This invention relates to slats which are inserted into chain link fences in order to increase privacy and security, and especially to the retention of such slats in a chain link fence.
There are many patents for retaining, or locking, slats into a chain link fence.
These generally appear to fall into four major categories: (1) apertures in the sides of adjacent slats through which a retaining bar is placed; (2) a substantially U-shaped channel to receive an end of each slat placed at the bottom, the top, or both the bottom and the top of the slats; (3) a pin placed within and extending from each slat; and (4) fins extending from the sides of the slats to the knuckles of the fence, plus a fifth category of miscellaneous retaining devices.
In the first major category U.S. Pat. No. 4,512,556 has such a retaining bar, indeed, inserted through apertures in the slats. For U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761 each slat is retained by one or more horizontal slats or strips intertwined in the fence wires and passed through aligned openings in the opposite sides of the slats; a strip can be unwound from a supply spool. (Although this could be inserted into a chain link fence, i.e., pre-inserted, prior to installation, or even shipment, of the fence and probably wound with the uninstalled fence for shipment, but such pre-insertion would be difficult because the apertures would have to be precisely aligned for all the slats. Moreover, such pre-insertion is nowhere stated in the patent to have been done. A similar slat-retaining fence using a strip placed through apertures in the slats is manufactured and offered for sale as the Top Lock Slat by Pexco of Atlanta, Ga.) In U.S. Pat. No. 5,106,058 a flexible belt (made from flexible material such as plastic, rubber, or the like) is horizontally inserted through apertures in the slats. For U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,468 slots (apertures) in slats receive a retaining bar. Slats having opposing slots (apertures) for receiving a retaining bar are the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 5,806,839. A support bar extends through opening in the slats of U.S. Pat. No. 6,182,947. And one embodiment for U.S. Pat. No. 6,966,547 involves an upper rail extending through apertures in slats.
Representative of the second major category, United States Patent Publication No. 2014/0145133 utilizes a U-shaped retainer having flanges to spring into cutouts in the slat. (The retainer is stated to be able to be at either the top or the bottom of the slats, but it is not indicated that a top retainer and a bottom retainer can be simultaneously employed. A second embodiment of U.S. Pat. No. 6,966,547 has sidewall on each slat which snaps into a retainer on the top, bottom, or both ends of the fence. Each slat in U.S. Pat. No. 7,878,487 has at least two notches on opposite faces into which barbs extend from the front and rear of the retaining channel; the retaining channel can be at the top or the bottom of the fence but is not stated to be simultaneously at the top and the bottom. Tabs on a U-shaped retaining bar at the bottom of the fence fit into apertures in the front and rear of the slats for U.S. Pat. No. 8,366,078. In a first variant of this major category U.S. Pat. No. 7,165,760 uses a retraining strip having protrusions, at least one of which fits into a notch near the bottom of each slat. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,085,954 a U-shaped retainer can support the slats from the bottom or be at the top or bottom or both of the slats but has no portion extending into any slat. And two examples of a second related variant exist. U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,760,759 and 2,802,645 are very similar to each other. Both involve slats that are supported by a horizontal slat or strip (or, in a different embodiment, attached to a rigid connecting member). Proper alignment of the slats within each retainer would, however, be very time consuming.
Within the third major category U.S. Pat. No. 4,725,044 has a pin which locks into a slat through an aperture and limits the movement of the slat with respect the wire of a fence or, in a second embodiment, can wrap around a bottom rail installed on the fence. A member having a stop to retain a slat is inserted into a slat of U.S. Pat. No. 5,794,922. And the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,929 seem to deal with third and fourth stops which are discussed but not claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,794,922. Installation of these pins would again require considerable time.
For the fourth major category U.S. Pat. No. 5,775,676 has fins which wedge into the knuckles of a fence; one embodiment also has strands, at the ends of the fins, to wrap around the knuckle. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,164,628 a first set and a second set of fins retain a slat in a chain link fence by engaging the knuckles of the fence. And a notch in a fin of a slat is intended to catch on a fence knuckle in U.S. Pat. No. 6,634,623.
For the miscellaneous category the one embodiment of U.S. Pat. No. 2,802,645 was noted above. Additionally, the slats of U.S. Pat. No. 3,069,142 are diagonally arranged, are attached to the wire of the fence with an integral clip, and are further retained with frictional force from slats that are perpendicularly diagonal to the other slats. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,836,505 a horizontal strip member is conventionally attached to the vertical slats; the strip member is made from any conventional materials, such as wood, metal, or extruded plastic. Picket members on one side of a chain link fence are, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,275,381 snappingly engaged with mounting members either woven into the fence or on the opposite side of the fence. An expandable corrugated slat of U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,243 uses spring force to retain such slat in the channel of a fence. In U.S. Pat. No. 7,237,766 projections from a cap fit into channels of adjacent slats. And in U.S. Pat. No. Re. 36,0385 each slat has a channel near one edge to retain the fence wire between adjacent knuckles and also has an attachable cover for such channel.
Notwithstanding this prior art, there is a significant absence in the industry of chain link fences with slat retention systems that optimize installation efficiency, through, for example, pre-installed retention-type configurations that allow the entire system to be rolled or unrolled. As explicitly mentioned above with respect to U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761 none of the above patents indicates that pre-insertion occurs, and the inventor is aware of no chain link fence which is manufactured and marketed with the slats and retaining device pre-installed (outside if its own). In fact, U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761 suggests the opposite by indicating, in lines 11 through 14 of column 3, “After installation, each slat 74 is held in place by one or more horizontally oriented retaining slats or strips 78 intertwined in the fence wires 42 and passed through aligned openings 80 in the opposite sides of the slats 74,” as also does U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,468 by declaring, in lines 35 through 37 of column 1, “It is also desirable to provide an aesthetically pleasing fence insert which is readily installed into an existing chain link fence.”
Also, the inventor has been involved with the manufacture of slats for chain link fences since 1992 and is unaware of any retaining device actually employed in a chain link fence which is more than approximately four feet long. Notably, even the patents employing a retaining member that is flexible (U.S. Pat. No. 5,106,058) or unwound from a supply spool (U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761) do not state or illustrate that the retaining member would be more than approximately four feet long. Still, U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761, in lines 17 through 19 of column 3, asserts, “In the size noted, strip 78 has the advantage of being supplied on a supply spool and unwound therefrom for long length installation”; and line 58 in column 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,966,547 states, “The slat retainer [which may be positioned along the bottom, the top, or both ends of a chain link fence] may have any desired length.” Also, U. S. Patent Application No. 20140145133 indicates, “The [U-shaped] slat retainer 380 may have any desired or suitable length. Likewise, any number of the slat retainers 380 may be used.” These statements in patent documents and the inventor's observation can be resolved only by understanding that one or ordinary skill in the art would, prior to the inventor's conceiving of the present invention not have desired a length longer than approximately four feet for such a retainer and would have considered four feet to be a “long length.” This is understandable in view of the facts that pre-insertion of a slat retainer had not occurred prior to the present invention and that dealing with lengthy retainers in the field would be very difficult. Moreover, immediately after the quotation from U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,761 regarding a “long length installation,” that patent provides, “Alternatively, lengths of flattened tubes 76 may, as shown in
In fact, difficulty with insertion constitutes one of the reasons which the inventor's experience causes him to believe has dissuaded anyone from previously developing the concept for, or the reality of, a chain link fence with pre-inserted slats.
Indeed, even when a retaining device for the slats is employed, a multitude of such reasons exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following: For the first category of retaining devices, i.e., apertures in the sides of adjacent slats through which a retaining bar is placed, it would be very difficult and time consuming to align the apertures in the various slats perfectly to permit the passage of the retaining bar though all the slats. Subsequent to insertion of the retaining bar the ends of such retaining bar could inadvertently withdraw from the apertures in one or more slats, thereby permitting such slats to drop lower than the remaining slats and causing the overall pre-inserted collection of slats to become non-uniform in appearance, creating an undesirable aesthetic effect. Slats have almost universally been a distinctly separate business from chain link fences; so, dealers and customers have become satisfied with buying these items separately and inserting the slats after the chain link fence has been installed. Many customers prefer to select the slat they desire and the fence they desire separately. And the added cost for pre-insertion has deterred innovation in this regard.
In lines 22 through 24 of column 2 U.S. Pat. No. 4,512,556 of Don A. Meglino asserts, “The leading end 5′ of the retaining slat 5 is preferably tapered for easy insertion through the aperture 10 in the parallel slats.” Such a retaining slat 5 is shown in the figures to have the very most extreme portion of the leading end 5′ and to have the sides (sometimes termed “edges”) of the retaining slat angled toward each other when seen in a plan view showing either face of the retaining slat 5. In Mr. Meglino's U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,806,839 and 6,182,947 such a “tapered” leading end is illustrated but not discussed.
But the inventor is unaware of any retention band in the prior art the first end (sometimes termed the “leading end”) of which is tapered when seen from either side in an elevational view.
Furthermore, no prior art slat is known to the inventor to have the entrance to an internal passage beveled inward to guide the first end of a retention band into such entrance during insertion of such retention band.
Nor does the inventor know of any prior art having such an entrance that, when seen in a plan view showing either face of the retention band, is concave to facilitate insertion of a retention band into such entrance during insertion of such retention band.
The chain link fence with retained slats of the present invention includes a chain link fence with two or more slats inserted into the fence, each slat having two or more opposing apertures bounding an internal channel, and at least one band disposed through the internal channels so as to retain the slats within the chain link fence. Moreover, the band is flexible and the entire system is configured to be rolled and unrolled. In one embodiment, the apertures, interior channel and/or channels incorporate one or more concavities curved inward with respect to a side or sides of the slat resulting in circular or elliptical apertures. Embodiments may also use: beveled apertures; interior channel, and/or channels; bands with tapered ends; and various other features for optimizing installation. Finally, the invention includes a method of making the chain link fence with retained slats.
To further clarify the above and other aspects of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The drawings may not be drawn to scale. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring briefly back to
As set forth herein, the invention may also include a method of making a fence with retained slats according to the fence, slat, and/or band specifications set forth herein. Such method may include the steps of: providing a chain link fence; providing fence slats, each slat having two opposing apertures bounding an internal channel; inserting the fence slats into the chain link fence; providing an elongate band; and inserting the elongate band through the fence slat apertures. As the fence with retained slats is intended in some embodiments as a pre-installed system, the method may further include the step of installing the fence at a property including after the other abovementioned steps.
A number of features may be incorporated in order to facilitate placement of a band or bands into a slat or slats. Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As set forth herein, the invention may also include a method of making a fence with retained slats according to the fence, slat, and/or band specifications set forth herein. Such method may include the steps of: providing a chain link fence; providing fence slats, each slat having two opposing apertures bounding an internal channel; inserting the fence slats into the chain link fence; providing an elongate band; and inserting the elongate band through the fence slat apertures. As the fence with retained slats is intended in some embodiments as a pre-installed system, the method may further include the step of installing the fence at a property including after the other abovementioned steps.
Thus configured, a chain link fence with retained slats is provided that optimizes installation efficiency through a pre-installed, retention-type configuration that allows the entire system to be rolled or unrolled.
As used herein, the term “substantially” indicates that one skilled in the art would consider the value modified by such terms to be within acceptable limits for the stated value. Also as used herein the term “preferable” or “preferably” means that a specified element or technique is more acceptable than another but not that such specified element or technique is a necessity. The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2760759 | Rice | Aug 1957 | A |
2802645 | Rice | Aug 1957 | A |
3069142 | Kessler | Dec 1962 | A |
3877140 | Topolsek | Apr 1975 | A |
4085954 | Thompson | Apr 1978 | A |
4183993 | Benstead | Jan 1980 | A |
4512556 | Meglino | Apr 1985 | A |
4725044 | Cluff | Feb 1988 | A |
4836505 | Meglino | Jun 1989 | A |
5056761 | Meglino | Oct 1991 | A |
5106058 | Finkelstein | Apr 1992 | A |
5275381 | Cluff | Jan 1994 | A |
5584468 | Meglino | Dec 1996 | A |
5775676 | Hoggan | Jul 1998 | A |
5794922 | Meglino | Aug 1998 | A |
5799929 | Meglino | Sep 1998 | A |
5806839 | Meglino | Sep 1998 | A |
6068243 | Hoggan | May 2000 | A |
6164628 | Hoggan | Dec 2000 | A |
6182947 | Meglino | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6634623 | Torres | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6966547 | Colliander | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7165760 | Campbell | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7237766 | Lemay | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7878487 | Pearson | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8366078 | Meglino | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20140145133 | McClure | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2013 102 540 | Jun 2013 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170328084 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |