Patent Grant
11516710
The present application is a National Phase entry of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2018/054135, filed Feb. 20, 2018, which claims priority from European Patent Application No. 17162851.4 filed Mar. 24, 2017, each of which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a cellular telecommunications network and a method of operating the same.
Cellular telecommunications networks typically comprise a plurality of base stations which each serve a plurality of User Equipment (UE). The plurality of base stations each have a coverage area (usually called a “cell”), within which a UE may connect to and receive telephony and data services from the base station. Cellular networking protocols also have defined processes for allowing a UE to disconnect from one base station and connect to another base station with minimal disruption to ongoing services. This is typically known as a handover.
There are several identifiers associated with UEs, such as the International Mobile Equipment Identifier (IMEI) and the International Mobile Subscriber Identifier (IMSI). The IMEI is a unique number used to identify the UE device and is typically stored within a non-removable memory module of the UE. The IMSI is a unique number used to identify the subscriber (i.e. the user), and is typically stored on a memory module of an integrated circuit card (such as a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card). In practice, a user subscribes to telephony and/or data services from a Mobile Network Operator (MNO) and this subscription is associated with an IMSI and a SIM card. The user may then receive these subscribed-for services through a UE by associating it with the IMSI (usually by connecting the SIM card to a SIM-card interface on the UE).
The concept of a multi-subscriber-UE has been introduced to provide improved services for consumers with high cellular networking demands. A multi-subscriber-UE is a single device that may be associated with a plurality of different subscriptions for cellular networking services. The multi-subscriber-UE may set up a connection to a base station for each subscription, and thereafter utilize all resources of these subscriptions through a single device. In other words, the multi-subscriber-UE may establish a first bearer for a first subscription, and a second bearer for a second subscription, and combine the resources of both the first and second bearers. Any application running on the multi-subscriber-UE may then use these combined resources via both the first and second bearers as if they are a single resource, such that the maximum data rate for that application is the sum of the data rate of the first bearer and the data rate of the second bearer. In this manner, the multi-subscriber-UE may realize much greater data rates than it would have access to if it were only associated with a single subscription.
The high-data rates of multi-subscriber-UEs can cause problems in the cellular telecommunications network. As several of the subscription-independent-bearers of the multi-subscriber-UE may be served by a single base station, and the data transmissions via these bearers occur contemporaneously as a combined resource, then the instantaneous demand on the serving base station can be significant. It is therefore more likely for a base station to become overloaded when serving such multi-subscriber-UEs when compared to serving a plurality of single-subscription UEs (which are less likely to utilize their resources at the same time).
It is therefore desirable to alleviate some or all of the above problems.
According to a first aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a method of operating a network node in a cellular telecommunications network, wherein the cellular telecommunications network further includes a first base station and a first User Equipment (UE) and the first UE is connected to the first base station by a first and second connection having resources associated with a first and second subscription respectively, the method comprising: determining that the first connection and second connection relate to the first and second subscription respectively; determining that the first connection and second connection relate to the first UE; monitoring a first resource usage of one or both of the first and second connections with the first UE; and initiating a handover of one or both of the first and second connections based on the first resource usage.
According to a second aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a device for a cellular telecommunications network, wherein the cellular telecommunications network further includes a first base station and first User Equipment (UE) wherein the first UE is connected to the first base station by a first and second connection having resources associated with a first and second subscription respectively, the device comprising: a processor adapted to: determine that the first connection and second connection relate to the first and second subscription respectively, determine that the first connection and second connection relate to the first UE; monitor a first resource usage of one or both of the first and second connections; and initiate a handover of one or both of the first and second connections based on the first resource usage. The device may be a base station.
Embodiments of the present disclosure therefore provide a technique to recognize when a resource usage of a plurality of subscription-independent connections between a multi-subscriber-UE and a base station satisfy a criterion for triggering a handover. In this manner, one or more of the plurality of subscription-independent connections may be subject to a handover to one or more other base stations, such that the impact of any contemporaneous sessions over these connections is mitigated.
The first resource usage may be the cumulative resource usage of the first and second connection between the first UE and the network node. In this manner, the effects of both connections may be taken into account when determining whether to hand over one or more of the connections to one or more other base stations.
Initiating the handover may be of both the first and second connections to a second base station, or may be of one of the first or second connections to a second base station, or may be of the first connection to a second base station and of the second connection to a third base station.
The method may further comprise (and the processor may be further adapted for) defining a connection group including the first and second connection, wherein the step of determining the first resource usage is of the connection group. Therefore, when such a connection group is identified, the first resource usage relating to the connection group may be monitored. The connection group may further include a third connection, the third connection relating to the first subscription and to the first UE. Accordingly, if the multi-subscriber-UE sets up several connections (the first and third) for the first subscription, and a second connection for the second subscription, then the resource usage of all these connections may be monitored and may all be part of any initiated handover.
The handover may indicate to the second base station that the first and second connections are associated with the UE. Embodiments of the disclosure provide a technique for a serving base station to indicate to a target base station (e.g. during the handover initiation process) that the plurality of connections relate to the same UE. Advantageously, this allows the target base station to skip any steps of recognizing that the plurality of connections relate to the same UE. The target base station may therefore immediately start monitoring a resource usage of the first and/or second connection, and initiate a handover if it satisfies a threshold.
The cellular telecommunications network may further include a second UE, and the second UE may be connected to the network node by a third and fourth connection having resources associated with a third and fourth subscription respectively, and the method may further comprise the steps of: monitoring a second resource usage of one or both of the third and fourth connections with the second UE; and initiating the handover of one or both of the first and second connections based on one or both of the first and second resource usage. Thus, if a base station serves several multi-subscriber-UEs, then a handover of one or both connections associated with one multi-subscriber-UE may be based on the resource usage of connections associated with several multi-sub scriber-UEs.
The cellular telecommunications network may further include a management node having a database indicating a partnership between a first and second network, and the method may further comprise detecting that one or both of the first and second connections relates to the first network; sending a message to the management node, the message identifying the first network; receiving a response message from the management node, the response message identifying the second network, wherein initiating the handover of one or both of the first and second connections is to the second network. Thus, if it is decided that one or both connections should be subject to a handover, then it may advantageously be made to a base station of a preferred roaming partner network (such that the multi-subscriber-UE is likely to receive preferential Quality of Service and billing rates).
According to a third aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of the first aspect of the disclosure. The computer program may be stored on a computer-readable data carrier.
In order that the present disclosure may be better understood, embodiments thereof will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
A first embodiment of a cellular telecommunications network 1 will now be described with
The second and third base stations 30, 40 are substantially the same as the first base station, and thus have corresponding first and second transceivers, processors and memories.
A first embodiment of a method of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the call flow diagram of
In S1, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 selects the first base station 20 following a cell selection procedure and establishes a Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection therewith. As part of the RRC connection setup process, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 sends an ‘Attach Request’ message to the first base station 20, which includes the IMSI of the first SIM card. In step S2, the first base station 20 allocates an ‘eNB UE S1AP ID’ to the UE, and sends an ‘Initial UE Message’ to the MME 50, which has the ‘Attach Request’ message (and thus the IMSI of the first SIM card) embedded within.
As noted above, the MME 50 includes a first database having an entry for each bearer for the first base station, together with that bearer's associated IMSI and IMEI. At this stage of the process, a new entry on the first database may be part-populated with the following information:
In S3, the MME 50 retrieves the IMEI from the multi-subscriber-UE 10 using ‘Identity Request’ and ‘Identity Response’ messages. The MME 50 then sends the retrieved IMEI to the EIR 110 in an ‘ME Identity Check Request’ message for authentication. Once authenticated, the EIR 110 responds with a ‘ME Identity Check Ack’ message. In this embodiment, the MME 50 then updates its first database, thus:
In S4, the multi-subscriber-UE 10, MME 50 and the HSS 70 cooperate to authenticate the multi-subscriber-UE 10 on the network. In S5, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 and MME 50 cooperate to establish Non-Access Stratum (NAS) security so that NAS messages can be securely exchanged between them.
In S6, the MME 50 sends an ‘Update Location Request’ message to the HSS 70 to register IMSI 1 with the HSS 70 and to discover what services IMSI 1 is subscribed to. In response, the HSS 70 registers IMSI 1 and responds with an ‘Update Location Answer’ message identifying the subscribed-to services (such as the Access Point Name (APN), PGW, Quality of Service (QoS) profile, etc. that the IMSI 1 may use). In this embodiment, the first MME 50 then updates its first database, thus:
In S7, the first MME 50 cooperates with the SGW 80, the PGW 90, and the PCRF 100 to establish an Evolved Packet System (EPS) session and a default bearer for IMSI 1, in which the default bearer is allocated the appropriate network and radio resources for providing the services identified by the HSS 70.
In S8, the first MME 50 determines whether there are any other bearers in its database which have a common IMEI, but a different IMSI. As the table only includes a single entry at this stage, this determination is negative. Accordingly, the first MME 50 sends an ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message to the first base station 20, which includes an EPS Radio Access Bearer (RAB) ID (which is equivalent to EPS Bearer 5 stored in the first MME 50 for the default bearer) together with information regarding its QoS. The ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message also includes an ‘Attach Accept’ message to be delivered by the first base station 20 to the multi-subscriber-UE 10, which is responsive to the ‘Attach Request’ message (from S1) and includes the IP address.
In this embodiment, the ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message from the first MME 50 to the first base station 20 also indicates whether the default bearer is part of a bearer group and the associated bearer group's threshold. However, as the determination at S8 was negative, this message indicates that the default bearer is not part of a bearer group. The purpose of this modification to the ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message will become clear upon review of corresponding description relating to the Network Attach procedure for IMSI 2. On receipt of this message, the first base station 20 populates its first database with a new entry for the EPS RAB:
In S9, the default bearer from the multi-subscriber-UE 10 to the PGW 90 for IMSI 1 is complete, allowing both downlink and uplink communication with the PGW 90.
Now a default bearer for IMSI 1 has been established, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 then performs the Network Attach procedure for the second IMSI. As the process is substantially the same (and any differences will be highlighted in the following description), the same reference numerals of
In S1, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 also selects the first base station 20 following a cell selection procedure and establishes a Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection therewith. As part of the RRC connection setup process, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 sends an ‘Attach Request’ message to the first base station 20, which includes the IMSI of the second SIM card (i.e. IMSI 2). In S2, the first base station 20 allocates an ‘eNB UE S1AP ID’ to the UE, and sends an ‘Initial UE Message’ to the MME 50, which has the ‘Attach Request’ message (and thus the IMSI of the second SIM card, IMSI 2) embedded within. On receipt of this message, the MME 50 updates its first database thus:
In S3, the first MME 50 retrieves the IMEI from the multi-subscriber-UE 10 using ‘Identity Request’ and ‘Identity Response’ messages and authenticates the IMEI with the EIR 110. Following this step, the first MME 50 updates its first database thus:
In S4 and S5, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 is authenticated on the network and NAS security is established. In S6, the first MME 50 sends an ‘Update Location Request’ message to the HSS 70 to register IMSI 2 with the HSS 70 and to discover what services IMSI 2 is subscribed to. In response, the HSS 70 registers IMSI 2 and responds with an ‘Update Location Answer’ message identifying the subscribed-to services (such as the Access Point Name (APN), PGW, Quality of Service (QoS) profile, etc. that the IMSI 2 may use). In this embodiment, the MME 50 then updates its first database, thus:
In S7, the first MME 50 establishes an Evolved Packet System (EPS) session and a default bearer for IMSI 2, in which the default bearer is allocated the appropriate network and radio resources for providing the services identified by the HSS 70.
