Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6732484
-
Patent Number
6,732,484
-
Date Filed
Thursday, December 5, 200222 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, May 11, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 052 677
- 052 686
- 052 687
- 052 682
- 052 684
- 052 685
- 404 135
- 404 136
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A chair supports rebar or wire mesh during a concrete pour. The chair is box shaped having grooves in the side walls of different width for supporting rebar of different diameter. Notches in the edge of the grooves on opposite sides of the chair support wire mesh of different diameter. The notches are shaped so the wire mesh is snapped into the notch. Wall like braces extend across the inside of the chair and support the grooves from the opposite wall. The larger grooves are on the short sides of the chair to raise the rebar a longer distance off the underlying surface. In a preferred embodiment, the chair provides two elevations for placement of rebar, namely 2″ and 3″ above an underlying surface. Parts of the box are cut away to promote concrete movement through the chair. Slots are provided to allow air trapped in the concrete to escape from the chair.
Description
This invention relates to a chair that is used to support rebar and wire mesh during a concrete pour, and more particularly to a chair that is capable of supporting rebar and wire mesh in a wide range of sizes and at two different elevations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the pouring of concrete, metal reinforcements such as rebar or wire mesh are used to increase the strength of concrete. By itself, concrete is very strong in compression but surprisingly weak in tension. The inclusion of metal reinforcements in concrete increases the tensile strength substantially, allowing concrete to be used in many applications.
To increase strength, the metal reinforcements should be in the middle of the concrete, rather than toward one side. In a normal situation where a horizontal slab is being poured, this means the metal reinforcements should be above ground level and at about the center of the finished slab. It is accordingly necessary to provide a support, known as a chair, for the metal reinforcement to keep it off the underlying surface. Early on, the support was a rock or piece of brick. Chairs have evolved over time and become much more sophisticated.
There are a variety of chairs which have the capability of supporting different sized rebar. It is this type chair that this invention most nearly relates. Disclosures of interest relative to this invention are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,292,335; 3,449,882; 3,694,988; 4,063,397 and 5,107,654.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The chair of this invention is a generally rectangular or box shaped structure having two walls that are generally parallel and two intersecting walls that are generally parallel. A groove is provided in at least most of the walls and preferably in all of the walls. The grooves are of different width to receive and support rebar of different diameter. The grooves are preferably in the center of each wall so the load on the chair is evenly distributed to the opposite wall. A pair of intersecting wall-like braces extend across the walls of the chair on the inside of the perimeter to reinforce the grooves and thereby strengthen the chair. The grooves run in the short direction of the chair so the braces do not block movement of concrete through the interior of the chair.
The corners of the chair are preferably angled to allow concrete to move readily into and out of the inside of the chair to promote even distribution of concrete and minimize the creation or retention of air pockets. A series of slots are provided in the walls to allow trapped air to more readily migrate upwardly out of the concrete.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved chair to support metal reinforcements during a concrete pour.
Another object of this invention is to provide a chair having the capability of supporting a wide range of rebar and/or wire mesh during a concrete pour.
Another object of this invention is to provide a chair having the capability of supporting metal reinforcements at different elevations above an underlying surface.
A further object of this invention is to provide a chair that is sturdy and provides a wide base of support for metal reinforcements used in a concrete pour.
These and other objects of this invention will become more fully apparent as this description proceeds, reference being made to the accompanying drawings and appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is an isometric view of a chair of this invention;
FIG. 2
is a side elevational view of the chair of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 3
is a top view of the chair of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 4
is a cross-sectional view of the chair of
FIG. 3
, taken substantially along line
4
—
4
thereof as viewed in the direction indicated by the arrows;
FIG. 5
is an end view of the chair of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 6
is a cross-sectional view of the chair of
FIG. 3
, taken along line
6
—
6
thereof as viewed in the direction indicated by the arrows; and
FIG. 7
is an enlarged partial view of an improved embodiment incorporating an improved wire receiving notch.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring to
FIGS. 1-6
, a chair
10
of this invention is designed to support and retain metal reinforcements during a concrete pour. The chair
10
is a box shaped structure and is preferably longer on one side than on the other to position the metal reinforcements at different heights above an underlying surface depending on the orientation of the chair
10
. The chair
10
includes a series of grooves to support rebar, the grooves being of different width to accommodate rebar of different diameter. The short sides of the rectangular chair
10
provide the wider grooves so, when larger rebar is being used, it is supported a greater distance off an underlying surface. The chair
10
is conveniently made of injection molded plastic and includes a series of internal braces to strengthen the box shaped structure.
To these ends, the chair
10
includes a pair of long parallel side walls
12
,
14
and a pair of short parallel end walls
16
,
18
perpendicular to the side walls
12
,
14
. The long walls
12
,
14
are preferably perpendicular to the short walls
16
,
18
so the chair
10
sits symmetrically when placed on either a short wall or a long wall, i.e. the chair
10
does not tilt when placed in an operative position.
Each of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
provides a groove
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
. As shown best in
FIG. 3
, the grooves
20
,
22
are of different size and the grooves
24
,
26
are of different size. The two smaller grooves
20
,
22
are on the long sides
12
,
14
and the two larger grooves
24
,
26
on the short sides
16
,
18
. Although the grooves
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
may be of any desired size, they are preferably of a size to receive and retain current conventional rebar. It will be seen that each of the grooves is bounded by a pair of parallel ribs
28
,
30
providing a restricted entry into the grooves of a slightly smaller dimension than the diameter of the rebar. Accordingly, rebar of a diameter that fits within the grooves is forced past, or snapped through, the ribs
28
,
30
so the rebar is retained within the grooves. This is advantageous because raising a rebar rod does not allow the rod to move out of the groove. The grooves
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
are preferably in the center of its respective wall
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
so the load of the rebar is evenly distributed.
In the preferred embodiment, the grooves
22
,
24
are of the same size to receive the same size rebar. This is desirable because the rebar of one size is often used on concrete slabs of considerably different thickness. By placing the same size groove
22
,
24
on adjacent faces
14
,
16
, the chair
10
can be used to position the rebar in the middle of concrete slabs of substantially different thickness.
As illustrated, the chair
10
is capable of accommodating three different sizes of rebar. Although the exact sizes are subject to selection by the designer, it is preferred that the grooves
20
,
22
-
24
,
26
accommodate rebar of ⅜″, ½″ and ⅝″ diameter. It will be apparent, however, that the grooves
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
may all be of different size to accommodate four sizes of rebar. The chair
10
is conveniently about 2½″ wide and 3⅝″ long which positions the rebar either 2″ or 3″ above an underlying surface and thereby provides appropriate spacing for rebar of ⅜″-⅝″ diameter. It will be apparent that the overall size of the chair
10
is subject to wide variation and larger versions are appropriate for larger sized rebar to position larger rebar further from an underlying surface.
An important feature of the chair
10
is a bracing system
32
comprising a pair of intersecting wall-like braces
34
,
36
inside the cavity
38
provided by the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
. Each of the braces
34
,
36
terminates in the middle of one of the grooves
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
and provides a support for the wall forming the groove. The braces
34
,
36
form an X or + shaped structure perpendicular to the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
so that, when loaded, each of the walls and grooves is supported from the underlying surface abutting the opposite side of the chair
10
. As will be more fully apparent hereinafter, the chair
10
lies on one of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
when supporting rebar in a concrete pour so the braces
32
,
34
are vertical when loaded.
An important feature of the chair
10
is the ability to accommodate metal reinforcements in the form of wire mesh. To this end, a pair of aligned notches
40
are provided in the grooves
20
,
22
and a pair of aligned notches
42
of the same size are provided in the grooves
24
,
26
on one side of the chair
10
. The bottoms of the notches
40
,
42
are spaced from the opposite edge of the chair
10
the same distance so wire mesh can be supported at an intersection. The notches
40
,
42
are slightly larger than one conventional diameter wire mesh. Although the notches
40
,
42
may be of any desired width, they are conveniently about 0.160 inches wide to accommodate a wire mesh of ⅛″ diameter. When the chair
10
is being used to support wire mesh, it will be positioned with an edge on the underlying surface. This is substantially weaker than when the chair
10
is lying on one of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
but the loads imparted by wire mesh to the chair
10
are much lower. The entrance into the bottom of the notches
40
,
42
is provided by edges
44
converging toward the notches
40
,
42
thereby assisting in the placement of the wire mesh in the notches
40
,
42
.
To accommodate wire mesh of different size, a second set of notches
46
,
48
is provided on the opposite side of the chair
10
. The notches
46
,
48
open through the grooves and are larger than the notches
40
,
42
. Although the notches
46
,
48
may be of any suitable size, they are conveniently 0.207″ wide to accommodate a wire of {fraction (3/16)}″ diameter. The entrance to the bottom of the notches
46
,
48
is provided by converging edges
50
thereby assisting in the placement of wire mesh in the notches
46
,
48
.
An important feature of the chair
10
lies in minimizing resistance to concrete flow and thereby aiding in minimizing the development of air pockets in the concrete slab. To this end, the corners of the chair
10
are beveled, i.e. the edges
52
of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
converge toward the center of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
at the corners. Although the edges
52
may be at any suitable angle, an angle of 35° relative to the centerline as shown by the angle
54
in
FIG. 6
is appropriate. This allows relative free concrete flow into and through the cavity
36
than a situation where the corners of the chair
10
were of the same height as the center. Reducing the height of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
on the corners also reduces the weight of the chair
10
which is an important contribution to its low cost.
An important feature of the chair
10
lies in allowing air trapped in the cavity
36
to escape. When using the chair
10
to support rebar, one of the walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
lies on the underlying surface so its opposite wall is typically horizontal., There is a tendency for air to become trapped under the horizontal wall spaced from the underlying surface. This tendency is most pronounced when one of the long walls
12
,
14
is on the underlying surface because it is obviously larger than the short walls
16
,
18
and thus more likely to trap air. This tendency is ameliorated by the provision of slots
56
in the long walls
12
,
14
which allow any air under the elevated long wall to escape.
Use of the chair
10
should now be apparent. If rebar is to be used to reinforce concrete in a pour, the rebar is laid on the underlying surface and tied in a conventional manner. One of the rebar rods will be on top and one on bottom at their intersections. The lower rebar rod is raised from the underlying surface and one of chairs
10
placed beneath it with the groove
20
,
22
,
24
,
26
corresponding to the size of the rebar facing up. If the rebar is of a size to fit in the groove
22
,
24
, the user selects whether the long walls
12
or the short wall
18
is to be on the underlying surface to space the rebar near the center of the concrete slab. The rebar is pushed past the ribs
28
,
30
, or snapped, into the appropriate groove and the chair
10
lowered to rest on the underlying surface. The brace intersecting the groove in which the rebar is placed acts to transfer a major part of the load of the rebar to the underlying surface. Concrete is poured into the prepared area and finished in a conventional manner.
If wire mesh is to be used to reinforce concrete in a pour, the wire mesh is laid on the underlying surface and then raised and one of chairs
10
placed beneath it, preferably at an intersection, with the notch
40
,
42
or
46
,
48
corresponding to the size of the wire mesh facing up. The wire is pushed or dropped into the appropriate groove and the chair
10
lowered to rest on the underlying surface. Because the chair
10
is on edge, the load of the wire mesh is transferred to the underlying surface by the vertical walls
12
,
14
,
16
,
18
. Concrete is poured into the prepared area and finished in a conventional manner.
Referring to
FIG. 7
, there is illustrated a chair
60
having an improved notch
62
for receiving wire mesh. In particular, the notch
62
is sized and shaped so wire being supported in the notch is snapped into the notch
62
past a restriction which is slightly smaller than the wire. In this manner, the wire is captivated to the chair
60
and the chair
60
is not easily dislodged from the wire. To this end, the notch
62
comprises a pair of diverging edges
64
which act to direct a wire
66
toward a slot
68
in the wall
70
of the chair
60
. At the junction of the edges
64
and the slot
68
are a pair of shoulders or bumps
72
which are spaced apart smaller than the diameter of the wire
66
. Thus, if the notch
62
is designed to receive ⅛″ diameter wire, the bumps
72
are spaced apart on the order of 0.100 inches and the slot
68
is on the order of 0.160 wide. There is sufficient flexibility in the wall
70
to allow the wire
66
to pass between the shoulders
72
. The depth of the slot
66
is subject to wide variation and typically is greater than ⅜″. All of the notches
62
on one side of the chair
60
are of the same size so wire mesh can be supported at the intersection and all of the notches
62
on the other side of the chair
60
are of a different size.
Although this invention has been disclosed and described in its preferred forms with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred forms is only by way of example and that numerous changes in the details of construction and operation and in the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
Claims
- 1. A chair for supporting metal reinforcements used in a concrete pour, comprisinga first set of generally parallel walls and a second set of generally parallel walls intersecting the first set of walls and providing a cavity therebetween; a plurality of the walls providing a groove opening through an exterior of the walls, at least some of the grooves being of different width to receive and support rebar of different thickness; and a brace extending from each groove to an opposite wall.
- 2. The chair of claim 1 wherein the first walls are longer than the second walls.
- 3. The chair of claim 2 wherein at least some of the grooves in the first wall are of smaller width than at least some of the grooves in the second wall thereby positioning reinforcements in the grooves of the first wall closer to an underlying surface than reinforcements in the grooves of the second wall.
- 4. The chair of claim 3 wherein one of the grooves in the first wall is of the same width as one of the grooves in the second wall.
- 5. The chair of claim 2 wherein at least one of the first walls provides an elongate slot opening from the cavity through the first wall.
- 6. The chair of claim 5 wherein the slot opens through an edge of the first wall.
- 7. The chair of claim 2 wherein the chair is a generally rectangular box.
- 8. The chair of claim 2 wherein a first wall groove is located along a centerline of each of the first walls and the brace extending between the first walls extends between the first wall grooves.
- 9. The chair of claim 8 wherein a second wall groove is located along a centerline of each the second walls and the brace extending between the second walls extends between the second wall grooves.
- 10. The chair of claim 1 wherein the walls intersect perpendicularly.
- 11. The chair of claim 10 wherein edges of the first and second walls incline to the intersections.
- 12. The chair of claim 1 wherein the walls provide first and second peripheral edges on opposite sides of the chair and further comprisinga first pair of aligned notches in an edge of the first periphery having a first width for receiving and supporting a wire of a first thickness; and a second pair of aligned notches in an edge of the second periphery having a second width greater than the first width for receiving and supporting a wire of a second thickness different than the first thickness.
- 13. The chair of claim 12 wherein the first pair of notches are in an edge of grooves in the first wall.
- 14. The chair of claim 13 wherein the second pair of notches are in an edge of grooves in the first wall.
- 15. The chair of claim 1 wherein the walls provide first and second peripheral edges on opposite sides of the chair and further comprisinga first pair of aligned notches in an edge of the first periphery having a width for receiving and supporting a wire of a predetermined thickness; and a second pair of aligned notches in an edge of the first periphery having a width for receiving and supporting a wire of a same predetermined thickness, the first and second pair of aligned notches defining perpendicular axes for receiving perpendicular wires therebetween.
- 16. A chair for supporting metal reinforcements used in a concrete pour, comprisinga first set of generally parallel walls and a second set of generally parallel walls intersecting the first set of walls and providing a cavity therebetween; a plurality of the walls providing a groove opening through an exterior of the walls, the grooves being of different width to receive and support rebar of different thickness; a first pair of aligned notches in an edge of the first wall for receiving and supporting a mesh of wire of a first thickness; and a second pair of aligned notches in an edge of the second wall for receiving and supporting a mesh of wire of a second thickness different than the first thickness.
- 17. A chair for supporting metal reinforcements used in a concrete pour, comprisinga polygonal shell forming a cavity and including a set of generally parallel first walls and a set of second walls intersecting the first set of walls; and a plurality of the walls providing a groove opening through an exterior of the walls, the grooves in the first walls being of different width to receive and support rebar of different thickness; the polygonal shell being supportable on an underlying surface by a first of the first walls and the groove in a second of the first walls being spaced a first predetermined distance from an underlying surface, the polygonal shell being supportable on an underlying surface by one of the second walls and the groove in an opposite wall being spaced a second predetermined distance, different from the first predetermined distance, from the underlying surface.
- 18. The chair of claim 17 wherein the polygonal shell is rectangular, the first walls being longer than the second walls, the first walls having at least some grooves smaller than the grooves of the second walls.
US Referenced Citations (10)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
2006314 |
May 1979 |
GB |