It is known that an electrical field can be used to manipulate cells. Electrical manipulation of cells can be used for separating cells, holding cells, killing micro-organisms, or other operations.
Electrical manipulation of a cell is based on dielectrophoresis. A neutral particle, such as a microbial cell, will become polarized when subjected to a non-uniform electric field. Due to the non-uniformity of the field, a net force will act on the particle. This force will produce movement of the suspended cell. This phenomenon known as dielectrophoresis the inside of the cell has and holds a different charge than the outside of the cell.
Macro sized electroporation systems have been designed for injecting genes into cells. See “Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology,” E. Newman, A. E. Sauer, C. A. Jordan, ed. Plenum Press, New York, 1989. These systems often use electrical fields to make microsized pores on cell membranes.
Cell lysis typically refers to opening a cell membrane to allow the cell interior to come out. Cell lysing can be used to obtain intracellular material for further analysis such as DNA identification.
It is known to use the science of micromachining to manipulate cells. See, for example, S. Lee, “A Study of Fabrication and Applications of Micromachined Cell Manipulating Devices,” Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University, pp. 77–81, 1996. However, no one has previously reported using micromachining to form a device for cell lysis. Usually, these systems use cuvets that have a few millimeter range electrode gap. Lysing cells with this kind of size requires a few kilovolts of voltage source across such a gap.
Prior cell lysing has been reported using pulsed electric fields in a macrosized electroporation system. See, for example, T. Grahl and H. Markl, “Killing of Microorganisms by Pulsed Electric Fields,” Appl. Microbio. Biotechnol., 45, pp. 148–157, 1996. The disadvantages of such a macrosized device have been described above.
J. Cheng, et al, “Preparation and Hybridization analysis of DNA/RNA from E. Coli on Microfabriacted Bioelectronic Chips” has suggested electronic cell lysis on a chip. However, this system still required hundreds of volts for lysing the cell.
The present disclosure describes a new micromachined cell lysis device. A microsized cell lysis device as disclosed reduces the size of the entire system including the power source, since the electrode gap could be reduced to a few μm or smaller. This micro-sized cell lysis device is capable of operating on a small number of cells due to its small size.
A special way of using the electric field that can greatly simplify the purification steps is described. This can be used to prepare biosamples. In addition, the small size allows a reduction in voltage required for lysing. The voltage can be reduced to practical levels, e.g., less than 50 volts, since the electrode gap is on the order of microns.
A new structure is also described for cell lysis.
These and other advantages will now be described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The basic lysis device is shown in plan view in
The micromachining operates to form features on a silicon substrate.
First an insulator is formed on the silicon substrate, by oxidizing the silicon substrate 200 to form a thermally-grown 5000 Å silicon oxide layer 201 as shown in
A 4 μm thick layer of PARYLENE ™ type parax-ylylene layer is deposited and patterned to form Parylene barriers 210 as shown in
The preferred device is designed for yeast cells. The distance between electrodes is hence around 5 μm. More generally, the distance can range between about 0.8 μm and 100 μm (0.1 mm), more preferably on the order of e.g. 1–9.9 μm.
The final assembled device is shown in
Any arrangement of pairs of electrodes, such as interdigitated or parallel, can be used for the cell lysing. Preferably, the edges of the electrodes are made sharp as shown in order to concentrate the field better on the cells. The nearest distance 114 between the two electrodes is preferably equal to the mean diameter of a cell plus the standard deviation of the cells in order to obtain the most effective lysing.
An important feature includes how the device is operated. A power system for the cell lysis is formed as shown in
A multipurpose function generator 420 provides the electric fields which attracts the cells. The electric field is preferably a sinusoidal wave. A power MOSFET 422 provides the output to the cell lysis device 100.
A typical waveform is shown in
The attraction phase uses a 6 volt AC, 2 MHZ sample. This attracts the cells to the lysing locations. A sinusoidal wave is preferably used to attract the cell to the location. After a short delay, lysing pulse, a 100 μs, 20 volt pulse, is applied.
Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail above, other embodiments are contemplated by the inventor and are intended to be encompassed within the following claims. In addition, other modifications are contemplated and are also intended to be covered. For example, other shapes and sizes of electrodes could be used. There could also be more than two electrodes. While the pointed electrodes are preferred, flat shaped electrodes can also be used.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/954,684, filed Sep. 11, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,295 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/191,268, filed Nov. 12, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,831 which claims the benefit of the U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/065,705, filed on Nov. 14, 1997, which are incorporated herein by reference.
The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. N66001-96-C-8632 awarded by the U.S. Navy.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3926770 | Hoekje | Dec 1975 | A |
4778769 | Forrest et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4832814 | Root | May 1989 | A |
4908112 | Pace | Mar 1990 | A |
4971910 | Zimmermann | Nov 1990 | A |
4975175 | Karube et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4990236 | Sittler et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5137817 | Busta et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5389215 | Horiuchi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5491097 | Ribi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5593565 | Ajdari et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
6071394 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6287831 | Tai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6534295 | Tai et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030186430 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60065705 | Nov 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09954684 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10391993 | US | |
Parent | 09191268 | Nov 1998 | US |
Child | 09954684 | US |