenth aspect is a method according to aspect 14, wherein the cells of the first type attach to the porous membrane of the first insert such that compounds or metabolic derivatives thereof that move from the interior of the first insert to the interior of the reservoir pass through the cells of the first type.
A sixteenth aspect is a method according to aspect 15, further comprising: (i) introducing a test compound to the interior of the second insert; and (ii) identifying an effect of the test compound or a metabolic derivative thereof on the target cells.
A seventeenth aspect is a method according to any of aspects 13 to 16, wherein the cells of the first type are hepatocytes.
An eighteenth aspect is a method according to any of aspects 13 to 17, wherein the cells of the second type are Caco 2 cells.
A nineteenth aspect is a cell culture insert comprising: (i) a body having a first open end, a second end wherein the second end defines an opening, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end; wherein the one or more sidewalls are sloped; and (ii) a porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end, wherein the porous membrane is non-adherent to cells.
A twentieth aspect is a permeable support device configured to be at least partially inserted into a reservoir of a cell culture device, the permeable support device comprising a first well having a tapered shape and bottom at least partially defined by a first permeable support.
A twenty-first aspect is a permeable support device of aspect 20 wherein the well is configured such that cells cultured in the well form a spheroid.
A twenty-second aspect is a permeable support device of either of aspects 20 or 21 wherein at least a portion of the first well is coated with an ultra-low binding material.
A twenty-third aspect is a permeable support device of any of aspect 20 to 22, wherein at least a portion of the permeable support is configured to attach to cells cultured in the first well.
A twenty-fourth aspect is a permeable support device of any of aspects 20 to 23 wherein at least a portion of the first well comprises an arcuate shape
A twenty-fifth aspect is a permeable support device of any of aspects 20 to 24 wherein at least a portion of the first well comprises a conical shape.
A twenty-sixth aspect is a permeable support device of any of aspects 20 to 25 wherein a portion of the well defines a confinement volume.
A twenty-seventh aspect is a permeable support device of aspect 26 wherein a diametric dimension of the confinement volume is in a range from 200 μm to 500 μm.
A twenty-eighth aspect The permeable support device of either of aspects 26 or 27 wherein the depth of the confinement volume is in a range from 100 μm to 500 μm.
A twenty-ninth aspect is a permeable support device of aspect any of aspects 20 to 28 wherein the first well is configured and sized to receive a second well having a bottom, wherein the second well is located above the first well.
A thirtieth aspect is a nested permeable support device comprising: (i) a first well having a tapered shape and a bottom portion at least partially defined by a first permeable support; and (ii) a reservoir having a bottom located below the first well.
A thirty-first aspect is a nested permeable support device of aspect 30 wherein the well is configured such that cells cultured in the well form a spheroid.
A thirty-second aspect is a nested permeable support device of either of aspects 30 or 31 wherein at least a portion of the first well is coated with an ultra-low binding material.
A thirty-third aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspects 29 to 32, wherein at least a portion of the permeable support is configured to attach to cells cultured in the first well.
A thirty-fourth aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspects 30 to 33 wherein at least a portion of the first well comprises an arcuate shape.
A thirty-fifth aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspects 30 to 34 wherein at least a portion of the first well comprises a conical shape.
A thirty-sixth aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspects 30 to 35 wherein a portion of the well defines a confinement volume.
A thirty-seventh aspect is a nested permeable support device of aspect 36 wherein a diametric dimension of the confinement volume is in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm, e.g., 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, or 1000 μm, including ranges between any of the foregoing.
A thirty eighth aspect is a nested permeable support device of either of aspects 36 or 37 wherein the depth of the confinement volume is in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm, e.g., 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, or 1000 μm, including ranges between any of the foregoing.
A thirty-ninth aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspects 30 to 38 further comprising a second well having a bottom at least partially defined by a second permeable support, and wherein the first well and the first permeable support are located below the second well and the second permeable support.
A fortieth aspect is a nested permeable support device of aspect 39 wherein the second well comprises a tapered shape.
A forty-first aspect is a nested permeable support device of any of aspect 30 to 40 wherein the bottom of the reservoir comprises a gas permeable material.
A forty-second aspect is a nested permeable support device comprising: (i) a first well having a bottom, wherein at least a portion of the bottom is formed by a first permeable support; (ii) a second well having a bottom, wherein the bottom of the second well comprises an arcuate shape and at least a portion of the bottom is formed by a second permeable support, and wherein the second well and the second permeable support are located below the first well and the first permeable support; and (ii) a third well having a bottom which is located below the second well and the second permeable support.
A forty-third aspect is a nested permeable support device of aspect 42 wherein at least a portion of the second well is coated with an ultra-low binding material.
A forty-fourth aspect is a cell culture insert comprising a body having a first open end, a second end, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end; and wherein the second end comprises a substrate having an array of microwells defining wells, wherein at least a portion of a substrate having an array of microwells defining a well is sloped.
A forty-fifth aspect is a cell culture insert of aspect 44 wherein the sidewalls are sloped.
A forty-sixth aspect is a cell culture insert of either of aspect 44 or 45 wherein the sidewalls are non-adherent to cells.
A forty-seventh aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 46 wherein at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells is non-adherent to cells.
A forty-eighth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 47 wherein the wells have an inner surface defining an upper aperture and wherein the wells have a diametric dimension at the upper aperture in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm.
A forty-ninth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 48 wherein the wells have a depth in a range from 100 μm to 100 μm.
A fiftieth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 49 wherein at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells is non-adherent to cells.
A fifty-first aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 49 wherein at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells is adherent to cells.
A fifty-second aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 51 wherein at least a portion of the substrate having an array of microwells is porous.
A fifty-third aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 52 wherein the substrate having an array of microwells comprises openings.
A fifty-fourth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 53 wherein the substrate having an array of microwells is adhered to, affixed to, or juxtaposed with a porous membrane.
A fifty-fifth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 54 wherein the second end is covered by a porous membrane.
A fifty-sixth aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 55 wherein the substrate having an array of microwells comprises a sloped surface.
A fifty-seventh aspect is a cell culture insert of any of aspects 44 to 56 wherein the substrate having an array of microwells comprises an array of hexagonal structures.
A fifty-eighth aspect is a cell culture assembly, comprising: (i) a reservoir defining an interior and having a bottom; and (ii) a first cell culture insert according to any one of aspects 44-57 configured to be positioned in the interior of the reservoir such that the second end of the body is above the bottom of the reservoir, wherein the body of the first insert defines an interior of the first insert.
A fifty-ninth aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 58, wherein the interior of the first insert, when the first insert is positioned in the interior of the reservoir, is in fluid communication with the interior of the reservoir only through the porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end of the body of the first insert.
A sixtieth aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 58 or aspect 59, further comprising a second insert having a body defining an interior, the body comprising a first open end, a second end defining an opening, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end, wherein the second insert is configured to be positioned in the interior of the first insert such that the second end of the body of the second insert above the second end of the body of the first insert.
A sixty first aspect is a cell culture assembly according to aspect 60, wherein the interior of the second insert, when the second insert is positioned in the interior of the first insert, is in fluid communication with the interior of the first insert only through the porous membrane disposed over the opening of the second end of the body of the second insert.
A sixty second aspect is a cell culture insert comprising: a body sized for insert into a reservoir of a cell culture device, said body having a first open end, a second end having a porous membrane, and one or more sidewalls extending from the first open end to the second end; wherein the one or more sidewalls are sloped; and wherein said second end has an upper surface defining a plurality of microwells sized for spheroid growth.
A sixty third aspect is the cell culture insert of aspect 62, wherein said microwells each have a diameter in a range from 100 μm to 1000 μm.
Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that any particular order be inferred. Any recited single or multiple feature or aspect in any one claim can be combined or permuted with any other recited feature or aspect in any other claim or claims.
It is also noted that recitations herein refer to a component being “configured” or “adapted to” function in a particular way. In this respect, such a component is “configured” or “adapted to” embody a particular property, or function in a particular manner, where such recitations are structural recitations as opposed to recitations of intended use. More specifically, the references herein to the manner in which a component is “configured” or “adapted to” denotes an existing physical condition of the component and, as such, is to be taken as a definite recitation of the structural characteristics of the component.
While various features, elements or steps of particular embodiments may be disclosed using the transitional phrase “comprising,” it is to be understood that alternative embodiments, including those that may be described using the transitional phrases “consisting” or “consisting essentially of,” are implied. Thus, for example, implied alternative embodiments to a cell culture insert comprising body and a porous membrane include embodiments where a cell culture insert consists of a body and a porous membrane and embodiments where a cell culture insert consists essentially of a body and a porous membrane.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present inventive technology without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Since modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and variations of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the inventive technology may occur to persons skilled in the art, the inventive technology should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents
In the event that any inconsistency exists between the disclosure of the present application and the disclosure(s) of any document incorporated herein by reference, the disclosure of the present application shall govern. The foregoing detailed description and examples have been given for clarity of understanding only. No unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom. The embodiments are not limited to the exact details shown and described, for variations obvious to one skilled in the art will be included within the embodiments defined by the claims.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of components, molecular weights, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the specification and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. All numerical values, however, inherently contain a range necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
Any direction referred to herein, such as “top,” “bottom,” “left,” “right,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” below,” and other directions and orientations are described herein for clarity in reference to the figures and are not to be limiting of an actual device or system or use of the device or system. Many of the devices, articles or systems described herein may be used in a number of directions and orientations. Directional descriptors used herein with regard to cell culture apparatuses often refer to directions when the apparatus is oriented for purposes of culturing cells in the apparatus.
The words “preferred” and “preferably” refer to embodiments that may afford certain benefits, under certain circumstances. However, other embodiments may also be preferred, under the same or other circumstances. Furthermore, the recitation of one or more preferred embodiments does not imply that other embodiments are not useful, and is not intended to exclude other embodiments.
As used herein, “have”, “has”, “having”, “include”, “includes”, “including”, “comprise”, “comprises”, “comprising” or the like are used in their open ended inclusive sense, and generally mean “include, but not limited to”, “includes, but not limited to”, or “including, but not limited to”.
“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event, circumstance, or component, can or cannot occur, and that the description includes instances where the event, circumstance, or component, occurs and instances where it does not.
Unless otherwise specified, “a,” “an,” “the,” and “at least one” are used interchangeably and mean one or more than one.
Also herein, the recitations of numerical ranges by endpoints include all numbers subsumed within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, 5, etc.). Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, examples include from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another aspect. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
For any method disclosed herein that includes discrete steps, the steps may be conducted in any feasible order. And, as appropriate, any combination of two or more steps may be conducted simultaneously.
A number of abbreviations are used herein. A listing of some of those abbreviations and their meaning are presented below:
All headings are for the convenience of the reader and should not be used to limit the meaning of the text that follows the heading, unless so specified.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/492,730 filed on Apr. 20, 2017, which is a continuation application of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US15/58053 filed on Oct. 29, 2015, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/069,996, filed on Oct. 29, 2014, the contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2947116 | Wilton et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
3630849 | David et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
4382685 | Pearson | May 1983 | A |
4498785 | de Bruyne | Feb 1985 | A |
4534656 | de Bruyne | Aug 1985 | A |
4670396 | Bear et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4760028 | de Bruyne et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4927764 | Lyman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4980293 | Jeffs | Dec 1990 | A |
5047347 | Cline | Sep 1991 | A |
5151366 | Serkes et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5171994 | Bahraman | Dec 1992 | A |
5171995 | Gast et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5240854 | Berry et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5272084 | O'Connell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5319436 | Manns et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5374557 | Verma | Dec 1994 | A |
5398837 | Degrassi | Mar 1995 | A |
5487872 | Hafeman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5554536 | Rising | Sep 1996 | A |
5598262 | Jutard et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5665562 | Cook | Sep 1997 | A |
5693537 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707869 | Wolf et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710043 | Pay | Jan 1998 | A |
5736397 | Garcia et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759494 | Szlosek | Jun 1998 | A |
5766949 | Liau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5783440 | Stevens | Jul 1998 | A |
5792653 | Weibezahn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5858309 | Mathus et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5972694 | Mathus | Oct 1999 | A |
6030829 | Dannoux et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039972 | Barlow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6306646 | Saad et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6348999 | Summersgill et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6514464 | Knebel | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521451 | Potter | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6567675 | Rosen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6767607 | Tanner et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6811752 | Barbera-Guillem | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6908767 | Bader | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7470424 | Kataoka et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7547547 | Dang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7674346 | Clements et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687262 | Cattadoris | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691369 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727759 | Ozawa et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745209 | Martin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745210 | Martin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7800749 | Leblanc et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7897379 | Kenney et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919319 | Jervis et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8053230 | Whittlinger | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8143053 | Yerbic | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148152 | Kolossov et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158426 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158427 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163537 | Martin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8168432 | Wilson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8178345 | Bennett et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8273572 | Martin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8318479 | Domansky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8415144 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8470589 | Martin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
D685497 | Kenney et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
8486692 | Simon | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8597597 | Deutsch et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617879 | Yu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8697443 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8759017 | Owen et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8778669 | Lacey et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8846399 | Martin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8906685 | Takayama et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932544 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9039883 | Guerrieri et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9040293 | Gulzow et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9045721 | Martin et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9068281 | Wu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9126199 | Moritz et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9169460 | Cecchi | Oct 2015 | B2 |
D748812 | Kenney et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
9260684 | Egeler et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9260695 | Crowley et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9389187 | Furnas | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9436990 | Otani et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9493733 | Giles | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494577 | McGarr et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9573128 | McClelland | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9587213 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9636680 | Fattinger et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9732317 | Wilson | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9790465 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9845451 | Martin et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9862918 | Ito | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9933373 | Vild et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10067065 | Alam et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10254274 | Miklas et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
11441121 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11613722 | Martin et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
20020022219 | Clements et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020172621 | Barbera-Guillem | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030031829 | Tanner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030104494 | Ravkin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183958 | Goff et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030186217 | Bader | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215941 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040091397 | Picard | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101955 | Whitley | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125266 | Miyauchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040216835 | Tanner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259242 | Malinge et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259423 | Elbaz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032208 | Oh et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047971 | Clements et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074873 | Shanler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112030 | Gaus | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116717 | Dransfield et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147959 | Frondoza et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060110822 | Robbins et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060234370 | Korpinen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252044 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060292654 | Reardon | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070178441 | Li | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216897 | Sonda | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080003671 | Martin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009027 | Fraker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080118974 | Martin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080206857 | Kenney et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080268515 | Cullimore et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297784 | Leblanc et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080299649 | Martin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080300278 | Torrens et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017540 | Nishio et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018033 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029462 | Beardsley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037293 | Unger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090170190 | Nishi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191620 | Martin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090288963 | Guerrieri et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298164 | Cattadoris et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090298166 | Fang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100055774 | Wilson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068793 | Ungrin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074515 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093075 | Mueller | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112014 | Gilbert et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100112684 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119418 | Clements et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100170790 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190197 | Martin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100197013 | Kamp et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100247386 | Deutsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273258 | Lannutti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100296084 | Berg et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100297600 | Cecchi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110086375 | Ungrin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097790 | Yerbic | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110129923 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110229961 | Higashi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120064627 | Khine et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120129208 | Khine et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129257 | Yu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120219572 | Prockop et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130052331 | Kram et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130122539 | Li et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122580 | Tsukada et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130143254 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164848 | Munaka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130203159 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130344598 | Nistor | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140004086 | Peak | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027784 | Wada et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140099717 | Fraker et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106394 | Ko et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106452 | Vukasinovic | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140120573 | Tavana et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140178992 | Nakashima et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140221225 | Danen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226004 | Son et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140227784 | Ejiri et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240489 | Furnas | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140315296 | Wilson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322806 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150004686 | Goral et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150064738 | Tsukada et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150072405 | Ito | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150184119 | Tsukada et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150247112 | Orr et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160003796 | Kranbuehl | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160017267 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160040120 | Gottwald et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160137962 | Ejiri et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160194588 | Guenat et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216250 | Ritter et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160250631 | Kang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170067009 | Sloane et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067019 | Ho | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170073625 | Kasuto et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170226455 | Fang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170267959 | Martin et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170283757 | Carter et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170306281 | Martin et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170342363 | Fang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180166743 | Lee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180201888 | Miwa et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180301754 | Badding et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190006707 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200064197 | Furnas | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200131461 | Martin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200199006 | Jain et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200239854 | Ayano et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210062126 | Martin et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20220220434 | Martin et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220259540 | Li et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004256209 | Jan 2005 | AU |
2558946 | Jan 2005 | CA |
2679011 | Sep 2008 | CA |
2848875 | Mar 2013 | CA |
2186755 | Jan 1995 | CN |
1168921 | Dec 1997 | CN |
1234112 | Nov 1999 | CN |
1867663 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1875093 | Dec 2006 | CN |
201626959 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101978041 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102105578 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102257123 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102449135 | May 2012 | CN |
102687023 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202450098 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202849407 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103080294 | May 2013 | CN |
103119151 | May 2013 | CN |
203513696 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103814125 | May 2014 | CN |
204608026 | Sep 2015 | CN |
204702760 | Oct 2015 | CN |
204714819 | Oct 2015 | CN |
204752742 | Nov 2015 | CN |
204803327 | Nov 2015 | CN |
205170866 | Apr 2016 | CN |
205669029 | Nov 2016 | CN |
205839030 | Dec 2016 | CN |
205990396 | Mar 2017 | CN |
107109340 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107109341 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107208025 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107460125 | Dec 2017 | CN |
8309876 | Dec 1983 | DE |
10019862 | Nov 2001 | DE |
202006017853 | Jan 2007 | DE |
102009005526 | Jul 2010 | DE |
102014214077 | Jan 2016 | DE |
102014017728 | Jun 2016 | DE |
0307048 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0605527 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0681846 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0800571 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0834552 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0965633 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1181349 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1348533 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1445022 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1988152 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2032262 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2617807 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2653531 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2759592 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2896684 | Jul 2015 | EP |
3081627 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3296018 | Mar 2018 | EP |
3351615 | Jul 2018 | EP |
3372666 | Sep 2018 | EP |
2147100 | May 1985 | GB |
03-139350 | Jun 1991 | JP |
06-038734 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-327462 | Nov 1994 | JP |
09-173049 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-234811 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-210866 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-210966 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2001-106749 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2003-135056 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-180335 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-129558 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-535829 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-080660 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-121991 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-191809 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2007-510429 | Apr 2007 | JP |
3139350 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009-017810 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-050194 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-183288 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-542230 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-088347 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-104327 | May 2010 | JP |
2010-518879 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010-158214 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2011-509686 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-521642 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011-172533 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011-528226 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2012-249547 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-055911 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014-132869 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015-012827 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015-029431 | Feb 2015 | JP |
2015-073520 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2016-002023 | Jan 2016 | JP |
5845185 | Jan 2016 | JP |
2016-093149 | May 2016 | JP |
2016-136920 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2016-136921 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2017-532970 | Nov 2017 | JP |
2018-108032 | Jul 2018 | JP |
10-2014-0113139 | Sep 2014 | KR |
10-2014-0125662 | Oct 2014 | KR |
10-2017-0008539 | Jan 2017 | KR |
9207063 | Apr 1992 | WO |
9307258 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9621851 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9815355 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9831466 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0180997 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0192462 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004044120 | May 2004 | WO |
2004094060 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005047464 | May 2005 | WO |
2006043267 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2007015770 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007097120 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008006104 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008008149 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008106771 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008118500 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008140295 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008149039 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008153783 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009094125 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009148509 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009148512 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010008566 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010042072 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010069589 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2012036011 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012077683 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012170232 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013042360 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013108293 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013116449 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014042162 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014072432 | May 2014 | WO |
2014140181 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014156455 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014165273 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014171782 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014179196 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2014196204 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015033507 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015061907 | May 2015 | WO |
2015087369 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2016020992 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016064757 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016069885 | May 2016 | WO |
2016069892 | May 2016 | WO |
2016069895 | May 2016 | WO |
2016069917 | May 2016 | WO |
2016069930 | May 2016 | WO |
2016157322 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2017025584 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017047735 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017077163 | May 2017 | WO |
2017142410 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2018068034 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018200893 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2019010401 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019014621 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019014627 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019014635 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019014636 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019178039 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Liu et al. “Quasi-spherical microwells on superhydrophobic substrates for long term culture of multicellular spheroids and high throughput assays” Biomaterials and Cancer 35 (2014) pp. 6060-6068. |
Liu et al; “Advanced Micromachining of Concave Microwells for Long Term On-Chip Culture of Multicellular Tumour Spheroids”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 35 Pages. |
Lonza Inc., “SeaPrep Agarose: An Ultralow Gelling, Soft Agarose”, Available Online at <http://www.lonzabio.jp/catalog/pdf/pd/PD031.pdf>, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Lovett et al. “Vascularization Strategies for Tissue Engineering” Tissue Engineering Part B, 2009, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 353-370. |
Lquid Surge Control, LLC; “The Latest in Drop-In Baffle Technology”; 2 Pages; (2019). |
Lu et al. “Galactosylated PVDF membrane promotes hepatocyte attachment and functional maintenance.” Biomaterials 2003;24:4893-903. |
Markovitz-Bishitz, “A polymer microstructure array for the formation, culturing, and high throughput drug screening of breast cancer spheroids” Biomaterials and Biotechnology 31 (2010) pp. 8436-8444. |
Martin et al., “Agarose And Methylcellulose Hydrogel Blends For Nerve Regeneration Applications”, J. Neural Eng., vol. 5, 2008, pp. 221-231. |
Messner et al, Multi-cell type human liver microtissues for hepatotoxicity testing. Archives of Toxicology, Nov. 11, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mimetas the Organ-On-A-Chip Company; “Organ-On-A-Chip Models for Science and Pharma”; 4 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://mimetas.com/. |
Mironov et al; “Organ Printing: Tissue Spheroids as Buliding Blocks” Biomaterials, 2009; 30 (12) 2164-2174. |
Murphy et al; “3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs”; Nature Biotechnology, vol. 32, No. 8. Aug. 2014, pp. 773-785. |
Nortis; “Bridging the Gap Between In Vitro and In Vivo Research”; 16 Pages; (2015); https://www.nortisbio.com/. |
Organovo, “Pioneering Bioprinted Tissues to Treat Disease”; 2 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020) http://organovo.com/. |
Otsuka et al, “Two-dimensional multiarray formation of hepatocyte spheroids on a microfabricated PEG-brush surface.” ChemBioChem 2004; 5:850-855. |
Polyimide: Japan Polyimide and Aromatic Polymers Study Group, 2010, pp. 364-371 Table 2. |
Rezende et al, “Scalable Biofabrication of Tissue Spheroids for Organ Printing”; Sciverse Science Direct, Procedia CIRP 5, (2013) 276-281. |
Sa et al. “Round-bottomed Honeycomb Microwells: Embryoid body shape correlates with stem cell fate” Journal of Developmental Biology and Tissue Engineering vol. 4(2), pp. 12-22, May 2012. |
Sakai et al, “Large-scale preparation and function of porcine hepatocyte spheroids.” Int J Artif Organs 1996; vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 294-301. |
Sakai et al, “Technique for the Control of Spheroid Diameter Using Microfabricated Chips”; Sciencedirect, Acta Biomaterialia 3 (2007) 1033-1040. |
Sakai et al; “Detachably Assembled Microfluidic Device for Perfusion Culture and Post-Culture Analysis of Spheroid Array”; Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9, 971-979. |
Sakai et al; “Technique for the Control of Spheroid Diameter Using Microfabricated Chips”; Sciencedirect, Acta Biomaterials 3 (2007) 1033-1040. |
Satoh et al, “A Pneumatic Pressure-Driven Multi-Throughput Microfluidic Circulation Culture System” Lab Chip, 2016, 16, 2339-2348. |
Seldon et al; “Evaluation of Encapsulated Liver Cell Spheroids in a Fluidised-Bed Bioartificial Liver for Treatment of Ischaemic Acute Liver Failure in Pigs in the Translational Setting”: PLOS One; Dec. 2013, vol. 8, Issue 12, 12 Pages. |
Stemcell Technologies, Reproducible and Uniform Embryoid Bodies Using AggreWell Plates, StemCell Technologies, Version 3.0.0, Mar. 2011, Catalog #29146, pp. 1-28. |
Tara; “Innovating Predictive Cardiac Physiology”; 4 Pages; (2019) http://tarabiosystems.com/. |
The Lab Depot(Registered) Products for Discovery Lab Supplies; Shake Flasks, 3 and 4 Baffles Product Information; 5 Pages (2019). |
Tissue Dynamics, “Disruptive Drug Development”; 3 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://www.tissuedynamics.com/. |
Tissuse; Technology, Available on (https://www.tissuse.com/en/technology/), Accessed May 11, 2021, 4 pages. |
Tobe et al, “Receptor-mediated formation of multilayer aggregates of primary cultured adult rat hepatocytes on tactose-subsliluled polystyrene” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 184(1):225-230. |
Tong et al, “Long-term culture of adult rat hepatocyte spheroids.” Exp Cell Res 1992; 200:326-332. |
Tung et al, “High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using 384 hanging drop array” Analyst, 2011, 136 (3), 473-478. |
Vinci et al. Advances in establishment and analysis of three-dimensional tumor spheroid-based functional assays for target validation and drug evaluation, BMC Biology 2012, 10:29. |
Weegman et al, “Nutrient Regulation By Continuous Feeding Removes Limitations on Cell Yield in the Large-Scale Expansion of Mammalian Cell Spheroids”; PLOS One, 2013, vol. 8, Issue 10, e76611, 10 Pages. |
Wikipedia, “Antiroll Tanks”; 3 Pages; Page Last Edited May 23, 2019. |
Wrighton et al, “Forces of Change: Mechanics Underlying Formation of Functional 3D Organ Buds” Cell Stem Cell, May 7, 2015; 16(5): 453-454. |
Xu et al, “Characterisation of some cytotoxic endpoints using rat liver and HepG2 spheroids as in vitro models and their application in hepatotoxicity studies. I. Glucose metabolism and enzyme release as cytotoxic markers.” Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2003; 189:100-111. |
Yamada et al, “Efficient induction of hepatocyte spheroids in a suspension culture using a water-soluble synthetic polymer as an artificial matrix.” J Biochem 1998; 123:1017-1023. |
Yang et al., “An Agarose-Gel Based Method for Transporting Cell Lines”, Current Chemical Genomics, vol. 3, Jan. 2009, pp. 50-53. |
Zuidema et al., “Fabrication And Characterization Of Tunable Polysaccharide Hydrogel Blends For Neural Repair”, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, No. 4, Apr. 2011, pp. 1634-1643. |
Achilli et al, “Advances in the Formation, Use and Understanding of Multi-Cellular Spheroids”, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. (2012) 12(10):1347-1360. |
Alepee et al, “State-of-the-Art 3D Cultures (Organs-on-a-Chip) in Safety Testing and Pathophysiology”; Transatlantic Think Tank for Toxicology, T4 Workshop Report, Altex 31, 4/14, pp. 441-477, Retrieved From: http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex1406111 (Jul. 14, 2014). |
Aline, “We Engineer Microfluidic Products” ; 7 Pages; (2020) https://alineinc.com/. |
Anada et al; “An Oxygen-Permeable Spheroid Culture System for the Prevention of Central Hypoxia and Necrosis of Spheroids”; Biomaterials, 33, (2012) 8430-8441. |
AxoSIM, Nerve-on-a-Chip Mini-Brain About Team; 6 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); http://axosim.com/. |
Bartosh et al; “Aggregation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCS) Into 3D Spheroid Enhances Their AntiInflammatory Properties”; PNAS, Aug. 3, 2010, vol. 107, No. 31 pp. 13724-13729. |
Bioivt Elevating Science(Registered); 6 Pages; (2020); http://www.hepregen.com/. |
Brandrup et al., “Polymer Handbook”, Fourth Edition, Wiley-Interscience Publication, , Permeability and diffusion data, 1999, 9 pages (Contributors; Preface). |
Carver et al; Multicellular Tumor Spheroids as a Model for Assessing Delivery of Oligonucleotides in Three Dimensions; Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids (2014) 3, E153; 8 Pages. |
Chen et al., “Microfluidic array for three-dimensional perfusion culture of human mammary epithelial cells.” Biomed Microdevices, vol. 13 (2011), pp. 753-758. |
Cheng et al, “MicroRNA-34a Targets Forkhead Box J2 to Modulate Differentiation of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Response to Shear Stress”, J Mol Cell Cardiol. 74 (2014) 4-12. |
Choi et al., “Feasibility of a simple double-layered coculture system incorporating metabolic processes of the intestine and liver tissue: application to the analysis of benzo[a]pyrene toxicity” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 18, pp. 393-402, 2004. |
CN-BIO, “Transforming Drug Discovery and the Lives of Patients”; 5 Pages; (2020) http://cn-bio.com/. |
Colazzo et al, “Shear Stress and VEGF Enhance Endothelial Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells”, Growth Factors, 2014, 32(5): 139-149. |
Corning Life Sciences Product Portfolio; 5 Pages Saved Mar. 6, 2020. |
Corning(Registered) HTS Transwell(Registered)-96 Tissue Culture Systems, Permeable Supports for High Throughput Screening Applications; 2 Pages (2004). |
Curcio et al. “Mass transfer and metabolic reactions in hepatocyte spheroids cultured in rotating wall gas-permeable membrane system.” Biomaterials 28 (2007) 5487-5497. (Year: 2007). |
Dolznig et al, “Organotypic spheroid cultures to study tumor-stroma interaction during cancer development”, Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models, 2011, 8(2-3):113-118. |
Domansky et al, “Perfused Multiwell Plate for 30 Liver Tissue Engineering”, Lab Chip, 2010, 10:51-58. |
Elveflow; “Microfluidics Innovation Center”; 6 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://www.elveflow.com. |
Emulate, 6 Pages; (2019) https://emulatebio.com/. |
Endo et al., “Gene transfection to spheroid culture system on micropattemed culture plate by polyplex nanomicelle: a novel platform of genetically-modified cell transplantation”, Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res., 2012, vol. 2, p. 398-405. |
Engelberg et al, “Essential operating principles for tumor spheroid growth”, BMC Systems Biology 2008, 2:110, 19 pages. |
Evenou et al. “Spontaneous Formation of Highly Functional Three-Dimensional Multilayer from Human Hepatoma Hep G2 Cells Cultured on an Oxygen-Permeable Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane.” Tissue Engineering: Part C vol. 16, No. 2, 2010, pp. 311-318. (Year: 2010). |
Friedrich et al. “Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach.” Nature protocols, 2009, vol. 4 No. 3, 309-323. |
Fukuda et al, “Efficacy of a polyurethane foam/spheroid artificial liver by using human hepaloblastoma cell line (Hep G2)”, Cell Transplantation, 2003, 12:51-58. |
G-Plate: Accelerate your cell cultures to the next dimension, “An original cell culture model allowing for inland shaped 3D cell aggregates” 1 page, retrieved Sep. 8, 2015. |
GeoCHEM Incorporated, Product Line; hllps://www.geocheminc.com, 4 Pages; (2020). |
HμREL (Registered) Corporation, Bioanalytic Tools Company; 2 Pages; (2013); http://hurelcorp.com/. |
Haycock, “3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques”, Methods Mol Biol, 2011; 695:1-15. |
Hirschhaeuser et al., “Mulicellular tumor spheroids: An underestimated tool is catching up again.” Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 148, 3-15. |
Howes et al; “3-Dimensional Culture Systems for Anit-Cancer Compound Profiling and High-Throughput Screening Reveal Increases in EGFR Inhibitor-Mediated Cytotoxicity Compared to Monolayer Culture Systems”; PLOS One; Sep. 2004, vol. 9, Issue 9, 11 Pages. |
Hribar et al; “Nonlinear 3D Projection Printing of Concave Hydrogel Microstructures for Long-Term Multicellular Spheroid and Embryoid Body Culture”; Lab Chip, 2015, 15, 2412-2418. |
Hsiao et al., “Effects of 3D Microwell Culture on Initial Fate Specification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells”, Published in final edited form as AIChE J. vol. 60 No. 4, Apr. 2014, pp. 1225-1235. |
Huang et al., “Preparation of dense Ta—LLZO/MgO composite Li-ion solid electrolyte: Sintering, microstructure, performance and the role of MgO”, Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 39, 2019, pp. 8-16. |
Hwang et al; “Microwell-Mediated Control of Embryoid Body Size Regulates Embryonic Stem Cell Fate via Differential Expression of WNT5A and WNT11”; PNAS; Oct. 6, 2009, vol. 106, No. 40, pp. 16978-16983. |
Jeon et al, “Combined Effects of Flow-Induced Shear Stress and Micropatterned Surface Morphology on Neuronal Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells” J Biosci Bioeng, 2014, 117(2):242-247. |
Jiang et al, “Shear Enhances Thrombopoiesis and Formation of Microparticles That Induce Megakaryocytic Differentiation of Stem Cells”, Blood, Sep. 25, 2014; 124(13):2094-2103. |
Junji Fukuda et al., “Hepatocyte Spheroid Arrays Inside Microwells Connected With Microchannels”, Biomicrofluidics 5, 2011, pp. 10. |
Kelm et al, “Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2003; 83(2):173-180. |
Kim et al, “Shear Stress Induced by an Interstitial Level of Slow Flow Increases the Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Through Taz Activation” PLoS ONE, Mar. 21, 2014; 9(3), e92427, 9 pages. |
Koide et al, “Formation of multicellular spheroids composed of adult rat hepatocytes in dishes with positively charged surfaces and under other nonadherent environments”, Exp Cell Res 1990; 186:227-235. |
Koike et al. “Characterization of Embryo id Bodies of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Formed under Various Culture Conditions and Estimation of Differentiation Status of Such Bodies.” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering vol. I 04, No. 4, 294-299. 2007. (Year: 2007). |
Kunz-Schughart et al, “The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model”, J Biomol Screen 2004, 9(4):273-285. |
Kutsuzawa et al, “Highly Robust Protein Production by Co-Culture of CHO Spheroids Layered on Feeder Cells in Serum-Free Medium”; Colloid Polym Sci (2014) 292; 839-848. |
Labusca, “Scaffold free 3D culture of mesenchymal stem cells; implications for regenerative medicine”, J Transplant Stem Cel Biol 2015 2(1): 8. |
Landry et al, “Spheroidal aggregate culture of rat liver cells: histotypic reorganization, biomatrix deposition, and maintenance of functional activities” J Cell Biol 1985; 101:914-923. |
Lau et al., “Evaluation of a Novel in Vitro CAC0-2 Hepatocyte Hybrid System for Predicting In Vivo Oral Bioavailability” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 937-942, 2004. |
Lin et al., “La2Zr2O7 and MgO co-doped composite Li-Garnet solid electrolyte”, Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 40, 2020, pp. 132-136. |
Liquid Surge Control, LLC; “The Latest in Drop-In Baffle Technology”; 2 Pages; (2019). |
“Identification grid for microplates”, Rtreived from: https://www.kisker-biotech.com/frontoffice/product?produitId=0N-27-11, 2 pages, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220195366 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62069996 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15492730 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 17691511 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2015/058053 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15492730 | US |