The present disclosure relates to a centrifugal compressor impeller.
Conventionally, as technology of this field, a centrifugal compressor impeller set forth in Patent Literature 1 below is known. Patent Literature 1 describes that the impeller is made by injection molding.
[Patent Literature 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2014-238084
In general, since the centrifugal compressor impeller has blades, each of which includes a complicated curved surface, mold release is problematic when the impeller is made by injection molding. That is, in the case of molds for forming the blades, there is a need to avoid interference between each blade and the mold in the event of the mold release. Therefore, if a shape of the blade is complicated, there is a need to divide the molds into numerous molds, to enable them to be released, and the productivity becomes worse. On the other hand, releasing the molds in a direction of a rotation axis of the impeller can also be considered. However, in the impeller in which the molds can be released in the direction of the rotation axis, the shape of the blade is greatly restricted, and thus there is no choice but to simplify the shape of the blade. As a result, there is no choice but to sacrifice the performance of the impeller.
The present disclosure describes a centrifugal compressor impeller that improves productivity by means of injection molding while suppressing a reduction in performance.
A centrifugal compressor impeller according to an aspect of the present disclosure includes: a hub; a plurality of full blades that are arranged on the hub in a circumferential direction of rotation; and splitter blades provided between the full blades. There is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to a virtual plane perpendicular to a rotation axis and in which an entire suction surface of the full blade adjacent to a front side of the splitter blade in a rotational direction, an entire pressure surface of the full blade adjacent to a rear side of the splitter blade in the rotational direction, and an entire surface of the splitter blade are visible.
According to the centrifugal compressor impeller of the present disclosure, it is possible to improve productivity by means of injection molding while suppressing a reduction in performance.
A centrifugal compressor impeller according to an aspect of the present disclosure includes: a hub; a plurality of full blades that are arranged on the hub in a circumferential direction of rotation; and splitter blades provided between the full blades. There is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to a virtual plane perpendicular to a rotation axis and in which an entire suction surface of the full blade adjacent to a front side of the splitter blade in a rotational direction, an entire pressure surface of the full blade adjacent to a rear side of the splitter blade in the rotational direction, and an entire surface of the splitter blade are visible.
A centrifugal compressor impeller of the present disclosure includes: a hub; a plurality of full blades that are arranged on the hub in a circumferential direction of rotation; and splitter blades provided between the full blades. There is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to a virtual plane perpendicular to a rotation axis and in which an entire surface of the splitter blade is visible. When the sum of the number of full blades and the number of splitter blades is defined as N, an opening angle of the full blade is defined as α, and an opening angle of the splitter blade is defined as β, α≤(360°/N)+β.
A centrifugal compressor impeller of the present disclosure includes: a hub; and a plurality of full blades that are arranged on the hub in a circumferential direction of rotation. There is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to a virtual plane perpendicular to a rotation axis and in which an entire suction surface of one full blade and an entire pressure surface of another full blade adjacent to the suction surface are visible.
Hereinafter, a centrifugal compressor impeller 1 (hereinafter referred to simply as an “impeller 1”) according to an embodiment of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
An impeller 1 illustrated in
Here, attention is paid to one splitter blade 7 of the impeller 1 and two full blades 5 between which this splitter blade 7 is sandwiched in the circumferential direction of rotation. The splitter blade 7 to which attention is paid will be called a “splitter blade 7A.” The full blade 5 adjacent to a front side of the splitter blade 7A in a rotational direction will be called a “full blade 5A.” The full blade 5 adjacent to a rear side of the splitter blade 7A in the rotational direction will be called a “full blade 5B.” In addition, a virtual plane perpendicular to the rotation axis C will be referred to as a virtual plane S.
In the impeller 1, there is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to the virtual plane S and in which an entire suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A, an entire pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B, and an entire surface of the splitter blade 7A are visible. A suction surface 13, pressure surface 14, leading edge and trailing edge of the splitter blade 7A are included in the surface of the splitter blade 7A. The line-of-sight direction is a direction of an outlet blade angle of the splitter blade 7A.
In contrast, when the impeller 1 is viewed with a line of sight parallel to the rotation axis C, at least a part of the suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A, the pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B, and the surface of the splitter blade 7A is not visible.
Here, the wording “an entire certain surface T on the impeller 1 is visible” means that all points on the surface T are visible in whole without being hidden by other parts on a surface of the impeller 1. In this case, even when there is a set of points that appear to overlap on the surface T, this is included in a state in which “the entire surface T is visible.”
The condition described above that “in the impeller 1, there is a line-of-sight direction which is a direction parallel to the virtual plane S and in which an entire suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A and an entire pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B are visible” will be considered. If the condition is satisfied, when the sum of the number of full blades 5 and the number of splitter blades 7 of the impeller 1 is defined as N, an opening angle of the full blade 5 is defined as α, and an opening angle of the splitter blade 7 is defined as β, α≤(360°/N)+β is required.
Here, the definition of the opening angle of the blade of the impeller will be described with reference to
In
a point C indicates a rotation axis of the impeller 201,
a point A indicates an end close to a hub on a leading edge of the full blade 105,
a point D indicates an end close to a hub on a trailing edge of the full blade 105,
a point E indicates an end close to a hub on a leading edge of the splitter blade 107, and
a point F indicates an end close to a hub on a trailing edge of the splitter blade 107.
As illustrated in
Next, operation and effects caused by the impeller 1 will be described. As described above, there is a line-of-sight direction which is the direction parallel to the virtual plane S and in which the entire suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A, the entire pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B, and the entire surface of the splitter blade 7A are visible in the impeller 1. Therefore, even when injection molds for forming the suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A, the pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B, and the splitter blade 7A are integrated, the molds can be released in the line-of-sight direction (the direction of the outlet blade angle of the splitter blade 7A). That is, in
Therefore, in the injection molding of the impeller 1, molds can be allocated between the full blades 5 one by one. All the full blades 5 and splitter blades 7 can be formed by molds of the same number (six) as the full blades 5. In this case, each mold is displaced and released along a linear track in the direction parallel to the virtual plane S. That is, six full blades 5 and six splitter blades 7 of the impeller 1 can be formed by a relatively small number of molds having the same number (six) as the number of full blades 5. When the molds are released, each mold may be displaced along the linear track in the direction parallel to the virtual plane S. Therefore, the productivity of the impeller 1 is improved by injection molding.
The impeller 1 has a shape in which the molds for forming the full blades 5 and the splitter blades 7 are released in the direction parallel to the virtual plane S. Therefore, in comparison with an impeller that allows the molds to be released in the direction of the rotation axis C, it is not necessary to extremely simplify shapes of the full blades 5 and the splitter blades 7, and a reduction in performance of the impeller 1 can be suppressed.
As described above, when the impeller 1 is viewed with a line of sight parallel to the rotation axis C, at least a part of the suction surface 11 of the full blade 5A, the pressure surface 12 of the full blade 5B, and the surface of the splitter blade 7A is not visible. Therefore, there is no injection mold by which the full blades 5 and splitter blades 7 of the impeller 1 can be integrally formed and in which the molds can be released in the direction of the rotation axis C.
Hereinafter, results of CFD analysis performed by the inventors with regard to the performance of the impeller 1 will be described.
The inventors prepared models M1 and M2 of the impeller to perform CFD analysis. The impeller of the model M1 includes full blades and splitter blades having complicated shapes without satisfying the conditions of the impeller 1. The impeller of the model M2 includes full blades and splitter blades having such simple shapes as to be able to be manufactured by molds that can be released in the direction of the rotation axis C. Results of the CFD analysis are shown in
Further, the inventors prepared models M1′ and M3 of the impeller to perform CFD analysis. Like the model M1, the impeller of the model M1′ includes full blades and splitter blades having complicated shapes without satisfying the conditions of the impeller 1. The impeller of the model M3 satisfies the conditions of the aforementioned impeller 1. Results of the CFD analysis are shown in
A centrifugal compressor impeller 71 illustrated in
The present disclosure can be carried out in various modes subjected to various alterations and improvements on the basis of knowledge of those skilled in the art, starting with the aforementioned embodiments. A modification can also be configured using the technical matters set forth in the aforementioned embodiments. The configurations of the embodiments may be appropriately combined and used. For example, in the first embodiment, the impeller 1 having the six full blades 5 and the six splitter blades 7 has been described by way of example. However, the present disclosure can also be equally applied to an impeller that includes a different number of full blades and splitter blades. In the second embodiment, the impeller 71 having the six full blades 75 has been described by way of example. However, the present disclosure can also be equally applied to an impeller that includes a different number of full blades.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2016-093985 | May 2016 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2017/014515 | 4/7/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/195512 | 11/16/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4093401 | Gravelle | Jun 1978 | A |
6754954 | Decker | Jun 2004 | B1 |
8007241 | Vadillo | Aug 2011 | B2 |
9689263 | Gharaibah | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20020185244 | Decker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187060 | Decker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040052644 | Decker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062645 | Decker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070031261 | Lombard | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080289332 | Decker et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090136357 | Vadillo | May 2009 | A1 |
20090252609 | Kubota | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274560 | Kubota et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20120294739 | Nishimura et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140328689 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150063989 | Wang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150176422 | Dimova et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101010157 | Aug 2007 | CN |
102720692 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102762873 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103890408 | Jun 2014 | CN |
104364493 | Feb 2015 | CN |
61-283797 | Dec 1986 | JP |
64-15497 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64-36120 | Mar 1989 | JP |
3-267599 | Nov 1991 | JP |
2003-94148 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2005-48769 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2008-223532 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2014-238084 | Dec 2014 | JP |
2015-521709 | Jul 2015 | JP |
WO 2006090701 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2011102120 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2013058284 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jun. 13, 2017, in PCT/JP2017/014515 filed Apr. 7, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200386239 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |