Conventional mountings for stones typically require the use of prongs, and other specially fabricated metal structures. Such structures are difficult and expensive to fabricate, and fragile. There is thus the need for a simple mounting that integrates naturally with a chain.
In one aspect, the present invention comprises a mounting for a stone. In one preferred embodiment, the mounting comprises a wire loop substantially in the form of a toroidal helix; the loop having a plurality of notches therein; the notches being configured to receive the edges of a stone. In one embodiment, the wire loop is rigid. In another embodiment, the wire loop is resilient.
In another aspect, the present invention comprises a chain. In one preferred embodiment, the chain comprises a first wire loop substantially in the form of a toroidal helix, the helix having eight coils, and a first link comprising a second wire loop through a first coil of the toroidal helix and a third link comprising a second wire loop through a second coil of the toroidal helix, the first and second coils of the toroidal helix being separated by two coils of the toroidal helix. Alternatively, other numbers of coils, preferably between four and 36, may be used.
In one aspect, the present invention comprises a mounting for a stone. In another aspect, the invention comprises a chain. In a third aspect, the invention comprises a mounting for a stone and a chain. An example preferred embodiment of these three aspects is illustrated in
The mounting 101 preferably comprises a wire loop disposed substantially in the form of a toroidal helix. The example preferred embodiment 101 comprises a substantially toroidal helix comprising eight coils of the wire loop. Notches are cut in the wire loop, the notches being configured to receive the edges of a stone 110. In a preferred embodiment, the wire is resilient. In another embodiment, the wire is rigid. Preferably, the wire is gold or another precious metal, such as platinum. Preferably the stone 110 is a jewel, such as diamond or other gem stone.
Again referring to
One preferred embodiment comprises a graduated chain, in which the size of the toroidally helical form varies along the length of the chain. Another preferred embodiment comprises a first chain having graduated chains hanging from the first chain at regular intervals.
In a preferred embodiment, the wire loops are mountings, and comprise eight coils. In this preferred embodiment, links 120 and 130 are through coils 140 and 150 respectively of wire loop 101, and coils 140 and 150 are separated by two other coils of the wire loop. The preferred number of coils and spacing between links yields a useful naturally curved chain for wearing as a necklace that has a tendency to lay with the mounted stones facing outward.
The example preferred embodiment illustrated in
Notches are cut in the wire to receive a stone using a cutting tool having a profile matching the profile of the edge of the stone. In this preferred embodiment, the stone is a brilliant-cut diamond. A burr for brilliant-cut diamond is available from Bijoutil, Stockbrunnenrain 6, 4123 Allschwil, Swtizerland. The preferred tool is “Brilliantform,” form 414, and is available in different sizes having catalog number 43101 to 43119.
The wire helix is cut into pieces, each piece having eight coils. The eight-coil helix is then bent in a circular manner into a substantially toroidally helical form as shown in
A stone is inserted into the notched and formed wire, which is temporarily displaced, and then re-forms to seat the stone in the notches. For smaller diameter wire, such as 0.65 mm or smaller, the coils are preferably soldered together around the stone to avoid unseating the stone when the chain is under tension. The size of the stone is selected based on the size of the wire. For a 0.45 mm wire, a 1.2 mm stone is preferably used; for a 0.55 mm wire, a 1.5 mm stone is preferably used; for a 0.65 mm wire, a 1.7 mm stone is preferably used; for a 0.8 mm wire, a 2.0 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.0 mm wire, a 2.5 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.1 mm wire, a 2.9 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.2 mm wire, a 3.1 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.35 mm wire, a 3.6 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.5 mm wire, a 4.1 mm stone is preferably used; for a 1.65 mm wire, a 4.5 mm stone is preferably used. Other sizes are possible.
The invention is described in terms of the preferred embodiments, but is not limited thereto.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60382973 | May 2002 | US |