This invention relates to exterior sheathing products which incorporate cementitious materials, and especially, fiber cement sheathing which is lighter and more resistant to cracking when fastened to the exterior walls of buildings.
Fiber cement has been used in the United States building materials industry since the 1980's. This material is used in residential and commercial construction applications as an alternative to wood for siding, roofing, backer board, trim and fascia applications. Fiber cement is fire and insect resistant, and is more durable. In fact, it was the fastest growing market segment in the exterior sheathing industry in the 1990's, and by 2005, this material is expected to gain up to 25 percent of the siding market.
Fiber cement is, technically, a composite of portland cement, aggregate (usually sand), and cellulose fibers. Cellulose fibers are added to cement to increase its toughness and crack-arresting ability. Fiber cement shingle and shake products are widely available from such sources as James Hardie, Inc. under the brand name Hardiplank® and CertainTeed Corporation under the brand name Weatherboards™. These products are produced by the Hatchek de-watering process, which results in a laminated flat sheet reinforced with a significant amount of cellulose fibers, usually about 30–35 percent by volume.
Fiber cement materials possess useful properties, but they were at one point in their history believed to be unsuitable for exterior use since they were susceptible to damage due to the effect of freeze-thaw cycles. See Harper et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,637,860. Freeze-thaw action can cause severe deterioration to fiber cement building products. The primary cause of damage is due to the hydraulic pressures that develop as water freezes and expands in tiny fissures and pores of cementitious materials. Once these forces exceed the strength of the material, cracking occurs. During subsequent thawing, the water then moves through the cracks, expanding them further, to cause more damage when freezing occurs again.
Harper et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,637,860, suggested that better freeze-thaw resistance could be achieved by autoclaving a cellulose fiber cement mixture with silica sand additions. These inventors also recognized that silica sand additions reduced the density of formed sheet materials to a level below that necessary to achieve sufficient strength and freeze-thaw resistance. Accordingly, the '860 patent suggested compressing the wet mixture in a press to reduce its thickness and increase its density prior to autoclaving. Such a process has been proven to be effective in increasing the interlaminar bond strength (“ILB”) of fiber cement boards when pressures approaching 30 bar are used. See Wierman et al., “The Effects of Pressure on Freeze-Thaw Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Cement Board” (September, 2002).
While improvements to the processing of fiber cement sheathing have been introduced, there have been some notable disadvantages associated with fiber cement products compared to vinyl siding products. Specifically, even with cellulose fiber reinforcement, fiber cement panels and trim boards are susceptible to cracking by nails and screws, especially along their edges. Moreover, fiber cement trim boards are far heaver than their vinyl counterparts, and can be difficult to handle.
Accordingly, there is a current need in the cementitious exterior sheathing industry for a lighter weight, more crack resistance, and therefore, more durable siding and trim panel.
The present invention provides, in a first embodiment, a cementitious exterior sheathing product, including a rigid support member having a wall-facing side and an exterior-facing side. The rigid support member also includes a pair of lateral sides, a pair of longitudinal ends, and at least one nail flange disposed along one of its lateral sides. Disposed on a portion of the exterior-facing side of the rigid support member is a cementitious layer which exhibits an aesthetic appearance.
The cementitious exterior sheathing products and fiber cement trim boards of this invention can be provided in reduced thicknesses, of about 0.31 in., for example, which would be significantly lighter, and easier to carry than the 1 inch thickness trim boards currently provided in the marketplace. By transferring the load to a rigid support member, the cementitious trim boards of this invention can be made as much as 50% lighter than currently available fiber cement trim boards. The rigid support members of this invention are preferably provided with fastener receiving holes so that they, and not the fiber cement material, absorb the stress of hammering.
The preferred rigid support members of this invention include resinous or metallic materials which act as a reinforcement to the cementitious layers. These materials, while rigid and possessing a greater flexural modulus than fiber cement, can, nevertheless, be pre-perforated, perforated by the fasteners used to hang the trim boards, or provided as a lath structure, to enable nail or screw fastening with minimal stress, as well as, provide mechanical locking or bonding between the cementitious material and the rigid support. Additionally, cement bond promoters, such as polyvinyl-acetate (“PVA”) and acrylic coatings, may be used to provide an adhesive bond between the cementitious layers and the rigid support members of this invention.
In a further embodiment of this invention, a fiber cement trim board is provided which includes an elongated rigid support member having a wall-facing side and an exterior-facing side, a pair of lateral side portions and a pair of longitudinal ends. The exterior-facing side of the rigid support member includes at least a first and a second exterior wall portion. Disposed along a first of the pair of lateral side portions of the rigid support member is a first nailing flange, and a fiber cement layer is disposed on a portion of the exterior-facing side of the rigid support member. The fiber cement layer exhibits an aesthetic appearance. In the preferred embodiment, the fiber cement layer is a corner trim board.
