The disclosure relates to centrifugal compressors. More particularly, the disclosure relates to electric motor-driven centrifugal compressors having controllable inlet guide vane arrays.
One particular use of electric motor-driven centrifugal compressors is liquid chillers. An exemplary liquid cooled chiller uses a hermetic centrifugal compressor. The exemplary unit comprises a standalone combination of the compressor, the condenser unit, the cooler unit, the expansion device, and various additional components.
Some compressors include a transmission intervening between the motor rotor and the impeller to drive the impeller at a faster speed than the motor. In other compressors, the impeller is directly driven by the rotor (e.g., they are on the same shaft).
Centrifugal compressors have a limitation for operating at high head due to flow instability called “surge”. The effect of surge is high vibrations and damage to the impeller and bearings. Hence, it is preferable to avoid surge in a compressor. At a given speed, a compressor has an associated maximum head limitation dictated by surge. For a compressor having inlet guide vanes for capacity control, at a constant suction pressure the discharge pressure at which surge occurs reduces with load. Surge may be triggered by something which increases saturation temperature at the condenser or decreases saturation temperature at the evaporator. For example, if condenser water temperature increases, surge may occur.
In operation, the controller controls vane condition (orientation) to throttle the inlet flow to maintain a required amount of refrigerant flow rate.
Surge can be an issue at compressor startup. Surge may be limited by closing the inlet guide vanes at startup. In one baseline system, the compressor is operating at a given condition when the system suddenly shuts down (e.g., upon power loss, thus leaving the guide vanes in their pre-shutdown condition). At startup, to prevent surge, the guide vanes are first fully closed prior to starting the motor.
An aspect of the disclosure involves a method for controlling a centrifugal compressor having an inlet, an outlet, an impeller mounted for rotation about an impeller axis, a motor coupled to the impeller to drive the impeller about the impeller axis, and a variable inlet guide vane array controllable for movement between a relatively closed first condition and a relatively open second condition. A lift value is determined. An allowable guide vane condition based upon the lift value is determined. The guide vane array is closed to the determined allowable guide vane condition. The impeller is accelerated to an operational speed.
Another aspect of the disclosure involves a controller configured to implement the method.
Another aspect of the disclosure involves a chiller system including the controller, the compressor, a heat rejection heat exchanger downstream of the compressor along a refrigerant flowpath, and a heat absorption heat exchanger downstream of the heat rejection heat exchanger along the refrigerant flowpath.
In various embodiments, the acceleration may be from a dead stop.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The system further includes a second heat exchanger 34 (in the normal mode a heat absorption heat exchanger or evaporator). In the exemplary system, the heat exchanger 34 is a refrigerant-water heat exchanger formed by a tube bundle 35 for chilling a chilled water flow within a chiller unit 36. The unit 36 includes a refrigerant distributor 37. An expansion device 38 is downstream of the compressor and upstream of the evaporator along the normal mode refrigerant flowpath 40 (the flowpath being partially surrounded by associated piping, etc.).
A hot gas bypass valve 42 is positioned along a bypass flowpath branch 44 extending between a first location downstream of the compressor outlet 26 and upstream of the isolation valve 27 and a second location upstream of the inlet of the cooler and downstream of the expansion device 38.
The compressor (
The housing defines a motor compartment 60 containing a stator 62 of the motor within the compartment. A rotor 64 of the motor is partially within the stator and is mounted for rotation about a rotor axis 500. The exemplary mounting is via one or more mechanical and/or electromagnetic bearing systems mounting a shaft 70 of the rotor to the housing assembly. The exemplary impeller 54 is mounted to an impeller shaft 72 (e.g., to an end portion thereof) to rotate therewith as a unit about an impeller axis 502. A transmission 74 may couple the motor shaft to the impeller shaft to allow the motor to drive the impeller and may offset the axis 502 from the axis 500. In alternative implementations, the impeller is directly mounted to the motor shaft to rotate therewith as a unit about the axis 500. Again, one or more bearing systems may mount the impeller shaft for rotation about its axis 502.
As so far described, the system and compressor may be representative of any of numerous system and compressor configurations. The sensors 80 and 82 may be existing sensors used for control of system operation. In an exemplary modification from a baseline such system and compressor, the control routines of the controller 84 may be augmented with an additional routine (subroutine) or module which uses the outputs of one or both of the sensors 80 and 82 to control the compressor and/or system components to avoid or startup surge. The hardware may otherwise be preserved relative to the baseline. In a most basic implementation, the program change (e.g., adding the additional subroutine) is made in a reprogramming or reflash of an existing controller of an existing compressor and/or chiller system so as to remanufacture such compressor and/or chiller system. This may be the only change made or may be made as part of a more comprehensive remanufacturing process. Alternatively, this may be implemented in new equipment (e.g., anywhere from a running change in a manufacture process of compressors and/or chillers to part of a clean sheet design of a compressor and/or chiller).
As alluded to above, the baseline system may be characterized by one of several approaches to startup. One baseline approach to startup involves simply starting up at the last vane condition and responsively compensating for any surge actually encountered. Another possible baseline involves fully closing the vanes prior to motor startup. Whereas the first baseline has disadvantages of encountering surge, the second baseline has disadvantages of extending the startup time. Most of these problems may be reduced or eliminated by a startup procedure that, responsive to a sensed lift condition, only partially closes the vanes (e.g., yet sufficient to avoid surge).
Every compressor has a unique surge line, which determines the operating area where the compressor can operate without surging. The surge line extends from a low guide vane position GV_Low to a high guide vane position GV_High.
Each surge line is characterized by five parameters: GV_Low=guide vane angular position when the guide vane is closed (e.g., 0%); DTs_Low=maximum allowable lift at 100% speed at GV_Low without causing surge; GV_High=guide vane angular position when the guide vane is fully open (i.e., 100%); DTs_High=maximum allowable lift at 100% speed at GV_High without causing surge; and Shapefac=a constant, dependent upon the compressor aerodynamics; −1<x<0. Exemplary Shapefac is −1 to 0, more narrowly, −0.2 to −0.04 or −0.08 to −0.04. Exemplary DTs_Low is 5-15 C. Exemplary DTs_High is 20-30 C.
The surge line 400 is characterized by following equation system:
DT_sat at GV_Pos=A+B*e{circumflex over ( )}C
A=DTs_Low−B
B=(DTs_High−DTs_Low)/(e{circumflex over ( )}D−1)
C=(Shapefac*(GV_Pos−GV_Low))
D=(Shapefac*(GV_High−GV_Low))
It is then determined 308 whether the measured guide vane position (condition) is less open than the maximum allowable guide vane condition. If no, then the guide vanes are closed 310. In the example, this may be a continuous closing with the system repeatedly remeasuring guide vane position at step 302 and comparing it at step 308 until it is within the allowable range. Alternative variations may create incremental variants or variants where the system closes the vanes directly to the target condition. Once the guide vane position is within the allowable range (a “yes” result at step 308) the motor is started 312 and accelerated up to its one hundred percent operating speed which is one hundred percent of a desired motor speed as per design of the compressor.
In one shutdown example, the compressor is initially running and has following characteristics: Shapefac=−0.08; GV_Low=0%; DTs_Low=11.1° C.; GV_High=100%; and DTs_High=22.2 C. Values from the surge line are shown in Table I:
The chiller was operating at 100% speed and 100% guide vane opening. Exemplary saturation temperatures of cooler and condenser were 6.7 C and 28.9 C respectively. Therefore the lift (DTsat) was 22.2 C. Therefore the chiller was operating at the surge line. The power is lost and chiller stops rotating. However, the guide vanes are stuck at 100% because power to the guide vane (GV) actuator is lost. On the other hand, when the compressor is not running, the saturation temperature of the cooler starts rising because the chiller is no longer able to absorb heat from the evaporator liquid. On the other hand, because the chiller is no longer rejecting heat to the condenser, the saturation temperature of the condenser starts to decrease. When power comes back, the exemplary cooler and condenser saturation temperature became 8.9 C and 27.8 C. Therefore, when power came back, the lift across the compressor was 27.8 C−8.9 C=18.9 C. From the above table, the maximum allowable guide vane position is 15%. Where a baseline system would wait until the guide vanes close down to 0%. Therefore, the new algorithm offers an improvement over the baseline by saving the time needed to go from 15% to zero.
