An embodiment of present invention relates generally to the manufacturing of ceramic labial/lingual orthodontic clear aligner attachments (CCAAs) that create added retention for clear aligners used for straightening the teeth and correcting malocclusion. More specifically, an embodiment of the invention relates to the methodology of direct manufacture of customized ceramic labial/lingual orthodontic clear aligner attachments by using a ceramic slurry-based additive manufacturing (AM) technology.
A need arises for more efficient and accurate techniques for creating custom lingual and labial ceramic clear aligner attachments, and more aesthetic labial Clear Aligner Attachments (CAAs). Currently, CAAs for tray aligner treatment are fabricated from a variety of filled and unfilled, shaded, or translucent, bonding materials (such as dental composite) similar to that used to attach conventional orthodontic CAAs to teeth. They are formed by inserting this bonding material into a pre-designed and fabricated aligner-like tray that has the attachment mold included in its shape, and then using a bonding system similar to orthodontic CAA bonding to adhere the CAA to the teeth. This results in excess bonding material, or “flash” that then needs to be ground off with a drill in order to assure a proper fit of the subsequent orthodontic aligner trays. During the process of flash removal, often the attachment itself is inadvertently contacted by the drill bit and its shape is mistakenly altered, resulting in an unintentional CAA shape that doesn't conform as well with the aligner trays.
During the everyday insertion and removal of the aligner trays, the tray abrades the attachment in such a way as to actually alter the CAA's shape. Often, these attachments must be removed and replaced during aligner refinement procedures because of the significance of the wear on the CAA from this insertion and removal abrasion.
During the removal of CAAs made from bonding material, a high speed drill is utilized to grind off the CAA and remove any residual flash present on the tooth surface. This results in enamel also being removed from the tooth surface, as it is not within the technical ability of the dentist to adequately discern the boundary between the layer of bonding material and the enamel surface.
There is a need for more efficient and accurate techniques for creating custom lingual and labial ceramic clear aligner attachments that are more easily and accurately placed and more durable during active orthodontic treatment. After treatment, a more effective removal system of these attachments would include less polishing of the tooth surface with the unwanted side effect of damage to the enamel of the tooth.
The proposed invention utilizes Ceramic CAAs (CCAAs) that may be fabricated by ceramic slurry-based Additive Manufacturing (AM) and may be bonded to the tooth with an unfilled/filled bonding resin material already in use in dentistry. These CCAAs will be placed in an indirect transfer tray and then bonded to the teeth surfaces utilizing the unfilled or partially filled bonding resin.
An embodiment of the present devices and methods may be used to solve problems occurring in the current methods of creating resin-based CCAAs. For example, in one embodiment, it may provide a direct manufacturing method of customized lingual/labial CCAAs by utilizing any number of ceramic slurry-based AM technologies, examples of which may include digital light processing (DLP), laser photopolymerization stereolithography, jet printing (including particle jetting, nanoparticle jetting), layer slurry depositioning (LSD), or laser-induced slip casting. A slurry is defined as inorganic particles dispersed in a liquid, and may be photopolymerizable or may polymerize by other mechanisms. Likewise, similar methods may be used to create metal CCAAs wherein the inorganic materials in the slurry are metal. Examples of items that may be produced include customized labial/lingual CCAAs according to individual clear aligner (CA) retention needs on individual teeth, which may have direct tooth-matching retentive features designed into the CCAA base.
The present devices and methods may provide several advantages over the current methodology. 1) The removal of excessive bonding material will be significantly minimized-less filled resins may be used, which have a much thinner layer conformation than filled resins. 2) CCAAs will also result in a much more accurate and precise shape versus classical resin-based CCAAs, as variances in the thickness of the bonding material will not be able to result in variances in the shape of the CCAA. 3) The CCAA will not be able to be inadvertently damaged or altered in its shape by the post-placement flash polishing procedure because there will be less flash and the ceramic material of which the OA is fabricated will be resistant to indentation by accidental contact with the drill during the polishing/flash removal process. The CCAA will be more exact in its shape because it will be formed first, by Additive Manufacturing (AM), and then may be adhered with a thinner adhesive. This results in less variability of shape than the current procedures where the technique of placement can greatly vary the shape of the OA. 5) Most importantly, the OA will not be susceptible to deformation in shape due to abrasion from constant insertion and removal of the aligner trays because the ceramic OA is much more resistant to abrasion.
For example, in an embodiment, a method of manufacturing pre-formed, customized, ceramic, labial/lingual orthodontic clear aligner attachments (CCAA) by additive manufacturing (AM) may comprise measuring dentition data of a profile of teeth of a patient, based on the dentition data, creating a three dimensional computer-assisted design (3D CAD) model of the patient's teeth using reverse engineering, and saving the 3D CAD model, designing a 3D CAD structure model for one or more CCAA on various parts of each tooth, importing data related to the 3D CAD CCAA structure model into an AM machine, directly producing the CCAA in the ceramic slurry-based AM machine by layer manufacturing to form a patient-specific CCAA by an indirect bonding method, the patient-specific CCAA adapted to the patient's teeth.
In embodiments, two CCAAs may comprise mirrored structures adapted to produce torque movement. An angle of a working edge of each CCAA may be adapted to provide the desired torque for a particular tooth structure. A working edge for aligner retention may have an angle relative to the tooth structure of 90 degrees plus or minus and angle of the desired torque. A notch in the attachment edge may be adapted to aid in debonding with pliers such as ligature-cutting pliers. The CCAA may comprise a button adapted to be used to rotate the tooth through force applied by the aligner. A force-rotational relationship may be dependent on a thickness and angulation of the CCAA button. The CCAA may have a fracture groove in a middle vertical third of the bracket and is a adapted to provide predictable CCAA breakage. The fracture groove may include a weakened area including a tooth curved depression in the bracket base in an occlusal-gingival direction. The fracture groove may match a contour of a tooth for that portion of the bracket positioning. The fracture groove may be constant in depth from the tooth surface. The fracture groove may have a depth of 0.10 mm to 1.2 mm, inclusive. The fracture groove may vary in depth from the tooth surface. The fracture groove may have a variance in depth of 1-50%, inclusive, of a distance from the tooth surface to a deepest part of fracture groove. The CCAA may have a positive indented or negative indented nomenclature in at least one side of the CCAA to denote which tooth and area of the tooth to which the CCAA is meant to be bonded. The nomenclature may include a tooth number. The tooth number may be in Palmer notation. The CCAA may have an attachment tube with a channel comprising a slot that does not require ligation adapted to be placed on a tooth for to accept a wire to move the tooth with or without a clear aligner. The channel may pass mesial-distal and may be consistent in cross-sectional measurement. The channel has a circular, rectangular, or square cross-section. The channels with square and rectangular cross-sections may have rounded corners of a selected radius. The method may further comprise placing two CCAAs via indirect bonding on a same tooth, wherein each CCAA has a channel, the CCAAs are separate, and have their channels aligned so that a wire passes through the channels on both CCAAs without deflection. An average cross-sectional area of the tube may be not greater than 0.50 mm2.
An embodiment of the present invention provides improved techniques for creating custom lingual or labial CCAAs.
An exemplary flowchart of an embodiment a direct manufacturing process 100 of lingual or labial orthodontic CCAAs by digital light processing is shown in
In 104, based on the given dentition data, a 3D CAD model of the measured teeth is constructed based on the dentition data and saved in the computer in a typical file format, such as the .stl file format. The exterior structure of teeth is complicated, usually including irregular curves. The software may then be used to re-arrange the teeth in the model to the desired treatment outcomes that may be based on the long-axis of a tooth.
In 106, additional information, such as the desired shape and tooth location of the CCAAs are determined.
In 108, the CCAA is designed by the software or chosen from a list of options by the clinician based on the input 3D CAD model of the measured teeth, the model of the desired treatment outcomes, and the anticipated limitations of the CA and its ability to track on the teeth throughout treatment. The output of the design process may be a 3D CAD model. Such a 3D CAD model may be designed for a single lingual/labial CCAA structure, including the indirect bonding (IDB) tray.
3D CAD CCAA structure models of labial or lingual CCAAs may be designed by computer according to the orthodontic requirements, CA material considerations, and teeth morphology.
3D CAD CCAA structure models are processed to generate manufacturing control data for use by the production equipment. For example, where ceramic slurry-based AM equipment is used to produce the CCAAs, the software slices the 3D CAD CCAA structure models to separate it into thin layers and get the horizontal section model for each layer. Based on this section model, the ceramic slurry-based AM equipment can directly produce CCAAs, ensuring the shape of each layer is consistent to the 3D CAD structure data. For example, the thickness of such layers may be about 20 μm to about 50 μm (micrometers or microns) with a manufacturing accuracy of about 5 μm to about 60 μm by using between-layer additive error compensation.
Returning to 108 of
Digital light processing (DLP) is another 3D additive manufacturing (AM) process that works by stacking layers of a photocurable resin with an Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) or Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) solid loading, and followed by a thermal debinding and sintering step. The higher resolution of this process is made possible by the LED light's digital mirror device (DMD) chip and optics used. Lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM) has improved this process making it more accurate with higher resolution (40 μm) and rigidity. The new LCM process involves the selective curing of a photosensitive resin containing homogenously dispersed oxide or glass ceramic particles that can be fabricated at very high resolution due to imaging systems which enable the transfer of layer information by means of ever-improving LED technology.
In 110, post-processing may then be applied. For example, a thermal treatment (for binder burnout) and a sintering process may be applied to achieve optimal or improved ceramic density. For example, the debinding and sintering phase may include removing the green CCAA from the device, exposing the blank to a furnace to decompose the polymerized binder (debinding), and sintering of the ceramic material.
Examples of raw materials of the CCAAs may include powder of high strength oxides, nitrides and carbides ceramics including but not limited to: Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3), Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2), Alumina toughened Zirconia (ATZ), Zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), Lithiumdisilicate, Leucitesilicate, Nitrides (e.g. SiN4), and mono- or polycrystalline ceramic. The base of CCAA may be adhered to the tooth surface and the CCAA surface may be matched to matching indentations within the CA. According to requirements of mechanical properties, different composition of material may be required for the layers during the DLP manufacturing process. After being built up, the CCAAs may have a gradient and better performance.
Further, the CCAA surface may be processed based on clinical demand.
In 112, the CCAA is ready to be placed.
Typically, the thickness 202 of the CCAA pad 204 may extend less than 2.0 mm for lingual CCAAs and less than 2.5 for labial CCAAs from the surface of the tooth, with a labial and lingual minimum extension of 0.25 mm. The CCAA pad 204 may be adhered to the tooth surface with well-known dental adhesives that may be unfilled dental resins or partially filled dental resins. Depending upon the manufacturing process used, different ceramics or composition of powder may be required for the layers. For example, if a selective laser melting manufacturing process is used, an LED light source may be used for the selective curing of a photosensitive resin containing the oxide or glass ceramic particles. Different layers may use different ceramics or compositions of powder.
The CCAA pad 204, which holds or connects the CCAA to the tooth surface, may be designed specifically according to the tooth surface profile, instead of a generalized gridding pattern. The customized CCAAs can meet individual case demand, such as increased vertical tracking for upper lateral incisors or for lower premolars to level the curve of Spee or reduce overbite. For example, as shown in
The neutral plane 804 of the draft may be oriented towards the tooth structure and may be flat or itself contoured to the shape of the tooth surface to which it is meant to be bonded. While any degree of retention would achieve the intended retentive interaction with bonding cement, a range of designed draft angles may be utilized to compensate for the limitations of a specific 3D printing process.
A side view of an exemplary printed CCAA 700 is shown in
Finite-element analysis has revealed that mesial-distal forces on the sides of the attachment result in a concentration of forces in the middle third of the attachment base. The groove is defined as the area of removed material from where forces would have been most concentrated. The addition of this “groove” lowers the forces required to predictably create an attachment fracture down the middle vertical third of the attachment, which aids in debonding the ceramic attachment from the tooth. The weakened area, and the fracture force may be optimized by adjusting the dimensions of the fracture groove and/or the auxiliary fracture groove.
As shown in
CCAA 700 may further include an attachment such as a hook 1002, shown in
Using the ceramic slurry-based AM technique can turn the designed model into a ceramic product rapidly. The CCAA manufacturing involves few steps and can be done on site, saving time and cost.
The described techniques may be used to manufacture CCAAs from various Oxide ceramics and light-curable materials such as Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) and Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2).
Many patients desire a CCAA that matches the color of the tooth to which the CCAA is attached. As another example, embodiments of the present invention may provide the capability to produce translucent CCAAs, which may provide still improved appearance. Additionally, embodiments of the present invention may provide the capability to produce CCAAs in a shade closely matched to the patient's tooth shades, which may be the same shade or matched to individual teeth as the tooth shades vary.
The described techniques may be made cost-effective to the point where an individual orthodontic practice could purchase the required equipment and software.
Ceramic slurry-based AM has many advantages for orthodontic CCAA fabrication over selective laser sintering/melting (SLM) which uses thermal energy, and 3-D printing (3DP) systems that use a binder and polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs). For example, ceramic slurry-based AM may provide higher surface quality, better object resolution, and improved mechanical properties. PDCs structured using light in a stereolithographic or mask exposure process may also be used as a ceramic AM method for CCAA fabrication.
Custom lingual CCAAs may be fabricated by this method, which may receive a pre-bent customized archwire as described by US 2007/0015104 A1. Custom labial CCAAs may also receive pre-bent wires.
The procedure for the layering additive manufacturing (AM) methodology of the labial/lingual orthodontic CCAAs by ceramic slurry-based Amiss as follows.
An example of ceramic slurry-based AM is the lithography-based digital light processing (DLP) technique described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,623,264 B2, which is incorporated herein by reference, but may be briefly summarized as follows: a light-polymerizable material, the material being located in at least one trough, having a particularly light-transmissive, horizontal bottom, is polymerized by illumination on at least one horizontal platform, the platform having a pre-specified geometry and projecting into a trough, in an illumination field, wherein the platform is displaced vertically to form a subsequent layer, light-polymerizable material is then added to the most recently formed layer, and repetition of the foregoing steps leads to the layered construction of the orthodontic CCAA in the desired prescription/mold, which arises from the succession of layer geometries determined from the CAD software. The trough can be shifted horizontally to a supply position, and the supply device brings light-polymerizable material at least to an illumination field of the trough bottom, before the at least one trough is shifted to an illumination position in which the illumination field is located below the platform and above the illumination unit, and illumination is carried out, creating a “green CCAA”.
The light-polymerizable material or photo-reactive suspension (slurry) can be prepared based on commercially available di- and mono-functional methacrylates. An example material might be a slurry blend of 0.01-0.025 wt % of a highly reactive photoinitiator, 0.05-6 wt % a dispersant, an absorber, and 2-20 wt % of a non-reactive diluent. A solid loading of high strength Oxide ceramics such as Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) and Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) powder can be used, but this process may extend to other ceramic materials.
An exemplary block diagram of a computer system 500, in which the processes shown above may be implemented, is shown in
Input/output circuitry 504 provides the capability to input data to, or output data from, computer system 500. For example, input/output circuitry may include input devices, such as keyboards, mice, touchpads, trackballs, scanners, etc., output devices, such as video adapters, monitors, printers, etc., and input/output devices, such as, modems, etc. Network adapter 506 interfaces computer system 500 with a network 510. Network 510 may be any public or proprietary LAN or WAN, including, but not limited to the Internet.
Memory 508 stores program instructions that are executed by, and data that are used and processed by, CPU 502 to perform the functions of computer system 500. Memory 508 may include, for example, electronic memory devices, such as random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, etc., and electro-mechanical memory, such as magnetic disk drives, tape drives, optical disk drives, etc., which may use an integrated drive electronics (IDE) interface, or a variation or enhancement thereof, such as enhanced IDE (EIDE) or ultra-direct memory access (UDMA), or a small computer system interface (SCSI) based interface, or a variation or enhancement thereof, such as fast-SCSI, wide-SCSI, fast and wide-SCSI, etc., or Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA), or a variation or enhancement thereof, or a fiber channel-arbitrated loop (FC-AL) interface.
The contents of memory 508 varies depending upon the function that computer system 500 is programmed to perform. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
As shown in
It is important to note that while aspects of the present invention may be implemented in the context of a fully functioning data processing system, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the processes of an embodiment of the present invention are capable of being distributed in the form of a computer program product including a computer readable medium of instructions. Examples of non-transitory computer readable media include storage media, examples of which include, but are not limited to, floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, RAM, and, flash memory.
Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that there are other embodiments that are equivalent to the described embodiments. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/683,816, filed Jun. 12, 2018, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4470809 | Klepacki | Sep 1984 | A |
4639218 | Jones et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5242304 | Truax et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5366372 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5439379 | Hansen | Aug 1995 | A |
5879156 | DeLeo | Mar 1999 | A |
6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217322 | Kesling | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6830450 | Knopp et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846179 | Chapouland et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7347688 | Kopelman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7698014 | Dunne et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8356993 | Marston | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8623264 | Rohner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8694142 | Yang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
10241499 | Griffin | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10786334 | Griffin, III et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10864675 | Homa et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10967564 | Homa et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11413117 | Griffin, III et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11478337 | Griffin, III et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020106604 | Phan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150857 | Orikasa | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030152884 | Wiechmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165790 | Castro et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198911 | Knopp | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040253562 | Knopp | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023710 | Brodkin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050170308 | Lai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214708 | Antignano et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050277082 | Christoff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008761 | Allred | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060127835 | Soo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060204918 | Voudouris | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210942 | Pace et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070015104 | Wiechmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070111152 | Primus et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070207435 | Devanathan | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080015727 | Dunne et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080085486 | Busch | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113311 | Rolf | May 2008 | A1 |
20080153051 | Hart et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090017411 | Pospisil et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100129764 | Pospisil | May 2010 | A1 |
20100285419 | Cinader, Jr. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324715 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110136072 | Li | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110309554 | Liska et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310370 | Rohner et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311933 | Parker | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120015315 | Wiechmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120129118 | Moon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129120 | Foerster | May 2012 | A1 |
20130029283 | Matty | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130081271 | Farzin-Nia et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130095446 | Andreiko et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140107823 | Huang | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134562 | Wu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140170591 | El-Silblani | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140178830 | Widu | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140227382 | Liska et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140234527 | Huang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140302450 | Carriere Lluch et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150017596 | Wong et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150037747 | Choi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150182307 | Yick | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216626 | Ranjbar | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223914 | Sabilla et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150313687 | Blees et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160038258 | Sabilla et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160206404 | Rodrigues | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160256240 | Shivapuja et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160279869 | Gruber et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160299996 | Huang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160346063 | Schulhof | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361141 | Tong et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361142 | Tong et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007360 | Kopelman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007368 | Boronkay | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049534 | Soo et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170135787 | Lopes | May 2017 | A1 |
20170196666 | Böhm et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170231721 | Akeel | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170319296 | Webber | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333161 | Dinh | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180042705 | Howe | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180125612 | Mashouf, Sr. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180148378 | Mayr et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180168776 | Webber | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180318046 | Lee | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180325626 | Huang | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180354860 | Wang | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190090989 | Jo | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190117340 | Oh et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190142551 | Dickenson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190328493 | Griffin, III et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190336247 | Raby | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190374307 | Griffin, III et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190377327 | Griffin, III et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20210077224 | Griffin, III et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20220218443 | Griffin, III et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220304778 | Griffin, III et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102014107330 | Nov 2015 | DE |
2425798 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2881075 | Jun 2015 | EP |
3170472 | May 2017 | EP |
2922753 | May 2009 | FR |
100989407 | Oct 2010 | KR |
208345 | Apr 2011 | PL |
WO 0147405 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 2006079459 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007115268 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008119119 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009020282 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2015178655 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO 2017194916 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2018005072 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2019241251 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang et al., Solid Freefrom Fabrication of Permanent Dental Restorations via Slurry Micro-Extrusion, 2005, The American Ceramic Society, 89, 346-349 (Year: 2005). |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,696. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2019 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718. |
Vickie Parrish Foster, An Overview of Dental Anatomy, 2019, dentalcare.com, (Year 2019). |
Cima et al., Slurry-Based 3DP and Fine Ceramic Components (2001), Proceedings of the 12th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 216-223; http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/2001TOC (Year 2001). |
Dr. Kyle Fagala, What is indirect Bonding? And why should you care?, Nov. 20, 2014, Saddle Creek Orthodontics (Year 2014). |
Wang et al. Solid Freeform Fabrication of Permanent Dental Restorations via slurry Micro-Extrusion (2006). The American Ceramic Society, 346-349. (2006). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 3, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36556, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 28, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36557, 5 pages. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36556, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 28, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36557, 3 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 28, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36558, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 28, 2019, received in International Application No. PCT/US19/36558, 5 pages. |
John C. Bennett, Fundamentals of Bracket Selection, 2nd ed. London, UK. 2010, pp. 14, 42. |
William R. Proffit DDS PhD, Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO. Mosby Elsevier; 2013, pp. 369, 374. |
Wohlers Report 2001, Part 6, p. 144. |
Interview with Johannes Homa, CEO of Lithoz GmbH, Advanced Manufacturing Insight, Aug. 11, 2014. |
Silver M, Griffin AC, Jr., Azzopardi L, Masoud MI, Tokede O, Griffin AC, 3rd. Novel methods reveal that parallelism contributes to the functional vertical slot dimension in ceramic and metal brackets. The Angle orthodontist. Nov. 2018;88(6):812-818. |
Krey KF, Darkazanly N, Kuhnert R, Ruge S. 3D-printed orthodontic brackets—proof of concept. Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19(4):351-362. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2020 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718. |
“3D Printing I Additive Manufacturing Using Polymers—Complete Guide, URL: https://omnexus.specialchem.com/selection-guide/3d-printi ng-and-additive-manufacturing-polymers-and-processes?p= 1 (Year: 2020)”. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2020 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,696. |
Response, filed Feb. 20, 2020, to Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,696. |
Examiner Summary of Interview dated May 29, 2020, interview conducted May 22, 2020 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,696. |
Response, filed Sep. 30, 2020, to Final Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2020 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718. |
Response, filed Feb. 10, 2020, to Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2019 received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718 (24 Pages). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/035,073 (24 Pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2021 in connection with European Application No. 19792830.2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 30, 2019 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/029020. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 5, 2020 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2019/029020. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/962,261. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/962,261. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/962,261. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,718. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees Due dated Dec. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/035,073. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190374308 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62683816 | Jun 2018 | US |