The accompanying drawings illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention, as well as other information pertinent to the disclosure, in which:
Cementitious exterior sheathing products, such as lap siding, shingles, panels, planks, vertical siding, soffit panels, fascia, corner post, column corners and trim boards, are provided by this invention. As used herein, “cementitious” refers to hydraulically settable materials, including a hydraulically settable binder, such as hydraulic cement, gypsum hemihydrate, and calcium oxide, and water to which components such as aggregates, fibers, dispersants and a rheology-modifying agents can be selectively added to modify the properties of the mixture. The term “fiber cement” refers to a cementitious composition including portland cement, cellulose fibers and sand.
With reference to the figures, and particularly
The corner trim board 100 can further include a second nailing flange 19, the first and second nailing flanges 18 and 19 having disposed therethrough a plurality of fastener receiving holes 32. The fastener receiving holes 32 are desirably elongated slots through the rigid support member 11, although with some sacrifices, fastener holes can also, or alternatively, be located through the cementitious layer 22. The corner trim board 100 further includes, in this embodiment, third and fourth exterior wall portions 26 and 28 connected to the first and second exterior wall portions 14 and 16 respectively. The first, second, third and fourth exterior wall portions 14, 16, 26 and 28 are desirably arranged such that the first and fourth wall portions 14 and 28 are substantially parallel and the second and third wall portions 16 and 26 are substantially parallel. More preferably, the first nailing flange 18 is also substantially parallel to the first wall portion 14 and a second nailing flange 19 is substantially parallel to the second exterior wall portion 16, in this embodiment.
Alternatively, the rigid support member can take the form of a rectangular enclosure having first and second pairs of generally parallel walls (14, 28 and 16, 26 respectively), and a longitudinal slotted opening 23.
The cementitious layer 22 is disposed at least over the exterior-facing side 10 of the rigid support member 11, preferably prior to pressing and autoclaving. A good mechanical bond can be provided between the rigid support member 11 and the cementitious layer 22 by perforating the rigid support layer with through-holes 33 which allow the wet cementitious material to bulge through the rigid support member 11, as shown in FIG. 1., and following setting, provide it with a mechanically locking engagement. A plurality of like through-holes can be uniformly distributed through the first and second exterior wall portions 14 and 16, for example. Alternatively, or additionally, a resinous cementitious bond promoter 30 can be applied to any surface of the rigid support member 11 intended to be in contact with the cementitious layer 22, such as the first and second exterior wall portions 14 and 16, to promote an adhesive bond with the cementitious layer 22. Cementitious bond promoters include PVA and acrylic formulations, such as the acrylic-based cement mortar modifier Rhoplex® E-330, available from Rohm & Haas Company, Philadelphia, Pa. Additionally, the through-holes 33 can be punched through metal sheet or plate so as to provide one or more extending prongs 21 which can further aid in the mechanical locking of the cementitious layer 22 to the rigid support member 11 by extending into the cementitious layer 22 prior to curing.
The preferred corner trim board 100 of this invention enables the use of thinner cementitious materials than those formerly suggested for corner trim applications. The corner trim board 100 of this invention can include, for example, an cementitious layer 22 which is approximately at least about 0.05 inches, preferably about 0.25–0.75 inches, and more preferably about 0.31–0.63 inches in thickness, as opposed to as much as one inch thick prior art constructions. Additionally, since the fastener receiving holes 32 are preferably located in the rigid support member 11, nailing can be accomplished without risking the development of cracks or over-stressed areas in the cementitious layer 22. The corner trim board 100 of this invention can be designed to save at least 10 percent of the weight, and as much as 50 percent of the weight, of conventional trim board constructions without sacrificing strength or durability. In fact, due to the mechanical and/or adhesive bonding between the rigid support member 11 and cementitious layer 22, and the potential for “re-bar”-like reinforcement of the cementitious layer 22, the present construction may be even stronger.
With regard to the process for manufacturing trim boards and sheathing products of this invention, reference is now made to
The Hatchek process 214 includes a dewatering station or vacuum box 207 for de-watering each layer 204 of cementitious material and an accumulator roll 205 for assembling the layers together into about a 0.25–0.75 inch, preferably about 0.31–0.63 inch (dry cured thickness), multi-layered sheet 206. The cementitious sheet 206 is roll formed at step 216 through one or more further nip rolls or belts, followed by a cutting step 218. In a preferred embodiment, the multi-layered sheet 206 is wet or shear cut at step 216 to provide a 5 ft. wide×12 ft. long sheet dimension. The cutting step 216 can be accomplished by a water jet or cutting knife 306 as shown in
At the layering step 220, which is diagrammatically illustrated in
The pressing and final de-watering of the product is accomplished at step 222, shown also in
The disclosed Hatchek process 214, can be modified to introduce an interlaminar bond strength (“ILB”) promoter through spray head 208. Such an ILB strength promoter could include, for example, a cement mortar modifier or adhesive, such as acrylic, or PVA, such as the aforementioned Rhoplex® E-330, for assisting in promoting better adhesion between the layers 204 of the multilayered sheet 206. Alternatively, or additionally, a rheological agent, such as “nano-sized” magnesium alumino silicate, can be sprayed onto the fiber cement layer prior to sheet formation at the accumulation roll 205, to encourage flow between the individual cementitious layers 204 to create better interlaminar bond strength. One rheology-modifying agent used to produce such an effect is the Acti-gel™ brand of activated magnesium alumino silicate available from Active Minerals Company LLC, Hunt Valley, Md. Such rheological agents and cement adhesive promoters can also be added to the slurry 203 in the tank 201, or during initial mixing of the slurry 203 ingredients, or through a combination of these techniques.
In connection with the corner trim board 100 of this invention, an alternate press operation 400 is shown in
Following the pressing and de-watering step 222, the stack 304 of formed boards, fiberglass molds 303 and support members 302 are pre-cured at step 224 in an oven for 12 hours at 140° F. and 100% humidity. The pre-curing step 224 provides the now formed cementitious boards with sufficient mechanical properties to be transferred. At this stage the cementitious product is about 15–20% cured. It is then subjected to a final autoclaving step 226 for 12 hours at 325° F. in a saturated steam environment. The autoclaving step 226 should be sufficient to substantially cure the cementitious product to about a 99.9% cure. Following the autoclaving step 226, the board is separated from the molds at step 228, and then sent to inventory for a week or two prior to the dry cutting step 230. Dry cutting is typically accomplished with a gang saw including about 10 blades which are capable of cutting multiple products or making multiple cuts in a single product. In this fashion, scallops, staggered edges and individual shapes can be cut into the cementitious material to provide an aesthetic appearance. Wet cutting with water jet is also suitable for this purpose.
Following the dry cutting step 230, the cementitious product is sealed and primed at step 232. A good PVA or acrylic latex primer coat followed by a tinted finish coat helps to provide the corner trim board 100 with years of weatherability.
While the steps enumerated in the flow diagram of
The following preferred materials have been selected for manufacturing the cementitious products of this invention.
In the preferred embodiment, the rigid support member 11 includes a rigid polymer resin, such as, rigid polyvinyl chloride (“pvc”), fiberglass-reinforced epoxy or polyester, or a metal plate, sheet or lath. Suitable metallic materials include anodized or polymer-coated aluminum or copper, brass, bronze, stainless steel, or galvanized steel, in plate, sheet or lath form. If aluminum is selected, it should be coated wherever it comes in contact with the cementitious material of this invention, since it is prone to attack by alkali compositions. Similarly, carbon steel selections should be coated or galvanized in order to prevent rusting, especially in the first and second nailing flanges 18 and 19. The metal plate or lath can be roll formed and punched in order to provide through-holes 33 and fastener receiving holes 32. If a lath, scrim, or mesh construction is used, separate holes may not be necessary since the open construction of a lath, scrim, or mesh is ideal for mechanically locking with the cementitious layer 22 and is easily penetrated by fasteners such as nails and screws. With lath or scrim constructions, embedding within the cementitious layer 22 is an option, in which case, the rigid support member may contain corrugations, grooves perforations or ridges to assist in mechanically locking with the cementitious layer 22.
Aggregates 25, fibers 24, dispersants, and a rheology-modifying agents can be selectively added to modify the properties of the cementitious layer 22. The cementitious layer 22 most preferably includes a known fiber cement composition including wood fiber, silica sand and portland cement, with or without an acrylic modifier. A variety of additives can be included within the cementitious layer 22, such as organic binders, dispersants, one or more aggregate materials 25, fibers 24, air entraining agents, blowing agents, or reactive metals. The identity and quantity of any additive will depend on the desired properties or performance criteria of both the cementitious layer 22 as well as the sheathing or trim product made therefrom.
Organic binders are simply polymers that when added to water under certain conditions form long chains that intertwine and capture the components of the mixture. As water is removed from the mixture, these long chains solidify and bind the structural matrix. Because of the nature of these organic binders, however, they also function to modify the rheology of a composition. Whether the organic material is a binder, or primarily affects the rheology is a matter of degree and is dependent on the concentration. In smaller amounts the organic material primarily affects the rheology. As the amount of organic material is increased, its ability to bind the particles together increases, although it also continues to affect the rheology.
Organic binders can also be added to increase the cohesive strength, “plastic-like” behavior, and the ability of the mixture to retain its shape when molded or extruded. They act as thickeners and increase the yield stress of the inorganically filled mixture, which is the amount of force necessary to deform the mixture. This creates high “green strength” in the molded or extruded product. Suitable organic binders include a variety of cellulose-, starch-, and protein-based materials (which are generally highly polar), all of which assist in bridging the individual particles together.
Dispersants, on the other hand, act to decrease the viscosity and the yield stress of the mixture by dispersing the individual aggregates 25, fibers 24, and binding particles. This allows for the use of less water while maintaining adequate levels of workability. Suitable dispersants include any material which can be absorbed onto the surface of the binder particles or aggregates and which act to disperse the particles, usually by creating a charged area on the particle surface or in the near colloid double layer. The binders and dispersants can be introduced in the dry mixing step 210, slurry forming step 212 and/or sprayed between layers 204 by a spray head 208 onto the accumulator roll 202, for example.
It may be preferable to include one or more aggregate materials within the cementitious layer 22 in order to add bulk and decrease the cost of the mixture. Aggregates often impart significant strength properties and improve workability. An example of one such aggregate is ordinary silica sand or clay, which are completely environmentally safe, extremely inexpensive, and essentially inexhaustible.
In other cases, lightweight aggregates can be added to yield a lighter, and often more insulating, final product. Examples of lightweight aggregates are perlite, vermiculite, hollow glass spheres, aerogel, xerogel, pumice, and other lightweight rocklike materials. These aggregates are likewise environmentally neutral and relatively inexpensive.
Fibers may be added to the cementitious layer 22 in order to increase the interlaminar bond strength, compressive, tensile, flexural, and cohesive strengths of the wet material as well as the hardened articles made therefrom. Fiber should preferably have high tear and burst strengths (i.e., high tensile strength), examples of which include waste paper pulp, abaca, southern pine, hardwood, flax, bagasse (sugar cane fiber), cotton, and hemp. Fibers with a high aspect ratio of about 10 or greater work best in imparting strength and toughness to the moldable material.
From the foregoing, it can be realized that this invention provides reinforced cementitious sheathing products which are lighter in weight and more resistant to cracking than currently available commercial fiber cement products. The preferred corner trim board of this invention can use less than half of the cementitious material of a conventional trim board, but since it is reinforced with a rigid support member, it will be easier to work with and provide potentially greater durability. The cementitious layers of this invention can be joined to the rigid support member with mechanical and/or adhesive bonds, and the individual layers of the cementitious products of this invention can be further reinforced with Theological modifying agents to increase ILB strength by allowing fibers to displace and flow better across the laminated boundaries of the cementitious materials, or by adding mortar or cement bonding agents for adhesively bonding these layers together, or both. Although various embodiments have been illustrated, this is for the purpose of describing, and not limiting the invention. Various modifications, which will become apparent to one skilled in the art, are within the scope of this invention described in the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1447567 | Overbury | Mar 1923 | A |
1495070 | Finley | May 1924 | A |
1732403 | Harris et al. | Oct 1929 | A |
1787163 | New | Dec 1930 | A |
1872185 | Reade | Aug 1932 | A |
1959960 | Magrath | May 1934 | A |
2089005 | Sherman et al. | Aug 1937 | A |
2142181 | Croce | Jan 1939 | A |
2149741 | Miles | Mar 1939 | A |
2171010 | Schuetz et al. | Aug 1939 | A |
2174098 | Stein | Sep 1939 | A |
2187203 | Johnston | Jan 1940 | A |
2199760 | Schuetz | May 1940 | A |
2206042 | Novak | Jul 1940 | A |
2238017 | Duncan | Apr 1941 | A |
2560521 | Camp et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
2633441 | Guttress | Mar 1953 | A |
2954302 | Gorman, Jr. | Sep 1960 | A |
3185297 | Rutledge | May 1965 | A |
3284980 | Dinkel | Nov 1966 | A |
3289371 | Pearson et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3391037 | McNulty | Jul 1968 | A |
3607486 | Jacks et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3608261 | French et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3742668 | Oliver | Jul 1973 | A |
3766003 | Schuller et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3830687 | Re et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3868300 | Wheeler | Feb 1975 | A |
3927501 | Allen et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3929947 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3935021 | Greve et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3941632 | Swedenberg et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3944698 | Dierks et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3947398 | Williams | Mar 1976 | A |
3993822 | Knauf et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4015391 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4020237 | Von Hazmburg | Apr 1977 | A |
4040851 | Ziegler | Aug 1977 | A |
4047355 | Knorr | Sep 1977 | A |
4065333 | Lawlis et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4065597 | Gillespie | Dec 1977 | A |
