Patent Application
20110039921
The present invention discloses cephalomannine derivatives of general formula (I), a process for the preparation of such cephalomannine derivatives, a composition containing such compounds, and use of said compounds in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of tumors, especially multidrug resistant tumors.
Taxanes belong to terpenes, and are of interest in both biological and chemical fields. Taxol (paclitaxel), one of taxanes, exhibits good inhibitory activity against tumors. It has been marketed as anticancer drug, and has the following structure:
wherein, Ac is acetyl, and Bz is benzoyl.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,814,470 to Colin et. al. has disclosed docetaxel, an analogue of taxol, the activity of which is significantly stronger than taxol. Docetaxel has also been marketed as anticancer drug, and has the following structure:
Taxol and docetaxel have a unique mechanism of action. They mainly promote the polymerization of tubulins and inhibit the depolymerization thereof, resulting in the abnormal arrangement of microtubule bundles and the formation of cladosclereids. Thus, the spindles lose normal functions, and the cell cycle is blocked in G2/M period, leading to the death of cancer cells (Schiff, P. B.; Fant, J.; Horwitz S. B. Nature. 1979, 277: 665). They are currently best-selling anticancer drugs, because of their unique and significantly useful effect against a variety of tumors which cannot be treated by other anticancer drugs.
Taxol has obtained great success in clinical therapy. However, it still has some disadvantages to be overcome. The inefficacy in chemotherapy of taxol against patients with primary and secondary drug-resistant tumors become a more and more serious problem in the use of taxol, beside other disadvantages e.g. poor water-solubility, limited resources, and the like. In addition, docetaxel is also ineffective on tumors which are resistant to taxol. These problems greatly restricted the application of taxol and docetaxel. The development of novel taxanes anticancer drugs effective on multidrug resistant tumors is of great importance.
It is well known that one of major factors rendering the failure of tumor chemotherapy is the multidrug resistance of tumors. The reasons for the occurrence of multidrug resistance are very complex. The drug resistance of taxol is mainly associated with overexpression of P-glycoproteins and mutations of tubulins which are the targets of this kind of drugs. The drug resistance mediated by tubulins may arise from mutations of amino acid residues. In addition, the binding ability of taxol to variant tubulins decreases, resulting in the decrease of activity of taxol. P-glycoproteins can move a variety of ectogenic compounds, including chemotherapeutic drugs, out of the cells by active transport, rendering the concentration of the compounds in tumor cells less than the effective concentration.
The drug resistant tumors can be overcome mainly by the following routes: (1) administering the anticancer drugs in combination with MDR reversal agents, particularly P-glycoprotein inhibitors; (2) discovering novel anticancer drugs effective on drug resistant tumors. Researches based on the first route have been generally carried out, and they are theoretically possible, furthermore, some good experimental results both in vivo and in vitro have been reported. However, it is unfortunate that no clinically ideal effect has been obtained up to now. Therefore, the attention was turned toward the second route, i.e. developing new anticancer drugs which are also effective on drug resistant tumors. This has become a research focus of taxanes all over the world. Some second generation taxane compounds effective on multidrug resistant tumors, e.g. BMS-148876, IDN-5109, have been reported. The activity of these compounds against multidrug resistant tumors is significantly higher than taxol and docetaxel, and currently, they have been advanced into the clinical trial phase.
Cephalomannine is analogous to taxol in structure (show below), its content in plants is high (1 to 2%, comparable to the content of taxol), and its effect on sensitive and resistant tumors is similar to taxol. But cephalomannine currently was not used sufficiently, because it usually was discarded as side product of taxol during industrial separation. Now, we made modification using cephalomannine, an analogue of taxol, as leading compound, this is beneficial for both the development of new drugs and the full utility of resources.
A technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide novel cephalomannine derivatives which are effective on the tumors resistant to taxol and docetaxel.
Another technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a novel process for the preparation of said cephalomannine derivatives.
Still another technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of general formula (I) as active ingredient and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
Yet another technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide the use of novel cephalomannine derivatives and compositions containing them as antineoplastic agent.
To solve technical problems as mentioned above, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
Specifically, cephalomannine derivatives of the present invention are represented by general formula (I)
wherein,
R1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, TMS, TES, TBS and —COX1, and X1 is selected from C1-5 alkyl;
R2 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted straight or branched C1-15 alkyl, C2-15 alkenyl, C2-15 alkynyl, un-, mono- or multi-substituted aryl and heteroaryl, —COX2; —COX3—COOX4; —COX3—CONX4X5;
R3 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted straight or branched C1-15 alkyl, C2-15 alkenyl, C2-15 alkynyl, un-, mono- or multi-substituted aryl and heteroaryl, —OX6; —SX6; —NHX6; —OCOX6;
and,
X2, X3, X4, X5 and X6 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen; substituted or unsubstituted straight or branched C1-15 alkyl, C2-15 alkenyl, C2-15 alkynyl, un-, mono- or multi-substituted aryl and heteroaryl;
the substituents for said alkyl are selected from the group consisting of hydroxy, amino, carboxyl, carbonyl, C1-5 alkoxy, halo, C1-5 alkoxycarbonyl, N—C1-5 alkylcarbamoyl, cyano, nitro;
the substituents for said aryl and heteroaryl are selected from the group consisting of hydroxy, hydroxymethyl, halo, C1-5 alkyl, C1-5 alkoxy, C1-5 alkenyl, acyl, acyloxy, nitro, amino, amido, cyano, azido;
Preferred C1-15 alkenyl is selected from the group consisting of vinyl, propenyl, isopropenyl, butenyl, isobutenyl, hexenyl;
Preferred C1-15 alkynyl is selected from the group consisting of ethynyl, propinyl, isopropinyl, butynyl, isobutynyl, hexynyl;
Preferred aryl is selected from the group consisting of phenyl, naphthyl, biphenyl;
Preferred heteroaryl is selected from the group consisting of furyl, thienyl, pyridyl, benzofuryl, bipyridyl;
the halo is selected from F, Cl, Br, I.
More preferred R1 and R2 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, formyl, acetyl, propionyl.
The symbols and terms used herein have the following meanings:
“Bz” represents benzoyl; “Ph” represents phenyl; “Ac” represents acetyl; “Et” represents ethyl; “R” generally represents alkyl, unless otherwise indicated; “TMS” represents trimethylsilyl; “TES” represents triethylsilyl; “TBS” represents tert-butyldimethylsilyl; “DMAP” represents p-dimethylaminopyridine; “DMF” represents N,N-dimethylformamide; “THF” represents tetrahydrofuran; “DCC” represents dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; “PP” represents 4-pyrrolylpyridine; “r.t.” represents room temperature; “TritonB” represents benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide.
The present invention also relates to a process for the preparation of compounds according to the present invention, which is illustrated in the following schemes IIa and IIb:
Specifically, the hydroxy at C-7 position of the cephalomannine modified or unmodified at C-10 position as starting material was condensed with a corresponding acid or acyl chloride to produce the compound of formula IIa; alternatively, after the removal of benzoyl at 2-position of the cephalomannine modified at both C-10 and C-7 positions as starting material, a key intermediate was provided, said intermediate was then condensed with a corresponding acid or acyl chloride to produce the compound of formula IIb.
The acylation reaction as mentioned above was preferably carried out in the presence of a condensation agent. Preferred condensation agents include 1,3-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), dipyridyl carbonate (2-DPC), 1,3-diisopropyl carbodiimide (DIPC), 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide (EDCI); more preferred agents are DCC, DIPC, EDCI.
The acylation reaction as mentioned above was preferably carried out in the presence of a catalyst. Preferred catalysts include tertiary amines, pyridine, 4-dimethylaminopyridine and 4-pyrrolylpyridine; more preferred catalysts are 4-dimethylaminopyridine and 4-pyrrolylpyridine.
The acylation reaction as mentioned above was preferably carried out in the presence of an organic solvent. Preferred organic solvents include dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), toluene, methylene chloride, ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF); more preferred organic solvents include toluene, tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF).
The reaction temperature ranges from 10 to 120° C., preferably from 30 to 90° C.
The present invention also relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of the present invention as active ingredient. The pharmaceutical composition can be prepared according to methods well known in the art. The compound of the present invention can be formulated into any dosage forms suitable for administration to human or animals in combination with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable solid or liquid excipients and/or adjuvants. In general, the content of the compound of the present invention in the pharmaceutical composition is from 0.1 to 95% by weight.
The compound according to the present invention or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound can be administered in unit dose form, the routes of administration may be intestinal or parenteral, such as oral, intravenous, intramuscularly, subcutaneous, nasal, mouth mucosa, ophthalmic, pulmonary and respiratory tract, dermal, vaginal, rectal administration etc.
The dosage forms for administration may be liquid, solid or semisolid dosage forms. The liquid dosage forms may be solutions (including true solutions and colloid solutions), emulsions (including o/w type, w/o type and multiple emulsions), suspensions, injections (including aqueous injections, powder injections and infusions), eye drops, nasal drops, lotions and liniments etc.; the solid dosage forms may be tablets (including conventional tablets, enteric tablets, buccal tablets, dispersible tablets, chewable tablets, effervescent tablets, orally disintegrating tablets), capsules (including hard capsules, soft capsules, enteric capsules), granules, granules, pellets, dropping pills, suppositories, membranes, patches, aerosols/powder inhalations, sprays, etc.; the semisolid dosage forms may be ointments, gels, pastes, etc.
The compounds of present invention can be formulated into common formulations, as well as sustained release formulations, controlled release formulations, targeting formulations and various particulate delivery systems.
To formulate the compounds of present invention into tablets, a variety of excipients well known in the art can be widely used, including diluents, binders, wetting agents, disintegrants, lubricants, glidants. The diluents may be starches, dextrins, sucrose, glucose, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, xylitol, microcrystalline cellulose, calcium sulfate, calcium hydrogen phosphate, calcium carbonate and the like; the wetting agents may be water, ethanol, isopropanol and the like; the binders may be starch slurry, dextrins, syrup, honey, glucose solution, microcrystalline cellulose, acacia mucilage, gelatin slurry, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, acrylic resins, carbomer, polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyethylene glycols and the like; the disintegrants may be drying starches, microcrystalline cellulose, low substituted hydroxypropylcellulose, cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidones, croscarmellose sodium, sodium carboxymethyl starch, sodium bicarbonate and citric acid, polyoxyethylene sorbitol fatty acid esters, sodium lauryl sulfate and the like; the lubricants and glidants may be talc, silicon dioxide, stearate, tartaric acid, liquid paraffin, polyethylene glycols and the like.
The tablets may be further processed to form coated tablets, e.g. sugar-coated tablets, film-coated tablets, enteric-coated tablets, or double-layer tablets and multi-layer tablets.
In order to formulate the dosing unit into capsules, the compounds according to the present invention as active ingredient can be mixed with diluents and glidants, and the mixtures are then loaded directly in hard or soft capsules. The compounds according to the present invention as active ingredient can also firstly be formulated, together with diluents, binders and disintegrants, into granules or pellets, then they are loaded in hard or soft capsules. The diluents, binders, wetting agents, disintegrants, glidants for preparing the tablets of the compounds according to the present invention can also be used for preparing the capsules of the compounds according to the present invention.
To formulate the compounds according to the present invention into injections, water, ethanol, isopropanol, propylene glycol or a mixture thereof can be used as solvent, and to which suitable amount of solubilizers, cosolvents, pH modifiers, osmotic pressure controlling agents can be added. The solubilizers or auxiliary solvents may be poloxamer, lecithin, hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, and the like; the pH modifiers may be phosphates, acetates, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and the like; the osmotic pressure controlling agents may be sodium chloride, mannitol, glucose, phosphate, acetate, and the like. For the preparation of lyophilized powder injections, mannitol, glucose, etc. can also be added as support agents.
In addition, the colorants, preservatives, fragrant agents, flavoring agents or other additives may also be added to the pharmaceutical formulations if necessary.
According to the present invention, the compounds of general formula (I) show significant biological activity in pharmacological screening assay, and are useful antineoplastic agents. They can be used to inhibit the growth of tumors in the body of animals including humans.
According to the in vitro pharmacological experimental, it has been found that the compounds according to the present invention exhibit potent inhibitory effect on sensitive tumors, wherein the compound with the strongest activity exhibits comparable activity to taxol for the sensitive tumors; however, its activity is dozens of times as high as that of taxol for the drug resistant tumors arising from the overexpression of P-glycoproteins. The compounds according to the present invention are also effective for the drug resistant tumors rising from mutations of the amino acids residues of tubulins, and their activities are stronger than taxol.
The in vivo experiment revealed that the growth inhibition effect of the compounds according to the present invention on human pulmonary adenocarcinoma A549 nude mice xenograft tumor is stronger than that of taxol.
In order to achieve the purpose of treatment and enhance the effect of treatment, the medicament of the present invention or pharmaceutical composition can be administrated by any known manner for administration.
The dose of the compounds or pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will vary in a wide range depending on the nature and severity of the diseases to be prevented or treated, individual condition of the patients or animals, administration routes, dosage forms, and the like. In general, the suitable daily dose range of the compounds according to the present invention is from 0.001 to 150 mg/Kg body weight, preferably from 0.1 to 100 mg/Kg body weight, more preferably from 1 to 60 mg/Kg body weight, most preferably from 2 to 30 mg/Kg body weight. Said dose may be administrated as a single dose unit or divided dose units, depending on the clinical experience of the physicians and the dose regimen including the use of other therapeutic manners.
The compounds or compositions of the present invention may be administrated alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents or the agents for symptomatic treatment. When a compound of the present invention is synergistic with other therapeutic agents, its dose should be adjusted according to the practical condition.
The following examples serve to illustrate the present invention without limiting the scope thereof.
Cephalomannine (600 mg, 0.721 mmol) was dissolved in 5 ml DMF, then imidazole (245.5 mg, 3.61 mmol) and tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (543.5 mg, 3.61 mmol) were added. After reacting at 70° C. for 5 h, 10 ml of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. A silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=5:1) was carried out to yield the title product (637 mg, 93.4%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-cephalomannine (98 mg, 0.103 mmol) was dissolved in 6 ml ethanol, then 85% hydrazine hydrate (0.625 ml) was added. After reacting at room temperature for 2 h, 10 ml of saturated aqueous NH4Cl was added. The mixture was exacted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=2:1) was carried out to yield the title product (79.4 mg, 84.8%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-deacetyl-cephalomannine (32 mg, 0.035 mmol) was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) was added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added. The mixture was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was then evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform:methanol=20:1) was carried out to yield the title product (25.7 mg, 91.92%).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 8.10 (2H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 7.61 (1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 7.50 (2H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 7.28-7.39 (5H, m), 6.65 (1H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 6.44 (1H, dq, J=7.2, 1.4 Hz), 6.16 (1H, t, J=8.1 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J=8.9, 2.7 Hz), 5.18 (1H, s), 4.91 (1H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 4.91 (1H, brs), 4.39 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 4.24 (1H, brs), 4.19 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 3.87 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 3.72 (1H, brs), 2.53-2.62 (1H, m), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.24 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 1.82-1.88 (1H, m), 1.82 (3H, s), 1.76 (3H, s), 1.72 (3H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 1.21 (3H, s), 1.11 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 812.3.
Examples 2-4 were prepared according to the following scheme
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-deacetyl-cephalomannine (155 mg, 0.171 mmol) was dissolved in 5 ml THF, then CeCl3 (8.4 mg) was added, cooling in ice bath. Propionic anhydride (0.22 ml, 1.71 mmol) was added. After reacting at 30° C. for 2 h, 300 ml ethyl acetate was added, and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×50 ml) and 50 ml saturated NaCl solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (150 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (acetone:petroleum ether=1:2) was carried out to yield the title product (148.2 mg, 97%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-propionyl-cephalomannine (193 mg, 0.201 mmol) was dissolved in 2 ml of DMF, then imidazole (73 mg, 1.07 mmol) and triethylsilyl chloride (0.135 ml) were added. After reacting at room temperature for 10 h, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 ml) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=5:1) was carried out to yield the title product (198 mg, 91.7%).
2-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-7-triethylsilyl-10-propionyl-cephalomannine (168 mg, 0.156 mmol) was dissolved in 7 ml of methylene chloride. After cooling at −28° C. in ice-methanol bath, TritonB (0.138 ml, 0.313 mmol) was added dropwise. After reacting for 15 minutes, 20 ml of methylene chloride was added. The mixture was washed with saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×50 ml). The organic layer was washed with 20 ml of saturated NaCl solution, then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The organic layer was evaporated to dryness. A silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:1) was carried out to yield the title product (110 mg, 73%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-7-triethylsilyl-10-propionyl-cephalomannine (35.7 mg, 0.0368 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, then m-azidobenzoic acid (62.5 mg, 0.383 mmol), PP (5.7 mg, 0.0383 mmol) and DCC (79 mg, 0.383 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml of methanol was added, followed by filtration. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1) was carried out. The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. Said product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (20.3 mg, 62.3% of total yield over two steps).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 7.89 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 7.80 (1H, m), 7.48 (1H, t, J=7.8 Hz), 7.31-7.42 (5H, m), 7.24 (1H, ddd, J=1.2, 2.4, 8.1 Hz), 6.49 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.40 (1H, dq, J=1.5, 6.9 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.17 (1H, t, J=8.1 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 5.58 (1H, dd, J=2.7, 8.7 Hz), 4.94 (1H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 4.68 (1H, brs), 4.40 (1H, m), 4.30 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.17 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 3.80 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 3.63 (1H, brs), 2.47-2.62 (3H, m), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.31 (2H, overlap), 1.82-1.95 (1H, m), 1.78-1.80 (6H, brs), 1.72 (3H, dd, J=1.5, 6.9 Hz), 1.67 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.23 (3H, t, J=7.8 Hz), 1.14 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 909.4.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-7-triethylsilyl-10-propionyl-cephalomannine (37.2 mg, 0.0383 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, then m-methoxybenzoic acid (58.3 mg, 0.383 mmol), PP (5.7 mg, 0.0383 mmol) and DCC (79 mg, 0.383 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 24 h, 0.1 ml of methanol was added, followed by filtration. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1) was carried out. The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (21.0 mg, 62.5% of total yield over two steps).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 7.71 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 7.62-7.69 (1H, m), 7.29-7.43 (6H, m), 7.15(1H, ddd, J=0.9, 2.7, 8.3 Hz), 6.51 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.42 (1H, dq, J=1.5, 7.2 Hz), 6.39 (1H, s), 6.19 (1H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 5.59 (1H dd, J=2.7, 8.6 Hz), 4.94 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 4.69 (1H, brs), 4.36-4.44 (1H, m), 4.33 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.17 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 3.88 (3H, s), 3.79 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 3.63 (1H, brs), 2.45-2.63 (3H, m), 2.33 (3H, s), 2.26 (2H, dd, J=3.0, 9.0 Hz), 1.86-1.92 (1H, m), 1.80 (3H, pseud-t, J=1.2 Hz), 1.79 (3H, d, J=1.2 Hz), 1.72 (3H, dd, J=1.2, 6.9 Hz), 1.67 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.23 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.14 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 898.4.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-propionyl-cephalomannine (26 mg, 0.027 mmol) was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform:methanol=20:1) was carried out to yield the title product (21.1 mg, 92%).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 8.11 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 7.61 (1H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 7.50 (2H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 7.31-7.42 (5H, m), 6.54 (1H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 6.43 (1H, dq, J=1.2, 6.9 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.20 (1H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 5.61 (1H, dd, J=3.0, 8.7 Hz), 4.93 (1H, dd, J=2.1, 9.5 Hz), 4.70 (1H, d, J=2.4 Hz), 4.36-4.42 (1H, m), 4.29 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 4.18 (1H, d, J=8.4), 3.79 (1H, d, J=7.2), 3.66 (1H, brs), 2.47-2.62 (3H, m), 2.35 (3H, s), 2.25-2.34 (2H, m), 1.86-1.91 (1H, m), 1.80 (3H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.72 (3H, dd, J=1.2, 6.9 Hz), 1.67 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.23 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.14 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 884.4.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-cephalomannine (351 mg, 0.329 mmol) was dissolved in 7 ml of methylene chloride, cooling at −28° C. in ice-methanol bath, then TritonB (0.308 ml) was added dropwise. After reacting for 15 minutes, 20 ml of methylene chloride was added. The organic layer was washed with 20 ml of saturated ammonium chloride solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×50 ml). The organic layer was washed with 20 ml of saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The organic layer was then evaporated to dryness. A silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:1) was carried out to yield the title product (209 mg, 67.4%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-cephalomannine (62 mg, 0.0662 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, then m-azidobenzoic acid (121.4 mg, 0.744 mmol), PP (11 mg, 0.0742 mmol) and DCC (153.51 mg, 0.744 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrate was combined and evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1) was carried out. The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. Said product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (43 mg, 83.4% of total yield over two steps).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 7.89 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 7.79 (1H, m), 7.48 (1H, t, J=7.8 Hz), 7.31-7.40 (5H, m), 7.22-7.25 (1H, m), 6.49 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.41 (1H, dq, J=1.5, 6.9 Hz), 6.27 (1H, s), 6.17 (1H, t, J=8.5 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 5.58 (1H, dd, J=2.7, 8.7 Hz), 4.94 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 4.68 (1H, d, J=2.7 Hz), 4.39 (1H, dd, J=6.9, 9.45 Hz), 4.30 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.16 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 3.79 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 2.48-2.62 (1H, m), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.30 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 2.24 (3H, s), 1.82-1.91 (1H, m), 1.79 (6H, s), 1.73 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.67 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.14 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 895.4.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-cephalomannine (56 mg, 0.0598 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, m-methoxybenzoic acid (113 mg, 0.742 mmol), PP (11 mg, 0.0742 mmol) and DCC (153.51 mg, 0.744 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1) was carried out. The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. Said product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (37.3 mg, 64.5% of total yield over two steps).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 7.70 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 7.68 (1H, m), 7.30-7.42 (6H, m), 7.13 (1H, dd, J=2.7, 7.5 Hz), 6.55 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.42 (1H, dq, J=1.2, 6.9 Hz), 6.26 (1H, s), 6.18 (1H, t, J=7.8 Hz), 5.65 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 5.58 (1H, dd, J=3.0, 8.55 Hz), 4.93 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 4.69 (1H, d, J=3.0 Hz), 4.38 (1H, dd, J=6.6, 11.0 Hz), 4.31 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.17 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 3.77 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 2.48-2.62 (1H, m), 2.32 (3H, s), 2.28 (2H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 1.86-1.90 (1H, m), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.78 (3H, s), 1.71 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.66 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.14 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 884.4.
Examples 7-14 were prepared according to the following scheme:
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-deacetyl-cephalomannine (300 mg, 0.332 mmol) was dissolved in 10 ml of THF under N2, then cooled in ice-salt bath at −10° C., and N,O-bis(triethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (1 ml) and LHMDS (3 ul) were added. After reacting for 10 minutes, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 ml) was added, then extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=5:1) was carried out to yield the title product (314 mg, 92.6%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-triethylsilyl-cephalomannine (300 mg, 0.171 mmol) was dissolved in 5 ml of THF, then cooled in ice bath, and propionic anhydride (0.40 ml) was added. After reacting at room temperature for 20 h, 300 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×50 ml) and saturated NaCl solution (50 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (150 ml). The ethyl acetate layer was combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (acetone:petroleum ether=1:2) was carried out to yield the title product (301.0 mg, 95.1%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (168 mg, 0.156 mmol) was dissolved in 7 ml of methylene chloride, then cooled in ice-methanol bath at −28° C., and TritonB (0.138 ml, 0.313 mmol) was added dropwise. After reacting for 15 minutes, 20 ml of methylene chloride was added, then washed with 20 ml of saturated ammonium chloride solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×50 ml). The organic layer was washed with 20 ml of saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The organic layer was evaporated to dryness. A silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:1) was carried out to yield the title product (110 mg, 73%).
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (26 mg, 0.0268 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, m-methoxybenzoic acid (40.76 mg, 0.268 mmol), PP (2.38 mg, 0.016 mmol) and DCC (55.28 mg, 0.268 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness. Then a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1) was carried out. The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (18.5 mg, 72.9% of total yield over two steps).
1H 300M (CDCl3): δ 7.70 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 7.62 (1H, brs), 7.31-7.43 (6H, m), 7.15 (1H, dd, J=2.1, 8.1 Hz), 6.61 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.44 (1H, q, J=6.9 Hz), 6.15 (1H, t, J=8.4 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J=2.4, 9.0 Hz), 5.45 (1H, dd, J=7.2, 10.2 Hz), 5.28 (1H, s), 4.91 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.69 (1H, d, J=2.1 Hz), 4.35 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.20 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 3.97 (1H, overlapped), 3.96 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 3.87 (3H, s), 3.6 (1H, brs), 2.46-2.56 (1H, m), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.25 (2H, m), 2.24 (2H, q, J=7.8 Hz), 1.91-1.95 (1H, m), 1.86 (3H, s), 1.81 (6H, brs), 1.73 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.20 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.08 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 898.3, [M+K]+ 914.3.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (20 mg, 0.0206 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, and m-azidobenzoic acid (33.6 mg, 0.206 mmol), PP (1.8 mg, 0.0124 mmol) and DCC (42.5 mg, 0.206 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (15.0 mg, 76.5% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.89 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 7.79 (1H, brs), 7.49 (1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 7.21-7.40 (6H, m), 6.57 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.42 (1H, q, J=6.7 Hz), 6.14 (1H, t, J=8.9 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J=2.7, 9.0 Hz), 5.46 (1H, dd, J=7.5, 10.5 Hz), 5.29 (1H, s), 4.92 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz), 4.68 (1H, d, J=2.7 Hz), 4.32 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 4.19 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 3.98 (1H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 3.97 (1H, overlapped), 3.60 (1H, brs), 2.52 (1H, ddd, J=7.3, 9.5, 15.0 Hz), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.21-2.34 (2H, m), 2.25 (2H, q, J=7.6 Hz), 1.92 (1H, m), 1.84 (3H, s), 1.83 (3H, s), 1.80 (3H, s), 1.72 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.21 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.08 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 909.3, [M+K]+ 925.3.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (23 mg, 0.0237 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, m-chlorobenzoic acid (37.1 mg, 0.237 mmol), PP (2.1 mg, 0.014 mmol) and DCC (48.9 mg, 0.237 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (17.5 mg, 78.3% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.10 (1H, s), 8.00 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 7.59 (1H, dd, J=1.5, 8.0 Hz), 7.46 (1H, t, J=8.0 Hz), 7.30-7.414 (5H, m), 6.59 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz), 6.44 (1H, q, J=7.0 Hz), 6.13 (1H, t, J=9.0 Hz), 5.62 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J=2.5, 9.0 Hz), 5.44 (1H, dd, J=7.5, 10.5 Hz), 5.28 (1H, s), 4.92 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz), 4.69 (1H, d, J=1.5 Hz), 4.30 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz), 4.18 (1H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 3.97 (1H, d, J=6.5 Hz), 3.97 (1H, overlapped), 3.60 (1H, brs), 2.51 (1H, ddd, J=7.3, 9.5, 15.0 Hz), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.28 (2H, m, overlapped), 2.25 (2H, q, J=7.6 Hz) 1.92 (1H, m), 1.84 (3H, s), 1.82 (3H, s), 1.81 (3H, s), 1.73 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.20 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.07 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 902.3, [M+K]+ 918.3.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (20 mg, 0.0206 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, and 3-methyl-2-butenoic acid (20.6 mg, 0.206 mmol), PP (1.8 mg, 0.0124 mmol) and DCC (42.5 mg, 0.206 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (7.5 mg, 45.2% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.29-7.42 (5H, m), 6.59 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.46 (1H, q, J=6.9 Hz), 6.13 (1H, t, J=8.9 Hz), 5.69 (1H, s), 5.58 (1H, dd, J=1.8, 8.7 Hz), 5.39-5.45 (2H, overlapped), 5.25 (1H, s), 4.91 (1H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 4.67 (1H, d, J=1.8 Hz), 4.46 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 4.20 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 3.97 (1H, brs), 3.85 (1H, d, J=6.3 Hz), 3.47 (1H, brs), 2.49 (1H, ddd, J=7.3, 9.6, 14.5 Hz), 2.28 (1H, dd, J=9.0, 15.3 Hz), 2.24 (2H, q, J=7.2 Hz), 2.23 (3H, s), 2.20 (3H, s), 2.16 (1H, dd, J=15.4, 9.0 Hz), 1.97 (3H, s), 1.91 (1H, m), 1.85 (3H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.76 (3H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 1.20 (3H, s), 1.08 (3H, t, J=8.1 Hz), 1.04 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 846.3, [M+K]+ 862.3.
Steps 1-6: Being the same as the procedures described in Steps 1-6 of Example 10. It was obtained as a side product in Step 6 of Example 10, 27% yield.
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.29-7.42 (5H, m), 6.59 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.46 (1H, q, J=6.7 Hz), 6.11 (1H, t, J=8.7 Hz), 5.58 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 5.41 and 5.40 (2H, overlapped), 5.24 (1H, s), 4.99 (1H, s), 4.92 (2H, brs), 4.67 (1H, d, J=1.8 Hz), 4.51 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 4.23 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz), 3.95 (1H, brs), 3.84 (1H, d, J=6.3 Hz), 3.48 (1H, brs), 3.11 (1H, d, J=15.9 Hz), 3.03 (1H, d, J=15.0 Hz), 2.49-2.53 (1H, m), 2.17-2.29 (3H, m), 2.22 (3H, s), 2.12 (1H, dd, J=9.0, 15.4 Hz), 1.92 (1H, m), 1.87 (3H, s), 1.85 (3H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.78 (3H, s), 1.76 (3H, d, J=7.2 Hz), 1.19 (3H, s), 1.08 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.01 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 846.3.3, [M+K]+ 862.3.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (20.6 mg,0.0213 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, m-methylbenzoic acid (58 mg, 0.426 mmol), PP (4 mg, 0.027 mmol) and DCC (87.7 mg, 0.425 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (8.1 mg, 44.4% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.89-7.93 (2H, m), 7.28-7.41 (7H, m), 6.62 (1H, d, J=9.3 Hz), 6.44 (1H, q, J=6.6 Hz), 6.13 (1H, t, J=8.4 Hz), 5.66 and 5.62 (2H, overlapped), 5.45 (1H, dd, J=7.2, 10.8 Hz), 5.28 (1H, s), 4.92 (1H, d, J=9.6 Hz), 4.71 (1H, d, J=1.8 Hz), 4.32 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.21 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 3.96 (1H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 3.96 (1H, brs, overlapped), 3.57 (1H, brs), 2.48-2.58 (1H, m), 2.43 (3H, s), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.25 (2H, q, J=7.5 Hz), 2.20-2.30 (2H, m, overlapped), 1.91 to 1.96 (1H, m), 1.85 (3H, s), 1.82 (6H, s), 1.72-1.74 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.21 (3H, s), 1.08 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.08 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 882.4.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (12.3 mg, 0.0127 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, m-cyanobenzoic acid (18.6 mg, 0.127 mmol), PP (1.2 mg, 0.0081 mmol) and DCC (26.22 mg, 0.127 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (6 mg, 54.4% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 8.43 (1H, s), 8.36 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 7.90 (1H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 7.67 (1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 7.32-7.42 (5H, m), 6.53 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz), 6.50 (1H, q, J=6.6 Hz), 6.16 (1H, t, J=8.7 Hz), 5.65 and 5.63 (2H, overlapped), 5.47 (1H, dd, J=4.8, 11 Hz), 5.31(1H, s), 4.93 (1H, d, J=9.0 Hz), 4.71 (1H, d, J=2.4 Hz), 4.25 (1H, d, J=7.5 Hz), 4.19 (1H, d, J=8.9 Hz), 4.00 (1H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 2.46-2.58 (1H, m), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.26 (2H, q, J=7.8 Hz), 2.22-2.29 (2H, m, overlapped), 1.92-1.97 (1H, m), 1.85 (6H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.72 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.22 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.08 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 893.4, [M+K]+ 909.4.
Steps 1-6 are similar to the procedures described in Steps 1-6 of Example 7, except that in-methoxybenzoic acid in Step 6 was substituted by 2-butenoic acid.
2′-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2-debenzoyl-10-triethylsilyl-7-propionyl-cephalomannine (37.9 mg, 0.039 mmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of toluene, then 2-butenoic acid (33.57 mg, 0.39 mmol), PP (5.78 mg, 0.039 mmol) and DCC (80.5 mg, 0.39 mmol) were added. After reacting at 65° C. for 10 h, 0.1 ml methanol was added, then filtered. The solid was washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to dryness, followed by a silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1). The resulting product was contaminated with impurities such as DCU, and said product was deprotected, without a further purification, as follows. The product was dissolved in 1.4 ml of acetonitrile, then pyridine (0.683 ml) and HF (0.375 ml) were added sequentially. After reacting at room temperature for 24 h, 30 ml of ethyl acetate was added, then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×20 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×50 ml). The ethyl acetate layers were combined, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The ethyl acetate layer was evaporated to dryness. And a silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane:ethyl acetate:acetone=8:3:2) was carried out to yield the title product (20.4 mg, 69% of total yield over two steps).
1H (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.32-7.40 (5H, m), 7.10 (1H, dq, J=7.8, 15.1 Hz), 6.58 (1H, d, J=9.3 Hz), 6.46 (1H, q, J=6.9 Hz), 6.14 (1H, t, J=8.4 Hz), 5.88 (1H, d, J=15.1 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J=2.4, 9.3 Hz), 5.46 (1H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 5.43 (1H, dd, J=7.8, 10.7 Hz), 5.26 (1H, s), 4.92 (1H, dd, J=2.2, 9.3 Hz), 4.68 (1H, d, J=2.4 Hz), 4.44 (1H, d, J=8.4 Hz), 4.20 (1H, d, J=9.3 Hz), 3.96 (1H, brs), 3.87 (1H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 3.44 (1H, brs), 2.46-2.53 (1H, m), 2.26 (3H, s), 2.22-2.31 (2H, m, overlapped), 1.96 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 1.92 (1H, m, overlapped), 1.88 (3H, s), 1.80 (3H, s), 1.79 (3H, s), 1.76 (3H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 1.20 (3H, s), 1.08 (3H, t, J=6.9 Hz), 1.04 (3H, s). ESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+ 832.3.
Experiment 1. Cytotoxicity Screening Assay at Cell Level of Compounds of this Invention
Tumor cells at log phase were incubated on 96-well plates at a density of 1˜1.2×104 cells/ml, 100 μl/well. 24 h later, treatment cells were exposed to the tested agents at different concentrations. Each tested agents had 4˜5 doses, and each dose had at least 3 parallel wells. Control cells were exposed to solvents in the same volume with treat agents. Cells were cultured at 37° C. in a cell incubator with 5% CO2 and 95% air atmosphere. After 4 days of culture, the incubation medium was removed, then 200 μl 0.2% MTT (prepared by RPMI 1640) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37° C. for 4 hours. The supernatant was discarded and dissolved the resulting formazen product with 200 μl DMSO in each well. The absorbance at a reference wavelength of 450 nm and a test wavelength of 570 nm was read on a microplate reader after tenderly shaking. Calculated drug inhibitory rate using the following equation and IC50, taking solvent exposure tumor cells as control cells.
(results are listed in Table 1)
Source: Animal breeding field of the institute of Laboratory Animal Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Genera: BALB/c (nu-nu) nude mice
Certification Number: Beijing animal permission No. 017
Weight: 19-22 g
Gender: ♀
Animal numbers of each group: 6-8 each group
Breeding environment: SPF
After one-week accommodation, animals were given subcutaneous implantation of the human lung adenocarcinoma A549 or the human ovarian cancer A2780 or the human gastric carcinoma BGC-823 cells. Animals were grouped randomly (d0) when the tumors reached 100-300 mm3. Daily i.p. administration of Taxol (10 mg/kg) and example 8 (5 mg/kg) on the human lung adenocarcinoma A549-nude mice-xenograft tumor from d0 to d4 for totally 5 times; Taxol (30 mg/kg) on the human ovarian cancer A2780-nude mice-xenograft tumor from d0 to d3 for totally 4 times and on the human gastric carcinoma BGC-823 nude mice-xenograft tumor from d0 to d2 for totally 3 times; example 8 (5 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg) on both the human ovarian cancer A2780 and BGC-823 nude mice-xenograft tumor from d0 to d3 for totally 4 times was initiated. Animal weights and tumor measurements were taken every 2 weeks and recorded. At the end of the study (d30 or d35), nude mice were euthanized and weighed. After the animals were sacrificed, tumor tissue was cut and weighed. Tumor volume was determined using the following equation:
V=½×a×b2
wherein a represents length while b represents width
Taxol can inhibit the growth of the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549, the human ovarian cancer cell strain A2780, Lewis lung cancer and the human gastric carcinoma cell strain BGC-823 nude mice-xenograft tumor. The compound of example 8 has a stronger effect on the human lung adenocarcinoma cell strain A549, the human ovarian cancer cell strain A2780, Lewis lung cancer nude mice-xenograft tumor than taxol. The inhibitory effect on the human gastric carcinoma cell strain BGC-823 nude mice-xenograft tumor of the compound of example 8 is equal to taxol.
This application is the national phase under §371 of International Application PCT/CN2007/003235, filed on Nov. 15, 2007.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2007/003235 | 11/15/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/3/2010 |