In S8, the first MME 50 determines whether there are any other bearers in its database which have a common IMEI, but a different IMSI. As shown in Table 7, EPS Bearer IDs 5 and 6 have the same IMEI, but different IMSIs. This indicates that the bearers terminate in a common terminal (i.e. the multi-subscriber-UE 10) and can therefore be allocated to a bearer group. In this example, EPS Bearer IDs 5 and 6 are allocated to Bearer Group 1. Accordingly, the first MME 50 sends an ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message to the first base station 20, which includes an EPS Radio Access Bearer (RAB) ID (which is equivalent to EPS Bearer 6 stored in the first MME 50 for the default bearer) together with information regarding its QoS, together with a distinct IP address. This message also indicates that both EPS Bearer IDs 5 and 6 are part of Bearer Group 1, and Bearer Group 1 has corresponding threshold, D1max. In this embodiment, the threshold is the cumulative data rate of the bearer group.
On receipt of the ‘Initial Context Setup Request’ message, the first base station 20 updates its first database thus:
The first base station 20 also creates a new entry in its second database:
In S9, the default bearer from the multi-subscriber-UE 10 to the PGW 90 for IMSI 2 is complete, allowing both downlink and uplink communication with the PGW 90.
Following completion of the above process, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 has established default bearers for both the first and second IMSI, such that the resources of both bearers can be combined. This is achieved by the first base station 10 establishing a single logical interface for each bearer, based on their respective IP addresses. In this manner, any application running on the multi-subscriber-UE 10 (or any device connected thereto) may realize data rates which are the sum of the data rate permitted under the first subscription (associated with IMSI 1) and the data rate permitted under the second subscription (associated with IMSI 2).
Now these default bearers have been established and the databases of the first base station 20 and first MME 50 have been populated, then this embodiment of the disclosure continues with the following iterative process (as outlined in
In S10, the first base station 20 monitors the default bearers of Bearer Group 1 to determine their respective data rates. These data rates are then summed to determine the cumulative data rate for Bearer Group 1. In S11, this cumulative data rate is compared to the bearer group threshold, D1max. If the cumulative data rate is less than the threshold, then the process loops back to S10 (via a delay timer).
In this example, the cumulative data rate is greater than the threshold and the process moves to S12, in which the first base station 20 selects one or more other base stations (e.g. the second and/or third base stations 30, 40) as the target(s) of a handover of the bearers associated with the first and second IMSIs. This selection may be based on one or more of the reported Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) between the multi-subscriber-UE 10 and the second and third base stations 30, 40, and the load of the second and third base stations 30, 40 (which may be obtained over the respective X2 interfaces). In this example, the first base station 20 determines that both default bearers associated with the first and second IMSIs should handover to the second base station 30. Accordingly, in S13, the first base station 20 sends a message to the second base station 30 requesting a handover of the default bearers of both the first and second IMSIs, and receives a positive response. In S14, the first base station 20 instructs the multi-subscriber-UE 10 to handover both default bearers associated with the first and second IMSI to the second base station 30.
In this embodiment, the handover instruction messages identify that the first and second default bearers relate to a bearer group, and further identify the group threshold for that bearer group. Accordingly, the second base station 30 may recognize that these connections relate to the same UE and may immediately perform the monitoring of S10 to S14 (that is, without having to recognize these associations using S1 to S9). The second base station 30 may also update the bearer group threshold such that it is appropriate for its configuration and environment.
Once the handover is complete, the first base station 10 deletes the entries in its first and second databases relating to these default bearers, and the process then loops back to S10 (via the delay timer) for a subsequent iteration. Accordingly, if any further bearers are established on the first base station 20 for a multi-subscriber-UE, then these are monitored and a handover may be triggered if the appropriate threshold is satisfied.
In the above embodiment, the first base station 20 determines that all bearers associated with the multi-subscriber-UE 10 should hand over to the second base station 30. However, this is non-essential. In other implementations, a subset of the default bearers for the multi-subscriber-UE 10 may continue to be served by the first base station 20, whilst the remainder are subject of a handover. Furthermore, a handover of a plurality of default bearers may be to a plurality of other base stations.
The skilled person will also understand that it is non-essential for there to be only the default bearer for each IMSI. For example, further (i.e. dedicated) bearers may be established for the same IMSI but to an alternative PDN. In such a scenario, the MME 50 may store a database entry for each bearer identifying the IMSI, the IMEI and the PDN. However, as noted above in S8 of the above embodiment, the MME 50 determines that a bearer group exists if there are two bearers having the same IMEI but different IMSIs (regardless of their PDNs). In other words, the MME 50 does not determine that a bearer group exists if there are two bearers having the same IMEI and the same IMSI (but with different PDNs). However, it is advantageous for the MME 50 to record such dedicated bearers as the MME 50 may also associate them with a bearer group once it has been identified. For example, the first database of MME 50 may identify the following bearers:
In this scenario, the MME 50 would determine that a bearer group exists as EPS Bearer ID 5 and EPS Bearer IDs 6 or 7 are for the same IMEI but for different IMSIs. Thus, Bearer Group 1 may be created, which may include both EPS Bearer IDs 5 and 6. Further, as EPS Bearer ID 7 relates to the same IMEI, it may also be added to Bearer Group 1. This bearer may then be monitored and be part of the handover processing (of S10 to S14).
Furthermore, the skilled person will also understand that the decision to handover one or more of the bearers may be based on other factors than the cumulative data rate of all bearers. For example, it may be based on some other resource usage factor, such as the data rate of one or a subset of the bearers, an average data rate of all bearers, a usage percentage of the overall base station capacity, and/or the type of service being used by a bearer (e.g. if the bearer relates to a VoIP service).
The skilled person will also understand that base stations serve many UEs, and several of those UEs may be multi-subscriber-UEs. In a further example, therefore, the first base station may also serve a second bearer group (serving a third and fourth default bearer), and the decision to handover one or more of the bearers of the first bearer group may be based on the resource usage of the first and second bearer groups.
The above embodiments are based on a cellular network operating according to the LTE protocol. The skilled person will understand that the above procedures, in which bearers are established for each IMSI, are based on the techniques and terminology for that protocol. However, this is non-essential and the present invention may be realized in other protocols and by their corresponding processes for establishing and monitoring connections between UEs and the cellular networks. Thus, any radio access or cellular core networking components (regardless of protocol) capable of establishing a plurality of connections with one or more cellular networks on a single UE, wherein each connection is associated with a distinct subscription to a cellular network (thus having distinct resources), may realize the benefits of embodiments of the present disclosure by monitoring these plurality of connections and triggering a handover based on their resource usage.
The skilled person will also understand that in the particular method of establishing bearers in the LTE protocol detailed above, it is non-essential that the default bearers for each IMSI are established sequentially (that is, they may be established in parallel).
In the above embodiments, the base station directly monitors the plurality of connections of the multi-subscriber-UE and, if they satisfy a threshold, instructs a handover to another base station. However, the skilled person will understand that these activities may be performed in a separate network node, which may directly monitor the resource usage of one or more of the connections, compare it to a threshold, and initiate a handover.
A second embodiment of a method of the present disclosure will now be described, with reference to
As in the first embodiment, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 performs a Network Attach procedure for the first IMSI (for the first SIM card and its associated first subscription for a cellular networking service), followed by a Network Attach procedure for the second IMSI (for the second SIM card and its associated subscription for a cellular networking service). As shown in
As will be known to those skilled in the art, the first IMSI of the first SIM card includes its Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN). This is an identifier for the Network Operator providing the first subscription for the cellular networking service for the first SIM card (in other words, an identifier for that SIM card's “home” network). Furthermore, the ECGI of the first base station 20 includes its PLMN. This is an identifier for the Network Operator which operates that base station. In this embodiment, the PLMN of the first IMSI of the first SIM card of the multi-subscriber-UE 10 is the same as the PLMN of the ECGI of the first base station 20, such that the Network Attach procedure for the first IMSI of the first SIM card is to a base station of its home network.
The remaining activities (S3 to S9) of the first embodiment are also implemented in this embodiment, such that a default bearer is established between the multi-subscriber-UE 10 and the PGW 90a for the first IMSI, and the first MME's first database and the first base station's first and second databases are populated with information concerning the bearer, the first IMSI, the IMEI, the APN, and the bearer group. However, in this embodiment, the first MME's first database is further populated to indicate the network associated with the first IMSI and the network associated with the serving base station, as shown in the following example:
As noted above, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 also performs a Network Attach procedure for the second IMSI (for the second SIM card and its associated second subscription for a cellular networking service) using the same modified S1 and S2. However, in this example, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 selects the second base station 30 following its cell selection process for the second IMSI and therefore sends an ‘Attach Request’ message (including the second IMSI of the second SIM card) to the second base station 30. In S2, the second base station 30 sends an ‘Initial UE Message’ to the second MME 60, which includes the second IMSI of the second SIM card and its ECGI. In this embodiment, the PLMN of the second IMSI of the second SIM card of the multi-subscriber-UE 10 is different to the PLMN of the ECGI of the second base station 30, such that this Network Attach procedure for the second IMSI of the second SIM card is to a base station of a visited network.
Accordingly, the second MME's first database is populated with an entry relating to the second IMSI, thus:
The second MME 60 detects that this Network Attach request relates to an IMSI and SIM card of a different network (as the network operator associated with the PLMN ID within IMSI 2 for the second IMSI is different to the network operator associated with the second base station 30 and second MME 60). In response, the second MME 60 sends the information in its first database concerning the second IMSI to the first MME 50 via the S10 interface. On receipt of the information via the S10 interface, the first MME 50 updates its first database, thus:
The remaining activities (S3 to S9) of the first embodiment are also implemented in this embodiment, such that a default bearer is established between the multi-subscriber-UE 10 and the PGW 90b for the second IMSI. As part of these steps, the first MME 50 determines that a bearer group exists in its first database (i.e. a group of bearer paths which relate to different IMSIs but the same IMEI). In this example, EPS Bearer IDs 5 and 6 are allocated to Bearer Group 1.
According to the above process, the first MME 50 of the second embodiment of the present disclosure populates a first database indicating that the multi-subscriber-UE 10 has a bearer group having a first and second default bearer associated with a first and second subscription respectively. Furthermore, the first MME's first database indicates that the first and second default bearers of this bearer group are connected via base stations of different networks (as the PLMNs of the serving base stations of the first and second default bearers of the bearer group are different) and that the second connection is via a base station of a visited network (as the PLMN of the second base station is not the same as the PLMN of the second IMSI).
Following the above process, the first MME 50 is configured to perform the following iterative process (as outlined in
In S16, the first MME 50 consults the second database to identify a preferred roaming partner for the first network. In this example, the second database indicates that a third network (PLMN 3) is a preferred roaming partner network for the first network. In S17, the first MME 50 sends an instruction to the multi-subscriber-UE 10 (via the second MME 60 and second base station 30) to initiate a transfer of the default bearer for the second IMSI of the second SIM card to a base station of the third network. The multi-subscriber-UE 10 therefore initiates a cell reselection process in which it only considers base stations of the third network (i.e. those having PLMN 3).
The second embodiment therefore provides a method by which an MME may initiate a transfer of one or more default bearers of a bearer group when those default bearers are not via a base station of their home network. These transfers are to a base station that is part of the default bearer's home network's preferred roaming partner, such that it is more likely that the default bearer will receive improved Quality of Service and more favorable billing rates. Furthermore, the first MME 50's second database may be updated more frequently than any equivalent PLMN list used by the multi-subscriber-UE as part of its cell (re-)selection process, such that the second embodiment of the present disclosure provides an improved method for encouraging default bearers to be established via base stations of preferred networks.
In the second embodiment, the multi-subscriber-UE 10 establishes default bearers for a first and second IMSI that are both associated with the first network (such that the PLMN ID of the first and second IMSIs are the same). However, the skilled person will understand that it is non-essential that the first and second default bearers for the multi-subscriber-UE are associated with the same home network. That is, the first IMSI for the first SIM card may be associated with the first network (such that the first subscription for a cellular networking service is from the first network) and the second IMSI for the second SIM card may be associated with the second network (such that the second subscription for a cellular networking service is from the second network). In this scenario, the home networks of the first and second default bearers would be PLMN 1 and PLMN 2 respectively, and if these bearers were established through the first and second base stations (as in the above example), then the determination in S15 would be negative as the PLMN for the serving base stations for each default bearer is the same as the PLMN for the home network. However, if the default bearer for the first IMSI was via the second or third base stations, or the default bearer for the second IMSI was via the first or third base stations, then the determination in S15 would be positive and the relevant MME would initiate a transfer of the default bearer having a serving base station which is not via its home network.
Furthermore, the skilled person will understand that there are synergies between the first and second embodiments. That is, if the first base station 10 of the first embodiment determines, at S11, that the combined resource usage is greater than a threshold, then, at S12, it may select a target base station based on the first MME's second database. That is, it may send a message to the first MME requesting the identity of a preferred roaming partner network for the home network of one or both of the default bearers for the bearer group. Once the first base station receives a response from the first MME, it may initiate a handover of one or more of the default bearers to a base station of the preferred roaming partner network (e.g. by instructing the UE to perform a cell reselection process in which only base stations having the PLMN of the preferred roaming partner network are considered).
In the second embodiment detailed above, the default bearer of the second connection is established between the multi-subscriber-UE 10 and APN 2. However, it is non-essential that the default bearers of the first and second connections be made to distinct APNs. That is, if appropriate breakout rules are applied, the connections may be home routed to the same APN.
The skilled person will also understand that it is non-essential in the second embodiment that only the connection being made by the visited network is subject to the transfer. That is, it may be more appropriate to transfer more than one, or all, of the connections for the multi-subscriber-UE 10 to base stations of the preferred roaming partner network.
The skilled person will understand that any combination of features may be possible within the scope of the disclosure, as claimed.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17162851 | Mar 2017 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/054135 | 2/20/2018 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018/172003 | 9/27/2018 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8358624 | Ghaus et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 9210691 | Ponukumati et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9883436 | Brown | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 10123241 | Brown | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 20020187780 | Souissi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20050048972 | Dorenbosch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20070057843 | Chang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20080112364 | Kwon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293394 | Silver et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20100291924 | Antrim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110217979 | Nas | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110281582 | Jiang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120021744 | Chin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122515 | Han et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130148574 | Liu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223230 | Swaminathan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130237245 | Tinnakornsrisuphap et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267229 | Gopalakrishnan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303240 | Sanka | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140066069 | Salami et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114568 | Park | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140187243 | Rune et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140233449 | Laroia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140341184 | Dhanda et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140378129 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150038154 | Ponukumati et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097731 | Russell | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150126187 | Ponukumati et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150139015 | Kadous et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296364 | Peruru et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150334604 | Banks et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160021660 | Krishnamurthy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160029281 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095036 | Stojanovski et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160183281 | Yeh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160205605 | Krishnamurthy | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262200 | Su | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160295439 | Yang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170094628 | Miao | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170127217 | Miao | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170332301 | Horn | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170347298 | Brown | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180262922 | Fitch | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20190028983 | Mackenzie | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102387590 | Mar 2012 | CN |
| 102387590 | Mar 2012 | CN |
| 103166949 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 103460756 | Dec 2013 | CN |
| 104106274 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| 105101164 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105247908 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105340331 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105706501 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 106464611 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106465464 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 2434816 | Mar 2012 | EP |
| 2605555 | Jun 2013 | EP |
| 2857798 | Apr 2015 | EP |
| 2750444 | May 2015 | EP |
| 2991242 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 2559556 | Aug 2018 | GB |
| 2559731 | Aug 2018 | GB |
| 2560754 | Sep 2018 | GB |
| 2560899 | Oct 2018 | GB |
| 2993087 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2001209891 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 20100131025 | Dec 2010 | KR |
| WO-2009121833 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010133256 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011095687 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2014021761 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014130764 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015177601 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015180126 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO-2016095584 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO-2018145796 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018145797 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018172002 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018172003 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Chandra K., et al., “CogCell: Cognitive Interplay between 60 GHz Picocells and 2.4/5 GHz Hotspots in the 5G Era,” IEEE Communications Magazine, May 7, 2015, 14 pages. |
| Christodoulou C. G., et al., “Reconfigurable Antennas for Wireless and Space Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jul. 2012, vol. 100, No. 7, pp. 2250-2261. |
| Combined Search and Examination Report under Section 17 and 18(3) for Application No. 1702030.6, dated Jul. 7, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Corrected Search Report under Section 17 for Great Britain Application No. GB1702033.0, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Examination Report under section 18(3) for Application No. 1702030.6, dated May 3, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Great Britain Application No. 1704702.8, dated Oct. 22, 2019, 4 pages. . |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17155116.1, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17155118.7, dated Aug. 29, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Great Britain Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 & 18 (3) for Application No. GB1702033.0, dated Nov. 29, 2017, 1 page. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/082585, dated Aug. 22, 2019, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/082586, dated Aug. 22, 2019, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2018/054134, dated Oct. 3, 2019, 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/082585, dated Apr. 9, 2018, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/082586, dated Feb. 9, 2018, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2018/054135, dated Apr. 26, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Search Report under Section 17 for Great Britain Application No. GB1702033.0, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 1 page. |
| Search Report under Section 17 for Great Britain Application No. 1702030.6, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 1 page. |
| Tunon D., et al., “Adding Dimensions to Wireless Systems with Orientation-Aware Devices and Reconfigurable Antennas,” International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, Invited Position Papers, 2014, pp. 298-302. |
| Yang Z., et al., “Sensor-assisted Codebook-based Beamforming for Mobility Management in 60 GHz WLANs,” IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, 2015, pp. 333-341. |
| Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/487,744, filed Aug. 21, 2019, Inventor: Ramirez. |
| Application and Filing Receipt for U.S. Appl. No. 16/484,659, filed Aug. 8, 2019, Inventor: Mehran. |
| Application and Filing Receipt for U.S. Appl. No. 16/484,740, filed Aug. 8, 2019, Inventor: Mehran. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17162851.4, dated Sep. 5, 2017 (13 pgs). |
| Great Britain Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 & 18(3) for GB 1704694.7, dated Aug. 14, 2017 (2 pgs). |
| Great Britain Search Report Under Section 17 for Application No. GB1704694.7, dated Aug. 11, 2017 (2 pgs). |
| Great Britain Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Application No. GB 1704694.7, dated Jun. 5, 2019 (1 pg). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2018/054135, dated Apr. 26, 2018 (12 pgs). |
| Legg et al., “Load Balancing and Aggregation Algorithms for LTE dual connectivity,” 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), IEEE, May 15, 2016 (5 pgs). |
| Viprinet: Bonding LTE / 4 G via LTE routers—better than Load Balancing | LTE /4G (Jul. 1, 2019) Accessed at [https://www.viprinet.com/en/technology/combinable-media/lte-4g] (4 pgs). |
| 3GPP TS 23.122, Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Non-Access-Stratum (NAS) functions related to Mobile Station (MS) in idle mode, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. CT WG1, No. V12.9.0, Jun. 24, 2016, XP051295206, (Release 12), 1 page. |
| 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Radio interface protocol aspects (Release 7), Oct. 17, 2006, XP050909974, 1 page. |
| Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 & 18(3) for Great Britain Application No. 1704702.8, dated Aug. 14, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Examination Report Under Section 18(3) for Great Britain Application No. GB1704702.8, dated Jun. 17, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17162854.8, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 18 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2018/054135, dated Oct. 3, 2019, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2018/054134, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 23 pages. |
| Search Report Under Section 17 for Great Britain Application No. GB1704702.8, dated Aug. 10, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Lesslie R G., et al., “The Application of a Simple Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis Shell to Natural Resource Management Decision Making,” ResearchGate, Jan. 2008, 26 pages. |
| Office Action For Chinese Application No. 201880011588.7, dated Aug. 2, 2021, 21 pages. |
| Office Action For Chinese Application No. 201880019173.4, dated Sep. 1, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200236595 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
