The invention relates to a ceramic refractory stopper (a stopper device) for controlling a flow of molten metal at an outlet opening of a metallurgical vessel, such as a tundish.
The generic type of ceramic refractory stoppers comprises a rod-shaped stopper body, one end of which being designed for fixation to a corresponding lifting mechanism while the other end of which is provided by the so called stopper head. The rod-shaped stopper body defines a central longitudinal axis.
It is well known in steel casting to arrange such a stopper rod, which in many cases is a one-piece-stopper rod, in a vertical position, in order to vary the cross-sectional area of an associated outlet opening of a corresponding metallurgical vessel by said lifting action. Insofar any directions disclosed hereinafter, like “top”, “bottom”, “upper and lower ends” always refer to the vertical use position as shown in
Stopper rods of this type have also being used to introduce a gas, such as an inert gas, i. a. argon, into the molten steel for removing non-metallic inclusions from the molten melt.
According to EP 1188502 B1 the gas is fed along a central gas feeding line from the upper end of the stopper towards a stopper head. Typically this gas feeding line is provided by a central bore hole within the stopper body. EP 1188502 B1 provides various embodiments to continue the gas flow downwardly through the stopper head to its outer surface and further into the surrounding melt. According to the embodiment of
Accordingly, the gas leaves the stopper device in the direction of the central longitudinal axis. Around this exit area the corresponding metal melt has a relatively low velocity which has the disadvantage that the argon transport is slowed, down and so called clogging (deposition of solidified material) occurs around the exit opening of said gas channel at the outer surface of the stopper head.
According to the embodiment of
This design only reduces the occurrence of clogging. Solidified steel particles may close the corresponding gas channels.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a stopper device for flow control of molten metal from a vessel which avoids the above-mentioned disadvantages and improves the steel quality.
The invention starts from a conventional ceramic refractory stopper of the generic type mentioned above comprising a rod-shaped stopper body, defining a central longitudinal stopper axis, and at least one gas feeding line, extending within said stopper body towards a stopper head.
According to the invention further transport of the gas (downwardly into the stopper head and via at least one gas channel outlet opening into the melt) is achieved by the following design:
Contrary to the discrete gas channels (gas blowing holes) according to prior art a cylindrical gas channel is provided within a stopper head (also called the nose portion of the stopper body). Depending on the diameter of said cylindrical gas channel, especially at its one ring-shaped outlet opening, the gas is fed at a distinct distance to the lowermost point of the stopper head (in its use position) and insofar at a place where the metal melt passes with increased velocity.
This guarantees that the gas, leaving the stopper (stopper nose), is flushed away by the metal melt stream without the danger of clogging.
The inventive idea is based on the technical feature to provide a ring-shaped outlet opening of a gas channel at the outer surface of the lower end of the stopper body which corresponds to the lower outer surface of the stopper head (stopper nose), which typically has a curved design.
The gas slit should run at a certain distance to the central longitudinal axis of the stopper body, such that the gas leaves the stopper head at a position above the lowermost point of the stopper head, where the passing melt stream has a higher velocity. This radial distance should heat least ten times the width of said gas channel and can be 20 or 30 times larger. The specific size may be about 0.5-8 cm, for example 1-6 cm.
According to one embodiment the width of the gas channel, perpendicular to the gas feeding direction, is less than 1 mm, for example 0.6, 0.5, 0.4 or 0.3 mm and insofar much smaller than any discrete bore like gas channel according to prior art with a diameter of typically between 1 and 5 mm.
Due to the cylindrical geometry and the small width of the gas channel gas flow is effected between an inner and an outer hot surface, improving the heat exchange between stopper body and gas, which exits the gas channel with a much higher temperature compared with conventional prior art devices as mentioned. The hotter gas further avoids solidification of any melt at the gas channel exit as well as melt infiltration into the gas channel
As far as the invention refers to a “cylindrical gas channel” it should be noted that the term “cylindrical” does not necessarily means a cylinder of constant diameter although this is one possible embodiment.
Accordingly the invention provides various designs, such as:
Alternatives b) and c) include gas channels extending at least partially radially to the central longitudinal stopper axis. All gas channel designs include the feature of a ring-shaped gas outlet opening of said gas channel at the stopper head surface. The invention includes embodiments with more than one cylindrical gas channel in the stopper head region, which then being arranged concentrically, while the surrounding refractory parts are fixed to each other, for example by refractory bridges as will be described hereinafter.
As mentioned above conventional ceramic refractory stoppers can be manufactured as so called monoblock stoppers (one-piece stoppers). Such monoblock design may also be realised within the inventive concept but obviously refractory bridges must be provided along the cylindrical gas channel in order to avoid separation between the refractory material inside and outside the gas channel. In this respect it is known from gas purging plugs to insert a corresponding template within the ceramic material which template corresponds to the cylindrical design of the final gas channel and including holes along its wall section. During manufacturing of the stopper body, for example by pressing, especially isostatic pressing, the ceramic batch material then passes these holes, providing material (ceramic) bridges.
During subsequent firing of the pressed stopper the template material burns off, thus providing the desired cylindrical gas channel with monolithic refractory bridges as described before.
Another design of the new ceramic refractory stopper is characterized by an insert, arranged within the stopper head such that the insert provides one inner wall section of the gas channel while the stopper head provides the other, outer wall section of said cylindrical gas channel.
Various embodiments of designs of such insert may be realised.
According to one embodiment the insert comprises a first section, providing an inner surface of the cylindrical gas channel and an associated second section (on top), providing the boundary of said at least one gas feeding line, or, in an alternative, providing a second section with the said gas feeding line running there through. In other words, the gas feeding line is realised at its end next to and/or within the stopper nose between said insert and the inner wall of the stopper body (including the nose portion) as shown the attached drawing. This design allows to provide more than one gas feeding line continuing the gas feed into the cylindrical gas channel.
In order to realise the gas feeding line(s) and/or gas channel one or more corresponding template(s) may be installed as described before and burned off after moulding. Instead of a combustible template at least one of the corresponding surfaces may be covered by a combustible wax and/or other combustible materials such as a plastic foil.
This allows to pre-mould the insert, cover it by said combustible material and then have it pressed together with the stopper body for example in an isostatic press device. Combustion of a combustible material may be achieved during subsequent firing (sintering) of this ceramic stopper.
In order to achieve optimized gas flow one embodiment provides a rotationally symmetrical insert.
According to a further embodiment the insert may be profiled along its outer surface. The outer surface of said insert may provide at least one protrusion or at least one depression which fit with at least one corresponding depression or at least one corresponding protrusion along a corresponding inner surface of the stopper head to achieve a form fit connection between insert and stopper head and insofar to avoid loosening of said insert. Other tongue and groove connections and/or other fastening means like bolts may be used for the same purpose.
The technical effect of this design corresponds to the “refractory bridges” as mentioned above.
In case of said refractory bridges a continuous ceramic or chemical bonding may be realised between stopper body (including stopper head) and insert.
Further features of the invention will derive from the subclaims and the other application documents. The stopper may be realised by arbitrary combinations of design features disclosed if not explicitly excluded.
It should be noted that terms like “rod-shaped” etc. always refer to the manufactured technical product and insofar refer to corresponding technical features and are not used in a strong mathematical sense.
Prior art and the invention will now be described with respect to the attached schematic drawing, showing in:
The stopper design according to
At this point P a corresponding metal melt M has a relatively low velocity. This is the reason why a relative large gas bubble B may be formed around the outlet opening of the channel 18 and clogging occurs.
Concentrically to said axis A-A a cylindrical insert 30 of constant diameter is arranged within said stopper head and in extension of gas feeding line 16. Insert 30 has a first lower section 32 and a second upper section 34. Upper section 34 provides an inner boundary 34b of a lower section of feeding line 16, which is characterized in this section by three individual gas lines 16i, running vertically (and downwardly) towards the first lower section 32 of insert 30 at a distance to each other, here: at 120 degrees to each other. Therefore in the sectional view of
Upper section 34 is further characterized by a surface depression 34d into which a corresponding (radial) protrusion 14d of inner wall 12w of stopper body 12 enters in a form fit way so as to avoid disintegration of stopper body 12 (or stopper head 14 respectively) and insert 30.
The three gas lines 16i are in fluid communication with gas feeding line 16 and in fluid communication with a cylindrical gas channel 38 arranged between the lower part 32 of insert 30 and the corresponding inner wall section 12w of stopper head 14.
The flow of gas is as follows:
The gas flows along gas feeding line 16 downwards (arrow T), then into the three gas feeding lines 16i arranged between upper section 34 of insert 30 and inner wall 12w of stopper body 12 and finally along the cylindrical gas channel 38 before it leaves the stopper head 14 via its ring shaped gas outlet opening (with a diameter about 6 cm) at the free tower end of gas channel 38 and enters into the metal melt M.
Gas channel 38 has a width (perpendicular to axis A-A) of 0.6 mm and avoids the risk of melt infiltration, while at the same time allows the melt stream passing this ring shaped outlet opening, to flush away the escaping gas stream without any danger of clogging.
The embodiment of
The gas stream leaves this gas channel 38 in the direction of arrow G.
An alternative of the arrangement of insert 30 and gas channel 38 respectively is represented in
The stopper of
It may further be derived from
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11182436 | Sep 2011 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/062608 | 6/28/2012 | WO | 00 | 2/18/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/041258 | 3/28/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070210494 | Guillo | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100163586 | Funato | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007004958 | Aug 2008 | DE |
1188502 | Jan 2005 | EP |
2728491 | Jun 1996 | FR |
2008080397 | Apr 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Richard, “Optimization of casting stoppers”, Revue de Métallurgie, Apr. 2003, pp. 409-414, vol. 100, No. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140217654 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |