I. Field
The present invention relates generally to communication, and more specifically to channel estimation for a communication system.
II. Background
In a wireless communication system, a radio frequency (RF) modulated signal may travel via a number of signal paths from a transmitter to a receiver. If the signal paths have different delays, then a received signal at the receiver would include multiple instances of the transmitted signal at different gains and delays. This time dispersion in the wireless channel causes frequency selective fading, which is characterized by a frequency response that varies in magnitude and phase across the system bandwidth.
An accurate estimate of a wireless channel between the transmitter and the receiver is normally needed in order to effectively receive a data transmission sent by the transmitter. Channel estimation is typically performed by sending a pilot from the transmitter and measuring the pilot at the receiver. Since the pilot is made up of modulation symbols that are known a priori by the receiver, a channel response may be estimated as a ratio of the received pilot symbols to the transmitted pilot symbols.
Pilot transmission represents overhead in the system. Thus, it is desirable to minimize pilot transmission to the extent possible. This may be achieved by sending a “narrowband” pilot on a small portion of the system bandwidth and using this pilot to obtain a channel estimate (e.g., a frequency response estimate or an impulse response estimate) for the wireless channel. Regardless of whether the channel estimate is in the time domain or the frequency domain, the resolution of the channel estimate is generally limited by the bandwidth of the pilot used for channel estimation. Thus, a channel estimate with only coarse resolution may be obtained from a single transmission/instance of a narrowband pilot. This coarse channel estimate may provide poor performance if used by the receiver to recover the data transmission.
There is therefore a need in the art for techniques to derive a channel estimate with good resolution based on a narrowband pilot.
Techniques for obtaining an improved channel estimate with high resolution based on a narrowband pilot or a wideband pilot are described herein. These techniques may be used for a wireless or wireless multi-carrier communication system (e.g., an OFDM-based system) and may also be used for the forward link (or downlink) as well as the reverse link (or uplink).
In an embodiment for performing channel estimation, a first channel estimate is initially obtained for a communication channel (e.g., a wireless channel). This first channel estimate may be a frequency response estimate obtained from either (1) a narrowband pilot that is sent on different sets of subbands in different symbol periods or (2) a wideband pilot that is sent on all or a large number of subbands in the system. Spectral estimation is then performed on the first channel estimate to determine at least one frequency component of this channel estimate. If the first channel estimate is a frequency response estimate, then spectral estimation may be performed on channel gains for different subbands. Each frequency component of the frequency response estimate is indicative of a delay for a channel tap in an impulse response estimate for the wireless channel. The spectral estimation may be performed using various techniques, as described below. A second channel estimate for the wireless channel is then obtained based on the frequency component(s) determined by the spectral estimation.
The second channel estimate may comprise (1) an impulse response estimate for the wireless channel with L channel taps, where L≧1 (2) an improved frequency response estimate for the wireless channel with channel gains for up to N total subbands, (3) a channel profile indicative of the long-term time-averaged energy of the channel taps in the impulse response estimate for the wireless channel, (4) a delay value indicative of an arrival time of a signal transmitted via the wireless channel, or (5) some other pertinent information regarding the wireless channel. The second channel estimate may be used in various manners. For example, the channel gains of the improved frequency response estimate may be used for matched filtering or equalization of a data transmission received via the wireless channel. The delay value for the arrival time may be used for time synchronization of the data transmission.
Various aspects and embodiments of the invention are described in further detail below.
The features and nature of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs.
The channel estimation techniques described herein may be used for various wireless and wireline multi-carrier communication systems. Multiple carriers may be obtained with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), discrete multi tone (DMT), some other multi-carrier modulation techniques, or some other construct. OFDM effectively partitions the overall system bandwidth into multiple (N) orthogonal subbands, which are also referred to as tones, subcarriers, bins, and frequency channels. With OFDM, each subband is associated with a respective subcarrier that may be modulated with data.
For clarity, the channel estimation techniques are described below for a wireless OFDM-based system. One such system is an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) system that can support communication for multiple wireless terminals simultaneously. With OFDM, up to N modulation symbols (e.g., for data and/or pilot) may be sent on the N total subbands in each OFDM symbol period (or simply, “symbol period”). These modulation symbols are converted to the time-domain with an N-point inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) to obtain a “transformed” symbol that contains N time-domain samples or chips. To combat inter-symbol interference (ISI), which is caused by frequency selective fading, C chips of the transformed symbol are repeated to form an OFDM symbol that contains N+C chips, where C is typically a fraction (e.g., ¼ or ⅛) of N. The C repeated chips are often referred to as a cyclic prefix, and C is the cyclic prefix length.
Data and pilot may be transmitted in various manners in an OFDM-based system. Several exemplary transmission schemes are described below.
As shown in
The channel estimation techniques described herein may be used in conjunction with various transmission schemes. These techniques may be used for a narrowband pilot that may be transmitted as shown in
A wireless channel in an OFDM-based system may be characterized by either a time-domain channel impulse response or a corresponding frequency-domain channel frequency response. As used herein, and which is consistent with conventional terminology, a “channel impulse response” is a time-domain response of the channel, and a “channel frequency response” is a frequency-domain response of the channel. In a sampled-data system, the channel frequency response is a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the channel impulse response. For clarity, in the following description, a channel impulse response is composed of a sequence of “channel taps”, with each channel tap being defined by a channel tap gain (or simply, “tap gain”) and a channel tap delay (or simply, “tap delay”). A channel frequency response is composed of a set of “channel gains”, with each channel gain being for a specific subband.
The channel impulse response may be represented in the z-domain by an L-tap finite impulse response (FIR) filter, H(z), as follows:
where z−1 denotes a delay of one sample (or chip) period and z−d
h=[h1 h2 . . . hL]T, Eq (2)
where “T” denotes a transpose.
A channel profile may be defined as follows:
P=diagh·hT Eq (3)
where denotes a time-averaging operation;
A diagonal matrix contains possible non-zero values along the diagonal and zeros elsewhere. The diagonal elements of P represent a channel profile defined by h. The channel profile is indicative of the long-term time-averaged energy of the channel taps in the channel impulse response. The channel profile does not include short-term effects such as fading, Doppler, and so on. The channel profile is thus indicative of the reflectivity/transmissivity of a medium via which a signal may travel.
A frequency-domain channel gain may be estimated for each subband used for pilot transmission, as follows:
where yk is a received pilot symbol for subband k;
M channel gains {Hk} for M subbands used for pilot transmission may be estimated based on pilot symbols received on these subbands, as shown in equation (4). The channel gains are frequency-domain values. Each channel gain may be expressed as a Fourier transform of the L (unknown) time-domain channel taps, as follows:
where ωi=2πdi/N is an angular frequency (in radians) for the i-th channel tap; and
Equation (5) may be expressed in matrix form, as follows:
where Q is an M×L “Fourier-type” matrix containing the elements shown in equation (6) and n is an L×1 noise vector.
The pilot may be transmitted on different sets of M subbands in different time intervals (e.g., as shown in
Hb=QBh+n, Eq (8)
where B is an L×L diagonal matrix given by B=diag (ejbω
An M×M correlation (or outer product) matrix of H may be defined as H·HH, where “H” denotes a conjugate transpose. A long-term time-average of the correlation matrix of H, denoted as R, may be expressed as:
R=H·HH=Q·P·QH+σ2·I. Eq (9)
Equation (9) is obtained based on equations (3), (7), and (8). The b offset values may be appropriately selected (e.g., in a pseudo-random manner as shown in
Eigenvalue decomposition may be performed on the matrix R as follows:
R=V·D·VH Eq(10)
where V is an M×M unitary matrix of eigenvectors of R; and
The M diagonal elements of D are referred to as eigenvalues of R. The M columns of V are referred to as eigenvectors of R. Each column of V corresponds to one eigenvalue in D. Thus, the first or leftmost column of V corresponds to the diagonal element in the first column of D, the second column of V corresponds to the diagonal element in the second column of D, and so on.
The M eigenvalues in D may be ordered from smallest to largest and denoted as {λ1, λ2, . . . λM} after the ordering, where λ1 is the smallest eigenvalue and λM is the largest eigenvalue. When the eigenvalues in D are ordered, the eigenvectors in V are ordered correspondingly. The M−L smallest eigenvalues in D (i.e., λ1 through λM−L) are equal to the noise variance σ2 and are referred to as “noise” eigenvalues. The M−L eigenvectors in V corresponding to the M−L noise eigenvalues (i.e., the M−L leftmost columns of V after the ordering) are referred to as “noise” eigenvectors of R and are denoted as {r1, r2, . . . rM−L}. The noise eigenvectors are orthogonal to the columns of Q.