4073997 | Richards et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4112174 | Hannes et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4128699 | Kole et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4135029 | Pfeffer | Jan 1979 | A |
4148781 | Narukawa et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4181767 | Steinau | Jan 1980 | A |
4187130 | Kautz | Feb 1980 | A |
4195110 | Dierks et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4203788 | Clear | May 1980 | A |
4242406 | El Bouhnini et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4263365 | Burgess et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4265979 | Baehr et al. | May 1981 | A |
4277526 | Jackson | Jul 1981 | A |
4288959 | Murdock | Sep 1981 | A |
4296169 | Shannon | Oct 1981 | A |
4303722 | Pilgrim | Dec 1981 | A |
4324082 | Rutkowski et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4335177 | Takeuchi | Jun 1982 | A |
4344804 | Bijen et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4344910 | Bijen | Aug 1982 | A |
4351867 | Mulvey et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4361616 | Bomers | Nov 1982 | A |
4363666 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4364212 | Pearson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366197 | Hanlon et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4378405 | Pilgrim | Mar 1983 | A |
4403006 | Bruce et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428775 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4437274 | Slocum et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4468909 | Eaton | Sep 1984 | A |
4477300 | Pilgrim | Oct 1984 | A |
4504533 | Altenhofer et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4506060 | White, Sr. et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4543159 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4571356 | White, Sr. et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4637860 | Harper et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4647496 | Lehnert et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4664707 | Wilson et al. | May 1987 | A |
4681802 | Gaa et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4722866 | Wilson et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4810569 | Lehnert et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4810576 | Gaa et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4811538 | Lehnert et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5148645 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5220762 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5319900 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342680 | Randall | Aug 1994 | A |
5371989 | Lehnert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397631 | Green et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401588 | Garvey et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5433048 | Strasser | Jul 1995 | A |
5439518 | Francis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5501056 | Hannah et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5601888 | Fowler | Feb 1997 | A |
5614307 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5644880 | Lehnert et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5704179 | Lehnert et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718785 | Randall | Feb 1998 | A |
5772846 | Jaffee | Jun 1998 | A |
5791109 | Lehnert et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799446 | Tamlyn | Sep 1998 | A |
5830548 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5881502 | Tamlyn | Mar 1999 | A |
5897108 | Gordon et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906364 | Thompson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5945182 | Fowler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960598 | Tamlyn | Oct 1999 | A |
5981406 | Randall | Nov 1999 | A |
5993303 | Fladgard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018924 | Tamlyn | Feb 2000 | A |
6029966 | Hertz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6258190 | Sciarrino et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276107 | Waggoner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293534 | Leban | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341458 | Burt | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346146 | Duselis et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354049 | Bennett | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358585 | Wolff | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367222 | Timbrel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6506248 | Duselis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510667 | Cottier et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6625950 | Shreiner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6684597 | Butcher | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6705052 | Larson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
721719 | Nov 1965 | CA |
794590 | Sep 1968 | CA |
993779 | Jul 1976 | CA |
1 033 133 | Jun 1955 | DE |
1 509 853 | Apr 1963 | DE |
1 223 287 | Aug 1965 | DE |
28 08 723 | Mar 1979 | DE |
0 148 760 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0 148 761 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0973699 | Jun 2003 | EP |
0943040 | Dec 2003 | EP |
772 581 | Apr 1957 | GB |
1 204 541 | Sep 1970 | GB |
1 520 241 | Sep 1978 | GB |
2 004 807 | Apr 1979 | GB |
2 103 563 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2141484 | May 1990 | JP |
3208871 | Sep 1991 | JP |
03337538 | Nov 1991 | JP |
04189937 | Jun 1992 | JP |
04189938 | Jun 1992 | JP |
5147997 | Jun 1993 | JP |
6001679 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6008219 | Jan 1994 | JP |
7187748 | Jul 1995 | JP |
WO 9816697 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9845222 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9957392 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0021901 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0061519 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0116048 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0142164 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0225034 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0231287 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02070247 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02070248 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02070425 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2004018090 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040118076 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |