Patent Application
20050171608
Embodiments of the invention relate generally to devices and methods for accomplishing spinal surgery, and more particularly in some embodiments, to spinal arthroplasty devices capable of being placed posteriorally into the vertebral disc space. Various implementations of the invention are envisioned, including use in total spine arthroplasty replacing, via a posterior approach, both the disc and facet functions of a natural spinal joint.
As is known the art, in the human anatomy, the spine is a generally flexible column that can take tensile and compressive loads, allows bending motion and provides a place of attachment for ribs, muscles and ligaments. Generally, the spine is divided into three sections: the cervical, the thoracic and the lumbar spine.
These intervertebral discs function as shock absorbers and as joints. They are designed to absorb the compressive and tensile loads to which the spinal column may be subjected while at the same time allowing adjacent vertebral bodies to move relative to each other a limited amount, particularly during bending (flexure) of the spine. Thus, the intervertebral discs are under constant muscular and/or gravitational pressure and generally are the first parts of the lumbar spine to show signs of “wear and tear”.
Facet joint degeneration is also common because the facet joints are in almost constant motion with the spine. In fact, facet joint degeneration and disc degeneration frequently occur together. Generally, although one may be the primary problem while the other is a secondary problem resulting from the altered mechanics of the spine, by the time surgical options are considered, both facet joint degeneration and disc degeneration typically have occurred. For example, the altered mechanics of the facet joints and/or intervertebral disc may cause spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and degenerative scoliosis.
One surgical procedure for treating these conditions is spinal arthrodesis (i.e., spine fusion), which has been performed both anteriorally and/or posteriorally. The posterior procedures include in-situ fusion, posterior lateral instrumented fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (“TLIF”) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (“PLIF”). Solidly fusing a spinal segment to eliminate any motion at that level may alleviate the immediate symptoms, but for some patients maintaining motion may be advantageous. It is also known to surgically replace a degenerative disc or facet joint with an artificial disc or an artificial facet joint, respectively. However, none of the known devices or methods provide the advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Accordingly, the foregoing shows there is a need for an improved spinal arthroplasty that avoids the drawbacks and disadvantages of the known implants and surgical techniques.
In one embodiment, an artificial spinal joint for creating at least a portion of a coupling between a superior vertebra and an inferior vertebra comprises an articulating joint replacement assembly. The articulating joint replacement assembly comprises an anterior joint replacement component extending into an intervertebral disc space between the superior and inferior vertebrae, a first posterior joint replacement component, and a first bridge component coupled between the anterior joint replacement component and the first posterior joint replacement component. The artificial spinal joint further comprises a support joint replacement assembly. The support joint replacement assembly comprises an anterior support component extending into an intervertebral disc space between the superior and inferior vertebrae, a second posterior joint replacement component, and a second bridge component coupled between the anterior support component and the second posterior joint replacement component. The anterior support component is engaged with the articulating joint replacement component.
In another embodiment, a method of implanting an artificial spinal joint is provided. The method comprises creating a first exposure through a patient's back to access an intervertebral space, creating a second exposure through the patient's back to access the intervertebral space, delivering an articulating assembly portion of the artificial spinal joint to the intervertebral space along a first path through the first exposure, delivering a support assembly portion of the artificial spinal joint to the intervertebral space along a second path through the second exposure, and engaging the articulating assembly portion with the support assembly portion. In this embodiment, the first exposure is larger than the second exposure.
In another embodiment, a system for creating a coupling between a superior vertebra and an inferior vertebra, the system comprising an anterior articulating assembly for implantation through a transforaminal approach into an intervertebral disc space between the superior and inferior vertebrae and a first posterior articulating assembly connected to the anterior articulating assembly and extending posteriorly of the intervertebral disc space. The anterior articulating assembly comprises a caudal articulating surface engaged with a rostral articulating surface wherein the engagement of the caudal and rostral articulating surfaces defines a center of rotation. The center of rotation lies generally along a central anterior-posterior axis through the intervertebral disc space.
The embodiments disclosed may be useful for degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, post-traumatic, discogenic, facet pain or spondylolisthesis, and/or to maintain motion in multiple levels of the lumbar spine.
Additional and alternative features, advantages, uses and embodiments are set forth in or will be apparent from the following description, drawings, and claims.
The drawings illustrate various embodiments of an artificial intervertebral joint for replacing an intervertebral disc or the combination of an intervertebral disc and at least one corresponding facet joint. Various embodiments of the artificial intervertebral joint according to the principles of the disclosure may be used for treating any of the problems that lend themselves to joint replacement including particularly, for example, degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, post-traumatic, discogenic, facet pain or spondylolisthesis and/or to maintain motion in multiple levels of the lumbar spine.
Further, as illustrated in
The surfaces of the retaining portions 21a, 21b of the arthroplasty that contact the remaining end plates of the vertebrae may be coated with a beaded material or plasma sprayed to promote bony ingrowth and a firm connection therebetween. In particular, the surface to promote bone ingrowth may be a cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy with a titanium/calcium/phosphate double coating, a mesh surface, or any other effective surface finish. Alternatively or in combination, an adhesive or cement such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) may be used to fix all or a portion of the implants to one or both of the endplates.
As discussed in more detail below, a significant portion of the outer annulus region 17 (see, e.g.,
In the various embodiments of this disclosure, the first retaining portion 21a and the second retaining portion 21b are structured so as to retain the disc 19 therebetween. For example, in the case of a disc 19 with two convex surfaces 19a, each of the first retaining portion 21a and the second retaining portion 21b may have a concave surface 21c which defines a space within which the disc 19 may be retained. For example, in the exemplary embodiment shown in
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment of the disclosure, as illustrated best in
Regardless of whether artificial facet joints are provided, the respective upper and lower retaining portions associated with the left and right halves of the arthroplasty may be completely independent from the other. That is, as shown in
Further, in the various embodiments of the disclosure, the disc 19, the first retaining portion 21a and the second retaining portion 21b may be made of any appropriate material which will facilitate a connection that transmits compressive and tensile forces while providing for the aforementioned slidable motion in a generally transverse direction between each of the adjacent surfaces. For example, in the first embodiment, the first retaining portion 21a and the second retaining portion 21b may be typically made from any metal or metal alloy suitable for surgical implants such as stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt chromium, or composite materials such as carbon fiber, or a plastic material such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or any other suitable materials. The disc may be made from plastic such as high molecular weight polyethylene or PEEK, or from ceramics, metal, and natural or synthetic fibers such as, but not limited to, carbon fiber, rubber, or other suitable materials. Generally, to help maintain the sliding characteristic of the surfaces, the surfaces may be polished and/or coated to provide smooth surfaces. For example, if the surfaces are made of metal, the metal surfaces may be polished metal.
As shown in the various exemplary embodiments, other than the portions of the first and/or second retaining portions which may fit together like a lock and key to maintain the placement of the portions relative to each other, each half of the artificial intervertebral joint may be generally symmetrical about the midline 37 of the vertebrae.
Again, these exemplary embodiments are merely illustrative and are not meant to be an exhaustive list of all possible designs, implementations, modifications, and uses of the invention. Moreover, features described in connection with one embodiment of the disclosure may be used in conjunction with other embodiments, even if not explicitly stated above.
While it should be readily apparent to a skilled artisan from the discussion above, a brief description of a suitable surgical procedure that may be used to implant the artificial joint is provided below. Generally, as discussed above, the artificial intervertebral joint may be implanted into a body using a posterior transforaminal approach similar to the known TLIF or PLIF procedures. According to this approach, an incision, such as a midline incision, may be made in the patient's back and some or all of the affected disc and surrounding tissue may be removed via the foramina. Depending on whether any of the facet joints are being replaced, the natural facet joints may be trimmed to make room for the artificial facet joints. Then, the halves of the artificial intervertebral joint may be inserted piecewise through the left and right transforaminal openings, respectively. That is, the pieces of the artificial intervertebral joint including the upper and lower retaining portions, with or without facet components, and the artificial disc, if provided separately, fit through the foramina and are placed in the appropriate intervertebral space. The pieces of the artificial joint may be completely separated or two or more of them may be tied or packaged together prior to insertion through the foramina by cloth or other materials known in the art. In cases where at least a portion of the outer annulus of the natural disc can be retained, the lower retaining portions of each side of the artificial intervertebral joint are inserted such that they abut a corresponding portion of the annulus. If a midline anterior connection is provided, the left and right halves of the retaining members are fitted together and held in place by the outer annulus. As such, the remaining portion of the annulus may be in substantially the same place as it was prior to the procedure.
Further, in the cases where the annulus of the natural disc must be removed completely or this is insufficient annulus remaining, it is possible, for example, to use the embodiment of the disclosure where the pedicle screws are implemented so as to be assured that the pieces of the artificial intervertebral joint remain in place. It should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the artificial joint could be implanted via an anterior approach or a combined anterior and posterior approach, although the advantages of a posterior procedure would be limited. For example, some of the pieces of the artificial intervertebral joint may be inserted from an anterior approach and others posteriorly. The anteriorly and posteriorly placed portions could be fitted together similar to the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
The terms “rostral” and “caudal” are used in some embodiments to describe the position of components of the embodiments. While rostral is typically used in the art to describe positions toward the head and caudal is used to describe positions toward the tail or foot, as used herein, rostral and caudal are used simply as modifiers for the relative locations of components of the illustrated embodiments. For example, rostral components may be on one side of an illustrated joint, and caudal may be on another side of the joint. Components labeled as rostral or caudal to describe an illustrated embodiment are not intended to limit the orientation of a device or application of a method relative to a patient's anatomy, or to limit the scope of claims to any device or method.
In this embodiment, the rostral bridge 110 may include a jog 117 to create an exit portal and an artificial foramen for the exiting nerve root. Either of the bridges 110, 116, but particularly the caudal bridge 116, may be a “super” or artificial pedicle which may supplement or replace a natural pedicle. Also in this embodiment, the caudal anterior joint component 112 may include a caudal articulating surface such as a curved protrusion 118, and the caudal posterior joint component 114 may include a posterior articulating portion 120. The rostral anterior joint component 106 may include a rostral articulating surface such as an anterior socket 122 configured to receive the curved protrusion 118. A radius of curvature for the curved protrusion 118 may closely match the radius of curvature for the anterior socket 122 to create a highly constrained ball and socket type engagement. The engagement of the anterior socket 122 with the curved protrusion 118 may define a center of rotation 125. In an alternative embodiment, by increasing the radius of curvature for the socket relative to the radius of the curved protrusion, the curved protrusion may be permitted to translate within the socket.
The rostral posterior joint component 108 may include a posterior socket 124 configured to engage the posterior articulating portion 120. A radius of curvature for the posterior articulating portion 120 may be smaller than a radius of curvature for the posterior socket 124, thereby permitting motion and limiting binding between the posterior joint components 108, 114. The radii of curvature for the posterior socket 124 and the posterior articulating portion 120 may emanate from a common center of rotation for the arthroplasty half 102. In this embodiment, the radius of curvature for the posterior socket 124 is relatively large, and the resulting joint is loosely constrained. In an alternative embodiment, a tight radius of curvature for the posterior protrusion of the caudal posterior component matched with a rostral posterior component having a tight radius of curvature may create a tightly constrained posterior joint.
The arthroplasty half 104 may be a support joint replacement assembly and may include a rostral anterior support component 146, a rostral posterior joint component 148, and a rostral bridge 150 extending between the anterior component 146 and the posterior component 148. The rostral anterior component 146 may further include a concave wall 147. The arthroplasty half 104 may further include a caudal anterior support component 152, a caudal posterior joint component 154, and a caudal bridge 156 extending between the anterior component 152 and the posterior component 154. The caudal anterior component 152 may further include a concave wall 155. The rostral anterior support component 146 may include a bone contacting surface 146a and the caudal anterior support component 152 may include a bone contacting surface 152a.
In this embodiment, the rostral bridge 150 may include a jog 157 to create an exit portal and an artificial foramen for the exiting nerve root. Also in this embodiment, the caudal posterior joint component 154 may include a posterior articulating portion 160. The rostral posterior joint component 148 may include a posterior socket 162 configured to engage the posterior articulating portion 160. A radius of curvature for the posterior articulating portion 160 may be smaller than a radius of curvature for the posterior socket 162, thereby permitting motion and limiting binding between the posterior joint components 148, 154. The radii of curvature for the posterior socket 162 and the posterior articulating portion 160 may emanate from a common center of rotation for the arthroplasty half 104. In this embodiment, the radius of curvature for the posterior socket 162 is relatively large, and the resulting joint is loosely constrained. In an alternative embodiment, a tight radius of curvature for the posterior protrusion of the caudal posterior component matched with a rostral posterior component having a tight radius of curvature may create a tightly constrained posterior joint.
The size and shape of the anterior components 106, 112, 146, 152 and the bridge components 110, 116, 150, 156 may be limited by the constraints of a posterior or transforaminal surgical approach. For example, the anterior components 106, 112, 146, 152 may be configured to cover a maximum vertebral endplate area to dissipate loads and reduce subsidence while still fitting through the posterior surgical exposure, Kambin's triangle, and other neural elements. The width of the bridge components 110, 116, 150, 156 are also minimized to pass through Kambin's triangle and to co-exist with the neural elements.
The arthroplasty halves 102, 104 may further include features for securing to the vertebrae 7, 9. It is understood, however, that in an alternative embodiment, the fixation features may be eliminated. The arthroplasty half 104 may include fixation features substantially similar to arthroplasty half 102 and therefore will not be described in detail. The arthroplasty half 102 may include a connection component 170 extending rostrally from the rostral anterior joint component 106. The connection component 170 in this embodiment includes an aperture adapted to receive a bone fastener such as a screw 172. The orientation of the connection component 170 permits interbody fixation of the screw 172 to the cylindrical vertebral body 7a.
Arthroplasty half 102 may further include a connection component 174 attached to or integrally formed with the caudal posterior joint component 114. The connection component 174 in this embodiment includes an aperture adapted to receive a bone fastener such as a screw 176. The orientation of the connection component 174 permits the screw 176 to become inserted extrapedicularly such that the screw travels a path angled or skewed away from a central axis defined through a pedicle. In this embodiment, the screw passes through a wall of the pedicle and may achieve strong cortical fixation. Extrapedicular fixation may be any fixation into the pedicle that does not follow a path down an axis defined generally posterior-anterior through the pedicle. The bone fasteners 172, 176 may be recessed so as not to interfere with articulations, soft tissues, and neural structures.
In an alternative embodiment, a connection component extending from the posterior component may be oriented to permit the screw to become inserted intrapedicularly down an axis defined generally posterior-anterior through a pedicle. It is understood that in other alternative embodiments, the connection components may extend at a variety of angles, in a variety of directions from the various components of the arthroplasty half. For example, a connection component may extend from the rostral bridge rather than the rostral anterior joint component.
As shown in
The arthroplasty halves 102, 104 may be formed of any suitable biocompatible material including metals such as cobalt-chromium alloys, titanium alloys, nickel titanium alloys, and/or stainless steel alloys. Ceramic materials such as aluminum oxide or alumnia, zirconium oxide or zirconia, compact of particulate diamond, and/or pyrolytic carbon may also be suitable. Polymer materials may also be used, including any member of the polyaryletherketone (PAEK) family such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK), carbon-reinforced PEEK, or polyetherketoneketone (PEKK); polysulfone; polyetherimide; polyimide; ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); and/or cross-linked UHMWPE. The various components comprising the arthroplasty halves 102, 104 may be formed of different materials thus permitting metal on metal, metal on ceramic, metal on polymer, ceramic on ceramic, ceramic on polymer, or polymer on polymer constructions.
Bone contacting surfaces of the arthroplasty halves 102, 104 may include features or coatings which enhance the fixation of the implanted prosthesis. For example, the surfaces may be roughened such as by chemical etching, bead-blasting, sanding, grinding, serrating, and/or diamond-cutting. All or a portion of the bone contacting surfaces of the arthroplasty halves 102, 104 may also be coated with a biocompatible and osteoconductive material such as hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and/or calcium carbonate to promote bone in growth and fixation. Alternatively, osteoinductive coatings, such as proteins from transforming growth factor (TGF) beta superfamily, or bone-morphogenic proteins, such as BMP2 or BMP7, may be used. Other suitable features may include spikes, ridges, and/or other surface textures.
The artificial intervertebral joint 100 may be installed between the vertebrae 7, 9 as will be described below. Generally, the artificial intervertebral joint 100 may be implanted into a body using a posterior transforaminal approach similar to the known TLIF or PLIF procedures. PLIF approaches are generally more medial and rely on more retraction of the traversing root and dura to access the vertebral interspace. The space between these structures is known as Kambin's triangle. TLIF approaches are typically more oblique, requiring less retraction of the exiting root, and less epidural bleeding with less retraction of the traversing structures. It is also possible to access the interspace using a far lateral approach, above the position of the exiting nerve root and outside of Kambin's triangle. In some instances it is possible to access the interspace via the far lateral without resecting the facets. Furthermore, a direct lateral approach through the psoas is known. This approach avoids the posterior neural elements completely. Embodiments of the current invention are anticipate that could utilize any of these common approaches.
According to at least one of these approaches, an incision, such as a midline incision, may be made in the patient's back and some or all of the affected disc and surrounding tissue may be removed via the foramina. The superior endplate surface of the vertebra 9 may be milled, rasped, or otherwise resected to match the profile of the caudal anterior bone contacting surface 112a, to normalize stress distributions on the superior endplate surface of the vertebra 9, and/or to provide initial fixation prior to bone ingrowth. The preparation of the endplate of vertebra 9 may result in a flattened surface or in surface contours such as pockets, grooves, or other contours that may match corresponding features on the bone contacting surface 112a. The inferior endplate of the vertebra 7 may be similarly prepared to receive the rostral anterior joint component 106 to the extent allowed by the exiting nerve root and the dorsal root ganglia. Depending on whether any of the facet joints are being replaced, the natural facet joints of vertebrae 7, 9 may be trimmed to make room for the posterior components 108, 114.
The articulating joint replacement assembly 102 of the artificial intervertebral joint 100 may then be inserted piecewise through, for example, the left transforaminal exposure. That is, the pieces of the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 including the rostral and caudal anterior joint components 106, 112 respectively are fit through the foramina and are placed in the appropriate intervertebral disc space between the generally cylindrical bodies 7a, 9a. The anterior joint components 106, 112 may be delivered along a curved path similar to that used in a “kidney bean” TLIF graft. Within the intervertebral disc space, the anterior joint components 106, 112 may be positioned such that the anterior socket 122 is engaged with the curved protrusion 118 and the center of rotation 125 may be positioned to lie generally along a laterally centralized anterior-posterior axis 127 through the intervertebral disc space. During insertion, the pieces of the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 may be completely separated or two or more of them may be tied or packaged together prior to insertion through the foramina by cloth or other materials known in the art. In cases where at least a portion of the outer annulus of the natural disc can be retained, the caudal anterior joint components may be inserted such that they abut a corresponding portion of the annulus.
As described, the anterior articulation provided by the anterior socket 122 engaged with the curved protrusion 118 may be completed with unilateral delivery. If the support joint replacement assembly 104 cannnot be inserted or it becomes desirable to use only a single lateralized half, the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 may function on its own. When the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 is used alone, the center of rotation 125 may be positioned along the axis 127, however, in alternative embodiments, the center of rotation may be positioned to one side of the axis 127. This type of intentional lateralization of the anterior articulation may create a wedge effect that may be desired to correct scoliosis or other pathologic conditions that require balance correction. In circumstances in which both the articulating and support joint replacement assemblies are installed, scoliosis and similar pathologic conditions may be remedied by using anterior components of different heights and shapes. In this way, the articulating joint replacement assembly may act as a wedge, creating a different intervertebral height than the support joint replacement assembly.
The bridges 110, 116 may extend posteriorly from the anterior joint components 106, 112, respectively and posteriorly from the intervertebral disc space. The posterior components 108, 114 may be positioned posteriorly of the intervertebral disc space with the posterior socket 124 engaged with the posterior articulating portion 120. These posterior components 108, 114 may replace or supplement the function of the natural facet joints.
The support joint replacement assembly 104 of the artificial intervertebral joint 100 may then be inserted piecewise through a contralateral exposure, for example, a right transforaminal exposure. That is, the pieces of the articulating joint replacement assembly 104 including the rostral and caudal anterior support components 146, 152 respectively fit through the contralateral foramina and are placed in the appropriate intervertebral disc space between the generally cylindrical bodies 7a, 9a. Because the support joint replacement assembly 104 may omit any articulating surfaces, it may require less clearance than the articulating joint replacement assembly 102. Thus, the minimum clearance needed to insert the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 may be smaller than the minimum clearance needed to insert the support joint replacement assembly 104, and consequently, the right transforaminal exposure may be smaller than the left transforaminal exposure. The anterior support components 146, 152 may also be delivered along a curved path similar to that used in a “kidney bean” TLIF graft or any other path that accommodates the shape of the components. The pieces of the support joint replacement assembly 104 may be completely separated or two or more of them may be tied or packaged together prior to insertion through the foramina by cloth or other materials known in the art. Within the intervertebral disc space, the anterior support components 146, 152 may be connected to the anterior joint components 106, 112, respectively. In this embodiment, the convex wall 115 of the caudal anterior joint component 112 may be placed into engagement with the concave wall 155 of the caudal anterior support component 152. The rostral anterior joint component 106 may be similarly positioned with respect to the rostral anterior support component 146. The anterior support components 146, 152 may serve to locate and maintain the center of rotation 125 of the anterior articulating components 106, 112 in a generally central position within the intervertebral disc space and may also serve to provide additional subsidence-limiting surface area in the anterior column. In this embodiment, pivoting, sliding, or rotational movement may be permitted at the interface between the convex wall 115 and the concave wall 155 or at the interface between the convex wall 107 and the concave wall 147.
In an alternative embodiment, only the rostral joint and support components may be connected. In another alternative embodiment, only the caudal joint and support components may be connected. In another alternative, the contralateral exposure may be abandoned if problems occur during the surgery. Thus, the arthroplasty may be completed with the unilateral delivery of only the articulating joint replacement assembly.
The bridges 150, 156 may extend posteriorly from the anterior joint components 146, 152 and posteriorly from the intervertebral disc space. The posterior components 148, 154 may be positioned posteriorly of the intervertebral disc space with the posterior socket 162 engaged with the posterior articulating portion 160. These posterior components 148, 154 may replace or supplement the function of the natural facet joints.
After installation, the articulating joint replacement assembly 102 and the support joint replacement assembly 104 may be secured to vertebrae 7, 9. The screw 172 may be inserted through the connection component 170 and into the generally cylindrical body 7a. The screw 176 may be inserted through the connection component 174 and may be affixed extrapedicularly to the vertebra 9, for example, the screw 176 may pass through a lateral wall of the pedicle to achieve strong cortical fixation. Corresponding fasteners may be used to secure the support joint replacement assembly 104. It is understood that the screws may be implanted either after the entire arthroplasty half has been implanted or after each of the rostral and caudal component has been implanted.
As installed, the anterior ball and socket type joint created by the rostral anterior joint component 106 and the caudal anterior joint component 112 may be relatively stable and self-centering. Both the anterior and the posterior joints allow the arthroplasty half 102 to resist shear forces, particularly anterior-posterior forces. Movement of the rostral anterior joint component 106 relative to the caudal anterior joint component 112 may be limited by the displacement of the posterior articulating portion 120 within the posterior socket 124. For example, lateral translation of the rostral anterior joint component 106 relative to the caudal anterior joint component 112 may be limited by the posterior joint. Rotational motion about a longitudinal axis defined by the cylindrical bodies 7a, 9a may be limited both by the constraint in the posterior joint and by the combined constraint provided by the two arthroplasty halves 102, 104. Further, the posterior joint may restrict any true lateral bending degree of freedom.
Pure freedom of motion may be limited to flexion-extension motion about an axis defined through the anterior joint of the articulating joint replacement assembly 102. However, under certain conditions, the joint 100 may overcome these design restrictions to permit limited lateral, rotational, and coupled movements. For example, the anterior joint components 106, 112 may become disconnected from each other and experience limited “lift-off,” thereby permitting additional degrees of freedom and coupled motions beyond strict flexion-extension motion. The self-centering nature of the anterior joint may encourage reconnection and alignment after lift-off occurs. The limited disconnection of the anterior joint components 106, 112 may be accommodated by the degree of constraint in the posterior joint. For example, relatively loose constraint in the posterior joint permits greater amounts of lift-off. Some degree of constraint in the posterior joint may be useful, however, to encourage reconnection and alignment of the anterior joint.
In general, a simple, anteriorly located ball and socket joint which is tightly constrained with each component having the same or similar radii of curvature may allow flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion motions while resisting shear forces and limiting translation. By adding an additional highly constrained ball and socket joint to the posterior components, an additional degree of freedom may be limited, such as torsion. Additional joints may further limit degrees of freedom of motion. If the anterior or posterior joints are permitted to disconnect or disarticulate additional degrees of freedom may be permitted as described above. Changing the shape of or clearance between the ball and socket components will also permit additional degrees of motion.
The robust and forgiving structure of the anterior and posterior joints also permits misalignment and slight inaccuracy in the placement of the arthroplasty halves 102, 104. For example, the self-aligning ball and socket structure of the anterior joint components 106, 112 tolerates a certain amount of misalignment between the components. Thus, the insertion trajectories for the components 106, 112 may be slightly misaligned. The interaction of the posterior protrusion 120 and the posterior socket 124 may also accommodate parallel misalignment and/or anterior-posterior misalignment between the arthroplasty halves 102, 104.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In an alternative embodiment, any of the artificial intervertebral joints described above may further include a rostral keel extending from the rostral anterior component and/or a caudal keel extending from the caudal anterior joint component and along the caudal bridge. The rostral keel may engage the inferior endplate of the vertebral body 7a, and the caudal keel may engage the superior endplate of the vertebral body 9a and a superior face of a pedicle of vertebra 9. It is understood that the inferior endplate of the body 7a may be milled or otherwise prepared to receive the rostral keel. Likewise, the superior endplate of the body 9a and the pedicle of vertebra 9 may be milled, chiseled, or otherwise prepared to create a channel for receiving the caudal keel. The keels may help to connect to the bone and limit movement of the arthroplasty half to the desired degrees to freedom. The keels may have an angled or semi-cylindrical cross section. It is understood that more than one keel may be used on any given component.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this disclosure. Accordingly, all such modifications and alternative are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such modifications and equivalent constructions or methods do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and that they may make various changes, substitutions, and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. It is understood that all spatial references, such as “horizontal,” “vertical,” “top,” “upper,” “lower,” “bottom,” “left,” and “right,” are for illustrative purposes only and can be varied within the scope of the disclosure. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/534,960 filed on Jan. 9, 2004, entitled “Posterior Lumbar Arthroplasty.” The following applications also claim priority to the above referenced provisional application and are related to the present application. They are incorporated by reference herein. U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. PC1146), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Spinal Arthroplasty Device and Method;” U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21769), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Dual Articulating Spinal Device and Method;” U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21756), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Split Spinal Device and Method;” U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21752), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Interconnected Spinal Device and Method;” U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21745), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Mobile Bearing Spinal Device and Method;” U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21743), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Support Structure Device and Method;” and U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. (Attorney Docket No. P21751), filed on Jan. 7, 2005 and entitled “Posterior Spinal Device and Method.”
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60534960 | Jan 2004 | US |
