The present invention relates to logistics equipment. Particularly, the invention relates to cell trays used for transporting a plurality of bottles.
Cell trays are a commonly known medium for transporting and temporarily storing bottles. The majority of bottles transported on cell trays are bottles with a circular cross-section. Cell trays have traditionally been designed to accommodate a bottle of certain standardized size such as 0.5 or 1.5 liter. This creates a problem for not only logistics and warehousing but also production planning at beverage producers, for example, as the demand for a certain bottle size fluctuates. Accordingly, great stocks of cell trays suitable for a certain size of bottle need to be maintained, which absorbs capital and increases warehousing costs.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a cell tray suitable for accommodating different sizes of bottles having circular cross-section. It is a particular aim to provide a cell tray suitable for accommodating circular cross-section having bottles of different proportions for adapting to diameter fluctuations of a given bottle volume between bottle standards in different market areas.
The object of the invention is achieved with a novel cell tray for transporting a plurality of bottles. The cell tray comprises a quadrilateral base which has on one side a loading surface adapted to receive bottle bottoms in a matrix-like loading pattern. The cell tray also comprises holding devices provided to the base on the opposite side to the loading surface such that the holding devices are adapted to receive and lock into place bottle mouths of bottles loaded onto a similar cell tray beneath said holding devices in a stack of cell trays. The holding devices are arranged as to align with at least two separate loading patterns on the loading surface. The first loading pattern is formed by a first plurality of holding devices which are arranged in a matrix-like formation which consists of a first number of rows and of a first number of columns. The second loading pattern is formed by a second plurality of holding devices which is arranged in a matrix-like formation which consists of a second number of rows and of a second number of columns. The second number of rows is at least one less than the first number of rows, and the second number of columns is at least one less than the first number of columns. On the other side of the base the loading surface comprises protruding ridges which have a shape inverse to that of a combination of the first loading pattern of bottle bottoms having a circular profile with a radius and second loading pattern of bottle bottoms having a circular profile with a radius larger than that in the first loading pattern.
Considerable benefits are gained with aid of the present invention.
Because the tray is equipped with different size recesses, bottles of different sizes may be accommodated, which enables the use of only one standardized cell tray for at least two different packages. In addition to obvious benefits in reducing the variety of load carriers in logistics and warehousing, the cell tray according to the invention helps in supplying products regardless of fluctuations in demand regarding bottle size and shape since one cell tray may be used to carry large and small bottles. Particularly the protruding ridges on the loading surface of the base are shaped in an inverse manner to the loading patterns, whereby the ridges guide bottle bottoms having a radius smaller than that of the bottles on the first loading pattern, whereby the cell tray is able to accommodate bottles of three different sizes. This is particularly advantageous in beverage production facilities with automated handling equipment, wherein one type of cell tray is applicable to 1.5 liter bottles, for example, having the cross-sectional diameter of 95 mm or 90 mm depending on bottle standards as well as to larger bottles of 2 or 3 liter, for example.
In the following certain embodiments of the invention are described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
a presents a bottom elevation view of the cell tray of
b presents the cell tray of
c presents the cell tray of
As can be seen from
As is also apparent from the figures, a plurality of subsequent secondary recesses 60 has been arranged to the same lateral edges 10, 20, 30, 40. Each secondary recess 60 is disposed between two subsequent primary recesses 50 such that the secondary recess 60 connects two subsequent primary recesses 50.
What is also noticeable is that the radius r60 of the secondary recess 60 is different to the radius r50 of the primary recess 50. Particularly, the radius r60 of the secondary recess 60 is larger than the radius r50 of the primary recess 50. As best seen in
When loaded, the bottoms of the bottles are supported laterally by the lateral edges, 10, 20, 30, 40 such that the outer envelope surface of the bottles engage with the recesses 50, 60. In the embodiment of
Bottles with different the bottom profile radius typically have same size corks and bottle mouths, whereby the holding devices 72 may be similar under bottle positions being formed by primary and secondary recesses 50, 60 alike. Due to the size difference between the bottles to be received and therefore to the radii r50, r60 of the recesses 50, 60, the holding devices 72 are spaced from each other such that there is ample space for providing lateral support structures for the bottle mouths. As can be seen from
In the illustrated examples, holding devices 72 are provided as locking sleeves which are known in the field per se. Alternatively, any suitable device known in the art for holding in place the mouth portion of a bottle is applicable, such as ribs arranged in a circle or a locking membrane with a center aperture. The shape of the holding devices 72 is therefore not be considered as limited to cylindrical but as any suitable shape for locking the top terminal end of the bottle.
Referring now back to the example given above, the first bottle profile A (Ø 95 mm) can be a typical 1.5 liter bottle and the second bottle profile B (Ø 113 mm) can be a typical 2 or 3 liter bottle. Thanks to the shape of the protruding ridges 73 and the cooperating arrangement of holding devices 72 on the opposite side of the cell tray 100, a third bottle profile has a diameter of 90 mm corresponding to an inner volume of 1.5 liter according to another standard may be loaded into the first loading pattern LP1 instead of the original 95 mm corresponding to the same volume. In fact, 1.5 liter bottles, for example, may are produced globally with slightly different cross-sectional diameters depending on market areas. It is therefore advantageous that the protruding ridges—while not tightly laterally supporting the smaller 90 mm diameter bottle—yet prevent the third profile bottles from dislocating and guide the bottle mouths into the correct holding devices 72 provided on a similar cell tray 100 above in a stack of cell trays. Thus, a bottle of a diameter smaller than that of the first profile A may be loaded into the first loading pattern LP1.
In another example (not shown) the diameter of the first bottle profile A corresponding to the primary recess 50 is 65 mm (0.33 to about 0.5 liter), which results in a matrix-like loading pattern of 54 bottle positions arranged in a six by nine matrix. In the same example, the diameter of the second bottle profile B corresponding to the secondary recess 60 is 95 mm (1.5 liter), which results in a matrix-like loading pattern of 24 bottle positions arranged in a four by six matrix. It is therefore to be noted, that the secondary recesses 60 need not connect two subsequent primary recesses 50. In fact in this embodiment, there are two fewer secondary recesses 60 than primary recesses 50 in the first and second lateral edge 10, 20 and three fewer secondary recesses 60 in the third and fourth lateral edge 30, 40. It is therefore to be concluded that the difference in the radii r50, r60 of the recesses 50, 60 and also of the bottle profiles A, B is to be selected according to the given bottle sizes such that the loading patterns match up. The dimensions of the lateral edges 10, 20, 30, 40 shall be selected accordingly.
Other arrangements are naturally also possible and considered to be obvious design alternatives for a skilled person now introduced to the novel cell tray concept according to the invention.
According to one embodiment shown in
The protruding ridges 73 comprise annular protrusions 73a on bottle positions in which the combination of the loading patterns LP1, LP2 permit. The annular protrusions 73a are shaped according to the base shape of the bottle helping the bottles to settle into position while being loaded into the loading pattern. Such annular protrusions 73a may result, e.g. from bottles with a pentalon shape.
In this context the term “comprise” is used to indicate inclusion instead of limitation, i.e. in addition to the stated elements, other elements may also be present. Furthermore, the above description is only to exemplify the invention and is not intended to limit the scope of protection defined by the claims. Indeed, it will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2012200699 | Feb 2012 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3982654 | Gottsegen | Sep 1976 | A |
5071026 | Apps | Dec 1991 | A |
5305884 | Apps et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5320245 | Apps et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5826712 | Aikio | Oct 1998 | A |
5842572 | Apps et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6279770 | Osbakk et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1006197 | Jun 1994 | BE |
295 00 197 | Aug 1995 | DE |
2 130 555 | Jun 1984 | GB |
WO 2011083207 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130199953 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |