This non-provisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) on Patent Application No. 201510204753.9 filed in P.R. China on Apr. 27, 2015, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Some references, if any, which may include patents, patent applications and various publications, may be cited and discussed in the description of this invention. The citation and/or discussion of such references, if any, is provided merely to clarify the description of the present invention and is not an admission that any such reference is “prior art” to the invention described herein. All references listed, cited and/or discussed in this specification are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and to the same extent as if each reference was individually incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a transformer, and in particular, to a center-tapped transformer which can achieve a minimum loss in the same window area.
In recent years, the miniaturization of switching power supplies has been an important development tendency, but magnetic elements have occupied a fairly large proportion of switching power supplies in terms of volume, weight, loss and cost, etc. Increasing the frequency of switching power supplies is an effective means of reducing the volume of magnetic elements and increasing the power density of switching power supplies, and it is also a hotspot of magnetic design at present. As frequency rises, both a magnetic core loss and a winding loss increase sharply. Thus, decreasing the magnetic core loss and the winding loss is more important for the analysis and design of magnetic devices.
Center-tapped transformer is widely used in power converter with two secondary windings to perform dual half-wave rectification. Different from a non-center tapped transformer, the currents flowing through the two secondary windings of the center-tapped transformer are not synchronous, i.e., the two secondary windings work at a time-sharing mode. An eddy current loss still can be induced in one of the two secondary windings through which current doesn't flow. Due to the particularity of the currents flowing through the two secondary windings in a center-tapped transformer, the analysis of its loss is different from an ordinary non-center tapped transformer.
For a center-tapped transformer, it is a common practice in the prior art that the copper sheet for each layer of the primary and secondary windings has the same thickness. Although it is convenient to design and manufacture such a center-tapped transformer, it is not the best choice in terms of loss and volume.
Refer to
The present disclosure provides a center-tapped transformer comprises a magnetic core and windings. The windings include a primary winding and secondary windings. The primary winding comprises at least one layer of a primary effective conductor, and the secondary windings comprise at least one layer of a first secondary effective conductor and at least one layer of a second secondary effective conductor. The outer surface of each of the primary effective conductor and the first and second secondary effective conductors is coated with an insulating layer. A transformer window is surrounded by the magnetic core, the height h is the dimension of the transformer window in the stacking direction of the primary winding and the secondary winding. The thickness dp of a single layer of the primary effective conductor and the thickness d, of a single layer of the first or second secondary effective conductor are the respective heights of the primary effective conductor and the first or second secondary effective conductor in the stacking direction, wherein the total thickness hp of the primary effective conductors and the total thickness hs of the secondary effective conductors satisfy 0.65<hp/hs<0.8, and wherein the total thickness hp of the primary effective conductors is equal to the sum of the thicknesses dp of all the layers of the primary effective conductors, and the total thickness hs of the secondary effective conductors is equal to the sum of the thicknesses ds of all the layers of the first secondary effective conductors and the second secondary effective conductors.
Hereinafter, the present disclosure is described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments, which, however, are not to limit the present disclosure.
Hereinafter, the structure principle and the working principle of the present disclosure will be specifically described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
According to the FFT values of the current waveforms of the various windings (namely, the primary winding, the first secondary winding and the second secondary winding) of the center-tapped transformer of the present disclosure, the optimum proportion range of the effective conductor thicknesses of the primary and secondary windings of the center-tapped transformer is determined in consideration of the losses caused by the high-frequency skin effect and the proximity effect, in order to achieve a minimum loss in the same window area. In the prior art, the design that the effective conductors in the primary and secondary windings have the same thickness is often chosen. Although this choice is convenient, the loss is high. Under different working conditions, the proportions of the effective conductor thicknesses of the primary and secondary windings, as determined by the present disclosure, lead to a reduction in the loss of the windings by from about 5% to about 12%, compared with the design that the effective conductors in the primary and secondary windings have the same thickness.
Refer to
Refer to
For a center-tapped transformer, it is defined that the total thickness of the primary effective conductors within the window 4 is hp, the total thickness of the first secondary effective conductors and the second secondary effective conductors is hs, and when hp and hs satisfy 0.65<hp/hs<0.8, the loss of the windings in the transformer is within a narrower range.
In an ideal center-tapped transformer, the fundamental harmonic component (denoted as Ip1, rms) of the current in the primary winding is high, while the amount of DC component and the higher harmonic component is low that they can be ignored; the fundamental harmonic component (denoted as Ip1, rms) and the DC component (denoted as Isdc) of the current in the secondary windings is high, while the higher harmonic component is low that it can be ignored, too. Thus, the losses of the windings in an ideal center-tapped transformer can be divided into the losses of fundamental harmonics of the currents in the primary winding and secondary windings and the DC losses in the secondary windings, wherein the losses of fundamental harmonic components of the currents in the primary and secondary windings are high. In addition, in an ideal center-tapped transformer, the total fundamental harmonic components in the primary and secondary windings are balanced, i.e., the total fundamental harmonic components in the primary winding plus the total fundamental harmonic components in the two secondary windings is equal to 0, that is, Ip1+Is1=0, and the direction of current flowing through the primary winding Ip1 is and the direction of current flowing through the first second secondary winding Is1 are opposite. As is known to all, when a direct current Idc flows through a winding, there is only a DC,loss and the related computational formula is as follows:
Wherein Rdc stands for DC resistance, ρ stands for the resistivity of the winding, le stands for the length of the winding, d stands for the thickness of the effective conductor in the winding, and w stands for the width of the effective conductor in the winding. Thus it can be seen that under the circumstance that the other conditions are definite, the thicker the effective conductor, the smaller the DC loss. If a high frequency AC IHF flows through the winding, the resistance of the winding will increase as a result of the phenomena unique to high frequencies, e.g., the skin effect, the proximity effect and the effect of the air gap 7, and the situation will become very complicated. To make it simple, like the DC loss, the loss of the high frequency winding is generally represented by the following formula:
LossHF=IHF2×Rdc×Kac (2)
Wherein Kac stands for AC coefficient, which characterizes the ratio of high-frequency resistance to DC resistance. In general, the thicker the effective conductor, the smaller the DC loss and the greater Kac. However, by and large, the loss of the high frequency winding tends to be reduced with the increasing thickness of the effective conductor. If an appropriate structure is selected, the Kac of the ideal transformer will be lower, for example, approximately in the range of from 1.1 to 2.0. In this case, in consideration of the fundamental harmonic components of the currents in the primary and secondary windings and the amount of DC components in the secondary windings, the total loss of the transformer is represented by the following formula:
Loss=Ip12×Rp×KP+Is12×Rs×Ks+Is12×T2×Rs (3)
Wherein Rp and Rs stand for the DC resistances of the primary and secondary windings, respectively, and Kp and Ks stand for the alternating current coefficients (AC coefficients) of the primary and secondary windings, respectively. According to different working conditions, the ratios T standing for the DC components of the currents in the secondary windings to the fundamental harmonic components of the currents in the secondary windings are different. Typically, this ratio is from about 0.5 to about 0.9. Moreover, because of
I
p1
=−I
s1 (4),
Loss=Is12×Rp×Kp+Is12×Rs×Ks+Is12×T2×Rs (5).
Under the total thickness of effective conductors is definite, in order to achieve a relatively small overall loss of the windings, it is appropriate to make the loss of the primary winding substantially equivalent to the loss of the secondary windings, i.e.,
R
p
×K
p
=R
s
×K
s
+T
2
×R
s (6)
If KP=Ks=1.5, when T=0.5, Rs/Rp shall be 0.86, and then the ratio np/ns of the primary effective conductor thickness to the secondary effective conductor thickness is 0.86; similarly, if T=0.9, np/ns shall be 0.65. Thus it can be seen that the greater T is, i.e., the higher proportion the DC components of the currents in the secondary windings account for, the higher proportion the thicknesses of the secondary effective conductors will account for.
The above inference is based on the assumption that all the AC coefficients of the primary and secondary windings are 1.5, and the conclusion thus drawn is that the ratio of the primary effective conductor thickness to the secondary effective conductor thickness should satisfy 0.65<hp/hs<0.86. As previously described, the thicker the effective conductor, the greater the AC coefficient. That is to say, Kac might be greater than or less than 1.5. Furthermore, it can be given that the thicknesses of the primary and secondary effective conductors may be different, the AC coefficients, i.e. Kp and Ks, of the primary and secondary windings should not be exactly the same. In consideration of the actual range of Kac of from 1.1 to 2.0, based on a large amount of simulation data and calculating data in combination with the current waveforms of the various windings of a center-tapped transformer under different working conditions, it has been finally determined that the ratio of the total thickness of the primary effective conductors to the total thickness of the secondary effective conductors is in the range of 0.65<hp/hs<0.8. The total loss of the windings is relatively small, and the loss can be reduced by from about 5% to about 12%, compared with the thickness of copper sheets in the prior art, i.e., the total thickness of the primary effective conductors is equal to the total thickness of the secondary effective conductors. In particular, the effect is especially obvious when the operating frequency of the circuit is between 500 k and 2 MHz.
As for a center-tapped transformer applied to a resonant circuit, e.g., a center-tapped transformer applied to a LLC circuit, there should be 0.7<hp/hs<0.8. Regarding the center-tapped transformer, the ratio of the DC components of currents in the secondary windings to the fundamental harmonic components of currents in the secondary windings is about 0.6, and this ratio varies slightly under different working conditions.
As for a center-tapped transformer applied to a PWM circuit, there should be 0.65<hp/hs<0.75. Regarding the center-tapped transformer, the ratio of the DC components of the currents in the secondary windings to the fundamental harmonic components of the currents in the secondary windings is about 0.9, and this ratio varies slightly under different working conditions. Compared with the center-tapped transformer applied to a LLC circuit, the DC components of the currents in the secondary windings of the center-tapped transformer applied to a PWM circuit accounts for a higher proportion, thus the thicknesses of the secondary effective conductors of the center-tapped transformer applied to a PWM circuit account for a higher proportion than the thicknesses of the secondary effective conductors of the center-tapped transformer applied to a LLC circuit.
A center-tapped transformer often has windings with S1 P S2 as the winding unit, so that the transformer has the winding which has a 3n layer structure being stacked up by n winding unit, wherein n is a natural number. The winding has 3n layers of effective conductors. The peer to peer secondary windings S1 and S2 in the winding unit may be interchanged, i.e., stacking can be performed by using S2 P S1 as the winding unit. In order to make S1 and S2 in the circuit be symmetrical as much as possible, the thicknesses of the effective conductors in the secondary windings S1 and S2 should be equal in principle, without considering problems such as tolerance existed in the production process. Referring to
Refer to
Refer to
Refer to
Refer to
In this example, the primary effective conductor and the first and second secondary effective conductors are copper sheets. Suppose the copper sheets have a width of 4 mm, the insulating layer 3 between the copper sheets has a thickness of 0.1 mm, the total thickness of the copper sheets is 0.5 mm, and the working temperature is 25° C. If the total thickness of copper sheets of the primary winding in the transformer is equal to the total thickness of copper sheets of the secondary windings, the thickness of each of the copper sheets is 0.083 mm. When the copper sheet of the winding is 1 meter long, the total loss of the windings in the transformer, through simulation and calculation, is 2.9 W; if the ratio of the thickness dp of a single layer of copper sheet 2 of the primary winding in the transformer to the thickness ds of a single layer of copper sheet of the first secondary winding is 1.6, i.e., the thickness of a single layer of copper sheet of the primary winding 2 is 0.11 mm, the thickness of a single layer of copper sheet of the first secondary winding is 0.069 mm and the copper sheet of the winding is 1 meter long, too, then the loss will be 2.6 W, that is, reduced by 11.5%. The above are listed below:
Thus it can be seen that, according to the FFT values of the current waveforms of the various windings of the center-tapped transformer of the present disclosure, the optimum proportion range of the effective conductor thicknesses of the primary and secondary windings of the center-tapped transformer is determined in consideration of the losses caused by the high-frequency skin effect and the proximity effect, in order to achieve a minimum loss in the same area of the window 4. Under different working conditions, the proportions of the thicknesses of copper sheets of the primary and secondary in the present disclosure reduce the loss of the windings by from about 5% to about 12%, compared with the structure in the prior art that all copper sheets the primary and secondary are of the same thickness.
Of course, the present disclosure may have a variety of other embodiments. Those skilled in the art can make all kinds of corresponding changes and modifications according to the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and essence of the present disclosure. It is intended that all these changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims of the present disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
201510204753.9 | Apr 2015 | CN | national |