1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to loudspeakers, and in particular, to a diaphragm for a loudspeaker that significantly improves the quality of sound and the usable life of the loudspeaker.
2. Related Art
A typical loudspeaker, as shown in
Designers have tended to take two paths to solve the cone break-up problem. For small diaphragms such as those found in dome tweeters, aluminum and titanium are commonly used. These titanium and aluminum diaphragms typically feature a thin anodized layer to provide a specific color to the visible surface, or to protect the metal from sunlight, humidity, or moisture. In contrast, for larger diaphragms, such as those found in subwoofers, softer materials such as polymers or papers are commonly used.
When using metal diaphragms, the dome dimensions can be manipulated such that the first natural modes of the dome are above the frequency range of human hearing.
For larger diaphragms, softer materials such as polymers or papers are commonly used. These materials have several natural modes in the band in which they operate. However, the internal damping of these materials is high enough so that most of these modes do not cause audible coloration. The remaining modes are either compensated for in other parts of the loudspeaker system design, resulting in increased costs, or are not addressed at all, resulting in lower performance.
As an alternative to metal, paper and polymers, ceramic materials such as alumina or magnesia may be used. These ceramic materials offer significantly higher stiffness numbers and slightly better internal losses than typical metals such as titanium or aluminum. As a result, the natural modes of diaphragms made of these materials are moved higher in frequency and reduced in amplitude and, thus, reduce audible coloration. Unfortunately, pure ceramics are very brittle and are prone to shattering when used as loudspeaker diaphragms. Additionally, making diaphragms of appropriate dimensions can be very expensive. As a result, pure ceramic loudspeaker diaphragms have not become common.
Table I shows the structural parameters for several common diaphragm materials.
As yet another alternative to metal, paper or ceramic diaphragms, some designers have designed diaphragms that are made of both ceramic and metal. These diaphragms are formed by applying a skin of alumina or ceramic on each side of the aluminum core or substrate. The alumina thus supplies the strength and the aluminum substrate supplies the resistance to shattering. It has high internal frequency losses. The resulting composite material is less dense and less brittle than traditional ceramics, yet is significantly stiffer, and has better damping than titanium. It also resists moisture and sunlight better than any polymer and is at least as good as other metals for providing such resistance.
These ceramic/metal cones are typically 3 mils. thick with a 2.6 mils. thick substrate of aluminum and 0.2 mil. thick layers of alumina one on each side of the substrate. In these prior art ceramic/metal cones, the metal substrate represented approximately 87% of the total thickness of the cone. Because of the prior art methods of manufacturing the cones, the amount of ceramic that could be applied to the metal substrate was limited to a depth of about 1/10 of a mil and therefore the quality that could be achieved through this method was similarly limited. Thus, a need exists for a method of anodizing the metal substrate that will allow for a depth of more than 1/10 of a mil of ceramic on each side of the cone and thereby reduce the representative amount of metal in the cone.
This invention relates to a speaker diaphragm that is formed of a matrix, or layers, of a light metal substrate such as aluminum, positioned between two ceramic layers, preferably aluminum oxide (Al2,O3). The speaker diaphragm is first formed from the metal substrate. A layer of ceramic is then placed on each side of the metal substrate at a depth greater than 1/10 of a mil through known anodizing methods. By anodizing at depths greater than 1/10 of mil, a diaphragm with the thickness of the metal substrate less than 87% of the total thickness of the diaphragm can be formed.
The invention further provides for a loudspeaker diaphragm, where the diaphragm is a composite material formed of at least two layers of ceramic material having a metal substrate therebetween and where the thickness of the metal substrate is no more than 86% of the thickness of the composite material.
Other designs, structures, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional designs, structures, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the figure are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
In
The diaphragm or cone 38 is first formed by using standard metal forming techniques to form the metal substrate into the desired shape of the diaphragm 38. The diaphragm 38 is then anodized in a well-known manner. The technique of forming the cone 38 prior to anodizing the metal allows for deeper anodizing techniques to be used to form the cone 38.
As stated earlier,
The graph of
A 4″ mid-range speaker may be used as an example of how to make a ceramic metal matrix diaphragm. The basic shape of the diaphragm is shown in
Although ceramic/metal/ceramic speakers having a typical thickness of about 3 mils. have their best performance when the speaker is made up of 1 mil. ceramic, 1 mil. metal and 1 mil. ceramic, it has been found that an important aspect in increasing the speaker performance is that the ceramic layers be about 1 mil. or greater. Consequently, it has been disclosed that speakers with very good performance characteristics can be achieved with speakers of all sizes that have at least 1 mil. of anodizing of each surface, even though the thickness of the metal core is significantly greater than 1 mil.
As examples only, excellent results have been obtained by stamping out the shape of a tweeter speaker from standard gauge 5 mils. sheet metal such as aluminum and then deep anodizing at least ½ mil. of the metal on each surface. The resulting tweeter diaphragm formed of a composite material will then have a 1 mil. ceramic (Al2O3) layer on one surface, a 4 mil. core and a 1 mil. ceramic (Al2O3) layer on the other surface. Similarly excellent results were obtained stamping out a mid-range speaker form from standard gauge 8 mil. metal and anodized to obtain a composite speaker having a 1 mil. layer of ceramic, a 7 mil. core and a 1 mil. layer of ceramic. Excellent results were also achieved by deep anodizing 2 mils. of metal on each surface of an 8 mil. aluminum form to obtain a composite diaphragm having a 4 mil. layer of ceramic, a 4 mil. core and another 4 mil. layer of ceramic.
Using the same techniques a woofer speaker form can be stamped from standard gauge 20 mil. metal and anodized to obtain a composite speaker having a 1 mil. layer of ceramic, a 19 mil. core and a 1 mil. layer of ceramic. In the past, the anodizing depth was limited to about 1/10 of a mil. By using the thicker standard gauge metal and deep anodizing to at least 1 mil., loudspeaker quality may be improved while lowering manufacturing costs.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/483,291 filed Jan. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. 6,404,897, that is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/226,087 filed Jan. 5, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,372.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3366748 | Ashworth | Jan 1968 | A |
3710040 | Swinehart | Jan 1973 | A |
4135601 | Tsukagoshi et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4344503 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4352961 | Kumada et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4410768 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4431873 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4639283 | Nakamura | Jan 1987 | A |
4726443 | Ugaji et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4772513 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5135582 | Mochizuki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
6327372 | Devantier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6404897 | Devantier et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020141610 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09483291 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 10041551 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09226087 | Jan 1999 | US |
Child | 09483291 | US |