Traditional phase separation devices, such as tubal, decanter and cone centrifuges have been used for various separation tasks, including those in medicine and pharmaceutical production, and wastewater treatment. Selection of the type of separation devices has depended upon such factors as residence time desired, size of waste particles, G force required to effect separation, and tolerances for such factors as interrupted use to clean system, noise, vibration, wear, energy use and maintenance.
More recently, U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,610 disclosed a density screening device employing a thick-shelled outer cylinder wall having a series of indentations, each of which leads to a nozzle or opening that penetrates the outer wall of the outer cylinder. Through the openings, the continuous, non-mechanically assisted accumulation and ejection of heavy particle waste occurs along the entirety of the centrifugal device. The waste is collected by an exterior, non-rotating catchment cylinder or similar device in which the outer cylinder resides and rotates. The heavier waste materials accumulate on the stationary catchment cylinder wall and merely drip downwards at normal earth gravity, without further opportunity for recovery.
An object of the present invention, therefore, is to provide a centrifugal density screening device with waste release controls to improve recovery ratio of the effluent. This is accomplished by controlling the pressure and forces on the waste material.
A further object of the invention is to provide channels in which to collect waste material for release at selected, desired intervals.
Another object of the invention is to provide a centrifugal density screening device with multiple waste release mechanisms for filtering different areas of the device separately.
The objects of the invention are accomplished by providing a centrifuge filter for phase separation employing an outer cylinder having an interior wall with a plurality of indentations each with an orifice, and an outer wall with channels leading from an orifice to a waste control valve. Heavy particles collect in the channels and flow by force of pressure, and exit through a waste control valve when it is opened to release the waste.
a is a sectional view of the outer cylinder.
b is a cut away view of the interior wall of the outer cylinder.
The present invention is a fluid separator for solids in which an outer cylinder has an interior wall with a plurality of indentations, the indentations each having an orifice, and further having an outer wall in which are set channels, each channel being in communication with and leading from an orifice to at least one waste control valve. An inner cylinder is arranged spatially within the outer cylinder. The inner cylinder has fins so as to form a fluid flow path between the exterior of the inner cylinder and the interior of the outer cylinder. Fluid enters through one end of the drum to entry ports and into the main body of a rotating system. The centrifugal forces created by the rotating system cause impurities to pass through the orifices in the indentations and into the waste routing channels positioned within the outer cylinder. The particles collect in the waste routing channel, flow by force of pressure into a rotating housing and exit through a waste control valve when it is opened to release the waste.
When the fluids containing suspended solids are subject to gravitational forces within a centrifuge, the elements having a higher specific gravity will tend to drop out of solution. The rate of dropout generally depends on a variety of factors including size of the particulate matter, the G forces to which they are subjected, the degree of difference of specific gravity between the particulate matter and the fluid, and the relationship the particulate matter shares with the surrounding fluid. The greater the G forces to which the fluid is subjected, the faster the elements having the heavier specific gravity will separate and gradate themselves. In this manner, the heaviest elements in the waste flow of the present invention gravitate away from the spinning axis of the rotating housing and displace the lighter elements within the waste routing channel, forcing the lighter elements back toward the spinning axis and the fluid flow channels. The effluent, therefore, becomes more concentrated as time elapses in the system of the present invention, resulting in an improved recovery ratio due to this displacement. The waste control valves may be opened periodically to release impurities as needed or as desired. An outer cylinder surrounds the inner cylinder to contain waste and direct the waste to one or multiple waste control valves where it can be collected and removed.
In
In
In
The speed at which abrasive particulate material may pass through the orifices 105 may be greatly reduced, thereby minimizing the abrasion that occurs at the orifice 105, and diminishing the need for abrasion-resistant nozzles to protect the orifice. In previously known devices, the size of a passage for separation of particulate matter from the fluid flow must be large enough so as not to lose effectiveness by a build-up of material that can clog the passage. Too large a passage, however, reduces the recovery since fluid is lost through the passage, along with the particulate matter. In the present invention, fluid that passes through the orifice may be recovered once the particulate matter accumulated in the waste routing channel displaces the fluid back into the fluid flow channels. This is controlled by controlling the opening of the waste flow valves. The reduction in abrasion achieved with the present invention permits an embodiment in which the inner wall 210 of the outer cylinder 104 to be made of plastics, such that the indentations 106 and orifices 105 are of plastic, while the outer wall 220 of the outer cylinder 104 may be metal or the like. This embodiment of mixed material of the outer cylinder allows for a lighter device, therefore reducing the power requirement for operation. Additionally, it may lower production and maintenance costs.
In
Inner cylinder 103 has fins 102 for creating flow channels, and may additionally have other projections such as ribs 310 for routing the flow of fluid in the flow channels to increase the residence time. The ribs 310 and fins 102 may be arranged in various configurations and may be angled to the fins 102 at various degrees to maximize the efficiency of the flow.
Further benefits arise from control of the waste removal through the waste routing channels 107. Differing materials when concentrated, and the degree to which they are concentrated, take on specific characteristics. For heavily concentrated material, an increase in force is needed to expel the material from the waste routing channels 107 additionally so in circumstances where higher G forces are being exerted on the material at the time of expulsion. In the present invention, the expulsion force is supplied in the form of an internal drum pressure, such as may be obtained from a supply pump or an auxiliary source plumbed to the system. In one embodiment, the orientation of the waste flow control valve 120 may supply additional force for expelling effluent.
Pressure within the system can be varied to effect purging of waste material from the system. Since different materials have different characteristics when subject to varied G forces, controlling the amount of pressure within the system assists in creating sufficient force to expel the waste material out of the system. The amount of force or pressure required depends on the desired viscosity of the concentrated waste and the G force to which the material is subjected. The desired viscosity is in turn controlled by how often the system is purged. Pressures may range from about 10 psi to about 10,000 psi. The speed of the system can also be adjusted during the purging process to accommodate expulsion of waste material. The waste routing channels 107 and the waste flow control valve 120 are positioned so as to assist in moving waste material out of the system.
In
The length and diameter of both the outer cylinder 104 and the inner cylinder 103 can be sized to meet different flow demands. If a large flow rate is required, the diameter and length of both cylinders can be increased so that the volume of fluid within the system is increased. The increased volume allows for a higher flow rate through the system while maintaining a residence time that can efficiently clean the fluid. In a system having smaller cylinder diameters and lengths, the fluid will also be cleaned, but the flow rate through the system will be reduced and the speed of rotation will be required to be higher to achieve the desired residence time to G force ratio.
Speed of rotation can be varied to obtain the G forces necessary to clean the fluid. The desired speed is associated with the diameters of the cylinders. Since some fluids require greater G forces to effect cleansing than do others, the volume to be filtered and the G forces required for filtering will factor in the size of the system selected.
The size of the orifice in the indentation can be varied in diameter to accommodate the size of particulate matter in the fluid being filtered. The size of the orifices may range from about 1/64 inch to about ½ inch in diameter, selected based upon the size of the particulate matter to be removed from the fluid. Various sizes of the orifice are possible, since the orifices are in communication with the waste routing channel, which in turn leads to a waste control flow valve. This orientation permits filtering of different portions of the cylinder simultaneously or at differing intervals to improve efficiency of the system.
The invention having been depicted and described in detail herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that various modifications, additions, substitutions and the like can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and these are therefore considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2538529 | Komline | Jan 1951 | A |
2688437 | Monnet | Sep 1954 | A |
3823869 | Loison | Jul 1974 | A |
3955758 | Loison | May 1976 | A |
4353499 | Simonds | Oct 1982 | A |
5338284 | Knelson | Aug 1994 | A |
5462513 | McAlister | Oct 1995 | A |
5586965 | Knelson | Dec 1996 | A |
5601523 | Knelson | Feb 1997 | A |
5601524 | Knelson | Feb 1997 | A |
6312610 | Kirker et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9808611 | Mar 1998 | WO |