This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Centrifugal compressors may be employed to provide a pressurized flow of fluid for various applications. Such compressors typically include an impeller that is driven to rotate by an electric motor, an internal combustion engine, or another drive unit configured to provide a rotational output. As the impeller rotates, fluid entering in an axial direction is accelerated and expelled in a circumferential and a radial direction. The high-velocity fluid then enters a diffuser which converts the velocity head into a pressure head (i.e., decreases flow velocity and increases flow pressure). In this manner, the centrifugal compressor produces a high-pressure fluid output. Unfortunately, there is a tradeoff between performance and efficiency in existing diffusers.
Various features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying figures in which like characters represent like parts throughout the figures, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. These described embodiments are only exemplary of the present invention. Additionally, in an effort to provide a concise description of these exemplary embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
In certain configurations, a diffuser includes a series of vanes configured to enhance diffuser efficiency. Certain diffusers may include three-dimensional airfoil-type vanes or two-dimensional cascade-type vanes. The airfoil-type vanes provide a greater maximum efficiency, but decreased performance within surge flow and choked flow regimes. In contrast, cascade-type vanes provide enhanced surge flow and choked flow performance, but result in decreased maximum efficiency compared to airfoil-type vanes.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may increase diffuser efficiency and reduce surge flow and choked flow losses by employing three-dimensional non-airfoil diffuser vanes particularly configured to match flow variations from an impeller. In certain embodiments, each diffuser vane includes a tapered leading edge, a tapered trailing edge and a constant thickness section extending between the leading edge and the trailing edge. A length of the constant thickness section may be greater than approximately 50% of a chord length of the diffuser vane. A radius of curvature of the leading edge, a radius of curvature of the trailing edge, and the chord length may be configured to vary along a span of the diffuser vane. In this manner, the diffuser vane may be particularly adjusted to compensate for axial flow variations from the impeller. In further configurations, a camber angle of the diffuser vane may also be configured to vary along the span. Other embodiments may enable a circumferential position of the leading edge and/or the trailing edge of the diffuser vane to vary along the span of the vane. Such adjustment may facilitate a non-airfoil vane configuration that is adjusted to coincide with the flow properties of a particular impeller, thereby increasing efficiency and decreasing surge flow and choked flow losses.
In the present embodiment, the diffuser 16 includes diffuser vanes 18 coupled to a hub 20 in an annular configuration. The vanes 18 are configured to increase diffuser efficiency. As discussed in detail below, each vane 18 includes a leading edge section, a trailing edge section and a constant thickness section extending between the leading edge section and the trailing edge section, thereby forming a non-airfoil vane 18. Properties of the vane 18 are configured to establish a three-dimensional arrangement that particularly matches the fluid flow expelled from the impeller 12. By contouring the three-dimensional non-airfoil vane 18 to coincide with impeller exit flow, efficiency of the diffuser 16 may be increased compared to two-dimensional cascade diffusers. In addition, surge flow and choked flow losses may be reduced compared to three-dimensional airfoil-type diffusers.
As illustrated, fluid flow 30 exits the impeller in both the circumferential direction 28 and a radial direction 32. Specifically, the fluid flow 30 is oriented at an angle 34 with respect to the circumferential axis 28. As will be appreciated, the angle 34 may vary based on impeller configuration, impeller rotation speed, and/or flow rate through the compressor 10, among other factors. In the present configuration, the angle 26 of the vanes 18 is particularly configured to match the direction of fluid flow 30 from the impeller 12. As will be appreciated, a difference between the leading edge angle 26 and the fluid flow angle 34 may be defined as an incidence angle. The vanes 18 of the present embodiment are configured to substantially reduce the incidence angle, thereby increasing the efficiency of the centrifugal compressor 10.
As previously discussed, the vanes 18 are disposed about the hub 20 in a substantially annular arrangement. A spacing 36 between vanes 18 along the circumferential direction 28 may be configured to provide efficient conversion of the velocity head to pressure head. In the present configuration, the spacing 36 between vanes 18 is substantially equal. However, alternative embodiments may employ uneven blade spacing.
Each vane 18 includes a pressure surface 38 and a suction surface 40. As will be appreciated, as the fluid flows from the leading edge 22 to the trailing edge 24, a high pressure region is induced adjacent to the pressure surface 38 and a lower pressure region is induced adjacent to the suction surface 40. These pressure regions affect the flow field from the impeller 12, thereby increasing flow stability and efficiency compared to vaneless diffusers. In the present embodiment, each three-dimensional non-airfoil vane 18 is particularly configured to match the flow properties of the impeller 12, thereby providing increased efficiency and decreased losses within the surge flow and choked flow regimes.
In addition, a circumferential position (i.e., position along the circumferential direction 28) of the leading edge 22 and/or trailing edge 24 may be configured to vary along the span 44 of the vane 18. As illustrated, a reference line 54 extends from the leading edge 22 of the vane tip 46 to the hub 20 along the axial direction 42. The circumferential position of the leading edge 22 along the span 44 is offset from the reference line 54 by a variable distance 56. In other words, the leading edge 22 is variable rather than constant in the circumferential direction 28. This configuration establishes a variable distance between the impeller 12 and the leading edge 22 of the vane 18 along the span 44. For example, based on computer simulation of fluid flow from the impeller 12, a particular distance 56 may be selected for each axial position along the span 44. In this manner, efficiency of the vane 18 may be increased compared to configurations employing a constant distance 56. In the present embodiment, the distance 56 increases as distance from the vane tip 46 increases. Alternative embodiments may employ other leading edge profiles, including arrangements in which the leading edge 22 extends past the reference line 54 along a direction toward the impeller 12.
Similarly, a circumferential position of the trailing edge 24 may be configured to vary along the span 44 of the vane 18. As illustrated, a reference line 58 extends from the trailing edge 24 of the vane root 48 away from the hub 20 along the axial direction 42. The circumferential position of the trailing edge 24 along the span 44 is offset from the reference line 58 by a variable distance 60. In other words, the trailing edge 24 is variable rather than constant in the circumferential direction 28. This configuration establishes a variable distance between the impeller 12 and the trailing edge 24 of the vane 18 along the span 44. For example, based on computer simulation of fluid flow from the impeller 12, a particular distance 60 may be selected for each axial position along the span 44. In this manner, efficiency of the vane 18 may be increased compared to configurations employing a constant distance 60. In the present embodiment, the distance 60 increases as distance from the vane root 48 increases. Alternative embodiments may employ other trailing edge profiles, including arrangements in which the trailing edge 24 extends past the reference line 58 along a direction away from the impeller 12. In further embodiments, a radial position of the leading edge 22 and/or a radial position of the trailing edge 24 may vary along the span 44 of the diffuser vane 18.
For example, as previously discussed, the chord length for an axial position (i.e., position along the axial direction 42) of the vane 18 may be selected based on the flow properties at that axial location. As illustrated, the chord length 50 of the vane tip 46 may be configured based on the flow from the impeller 12 at the tip 46 of the vane 18. Similarly, a length 70 of the tapered leading edge section 62 may be selected based on the flow properties at the corresponding axial location. As illustrated, the tapered leading edge section 62 establishes a converging geometry between the constant thickness section 64 and the leading edge 22. As will be appreciated, for a given thickness 68 of a base 71 of the tapered leading edge section 62, the length 70 may define a slope between the leading edge 22 and the constant thickness section 64. For example, a longer leading edge section 62 may provide a more gradual transition from the leading edge 22 to the constant thickness section 64, while a shorter section 62 may provide a more abrupt transition.
In addition, a length 72 of the constant thickness section 64 and a length 74 of the tapered trailing edge section 66 may be selected based on flow properties at a particular axial position. Similar to the leading edge section 62, the length 74 of the trailing edge section 66 may define a slope between the trailing edge 24 and a base 75. In other words, adjusting the length 74 of the trailing edge section 66 may provide desired flow properties around the trailing edge 24. As illustrated, the tapered trailing edge section 66 establishes a converging geometry between the constant thickness section 64 and the trailing edge 24. The length 72 of the constant thickness section 64 may result from selecting a desired chord length 50, a desired leading edge section length 70 and a desired trailing edge section length 74. Specifically, the remainder of the chord length 50 after the lengths 70 and 74 have been selected defines the length 72 of the constant thickness section 64. In certain configurations, the length 72 of the constant thickness section 64 may be greater than approximately 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, or more of the chord length 50. As discussed in detail below, a ratio between the length 72 of the constant thickness section 64 and the chord length 50 may be substantially equal for each cross-sectional profile throughout the span 44.
Furthermore, the leading edge 22 and/or the trailing edge 24 may include a curved profile at the tip of the tapered leading edge section 62 and/or the tapered trailing edge section 66. Specifically, a tip of the leading edge 22 may include a curved profile having a radius of curvature 76 configured to direct fluid flow around the leading edge 22. As will be appreciated, the radius of curvature 76 may affect the slope of the tapered leading edge section 62. For example, for a given length 70, a larger radius of curvature 76 may establish a smaller slope between the leading edge 22 and the base 71, while a smaller radius of curvature 76 may establish a larger slope. Similarly, a radius of curvature 78 of a tip of the trailing edge 24 may be selected based on computed flow properties at the trailing edge 24. In certain configurations, the radius of curvature 76 of the leading edge 22 may be larger than the radius of curvature 78 of the trailing edge 24. Consequently, the length 74 of the tapered trailing edge section 66 may be larger than the length 70 of the tapered leading edge section 62.
Another vane property that may affect fluid flow through the diffuser 16 is the camber of the vane 18. As illustrated, a camber line 80 extends from the leading edge 22 to the trailing edge 24 and defines the center of the vane profile (i.e., the center line between the pressure surface 38 and the suction surface 40). The camber line 80 illustrates the curved profile of the vane 18. Specifically, a leading edge camber tangent line 82 extends from the leading edge 22 and is tangent to the camber line 80 at the leading edge 22. Similarly, a trailing edge camber tangent line 84 extends from the trailing edge 24 and is tangent to the camber line 80 at the trailing edge 24. A camber angle 86 is formed at the intersection between the tangent line 82 and tangent line 84. As illustrated, the larger the curvature of the vane 18, the larger the camber angle 86. Therefore, the camber angle 86 provides an effective measurement of the curvature or camber of the vane 18. The camber angle 86 may be selected to provide an efficient conversion from dynamic head to pressure head based on flow properties from the impeller 12. For example, the camber angle 86 may be greater than approximately 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, or more degrees.
The camber angle 86, the radius of curvature 76 of the leading edge 22, the radius of curvature 78 of the trailing edge 24, the length 70 of the tapered leading edge section 62, the length 72 of the constant thickness section 64, the length 74 of the tapered trailing edge section 66, and/or the chord length 50 may vary along the span 44 of the vane 18. Specifically, each of the above parameters may be particularly selected for each axial cross section based on computed flow properties at the corresponding axial location. In this manner, a three-dimensional vane 18 (i.e., a vane 18 having variable cross section geometry) may be constructed that provides increased efficiency compared to a two-dimensional vane (i.e., a vane having a constant cross section geometry). In addition, as discussed in detail below, the diffuser 16 employing such vanes 18 may maintain efficiency throughout a wide range of operating flow rates.
Similarly, a radius of curvature 96 of the leading edge 22, a radius of curvature 98 of the trailing edge 24, and/or the camber angle 100 may vary between the illustrated section and the section shown in
In certain embodiments, the profile of each axial section may be selected based on a two-dimensional transformation of an axial flat plate to a radial flow configuration. Such a technique may involve performing a conformal transformation of a rectilinear flat plate profile in a rectangular coordinate system into a radial plane of a curvilinear coordinate system, while assuming that the flow is uniform and aligned within the original rectangular coordinate system. In the transformed coordinate system, the flow represents a logarithmic spiral vortex. If the leading edge 22 and trailing edge 24 of the diffuser vane 18 are situated on the same logarithmic spiral curve, the diffuser vane 18 performs no turning of the flow. The desired turning of the flow may be controlled by selecting a suitable camber angle. The initial assumption of flow uniformity in the rectangular coordinate system may be modified to involve an actual non-uniform flow field emanating from the impeller 12, thereby improving accuracy of the calculations. Using this technique, a radius of curvature of the leading edge, a radius of curvature of the trailing edge, and/or the camber angle, among other parameters, may be selected, thereby increasing efficiency of the vane 18.
As will be appreciated, configuring vanes 18 for efficient operation includes both increasing efficiency within the efficient operating region 138 and decreasing losses within the surge flow region 136 and the choked flow region 140. As previously discussed, three-dimensional airfoil-type vanes provide high efficiency within the efficient operating region, but decreased performance within the surge and choked flow regions. Conversely, two-dimensional cascade-type diffusers provide decreased losses within the surge flow and choked flow regions, but have reduced efficiency within the efficient operating region. The present embodiment, by contouring each vane 18 to match the flow properties of the impeller 12 and including a constant thickness section 64, may provide increased efficiency within the efficient operating region 138 and decreased losses with the surge flow and choked flow regions 136 and 140. For example, in certain embodiments, the present vane configuration may provide substantially equivalent surge flow and choked flow performance as a two-dimensional cascade-type diffuser, while increasing efficiency within the efficient operating region by approximately 1.5%.
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/226,732, entitled “Centrifugal Compressor Diffuser”, filed on Jul. 19, 2009, and which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US10/42474 | 7/19/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/19/2012 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61226732 | Jul 2009 | US |