In a second example, the chiller was operating at 100% speed and 30% guide vane opening. Exemplary saturation temperatures of cooler and condenser were 8.9 C and 30 C respectively. Therefore the lift (DT_sat) was 21.1 C. Therefore, the chiller was operating at the surge line. The power is lost and chiller stops rotating. However, the guide vanes are stuck at 30% because power to the guide vane actuator is lost. When power came back, the exemplary cooler and condenser saturation temperature became 11.1 C and 23.9 C. Therefore, when power came back, the lift across the compressor was 12.8 C. From the above chart, the maximum allowable guide vane position is 9%.
In a third example, the chiller was operating at 100% speed and 10% guide vane opening. Exemplary saturation temperatures of cooler and condenser were 10 C and 25.6 C respectively. Therefore, the lift (DT_sat) was 15.6 C. Therefore, the chiller was operating well below the surge line because maximum allowable lift is 17.2 C. The power is lost and chiller stops rotating. However, the guide vanes are stuck at 30% because power to the guide vane actuator is lost. When power comes back, the exemplary cooler and condenser saturation temperature became 12.2 C and 23.3 C. Therefore, when power came back, the lift across the compressor was 11.1 C. From the above chart, the maximum allowable guide vane position is 0%. Therefore, the new algorithm does not offer an improvement over the baseline.
Although an embodiment is described above in detail, such description is not intended for limiting the scope of the present disclosure. It will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, when applied to the reengineering of an existing system, details of the existing system or its use may influence details of any particular implementation. As noted above, in a minimal change situation, this may be achieved by merely reprogramming the controller to perform the method (e.g., adding the steps 306 and 308 to a basic startup algorithm). Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Benefit is claimed of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/565,702, filed Dec. 1, 2011, and entitled “Centrifugal Compressor Startup Control”, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if set forth at length.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/065194 | 11/15/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/081840 | 6/6/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3362625 | Endress | Jan 1968 | A |
3973391 | Reed et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4151725 | Kountz | May 1979 | A |
4282719 | Kountz et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4460310 | Plunkett | Jul 1984 | A |
4503684 | Mount | Mar 1985 | A |
4514991 | Zinsmeyer | May 1985 | A |
4608833 | Kountz | Sep 1986 | A |
4616483 | Leonard | Oct 1986 | A |
4686834 | Haley | Aug 1987 | A |
4969798 | Sakai | Nov 1990 | A |
4989403 | Rodgers | Feb 1991 | A |
5095714 | Adachi | Mar 1992 | A |
5306116 | Gunn | Apr 1994 | A |
5368440 | Japikse | Nov 1994 | A |
5537830 | Goshaw et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5618160 | Harada | Apr 1997 | A |
5669756 | Brasz | Sep 1997 | A |
5683223 | Harada | Nov 1997 | A |
5746062 | Beaverson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5807071 | Brasz | Sep 1998 | A |
5873696 | Harada | Feb 1999 | A |
5947680 | Harada | Sep 1999 | A |
6012897 | Sabnis | Jan 2000 | A |
6036432 | Sishtla | Mar 2000 | A |
6039534 | Stoner | Mar 2000 | A |
6129511 | Salvage | Oct 2000 | A |
6341238 | Modeen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6427464 | Beaverson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6506011 | Sishtla | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6581399 | Benedict et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6789000 | Munson, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7972105 | Dejoris et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8079808 | Sconfietti | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8291720 | Hartman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
9388815 | Chen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20040221592 | Knopp | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050160748 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050265819 | Kotani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070214787 | Noelle | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080253877 | Bodell | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090097962 | Williams | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100263391 | Tetu | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110048046 | Sommer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110056210 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110182715 | Leithead et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120219431 | Sishtla | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140260388 | Umeda | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1650105 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1826499 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101896773 | Nov 2010 | CN |
1593361 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2011049891 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011049891 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280059349.1, dated Jan. 14, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280059349.1, dated Jun. 26, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065194, dated Feb. 7, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150219110 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61565702 | Dec 2011 | US |