None.
None.
None.
The disclosure relates to data reception techniques and transmission techniques.
More particularly, the disclosure relates to channel estimation techniques in OFDM transmission systems. Such systems comprise some base station and some mobile station. More particularly, the disclosure relates to a method and to a device for estimating a received signal in a wireless receiver.
In recent years, with the appearance of “turbo principle”, iterative receivers are becoming more and more popular and promising because of their excellent performances. Different mechanisms have been proposed and studied, for example, iterative detection, iterative multi-input multi-output (MIMO) equalization, etc.
However, these iterative mechanisms are seriously affected by channel estimator. For example, it has been shown that an iterative MIMO equalizer is more sensitive to channel estimation, and the traditional non-iterative channel estimators cannot provide sufficiently accurate channel estimates.
This necessitates more accurate channel estimates in order to improve system performances. Recently, iterative channel estimation is being considered to improve the accuracy of channel estimation, which uses the “soft” information of data to improve channel estimation performance. This type of channel estimation algorithms is particularly helpful for systems which have fewer and/or lower powered pilot symbols. For example, in Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems, at most two (2) OFDM symbols carry pilots in a given resource block and this decreases to one (1) OFDM symbol for MIMO transmission. A resource block (RB) is the minimum allocation unit over seven (7) OFDM symbols and twelve (12) subcarriers.
With this sparse pilot arrangement, the iterative channel estimation can be a good candidate to improve channel estimates. Moreover, for future standards, one of the key features is to build more power efficient transmission systems and, in this manner, decreasing the power of pilots is one of the possible ways to improve the power consumption efficiency. In such systems, the channel estimation algorithms used in current systems will have less accuracy and more robust algorithms will be needed.
Some iterative channel estimators have already been proposed for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems by using the extrinsic information from decoder. Among these iterative algorithms, the expectation maximization (EM) based channel estimation is taking attention because of its attractive performance. The EM algorithm is an iterative method to find the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimates of parameters in the presence of unobserved data. The idea behind the algorithm is to augment the observed data with latent data, which can be either missing data or parameter values, so that the likelihood function conditioned on the data and the latent data has a form that is easy to manipulate.
In others words, instead of computing the maximum-likelihood (ML) channel estimate from the observations only, the EM algorithm makes use of the so-called complete data κ, which are not observed directly but only through incomplete data.
The EM algorithm performs a two-step procedure: the “E-step” and the “M-step”. In the case of an estimation of a channel, these two steps have the following form:
1) E-step: compute the auxiliary function:
Q(h|ĥ(i)))=Σκ└log p(κ|h)|Y, ĥ(i)┘; (1)
2) M-step: update the parameters:
where h stands for the parameters to be estimated; ĥ(i) represents the estimated parameters in the ith iteration; Y stands for the observed data and κ is the so-called “complete data”, which contains observed data and some missed data. Likelihood increases along EM iterations.
In previous works, the EM channel estimation has been proposed for uncoded and coded OFDM systems with the assumption that pilots exist in every OFDM symbol. However, in practical specifications such as 3GPP LTE, IEEE 802.16m and LTE-Advanced, pilot symbols are present on certain OFDM symbols only.
Furthermore, even though the EM channel estimation method provides good performances and convergence property, it has a non negligible complexity because of a matrix inversion. When it is fully performed in one LTE sub-frame, the complexity of channel estimation and the latency are raised.
In a practical system like LTE, the traditional EM channel estimation method has another problem: it always considers the whole bandwidth, which is not the case in practical systems. Furthermore, in a practical system, “null” (guard) subcarriers are inserted at both sides of the bandwidth.
These “null” subcarriers make the traditional EM algorithm diverge, which is a substantial problem and leads to an inefficiency of the method.
Thus, it is important to propose an EM algorithm for practical systems and to make it converge even in the presence of “null” subcarriers. There is furthermore a need for proposing an EM channel estimation method in which the complexity of the calculation is reduced in order to shorten latency time.
An aspect of the disclosure relates to a channel estimating method of a signal transmitted in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system, wherein an OFDM symbol of said signal has at least one null subcarrier set in its defined bandwidth.
According to an aspect of the disclosure, the method comprises the following steps:
Thus an aspect of the disclosure allows improving the channel estimating and reducing the calculations for obtaining said channel estimation. Indeed, the truncated singular value decomposition of the partial FFT matrix eases the calculation and eliminates the need to proceed to a matrix inversion.
According to a specific embodiment, said method comprises at least one iteration of the following step:
According to an aspect of the disclosure, said improving step comprises:
Thus, unlike traditional methods, the use of a truncated matrix ensures that all the singular values of the matrix to be inverted are greater than a threshold and consequently, that the matrix itself, in the case of this application, becomes invertible.
According to a specific embodiment, said step of calculating channel estimates by applying said matrices US, ΣS and VS in an expectation maximization algorithm corresponds to the calculation of ĤTSVP-EM(i+1) as:
Ĥ
TSVP-EM
(i+1)=ΩL
where (•)H stands for transpose-conjugate and (•)* stands for complex conjugate, Y stands for a received signal vector, {tilde over (X)}(i) represents a soft symbol vector which contain a posteriori probabilities (APPs) of a data vector X at the ith iteration and
According to an embodiment, said step for obtaining at least one initial channel estimate comprises:
Another embodiment relates to a channel estimating apparatus of a signal transmitted in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system, wherein an OFDM symbol of said signal has at least one null subcarrier set in its defined bandwidth,
According to an aspect of the disclosure said channel estimating apparatus comprises means for:
Another embodiment relates to a detector used in conjunction with a channel estimating apparatus as previously described, said detector providing likelihoods and log likelihoods rations in function of soft values obtained from an equalizer and being based on a mean square error estimation. According to an aspect of the disclosure, said detector is characterized in that a constant channel estimation mean square error value is employed in said detector:
where μi and σEQU2, represent mean value and variance obtained from said equalizer and σEQU2 is the constant mean square error value MSETSVD-EM in:
where Aii represents the ith diagonal entry of an L×L matrix VSVSH and hi is the ith tap in an estimated channel; E{•} stands for the expectation and L is the delay spread of channel, VS being a result of a truncated singular value decomposition of ΩL
An embodiment also relates to a computer program product downloadable from a communications network and/or stored in a computer-readable carrier and/or executable by a microprocessor. According to an embodiment, such a program comprises program code instructions for the implementation of the steps of the channel estimation method as previously described in various embodiments.
The proposed method is described in the following by way of examples in connection with the accompanying FIGURE without limiting the scope of the protection as defined by the claim, in which
The base idea of an aspect of the disclosure is to make the EM channel estimation method more usable in practical specifications. Thus, in order to make the EM channel estimation method more practical, some simplified EM channel estimation method may be considered by keeping almost the same performance.
Such a simplified EM channel estimation method, as proposed by the inventors, ensures that the “null” subcarriers which are inserted at both sides of the bandwidth of an OFDM symbol will not lead to a divergence of the EM channel estimation method. This simplified EM channel estimation method also ensures that the complexity of channel estimation is reduced.
For realizing this simplification, the inventors propose a method for arbitrary eliminating the matrix inversion of the traditional EM channel estimation method. Such an elimination leads to a reduction of the number of calculation made and consequently to shorten latency time.
One possible method for lowering the complexity of the calculation is to introduce, in the estimation method, a threshold, which is used to decide whether a singular value of a given matrix should be considered as null or not. This method will be described herein after.
In the following description a so-called truncated singular value decomposition EM (TSVD-EM) channel estimation algorithm working with a novel detector is proposed.
This method integrates the truncated SVD and EM algorithm to deal with “null” subcarriers.
One further analyzes the mean square error (MSE) property of the proposed algorithm. Based on the MSE analysis, a new detector is proposed. This detector works together with the proposed iterative channel estimation algorithm and guarantees system performances converge at high signal-to-noise ration (SNR). Herein after, it is referred to LTE systems as an example. However, it is worth mentioning that the principles of the disclosure can be generalized to any OFDMA-based communication system, for example.
In other words, an aspect of the disclosure proposes an EM based channel estimation algorithm (in LTE systems), where some “null” subcarriers exist and special pilot arrangement is considered with limited pilot symbols.
In a general implementation, described in relation with
In other words, the principle of an aspect of the disclosure is to use the properties of the EM algorithm for channel estimation without having the drawbacks of the non convergence of the algorithm in standard conditions. These drawbacks are eliminated by truncating the singular value decomposition which is made during the estimation of the channel with the conventional EM algorithm. By truncating, an aspect of the disclosure means eliminating some rows of the matrices which results from the decomposition for facilitating the calculations. This elimination of some rows of the matrices is done in function of a threshold value (named T) which facilitates the process of deciding whether a current singular value of the singular matrix has to be placed to 0 or not.
In this disclosure, the terms “soft information” means some “probabilities”.
An aspect of the disclosure has the following advantages:
As already told, it is known that EM based algorithms provide excellent performances in OFDM systems. However, they always consider all subcarriers to implement iterative channel estimation.
The estimation procedure for EM based channel estimation can be formulized as:
Ĥ
EM
(i+1)=ΩL(ΩLHRN×N(i)ΩL)−1ΩLH diag({tilde over (X)}(i)*)Y (3)
where (•)H stands for transpose-conjugate and (•)* stands for complex conjugate, Y stands for the received signal vector, ΩL is a matrix of the first L (L representing the delay spread of channel, only the first L columns of the FFT matrix are needed because, there is only L taps in the time domain.) columns of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) matrix Ω whose mnth (m,n=1,2, . . . , N) element is given by
{tilde over (X)}(i) represents soft symbol vector which contain the a posteriori probabilities (APPs) of the data vector X at the ith iteration, ĤEM(i+1) is the estimated channel vector at the (i+1)th iteration, and
RN×N(i) contains the soft information of the previous (i)th, obtained from the decoder.
In equation (3), all subcarriers are considered in the EM channel estimation. One can have small condition numbers, defined by the ratio between the greatest and the smallest singular values (“the maximum-to-minimum-singular-value ratio”, MMSVR), which make the EM channel estimation perform well.
However, in practical systems, some “null” subcarriers always exist as a “guard band” and equation (3) thus becomes:
Ĥ
EM
(i+1)=ΩL
where NDP represents the number of modulated subcarriers and ΩL
With these “null” subcarriers (and the resulting equation (5)), the matrix invertibility in traditional EM algorithm cannot be guaranteed anymore. Consequently, the EM algorithm will not converge, because the matrix can not be inverted. This problem arises from the “condition number” of the new partial FFT matrix ΩL
For the record, a matrix A is told to be invertible if AB=I for some matrix B and BA=I for the same matrix B. The condition number of a matrix Ω is the ratio between the maximum singular value and the minimum singular value. For determining the maximum singular value and the minimum singular value, a singular value decomposition of the matrix Ω is needed. Suppose Ω is an m×n matrix. Then there exists a factorization, called a singular-value decomposition, of the form Ω=UΣVH, where U is an m×m unitary matrix, the matrix Σ is an m×n diagonal matrix with nonnegative real numbers on the diagonal, and VH, an n×n unitary matrix, denotes the conjugate transpose of V. Such a factorization is called the singular-value decomposition of Ω and the singular values correspond to the diagonal values of the matrix Σ, in which the maximum singular value and the minimum singular value can be found.
The inventors have note that to make the EM algorithm converge with “null” subcarriers, the matrix to be inverted should have a good condition number, which is not possible as such. In order to solve this problem, the inventors propose to use a “truncated singular value decomposition” (TSVD) in the EM algorithm (namely, TSVD-EM) instead of the conventional singular-value decomposition. It works as follows:
ΩL
ΩL
Ĥ
TSVP-EM
(i+1)=ΩL
According to an aspect of the disclosure, the equation (8) is obtained through the traditional EM with SVD. In the traditional EM, the FFT matrix can be decomposed as:
ΩL=UΣVH.
With this decomposition, the matrix inverse of the traditional EM in equation (3) can be written as
(ΩLHRN×N(i)ΩL)−1=(VΣHUHRN×N(i)UΣVH)−1=VΣ−1UHRN×N(i)−1U(ΣT)−1VH.
Substituting it into equation (3), leads to:
Ĥ
TSVP-EM
(i+1)=ΩLVΣ−1UH(RN×N(i))−1U(ΣT)−1VHVΣHUH diag({tilde over (X)}(i)*)Y.
Considering the auto-correlated columns of U and V, we have UHU=I and VHV=I. Then, the traditional EM can be written as
Ĥ
TSVP-EM
(i+1)=ΩLV(ΣT)−1UH(RN×N(i))−1 diag({tilde over (X)}(i)*)Y.
For TSVD-EM, after the truncation, the partial FFT matrix can be approximated as
ΩL
According to an aspect of the disclosure, using the result of SVD-EM, the previous approximation is directly used and leads to the equation (8) which is part of the subject matter conceived by the inventors of the present application.
The iterative procedure should be terminated as soon as the difference between ĤTSVD-EM(i+1) and ĤTSVD-EM(i) is sufficiently small, since at this point, ĤTSVD-EM(i) has presumably converged to the estimate one is seeking.
With traditional EM in OFDM systems, one always has RN×N(i) in the matrix inversion.
Since the matrix RN×N(i) contains soft information from decoder, it has to be calculated in each iteration and so does the matrix inversion. The complexity of this matrix inversion is O(L3) After matrix inversion, in order to get all channel estimates, the computations are O(N2). Thus, the complexity is O(L3)+O(N2). For a channel with long delay spread, which is the case in practical channel models, this complexity is very high.
According to an aspect of the disclosure, since in equation (8), ΣS and RN
As it is well-known, initial channel estimates are important for the EM channel estimation algorithm. For TSVD-EM, different algorithms can be used to obtain initial channel estimates ĤTSVD-EM(0) for example, the simple least square (LS) algorithm. Furthermore, in practical systems, pilots (reference symbols) exist only in certain OFDM symbols according to a special arrangement.
In order to obtain all channel estimates with a low complexity in practical systems, the TSVD-EM may be performed only over the OFDM symbols where reference symbols exist. Then, based on the channel estimates from TSVD-EM, an interpolation in time domain can be performed to obtain channel estimates over the other OFDM symbols where reference symbols do not exist.
4. Detector Jointly Working with TSVD-EM Estimator
From theoretical analysis, the mean square error (MSE) of the TSVD-EM is a constant value at high signal to noise ratio (SNR),
where Aii represents the ith diagonal entry of the L×L matrix VS VSH and hi is the ith tap in channel; E{•} stands for the expectation and L is the delay spread of channel. From equation (9), it can be seen that the MSE of the TSVD-EM only depends on the power profile of channel and the threshold T of TSVD.
In iterative receiver, channel estimates (the initial one or the ones of the previous iteration) are iteratively fed to equalizer to generate soft values of transmitted symbols. After equalizer, the soft values are sent to detector to generate likelihoods, which will be used to calculate the a posteriori probabilities (APP), and log likelihood ration (LLR) values, which will be sent to channel decoder. More precisely, detector determines, for each bit of the transmitted transmit vector, a measure for the probability (the so-called log-likelihood ratio) that the transmitted bit was a “1” (or “0”), or does so for a collection of bits. The soft decision values provided by the soft decision detector can be quantized to reduce the result to hard decisions, or some other processing can be done to collectively reduce the result to hard decisions, such as using a trellis decoder.
Since traditional detectors only consider variance from equalizer, the constant MSE value of TSVE-EM can impact detection performance and the convergence of the algorithm considerably. Especially at high SNR, this constant MSE will make system performances diverge.
In order to improve detection performance, the inventors propose to consider this constant MSE value directly in detector:
where μi and σEQU2 represent mean value and variance from equalizer and σCHE2 is the constant MSE in equation (10) from TSVD-EM channel estimator.
Thus, the inventors propose a TSVD-EM based channel estimation algorithm in OFDM systems (for example LTE systems) where some “null” subcarriers exist and special pilot arrangement is considered with limited number of pilot symbols. By considering the constant MSE of the proposed channel estimator at high SNR, a novel detector is also proposed to work with the TSVD-EM estimator. The proposed channel estimator has much lower complexity compared to traditional EM channel estimator and shows good convergence behavior even with “null” subcarriers.
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to one or more examples, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the scope of the disclosure and/or the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10187691.0 | Oct 2010 | EP | regional |