The invention relates generally to chairs and more particularly to chairs featuring ergonomic design to reduce ache and fatigue occasioned by prolonged sitting, and to promote good posture.
The prior art reflects many attempts to address the problem of workplace fatigue and chronic aches arising from prolonged sitting, such as prolonged periods sitting at a computer monitor. A common approach is to employ a variety of adjustable settings to adjust the positioning and contours of the chair. A chair with only a few adjustable features, such seat height, platform tilt, or recline spring torsion may be adequate for some but lead to early fatigue in others. This has led to various approaches to adjust the configuration or responsiveness of the seatback. One of many examples is U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,547 (Vik) which features a vertically moveable seatback and adjustable lumbar support. Another is U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,494 (Yoo) also featuring a vertically adjustable seatback. Another is U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,158 (Adat) also featuring adjustable lumbar support. Another is U.S. Pat. No. 5,112,106 (Asbjornsen) featuring vertical adjustability and limited adjustability normal to the user's back, along a central spine or rail.
Similarly it is known to provide a chair backrest having an open shoulder area that does not significantly engage the user's shoulder blades (scapulae). Of course any chairback that terminates before reaching the user's scapulae will have open shoulders. However, many persons believe a higher chairback promotes better posture by deterring slouching. Some chairs do employ a higher chairback design and provide support to the thoracic region of the user's spine without significantly engaging the user's shoulder blades. An old example is the “Tuam” three-legged stool in which a third leg extends upwards to function as a narrow back rest. Several more modern office chairs feature an open shoulder chairback; a subset of these chairs include a headrest/neckrest feature. Some open shoulder designs include chairs marketed under the “Soma” brand, Office Master “Discovery Back” series, RFM Seating Corporation's “Carmel” series, Håg Capisco (model 81276), and seating support devices that may be utilized as a portable apparatus, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,668 (Crisp) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,969,114 (Keilhauer).
Many earlier attempts to increase comfort during prolonged seating have sought to distribute back support more evenly. This may take the form of a chairback sculpted to conform to the S-shaped curvature of the human backbone, such as U.S. Pat. No. 6,969,114 (Keilhauer) which attempts to match a theoretically optimal seated spine curvature. Such sculpted chairbacks virtually always feature a midrest region having a concave chairback region that engages with the thoracic region of the user's spine, with the aim of complementing the natural dorsal curvature of the human spine in the thoracic region. However, varying sizes and shapes of users and their spines resists chair standardization.
A common feature of even the modern open-shoulder high-backed chairs is that the midrest portion of the chairback—the part that supports the thoracic region of the user—is wide relative to the width of the user's spine, especially in the lower thoracic region immediately above the lumbar region. Such designs continue to impose varying degrees of pressure/support on non-skeletal regions of the dorsal trunk in the lower thoracic zone lateral to the spine. Although such chairs may be adequate for some users, many users with back problems continue to experience discomfort. The “beam back” chair disclosed in KR20140008930A (Jung In Kim) suggests narrowly concentrating back support along the user's spine thereby avoiding the user's scapulae and other lateral dorsal regions. Like other attempts at improved chairback design, however, Kim's invention features a curved surface normal to the user's back to complement the user's spinal curvature, in order to distribute support across substantially all of the user's spine from lower lumbar to the cervical (neck) region (see Kim, FIGS. 1 and 6). Further, Kim requires complicated adjustment mechanisms to adapt to various spinal curvatures.
Adding a multitude of adjustable features gives rise to collateral problems. A multitude of mechanisms increases manufacturing expense, complicates user-operation, and increases the likelihood of a mechanism failing. Such multi-adjustable chairbacks, even if effective, are usually expensive. Further, achieving optimal adjustment of all the settings is tricky, and often the chair is only marginally effective at achieving the goal of increased comfort after prolonged sitting. Consequently many people who might benefit from a good ergonomic chair cannot afford it. There is a need for an affordable open-shoulder chair that concentrates thoracic support on the user's spine without sacrificing comfort, while being visually pleasing.
The inventor has made the counterintuitive discovery that superior and prolonged seating comfort is achieved not by laterally and vertically distributing pressure across multiple regions of the user's back, nor is it achieved by attempting to match the curvature of the user's thoracic spinal region. Rather, the inventor discloses a chairback in which the user's back is supported mainly by a narrow and generally flat or moderately convex thoracic cushion in the midrest portion of the chairback that engages with the thoracic region of the user's spine without providing significant support to areas lateral to the user's spine. In one embodiment, the chairback comprises a narrow, flat, and relatively shallow cushion centered in the midrest providing support normal to the user's thoracic spinal region. In another embodiment, a narrow thoracic cushion is coupled with a proportionately larger lumbar support cushion below and transverse to the thoracic cushion. In another embodiment, the chairback may comprise a neckrest to support the user's cervical spinal region. In another embodiment, a fabric extending across the midrest may provide functionality and heighten aesthetic appeal without significantly detracting from the thoracic support primarily provided by the narrow thoracic cushion; the fabric could be a mesh and be installed in front of or behind one or both cushions. In another embodiment, the chairback may be comprised of a material such as molded urethane or polyurethane foam having regions of varying anterior elevation, comprising an elevated ridge along the thoracic region of the spine. In another embodiment, the aforesaid regions might have comparable anterior elevations but have different indentation load deflection values, comprising a very firm cushion region (high ILD) along the thoracic spinal region of the midrest, and comprising softer cushion region (lower ILD) normal to the user's scapulae, thereby concentrating thoracic support on the spine. In another embodiment, a central chairback element attached to a seat platform has a mechanism to limit deflection when the user reclines, providing firm support to the thoracic spinal region while abutting side elements have mechanisms permitting easier deflection, thereby concentrating thoracic support on the user's spine as in the other embodiments.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
Support column 18 supports a seat platform 20 rotatably attached to support column 18. Seat platform 20 comprises a topside portion 22. In a preferred embodiment, topside portion 22 comprises a seat cushion 24, though a cushion is not required. If a seat cushion 24 is utilized, it sits on cushion support 26 (shown in
Attached to seat platform 20 is a back support frame 40 comprising a lower back support frame 44 at the end that is proximal to seat platform 20, and an upper back support frame 46 terminating at the distal end of back support frame 40. The lower back support frame 44 may attach to seat platform 20 at any number of attachment points 42. Back support frame may be of any configuration. In a first embodiment best shown in
Chair 10 may also comprise armrests 30. Armrests 30 may attach to the underside or topside 22 portions of seat platform 20, or to lower back support frame 44. The armrests may be adjustable in the vertical, lateral (side to side) and longitudinal directions. Armrests 30 may also pivot around one or more lateral or longitudinal axes, or retract into a portion of the chair, e.g. the underside of seat platform 20.
Chair 10 may also comprise a lower backrest 50 and a lumbar cushion 52, attached to the back support frame 40. Lower backrest 50 is placed near the proximal end of back support frame 40 to engage with a seated user's lumbar region. Lower backrest 50 is preferably vertically adjustable, and may also be adjustable longitudinally, i.e. normal (perpendicular) to the user's back. The adjustment means may be manual or electric, and comprise complementary rails 43 as shown in
A second embodiment of chair 10 is shown in
Chair 10 may also comprise a neckrest 60 and optionally a neckrest cushion 62 having a front and attached to the distal end of back support frame 40. Like lower backrest 50, neckrest 60 is preferably vertically adjustable, and may also be adjustable longitudinally, i.e. normal (perpendicular) to the user's neck. In a preferred embodiment, neckrest 60 may be structurally secured to upper back support frame 46 by means of a single rod or a plurality of frictionally secured rods as shown in
Returning to
In a preferred embodiment the length of thoracic cushion 48 is significantly longer than its width. In a more preferred embodiment, the width of thoracic cushion 48 is less than five inches along its length. In another preferred embodiment, the width of the upper two-thirds of thoracic cushion 48 is less than four inches and the width of the lower third no more than than six inches. Thoracic cushion 48 preferably has a thickness (in the longitudinal dimension) less than two inches or even less than one inch. Thoracic cushion 48 is characterized by a cushion firmness, which may be measured by Indentation Load Deflection (ILD). As is known to those skilled in the art, a plush cushion has a range of about 16.5 ILD to 22.5 ILD, a soft cushion has a range of about 22.5 ILD to 26.5 ILD, a medium cushion has a range of about 26.5 ILD to 30.5 ILD, a firm cushion has a range of about 30.5 ILD to 34.5 ILD, a very firm cushion has a range of about 34.5 to 38.5 ILD, and an extremely firm cushion may have an ILD as high as 50 ILD. In one embodiment, thoracic cushion 48 is at least medium firmness corresponding to an effective ILD above about 26.5. Lumbar cushion 52 and neckrest cushion 62 preferably also have at least medium firmness. For purposes of the specification and the claims “effective ILD” means the human-perceived firmness of a chair element, such as a chair cushion or chair fabric region, that relates most closely with the firmness of a molded urethane foam sample as measured by industry standard ASTM D3574-17.
