1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to exterior wall systems for commercial and residential structures. In another aspect, the invention concerns lightweight precast concrete wall panels.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Precast concrete wall panels have been used for years to provide durable and aesthetically pleasing exterior walls. One disadvantage of traditional precast concrete wall panels is the weight of the panels. The high weight of conventional precast wall panels can make them expensive to ship and erect. Further, because heavy wall panels cause deflection of structural steel wall members supporting the panels, the strength of the steel frame of a building may need to be increased in order to adequately support concrete wall panels without excessive deflection. Such a need to increase the strength of the structural steel members of a building can add significantly to the overall cost of the building.
In recent years, several lightweight alternatives to traditional precast concrete wall panels have been used. One such system is commonly known as EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finish System). EIFS is a multi-layered exterior wall system that typically consists of a lightweight pliable insulation board covered with a fiberglass reinforced base coat that is coated with a colored acrylic finish coat. Although EIFS is lightweight and provides thermal insulation, a number of drawbacks are associated with EIFS. For example, EIFS walls have a tendency to crack and allow moisture to seep between the EIFS layers or between the innermost EIFS layer and the interior wall. In either case, such leakage can cause water damage and/or damage due to mold or mildew. In fact, the tendency of EIFS wall systems to leak has caused many insurance companies to stop writing policies covering EIFS structures. A further disadvantage of EIFS is its lack of durability. For example, simply bumping an EIFS wall with a lawn mower or other equipment during routine lawn maintenance can physically and visibly damage the EIFS wall, thereby necessitating expensive repair. Another problem with EIFS is the inability to form a true caulk joint at the edge of the wall. This inability to form a true caulk joint is caused by the fact that EIFS walls lack a sufficiently thick rigid edge. A proper caulk joint typically requires at least one inch of rigid edge so that a backer-rod can be inserted into a joint and a bead of caulk can fill the joint and seal against at least one half inch of the rigid edge. This allows the seal to maintain integrity during normal shifting and expansion/contraction of the structure. Thus, the lack of a true caulk joint in EIFS walls can contribute to moisture leakage.
Another lightweight wall system that has been introduced in recent years employs precast GFRC (Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete) wall panels. GFRC wall panels are relatively strong compared to EIFS, but have a number of drawbacks. The main drawback of GFRC wall panels is expense. The making of GFRC wall panels is a labor intensive process wherein concrete and glass fibers are sprayed in a form. In addition to high labor costs associated with GFRC fabrication, the material cost of the glass fibers adds significantly to the overall cost of a GFRC wall panel.
Another relatively lightweight wall panel system that is being used today is commonly known as “slender wall.” Slender wall prefabricated wall panels typically include a relatively thin steel-reinforced concrete slab with structural steel framing rigidly attached to one side of the slab. A disadvantage of the slender wall system is that it requires the concrete supplier to fabricate the metal frame backup system, which requires a significant amount of design and fabrication time. Another disadvantage is that the inside face of the metal frame must be in near perfect alignment for proper drywall attachment.
Responsive to these and other problems, it is an object of the present invention to provide a lightweight, durable, and inexpensive prefabricated wall panel system.
A further object of the invention is to provide a lightweight prefabricated wall panel of sufficient rigidity and thickness so that a proper caulk joint can be formed around the edge of the panel.
Another object of the invention is to provide a prefabricated wall panel system that can easily be attached to a thin metal framing member (e.g., a metal stud or C/Z purlin) of a support wall.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a lightweight concrete wall panel that is strong enough to withstand conventional handling and transporting methods without cracking.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved method of constructing a wall using lightweight precast concrete wall panels.
It should be understood that not all of the above-listed objects need be accomplished by the present invention, and further objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, the drawings, and the claims.
Accordingly, in one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a lightweight precast wall panel comprising a concrete slab, a pair of elongated spaced-apart first channels, and a plurality of elongated spaced-apart second channels. The first channels extend substantially parallel to one another. The second channels extend substantially parallel to one another. The first and second channels are partially embedded in the slab and extend substantially perpendicular to one another. At least some of the second channels are disposed between the first channels.
In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of constructing a wall comprising the steps of: (a) erecting a support wall having a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic outer wall framing members; (b) positioning a precast concrete wall panel adjacent the support wall, with the wall panel including a concrete slab, a pair of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic side channels, and a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic attachment channels, wherein the side channels and attachment channels extend substantially perpendicular to one another, at least some of the attachment channels are disposed between the side channels, and the side channels and attachment channels are partially embedded in the slab; and (c) coupling the wall panel to the support wall by extending self-tapping screws through the wall framing members and the attachment channels at attachment locations where the attachment channels and the framing members cross.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a precast concrete wall system comprising a support wall, a precast wall panel, and a plurality of fasteners. The support wall includes a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic framing members. The precast wall panel includes a concrete slab, a pair of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic side channels, and a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic attachment channels. The attachment channels are elongated in a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the direction of elongation of the side channels and the framing members. The side channels and attachment channels are partially embedded in the slab. The fasteners extend through the framing members and attachment channels at attachment locations where the framing members and attachment channels cross.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
Referring initially to
Referring to
Referring to
The shape, size, and weight of wall panel 24 can vary greatly depending on the particular application for which wall panel 24 is used. However, it is an object of the present invention to provide a durable concrete wall panel that is significantly lighter than traditional concrete wall panels. Thus, it is preferred for wall panel 24 to have a weight in the range of from about 5 to about 30 pounds per square foot, more preferably in the range of from about 10 to about 20 pounds per square foot, and most preferably in the range of from 12 to 18 pounds per square foot. It is further preferred for the thickness of slab 30 to be in the range of from about 1 to about 4 inches, more preferably in the range of from about 1.25 to about 3 inches, and most preferably in the range of from 1.5 to 2 inches. Although the length and width of slab 30 can vary greatly depending on the specific application for which slab 30 is fabricated, it is preferred for slab 30 to have a length in the range of from about 4 to about 20 feet and a width in the range of from about 4 to about 15 feet, more preferably a length in the range of from 8 to 16 feet and a width in the range of from 6 to 12 feet. Because attachment channels 32b provide the means by which wall panel 24 is coupled to support wall 26 (shown in
Referring to
The use of self-tapping screws 48 as the primary means for attaching wall panel 24 to support wall 26 and supporting wall panel 24 on support wall 26 provides numerous advantages. For example, the alignment of wall panel 24 relative to support wall 26 can be readily adjusted because a proper attachment location 46 can be formed at any location where attachment channel 32b crosses thin metal framing member 28. Further, it is not necessary for the outer channel surface 38 of each attachment channel 32b to fit flushly with the outer framing member surface 50 of each metal framing member 28 because a shim 52 can readily be placed between outer channel surface 38 of attachment channel 32b and outer framing member surface 50 of metal framing member 28 to fill any gap between thin metal framing member 28 and attachment channel 32b prior to extending self-tapping screw 48 through metal framing member 28, shim 52, and attachment channel 32b. Further, this configuration for attaching wall panel 24 to support wall 26 allows thermal insulation 54 to be placed between outer channel surface 38 and outer framing member surface 50 at each attachment location 46. Such thermal insulation 54 can enhance the thermal efficiency of wall system 42 by inhibiting thermal conduction between attachment channel 32b and metal framing member 28.
Because self-tapping screw 48 is the preferred means for coupling attachment channel 32b to metal framing member 28, metal framing member 28 and attachment channel 32b must be configured to allow self-tapping screw 48 to extend therethrough. Thus, it is preferred for both metal framing member 28 and attachment channel 32b to be formed of thin metal. Preferably, the thickness of metal framing member 28 and attachment channel 32b at attachment location 46 is in the range of from about 0.01 to about 0.2 inches, more preferably in the range of from about 0.02 to about 0.1 inches, and most preferably in the range of from 0.03 to 0.05 inches. This thickness of metal framing member 28 and attachment channel 32b is thin enough to allow self-tapping screw 48 to readily create a hole in metal framing member 28 and metallic attachment channel 32b, but is thick enough to allow formation of a suitably strong connection between metal framing member 28 and metallic attachment channel 32b via self-tapping screw 48.
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The preferred forms of the invention described above are to be used as illustration only, and should not be used in a limiting sense to interpret the scope of the present invention. Obvious modifications to the exemplary embodiments, set forth above, could be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
The inventors hereby state their intent to rely on the Doctrine of Equivalents to determine and assess the reasonably fair scope of the present invention as pertains to any apparatus not materially departing from but outside the literal scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
The present application is a continuation and claims priority benefit, with regard to all common subject matter, of an earlier-filed U.S. patent application entitled “CHANNEL-REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL PANEL SYSTEM”, Ser. No. 10/404,588, filed Mar. 31, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,151. The identified earlier-filed application is hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1994716 | Klemperer | Mar 1935 | A |
2945328 | Webb | Jul 1960 | A |
3557511 | Curran | Jan 1971 | A |
3956864 | Fung | May 1976 | A |
4373314 | Allan | Feb 1983 | A |
4437272 | Johnson | Mar 1984 | A |
4472919 | Nourse | Sep 1984 | A |
4602467 | Schilger | Jul 1986 | A |
4703602 | Pardo | Nov 1987 | A |
4751803 | Zimmerman | Jun 1988 | A |
4885884 | Schilger | Dec 1989 | A |
4909007 | Bodnar | Mar 1990 | A |
4972537 | Slaw, Sr. | Nov 1990 | A |
5072565 | Wilnau | Dec 1991 | A |
5239798 | Saito | Aug 1993 | A |
5414972 | Ruiz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5758463 | Mancini, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5809703 | Kelly | Sep 1998 | A |
5884442 | Breault | Mar 1999 | A |
5975810 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000194 | Nakamura | Dec 1999 | A |
6003278 | Weaver et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6230465 | Messenger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6668507 | Blanchet | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701683 | Messenger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708459 | Bodnar | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6817151 | Foderberg et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6837013 | Foderberg et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20040065043 | Foderberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050050825 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10404588 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10951843 | US |