1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a center feed system for use with a coking operation, which may be utilized to dispense residual by-product, steam and or quench fluid into a vessel, such as petroleum feed stocks into a coke drum.
2. Background of the Invention and Related Art
In the hydrocarbon processing industry, many refineries recover valuable products from the heavy residual oil that remains after refining operations are completed. This recovery process is known as delayed coking. Delayed coking produces valuable distillates, leaving coke as a by-product in large vessels or coke drums. The process of delayed coking involves directing a flow of residual byproduct through an inlet from a feed source into the vessel referred to as a coke drum.
The general trend in the delayed coking industry is towards increased safety, durability, efficiency, and reliability. Prior art designs for directing the flow of heated residual byproduct through an inlet from a feed source into a coke drum do not function to meet such goals. Utilizing a dispensing system that allows control over the dispensing, dispersion and flow patterns of residual byproducts, steam and quench fluid into a reservoir vessel may be desirable. As such, there is a need to improve how material and fluid including residual byproducts are injected into the large coke drums.
In accordance with the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention features a center feed injection system for use within a delayed coking system, or other similar system. Some embodiments of the center feed injection system comprise a spool coupled to a coke drum and a center feed injection system for depositing residual byproduct into the coke drum through an opening in the spool. In some embodiments, the center feed system comprises an injection nozzle, for introducing feed stock into a coke drum. In some embodiments, the center feed system comprises a retractable injection nozzle, which may be extended inwardly through an opening in the spool and/or a vessel for introducing a solid, liquid and/or gas including but not limited to feed stock, steam and quench fluids into a coke drum. Some embodiments may comprise an inlet sleeve in slidable engagement with a retractable injection nozzle. In some embodiments, a retractable nozzle may be retracted into an inlet sleeve out of the main body of the coke drum and/or a spool when not in use.
In some embodiments, the center feed system further comprises a pipe segment removable attached to the inlet of a spool, to facilitate controlled dispensing or dispersion of the residual byproduct into the reservoir vessel during a manufacturing process.
In some embodiments, the center feed system may further comprises pipe segments attached to the inlet spool structured to allow control over the thermal gradients within the center feed system itself.
Additionally, embodiments of the present invention may feature methods of dispensing residual byproduct into a reservoir vessel via one or more injection nozzles.
In order that the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the invention are obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
a and 9b illustrate a perspective view of a retractable injection nozzle according to one embodiment;
a and 10b illustrate a perspective view of a retractable injection nozzle according to an embodiment; and
a and 11b illustrate a perspective view of retractable injection nozzles according to embodiments of the present invention.
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the system and method of the present invention, and represented in
The present invention relates to methods and systems for dispensing residual byproducts into a reservoir vessel. Preferred embodiments relate particularly to dispensing petroleum byproducts into a coke drum as part of a delayed coking process. Various considerations affect the design of dispensing systems and methods. For example, utilizing a dispensing system that allows control over the flow patterns of residual byproducts into a reservoir vessel may be desirable. Examples of dispensing systems are illustrated throughout the figures.
While the simplicity of the system depicted in
Uneven heat distribution, or thermal variance, existing within vessel 2 as a result of the influx of the residual byproduct in the manner described above induces uneven stress distribution within vessel 2, lower flange 5, and the corresponding flanged member coupled to vessel 2, the bolts coupling the two together and the attendant valve.
Further, the delayed coking process typically utilizes at least two vessels. While one vessel is being filled the other is being purged of material and prepped to receive another batch of byproduct. During the off-cycle when a vessel is being purged of its contents, it is cooled by water and returned to a state of equilibrium. This cyclical pattern of dispensing hot residual byproduct into vessel 2 and subsequently hydroblasting the byproduct contributes to the thermal differential and stress within vessel 2. Cyclical loading and unloading or stressing and unstressing of vessel 2 is referred to as thermal cycling. In addition to other factors, thermal cycling typically results in the weakening or fatiguing of vessel 2 and its component parts, which leads to a reduction in the useful life of vessel 2.
In addition to thermal variance within the vessel and injection systems, control over the flow of heated residual byproduct into the vessel may be desirable for myriad reasons. As another example, coke bed morphology may be influenced by various factors including flow channeling and quench characteristics. Flow channeling is a complex process that occurs when residual byproduct is injected into the bottom of a coke drum. For example, as the vessel begins to fill, the weight of residual byproduct pressing down may begin to influence flow channeling patterns of residual byproduct being injected into the vessel as it is ejected from an inlet. Differing flow channel patterns affect the coking process. The relationship between flow channel patterns and the coking process is complex. For example, flow channeling affects not only the introduction of residual byproduct into a coking vessel, but the introduction of steam in subsequent processes and the flow of quench fluid utilized to cool the coke bed. Even or uneven flow channeling may result in different quench characteristics.
Accordingly, the complicated process that produces a particular flow channeling pattern, for example uneven flow channeling or even flow channeling may have an attendant effect on thermal variance in the coke drum as it is being filled, the movement of steam through a coke bed injected into the coke bed to crack off volatile organic compounds and may result in altered quench characteristics including but not limited to the amount of water required to cool the coke bed and the path that quench fluid follows through the coke bed during the quench cycle. For example, uneven flow channeling resulting may result in uneven quench characteristics that may alter thermal variances in the coking vessel effectively decreasing the life span of a coke vessel.
As another example, uneven flow channeling may result in quench characteristics that cool portions of the drum and coke bed dramatically, while leaving areas of the coke bed that are not cooled sufficiently prior to being cut from the drum. Explosions of hot gas, liquid and particulate matter may occur as a cutting tool is lowered through the coke bed and the heated areas of the coke bed are encountered. These explosions can be dangerous.
Center feed system 10 may comprise an inlet sleeve 58 that functions to deliver residual byproduct to a retractable injection nozzle 14. Inlet sleeve 58 may comprise a flanged component 60, allowing the inlet sleeve 58 to couple to a feed line 112. When attached to a feed line 112, a residual byproduct, such as petroleum byproducts used in the manufacture of coke, may enter the center feed system 10.
In some embodiments, the retractable injection nozzle 14, when in an open position, as shown in
In some embodiments, the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be modified to adjust flow characteristics. In some embodiments, the straight portion 19 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be manufactured with pipe that has the same inside diameter as a curved pipe segment 62 of the inlet sleeve 58. Alternatively, the straight portion 19 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be manufactured with pipe that has a larger or smaller inside diameter as a curved pipe segment 62 of the inlet sleeve 58. In some embodiments, the straight portion 19 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 is coped precisely to fit the ellipse of a curved pipe segment 62. The shape of the injection nozzle 14 may also be shaped to be a seamless continuation of the contour of the curved pipe segment 62 when it is aligned in an open position to allow residual byproducts to flow into the vessel. In other embodiments, the outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be constructed in various shapes and sizes. In some embodiments, the outlet 81 comprises an elliptical shape and has a diameter at least as large as the cross sectional diameter of the interior cavity 88 of the retractable injection nozzle 14, such that the outlet 81 allows for an even flow of residual byproduct into the spool 20 and vessel without increasing resistance to the flow of byproduct through the center feed system 10.
The inlet sleeve 58 may comprise a flanged surface 60 proximate to, and being utilized to connect the inlet sleeve 58 to, a feed line 112 and may further comprise a second flanged surface 61 for connecting the inlet sleeve 58 to the flanged inlet 6 of a spool 20. In some embodiments, the inlet sleeve 58 is designed to hold and be slidably connected to a retractable injection nozzle 14 allowing the injection nozzle 14 to move from an open position, as illustrated in
Inlet sleeve 58 may function to receive the residual byproduct from the feed 112 and extends from flange 60 as shown. In some embodiments, inlet sleeve 58 may integrally form with a curved pipe segment 62 that is shown in
In some embodiments, each of the feed line, inlet 58, shaped pipe segment 62 and retractable injection nozzle 14 are in fluid connection with one another when the retractable injection nozzle 14 is in an open position. When the injection system 10 is in an open position, residual byproduct may be allowed to travel through and ultimately be deposited within spool 20 and an attached coke drum. Steam, water or other fluids may also be allowed to travel through the center feed injections during various phases of the delayed cooking process.
However, when the retractable injection nozzle 14 is in a retracted position as illustrated in
Alternative structural configurations may be utilized for the inlet sleeve 58. Some examples of alternative structural configurations are shown in
As previously mentioned, the modification of the structural shape of the inlet sleeve 58, may be accomplished to provide for adjusted flow characteristics and/or to ameliorate problems associated with the influx of residual by product, steam and/or quench fluid into a coking vessel. For example, thermal variances, uneven flow channeling, uneven quench characteristics and other issues experienced may be rectified. Additionally, thermal variance in the center feed system itself may be controlled, while allowing molten hydrocarbon feed stock to flow through the center feed system 10.
Regulating thermal gradients within the center feed system 10 itself reduces attendant wear of parts associate with the center feed system 10. For example, further some embodiments of the center feed system 10 may be structured to utilize a pipe system in configurations designed to control flow of resid, steam and/or quench materials through the feed system 10. Accordingly, while a four way pipe segment is depicted in
Center feed system 10 may be constructed from scheduled pipe or cast material to withstand and deliver the high temperature, high pressure residual byproduct as intended. Other sizes and materials may be used depending upon the particular end use, and as system requirements dictate. Indeed, although particularly suited to be used within a delayed coking process, the present invention may be utilized in other areas of manufacture, each requiring construction from different materials.
With reference to
In some embodiments the control over the injection site and flow of residual by product, steam and/or quench fluid being introduced into the interior of the spool and/or vessel may be controlled. For example, the angle of introduction relative to the spool may be controlled. As another example, as residual byproduct enters the interior 30 of the spool 20 and/or vessel, it does so near the center of the spool 20 in a direction preferably comprising a vertical component. In other embodiments, residual byproduct enters the interior 30 the spool 20 from a position other than center of the spool 20, including near the interior surface 30 of the spool itself. As another example, as dictated by the desired flow channeling of a particular system, the center feed system 10 may be utilized to inject by product, steam and/or quench fluid into the spool and/or vessel comprising a vertical directional component or any other desired angle.
Control over the injection site and angle of injection may be desirable. For example, the feed into the center of the interior 30 of the spool 20 may be utilized to ensure that the spool and the sidewalls of a coking vessel are exposed to a consistent flow of byproduct. As another example, the controlled flow of molten residual byproduct from the injection nozzle 14 may ensure that the exposure to molten residual byproduct is consistent across the entire surface area of the interior of the spool 20 and vessel, reducing the potential detrimental effects associated with repetitive thermal cycling. As another example controlled flow of molten residual byproduct from the injection nozzle 14 may ensure control over flow channeling patterns. As another example, quench characteristics and stripping volatile organic compounds from the coke bed may be controlled. Additionally, concerns associated with hot spots in a coke bed may be ameliorated.
With reference to
With reference to
The outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle may comprise various configurations.
Additionally, the outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be fitted with a flow control device. In some embodiments, a flow control device comprising a series of holes or perforations at the outlet 81 may be utilized to alter the flow of molten resid from the outlet. For example, a flow control device could be utilized to modify the laminar nature of the flow of the molten resid from the outlet. Similarly, flow control devices may be used at various points in the center feed system 10 to alter the flow of molten resid through the center feed system 10. For example, one or more flow control device(s) may be utilized to modify the laminar nature of the flow of resid, steam and/or quench fluid through the system, or to alter the nature of flow through the center feed system 10 in a desirable fashion.
In some embodiments residual byproduct exits the outlet 81 which has been structurally modified to accomplish control of flow of residual byproduct through the center feed system and into a coking vessel. In some embodiments residual byproduct exits the injection nozzle 14 in a direction that comprises a vertical component. In some embodiments, residual byproduct exits the outlet 81 at roughly a 90° angle relative to the entrance point on a side wall 22. As such the residual byproduct is not directed towards the opposite side of the vessel or spool 20. Alternatively, injection system 10 may be designed to introduce molten resid, steam and/or quench fluid into the vessel at about a 85°, 80°, 75°, 70°, 60°, 55°, 50°, 45°, 40°, or 35° angle relative to the entrance point on a side wall 22. Alternatively, injection system 10 may be designed to introduce molten resid steam and/or quench fluid into the vessel at about a 95°, 100°, 105°, 110°, 115°, 120°, 125°, 130°, 135°, 140° or 145° angle relative to the entrance point on a side wall 22.
In some embodiments, the particular angle of curved segment of interior cavity 82 and length of retractable injection nozzle 14 may vary depending upon system requirements and the size and dimensions of the vessels in which the material is being deposited. In a preferred embodiment, curved segment of interior cavity 82 comprises an angle between 0 and 90° to correspond to the range of angle desired within a particular coking vessel. In some embodiments, the curved segment of interior cavity 82 lies between 60 and 90°, effectively producing a vertical or nearly vertical spray of residual byproduct, steam and/or quench fluid exiting outlet 81, filling spool 20 and vessel in a desired fashion. Alternatively, embodiments may utilize a curved segment of the interior cavity 82 with between 30 and 60° angle relative to the point of entry inside the spool 20 producing a substantially vertical spray of residual byproduct into the spool 20 and coking vessel.
In some embodiments, a shorter retractable injection nozzle 14 may be used. Further the shorter retractable injection nozzle 14 may be utilized in conjunction with a curved segment of an interior cavity 82, such that the shortened length of the retractable injection nozzle is coupled with a curved segment of the interior cavity 82 with an angle designed to spray residual byproduct into the desired point in the interior of the coke drum. Alternatively, some embodiments utilize a longer retractable injection nozzle 14 placing the outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 directly in the center of the spool 20 or even extending beyond the center of the spool 20. The longer retractable injection nozzle may be utilized in coordination with a more vertical curve in the curved segment of the interior cavity 82, such that the residual byproduct would be delivered directly at or near the center of the vessel and spool 20, or to the desired spot within the interior of the spool 20 to control the flow of residual by product, steam and/or quench fluid into the spool 20 and/or vessel.
Further, some embodiments alter both the angle of the curved segment of the interior cavity 82 as well as the length of the straight section 19 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 to accommodate viscosity, velocities and temperature gradients of residual byproduct being pumped to the retractable injection nozzle 14.
Insert sleeve 58 and retractable injection nozzle 14 may comprises a uniform cross sectional area and/or interior diameter, or may comprise varying cross sectional areas or diameters. Designing the center feed system 10 to comprise varying cross sectional areas or diameters allows the center feed system 10 to provide for, and accommodate, varying volumes and velocities of residual byproducts, steam and/or quench fluid to be transported through the system, as well as to help control the flow of residual byproducts, steam and/or quench fluid for delivery within the spool 20.
The outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle 14 may also be constructed to be elliptical in design so as to accommodate material as it passes from the outlet 81 into the spool 20 and vessel. In various embodiments, the shape of the outlet 81 may be modified to accommodate various velocities and viscosities and material types being passed through the retractable injection nozzle 14. Additionally, the shape and size of the opening may be modified to control the spray pattern and flow characteristics of material and/or fluid ejecting from the outlet 81 of the retractable injection nozzle. For example, a larger outlet 81 may be used to reduce the velocity of residual byproduct material exiting the retractable injection nozzle 14. In other embodiments, a smaller outlet 81 may be used to produce a stream of higher velocity residual byproduct entering the spool 20 and vessel. In this fashion, the pattern of molten residual byproduct being ejected from the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be controlled, which increases longevity of vessels and spools, increases safety, improves yield of volatile organic compounds and effectively reduces the amount of downtime necessary for maintenance and repair.
Various methods for retracting the retractable injection nozzle 14 may be utilized according to embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, an actuator 110 may be attached to the first end of the retractable injection nozzle 86. The actuator 110 may be used to apply force to the retractable injection nozzle 14, effectively retracting the retractable injection nozzle 14 from the interior of the spool 30. As depicted in
Typically, the hardened carbonaceous material is cut away from the interior of a vessel utilizing a high pressure water drill. As the solid carbonaceous material is cut away from the interior of the vessel, it falls though a port in the bottom of the vessel through the interior 30 of the spool 20 to an area below the vessel commonly referred to as the chute, where it is collected and discarded or utilized for subsequent purposes.
The process of delayed coking, and particularly the steps of directing a residual byproduct into an inlet from a feed source and allowing the residual byproduct to be dispensed or disposed within the vessel, comprises utilizing a dispenser that functions to dispose or direct the byproduct into the vessel.
As a feed line is attached to inlet 6, the residual byproduct in the feed line is received through opening 8 in inlet 6, routed through the pipe structure of inlet 6, and dispensed or disposed within vessel 2. During the fill cycle and/or once the vessel is full, steam may be piped through the inlet system into the vessel. Steam clears the inlet system 10 and strips the coke of valuable hydrocarbon by products, which are allowed to escape through the overhead feed line where they are typically routed to fractionators. Once all of the valuable hydrocarbon by products have been stripped from the coke resident in the vessel, steam is pumped into the vessel and released through an outlet to the blow down recovery area until the drum temperature of the vessel and its contents reaches approximately 500° F. Typically thereafter, water is pumped into the vessel through the inlet system and released into the blow down area until the contents of the vessel reach approximately 200° F. Once quenched the deheader valves are opened and the process of cutting coke from the interior of the vessel begins.
The simple design depicted in
Because some embodiments of the center feed system utilize a retractable injection nozzle as depicted in
In addition to effectively sealing inlet 6 of the spool 20, the retractable injection nozzle 14 seals the opening in the curved pipe segment 63 blocking the flow of matter and/or fluid from inlet feeds 3. Once the solid carbonaceous material has been removed from the interior of the vessel by means utilized in the art, the vessel is clear and ready to be filled with additional residual byproduct. At a desired time, the retractable injection nozzle could then be moved to an open position as illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 5-7, reopening the passageway from the inlet sleeve 58, through the inlet 80, through the retractable injection nozzle 14 and to the outlet 81, allowing a subsequent cycle of residual byproduct to be pumped into the vessel. In this fashion, the process of filling, quenching and removing solid carbonaceous material from a coker vessel may be accomplished repetitively, with minimal damage to the coker vessel and spool of a delayed coker unit system.
The first end of the retractable injection nozzle 86 may be structured to provide attachment to an actuating means, allowing the retractable injection nozzle 14 to interchangeably be moved to an open or retracted position to allow for subsequent cycles of coking and decoking of a vessel. Various actuator means are contemplated by the present invention. For example, electric actuating means, hydraulic actuating means, pneumatic actuating means and manual actuating means may all be utilized in accord with various embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art would appreciate that other actuating means are available and may be utilized in conjunction with the present invention to effect the desirable control over the opening and retracting of the injection nozzle 14 itself.
The present invention contemplates that the shape of the retractable injection nozzle 14 will conform to the interior cavity of the inlet sleeve. While depicted with a circular cross section in
As noted previously, the size and shape of the inlet 80 and outlet 81 may be altered to conform, as is the case, with inlet 80 with the shape of the interior of the inlet sleeve 58 at the curved pipe segment 63, allowing for fluid passage of residual byproduct through the inlet sleeve 58 and injection nozzle 14 without encountering resistance of obtrusive structural elements.
As previously noted, the use of multiple openings and a collar or other flow control apparatus may be utilized as desirable to produce desirable flow patterns of residual by-product, steam and or quench fluid into a vessel. As depicted in
As depicted in
The retractable injection nozzle 14 may be structured to conform to the interior cavity of the inlet sleeve. As depicted in
Different flow consistencies and velocities may dictate further that the various constitutive elements of the retractable injection nozzle be structured to utilize different cross sectional shapes. For example, as illustrated in
As previously noted, the size and shape of the inlet 80, 130 and the outlet 81, 128 may be altered to conform with the inlet 80, 130 with the shape of the interior of the inlet sleeve 58, allowing fluid passage of residual by-product, steam and or quench fluid through the inlet sleeve 58 and injection nozzle 14, without encountering resistance of obtrusive structural elements. Alternatively, obtrusive structural elements or flow control structures may be utilized to alter the flow patterns of residual by-product, steam and or quench fluid through the retractable injection nozzle 14 into the interior of the vessel. As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
In addition to altering the angle at which the collar body 132 is disposed relative to the flow of fluid through the straight segment of the interior cavity 84, it is contemplated that various shapes for collar outlets may be utilized. As depicted in
Alternative obstructive elements and flow control structures may be utilized. For example,
As another example,
It should be noted that the present invention center feed system 10 and dispenser system can be used with or coupled directly to a coke drum, eliminating the use of a spool 20 section. In this embodiment, the center feed system 10 and system would function as described above, only the residual byproduct would be dispensed directly into the coke drum.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation-in-part from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/369,691, filed Feb. 11, 2009, and entitled, “Center Feed System.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
176321 | Kromer | Apr 1876 | A |
1656355 | Huffmann | Jan 1928 | A |
1991621 | Noll | Feb 1935 | A |
2064567 | Riley | Dec 1936 | A |
2245554 | Court | Jun 1941 | A |
2317566 | Utterback | Apr 1943 | A |
2403608 | Payne et al. | Jul 1946 | A |
2562285 | Timmer | Jul 1951 | A |
2717865 | Kimberlin, Jr. et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2734715 | Knox | Feb 1956 | A |
2761160 | Manning | Sep 1956 | A |
2950897 | Bryant | Aug 1960 | A |
3215399 | McInerney et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3367625 | Fortune | Feb 1968 | A |
3379623 | Forsyth | Apr 1968 | A |
3498323 | Rahm | Mar 1970 | A |
3617480 | Keel | Nov 1971 | A |
3646947 | Rochelle et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3716310 | Guenther | Feb 1973 | A |
3837356 | Selep et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3852047 | Schlinger et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4125438 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4174728 | Usnick et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4253487 | Worley et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4275842 | Purton et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4335733 | Richards | Jun 1982 | A |
4410398 | Chipman et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
RE31439 | Rosensweig | Nov 1983 | E |
4492103 | Naumann | Jan 1985 | A |
4531539 | Jandrasi et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4611613 | Kaplan | Sep 1986 | A |
4626320 | Alworth et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4666585 | Figgins et al. | May 1987 | A |
4726109 | Malsbury et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4738399 | Adams | Apr 1988 | A |
4771805 | Maa | Sep 1988 | A |
4797197 | Mallari | Jan 1989 | A |
4824016 | Cody et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4877488 | Cody et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4923021 | Courmier et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929339 | Elliott, Jr. et al. | May 1990 | A |
4960358 | Digiacomo et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973386 | Callegari et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4993264 | Cody et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004152 | Baker et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022266 | Cody et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022268 | Wolf et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024730 | Colvert | Jun 1991 | A |
5035221 | Martin | Jul 1991 | A |
5041207 | Harrington et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5048876 | Wallskog | Sep 1991 | A |
5059331 | Goyal | Oct 1991 | A |
5107873 | Clinger | Apr 1992 | A |
5116022 | Genreith et al. | May 1992 | A |
5221019 | Pechacek et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228525 | Denney et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5228825 | Fruchtbaum et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5299841 | Schaefer | Apr 1994 | A |
5417811 | Malsbury | May 1995 | A |
H1442 | Edgerton et al. | Jun 1995 | H |
5464035 | Heinecke | Nov 1995 | A |
5581864 | Rabet | Dec 1996 | A |
5633462 | Heaslip et al. | May 1997 | A |
5652145 | Cody et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5785843 | Antalffy et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800680 | Guerra | Sep 1998 | A |
5816505 | Tran et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5816787 | Brinkerhoff et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5876568 | Kindersley | Mar 1999 | A |
5907491 | Canada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5927684 | Marx et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947674 | Malsbury et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974887 | Cody et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007068 | Dellacorte | Dec 1999 | A |
6039844 | Malik | Mar 2000 | A |
6066237 | Kindersley | May 2000 | A |
6113745 | Maitland et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117308 | Ganji | Sep 2000 | A |
6223925 | Malsbury et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228225 | Meher-Homji | May 2001 | B1 |
6254733 | Lu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264797 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264829 | Antalffy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6367843 | Fetzer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6539805 | Heaslip et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547250 | Noble et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565714 | Lah | May 2003 | B2 |
6644436 | Hofmann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6644567 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660131 | Lah | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6738697 | Breed | May 2004 | B2 |
6751852 | Malsbury et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6843889 | Lah | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6926807 | Bosi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964727 | Lah | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989081 | Lah | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7033460 | Lah | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037408 | Wilborn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7115190 | Lah | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117959 | Lah | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7316762 | Lah | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7736470 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020134658 | Lah | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157897 | Hofmann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166862 | Malsbury et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170814 | Lah | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030047153 | Kubel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030089589 | Malsbury | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127314 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159737 | Stares | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185718 | Sellakumar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040118746 | Wilborn et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040154913 | Lah | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050161372 | Colic | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20090209799 | Etter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000145989 | May 2000 | JP |
2043604 | Oct 1995 | RU |
2163359 | Feb 2001 | RU |
558524 | Nov 1973 | SU |
558524 | Nov 1973 | SU |
959413 | Dec 1980 | SU |
959413 | Dec 1980 | SU |
0015985 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zappe, R.W., Valve Selection Handbook, Fourth Edition, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Non-Final Rejection issued Feb. 23, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. pp. 1-10. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Final Rejection issued Jun. 28, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. pp. 1-7. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Examiner's search and strategy results issued Sep. 26, 2005. 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Notice of Allowance of Fees Due, Issue Information, Index of Claims and Search information issued Sep. 29, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Notice of Allowance of Fees Dues, List of References, Issue Information, Search information and index of claims issued Jan. 18, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Non-Final Rejection issued Oct. 13, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Non-Final Rejection issued Apr. 26, 2007 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Requirement for Restriction/Election, List of References and index of claims issued Sep. 6, 2007 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Dec. 5, 2007, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,874, Non-Final Rejection issued Dec. 11, 2007 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,834, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Jun. 22, 2005; 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,834, Non-Final Rejection issued Jul. 6, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,834, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Sep. 26, 2005; 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,834, Notice of Allowance and Fees, Issue Information, Index of Claims and search information issued Sep. 29, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/411,849, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Aug. 4, 2005; 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/411,849, Non-Final Rejection issued Aug. 9, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/411,849, Non-Final Rejection issued Feb. 8, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/411,849, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Jul. 18, 2006; 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/411,849, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Examiner Interview Summary Record, Issue Information, Index of Claims, Search Information and Bibliographic Data Sheet issued Jul. 24, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,234, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Mar. 14, 2006; 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,234, Non-Final Rejection issued Mar. 20, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,234, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Aug. 4, 2006; 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,234, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Issue Information, Bibliographic Data Sheet, Index of Claims and Search Information issued Aug. 10, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,628, Non-Final Rejection issued Feb. 16, 2007 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,628, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Bibliographic Data Sheet, Index of Claims, Search Information and Issue Information issued Aug. 24, 2007, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/873,022, Non-Final Rejection issued Jul. 7, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/873,022, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Specification and Issue Information issued Jun. 4, 2006 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/274,280, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Mar. 14, 2004; 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/274,280, Non-Final Rejection issued Mar. 25, 2004 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/274,280, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Issue Information and Bibliographic Data Sheet issued Oct. 5, 2004 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,673, Examiner's search strategy and results issued Aug. 26, 2004, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,673, Non-Final Rejection issued Sep. 1, 2004 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,673, Final Rejection issued Feb. 23, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,673, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, Amendment After Final, Issue Information, Index of Claims and Search Information issued Apr. 20, 2005 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office; 10 pages. |
J. J. Kelley, “Applied Artificial Intelligence for Delayed Coking”, Hydrocarbon Processing, Nov. 2000, 144-A-144-J, Gulf Publishing Company, USA. |
Claudio Allevato & Richard S. Boswell, “Assessing the Structural Integrity and Remaining Life of Coke Drums with Acoustic Emission Testing, Stain Gaging, and Finite Element Analysis,” ETCE 99—Symposium on Plant and Facilities Reliability and Mechanical Integrity, 1999 Engineering Source Technology Conference & Exhibition, Stress Engineering Services, Inc. |
Norm Lieberman, “Coke Drum Foam-Overs Causes & Cures,” http://www.coking.com/Foamover.htm. |
Paul J. Ellis & Christopher A. Paul, “Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals,” AlChE 1998 Spring National Meeting's International Conference on Refinery Processes Topical Conference Preprints 1998, 1998, Great Lakes Carbon Corporation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100252409 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12369691 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 12703644 | US |