Current users of portable mattresses such as camping mattresses generally have a choice between highly insulating, self-inflating, mattresses having open cell foam cores, and highly compactable, non-self-inflating air mattresses having complicated film and/or fabric cores. Simple foam core mattresses are inexpensive to manufacture because of the core simplicity, but are comparatively bulky and heavy, while similar class air mattresses are more expensive to manufacture when attempting to achieve comparable thermal efficiencies but are not self-inflating and often fail to achieve thermal efficiency goals.
One approach to decrease weight and increase compactability of foam core mattresses has been to create holes and/or voids in the foam cores of such mattresses. While these holes and/or voids served to decrease bulk and weight while maintaining the benefits of conventional bonded mattresses technologies (e.g., high thermal efficiency and user comfort), the approach was process intensive and/or generating of waste. Examples of such approaches can be found in several self-inflating mattresses that are being of have been sold by Cascade Designs, Inc. such as the CampRest and ProLite mattress pads.
These cored or expanded foam mattresses, when subjected to internal pressures in excess of nominal, self-inflation levels, did not materially increase the mattress thickness over the core thickness. This displacement limiting functionality of the bonded form cores intentionally and beneficially prevent the “balloon effect” commonly found in pure air mattresses.
Finally, even expanded core mattresses used an initial core that was no less than 75% of the planar area of the inflatable mattress of which it would make up. This limitation, in large part, was due to the mechanical limitations of the foam slab used to form the foam core: compliance was needed to “expand” the slits that formed the voids, but too much compliance in the foam resulted in performance degradation at the foam-panel bonds.
The invention is directed to hybrid inflatable bodies comprising opposing flexible panel portions sealed at a common perimeter thereof, and having valve means for selectively allowing fluid ingress and egress between the environment and a chamber substantially defined by inner surfaces of the flexible panels. Such inflatable bodies further comprise a core that is selectively bonded to the inner surfaces of the panel portions, characterized in that the bodies have a reduced bonded area to non-bonded area ratios and/or have elongate extending air channels extending through the inflatable body. As used herein, a panel bonded area is that area of a panel that is bonded to the core, which functions as a displacement restraining means or tensile element. For purposes of this disclosure and particularly in this respect, U.S. Pat. No. 3,872,525 issued to Lea, et al. is referenced for background purposes and is incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, elongate extending air channels are characterized as core-free channels bounded, at least in part, by opposing panels of the inflatable body (i.e., non-bonded areas) that extend in a transverse direction (i.e., normal to anticipated user-initiated compressive forces). In many preferred embodiments, the core is comprised of an open cell foam, such as an expanded or foamed polyurethane.
The reduced panel bonded area characteristics of various invention embodiments may be achieved through the use of channelized cores. Channelization in some embodiments comprises deriving two unitary cores from a single slab of core material such as foam, and in other embodiments channelization comprises deriving non-unitary cores from a single half slab of core material, while in still other embodiment channelization comprises deriving at least one unitary core and at least one part of a non-unitary core from a single slab of core material (as well as several non-unitary cores in addition to the unitary core). As used herein, the term “non-unitary” means a core structure comprising a plurality of discrete core elements that, when integrated into an inflatable body, constitute a singular core.
For embodiments wherein a single slab yields two unitary cores, a preferred core geometry is one characterized as having a root or spine portion from which extend a plurality of ribs, wherein the ribs partially define future elongate extending air channels when the core is integrated with the opposing panel portions, as previously described. By slitting or otherwise cutting such a core from a slab, it is possible to create a second core by limiting the distance of rib extensions, i.e., prior to reaching the opposing side of the slab. In this case, removal of the ribs from a first core from the slab forms the channels of a second core and vice versa. The result is a pair of cores that have three substantially contiguous sides and a highly variegated side (i.e., the rib terminating side or side opposite the root/spine—hereinafter “the terminal side”). Since symmetry is preferred about the medial sagittal plane (lateral symmetry), the ribs preferably extend longitudinally in an elongate inflatable body, which then places the root/spine-terminal side asymmetry in the longitudinal direction. In the art of mattress pads, the terminal side may advantageously form an integrated pillow for a user, for reasons that will be described in greater detail below.
For embodiments wherein a half slab yields a single core, a preferred geometry is one characterized as having a mirrored geometry, such as a medial sagittal plane mirror (laterally symmetrical). In such embodiments, a root/spine and rib arrangement is created, however, the direction of rib extension in the core is preferably lateral as opposed to longitudinal if the slab is not symmetrical in both x and y axes, and by implication, the root/spine extends longitudinally. In some embodiments, the root/spines are centrally (medially) located within the inflatable body while in other embodiments, they are peripherally (laterally) located.
The use of channelized foam cores not only results in inflatable bodies having decreased densities over equivalent sized conventional foam core self-inflating bodies, but also notable increases compactability. Moreover, the presence of elongate extending air channels permits localized “ballooning” of the opposing panel portions, thereby increasing the sectional thickness of the inflatable body thereat, and often time perceived user comfort. Because this ballooning effect is only present at the air channels, which are necessarily at least partially defined by the foam core, their location, frequency, geometry (rectilinear, curvilinear, or combinations thereof), the characteristics of each air channel can all be precisely established. With respect to the variegated side of certain foam core embodiments, the comparatively unbonded portion of the inflatable body thereat will balloon to a greater degree than other perimeter portions of the inflatable body and conveniently form a pillow-like structure.
Because a comparatively large portion of the opposing panels are not bonded to the foam core in view of the prior art, which results in material panel distension, the edges of the foam cores-panel interfaces thereat are subjected to greater shear or peeling forces. Additionally, the previously noted ballooning effect imparts greater tension forces in the foam care, particularly adjacent to the elongate extending air channels. As a consequence, a high tensile strength open cell foam material is preferably used and/or consideration is given to core thickness versus channel widths.
To increase the thermal performance of inflatable bodies according to the invention embodiments, the inner surfaces of the panels that form the inflatable body can be aluminized or otherwise treated with a radiant energy reflective treatment. Additionally, serpentine films or “gapped” films can be disposed between the foam core and panels to decrease convective heat transfer. These films can also be treated with a radiant energy reflective treatment to further limit radiant heat transfer.
For purposes of this patent, the terms “area”, “boundary”, “part”, “portion”, “surface”, “zone”, and their synonyms, equivalents and plural forms, as may be used herein and by way of example, are intended to provide descriptive references or landmarks with respect to the article and/or process being described. These and similar or equivalent terms are not intended, nor should be inferred, to delimit or define per se elements of the referenced article and/or process, unless specifically stated as such or facially clear from the several drawings and/or the context in which the term(s) is/are used.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of the invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/057563 | 9/25/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/048359 | 4/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3222697 | Scheermesser | Dec 1965 | A |
3286285 | Harvey, Jr. | Nov 1966 | A |
3918110 | Cantillo et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4197342 | Bethe | Apr 1980 | A |
4207636 | Ceriani | Jun 1980 | A |
4276666 | Yamada | Jul 1981 | A |
4673452 | Awdhan | Jun 1987 | A |
5282286 | MacLeish | Feb 1994 | A |
5329656 | Leggett | Jul 1994 | A |
5452487 | Leggett | Sep 1995 | A |
5906019 | McCarthy | May 1999 | A |
5911657 | Meiners | Jun 1999 | A |
6185770 | Wang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6446289 | Su et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463610 | Shulte et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488153 | Morris | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6651277 | Marson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
20040163178 | Corneil | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040226100 | Small, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20100043148 | Rose et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2565127 | Jul 1996 | CA |
704999 | Nov 2012 | CH |
0632984 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1472958 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1472958 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2413488 | Nov 2005 | GB |
WO 1999066817 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2009094208 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/057563, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 9 pages. |
Baeumer Germany: “Baeumer EP (Profiling machine)”, Jul. 30, 2012, XP054977965, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e80arVVU8ig [retrieved on Dec. 19, 2017]. |
European Supplementary Partial European Search Report, EP Application No. 14849685.4, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170164759 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61882622 | Sep 2013 | US |