The present invention relates to a centraliser for centralising a tubular within a conduit. Particularly, but not exclusively, the centraliser is for centralising a tubular within a deviated conduit.
Centralisers are widely used within the hydrocarbon extraction industry to centraliser a tubular within a wellbore. It may be necessary to centralise a tubular to allow the passage of services, such as hydraulic lines or electrical cables, in the annulus between the tubular and the wellbore, or to ensure that cement flows around the entire perimeter of the tubular during a cementing operation in which cement is pumped into the annulus.
Several types of centraliser, such as bow spring centralisers, are known. However, conventional centralisers tend to have limited load bearing capacity and, for example, in a deviated well where the tubular may lie at an angle to the vertical, to centralise the tubular, the centraliser has to bear some of the weight of the tubular. If the centraliser does not centralise a tubular effectively in this situation then, for example in a cementing operation, the cement may not be able to flow fully around and encase the tubular.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a centraliser for centralising a tubular within a conduit, the centraliser comprising:
a centraliser body;
at least one finger pivotally mounted to the body; and
at least one collar, the/each collar being movable with respect to the at least one finger;
wherein relative movement between the/each collar and the body pivots the at least one finger from a run-in configuration to an extended configuration.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a centraliser in which fingers are used to centralise a tubular within a conduit, such as casing, lining or open hole. As the fingers are moved to the extended configuration, they engage and press against the conduit wall, moving the tubular towards the centre of the conduit.
Preferably, the at least one collar is moveably connected to the/each finger.
Preferably, relative movement which brings the/each collar and body towards each other, pivots the/each finger from the run-in configuration to the extended configuration.
Additionally, relative movement which moves the/each collar and body apart may pivot the/each finger from the extended configuration to the run-in configuration.
The body may be fixed relative to the/each finger.
In a preferred embodiment, to pivot the/each finger from the run-in configuration to the extended configuration, the/each collar moves towards the body.
In a preferred embodiment, to pivot the/each finger from the extended configuration to the run-in configuration, the/each collar moves away from the body.
In a preferred embodiment there are a plurality of fingers.
The/each collar may be moveably connected to the/each finger by means of at least one lug moving with at least one track. A track and lug arrangement allows for the setting of the fingers to be achieved in a controlled and predictable manner.
In one embodiment, each finger defines at least one track, each track engaged with a lug defined by one of said collars.
In this embodiment, each finger may define two tracks.
In an alternative embodiment, the/each collar defines a plurality of tracks, at least one track being associated with each finger, each track engaged with a lug defined by a finger.
In this embodiment, each finger may define two lugs, each lug engaged with a track defined by one of said collars.
Each lug may continuously engage the track with which it is engaged. By continuously it is meant each lug engages a track at the run-in configuration and the extended configuration and all configurations therebetween.
In one embodiment, the engagement between the lugs and tracks retains each finger in the run-in configuration. As the lug engages the track in a run-in configuration, the fingers can be retained in the run-in configuration to prevent setting occurring inadvertently.
Alternatively each lug may engage the track only in the run-in configuration.
In one embodiment, the engagement between the lugs and tracks assists the pivoting of the fingers from the extended to the run-in configuration. The engagement between the lugs and tracks can be used to pull the fingers from the extended to the run-in configuration ensuring predictable and controlled de-setting of the centraliser, if required.
The collar may define at least one finger engaging surface adapted to engage an underside of each finger. A finger engaging surface can, in one embodiment, act as a wedge to maintain a finger in the run-in configuration.
Preferably, engagement of the/each finger engaging surface and the underside of the/each finger assists in pivoting the fingers from the run-in to the extended configuration.
Preferably, the/each finger is hingedly mounted to the body.
In one embodiment, the/each finger is mounted to the body by means of a hinge pin.
Preferably, the/each hinge pin is captively received by the body.
Preferably, the/each finger defines a hemicylindrical end.
Preferably, the/each hemicylindrical end is received within a hemicylindrical socket defined by the body. The use of a hemicylindrical end and a hemicylindrical socket assists in the transfer of load from the fingers to the centraliser body.
Preferably, the/each finger defines a conduit engaging surface.
Preferably, each conduit engaging surface is at an end of the finger opposite the hemispherical end.
Each conduit engaging surface may include a smooth portion to assist, in use, the finger sliding across the conduit surface.
Each conduit engaging surface may include a rough portion adapted, in use, to grip the conduit surface. Such an arrangement permits the centraliser fingers to be used as slips.
The rough portion may define serrations.
In one embodiment, the centraliser is set by exposure to well pressure.
In this embodiment, pistons may be provided to provide relative movement between the/each collar and the body. The pistons may be activated by exposure to hydrostatic pressure in the well.
The centraliser may further comprise at least one locking device to lock the centraliser in the extended configuration.
The/each locking device may prevent the centraliser fingers from moving from the extended configuration to the run-in configuration.
The/each locking device may be adapted to lock the/each collar relative to the body portion.
The/each locking device may be a uni-directional device in that it permits movement in a first direction but not in a second direction, opposite the first direction.
The/each locking device may be a ratchet.
The centraliser may comprise at least one retaining device for releasably retaining the centraliser in the run-in configuration. A retaining device prevents the centraliser from setting inadvertently.
In one embodiment there are two sets of centraliser fingers and two collars, one collar associated with each set of centraliser fingers.
In this embodiment the fingers of one set may pivot in a first direction with respect to the centraliser body and the fingers of the other set may pivot in a second direction with respect to the centraliser body, the second direction being opposite to the first direction. Such an arrangement permits both sets of fingers to be set by a single actuator.
Preferably the/each collar applies a setting pressure to the fingers to move the fingers from the run-in configuration to the extended configuration.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of centralising a tubular within a conduit, the method comprising:
providing a centraliser connected to a tubular within a wellbore;
causing relative movement between at least one centraliser collar and a centraliser body to pivot at least one centraliser finger from a run-in configuration to an extended configuration, the/each finger engaging the conduit during movement from the run-in configuration to the extended configuration to move the tubular towards a central location within the conduit.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring firstly to
Relative movement of the collars 18,20 towards the body 12 applies a setting pressure to the fingers 14,16 and pivots the fingers 14,16 from a run-in configuration to an extended configuration. As can be seen from
In the extended configuration, each finger 14,16 contacts the conduit wall W. In particular a wall engaging surface 17 defined by each finger 14,16 contacts the wall W. If the tubular is off-centre in the conduit C (see
It will be noted from
Referring to
It can also be seen from
Referring to
This arrangement has a number of advantages. As can be seen in
The second advantage of the lug 38 and track 32 arrangement is apparent during setting of the fingers 14,16. As the fingers 14,16 move from the run-in to the set configurations, the lugs move along the track 32 controlling the rate of deployment of the fingers 14,16, ensuring the deployment occurs predictably. Furthermore, if it is necessary to de-set the centraliser, movement of the collars 18,20 away from the body portion 12 will pull the fingers 14,16 back to the run-in configuration through the interaction to the lugs 38 and the track 32.
As already described, the centraliser 10 is set by movement of the collars 18,20 towards the body 12, which applies a setting pressure to the fingers 14,16. This setting pressure and movement of the collars 18,20 can be achieved in a number of ways, including, for example, applying a pressure from surface or providing pistons which when exposed to well pressure, drive the collars 18,20 towards the centraliser body 12.
A piston driving arrangement is shown in
The second collar 120 is attached to a sleeve 150 which is adapted to slide along a mandrel 152. The sleeve 150 is initially pinned to the mandrel 152 by means of a number of shear screws 168. The sleeve 150 and the mandrel 152 are arranged to define a void 154 therebetween which is in fluid communication with a mandrel throughbore 156 via a port 158. The void 154 is sealed by two pairs of annular seals 160,162 such that when the mandrel throughbore 156 is at a given pressure, the void 154 is at the same pressure.
If the pressure in the void 154 is greater than the pressure in an annulus 164 defined between the centraliser 110 and the wellbore wall 166, the sleeve 150 moves in the direction of arrow A, opening up the void 154 and moving the centraliser collar 120 beneath the second set of fingers 116, in turn moving the fingers 116 from the run-in configuration to the set configuration. The shear screws 168 serve to retain the sleeve 150 relative to the mandrel 152 until the pressure in the void 154 is sufficiently high to shear the screws 168.
The collar 120 also defines a toothed profile 170 which engages a toothed mandrel profile 172. The engagement between the toothed profiles 170,172 is such that movement in the direction of arrow A is permitted but movement in the return direction, opposite the direction of arrow A, is prevented. This arrangement locks the collar 120 and the second set of fingers 116 in the run-in configuration.
It will be understood that a similar arrangement can be used to set and lock the first set of fingers.
Various improvements and modifications may be made to the above described embodiment without parting from the scope of the invention. For example, although two sets of fingers are shown as part of the centraliser, multiple sets of fingers could be used or, indeed, multiple centralisers could be used along the length of the tubular. In addition, although six fingers are described for each set, more or less than six may provide utility.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0804961.1 | Mar 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2009/000730 | 3/18/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/21/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/115802 | 9/24/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
643358 | Konold | Feb 1900 | A |
2009322 | Emil | Jul 1935 | A |
2181748 | Thaheld | Nov 1939 | A |
2498791 | Clark | Feb 1950 | A |
2546377 | Turechek | Mar 1951 | A |
2738018 | Lynes | Mar 1956 | A |
2832418 | Baker | Apr 1958 | A |
3066738 | Myers | Dec 1962 | A |
3087552 | Graham | Apr 1963 | A |
3167127 | Sizer | Jan 1965 | A |
3167128 | Sutliff | Jan 1965 | A |
3283821 | Brown | Nov 1966 | A |
3342268 | Brown | Sep 1967 | A |
3371716 | Current | Mar 1968 | A |
3482889 | Cochran | Dec 1969 | A |
3570603 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3572450 | Thompson | Mar 1971 | A |
3623551 | Randermann | Nov 1971 | A |
3722588 | Tamplen | Mar 1973 | A |
3729170 | Lewis | Apr 1973 | A |
3889750 | Mullins | Jun 1975 | A |
4046405 | Bonds | Sep 1977 | A |
4127168 | Hanson | Nov 1978 | A |
4317485 | Ross | Mar 1982 | A |
4331315 | Geisow | May 1982 | A |
4346919 | Morrill | Aug 1982 | A |
4375240 | Baugh | Mar 1983 | A |
4473125 | Addudle et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4588030 | Blizzard | May 1986 | A |
4917187 | Burns | Apr 1990 | A |
2230447 | Bassinger | Feb 1991 | A |
5058684 | Winslow | Oct 1991 | A |
5095978 | Akkerman | Mar 1992 | A |
5261488 | Gullet | Nov 1993 | A |
5542473 | Pringle | Aug 1996 | A |
6062309 | Gosse | May 2000 | A |
6315041 | Carlisle | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7690424 | McLeod | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20030000607 | Jenner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030173076 | Sheiretov et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040055757 | Beall | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050224227 | Hendrie | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090308592 | Mercer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3812211 | Nov 1989 | DE |
19827708 | Jan 1999 | DE |
0468668 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0485080 | May 1992 | EP |
1408195 | Apr 2004 | EP |
755082 | Aug 1956 | GB |
1257790 | Dec 1971 | GB |
1364054 | Aug 1974 | GB |
2118659 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2224526 | May 1990 | GB |
2245624 | Aug 1992 | GB |
2328230 | Feb 1999 | GB |
2428708 | Feb 2007 | GB |
WO 0242672 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2005026494 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005121498 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006046075 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007109878 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/GB2005/001391, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability, Jun. 23, 2005. |
PCT/GB2005/001391, International Search Report, Jun. 23, 2005. |
PCT/GB2005/001391, Written Opinion, Jun. 23, 2005. |
PCT/GB2005/004200, Written Opinion, Apr. 10, 2006. |
PCT/GB2005/004200, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability, May 1, 2007. |
PCT/GB2005/004200, International Search Report, Jan. 11, 2006. |
PCT/GB2005/003871, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability, Sep. 11, 2007. |
PCT/GB2005/003871, International Search Report, Nov. 17, 2005. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/816,421, Mar. 30, 2009. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/816,421, Sep. 28, 2009. |
Foreign Office Action (UL) dated Nov. 1, 2005 (U.S. Appl. No. 11/816,421 is §371 of same UK app.). |
PCT/GB2005/003871, Written Opinion, Nov. 22, 2005. |
PCT/GB2006/001297, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, Oct. 9, 2007. |
PCT/GB2006/001297, International Search Report, Oct. 9, 2007. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/909,820, May 29, 2009. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/909,820, Feb. 19, 2010. |
PCT/GB2007/001040, International Search Report, Jun. 5, 2010. |
PCT/GB2007/001040, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, Sep. 23, 2008. |
PCT/GB2007/004372, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, May 19, 2009. |
PCT/GB2007/004372, International Search Report, Jan. 23, 2008. |
PCT/GB2008/002042, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, Dec. 20, 2009. |
PCT/GB2008/002042, International Search Report, Oct. 17, 2008. |
PCT/GB2009/071874, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, Jun. 8, 2010. |
PCT/GB2009/071874, International Search Report, Jul. 23, 2009. |
PCT/GB2008/003883, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, May 25, 2010. |
PCT/GB2008/003883, International Search Report, Mar. 26, 2009. |
PCT/GB2009/0004830, Int'l Prelim. Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, Aug. 24, 2010. |
PCT/GB2009/0004830, International Search Report, Sep. 28, 2009. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,866, Aug. 25, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/GB2009/000730, Sep. 24, 2009. |
Written Opinion for PCT/GB2009/000730, Sep. 18, 2010. |
Office Action, Applicant's co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/909,820, Oct. 7, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/GB2009/000770, Oct. 8, 2009. |
Written Opinion for PCT/GB2009/000770, Sep. 29, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110005776 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |