Chair with flexible, resilient back support

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6779846
  • Patent Number
    6,779,846
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 6, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A chair with a flexible resilient back support structure includes a hollow tubular seat frame, a hollow tubular backrest frame pivotally connected to the seat frame, and a limit stop affixed to the backrest frame or the seat frame adjacent to the pivot points. The limit stop is configured to limit a degree of rotation of the backrest frame between an upright position and a maximum backwardly rotated position. An elongate spring element extends from within the backrest frame into the seat frame, and is configured to bias the backrest frame in the upright position, and to resiliently resist backward rotation. In various embodiments, a cam surface is associated with the spring element, providing an effective fulcrum point which moves rearwardly as the backrest frame reclines, thereby increasing the effective flexural resistance of the spring element during reclining.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to chairs with flexible backrests. More particularly, the present invention relates to a chair having a back support structure that is resiliently hingedly coupled to the seat and supporting structure.




2. Related Art




Reclining chairs are generally considered more comfortable than non-reclining chairs. Of the variety of reclining chairs, some comprise a chair with a fixed seat and a backrest that is configured to flex or recline backward relative to the seat. There are a variety of types of chairs with flexible or reclining backrests. Some of these involve very complicated reclining mechanisms. Some involve flexible members that bend along their length, while others include relatively rigid frame components that are hingedly coupled together in various locations.




Unfortunately, many of the reclining mechanisms that have been developed are not suitable to simple, relatively low-cost chairs, such as stackable banquet or meeting hall chairs. A bulky reclining mechanism is not suitable for stackable chairs, and an expensive mechanism is not desirable for locations such as hotels and the like, which require large numbers of chairs for banquets, conferences, etc.




Another problem with some simple reclining back chairs is the location where the chair reclines or bends. To be comfortable, a reclining chair should bend in a location that corresponds as closely as possible to the motion of the human body. Some flex-back chairs bend in places that actually make reclining less comfortable, and others merely tip back, without actually reclining. Both of these motions do not adequately address the structure and motion of the human body.




Additionally, some reclining mechanisms, particularly the more simple ones, present pinch points where a user's; fingers or other items can get caught. While there are various methods that have been devised for reducing, or hiding pinch points, many prior solutions have not adequately addressed the problem in an effective and inexpensive manner.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention advantageously provides a chair having a hollow tubular seat frame, a hollow tubular backrest frame pivotally connected to the seat frame at fixed pivot points, a limit stop, affixed to the backrest frame and the seat frame adjacent to the pivot points, and a substantially solid elongate spring element, extending from within the backrest frame into the seat frame. The limit stop is configured to limit a degree of rotation of the backrest frame relative to the seat frame between an upright position and a maximum backwardly rotated position, and the spring element is configured to bias the backrest frame in the upright position, and to resiliently resist backward rotation of the backrest frame.




In accordance with a more detailed aspect of the present invention, in one embodiment the spring element includes a curved lower surface, providing an effective fulcrum point which moves rearwardly as the backrest frame is rotated backwardly, thereby increasing the effective flexural resistance of the spring element during backward rotation.




Additional features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side view of one embodiment of a chair having a flexible, resilient back support structure in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a top cross-sectional view of the chair of

FIG. 1

with the seat cushion removed.





FIG. 3

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

showing one embodiment of an internal limit stop.





FIG. 4

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

having an alternative embodiment of an internal limit stop.





FIG. 5

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

having an external limit stop.





FIG. 6

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

, wherein the spring member is maintained in place with a wedge.





FIG. 7

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

, wherein the spring member is maintained in place with an adjustable hold down member.





FIG. 8

is a side, cross-sectional view of the flexible joint of the chair of

FIG. 1

, wherein the spring element is disposed against the upper inner surface of the seat frame member.





FIG. 9

is a cross-sectional view of the of

FIG. 3

, looking downward, showing the top plates disposed inside tubular frame members.





FIG. 10

is a bottom outside view of the external limit stop mechanism of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 11

is a side, cross-sectional view of the external limit stop depicted in FIGS.


5


and


10


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will,be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the invention.




Referring to FIG.


1


and

FIG. 2

, the present invention is depicted as applied to a common type of stackable banquet chair


10


. It will be apparent, however, that the present invention is also adaptable to many other types of chairs. The chair


10


includes a hollow tubular seat frame


12


, and a hollow tubular backrest frame


14


. In typical stackable banquet chairs, the backrest frame is an extension of the seat frame, and the seat frame is fixedly attached to chair leg frame members


16


, such as by welding along its two sides. An armrest assembly


18


, shown in dashed lines in

FIG. 1

, may also be rigidly attached to the backrest frame for added comfort.




The present invention improves on the standard chair of this type by providing a resiliently reclining backrest. The backrest frame


14


is pivotally connected to the seat frame with hinges


20


on each side below the seat


22


. Rather than the backrest and seat frame being formed of a continuous tubular member, the seat frame


12


and backrest frame


14


are discontinuous but aligned, and are joined by the hinge


20


. The pivot point of the hinge is therefore external to the tubular frame, and allows the backrest to rotate about a pivoting axis (


24


in

FIG. 2

) relative to the seat frame, between an upright position, as shown in solid lines in

FIG. 1

, and a maximum backwardly rotated position, shown in dashed lines in FIG.


1


. In one embodiment of the invention, the maximum backwardly rotated position is at an angle α of about 13.5° relative to the upright position. It will be apparent, however, that other angles could also be used.




Advantageously, the hinged connection


20


is disposed below the chair seat


22


, so that mating ends of the respective tubular frame members are mostly hidden from view and from access. It will be apparent that in the region of a hinge, there is the possibility of creating,a pinch point wherein fingers and other objects could get squeezed in the hinge when it closes. By locating the hinge below the seat, the top and outer side of the hinge mechanism are completely covered. The only exposed portions of the hinge are the bottom, where the hinge pin


26


is located (thus not presenting a pinch point) and the inner side of it (i.e. the side toward the center of the chair). By virtue of its inner location, this side of the hinge presents a substantially limited chance of coming into contact with fingers and other objects. Additionally, the design of the limit stop and spring elements as described below also helps to reduce the likelihood and seriousness of any pinching.




The chair


10


includes limit stops to limit the degree of rotation a of the backrest frame


14


, and a resilient spring member for (i) biasing the backrest in the upright position, and (ii) resiliently resisting reclining. The limit stops may be configured in a variety of ways, three embodiments of which are shown in

FIGS. 3-5

. The embodiments shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

are internal to the tubular frame members. That shown in

FIG. 6

is an external limit stop, being affixed to the outside of the tubular frame members.




The limit stop depicted in

FIGS. 3 and 9

comprises a stop plate


30


, which is affixed within the backrest frame


14


and extends into the seat frame


12


. The stop plate is vertically oriented, and has an upper, sloped stop surface


32


, and a lower surface


34


. In practice, in the embodiments of FIG.


3


and

FIG. 4

, two stop plates are used, one against each inner side of the respective tubes. The orientation of these two parallel plates are more clearly shown in the cross-sectional view of FIG.


9


. The space between the plates is open for passage of the spring element


36


, as more fully described below. The stop plates


30


include a hinge loop


38


which extends below the frame through corresponding slots


40


in the ends of each tube. The two opposing hinge loops function as the female portion of the hinge


20


. A stiffener


42


is attached (i.e. welded) to the seat frame adjacent the hinge, and includes a corresponding hinge loop (not shown) that fits between the hinge loops of the stop plates, serving as the male portion of the hinge. With the hinge loops of the stop plates and stiffener aligned, the hinge pin


26


is inserted therethrough to join the backrest frame to the seat frame and create the external pivot point.




The lower surface


34


of the stop plate


30


is configured to abut the lower inside surface


46


of the tubular seat frame member


12


when the backrest


14


is in the upright position. Because the stop plate is attached to the backrest frame, it rotates with the backrest frame such that its sloped stop surface


32


abuts the upper inner surface


48


of the hollow seat frame member when the backrest is in the fully reclined position, as shown in dashed lines in FIG.


3


.




It will be apparent that the stop plates


30


could alternatively be affixed within the seat frame


12


(rather than the backrest frame) and extend into the backrest frame


14


(rather than the seat frame), and still perform in a similar manner. In such a situation, the upper and lower surfaces


32


and


34


of the limit stops would press against the upper and lower surfaces of the backrest frame when in the reclined and upright positions, respectively.




The limit stop can also be configured in other ways. Referring to

FIG. 4

, the limit stop may comprise a horizontal stop bar


50


extending from the open end of the seat frame tube


12


, and having a back side


52


. A pair of vertical stop plates


54


(disposed on opposing interior sides of the tubular frame members in a manner similar to the stop plates


30


of

FIG. 9

) are disposed within the backrest frame and extend into the seat frame, and include a curved, elongate slot


56


, which generally surrounds the stop bar


50


. The elongate slot includes a forward surface


58


that is configured to abut a front side


60


of the stop bar when the backrest frame


14


is in the upright position, and a rearward stop surface


62


configured to abut the back side


52


of the stop bar when the backrest frame is in the maximum backwardly rotated position, indicated by dashed lines in FIG.


4


. It will be apparent that the stop bar


50


could alternatively be affixed within the backrest frame, with the stop plates


54


affixed within the seat frame


12


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 4

, the stop plates also include hinge loops


64


that extend below the tubular frame members, and in conjunction with the stiffener


42


, form the hinge


20


in the same manner as the embodiment of FIG.


3


.




As yet another alternative, the limit stop may be external to the tubular frame. Referring to

FIGS. 5

,


10


, and


11


, in an alternative embodiment, the limit stop comprises part of the hinge


20


, and is disposed on the outside of the tubular chair frame members. The hinge comprises a first male hinge member


70


affixed to the seat frame


12


, and a second female hinge member


72


affixed to the backrest frame


14


, with the hinge pin


26


pivotally connecting these two structures along the pivotal axis


24


. An extension of the first male hinge member


70


comprises a stop member


74


, which fits into a slot


76


formed in the interior of the second female hinge member. The stop member has a sloped stop surface


78


, and is configured to rotate into the slot as the backrest is reclined, to eventually reach a position where the stop surface abuts an upper inner surface


80


of the slot when the hinge reaches the maximum rotated position. Between those two positions, rotation is uninhibited. The stop surface mechanically prevents rotation beyond the fully reclined position, which position is determined by the geometry of the stop surface relative to the upper surface of the slot.




One of the advantages of this configuration is that it essentially eliminates any external pinch points. The exposed bottom side of the stop member


74


is flush with the bottom surface of the female hinge member


72


when the backrest


14


is in the upright position, and pivots into the enclosed slot


76


as the backrest frame reclines. Thus there is no way a person can get their fingers disposed between the stop surface


78


and the upper inner surface


80


of the slot, or insert their fingers into a side or edge gap between the moving parts.




It will be apparent that the limit stop mechanism shown in

FIGS. 5

,


10


, and


11


could be configured in different ways and still function equally well. For example, the stop member


74


could be configured to abut an outer surface of one of the tubes, rather than a surface of one of the hinge members. Additionally, the two members of the hinge


20


could be affixed to the tubular frame in an orientation opposite to that shown.




Referring to

FIGS. 6-8

, extending from within each end of the seat frame


12


into the corresponding open end of the backrest frame


14


is a substantially solid elongate spring element


36


. The forward end


82


of the spring element is held firmly in place within the seat frame tube, and extends to a point of contact P


c


at its rearward end


84


inside the backrest frame. The spring element acts as a cantilever beam, resiliently resisting reclining of the backrest frame from the upright position.




As can be seen from the drawings, the spring element


36


is presumably slightly bent when the backrest


14


is in the upright position. The position and orientation of the spring element is designed such that it is under a certain amount of pre-applied bending stress or pre-load stress when the chair back is in the upright position. This pre-load stress biases the backrest frame in the upright position, and also helps compensate for slight gradual loss of flexural resistance over the life of the spring member.




The spring element


36


may be formed of a variety of materials, including metals and polymers. Suitable polymer materials may include fiber-reinforced composites, ABS plastic, synthetic or natural rubber. One material used by the inventors is extruded fiberglass resin. However, other At the point of contact P


c


with the backrest frame


14


, the rearward end


84


of the spring element includes a nylon wear button


86


, which allows the end of the spring element to smoothly slide against the inside of the tube. Because fiberglass resin is a relatively rough, fibrous material, the inventor has found that where a fiberglass spring element is disposed in direct contact with the inside of the tube, the reclining action can be slightly jerky because of friction between the fiberglass spring element and the steel tube. Nylon provides far less friction, and allows a smoother reclining action. Additionally, the wear button provides an additional measure of pre-load force on the spring element.




Alternatively, an anti-friction end cap


88


, shown in

FIG. 8

, may be placed on the rearward end


84


of the spring element


36


to help reduce friction at the point of contact P


c


. This configuration also has the advantage that it provides a larger area of contact between the spring, element and the inside of the tube, thereby reducing the stress imposed on the tube by the spring element. The inventor has found that with long-term repeated reclining, a wear button


86


can produce a bulge in the tubular frame member at its point of contact. By spreading out the area of contact with an end cap, this deformation is prevented. The nylon button or end cap also provide the advantage of gradually wearing to a more conforming shape, thereby further distributing loads over a larger area.




The spring element


36


may be configured and installed in various ways, as shown in

FIGS. 6-8

. In the embodiment of

FIG. 6

, the forward end


82


of the spring element


36




a


is held firmly against the lower inner surface


46


of the seat frame


12


by a wedge


90


that is fixed in place within the tube. Alternatively, as shown in

FIG. 7

, the forward end of the spring element may be held in place by a hold-down assembly


92


, disposed within the hollow seat frame. The hold-down assembly includes a clamp


94


, which is attached to the forward end of the spring element, and an adjustment screw


96


extending through the lower side of the seat frame. Rotation of the adjustment screw (indicated by arrow


98


) results in vertical movement of the clamp (indicated by arrow


100


) and thus adjusts the distance between the forward end of the spring element and the lower inner surface of the seat frame. This allows adjustment of the biasing force provided by the spring element by adding to or reducing the pre-applied bending stress in the spring element.




The spring element


36




a


of

FIGS. 6 and 7

includes a longitudinally curved lower surface


102


, which acts as a cam. The cam surface diverges from the lower inner surface


46


of the seat frame


12


along its length. The initial point of contact of the curved surface with the lower tube surface functions as a fulcrum point P


f


. It will be apparent that the bending length of the spring element, and hence its flexural resistance, will vary depending upon the distance of the fulcrum point P


f


from the point of contact P


c


with the upper inner surface of the backrest frame. Advantageously, because the lower surface of the spring element is curved, the location of the fulcrum point P


f


will move rearwardly (i.e. closer to the point of contact P


c


with the backrest frame) as the backrest frame is rotated backwardly and the spring element flexes, as shown in dashed lines in

FIGS. 6 and 7

. This rearward movement of the effective fulcrum point has the effect of reducing the bending length of the rearward portion of the spring element, thereby increasing its leverage and effective flexural resistance during rotation. Thus, the resistance to reclining increases as the degree of reclining increases. This can be desirable because more of the weight of a person's body is shifted to the backrest as the person reclines, and thus more resistance is required to provide the same support.




In another alternative embodiment, shown in

FIG. 8

, the flexural spring element


36




b


may have a constant cross-sectional shape. In this embodiment, the spring element is disposed such that its forward portion


82




b


is disposed near the upper inner surface


48


of the seat frame


12


, and its rearward portion


84


abuts the upper inner surface of the backrest frame. The forward end is firmly held in a receiving slot


104


in a spring retainer


1106


that is disposed (such as by a press fit) within the tubular seat frame. The spring retainer includes a hold-down wedge


108


above the end of the spring element


36




b


, for biasing the spring member in a slightly upward orientation so as to provide the pre-load force discussed above. The spring retainer also includes a cam surface


110


disposed below the spring element and toward the hinge


20


for supporting the spring element during bending, and-for providing a rearwardly-moving fulcrum point, as discussed above.




Any of the various configurations of the spring elements shown in

FIGS. 6-8

may be combined with any of the various limit stop configurations of

FIGS. 3-5

. One advantage of the embodiment of

FIG. 5

is that the spring element


36


may be wider than that used with the embodiments of

FIG. 3

or


4


. As noted above, the limit stop embodiments of

FIGS. 3 and 4

include two vertically oriented stop plates disposed against each inner side of the tube, allowing the spring element to be disposed therebetween. Consequently, the spring element must be narrower than the inside of the tube by an amount at least equal to the sum of the thicknesses of the two stop plates. This condition is depicted in FIG.


9


. Naturally, where the spring element is narrower, it will provide less flexural resistance than a wider spring element of the same material and same thickness. Additionally, with a narrower spring element, the stress imposed at the rearward bearing end of the spring element will be higher because the bearing surface is narrower.




By placing the limit stop outside of the tubular frame, the embodiment of

FIG. 5

allows the full width of the tube to be occupied by the spring element


36


. Thus a wider (and therefore stronger) spring element may be used. Additionally, a spring element having a constant cross-section is less expensive to manufacture and easier to install. This reduces the cost and complexity of fabrication of the chair. This configuration is also more durable. The inventors have found that a chair having a reclining mechanism that combines the features of FIG.


5


and FIG.


8


can be flexed and released several million cycles with no significant deterioration.




It will be apparent that the spring element


36


, rather than being fixed within the seat frame tube


12


and extending into the backrest frame tube


14


, may instead be fixed within the backrest frame tube and extend into the seat frame tube. Likewise, there are a variety of suitable methods of fixing an end of the spring element within one of the chair frame tubes other than those described above. For example, where the forward end


82


is disposed near the upper inner surface


48


of the seat frame, and the rearward end


84


also abuts the upper inner surface of the backrest frame, a wedge (not shown) may be used to maintain the spring element in contact with the upper inner surface of the seat frame, rather than the spring retainer


106


shown in FIG.


8


. Likewise, a separate downwardly sloping cam surface (not shown), like that associated with the spring retainer, could be disposed adjacent the fixed pivot point, to support the spring element during bending, and for providing a rearwardly-moving fulcrum point, as discussed above.




Advantageously, because the backrest frame


14


is hingedly connected to the seat frame


12


, failure of the spring element


36


in any of the embodiments disclosed herein will not cause the backrest frame to become detached from the seat frame. Rather, it will merely cause the backrest frame to flop backward and come to rest in the maximum backwardly reclined position. In this condition, the chair can be repaired by removing the backrest (i.e. disassembling the hinges


20


), replacing the spring element, and reattaching the hinges.




Both the internal and external limit stop configurations disclosed above advantageously reduce and hide possible pinch points. With the external limit stop, fingers etc. cannot get between the stop surfaces because of the design of the stop member


74


and its corresponding slot


76


(See

FIGS. 5

,


10


,


11


). With the internal limit stop, the stop surfaces are enclosed within the tubular frame, and therefore are protected from objects entering therebetween. Because the stop plates are disposed against the sides of the tubular frame members, as depicted in

FIG. 9

, the stop plates themselves substantially prevent anything from being inserted into the gap between the tubes farther than the thickness of the tube walls themselves. Thus, in the unlikely event of a person getting their finger into that gap, any injury would be very minor, and would be limited to a pinch of the skin.




It is to be understood that the above-referenced arrangements are only illustrative of the application for the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention while the present invention has been shown in the drawings and fully described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments(s) of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth in the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A chair, comprising:a) a hollow tubular seat frame, having at least two spaced apart open ends; b) a hollow tubular backrest frame, having a pair of spaced apart open ends aligned with and pivotally connected to the open ends of the seat frame at fixed pivot points; c) a limit stop, affixed to each of one of the backrest frame and the seat frame, configured to limit a degree of rotation of the backrest frame relative to the seat frame between an upright position and a maximum backwardly rotated position; and d) a substantially solid elongate spring element, extending from within each open end of the backrest frame into the corresponding open end of the seat frame, configured to bias the backrest frame in the upright position, and to resiliently resist backward rotation of the backrest frame.
  • 2. A chair in accordance with claim 1, wherein the limit stop is disposed within each of one of the backrest frame and the seat frame, and extends into the corresponding open end of the other one of the seat frame and the backrest frame.
  • 3. A chair in accordance with claim 1, wherein the spring element abuts the lower inner surface of the seat frame and an upper inner surface of the backrest frame.
  • 4. A chair in accordance with claim 3, wherein the spring element further comprises a longitudinally curved lower surface producing a fulcrum point of contact of the spring element with the lower inner surface of the seat frame, the curved lower surface causing the effective position of the fulcrum point to move rearwardly as the backrest frame is rotated backwardly, thereby increasing the effective flexural resistance of the spring element during said rotation.
  • 5. A chair in accordance with claim 3, further comprising a wedge disposed between the upper inner surface of the seat frame and the adjacent portion of the spring element, so as to maintain the spring element in contact with the lower inner surface of the seat frame.
  • 6. A chair in accordance with claim 3, further comprising a hold-down assembly, disposed within the seat frame hollow member, and attached to an end of the spring element, configured to hold the spring element toward the lower inner surface of the seat frame.
  • 7. A chair in accordance with claim 6, wherein the hold-down assembly includes an adjustment screw extending through a lower side of the seat frame hollow member, so as to allow adjustment of the biasing force provided by the spring element.
  • 8. A chair in accordance with claim 1, wherein the spring element abuts the upper inner surface of the seat frame and an upper inner surface of the backrest frame.
  • 9. A chair in accordance with claim 8, further comprising a wedge disposed between the lower inner surface of the seat frame and the adjacent portion of the spring element, so as to maintain the spring element in contact with the upper inner surface of the seat frame.
  • 10. A chair in accordance with claim 8, further comprising a downwardly sloping cam surface, disposed adjacent the fixed pivot point and below the spring element, configured to allow downward bending of the spring element during backward rotation of the backrest frame, and to provide a fulcrum point of contact between the cam surface and the spring element, such that the effective location of the fulcrum point moves rearwardly as the backrest frame is rotated backwardly, thereby increasing the effective flexural resistance of the spring element during said rotation.
  • 11. A chair in accordance with claim 1, wherein the spring element is formed of a material selected from the group consisting of metals and polymers.
  • 12. A chair in accordance with claim 11, wherein the polymers include fiber-reinforced composites, rubber, plastic.
  • 13. A chair in accordance with claim 12, wherein the spring element is formed of fiberglass resin.
  • 14. A chair in accordance with claim 1, further comprising an armrest assembly fixedly attached to the backrest frame.
  • 15. A chair in accordance with claim 1, wherein the fixed pivot points comprise mechanical hinges having pivotally connected hinge members externally disposed on the seat frame and the backrest frame, and the limit stop comprises a stop member attached to one of the hinge members and configured to pivot from a first position wherein relative rotation of the hinge members is permitted, to a mechanically stopped position wherein relative rotation of the hinge members is prevented.
  • 16. A chair in accordance with claim 15, wherein the stop member comprises an extension of a first one of the hinge members, and wherein the stop member includes a stop surface configured to abut a surface of a second one of the hinge members when in the mechanically stopped position.
  • 17. A chair, comprising:a) a tubular frame, having seat frame and backrest frame portions; b) a hinge, pivotally connecting the seat frame and backrest frame together at a fixed pivot point; c) a limit stop, affixed to one of the seat frame and backrest frame portions, configured to limit a degree of rotation of the backrest frame relative to the seat frame between an upright position and a maximum backwardly rotated position; d) an elongate flexural spring element, biased within the seat frame and the backrest frame adjacent to the pivot point, configured to bias the backrest in the upright position, and to resiliently resist backward rotation of the backrest portion; and e) a cam surface, associated with the spring element, providing an effective fulcrum point of contact with the spring element which moves rearwardly as the backrest frame is rotated backwardly, thereby increasing the effective flexural resistance of the spring element during said rotation.
  • 18. A chair in accordance with claim 17, wherein the limit stop comprises a stop member, affixed to one of the backrest frame and the seat frame, having a stop surface configured to move from a first position wherein relative rotation of the seat frame and backrest frame portions is permitted, to a mechanically stopped position wherein relative rotation of the seat frame and backrest frame portions is prevented configured.
US Referenced Citations (27)
Number Name Date Kind
3057660 Schneider Oct 1962 A
3712666 Stoll Jan 1973 A
4451085 Franck et al. May 1984 A
4498702 Raftery Feb 1985 A
4549764 Haedo Oct 1985 A
4557521 Lange Dec 1985 A
4580836 Verney Apr 1986 A
4585272 Ballarini Apr 1986 A
4603904 Tolleson et al. Aug 1986 A
4756575 Dicks Jul 1988 A
4790595 Hensel et al. Dec 1988 A
4869552 Tolleson et al. Sep 1989 A
4913493 Heidmann Apr 1990 A
5039163 Tolleson Aug 1991 A
5108149 Ambasz Apr 1992 A
5871258 Battey et al. Feb 1999 A
5887946 Raftery Mar 1999 A
5902012 Han May 1999 A
5904397 Fismen May 1999 A
5975634 Knoblock et al. Nov 1999 A
5988746 Raftery Nov 1999 A
6065803 Li et al. May 2000 A
6349992 Knoblock et al. Feb 2002 B1
6406096 Barile, Sr. Jun 2002 B1
6471293 Ware et al. Oct 2002 B2
6533352 Glass et al. Mar 2003 B1
20020117883 Gevaert Aug 2002 A1