The front face of thoracic cushion 48 may be generally rectangular as shown in
In another embodiment, thoracic cushion 48 may comprise a ventral depression through its middle, running vertically along some or all of the length of thoracic cushion 48, to center and cradle the thoracic region 36 of the user's spine, that embodiment illustrated in
When designed and built appropriately, adding chairback fabric 70 to chair 10 does not significantly reduce the aforementioned functionality of concentrating upper back support to the user's thoracic region 36. Chair fabric 70 may cover thoracic cushion 48 and lumbar cushion 52 as well as interstitial areas 72. As shown in
Chairback fabric 70 may unitarily cover the lateral expanse of midrest 47, or cover the entire chairback including neckrest 62, or only partially cover the chairback. Chairback fabric 70 and chairback frame 74 may extend below lumbar cushion 52 as shown in
The same functional effect can be achieved by structuring a chairback with a single back cushion body having a plurality of regions, with firmer and/or more elevated support in some regions and softer and/or lower elevation of support in others. It is known to fabricate a cushion or mattress characterized by a plurality of regions having different levels of firmness or height elevation. As shown in
Demarcating the boundaries between thoracic cushion region 78, scapular cushion region 80, and lumbar cushion region 82 may be accomplished by fabricating chairback 77 with these regions having differing firmness levels. Preferably the firmness of thoracic cushion region 78 is substantially higher than the firmness of scapular cushion regions 80. For example, thoracic cushion region 78 may be firm and have an effective ILD above about 28, and scapular cushion region 80 may be soft and have an effective ILD below about 24. In another embodiment, demarcation may be accomplished by fabricating chairback 77 with the regions having varying cushion height/elevation. In the embodiment shown in
In other embodiments, chairback 77 may comprise a cushion whereby the regions are demarcated by a combination of varying cushion firmness and varying elevation. The functional outcome of thoracic cushion region 78 being firmer and/or higher than nearby scapular cushion region 80 is that chairback 77 primarily supports the seated user's thoracic spinal region 36 and only minimally engages with the seated user's scapulae. The thoracic cushion region's anterior elevation may be higher and/or firmer than the proximately adjacent scapular cushion region thereby creating a ridge, such that the upper portions of chairback 77 primarily support the seated user's thoracic spinal region and only minimally engages with the seated user's scapulae. Similarly, lumbar cushion region 82 may comprise a cushion having a higher anterior elevation and/or degree of firmness than both thoracic cushion region 78 and scapular cushion region 80. Lumbar cushion region 82 may comprise a cushion being more firm than nearby areas. As in all other embodiments described above, the thoracic cushion region 78 and lumbar cushion region 82 may be vertically or longitudinally adjustable using means described above and known to those skilled in the art.
Another embodiment of the invention is shown in
In the embodiment shown, the first means of resisting rearward deflection for central element 84 is substantially stronger/higher than the second means of resisting rearward deflection for side elements 86. As shown in
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, particular features of one embodiment can replace corresponding features in another embodiment or can supplement other embodiments unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 62/801,268 filed Feb. 5, 2019, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977702 | Summerlee et al. | Oct 1934 | A |
2364261 | Wood | Dec 1944 | A |
2667210 | Charles | Jan 1954 | A |
3288525 | Cerf | Nov 1966 | A |
D214119 | Worley | May 1969 | S |
3574396 | Bird | Apr 1971 | A |
3741596 | Cate | Jun 1973 | A |
3883176 | Morton | May 1975 | A |
3989297 | Kerstholt | Nov 1976 | A |
4032190 | Muller-Deisig et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4607882 | Opsvik | Aug 1986 | A |
4864668 | Crisp | Sep 1989 | A |
D320120 | Samuelsson | Sep 1991 | S |
5112106 | Asbjornsen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5501507 | Hummitzsch | Mar 1996 | A |
5575534 | Yu | Nov 1996 | A |
5624158 | Adat et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5685613 | Franzen, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5897472 | Thulasingam | Apr 1999 | A |
5908221 | Neil | Jun 1999 | A |
5975632 | Ginat | Nov 1999 | A |
6059362 | Lin | May 2000 | A |
6394547 | Vik | May 2002 | B1 |
6419318 | Albright | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6626494 | Yoo | Sep 2003 | B2 |
D501333 | Piretti | Feb 2005 | S |
6938956 | Piretti | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6969114 | Keilhauer | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D512231 | Landin Lorentzen | Dec 2005 | S |
7059678 | Taylor | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7195583 | Leib | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7249802 | Schmitz | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D547959 | Adams | Aug 2007 | S |
7396082 | Sanchez | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419222 | Schmitz | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7425037 | Schmitz | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7585028 | Jenkins | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7625046 | Sanchez | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7703849 | Bilak | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731295 | Lin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7841666 | Schmitz | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7909402 | Chu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D646511 | Ballendat | Oct 2011 | S |
8029060 | Parker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8061778 | Machael et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D661916 | Chen | Jun 2012 | S |
8449037 | Behar | May 2013 | B2 |
8573697 | Su | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8696534 | Karwan | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8864230 | Augustat | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8926016 | Behar | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9049936 | Leone et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9131775 | Eisenberg | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9138061 | Eisenberg | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9226582 | Jenkins | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9301615 | Behar | Apr 2016 | B2 |
D763588 | Chen et al. | Aug 2016 | S |
9480340 | Harlow | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9585478 | Eisenberg | Mar 2017 | B1 |
D784748 | Tsai | Apr 2017 | S |
D804879 | Harlow | Dec 2017 | S |
10021983 | Mark | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10226129 | Christianson et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10272282 | Harlow | Apr 2019 | B2 |
D870478 | Mason | Dec 2019 | S |
10667612 | Matlin | Jun 2020 | B2 |
D897707 | Mason | Oct 2020 | S |
10827841 | Tsai | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10973725 | Mason | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20050062323 | Dicks | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050104428 | Walker | May 2005 | A1 |
20050189810 | Wu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050275263 | Norman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275264 | Norman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060238006 | Baranov | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20100164266 | Walters | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120193959 | Chen | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130005550 | Nagy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20160374474 | Wu | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180116405 | Gerbino | May 2018 | A1 |
20190125609 | Mason | May 2019 | A1 |
20190223603 | France | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2798532 | Dec 2011 | CA |
2953773 | Jun 2018 | CA |
108887967 | Nov 2018 | CN |
3824730 | Jan 1990 | DE |
19848400 | May 2000 | DE |
0970639 | Jan 2000 | EP |
2842403 | Jan 2004 | FR |
2561703 | Oct 2018 | GB |
H0795912 | Apr 1995 | JP |
2005080677 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2019084337 | Jun 2019 | JP |
100322248 | Oct 2002 | KR |
1989009557 | Oct 1989 | WO |
WO-2006010552 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2008054225 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2014196630 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2017014661 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO-2019204714 | Oct 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
HAG Capisco Ergonomic Seat, 2020, https://store.flokk.com/us/en-gb/products/hag-capisco?model=8127-STD&store=auto. |
Neutral Posture 8000 Series Brochure, 2018, http://www.neutralposture.com/_imgs/lit/spec-sheets/8000-Series_SS_20180207.pdf. |
Office Master “Discovery Back” Series Brochure, Jun. 2013, www.officemaster.com. |
RFM Carmel Chair (with “Thoracic Ridge”) Brochure, http://rfmseating.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-Carmel.pdf. |
SOMA Backrest Chair, 2001, https://shop.healthydesign.com/assets/products/soma-ergo/soma-docs/SomaBackrests.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200245769 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62801268 | Feb 2019 | US |