Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed in general to field of information processing. In one aspect, the present invention relates to a system and method for reducing channel quality indicator (CQI) feedback in communication systems.
Description of the Related Art
Wireless communication systems transmit and receive signals within a designated electromagnetic frequency spectrum, but the capacity of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum is limited. As the demand for wireless communication systems continues to expand, there are increasing challenges to improve spectrum usage efficiency. To improve the communication capacity of the systems while reducing the sensitivity of the systems to noise and interference and limiting the power of the transmissions, a number of wireless communication techniques have been proposed.
In broadband communication systems which use multi-carrier modulation systems such as ODFM/OFDMA, channel quality indicators (CQI) such as “carrier to interference plus noise” ratio (CINR) are fed back from the receiver to the transmitter, in order to select the appropriate transmission profile. For instance, adapting the modulation and coding rates, and scheduling multiple users based on CQI improves data rates and link reliability. This technology has been, or will be, adopted in many current and future standards such as IEEE 802.16, 3GPP LTE, etc.
Feeding back the CQI for multi-carrier systems such as OFDMA can potentially use up the usually small bandwidth allocated to the feedback control channel due to the multiplicity of the CQI coefficients. Accordingly, there is a need for a system and method for reducing the CQI feedback overhead is these systems. Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional processes and technologies will become apparent to one of skill in the art after reviewing the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings and detailed description which follow.
The present invention may be understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages obtained, when the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements illustrated in the drawings have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements are exaggerated relative to other elements for purposes of promoting and improving clarity and understanding. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals have been repeated among the drawings to represent corresponding or analogous elements.
A system and methodology are disclosed for exploiting channel correlation in time and/or frequency to reduce CQI feedback in wireless communication systems. The embodiments of the invention disclosed herein can be implemented in single antenna communication systems or in communication systems wherein the transmitter and/or the receiver comprise multiple antennas. By compressing CQI feedback at the receiver to reduce redundancy in CQI feedback information that results from channel correlation, the average feedback rate is reduced. In some embodiments, redundancy in time may be removed from the CQI feedback information by monitoring variations of the CQI information in time at the receiver so that CQI information for a given CQI reporting instance is communicated to the transmitter only if it differs from the CQI information for the previous CQI reporting instance. Otherwise, no feedback is performed. Compression of the CQI feedback information in time and frequency exploits the temporal correlation of the transmission channel wherein, statistically, the characteristics of the transmission channel change slowly over time in most cases of interest. This compression technique may also be applied to broadband communication systems by dividing a broadband channel into a plurality of clusters (where each cluster consists of one or more sub-carriers in a given frequency range) and then sending back CQI information only for those clusters where there is a change in CQI information, along with bit indices of the corresponding clusters to indicate cluster numbers. Additional compression may be obtained by limiting the number clusters for which temporally compressed CQI information is fed back, such as by ranking the candidate clusters according to a given predetermined or dynamic selection criterion and sending back the temporally compressed CQI information only for a predetermined number of the top-ranked clusters, where the predetermined number may be fixed or may be adjusted dynamically for different feedback intervals. In one embodiment, the given selection criterion for ranking the candidate cluster may be the absolute values such that the candidate clusters are ranked from highest CQI value to lowest CQI value, so that the top ranked candidate clusters correspond to the ones have highest CQI values. In another embodiment, the candidate clusters are ranked according to the changes in their CQI values from one reporting period to the next reporting period, so that the top ranked candidate clusters correspond to those clusters whose CQI values have changed the most. In some embodiments, CQI feedback is compressed by performing a multiple-input, multiple-output transform, such as the discrete cosine transform (DCT), on the CQI data, thereby generating a plurality of transform coefficients. In these embodiments, the transform coefficients are evaluated during a reporting instance, ‘n’, by comparing these coefficients to corresponding coefficients in a reporting instance, ‘n−1’. In embodiments of the invention, the compressed feedback comprises all transform coefficients that have changed during a particular interval. In another embodiment, the feedback information comprises only the changed coefficients that meet a predetermined metric. This predetermined metric in one embodiment can be a threshold, where the threshold may be different for each DCT coefficient. In other embodiments, the candidate DCT coefficients can be selected in accordance with a dynamic metric which, in some embodiments, can be a dynamic threshold, In each of the embodiments described herein, the compressed CQI feedback information is communicated to the transmitter through the feedback control channel where it is processed to regenerate the original CQI state information and is used for scheduling and automatic modulation control (AMC). As used herein, CQI information is interpreted to include CQI state information comprising the actual CQI values, index information that can be used to represent CQI values, and/or CQI information obtained by performing a transform of CQI values, such as the multiple-input, multiple output transforms described hereinbelow.
Various illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying figures. While various details are set forth in the following description, it will be appreciated that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details, and that numerous implementation-specific decisions may be made to the invention described herein to achieve the device designer's specific goals, such as compliance with process technology or design-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. While such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, it would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. For example, selected aspects are shown in block diagram form, rather than in detail, in order to avoid limiting or obscuring the present invention. In addition, some portions of the detailed descriptions provided herein are presented in terms of algorithms or operations on data within a computer memory. Such descriptions and representations are used by those skilled in the art to describe and convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art.
The transmitter 202 includes a single antenna or an array or antennas 227 for communicating with the receivers 206.1-m. The receivers 206.1-m, may comprise a single antenna or an array of antennas 209.i for communicating with the transmitter 202. In operation, a data signal si presented at the transmitter 202 for transmission to the receiver 206.i is transformed by the signal processor 221.i into a transmission signal represented by the vector xi. The signals transmitted from the transmit antenna 227 propagate through a matrix channel Hi and are received by the receive antennas 209.i where they are represented by the vector yi. For a channel from the transmitter 202 to the ith receiver 206.i, the channel is denoted by Hi, iε{1, 2, . . . , m}. The channel matrix Hi may be represented as an ki×N matrix of complex entries representing the complex coefficients of the transmission channel between each transmit-receive antenna pair, where N represents the number of antennas of the transmitter 202 and ki represents the number of antennas of the ith receiver 206.i. At the receiver 206.i, the signal processing unit 205.i processes the yi signals received on the k antennas to obtain a data signal, zi, which is an estimate of the transmitted data si. The processing of the received yi signals may include combining the yi signals with appropriate combining vector information retrieved from the codebook 207.i.
The channel matrix Hi—which specifies the transmission channel between a transmitter and an ith receiver—in the channel estimation signal processing unit 205.i. For example, in a MIMO implementation, each receiver 206.1-m determines its MIMO channel matrix Hi by using pilot estimation or sounding techniques to determine or estimate the coefficients of the channel matrix Hi. Each receiver 206.i uses the estimated MIMO channel matrix or other channel-related information (which can be channel coefficients or channel statistics or their functions, such as a precoder, a beamforming vector or a modulation order) to generate CQI information that is to be used to configure/adapt the signals transmitted by the transmitter.
Rather than feeding back the full CQI representation, the receiver 206.i may use a codebook 207.i to compress or quantize the transmission profile (e.g., CQI information) that is generated from the detected channel information and that can be used by the transmitter in controlling signal transmission to the receiver. The CQI estimator 203.i generates a quantization/codebook index by accessing the receiver codebook 207.i which stores an indexed set of possible transmission profiles and/or channel matrices along with associated CQI information so that the estimated channel matrix information 204.i generated by the signal processing unit 205.i can be used by the CQI estimator 203.i to retrieve a codebook index from the codebook 207.i. The output of the CQI estimator 203.i is provided to a CQI transition detector 212.i that is operable to detect changes in the CQI information. If the CQI transition detector 212.i detects a change in the CQI information of any cluster, the new CQI information is communicated to the transition subset selector 214.i for transmission to the transmitter 202 via the feedback channel 215, in accordance with selection metrics described in greater detail below.
A selected subset of the CQI information, which may be in the form of indexed information, is transmitted via the feedback channel 215 and is stored in memory 220 of the transmitter 202. A memory controller 222 is operable to control the updating of the indexed CQI information in the memory 220 and to control the transfer of the indexed CQI information to the decoder 224. The decoder 224 is operable to process the indexed CQI information and to retrieve information from the codebook 226 to provide CQI information that can be used by scheduling module 225 and AMC selection module 228 to generate scheduling or AMC information, respectively, for a particular receiver 206.i.
The CQI information communicated to the transmitter 202 via the feedback channel 215 can be provided in a plurality of alternative formats. In one embodiment of the invention, the feedback subset comprises all CQIs that have changed during a particular CQI reporting instance. In this embodiment, the feedback subset may be limited to changed CQI information only, or it may include changed CQI information and a predetermined quantity of unchanged CQI information. In another embodiment, the feedback information transmitted to the transmitter 202 comprises a subset of only the changed CQIs that meet a predetermined selection criterion. In one embodiment, clusters corresponding to the changed CQI are ranked from highest CQI value to lowest CQI value, so that the top ranked ‘F’ candidate clusters (where ‘F’ is some integer number) corresponding to the ones have highest CQI values are chosen to be fed back. In another embodiment, the candidate clusters are ranked according to the changes in their CQI values from one reporting instance to the next reporting instance, so that the top ranked candidate clusters corresponding to those clusters whose CQI values have changed the most are fed back. In yet another embodiment, the candidate CQIs are selected in accordance with a dynamic selection criterion. In one embodiment, the dynamic selection criterion is such that the number ‘F’, of top ranked clusters whose CQI value are fed back, itself changes from one reporting instance to another.
The CQI feedback compression techniques described above may be extended and applied to a variety of communication systems, including but not limited to TDD systems, FDD systems, OFDM systems and broadband systems. For example,
A single processor or controller could be used to detect channel transitions for all the clusters or for a subset of the clusters. Alternatively, and as illustrated in
Notwithstanding the efficiency benefits of using temporal feedback compression, a significant amount of feedback overhead may be consumed when feeding back CQI information for a broadband channel. Accordingly, a selected embodiment of the present invention further reduces the feedback overhead by sending temporally compressed feedback for only a subset of the clusters that have changed. In effect, an upper bound is placed on the number of clusters for which CQI feedback is allowed. For example, rather than sending feedback for all the clusters that have changed, feedback is sent only for a number F (where 1≦F<N) of clusters from the clusters that have changed. Again, the feedback will consist of the changed CQI indices and log 2(N) bits indicating which cluster has changed. To select which of the clusters having changed CQIs will provide feedback, the clusters can be ranked or sorted or otherwise chosen with any desired technique. For example, the candidate clusters may be ranked by their corresponding channel quality indicator, such as a CINR (Carrier-to-Interference plus Noise Ratio) or SINR (Signal-to-Interference plus Noise Ratio) value. Once the candidate clusters are ranked, F of the top-ranked candidate clusters are chosen for feedback. As will be appreciated, the fixed number F may be fixed across all feedback intervals, or may be variable for each feedback interval. When F is fixed, then the size of feedback is fixed, and when F is variable, the size of feedback is also variable. When F is fixed, and if less than F clusters, say C clusters, have changed CQI indices, then it is to be understood that zeros are sent in place of the F-C clusters or alternate information can sent in place of the F-C clusters.
The DCT coefficient information, which may be in the form of indexed information, is transmitted via the feedback channel 215 and is received by the transmitter 202 and stored in memory 220. A memory controller 222 is operable to control the updating of the indexed DCT coefficients in the memory 220 and to control the transfer of the indexed DCT coefficients to the inverse DCT transform module 418. The inverse DCT module 418 then performs an inverse DCT transform on the updated DCT coefficients for each cluster to regenerate CQI index information for each cluster. The CQI index information is provided to a decoder 224 that is operable to retrieve information from the codebook 226 for CQI information for a particular receiver 206.i. The CQI information then used by the transmitter 202 for scheduling and AMC operations. The DCT coefficient information communicated to the transmitter 202 via the feedback channel 215 can be provided in a plurality of alternative formats. In one embodiment of the invention, the feedback comprises all DCT coefficients that have changed during a particular interval. In another embodiment, the feedback information transmitted to the transmitter 202 comprises only the changed DCT coefficients that meet a predetermined metric. This predetermined metric in one embodiment can be a threshold, i.e. a given DCT coefficient is chosen to be fed back if the change in its value from one reporting instance to another exceeds a certain predetermined threshold, where the threshold may be different for each DCT coefficient. In yet another embodiment, the candidate DCT coefficients are selected in accordance with a dynamic metric; this dynamic metric in one embodiment can be a dynamic threshold, i.e. a given DCT coefficient is chosen to be fed back if the change in its value from one reporting instance to another exceeds a certain threshold, where the threshold may be different for each DCT coefficient and may change from one reporting instance to another.
As will be understood by those of skill in the art, the discrete cosine transform is a multiple-input, multiple-output transform. The discrete cosine transform of CQI information for ‘N’ clusters will generate ‘N’ DCT coefficients. Furthermore, those of skill in the art will recognize that the embodiments of the invention described herein can be implemented using other multiple-input, multiple output transforms to process the CQI information for the plurality of clusters. For example, embodiments of the present invention can be implemented using a fast-Fourier transform.
As illustrated in
By now it should be appreciated that there has been provided a method and system for feeding back CQI by compressing the CQI feedback to reduce the average rate of CQI feedback. As described, the receiver estimates the channel state information for a transmission channel from a transmitting device by receiving one or more signals at the first receiving device. Using the channel state information, the receiver generates CQI information for the transmission channel by identifying a first CQI profile from a first codebook at the first receiving device that corresponds to the channel state information. For example, the CQI information may be a quantized CQI parameter, such as an index value from the first codebook that is associated with the first CQI profile that corresponds to the channel state information corresponding to the first CQI profile. In another example, a plurality of CQI profiles for a corresponding plurality of sub-carrier clusters (each having one or more sub-carriers) in a broadband channel may be identified and quantized into CQI indices. The CQI information is then compressed to remove redundancy from the CQI information, thereby generating compressed CQI information. A variety of compression techniques may be used. For example, the CQI information may be temporally compressed by sending CQI information for a predetermined CQI reporting instance over a feedback channel to the transmitting device only if a difference is detected between the CQI information for the predetermined CQI reporting instance and CQI information for a previous CQI reporting instance. Where there are a plurality of CQI profiles for a plurality of sub-carrier clusters, the plurality of CQI profiles may be compressed to remove temporal redundancy from the plurality of CQI profiles, thereby generating temporally compressed CQI information for each sub-carrier cluster. The temporally compressed CQI information may be sent over a feedback channel for only a first predetermined number F of the sub-carrier clusters whose CQI information has changed, where the predetermined number is either fixed or variable across a plurality of feedback interval. If the actual number C of sub-carrier clusters whose CQI information has changed is less than the first predetermined number F, then alternate information may be sent along with the temporally compressed CQI information, such that the alternate information is sent in place of the F-C sub-carrier clusters. However compressed, the compressed CQI information is fed back to the transmitting device where it is used to access a second codebook at the transmitting device to retrieve a second CQI profile that matches the first CQI profile and that is used to control transmission over the transmission channel from the transmitting device to the first receiving device.
The methods and systems for designing and using compressed CQI feedback in a limited feedback system as shown and described herein may be implemented in hardware or in software stored on a computer-readable medium and executed as a computer program on a general purpose or special purpose computer to perform certain tasks. For a hardware implementation, the elements used to perform various signal processing steps at the transmitter and/or at the receiver may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof. In addition or in the alternative, a software implementation may be used, whereby some or all of the signal processing steps at each of the transmitter and receiver may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. It will be appreciated that the separation of functionality into modules is for illustrative purposes, and alternative embodiments may merge the functionality of multiple software modules into a single module or may impose an alternate decomposition of functionality of modules. In any software implementation, the software code may be executed by a processor or controller, with the code and any underlying or processed data being stored in any machine-readable or computer-readable storage medium, such as an on-board or external memory unit.
Although the described exemplary embodiments disclosed herein are directed to various communications systems and methods for using same, the present invention is not necessarily limited to the example embodiments illustrate herein. For example, various embodiments of a communication system disclosed herein may be implemented in connection with various proprietary or wireless communication standards, such as IEEE 802.16e, 3GPP-LTE, DVB and other systems. Thus, the particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only and should not be taken as limitations upon the present invention, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Accordingly, the foregoing description is not intended to limit the invention to the particular form set forth, but on the contrary, is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims so that those skilled in the art should understand that they can make various changes, substitutions and alterations without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims. As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5909649 | Saunders | Jun 1999 | A |
6473467 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6766167 | Tung et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6968092 | Winger | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7110463 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139328 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151809 | Ketchum et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7164649 | Walton et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7499701 | Salonaho et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505527 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7599698 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602837 | Kotecha et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607832 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7724697 | Dalsgaard et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7751368 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778599 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809074 | Kotecha et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7907958 | Sampath et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7957360 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961672 | Varadarajan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8018855 | Englund et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8020075 | Kotecha | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036131 | Roh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8121045 | Cai et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8144797 | Mujtaba et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8284731 | Shitara et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315194 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8457235 | Ko et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498270 | Iwamura et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8531958 | Sivanesan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8599816 | Kazmi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8761039 | Ji et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8867448 | Ji et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879475 | Ji et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020160798 | Shoji et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040066761 | Giannakis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076224 | Onggosanusi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108944 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040228423 | Gueguen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050009476 | Wu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043031 | Cho et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050101259 | Tong et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117660 | Vialle | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129137 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050201296 | Vannithamby | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213575 | Shin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050276317 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023650 | Dominique et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045041 | Yuuki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072677 | Kwak et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092054 | Li et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060093065 | Thomas et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098760 | Shen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111100 | Murata et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120478 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121946 | Walton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153227 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155534 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155798 | Ketchum et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165188 | Wunder et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209980 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060274712 | Malladi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279460 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005749 | Sampath | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026808 | Love et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066571 | Stockel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070967 | Yang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071147 | Sampath et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086540 | Chae et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098106 | Khojastepour et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099571 | Withers et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115796 | Jeong et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127608 | Scheim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147535 | Niu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189205 | Terry et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191066 | Khojastepour et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195974 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211813 | Talwar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217540 | Onggosanusi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223619 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232341 | Sakata | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249296 | Howard et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254597 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286304 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287468 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297528 | Feder et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013610 | Varadarajan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019457 | Waters | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043677 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045228 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056414 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069058 | Geng et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075058 | Mundarath et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076370 | Kotecha et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080448 | Rottinghaus | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080449 | Huang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080459 | Kotecha et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084829 | Visuri | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102846 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118008 | Kotecha | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159425 | Khojastepour et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165698 | Dalsgaard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165875 | Mundarath et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187062 | Pan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207135 | Varadarajan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212701 | Pan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080212702 | Pan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080227495 | Kotecha et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080268785 | McCoy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268863 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046652 | Shitara et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067374 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090190688 | Kotecha et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090207784 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090262854 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274220 | Yun et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279466 | Ji et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100002595 | Iwamura et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100118817 | Damnjanovic et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100183064 | Molnar et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202553 | Kotecha et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100278058 | Damnjanovic et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322351 | Tang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110077020 | Zangi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077040 | Nammi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103247 | Chen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110189997 | Tiwari et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217977 | Du et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222472 | Breit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243017 | Prasad et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110269462 | Sagfors et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280197 | Brueck et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110305161 | Ekpenyong et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120020230 | Chen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033722 | Varadarajan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044831 | Kazmi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120093000 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120147773 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120263088 | Terry et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130003788 | Marinier et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130107782 | Anas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121312 | Roman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130194990 | Banister et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1453262 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1931062 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2339883 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2494499 | Mar 2013 | GB |
2007-189349 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007037218 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2010118379 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2012112291 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
DJ Love et al., “Grassmannian Beamfonning on Correlated MIMO Channels,” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Nov. 3-Dec. 3, 2004, cited by other. |
A. Bourdoux et al., “Joint TX•RX Ootimisatiau for MIMO-SDMA Based on a Null-space Constraint,” 2002 JEEE 561h Vehicular Technology Conference, cited by other. |
DJ Love et al., “Grassmannian Beamfonning for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Wireless Systems,” IEEE, 2003, cited by other. |
AF Naguib et al., “Performance of Wireless CDMA with Mary Orthogonal Modulation and Cell Site Antenna Arrays”, IEEE, Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, No. 9, Dec. 1996, cited by other. |
L. Dong et al., “Optomistic Transmission Scheduling for Multiuser MIMO Systems,” JEEE, 2003, cited by other. |
H. Shin et al., “Closed-form Formulas for Ergodic Capacity of MIMO Rayleigh Fading Channels,” IEEE, 2003, cited by other. |
M Torlak et al., “Fast Estimation of Weight Vectors to Optimize Multi-Transmitter Broadcast Channel Capacity,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 1998, cited by other. |
V. Zaharov et al., “Smart Antenna Application for Satellite Communication Systems with Space Division Multiple Access,” Journal of Radio Electronics, N. 2, Feb. 5, 2001, printed Oct. 18, 2005, cited by other. |
M. Cooper et al., “Intelligent Antennas: Spatial Division Multiple Access,” 1996 Annual Review of Communications, cited by other. |
G.L. Foschini et al., “On Limits of Wireless Communication in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas”, Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 6, 1998, pp. 311-335, http:www.bell-labs.com/projectlblastiwpc-v6n3.pdf, cited by other. |
R. Monzingo et al, “Introduction to Adaptive Arrays”, Chapter 3, John Wiley & Sons, 1980, pp. 78-151, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,392, filed Oct. 20, 2005, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2008, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,392, filed Oct. 20, 2005, RCE IDS filed Dec. 16, 2008, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,392, filed Oct. 20, 2005, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 5, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,392, filed Oct. 20, 2005, RCE Amendment filed Apr 6, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,392, filed Oct. 20, 2005, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 4, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/419,701, filed Apr. 7, 2009, Preliminary Amendment mailed Apr. 7, 2009, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Scheme for MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA” R1—070608 (this is an update of R1-070223 and in the document title No. was R1.070223. The Examiner changed to 608), Jan. 2007, 3GPP TGS RAN WGI Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Overview and Way forward on MIMO Preceding in DL EUTRA” R1 -070220, Jan. 2006 JGPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Ilaly, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Efficient method for feedback reduction and feedback mechanism for precoded MIMO in EUTRA” R1 -070220, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Aspects of SU/MU Switching and MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA”, R1-070222, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN, VG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, Scheme for MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA R1-070223, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting #47 bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Philips, “Comparison between MU-MIMO Codebook-based Channel Reporting Techniques for LTE Downlink”, R1 064283, Oct. 2006, 3GPP RAN WG1 Meeting #46bis, Seoul, cited by other. |
Philips, “System-level simulation results for channel vector quantisation feedback for MU-MIMO,” R1-063028, Nov. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WGT Meeting #47, Riga, cited by other. |
Alcatel, “Link-level results for multiuser eigenmode transmission wilh limited feedback;” R1-0703111 3GG TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, Jan. 15-19, 2007, Tdoc R1 -070318, cited by other. |
Love, “Limited Feedback Precoding for Spatial Multiplexing Systems,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003, Globecom '03, IEEE vol. 4, Publication year 2003, pp. 1857-1861, cited by other. |
Love, “Limited Feedback Precoding for Spatial Multiplexing: Systems Using Linear Receivers,” Military Communications Conference, 2003, MILCOM 2003, IEEE vol. 1, Publication Year 2003, pp. 627-632, cited by other. |
Love, “Limited Feedback Unitary Precoding for Orthogonal Space-Time Block Codes,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Publication date Jan. 2005, vol. 53, Issue 1, pp. 64-73, cited by other. |
Castro et al., “Adaptive Vector Quantization for Precoding Using Blind Channel Prediction in Frequency Selective MIMO Mobile Channels”, cited by other. |
Mondal, “Frame theoretic quantization for limited feedback MIMO beamforming systems”, 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, Jun. 13-16, 2005, pp. 1065-1070, vol. 2, cited by other. |
Alcatel-Lucent, Philips, “Dedicated Reference Signals for MU-MIMO Preceding in E-UTRA Downlink”, TSG-RAN WG I #48, St. Louis, Missouri, Feb. 12-16, 2007, R1-071069, cited by other. |
Huang, “Multi-antenna Limited Feedback for Temporally-Correlated Channels: Feedback compression,” in PROC. JEEE Global Telecommunication Conference, Nov. 2006, cited by other. |
Philips, “Comparison of MU-MIMO Feedback Schemes with Multiple UW Receive Antennas,” 3GG TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, Jan. 15-19, 2007, Tdoc R1-070346, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,441, filed Jan. 25, 2005, Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,441, filed Jan. 25, 2005, Response filed Jun. 22, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,441, filed Jan. 25, 2005, Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,441, filed Jan. 25, 2005, Response filed Oct. 6, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,441, filed Jan. 25, 2005, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 19, 2010, cited by other. |
A. Bourdoux et al., “Joint TX•RX Optimisation for MIMO-SDMA Based on a Null-space Constraint,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, 2002, cited by other. |
K. Wong et al., “Performance Enhancement of Multiuser MIMO Wireless Communication Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,702, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Office Action mailed Oct. 28, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,702, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Response dated Jan. 28. 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,702, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Office Action dated May 11, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,702, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Response mailed Aug. 11, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,702, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/601,270, filed Aug. 31, 2012, Zhu Ji. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/993,330, filed Nov. 18, 2010, Sairamesh Nammi. |
Nortel, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #53bis R1-08xxx, Warsaw, Poland, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 2008, Agenda Item: 6.3, CQI/PMI reporting on PUSCH, Discussion and Decision (6 pages). |
Rohde & Schwarz, UMTS Long Term Evolution (LTE) Technology Introduction, Application Note 1 MA 111, Mar. 2007 (32 pages). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), Physical layer procedures (Release 8) (77 pages). |
Ericsson, “CQI Reporting with Regards to DRX Operation”, May 7-11, 2007, 2 pages. |
Nokia Corporation, Nokia Siemens Networks, Samsung, “CQI Reporting Configuration”, Aug. 18-22, 2008, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,568, filed Nov. 29, 2012, Zhu Ji. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/484,785, filed Sep. 12, 2014, Zhu Ji. |
Analysis on OCT based CQI Reporting Scheme, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #46-bis, RI-062954, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Oct. 9-13, 2006, cited by other. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for correlating PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/056579, dated Jul. 31, 2008, cited by other. |
Soo-Yong Jeon et al., “Channel Adaptive CQI Reporting Schemes for HSDPA Systems;communications Letter, IEEE”, vol. 10, Issue 6, Jul. 2006, pp. 459-461, cited by other. |
B Clerckx, “Space-Time Signaling for Real-World MIMO Channels”, Sep. 2005, cited by other. |
R. F.H. Fischer et al, “A New Loading Algorithm for Discrete Multitone Transmission,” IEEE 1996, cited by other. |
A. Goldsmith et al., “Variable-Rate Variable-Power Mqam for Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1997, cited by other. |
A. Goldsmith et al., “Adaptive Coded Modulation for Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 46, No. 5, May 1998, cited by other. |
Z. Hong et al, “Spatial Multiplexing in Correlated Fading via the Virtual Channel Representation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Jun. 2001, cited by other. |
N. Khalelmouri et al., “A Minimum Co-User Interference Approach for Multi-User Mimo Downlink Precoding,” ICASSP 2006, cited by other. |
M. Vu et al., “MIMO Wireless Preceding,” www.stanford.edu!.abo11t.mh1 ..'SPM.sub.—MIMO.sub.—Wireless.sub.—Precoding—.pdf, cited by other. |
Kim et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/841,246, filed Aug. 31, 2006, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,902, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Office action mailed Jul. 14, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,902, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Response filed Oct. 14, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,902, filed Oct. 2. 2006, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 2, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,2013, filed Apr. 16, 2010, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 16, 2010, cited by other. |
Yi, “Beamforming for MIMO systems with limited feedback,” 2006 JET International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Nov. 6-9, 2006 pp. 1-3, cited by other. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion related to PCT/US2008/054355, dated Jun. 27, 2008, cited by other. |
Mondal, “Frame theoretic quantization for limited feedback Mimo beamforming systems” 2005 International conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, Jun. 13-16, 2005, PO. 1065-1070 vol. 2, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Overview and Way forward on MIMO Precoding in DL EUTRA,” R1-070220, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN, WG 1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Philips, “Comparison between MU-MIMO codebook-based channel reporting techniques for LTE downlink,” RI-062483, Oct. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting, #46bis, Seoul, cited by other. |
Philips, “System-level simulation results for channel vector quantisation feedback for MU-MIMO,” RI-063028, Nov. 2006. 3GPP, TGS RAN WGI Meeting #47, Riga, cited by other. |
Philips, “Comparison of MU-MIMO Feedback Schemes with Multiple UW Receive Antennas,” 3GG TSG RAN WGJ Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, Jan. 15-19, 2007, Tdoc RI-070346, cited by other. |
Alcatel, “Link-level results for multiuser eigenmode transmission with limited feedback”, RI-070318 JGG TSG RAN WG1Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, Jan. 15-19, 2007, Tdoc R1-070318, cited by other. |
Alcatel-Lucent, Philips, “Dedicated Reference Signals for MU-MIMO Precoding in E-UTRA Downlink,” TSG-RAN WG1 #48, St. Louis, Missouri, Feb. 12-16, 2007, R1-071069, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Scheme for MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA,” R1-070608 (this is an update of R1-070223 and in the document the number was R1-070223. The Examiner changed to 608), Jan. 2007,3GPP TGS RAN WGI Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Efficient method for feedback reduction and feedback mechanism for precoded MIMO in EUTRA”, R1-070221, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Aspects of SU/MU Switching and MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA,” R 1-070222, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN NG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
Freescale, “Scheme for MU-MIMO in DL EUTRA,” R1-070223, Jan. 2006, 3GPP TGS RAN WG1 Meeting #47bis, Sorrento, Italy, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,508, filed Mar. 16, 2007, Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,508, filed Mar. 16, 2007, Response filed May 3, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,508, filed Mar. 16, 2007, Supplemental Response filed May 17, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/687,508, filed Mar. 16, 2007, Notice of Allowance mailed May 28, 2010, cited by other. |
A. Bourdoux et al., “Joint TX-RX Optimisation for MIMO-SDMA Based on a Null-space Constraint,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, 2002, cited by other. |
K. Wong et al., “Performance Enhancement of Multiuser MIMO Wireless Communication Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002, cited by other. |
Wei et al., “Tackling MIMO-OFDMA Feedback Load Through Feedback Encoding”, IEEE Wireless Communication Systems, pp. 363-367, (Sep. 6-8, 2009), cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Office Action mailed Oct. 27, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Response filed Jan. 27, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Response filed Jul. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Oct. 22, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27. 2006, Supplemental Response filed Oct. 22, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,679, filed Sep. 27, 2006, Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2011 cited by other. |
B. Banister et al., “A Simple Gradient Sign Algorithm for Transmit Antenna Weight Adaptation with Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 51, No. 5, May 2003, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al. “Effect of Feedback Delay on Limited Feedback for Temporally Correlated Channels,” Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Joint Beamforming and Scheduling for SOMA Systems with Limited Feedback,” Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Limited Feedback for Temporally-Correlated Channels.sub.—Feedback Rate and Delay,” Mar. or Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Markov models for multi-antenna limited feedback systems,” ICASSP, Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Multi-Antenna Limited Feedback for Temporally-Correlated Channels Feedback Compression,” Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Orthogonal Beamforming in SOMA Downlink with Limited Feedback,” Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
J.C. Roh et al., “An Efficient Feedback Method for MIMO Systems with Slowly Time-Varying Channels,” IEEE communications Society, WCNC 2004, cited by other. |
N. Wei et al., “Tackling MIMO-OFDMA Feedback Load Through Feedback Encoding”, Sep. 6-8, 2009, IEEE Explore, pp. 363-367, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Preliminary Amendment, dated Nov. 27, 2006, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Response to Office Action filed Jun. 18, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2. 2006, Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Response to Office Action filed Dec. 29, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2. 2006, Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Response to Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,948, filed Oct. 2, 2006, Response to Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
N. Jindal, “Finite Rate Feedback MIMO Broadcast Channels.” Feb. 2006, ita.ucsd.edtc workshop/06/talb″papers/79.pdf, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,203, filed Jan. 5, 2007, Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,203, filed Jan. 5, 2007, Response filed Apr. 14, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,203, filed Jan. 5, 2007, Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
B. Hassibi, “An Efficient Square-Root Algorithm for Blast,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Jan. 27, 2000, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,557, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,557, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Response to Office Action mailed Mar. 15, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,557, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 4, 2010, cited by other. |
D. Love, “Limited Feedback Unitary Precoding for Spatial Multiplexing Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, No. 8, Aug. 2005, cited by other. |
A. Goldsmith, “The Capacity of Downlink Fading Channels with Variable Rate and Power,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 46, No. 3, Aug. 1997, cited by other. |
K Huang et al., “Effect of Feedback Delay on Limited Feedback for Temporally Correlated Channels,” Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
K Huang et al., “Joint Beamforming and Scheduling for SOMA Systems with Limited Feedback”, Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K Huang et al., “Limited Feedback for Temporally-Correlated Channels—Feedback Rate and Delay”, Mar. or Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K Huang et al., “Markov models for multi-antenna limited feedback systems”, Jun. 2006, cited by other. |
K- Huang et al, “Multi-Antenna Limited Feedback for Temporally-Correlated Channels Feedback Compression,” Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
K. Huang et al., “Orthogonal Beamforming in SOMA Downlink with Limited Feedback”, Jul. 2006, cited by other. |
D. Love et al., “Feedback Methods for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Wireless Systems”, 2004, cited by other. |
P. Chow, “A Practical Discrete Multitone Transceiver Loading Algorithm for Data Transmission over Spectrally Shaped Channels”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 43, No. 2/3/4, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1995, cited by other. |
R. Fischer et al., “A New Loading Algorithm for Discrete Multitone Transmission,” Global Telecommnnications Conference, GLOBECOM, 1996, cited by other. |
P. Xia et al., “Multiantenna Adaptive Modulation with Beamforming Based on Bandwidth-Constrained Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 53, No. 3, Mar. 2005, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Response filed Jul. 30, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2009, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Response filed Feb. 5, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Pre-Appeal Brief filed Jul. 27, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Notice of Panel Decision mailed Aug. 19, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,280, filed Sep. 28, 2006, Request for Continued Examination filed Nov. 30, 2010, cited by other. |
S.V. Bana et al., “Space Division Multiple Access (SDMA) for Robust Ad hoc Vehicle Communication Networks,” The IEEE Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, cited by other. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160043788 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13867900 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14845506 | US | |
Parent | 13230683 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13867900 | US | |
Parent | 11687376 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 13230683 | US |