The L tap gains/power are contained in the matrix P and the L tap delays are contained in the matrix Q. Each of the L columns of Q has the following form:
ql=[1, ej2π(l−1)/N, ej2π(l−1)/N, . . . ej2π(M−1)(l−1)/N], Eq(11)
where l is an index representing an unknown tap delay and is within a range of 1 through N, or lε{1, 2, . . . N}.
A cost function may be defined as follows:
The L unknown tap delays may be obtained based on the cost function C(l), as follows. The cost function is evaluated for each of the N possible values of l, i.e., for l=1, 2, . . . N. Each value of l represents a hypothesized delay value for a channel tap. For each value of l, the vector ql is first determined as shown in equation (11) and multiplied with each of the M−L noise eigenvectors to obtain M−L inner products, gk=qlH·rk for k=1, 2, . . . M−L. The power of each inner product is computed as |gk|2=gk·gk*, where “*” denotes a complex conjugate. The powers of the M−L inner products are then summed, and the inverse of the summed power is provided as a cost value Cl for this value of l. N cost values, Cl for l=1, 2, . . . N, are obtained for N possible values of l.
Since the columns of Q are orthogonal to the noise eigenvectors, the inner product of any column of Q with any noise eigenvector is small or zero. Consequently, the summed power of the M−L inner products for each column of Q is small, and the inverse of this summed power is large. The L largest values among the N cost values are then identified. The L values of l corresponding to these L largest cost values represent the L unknown tap delays for the channel impulse response. These L identified values of l may be used to form the matrix Q. The L tap gains may then be derived as follows:
hb=B−1Q−1Hb, Eq (13)
where Hb is an M×1 vector for the frequency response estimate for one set of M pilot subbands; and
A “full” channel impulse response estimate with N taps (denoted by a vector hN) may be formed based on the averaged channel impulse response estimate with L taps, hL. The N×1 vector hN would contain all L elements of the L×1 vector hL at the proper tap indices (which are determined by the L values of l corresponding to the L largest cost values) and N−L zeros at all other tap indices. A “full” channel frequency response estimate for all N subbands (denoted by a vector HN) may be obtained by performing an N-point fast Fourier transform (FFT) on the full channel impulse response estimate, hN, as follows:
HN=W·hN, Eq(14)
where W is an N×N Fourier matrix defined such that the (i,j)-th entry, wi,j, is given as:
where i is a row index and j is a column index. The full channel frequency response estimate, HN, may be used for matched filtering, equalization, and so on, of a data transmission received via the wireless channel.
In the above description, L denotes the number of channel taps to be estimated. In general, L may or may not be equal to the number of channel taps (Lact) in the actual impulse response of the wireless channel. If L=Lact<M, then the Lact channel taps may be estimated as described above. If L≠Lact and L<M, then L channel taps representative of a channel profile for the wireless channel may be obtained as described above. If L=1, then a single channel tap situated at the center of the channel profile (which is Lact long) may be obtained, so long as M is greater than one. The tap delay corresponding to this single channel tap (denoted as ds) may be used as an estimate of the arrival time of a signal transmitted via the wireless channel. In general, as M increases, more channel taps with good accuracy and high resolution may be estimated. For a wideband pilot with M being equal to or approaching N, a full channel impulse response with up to N taps may be estimated based on the wideband pilot.
The techniques described herein may be used to obtain an improved channel estimate. As used herein, a “channel estimate” may include any type and any combination of information for a wireless channel. For example, a channel estimate may comprise a channel profile, a set of channel gains for a frequency response estimate, a sequence of channel taps for an impulse response estimate, a single channel tap, an arrival time for a signal transmitted via the wireless channel, and/or some other pertinent information for the wireless channel.
Rm+1=Rm+H·HH, Eq (16)
where Rm is the correlation matrix for the m-th update interval.
A determination is then made whether the matrix R has been averaged over a sufficient number of OFDM symbols with pilot (block 318). If the answer is ‘no’, then the process returns to block 312 to receive and process another OFDM symbol with pilot. Otherwise, noise eigenvectors of the matrix R are obtained as described above (block 320). The cost function C(l) is then computed based on the noise eigenvectors and for N possible values of l, e.g., as shown in equation (12) (block 322). The channel profile is then identified based on the cost values obtained for the cost function C(l), as described above (block 324). A channel estimate may then be derived based on the identified channel profile (block 326). For example, a channel impulse response estimate may be obtained as shown in equation (13), and a channel frequency response estimate may be obtained as shown in equation (14). The process then returns to block 312 to obtain another channel estimate.
Channel estimates may also be obtained based on a running average of the matrix R. For example, the matrix R may be updated in block 316 based on an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter, as follows:
Rm+1=α·Rm+(1−α)·H·HH, (Eq(17)
where α is a coefficient that determines the amount of averaging. A larger value for α corresponds to more averaging. Process 300 may then be modified to transition from block 326 to block 314 (instead of block 312). An updated channel profile and channel estimate may then be obtained, e.g., whenever an OFDM symbol with pilot is received.
The channel estimation as described above is based on recognition that the unknown tap delays (di for i=1, 2, . . . L) to be ascertained are unknown frequency components (ωi for i=1, 2, . . . L) of the available frequency-domain channel gains. Spectral estimation (or spectral analysis) is then used to determine the unknown frequency components of the channel gains. These frequency components, once determined, serve as estimates of the unknown tap delays for a channel impulse response estimate.
For clarity, a specific spectral estimation technique, which is often referred to as a multiple signal classification (MUSIC) technique, is described above. Other spectral estimation techniques may also be used to ascertain the frequency components of the frequency response estimate (and thus the tap delays for the impulse response estimate), and this is within the scope of the invention. For example, the spectral estimation may be performed based on a periodogram technique, a Prony estimator, a Pisarenko harmonic decomposition technique, and so on. These various spectral estimation techniques, including the MUSIC technique, are described by S. L. Marple Jr. in “A Tutorial Overview of Modem Spectral Estimation,” Proc. IEEE, 1989, pp. 2152-2157, and by B. D. Kao and K. S. Arun in “Model Based Processing of Signals: A State Space Approach,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 80, No. 2, February 1992, pp. 283-309.
Spectral estimation is then performed on the frequency response estimate for the current received OFDM symbol and possibly frequency response estimates for prior received OFDM symbols to determine one or more frequency components of the frequency response estimate(s) (block 414). The spectral estimation may be based on the MUSIC, periodogram, Prony estimator, Pisarenko harmonic decomposition, or some other technique. Each spectral estimation technique typically employs some type of averaging to obtain a good estimate of the frequency component(s) being sought. A determination is then made whether to terminate the spectral estimation (block 416). The spectral estimation may be terminated based on various criteria such as, for example, after a predetermined number of OFDM symbols with pilot have been processed, if a computed error criterion is below a predetermined threshold, and so on. The termination criterion may be dependent on the spectral estimation technique selected for use. If the spectral estimation is to continue, as determined in block 416, then the process returns to block 412 to process another OFDM symbol with pilot. Otherwise, a channel estimate is obtained based on the frequency component(s) determined by the spectral estimation (block 418). For example, the channel estimate may include L channel taps and/or L tap delays for a channel impulse response estimate, where L≧1, channel gains for a channel frequency response estimate, the signal arrival time, the channel profile, and so on.
The techniques described herein may be used to obtain a channel estimate with good resolution even if the pilot is transmitted such that only a small portion of the system bandwidth is observable at any given time. If the pilot is sent on only M subbands at a time, where M may be much less than N, then a receiver can only observe the wireless channel over a relatively narrow band based on the pilot received on these M subbands. Consequently, a delay resolution of 1/M may be obtained based on the narrowband pilot for each set of M subbands, where 1/M is much more coarse than 1/N if M is much less than N. The techniques described herein can provide channel taps with a delay resolution of 1/N, which may be much better resolution than that possible with any one narrowband pilot transmission.
The techniques described herein may also be used to deal with excess delay spread. An OFDM-based system can withstand a delay spread that is smaller than or equal to the cyclic prefix length. The delay spread of a wireless channel is the time span (or duration) of the impulse response for the wireless channel, which is dlast−d1, where d1 is the earliest channel tap and dlast is the latest channel tap. If the delay spread is less than or equal to the cyclic prefix length, then the N subbands are orthogonal to one another. Excess delay spread occurs if the delay spread is greater than the cyclic prefix length. In this case, channel taps with delays greater than C (i.e., the “excess” portion of the channel impulse response) can cause various deleterious effects such as ISI and channel estimation errors, both of which can degrade system performance. Using the techniques described herein, the tap delays may be ascertained, and the excess portion of the channel impulse response may be identified. This knowledge of the presence of excess delay spread may be used to optimize a receiver “on the fly” for better performance. For example, the receiver may perform channel estimation based on pilot symbols received on multiple sets of subbands (instead of each set of subbands) in order to obtain a longer impulse response estimate that can capture the excess portion, as described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/821,7060, entitled “Pilot Transmission and Channel Estimation for an OFDM System With Excess Delay Spread,” filed xxx.
The techniques described herein may also be used by a receiver to achieve time-synchronization, which entails determining the time of arrival of a signal at the receiver. The receiver typically does not know a priori the arrival time of the signal because a transmitter may transmit at an arbitrary time instant and the wireless channel may introduce an unknown delay. The resolution to which the arrival time of the signal can be determined is limited by the bandwidth of the channel observations. Thus, only a coarse arrival time may be estimated based on the pilot received on any one set of M subbands, if M is much less than N. The techniques described herein can provide a more accurate arrival time of the signal transmitted via the wireless channel (as described above, with L=1). Accurate information on the time at which the signal is received is important since much of the receiver processing (e.g., demodulation and decoding) is typically performed based on this information.
At base station 550, an antenna 552 receives the reverse link signal and provides a received signal to a receiver unit (RCVR) 554. Receiver unit 554 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and frequency downconverts) the received signal, digitizes the conditioned signal, and provides received chips to an OFDM demodulator 556.
Channel estimator 568 obtains the received pilot symbols and performs channel estimation. Within channel estimator 568, a pilot detector 622 removes the modulation on the received pilot symbols to obtain a frequency response estimate for the reverse link for terminal 500. A spectral estimator 624 performs spectral estimation to obtain one or more frequency components of the frequency response estimate. Spectral estimator 624 may perform process 300 in
A timing loop 628 receives a signal arrival time for terminal 550 from spectral estimator 624 and performs time-synchronization. For example, timing loop 628 may generate a timing control used to adjust the timing of the transmission sent by terminal 500 so that the transmission is properly time-aligned at base station 550. Time synchronization is important for a multiple-access system to ensure transmissions from multiple terminals do not or minimally interfere with one another at the base station. Alternatively or additionally, timing loop 628 may generate a control signal use to adjust the timing of OFDM demodulator 556. Timing loop 628 (which may implement, e.g., a single-order loop) may detect whether the transmission from terminal 500 is early or late with respect to a reference time and may generate an advance/retard control used to direct terminal 500 to advance or delay its timing so that its transmission arrives at the reference time at base station 550.
Referring back to
On the forward link, a TX data processor 582 processes traffic and control data and provides data symbols. An OFDM modulator 584 receives and multiplexes the data symbols with pilot symbols, performs OFDM modulation, and provides a stream of OFDM symbols. The same or different transmission schemes may be used for the forward and reverse links. For example, the transmission scheme shown in
At terminal 500, the forward link signal from base station 550 is received by antenna 524 and processed by a receiver unit 542 to obtain received chips. An OFDM demodulator 544 then processes the received chips and provides received pilot symbols to a channel estimator 528 and detected data symbols to an RX data processor 546. Channel estimator 528 performs channel estimation for the forward link, e.g., using a spectral estimation technique such as the one shown in
Processors 530 and 570 direct the operation at terminal 500 and base station 550, respectively. Memory units 532 and 572 store program codes and data used by processors 530 and 570, respectively. Processors 530 and 570 may also implement channel estimators 528 and 568, respectively, and may perform channel estimation for the forward and reverse links, respectively.
The channel estimation techniques described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof. For a hardware implementation, the processing units used to perform channel estimation may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
For a software implementation, the channel estimation techniques may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in a memory unit (e.g., memory unit 532 or 572 in
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/540,088 entitled “TIME-SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL SOUNDING USING SPECTRAL ESTIMATION” filed Jan. 28, 2004, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5440590 | Birchler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
6298035 | Heiskala | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6493380 | Wu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
20030043887 | Hudson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030231725 | Scarpa | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236080 | Kadous et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040228267 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050135509 | Mantravadi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05-75568 | Mar 1993 | JP |
10-031065 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11-215543 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-237475 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-168950 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-196540 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-244371 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-286822 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000-341239 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2002-168936 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2005064870 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050163257 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60540088 | Jan 2004 | US |