Cervical intervertebral prosthesis system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8062369
  • Patent Number
    8,062,369
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 8, 2008
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 22, 2011
    14 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Robert; Eduardo C
    • Comstock; David
    Agents
    • NuVasive, Inc.
    • Spangler; Jonathan
    • Jarvis; Marjorie
Abstract
A cervical intervertebral prosthesis system includes prostheses which each have a hinge with a predefined center of hinge movement. To permit better adaptation to the different hinge radii of the cervical intervertebral disks, the cervical intervertebral prostheses of the system include at least two different prostheses with different hinge radii.
Description
FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to cervical intervertebral prostheses which have a predefined center of the hinge movement. In a first known type of such prostheses, the center of the hinge movement is located inside the prosthesis (U.S. Pat. No. 5,425,773; EP-A-1166725). This does not correspond to the natural conditions which the prosthesis is intended to simulate. In another type of intervertebral prosthesis (FR-A-2718635), the hinge is formed by a pair of slide surfaces, the common center of curvature of which lies outside the prosthesis, specifically under it. This approximates to the natural conditions but is still too far remote from them.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is based on the awareness that the centers of the cervical intervertebral hinge movement are different from vertebra to vertebra (L. Penning: Functional Pathology of the Cervical Spine; Excerpta Medica 1968, pages 1-23). Starting out from this realization, the invention seeks to approximate the prosthetic hinge movement more closely to the natural conditions.


The invention achieves this aim by making available a set of cervical intervertebral prostheses which comprises at least two different prostheses with a different position of the center of the hinge movement. Depending on the position in question, the operating surgeon can select a suitable prosthesis from this set and thus ensure that the movement of the intervertebral joint fitted with the prosthesis is more akin to the natural conditions than was hitherto possible.


This applies especially when the intervertebral prostheses comprise a pair of slide surfaces for forming the hinge. In this case, the two different prostheses differ from one another in terms of the different radii of curvature of their slide surface pairs. According to the invention, a prosthesis intended for a pair of vertebrae lying more in the cranial direction ought to have a greater radius of curvature of its slide surfaces than does a prosthesis which is intended for a pair of vertebrae lying more in the caudal direction.


In some cases it may suffice if the prosthesis set comprises only two prostheses with a different radius of curvature of its slide surfaces, namely a prosthesis with a radius of curvature of its slide surfaces above a defined mean value and a prosthesis with a radius of curvature of its slide surfaces below a defined mean value. This mean value is expediently 18 mm. For example, a set can comprise a first prosthesis with a radius of curvature of its slide surfaces of 22 mm and another prosthesis with a radius of curvature of its slide surfaces of 14 mm. It is desirable to have a larger number of prostheses with a different slide surface radius, for example the set cited in the example just cited can be supplemented by a prosthesis with a slide surface radius of 18 mm and if appropriate a further prosthesis with a slide surface radius of 10 mm.


The invention also relates to a method for determining which intervertebral prosthesis from a plurality of intervertebral prostheses with different hinge radius is suitable for replacing a cervical intervertebral disk. This method is distinguished in that the hinge radius of the affected joint is determined and a prosthesis with a hinge radius approximating to this hinge radius is selected. In this context, the hinge radius is to be understood as the distance between the center of the hinge movement and the midpoint of the prosthesis. The method can be implemented by the physician. However, because of the existing damage, the physician will in general no longer be able to determine the movement characteristics of the joint that is to be replaced. He will therefore rely on the manufacturer of the prostheses carrying out suitable tests, whose results can also subsequently be consulted in the literature, and on said manufacturer then assigning the available prostheses, which are put together in sets, to specific intervertebral spaces. The table below shows an example of how the radii of curvature of the slide surfaces are assigned to the individual intervertebral spaces within defined size ranges (in millimeters).


















Intervertebral
“Large”
“Medium”
“Small”



space
series
series
series









C2/C3
22
20
18



C3/C4
22
18
18



C4/C5
18
18
16



C5/C6
18
14
14



C6/C7
14
14
12










As regards the use of small radii of curvature, it should be noted that here too the hinge center lies outside the prosthesis.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The sole FIGURE of the drawing depicts an illustrative embodiment to explain the terms used above.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An intervertebral prosthesis made up of a lower cover plate 11, an upper cover plate 12 and a prosthetic core 13 is fitted between the vertebral bodies 1 and 2. The prosthetic core 13 is held securely on the lower cover plate 11 by an undercut ledge 14, running along three sides of the prosthesis, and by a catch 15. With the upper cover plate 12, it forms a spherical slide surface pair 16 having a slide surface radius 17 and a center of curvature 18 which forms the center of movement of the hinge formed by the prosthesis. This means that the cover plates 11, 12 and the vertebrae 1, 2 connected to them are able to execute a relative movement with respect to one another which represents a rotation movement about the center 18 as long as the slide surface pair 16 alone determines the relative movement. In practice, other slide surfaces, namely the articular facets, are also involved in determining the relative movement, so that the relative movement actually taking place may deviate a little from this. It will however be appreciated that the hinge movement is all the more harmonious, and continuation of the patient's symptoms all the more unlikely, the more the center 18 of the hinge movement defined by the prosthesis agrees with the natural center of movement. The hinge radius is defined independently of the slide surface radius and differs from the latter in that it is measured from the center 18 of the hinge movement to the geometric midpoint of the prosthesis.


The prostheses intended for the more cranial intervertebral spaces (in particular C2/C3 and C3/C4) are distinguished on the one hand by a larger hinge radius than in the prostheses which are intended for the more caudal intervertebral spaces (in particular C5/C6 and C6/C7). On the other hand, the prostheses to be fitted more in the cranial direction can have a smaller surface extent in particular in the AP direction (AP=anteroposterior) than the prostheses to be fitted more in the caudal direction can. Thus, a further characteristic feature of the invention lies in the fact that the set of intervertebral prostheses comprises at least one first prosthesis whose hinge radius is greater and whose surface extent (in particular in the AP direction) is smaller than those of a second prosthesis.

Claims
  • 1. An intervertebral prosthesis system comprising: a first prosthesis for replacement of a first intervertebral disk having a first hinge with a pair of slide surfaces having a first radius of curvature, the first intervertebral disk lying in a cranial direction relative to a second intervertebral disk; anda second prosthesis for replacement of the second intervertebral disk having a second hinge with a pair of slide surfaces having a second radius of curvature, the second intervertebral disk lying in a caudal direction relative to the first intervertebral disk,wherein the first radius of curvature is greater than the second radius of curvature and the first prosthesis has a smaller extent in an anterior-posterior direction than an extent in an anterior-posterior direction of the second prosthesis.
  • 2. The intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 1, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis is 18 mm or more and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis is 18 mm or less.
  • 3. The intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 1, wherein the slide surface radius of at least one of the first prosthesis and second prosthesis is below 20 mm.
  • 4. The intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 1, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis ranges between 22 mm and 18 mm and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis ranges between 18 mm and 12 mm.
  • 5. The intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 1, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis is 20 mm or more and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis is 20 mm or less.
  • 6. A cervical intervertebral prosthesis system comprising: a first prosthesis for replacement of a first intervertebral disk having a first hinge with a pair of slide surfaces having a first radius of curvature, the first intervertebral disk lying in a cranial direction relative to a second intervertebral disk; anda second prosthesis for replacement of the second intervertebral disk having a second hinge with a pair of slide surfaces having a second radius of curvature, the second intervertebral disk lying in a caudal direction relative to the first intervertebral disk,wherein the first radius of curvature is greater than the second radius of curvature and the first prosthesis has a smaller extent in an anterior-posterior direction than an extent in an anterior-posterior direction of the second prosthesis.
  • 7. The cervical intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 6, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis is 18 mm or more and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis is 18 mm or less.
  • 8. The cervical intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 6, wherein the slide surface radius of at least one of the first prosthesis and the second prosthesis is below 20 mm.
  • 9. The cervical intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 6, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis ranges between 22 mm and 18 mm and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis ranges between 18 mm and 12 mm.
  • 10. The cervical intervertebral prosthesis system according to claim 6, wherein the slide surface radius of the first prosthesis is 20 mm or more and the slide surface radius of the second prosthesis is 20 mm or less.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/687,933, filed Oct. 20, 2003, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (40)
Number Name Date Kind
1174757 Packer Mar 1916 A
3154072 Mack Oct 1964 A
4384372 Rector May 1983 A
4627109 Carabelli et al. Dec 1986 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4782535 Yewer, Jr. et al. Nov 1988 A
4968027 Anderson Nov 1990 A
5036864 Yewer, Jr. Aug 1991 A
5046488 Schiek, Sr. Sep 1991 A
5086758 Schiek, Sr. et al. Feb 1992 A
5172454 Martignago et al. Dec 1992 A
5178163 Yewer, Jr. Jan 1993 A
5269050 Yewer, Jr. Dec 1993 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5316022 Schiek, Sr. May 1994 A
5388274 Glover et al. Feb 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5416952 Dodge May 1995 A
5425773 Boyd et al. Jun 1995 A
5432951 Yewer, Jr. Jul 1995 A
5445601 Harlow Aug 1995 A
5470000 Munoz Nov 1995 A
5500959 Yewer, Jr. Mar 1996 A
5507816 Bullivant et al. Apr 1996 A
5534029 Shima et al. Jul 1996 A
5551085 Leighton Sep 1996 A
5562738 Boyd et al. Oct 1996 A
5581810 Yewer, Jr. Dec 1996 A
5745959 Dodge May 1998 A
5895428 Berry Apr 1999 A
6039763 Shelokov Mar 2000 A
6053883 Schiek, Sr. Apr 2000 A
6179874 Cauthen Jan 2001 B1
6350283 Michelson Feb 2002 B1
6374464 Lai et al. Apr 2002 B1
6554297 Phillips et al. Apr 2003 B2
6610089 Liu et al. Aug 2003 B1
20020170105 Koene et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040078079 Foley Apr 2004 A1
20040153157 Keller Aug 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
0 955 021 Mar 1998 EP
1 166 725 Jan 2002 EP
2718635 Oct 1995 FR
10-234755 Sep 1998 JP
WO-9911203 Aug 1998 WO
WO-02080818 Oct 2002 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080269905 A1 Oct 2008 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10687933 Oct 2003 US
Child 12169480 US