1. Technical Field
This disclosure relates to determining a character count for an image, such as a financial document image. This disclosure also relates to determining the character count of the image without recognizing the identity of the characters in the image.
2. Description of Related Art
Systems may receive digital images for processing. As one example, an electronic device may capture an image of a financial document, such as a check. The user can submit the image of the check to a financial institution server for processing and deposit of the check. However, the check image may be degraded in multiple ways. The check may be overly cropped by the user such that important fields or portions of the check are cropped out of the check image. The image capture device of the electronic device may capture a blurry image of the check. These degradations may inhibit subsequent processing of the check image.
The descriptions below include methods, systems, logic, and devices for processing an image and determining a number of characters in the image with recognizing or attempting to recognize the actual text or characters in the image. In one aspect, a method is performed by circuitry, such as a processor, in an electronic device. The method performed by the circuitry includes receiving a financial document image and identifying a text chunk in the financial document image by determining a first pixel of the financial document image as the top left pixel of the text chunk based on a top left score of the first pixel and determining a second pixel of the financial document image as top right pixel of the text chunk based on a top right score of the second pixel. The method further includes determining a character count for the text chunk without recognizing any particular character in the text chunk.
In another aspect, a system includes a memory and a processor. The processor is operable to receive a financial document image and identify a text chunk in the financial document image by determining a first pixel of the financial document image as top left pixel of the text chunk based on a top left score of the first pixel and determining a second pixel of the financial document image as top right pixel of the text chunk based on a top right score of the second pixel. The processor is also operable to determine a chunk extension for the text chunk and add the chunk extension to the text chunk. After adding the chunk extension to the text chunk, the processor is operable to determine a character count for the text chunk without recognizing any particular character in the text chunk.
In another aspect, a non-transitory computer readable medium includes instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to receive a financial document image; identify an interest region in the financial document image; and identify a text chunk in the interest region of the financial document image. The instructions cause the processor to identify the text chunk by determining a first pixel of the financial document image as top left pixel of the text chunk based on a top left score of the first pixel and determining a second pixel of the financial document image as top right pixel of the text chunk based on a top right score of the second pixel. The instructions also cause the processor to determine a character count for the text chunk in the interest region of the financial document image without recognizing any particular character in the text chunk; determine a character count for the interest region by summing the character count for the text chunk with a character count of any additional text chunks in the interest region; and determine whether the character count for the interest region exceeds a minimum character count threshold specifically for the interest region.
The innovation may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. In the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The communication network 106 may include any number of networks for communicating data. In that regard, the communication network 106 may include intermediate network devices or logic operating according to any communication number of mediums, protocols, topologies, or standards. As examples, the communication network 106 may communicate across any of the following mediums, protocols, topologies and standards: Ethernet, cable, DSL, Multimedia over Coax Alliance, power line, Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON), Gigabit Passive Optical Network (GPON), any number of cellular standards (e.g., 2G, 3G, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), GSM® Association, Long Term Evolution (LTE)™, or more), WiFi (including 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), WiMAX, Bluetooth, WiGig, and more.
The exemplary system 100 shown in
In some implementations, the image processing system 104 may include a communication interface 110, processing circuitry 112, and a user interface 114. The processing circuitry 112 of the image processing system 104 may perform any functionality associated with the image processing system 104, including any combination of the image processing techniques and methods described below. In one implementation, the processing circuitry 112 includes one or more processors 116 and a memory 120. The memory 120 may store image processing instructions 122 and character count parameters 124. The character count parameters 124 may include any parameters, settings, configurations, or criteria that control how the processing circuitry 112 determines process an image, including determining of a character count for the image. In some variations, the electronic device 102, such as a mobile device, may additionally or alternatively implement any of the functionality of the processing circuitry 112 described herein.
The processing circuitry 112 may process any digital image that may include text. As examples, the processing circuitry 112 may process an image of any type of financial document, including negotiable instruments such as personal checks, business checks, money orders, promissory notes, certificate of deposits, and more. As additional examples, the processing circuitry 112 may process images of any other type, such as a image of any type of insurance form or document, tax documents (e.g., form 1040), employment forms, savings bonds, traveler's checks, job applications, any type of bill, such as an automotive repair bill or medical bill, a remittance coupon, and images of many more types.
The processing circuitry 112 may convert the financial document image 200 into a pixel array for processing. To illustrate, the financial document image 200 in
Exemplary processes through which the processing circuitry 112 may determine or estimate a character count for the financial document image 200 are presented next. First, the processing circuitry 112 may identify one or more text chunks in the financial document image 200, for example as described through
Identifying Text Chunks
The processing circuitry 112 may identify one or more text chunks in the financial document image 200. A text chunk may refer to a particular portion of set of pixels of the financial document image 200 that may contain one or more text characters. In doing so, the processing circuitry 112 may evaluate the financial document image 200 to determine the likelihood particular portions (e.g., particular pixels) of the image 200 correspond to the boundary of a character, such as any edge, a top right corner, a top left corner, or other boundary portion of a text character.
In particular, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a likelihood that an image pixel corresponds to or is within a particular distance from the top left corner of a character. In some variations, the processing circuitry 112 may apply a top left scoring algorithm for pixels in the financial document image 200 to specify this likelihood. In scoring a particular pixel, the top left scoring algorithm may account for any number of other pixels surrounding the particular pixel. One such example is presented next in
The character count parameters 124 may specify dimensions for a scoring grid according to any number of factors, some of which are presented next. The processing circuitry 112 may resize the financial document image 200 such that expected text of the image has a particular size, e.g., a MICR line, courtesy amount line, or other particular text in the financial document image 200 has particular pixel height, width, or pixel size range. The character count parameters 124 may specify, for example, dimensions for the top left scoring grid 301 such that the top left scoring grid 301 (or a non-padded portion thereof as discussed in greater detail below) covers a predetermined portion of an expected text character in the financial document image 200. As another variation, the character count parameters 124 may specify a scoring grid size that covers ⅓ the width an expected text character and ½ the height of an expected text character, which may be specified in pixels.
In some implementations, the character count parameters 124 specify the dimensions of a scoring grid to account for a particular pixel density of the financial document image 200. For instance, the character count parameters 124 may specify a particular dimension (e.g., 6 pixels wide by 9 pixels high) for scoring grid given a particular pixel density of the image 200 (e.g., for a 200 Dots-Per-Inch image). Additionally or alternatively, the character count parameters 124 may specify a scoring grid dimension to account for a minimum expected font size or minimum relevant font size in an image, for which the pixel size may vary depending on how the image was resized by the processing circuitry 112.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a top left score for a pixel. The scoring algorithm may implement a scoring range indicative of the likelihood that the image pixel 302 corresponds to a top left corner of a character or is within a particular padded distance from the top left corner of a character. With regards to a padded distance, the top left scoring algorithm may include a padding parameter. The padding parameter may specify a particular padding of white pixels that surround the top left corner of a character. For example, with a padding parameter value of 2, the image pixel 302 may have an increased top left score when the image pixel 302 is two pixels above and two pixels to the left of a top left corner pixel of a text character. For top left scoring, the character count parameters 124 may specify a top padding parameter, a left padding parameter, or both.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a top left score for the image pixel 302 according to the distribution of white and/or black pixels in the top left scoring grid 301. With padding, the scoring algorithm may indicate a higher likelihood of the image pixel 302 corresponding to a top left corner of a character when particular portions of the top left scoring grid 301 are white pixels, e.g. a white padded portion of the top left scoring grid 301. Along similar lines, the scoring algorithm may indicate a higher likelihood of a pixel corresponding to the top left corner when particular portions of the top left scoring grid 301 are black pixels, e.g., a black character portion. As one example, for a padding parameter value of 2 (for both top and left), the character count parameters 124 may specify an ideal distribution of white and black pixels in a 6×6 top left scoring grid 301 as the following configuration:
The ideally white (W) pixels in the above ideal configuration may form the white padded portion for determining a top left score and the ideally black pixels (B) may form the black character portion for determining a top left score. When determining a top left score for a pixel, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the proportion of the white padded portion of the top left scoring grid 301 for that pixel that includes white pixels and the proportion of the black character portion that includes black pixels.
The processing circuitry 112 may apply weights when evaluating the pixels in the top left scoring grid 301. That is, the processing circuitry 112 may give more or less weight when a particular pixel in a particular position in the top left scoring grid 301 is either white or black. For instance, the character count parameters 124 may specify greater weight for pixels that are closer to a particular pixel, edge, or region in the top left scoring grid 301. One exemplary weighting for a 6×6 top left scoring grid 301 with a padding parameter value of 2 is as follows:
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
2
2
4
3
2
1
In the above weighting, white pixels in the white padded portion are given a weight (e.g., multiplier) by 1 or 2. Black pixels in the white padded portion may be given a weight of 0. Black pixels in the black character portion are given a weight of 4, 3, 2 or 1, as shown by the underlined weights for pixels in the black character portion. White pixels in the black character portion may be given a weight of 0. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a weighted proportion of white pixels in the white padded portion (e.g., a white padded score), for example by dividing a weighted sum for the pixels in a white padded portion by the ideal weighted value for the white padded portion. The processing circuitry 112 may determine a black character score in a consistent manner as well.
To illustrate, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the top left score for the image pixel 302 with the particular top left scoring grip 301 depicted in
Applying the weights for white and black pixels in the white padded portion, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the following weighted values for the white padded portion:
Summing the weighted values, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the weighted sum for the white padded portions as 21. The processing circuitry 112 may identify the ideal weighted value (e.g., when all the pixels in the white padded portion are white) as 29. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the white padded score of the top left scoring grid 301 shown in
The processing circuitry 112 may similarly determine a black character score of the top left scoring grid 301. The processing circuitry 112 may apply the exemplary weighting shown above for the black character portion of the top left scoring grid 301 in
In this example, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the weighted sum for the black character portion as 35 and the ideal weighted sum (e.g., when all the pixels in the black character portion are black) as 50. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may, in one implementation, determine the weighted black character score of the top left scoring grid 301 shown in
The processing circuitry 112 may additionally apply weights when accounting for the white padded score and the black character score. When weighted equally, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the top left score of the image pixel 302 as the average the white padded score and black character score. In this example, the processing circuitry 112 determines the top left score of the image pixel 302 as (0.5)*0.72+(0.5)*0.70=0.71, as shown in
The processing circuitry 112 may determine the top left score for the image pixel 302 as well as for any number of other pixels in the financial document image 200. The top left score determination method above may provide an quick and efficient method for determining the likelihood a particular pixel corresponds to the top left corner of a text character. The processing circuitry 112 may determine a respective top left score for pixels and identify pixels with a greater likelihood of corresponding to the top left corner of a character without, for example, performing edge detection processes or other processing-intensive processes.
While some particular examples have been presented above, the character count parameters 124 may specify any number of different configurations for determining a top left score, including varying height and width dimensions for the top left scoring grid 301, varying padding parameter values (including top padding, left padding, or both), as well as varying weight configurations, such as weights applied to particular pixels in the white padded portion or the black character portions, or to the white padded and black character scores. Another weighting configuration for a 6×9 top left scoring grid 301 with a top and left padding of 3 may be as follows (with black character portion weights underlined):
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
In this example, the white padded portion is weighted along the edge of the top and left edges of a character and the black character portion is weighted to emphasize the top left pixel of the character. The character count parameters 124 may implement any number of varying configurations through which the processing circuitry 112 determines the top left score for pixels in the financial document image 200.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a respective top left score for some or all of the pixels in the financial document image 200. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may abstain or forego determining the top left score for a pixel when the pixel is in a particular region of the financial document image 200, e.g., in the bottom-most row of the image 200, within a predetermined number of rows from the bottom-most row, in the right-most column of the image 200, or within a predetermined number of rows from the right-most column. As another example, the processing circuitry 112 may selectively determine the top left scores for pixels within a predetermined pixel distance from an interest region of the financial document image 200, such as the Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) location of a check, from a particular form field of an insurance document, and the like.
Before, during, or after determining the top left score for pixels in the financial document image 200, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a top right score for one or more pixels in the financial document image 200. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a likelihood that an image pixel corresponds to or is within a particular pixel distance from the top right corner of a text character. The processing circuitry 112 may apply a scoring algorithm similar in many respects to top left scoring algorithm described above, but with any number of variances. For example, the configuration, weights, and other parameters specified by the character count parameters 124 for determining the top right score may be vertically mirrored from those used for determining a top left score.
The character count parameters 124 may specify distinct parameters through which the processing circuitry 112 determines a top right score for a pixel. In that regard, the character count parameters 124 may specify different configurations for a top right scoring grid as compared to the top left scoring grid, including differences in scoring grid dimensions, weights applied to pixels within a top right scoring grid, etc. In particular, the processing circuitry 112 may use a top padding parameter value and/or right padding parameter value in determining the top right score for a pixel, but not a left padding parameter value (as compared to the top left score determination parameters that may include a top left padding parameter value but not a top right padding parameter value).
The ideally white (W) pixels in the above ideal configuration may form the white padded portion for determining the top right score for a particular pixel, e.g., the top right pixel of the top right scoring grid 501. The ideally black (B) pixels in the above ideal configuration may form the black character portion for determining the top right score. One exemplary weighting for a 6×6 top right scoring grid 501 with a padding value of 2 is as follows (with black character weights underlined):
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
2
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
As seen, this exemplary weighting for a 6×6 top right scoring grid 501 is vertically mirrored from the exemplary weighting for a 6×6 top left scoring grid 301 discussed above.
The processing circuitry 112 may apply the weights to the top right scoring grid 501 for the image pixel 502 specifically shown in
W
W
B
B
B
W
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
The processing circuitry 112 may determine the weighted sum of the white padded portion to be 29 and the ideal weighted sum to be 29. In this example, the processing circuitry 112 determines the white padded score as 29/29=1.0. Following consistent respective calculations, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the black character score as 0.70. The processing circuitry 112 may, for example, apply the same weight to each score and determine the top right score of the image pixel 502 as (0.5)*1.0+(0.5)*(0.70)=0.85, as shown in
The processing circuitry 112 may determine top right scores and top left scores for some or all of the pixels in the financial document image 200. For a particular pixel, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a top right score for the particular pixel, a top left score for the particular pixel, or both. After determining top right and top left scores for pixels of the financial document image 200, the processing circuitry 112 may use the determined top right scores and top left scores to identify text chunks in the financial document image 200.
The processing circuitry 112 may identify a text chunk by determining one or more boundary pixels or edges for the text chunk. As one exemplary process described in greater detail below, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a top left pixel of the text chunk, a top right pixel of the text chunk, and a bottom edge of the text chunk. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may sequentially consider pixels in the financial document image 200 to identify a boundary of a text chunk. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may start the sequential processing of pixels for the text chunk determination process at the top left pixel of the financial document image 200. Or, the processing circuitry 112 may start with a pixel belongs to a particular portion of the financial document image 200, e.g., a MICR line portion of a check image.
The processing circuitry 112 may identify pixels or boundaries for a text chunk according to any number of chunk boundary criteria, which may be specified by the character count parameters 124. For a current pixel being considered for text chunk identification, the processing circuitry 112 may first determine whether the current pixel is already part of a previously determined text chunk. If so, the processing circuitry 112 may exclude the current pixel from belonging to another text chunk and proceed to a subsequent pixel for consideration.
When a current pixel is not part of a previously determined text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may determine whether the current pixel meets chunk boundary criteria for a top left pixel of the text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may identify the current pixel as the top left pixel for a text chunk when the top left score of the current pixel is equal to or exceeds a top left score threshold, such as a top left score threshold of 0.65 in some implementations. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may identify a top left pixel for the text chunk without performing additional or more complicated image processing techniques, e.g., without performing edge detection algorithms. After determining a top left pixel for a text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the top right pixel for the text chunk.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a top right pixel for the text chunk by evaluating pixels to the right of the determined top left pixel of the text chunk. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a set of potential top right pixels based on the top left scores of the pixels being evaluated, e.g., top right candidate pixels. In one implementation, the processing circuitry 112 determines the top right candidate pixels for the text chunk as a set of consecutive pixels with a top left score below a top left score threshold, as set by the character count parameters 124. The character count parameters 124 may specify the same or a different top left score threshold used for identifying the top left pixel of the text chunk and the top right candidate pixels of the text chunk.
To illustrate, the processing circuitry 112 may start at the determined top left pixel of the text chunk and sequentially consider pixels to the right of the top left pixel. When the current pixel has a top left score less than the top left score threshold for identifying a top right pixel (e.g., 0.65), the processing circuitry 112 may increment a counter value and continue to the next pixel. When the current pixel has a top left score equal to or greater than the top left score threshold for identifying a top right pixel (e.g., 0.65), the processing circuitry 112 may reset the counter to 0 and continue to the next pixel. When the counter value reaches a counter threshold value (e.g., 13), the processing circuitry 112 may identify a number of previously considered pixels equal to the counter threshold value as the top right candidate pixels (e.g., the 13 previously considered pixels when the counter threshold value is 13). An exemplary iteration of this process is presented in
The processing circuitry 112 may determine the top right pixel for the text chunk from among the top right candidate pixels 610. In some implementations, the processing circuitry 112 identifies the pixel with the highest top right score from among the top right candidate pixels 610 as the top right pixel for the text chunk. In the example shown in
After determining a top left and top right corner for a text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a bottom edge of the text chunk. In doing so, the processing circuitry 112 may consider rows of pixels below the particular row of pixels formed by and between the top left and top right pixels, e.g., the top row of the text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may identify a first row of pixels below the top row of the text chunk formed by the top left and top right pixels with a proportion of white pixels that exceeds a bottom edge threshold. In some variations, the character count parameters 124 may set the bottom edge threshold at 90%, for example. The processing circuitry 112 may determine the bottom edge of the text chunk as the upper edge of the identified first row of pixels with a proportion of white pixels that exceeds the bottom edge threshold.
In determining the bottom edge of the pixel chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may ignore or not consider a number of pixel rows at the top of the text chunk equal to the padding parameter value. For example, when the padding parameter value is set to 2, the processing circuitry 112 may not consider the top two rows of pixels formed between the top left and top right pixels when identifying the bottom edge of the text chunk. Put another way, the processing circuitry 112 may forego considering the top row of pixels that includes the top left and top right pixels and the next row of pixels directly below the top row when the padding parameter value is 2. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a text chunk formed by a top left pixel, a top right pixel, and a bottom edge. The processing circuitry 112 may further process the text chunk as well, some examples of which are shown in
In some variations, the processing circuitry 112 may pad the bottom edge 713 of a determined text chunk 710. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may add a number of rows of white pixels below the bottom edge 713 as set by the character count parameters 724. In the example shown in
In some variations, the processing circuitry 112 may adjust the left or right edges of a determined text chunk. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may pad the left edge of a text chunk, right edge of a text chunk, or both as similarly described above with regards to padding the bottom edge 713 of the text chunk 710. The processing circuitry 112 may additionally or alternatively adjust the left or right edges of a text chunk to include a chunk extension. In
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a chunk extension for a text chunk. In doing so, the processing circuitry 112 may consider the columns of pixels to the right or left of an edge of a text chunk and determine occurrence of a threshold number of consecutive white pixel columns, e.g., a consecutive number of columns each or which and/or collectively have a proportion of white pixels that exceed an extension threshold, such as 90% white pixels. The columns considered by the processing circuitry 112 may be to the left or right of the text chunk and have the same height as the text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may determine the chunk extension as the section of pixels between the edge of the text chunk and the identified consecutive white pixels columns.
As one particular example shown in
In processing the financial document image 200, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the text chunks 710 and 720 shown in
The processing circuitry 112 may read the character count parameters 124 (802) and receive an image (804). The image may, for example, be a financial document image 200 such as a check or insurance form. The processing circuitry 112 may perform various pre-processing on the image, such as cleaning up the image, resizing the image to control the text size of expected text in the image (e.g., text of a MICR line or courtesy line in a check), binarizing the image, or converting the image to a pixel array.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a respective top left score for some or all of the pixels in the image (804). The processing circuitry 112 may determine a respective top right score for some or all of the pixels in the image (806), including for pixels different from the pixels for which the processing circuitry 112 determines respective top left scores. In some implementations, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the top left scores and/or top right scores for specific portions (e.g., interest regions) of the image, and decline or skip determining the top left and/or top right scores for pixels outside of the interest regions of the image. As one example, the character count parameters 124 may specify a MICR line region, upper left hand corner, amount region on the middle right side, or other portions of a check image as interest regions.
Upon determining the top left and top right scores for image pixels in the image, the processing circuitry 112 may sequentially process pixels in the image. In that regard, the processing circuitry may determine whether any additional pixels in the image remain for processing (810), e.g., whether any unprocessed pixels remain in the interest region(s) of the image. If so, the processing circuitry 112 may set a current pixel (812). The processing circuitry 112 may set the current pixel as the next pixel in a pixel processing ordering. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may process pixels ordering from left to right and row by row from the top left corner of the image to the bottom right corner of the image or interest region.
For a current pixel, the processing circuitry 112 determines whether the current pixel is already part of a previously formed text chunk (816). For example, the processing circuitry 112 may access a listing of determined text chunks for the image, and determine whether the pixel is already part of another determined text chunk. If so, the processing circuitry 112 may proceed to consider a subsequent pixel of the image or interest region, if any remain (810).
The processing circuitry 112 may determine the boundaries of a text chunk. In that regard, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a top left corner for the text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may determine, for example, whether the top left score of the current pixel exceeds (or alternatively, is equal to or greater than) a top left score threshold, which may be set by the character count parameters 124. When the top left score of the current pixel does not exceed the top left score threshold, the processing circuitry 112 may proceed to consider a subsequent pixel of the image or interest region, if any remain (810). When the top left score of the current pixel exceeds the top left score threshold, the processing circuitry 112 may set the current pixel as the top left corner of the text chunk (820).
Continuing the boundary determination for a text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a top right pixel for the text chunk (822) through any of the methods or techniques described above. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a set of top right candidate pixels from the image, and identify the top right corner of the text chunk as the pixel from among the top right candidate pixels with the highest top right score (e.g., the pixel most likely to correspond to the top right corner or a text character as specified by top right score). The processing circuitry 112 may also determine the bottom edge of the text chunk (824) through any of the processes and techniques described above.
The processing circuitry 112 may further adjust the boundaries of a text chunk. In some variations, the processing circuitry 112 determines one or more chunk extensions (826) through which to extend the left edge or right edge (or both) of a text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may additionally or alternatively pad the text chunk with white pixels, for example as specified by padding parameter(s) in the character count parameters 124. Using any combination of the techniques, process, or steps described above, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a text chunk.
Upon determining a text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may validate the text chunk (830). As an exemplary validation, the processing circuitry 112 may determine whether the height of text chunk (e.g., pixel height) exceeds a minimum height threshold (e.g., 10 pixels). As another example, the processing circuitry may determine whether the height of the text chunk is within a maximum height threshold (e.g., 50 pixels). In some variations, the processing circuitry 112 may validate that all (or a threshold percentage) of the pixels in the text chunk are not a part of another determined text chunk. In these variations, the processing circuitry 112 may access a listing of previously determined text chunks to determine whether pixels of the text chunk belong to any of the previously determined text chunks. When the text chunk passes the validation process, the processing circuitry 112 may store the text chunk (832), e.g., by storing an indication of the text chunk in the determined text chunk listing. The indication may, for example, take the form of a database or data structure entry and may specify the boundary and/or pixels belonging to the associated text chunk. Then, the processing circuitry 112 may consider the subsequent pixel of the image or interest region, if any remain (810). When the text chunk fails the validation, the processing circuitry 112 may discard the text chunk and not store the text chunk in the determined text chunk listing. That is, the processing circuitry 112 may proceed to consider the subsequent pixel of the image or interest region (810) without storing an indication of the text chunk.
Determining Character Count
After identifying text chunks in an image, e.g., a financial document image 200, the processing circuitry 112 may determine a character count for the text chunks. As described in greater detail below, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the character count for a text chunk without specifically recognizing the identity or content of any particular text characters in the text chunk. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may determine the character count for the text chunk without performing any character recognition techniques, such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) or other similar character recognition techniques.
The processing circuitry 112 may process the text chunk 710 to determine a character start column and a corresponding character end column. To do so, the processing circuitry 112 may start at the leftmost pixel column of the text chunk and sequentially consider pixel columns in text chunk 710. The processing circuitry 112 may identify a character start column when the number of black pixels in a current column exceeds a black column threshold, which may be specified in the character count parameters 124 as a number of pixels or percentage, for example. In the specific example shown in
Upon identifying a character start column, the processing circuitry 112 may continue to sequentially consider pixel columns to the left of the character start column to identify a corresponding character end column. The processing circuitry 112 may identify the corresponding character end column as the first pixel column to the right of the character start column with white pixels that exceed a white column threshold. The processing circuitry 112 may identify a character end column when a current pixel column has less than 2 black pixels, for example. As seen in the exemplary text chunk 910 in
The processing circuitry 112 may read the character count parameters 124 (1002) and obtain a text chunk (1004). In some implementations, the processing circuitry 112 may obtain the chunk by accessing a text chunk listing or data structure, which may provide, for example, an indication of the boundaries of a particular text chunk in an image. The text chunk may be in the form of a pixel array.
In determining a character count for a text chunk, the processing circuitry 112 may process one or more pixel columns in the text chunk. The processing circuitry 112 may determine a character start column in the text chunk and then a corresponding character end column. To do so, the processing circuitry 112 may process the pixel columns in the chunk in according to a pixel column processing ordering. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may process pixel columns in the text chunk in a sequential order from the left most pixel column to the right most pixel column. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may determine whether any additional pixel columns in the text chunk remain for processing (1006). If so, the processing circuitry 112 may set the next pixel column in the pixel column processing ordering as the current column for determining a character start column (1008).
The processing circuitry 112 may identify a character start column when a current pixel column meets any number of character start column criteria. The processing circuitry 112 may identify a character start column based on a black column threshold, which may specify a percentage, proportion, or number of black pixels in a pixel column. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may identify a character start column by determining whether the number or proportion of black pixels in the current pixel column exceeds a black column threshold (1010). If not, the processing circuitry 112 may consider the next pixel column in the text chunk for determining a character start column, if any remain (1006). When the number or proportion of black pixels in the current pixel column exceeds the black column threshold, the processing circuitry 112 identifies this particular pixel column as a character start column (1012).
The processing circuitry 112 may determine a corresponding character end column for the identified character start column. After identifying the character start column, the processing circuitry 112 may consider the next pixel column in the text chunk, if any remain (1014). If so, the processing circuitry 112 may set the next pixel column as the current column for determining a character end column (1016). The processing circuitry 112 may identify a character end column when a current pixel column meets any number of character end column criteria. In particular, the processing circuitry 112 may, for example, identify a character end column by determining whether the number or proportion of white pixels in the current pixel column exceeds a white column threshold (1018). If not, the processing circuitry 112 may consider the next pixel column in the text chunk for determining a character end column, if any remain (1014).
When the number or proportion of white pixels in the current pixel column exceeds the white column threshold, the processing circuitry 112 identifies this particular pixel column as a corresponding character end column to the previously determined character start column (1020). The processing circuitry 112 may increment a counter indicating the character count for the text chunk.
The processing circuitry 112 may continue processing the text chunk to determine character start columns and corresponding character end columns until no additional pixel columns remain (1006 or 1014). Then, the processing circuitry 112 may obtain the character count for the text chunk by reading the counter indicating the character count for the text chunk (1022).
The processing circuitry 112 may read the character count parameters 124 (1102) and receive a financial document image 200 (1104). In some implementations, the character count parameters 124 may specify a character count threshold for the financial document image 200. The character count threshold may specify a minimum or maximum threshold number of characters in a financial document image 200 to meet particular quality criteria for processing the financial document image 200. Additionally, the character count parameters 124 may specify a particular character count threshold for different types of images, such as specific character count thresholds for business checks, personal checks, financial forms, remittance coupons, etc. As illustrative examples, the character count threshold for a business check may be set to 50 characters for personal checks and 100 characters for business checks. The character count parameters 124 may additionally or alternatively specify a particular character count threshold for particular regions (e.g., interest regions) of the financial document image 200 or any other image type the processing circuitry 112 may process.
The processing circuitry 112 may optionally perform image pre-processing techniques on the financial document image 200 (1106), including any of the pre-processing techniques described above. The processing circuitry 112 may determine a character count for the financial document image 200, for example by identifying one or more text chunks in the financial document image 200 (1008) and determining a character count for one or more of the identified text chunks (1110). To do so, the processing circuitry 112 may utilize any combination of the methods, flows, and techniques described above. The processing circuitry 112 may determine a character count for the financial document image 200 by summing the determined character count of text chunks in the financial document image 200.
The processing circuitry 112 may determine whether the character count for the financial document image 200 meets the character count criteria (1112). When the character count for the financial document image 200 fails the character count criteria, the processing circuitry 112 may instruct recapture of the financial document image (1114). For example, the processing circuitry 112 may send an image rejection message to an electronic device 102 used to capture the financial document image 200. The image rejection message may further instruct a user to recapture the image of financial document.
When the character count for the financial document image 200 meets the character count criteria, the processing circuitry 112 may perform further image processing. For example, the processing circuitry 112 may perform character recognition (e.g., OCR) on the financial document image 200 to recognize the characters on the financial document image 200. The processing circuitry 112 may perform further processing after character recognition, such as initiating a deposit process of a check represented by the financial document image 200, processing of a medical bill or financial form, etc.
The character count criteria may serve as an initial quality screen for incoming images received by the processing circuitry 112. By determining the character count of an image prior to performing subsequent image processing, the processing circuitry 112 may determine that the image is not overly cropped, and thus containing a character count less than a minimum threshold. Similarly, the character count criteria may be configured to prevent processing of overly blurry images, e.g., blurry images such that the processing circuitry 112 cannot determine enough character start and end columns and resulting in a character count less than a minimum threshold.
As discussed above, the character count parameters 124 may specify particular character count thresholds for interest regions of an image. Accordingly, the processing circuitry 112 may specifically identify text chunks and determine character counts for these interest regions instead of for the entire image. The processing circuitry 112 may determine the image passes the character count criteria when some or all of the particular character count criteria for the determined interest regions are met. As one example, the processing circuitry 112 may identify a MICR line portion of a check image as an interest region, and apply particular character count criteria for the MICR line portion, e.g., a minimum character count threshold. Additional exemplary interest regions may include high priority fields of a document, such as a social security number field, name field, address field, courtesy amount field, or any high priority region of an image received by the processing circuitry.
By performing combinations of the methods and techniques described above, the processing circuitry 112 may identify the character count for a financial document image 200 or other image without recognizing any particular character in the financial document image 200.
Although the example of a financial document 200 such as a check is provided by way of example above, the techniques discussed for identifying the presence, but not the specific identity or literal meaning, of characters or words, may be applied to any type of document. Other documents that may be analyzed with the techniques described herein include receipts, insurance documents, coupons, and so on. Specific portions of these documents may be targeted, or only characters of a particular font size may be included, for a given type of document. An advantage of the techniques discussed above is that the processing power and time for recognizing the presence, but not the specific identity, of characters or words may be less than that needed for actually identifying the individual letter, number or symbol. In other words, the knowledge that the captured image has chunks of text with a likelihood of four characters may be used rather than identifying those four characters as “abc3’ can provide a helpful filter for a system to determine if an expected type of document is being looked at. In this way, a system may quickly, and with less processing power, filter out unacceptable (e.g., overly cropped or blurry) documents.
In some implementations, an image processing system 104 may implement the processing circuitry 112 for performing any of the methods and techniques described above, including determining a character count for a financial document image 200 without recognizing any particular character in the financial document image 200. In other implementations, an electronic device 102, such as a mobile device, may implement the processing circuitry 112. In yet other implementations, the functionality of the processing circuitry 112 may be implemented, e.g., distributed, through a combination of the image processing system 104 and electronic device 102.
The methods, devices, and logic described above may be implemented in many different ways in many different combinations of hardware, software or both hardware and software. For example, all or parts of the system may include circuitry in a controller, a microprocessor, or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or may be implemented with discrete logic or components, or a combination of other types of analog or digital circuitry, combined on a single integrated circuit or distributed among multiple integrated circuits. All or part of the logic described above may be implemented as instructions for execution by a processor, controller, or other processing device and may be stored in a tangible or non-transitory machine-readable or computer-readable medium such as flash memory, random access memory (RAM) or read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM) or other machine-readable medium such as a compact disc read only memory (CDROM), or magnetic or optical disk. Thus, a product, such as a computer program product, may include a storage medium and computer readable instructions stored on the medium, which when executed in an endpoint, computer system, or other device, cause the device to perform operations according to any of the description above.
The processing capability described above may be distributed among multiple system components, such as among multiple processors and memories, optionally including multiple distributed processing systems. Parameters, databases, and other data structures may be separately stored and managed, may be incorporated into a single memory or database, may be logically and physically organized in many different ways, and may implemented in many ways, including data structures such as linked lists, hash tables, or implicit storage mechanisms. Programs may be parts (e.g., subroutines) of a single program, separate programs, distributed across several memories and processors, or implemented in many different ways, such as in a library, such as a shared library (e.g., a dynamic link library (DLL)). The DLL, for example, may store code that performs any of the system processing described above. While various embodiments of the systems and methods have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of the systems and methods. Accordingly, the systems and methods are not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/014,918, filed on Feb. 3, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/056,565 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,286,514 issued on Mar. 15, 2016), filed on Oct. 17, 2013, the entirety of all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1748489 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 1930 | A |
2292825 | Dilks et al. | Aug 1942 | A |
3005282 | Christiansen | Oct 1961 | A |
3341820 | Grillmeier, Jr. et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3576972 | Wood | May 1971 | A |
3593913 | Bremer | Jul 1971 | A |
3620553 | Donovan | Nov 1971 | A |
3648242 | Grosbard | Mar 1972 | A |
3800124 | Walsh | Mar 1974 | A |
3816943 | Henry | Jun 1974 | A |
4002356 | Weidmann | Jan 1977 | A |
4027142 | Paup et al. | May 1977 | A |
4060711 | Buros | Nov 1977 | A |
4070649 | Wright, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4128202 | Buros | Dec 1978 | A |
4136471 | Austin | Jan 1979 | A |
4205780 | Burns | Jun 1980 | A |
4264808 | Owens | Apr 1981 | A |
4305216 | Skelton | Dec 1981 | A |
4321672 | Braun | Mar 1982 | A |
4346442 | Musmanno | Aug 1982 | A |
4417136 | Rushby et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4433436 | Carnes | Feb 1984 | A |
4454610 | Sziklai | Jun 1984 | A |
RE31692 | Tyburski et al. | Oct 1984 | E |
4523330 | Cain | Jun 1985 | A |
4636099 | Goldston | Jan 1987 | A |
4640413 | Kaplan | Feb 1987 | A |
4644144 | Chandek | Feb 1987 | A |
4722444 | Murphy et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4722544 | Weber | Feb 1988 | A |
4727435 | Otani et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4737911 | Freeman | Apr 1988 | A |
4739411 | Bolton | Apr 1988 | A |
4774574 | Daly et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4774663 | Musmanno | Sep 1988 | A |
4790475 | Griffin | Dec 1988 | A |
4806780 | Yamamoto | Feb 1989 | A |
4837693 | Schotz | Jun 1989 | A |
4890228 | Longfield | Dec 1989 | A |
4927071 | Wood | May 1990 | A |
4934587 | McNabb | Jun 1990 | A |
4960981 | Benton | Oct 1990 | A |
4975735 | Bright | Dec 1990 | A |
5022683 | Barbour | Jun 1991 | A |
5053607 | Carlson | Oct 1991 | A |
5077805 | Tan | Dec 1991 | A |
5091968 | Higgins et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5122950 | Benton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5134564 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5146606 | Grondalski | Sep 1992 | A |
5157620 | Shaar | Oct 1992 | A |
5159548 | Caslavka | Oct 1992 | A |
5164833 | Aoki | Nov 1992 | A |
5175682 | Higashiyama et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5187750 | Behera | Feb 1993 | A |
5191525 | LeBrun | Mar 1993 | A |
5193121 | Elischer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5220501 | Lawlor | Jun 1993 | A |
5227863 | Bilbrey et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229589 | Schneider | Jul 1993 | A |
5233547 | Kapp et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237158 | Kern et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237159 | Stephens | Aug 1993 | A |
5237620 | Deaton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5257320 | Etherington et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265008 | Benton | Nov 1993 | A |
5268968 | Yoshida | Dec 1993 | A |
5283829 | Anderson | Feb 1994 | A |
5321816 | Rogan | Jun 1994 | A |
5345090 | Hludzinski | Sep 1994 | A |
5347302 | Simonoff | Sep 1994 | A |
5350906 | Brody | Sep 1994 | A |
5373550 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383113 | Kight et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5419588 | Wood | May 1995 | A |
5422467 | Graef | Jun 1995 | A |
5444616 | Nair et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444794 | Uhland, Sr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455875 | Chevion et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5475403 | Havlovick et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5504538 | Tsujihara | Apr 1996 | A |
5504677 | Pollin | Apr 1996 | A |
5528387 | Kelly et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530773 | Thompson | Jun 1996 | A |
5577179 | Blank | Nov 1996 | A |
5583759 | Geer | Dec 1996 | A |
5590196 | Moreau | Dec 1996 | A |
5594225 | Botvin | Jan 1997 | A |
5598969 | Ong | Feb 1997 | A |
5602936 | Green | Feb 1997 | A |
5610726 | Nonoshita | Mar 1997 | A |
5611028 | Shibasaki | Mar 1997 | A |
5630073 | Nolan | May 1997 | A |
5631984 | Graf et al. | May 1997 | A |
5668897 | Stolfo | Sep 1997 | A |
5673320 | Ray et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677955 | Doggett | Oct 1997 | A |
5678046 | Cahill et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679938 | Templeton | Oct 1997 | A |
5680611 | Rail | Oct 1997 | A |
5691524 | Josephson | Nov 1997 | A |
5699452 | Vaidyanathan | Dec 1997 | A |
5734747 | Vaidyanathan | Mar 1998 | A |
5737440 | Kunkler | Apr 1998 | A |
5748780 | Stolfo | May 1998 | A |
5751842 | Riach | May 1998 | A |
5761686 | Bloomberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5784503 | Bleecker, III et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5830609 | Warner | Nov 1998 | A |
5832463 | Funk | Nov 1998 | A |
5838814 | Moore | Nov 1998 | A |
5848185 | Koga et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859935 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863075 | Rich | Jan 1999 | A |
5870456 | Rogers | Feb 1999 | A |
5870724 | Lawlor | Feb 1999 | A |
5870725 | Bellinger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878337 | Joao | Mar 1999 | A |
5889884 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893101 | Balogh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897625 | Gustin | Apr 1999 | A |
5898157 | Mangili et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901253 | Tretter | May 1999 | A |
5903878 | Talati | May 1999 | A |
5903881 | Schrader | May 1999 | A |
5910988 | Ballard | Jun 1999 | A |
5917931 | Kunkler | Jun 1999 | A |
5924737 | Schrupp | Jul 1999 | A |
5926548 | Okamoto | Jul 1999 | A |
5930778 | Geer | Jul 1999 | A |
5937396 | Konya | Aug 1999 | A |
5940844 | Cahill | Aug 1999 | A |
5982918 | Mennie | Nov 1999 | A |
5987439 | Gustin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012048 | Gustin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014454 | Kunkler | Jan 2000 | A |
6021202 | Anderson | Feb 2000 | A |
6021397 | Jones | Feb 2000 | A |
6029887 | Furuhashi | Feb 2000 | A |
6030000 | Diamond | Feb 2000 | A |
6032137 | Ballard | Feb 2000 | A |
6038553 | Hyde | Mar 2000 | A |
6053405 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059185 | Funk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064762 | Haenel | May 2000 | A |
6072941 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073119 | Bornemisza-wahr | Jun 2000 | A |
6073121 | Ramzy | Jun 2000 | A |
6085168 | Mori | Jul 2000 | A |
6086708 | Colgate | Jul 2000 | A |
6089450 | Koeple | Jul 2000 | A |
6089610 | Greene | Jul 2000 | A |
6092047 | Hyman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097834 | Krouse | Aug 2000 | A |
6097845 | Ng et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097885 | Rayner | Aug 2000 | A |
6105865 | Hardesty | Aug 2000 | A |
6128603 | Dent et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141339 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145738 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148102 | Stolin | Nov 2000 | A |
6149056 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151409 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151423 | Melen | Nov 2000 | A |
6151426 | Lee | Nov 2000 | A |
6159585 | Rittenhouse | Dec 2000 | A |
6170744 | Lee | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178409 | Weber et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181837 | Cahill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188506 | Kaiserman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189785 | Lowery | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192165 | Irons | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195694 | Chen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199055 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236009 | Emigh et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243689 | Norton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278983 | Ball | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282523 | Tedesco et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282826 | Richards | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293469 | Masson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304860 | Martin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310647 | Parulski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314452 | Dekel | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317727 | May | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328207 | Gregoire et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339658 | Moccagatta | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339766 | Gephart | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351553 | Hayosh | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351735 | Deaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354490 | Weiss et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363162 | Moed et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6390362 | Martin | May 2002 | B1 |
6397196 | Kravetz | May 2002 | B1 |
6408084 | Foley | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411737 | Wesolkowski et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6411938 | Gates et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413305 | Mehta | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417869 | Do | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425017 | Dievendorff | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429952 | Olbricht | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439454 | Masson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449397 | Che-chu | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450403 | Martens et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463220 | Dance et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464134 | Page | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469745 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470325 | Leemhuis | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473519 | Pidhirny et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502747 | Stoutenburg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505178 | Flenley | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546119 | Ciolli et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574377 | Cahill et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574609 | Downs | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578760 | Otto | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587837 | Spagna | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606117 | Windle | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609200 | Anderson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611598 | Hayosh | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614930 | Agnihotri et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643416 | Daniels | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647136 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654487 | Downs, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669086 | Abdi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672452 | Alves | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682452 | Quintus | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695204 | Stinson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711474 | Treyz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726097 | Graef | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728397 | Mcneal | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738496 | Van Hall | May 2004 | B1 |
6742128 | Joiner | May 2004 | B1 |
6745186 | Testa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754640 | Bozeman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755340 | Voss et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760414 | Schurko et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6760470 | Bogosian et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763226 | McZeal | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781962 | Williams | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6786398 | Stinson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6789054 | Makhlouf | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6796489 | Slater et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796491 | Nakajima | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806903 | Okisu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807294 | Yamazaki | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813733 | Li | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829704 | Zhang | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844885 | Anderson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856965 | Stinson | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6863214 | Garner et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870947 | Kelland | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873728 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883140 | Acker | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898314 | Kung et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902105 | Koakutsu | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910023 | Schibi | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6913188 | Wong | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931255 | Mekuria | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931591 | Brown | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934719 | Nally | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947610 | Sun | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957770 | Robinson | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961689 | Greenberg | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970843 | Forte | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973589 | Wright | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983886 | Natsukari et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993507 | Meyer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996263 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999943 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003040 | Yi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004382 | Sandru | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010155 | Koakutsu et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010507 | Anderson | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016704 | Pallakoff | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027171 | Watanabe | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028886 | Maloney | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039048 | Monta | May 2006 | B1 |
7051001 | Slater | May 2006 | B1 |
7058036 | Yu | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062099 | Li et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062456 | Riehl et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062768 | Kubo | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072862 | Wilson | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076458 | Lawlor et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086003 | Demsky | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092561 | Downs, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104443 | Paul et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113925 | Waserstein | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114649 | Nelson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116446 | Maurer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117171 | Pollin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120461 | Cho | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131571 | Swift et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139594 | Nagatomo | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140539 | Crews | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7163347 | Lugg | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178721 | Maloney | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181430 | Buchanan et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184980 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185805 | McShirley | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197173 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200255 | Jones | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204412 | Foss, Jr. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216106 | Buchanan | May 2007 | B1 |
7219082 | Forte | May 2007 | B2 |
7219831 | Murata | May 2007 | B2 |
7245765 | Myers et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249076 | Pendleton | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7252224 | Verma | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257246 | Brodie et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7266230 | Doran | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277191 | Metcalfe et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290034 | Budd | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299970 | Ching | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299979 | Phillips | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313543 | Crane | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7314163 | Crews et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321874 | Dilip | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321875 | Dilip | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325725 | Foss, Jr. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7328190 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330604 | Wu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331523 | Meier et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336813 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343320 | Treyz | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349566 | Jones et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349585 | Li | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356505 | March | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369713 | Suino | May 2008 | B2 |
7377425 | Ma | May 2008 | B1 |
7379978 | Anderson | May 2008 | B2 |
7383227 | Weinflash et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385631 | Maeno | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386511 | Buchanan | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388683 | Rodriguez et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391897 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391934 | Goodall et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392935 | Byrne | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401048 | Rosedale | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403917 | Larsen | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7406198 | Aoki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419093 | Blackson et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7421107 | Lugg | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7421410 | Schechtman et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7427016 | Chimento | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433098 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437327 | Lam | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440924 | Buchanan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447347 | Weber | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455220 | Phillips | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455221 | Sheaffer | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460108 | Tamura | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7461779 | Ramachandran | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7461780 | Potts | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7464859 | Hawkins | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7471818 | Price | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475040 | Buchanan | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477923 | Wallmark | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480382 | Dunbar | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480422 | Ackley et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489953 | Griffin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490242 | Torres | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497429 | Reynders | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503486 | Ahles | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505759 | Rahman | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7506261 | Statou | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509287 | Nutahara | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512564 | Geer | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519560 | Lam | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520420 | Phillips | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520422 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536354 | deGroeve et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7536440 | Budd | May 2009 | B2 |
7539646 | Gilder | May 2009 | B2 |
7540408 | Levine | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7542598 | Jones | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7545529 | Borrey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548641 | Gilson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566002 | Love et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571848 | Cohen | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577614 | Warren et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7587066 | Cordery et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587363 | Cataline | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590275 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599543 | Jones | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599888 | Manfre | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602956 | Jones | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606762 | Heit | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609873 | Foth et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609889 | Guo et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619721 | Jones | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620231 | Jones | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620604 | Bueche, Jr. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630518 | Frew et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644037 | Ostrovsky | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7644043 | Minowa | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647275 | Jones | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668363 | Price | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672022 | Fan | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7672940 | Viola | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676409 | Ahmad | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7680732 | Davies et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7680735 | Loy | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689482 | Lam | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697776 | Wu et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698222 | Bueche, Jr. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702588 | Gilder | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7714778 | Dupray | May 2010 | B2 |
7720735 | Anderson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734545 | Fogliano | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7743979 | Fredman | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753268 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7761358 | Craig et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766244 | Field | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7769650 | Bleunven | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772685 | Oakes, III et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778457 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792752 | Kay | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7792753 | Slater et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7810714 | Murata | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812986 | Graham et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818245 | Prakash et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831458 | Neumann | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7856402 | Kay | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865384 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873200 | Oakes, III et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7876949 | Oakes, III et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7885451 | Walls et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7885880 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7894094 | Nacman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895054 | Slen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896232 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7900822 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7903863 | Jones et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904386 | Kalra et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912785 | Kay | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7935441 | Tononishi | May 2011 | B2 |
7949587 | Morris et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7950698 | Popadic et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953441 | Lors | May 2011 | B2 |
7958053 | Stone | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962411 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7970677 | Oakes, III et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7974899 | Prasad et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7978900 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979326 | Kurushima | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996312 | Beck et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7996314 | Smith et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7996315 | Smith et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7996316 | Smith et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8001051 | Smith et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8045784 | Price et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046301 | Smith et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8060442 | Hecht et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065307 | Haslam et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091778 | Block et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8116533 | Kiplinger et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8159520 | Dhanoa | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8203640 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204293 | Csulits et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8235284 | Prasad et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8266076 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271385 | Emerson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8290237 | Burks et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8320657 | Burks et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8332329 | Thiele | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8351677 | Oakes, III et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8351678 | Medina, III | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8358826 | Medina et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8364563 | Choiniere, Sr. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369650 | Zanfir et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374963 | Billman | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391599 | Medina, III | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8392332 | Oakes,III et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8401962 | Bent et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8422758 | Bueche, Jr. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433127 | Harpel et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433647 | Yarbrough | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8452689 | Medina, III | May 2013 | B1 |
8464933 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8538124 | Harpel et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8542921 | Medina | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8548267 | Yacoub et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559766 | Tilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8582862 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611635 | Medina, III | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8660952 | Viera et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8708227 | Oakes, III et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8731321 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732081 | Oakes, III et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8751345 | Borzych et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8751356 | Garcia | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8751379 | Bueche, Jr. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8799147 | Walls et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8837806 | Ethington et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8843405 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8950033 | Oakes, III et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8977571 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990862 | Smith | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9009071 | Watson et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9036040 | Danko | May 2015 | B1 |
9058512 | Medina, III | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9064284 | Janiszeski et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9129340 | Medina, III et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9159101 | Pollack et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9177197 | Prasad et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9177198 | Prasad et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9224136 | Oakes, III et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9286514 | Newman | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9311634 | Hildebrand | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9336517 | Prasad et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9390339 | Danko | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9401011 | Medina, III et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424569 | Sherman et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9569756 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9619872 | Medina, III et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9626183 | Smith et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9626662 | Prasad et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9779392 | Prasad et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9779452 | Medina et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9785929 | Watson et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9792654 | Limas et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9818090 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9872454 | Pollack et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9886642 | Danko | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9898778 | Pollack et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9898808 | Medina, III et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9904848 | Newman | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9946923 | Medina | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10181087 | Danko | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10235660 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
20010004235 | Maloney | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010014881 | Drummond | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016084 | Pollard et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018739 | Anderson | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027994 | Hayashida | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037299 | Nichols et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042171 | Vermeulen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042785 | Walker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043748 | Wesolkowski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047330 | Gephart | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054020 | Barth et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001393 | Jones | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013767 | Katz | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020169715 | Ruth et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016763 | March | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016769 | Barbara et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023055 | Antognini et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025085 | Gustafson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026418 | Koppel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032656 | Chen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038289 | Lawlor et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040340 | Yoshida | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052841 | Guthrie | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052853 | Munoz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065786 | Martens et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072974 | Pugliese | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075524 | Blair | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084321 | Martens | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087467 | Mascavage, III et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107767 | McClair et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107809 | Biddle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116329 | Serbetcioglu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116335 | Star | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118891 | Rudd | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120562 | Opiela | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120582 | Elston et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120846 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129249 | Maillard et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130868 | Smith | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133409 | Sawano et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138445 | Laage et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138522 | Muralidhar | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147798 | Huang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150279 | Scott | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150311 | Lynn | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152160 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152161 | Aoike | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152164 | Dutta | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152165 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152169 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152170 | Dutta | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153414 | Stoutenburg et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154127 | Vienneau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159648 | Alderson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171820 | Okamura | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178112 | Goeller | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186881 | Li | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188564 | Star | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195485 | Pomerleau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005326 | Flemming | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009420 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015583 | Abdi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018897 | Bellis, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023557 | Moore | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026609 | Parulski | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038227 | Sesek | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050889 | Burke | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053692 | Hong et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055756 | Allan | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055776 | Samuelson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072568 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074315 | Lam | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075596 | Koakutsu | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075916 | Gorski | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078883 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081824 | Mennie | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086615 | Dance et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093367 | Allen-Rouman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093369 | Ijichi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105688 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105714 | Alarcon-Luther et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126078 | Vihinen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126082 | Omura et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130940 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132384 | Sugiyama et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133608 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133610 | Nagarajan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135457 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139999 | Rowe | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159046 | Choi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167225 | Adams | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187790 | Swift et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191615 | Bailey | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191869 | Williams | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200107 | Allen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200174 | Star | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212904 | Randle et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217005 | Drummond et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218061 | Filatov | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225705 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233278 | Marshall | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233318 | King et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010466 | Anderson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012496 | De Souza | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013284 | Yu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017482 | Weitman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024626 | Bruijning | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024708 | Masuda | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029591 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030741 | Wolton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044606 | Buttridge et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057697 | Renzi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058705 | Morgan | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066031 | Wong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069841 | Wong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071333 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075754 | Nakajima et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076320 | Downs, Jr. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078299 | Down-Logan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080795 | Bean et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089711 | Sandru | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093303 | Picciallo | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093305 | Kight | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103057 | Melbert et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103296 | Harp | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109596 | Doran | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040110975 | Osinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111371 | Friedman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117302 | Weichert | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122754 | Stevens | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133511 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138974 | Shimamura | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148235 | Craig et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158549 | Matena | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165096 | Maeno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170259 | Park | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184766 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201741 | Ban | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210515 | Hughes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210523 | Gains et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225604 | Foss, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228277 | Williams | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236647 | Acharya | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236688 | Bozeman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240722 | Tsuji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040245324 | Chen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247199 | Murai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040248600 | Kim | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252679 | Williams | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260636 | Marceau | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267666 | Minami | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001421 | Luth et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010108 | Rahn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015332 | Chen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015342 | Murata et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021466 | Buchanan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030388 | Stavely et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033645 | Duphily | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033685 | Reyes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033690 | Antognini et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033695 | Minowa | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035193 | Gustin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038746 | Latimer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038754 | Geist | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044042 | Mendiola | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044577 | Jerding | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049950 | Johnson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071283 | Randle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075969 | Nielson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075974 | Turgeon | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077351 | De Jong | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078336 | Ferlitsch | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080725 | Pick | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082364 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086140 | Ireland | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086168 | Alvarez | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089209 | Stefanuk | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091161 | Gustin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096992 | Geisel | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097019 | Jacobs | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097046 | Singfield | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097050 | Orcutt | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108164 | Salafia | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108168 | Halpin | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115110 | Dinkins | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125338 | Tidwell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125360 | Tidwell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050127160 | Fujikawa | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131820 | Rodriguez | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143136 | Lev et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149436 | Elterich | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168566 | Tada | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171899 | Dunn | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171907 | Lewis | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177494 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177499 | Thomas | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177510 | Hilt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177518 | Brown | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182710 | Anderson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188306 | Mackenzie | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203430 | Williams et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205661 | Taylor | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209961 | Michelsen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213805 | Blake et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216410 | Davis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218209 | Heilper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220324 | Klein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228733 | Bent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244035 | Klein et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252955 | Sugai | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267843 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268107 | Harris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269412 | Chiu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273368 | Hutten et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278250 | Zair | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281448 | Lugg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281471 | LeConte | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281474 | Huang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289030 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289059 | Brewington et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289182 | Pandian et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002426 | Madour | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004660 | Pranger | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015450 | Guck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015733 | O'Malley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017752 | Kurzweil et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025697 | Kurzweil | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039628 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039629 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041506 | Mason et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045321 | Yu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060045374 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060045379 | Heaney, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047593 | Naratil | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049242 | Mejias et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053056 | Alspach-Goss | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059085 | Tucker | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064368 | Forte | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080245 | Bahl | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085357 | Pizarro | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085516 | Farr et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102704 | Reynders | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106691 | Sheaffer | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106717 | Randle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108168 | Fischer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110063 | Weiss | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112013 | Maloney | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115110 | Rodriguez | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115141 | Koakutsu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060118613 | McMann | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124730 | Maloney | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144924 | Stover | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060144937 | Heilper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060144950 | Johnson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159367 | Zeineh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161499 | Rich et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161501 | Waserstein | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164682 | Lev | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166178 | Driedijk | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167818 | Wentker et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060181614 | Yen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182331 | Gilson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182332 | Weber | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186194 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202014 | VanKirk et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206506 | Fitzpatrick | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060208059 | Cable et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210138 | Hilton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212391 | Norman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212393 | Brown | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214940 | Kinoshita | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215204 | Miyamoto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215230 | Borrey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221198 | Fry et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060222260 | Sambongi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229976 | Jung | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229986 | Corder | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238503 | Smith | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242062 | Peterson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242063 | Peterson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249567 | Byrne | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274164 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279628 | Fleming | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282383 | Doran | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291744 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002157 | Shintani et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013721 | Vau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016796 | Singhal | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019243 | Sato | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022053 | Waserstein | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027802 | VanDeburg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030357 | Levien et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031022 | Frew | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038561 | Vancini et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041629 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050292 | Yarbrough | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053574 | Verma et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058851 | Quine | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063016 | Myatt | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064991 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065143 | Didow et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075772 | Kokubo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076940 | Goodall et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076941 | Carreon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077921 | Hayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080207 | Williams | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082700 | Landschaft | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084911 | Crowell | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086642 | Foth | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086643 | Spier | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094088 | Mastie | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094140 | Riney et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100748 | Dheer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110277 | Hayduchok et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118472 | Allen-Rouman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122024 | Haas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124241 | Newton | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127805 | Foth et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129955 | Dalmia | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070131758 | Mejias et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136198 | Foth et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138255 | Carreon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140545 | Rossignoli | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140594 | Franklin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143208 | Varga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150337 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154098 | Geva et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156438 | Popadic et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168265 | Rosenberger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168283 | Alvarez et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171288 | Inoue | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172107 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172148 | Hawley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175977 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179883 | Questembert | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183000 | Eisen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183741 | Lerman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194102 | Cohen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198432 | Pitroda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203708 | Polycn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206877 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208816 | Baldwin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214086 | Homoki | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217669 | Swift et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233525 | Boyle | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233585 | Ben Simon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235518 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235520 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241179 | Davis | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244782 | Chimento | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246525 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251992 | Sharma et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255652 | Tumminaro | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255653 | Tumminaro | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255662 | Tumminaro | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258634 | Simonoff | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262137 | Brown | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262148 | Yoon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268540 | Gaspardo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271182 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278286 | Crowell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288380 | Starrs | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288382 | Narayanan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299928 | Kohli et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002911 | Eisen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010204 | Rackley, III et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021802 | Pendelton | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040280 | Davis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046362 | Easterly | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052182 | Marshall | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059376 | Davis | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063253 | Wood | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065524 | Matthews et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068674 | McIntyre | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071679 | Foley | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071721 | Wang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073423 | Heit et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080760 | Ronca | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086420 | Gilder et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086421 | Gilder et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086770 | Kulkarni et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091599 | Foss, Jr. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097899 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097907 | Till et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103790 | Abernethy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103967 | Ackert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113674 | Baig | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114739 | Hayes | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115066 | Pavley et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116257 | Fickling | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117991 | Peddireddy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119178 | Peddireddy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133411 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140579 | Sanjiv | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147549 | Ruthbun | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155672 | Sharma | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156438 | Stumphauzer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162319 | Breeden et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162350 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162371 | Rampell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177659 | Lacey et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180750 | Feldman | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205751 | Mischler | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208727 | McLaughlin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214180 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219543 | Csulits | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245869 | Berkun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247629 | Gilder | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247655 | Yano | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249931 | Gilder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249951 | Gilder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262950 | Christensen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262953 | Anderson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275821 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301441 | Calman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080304769 | Hollander et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316542 | Mindrum et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024520 | Drory et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046938 | Yoder | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060396 | Blessan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066987 | Inokuchi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076921 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094148 | Gilder et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108080 | Meyer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110281 | Hirabayashi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114716 | Ramachandran | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141962 | Borgia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164350 | Sorbe et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164370 | Sorbe et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166406 | Pigg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090167870 | Caleca et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171795 | Clouthier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171819 | Emde et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171825 | Roman | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173781 | Ramachadran | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185241 | Nepomniachtchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185737 | Nepomniachtchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185738 | Nepomniachtchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190823 | Walters | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192938 | Amos | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212929 | Drory et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236413 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240620 | Kendrick et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252437 | Li | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254447 | Blades | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257641 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263019 | Tzadok et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271287 | Halpern | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281904 | Pharris | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284637 | Parulski et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290751 | Ferman et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292628 | Dryer et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313167 | Dujari et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319425 | Tumminaro et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327129 | Collas et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100007899 | Lay | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027679 | Sunahara et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030687 | Panthaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047000 | Park et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057578 | Blair et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061446 | Hands et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078471 | Lin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082468 | Low et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082470 | Walach | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100165015 | Barkley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198733 | Gantman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225773 | Lee | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226559 | Najari et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100260408 | Prakash et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262522 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274693 | Bause et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312705 | Caruso et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016084 | Mundy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110069180 | Nijemcevic et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106675 | Perlman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112967 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110170740 | Coleman | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191161 | Dai | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110251956 | Cantley et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110280450 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285874 | Showering et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310442 | Popadic et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120045112 | Lundblad et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047070 | Pharris | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120062732 | Marman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089514 | Kraemling et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099792 | Chevion et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120185383 | Atsmon | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185388 | Pranger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120229872 | Dolev | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130021651 | Popadic et al. | Jan 2013 | A9 |
20130120595 | Roach et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130198071 | Jurss | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223721 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130297353 | Strange | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140067661 | Elischer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140236820 | Carlton et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150039528 | Minogue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150090782 | Dent | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 984 410 | Mar 2000 | EP |
20040076131 | Aug 2004 | KR |
WO 9837655 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 0161436 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2006075967 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006086768 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006136958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras: Exif Version 2.2,” Standard of Electronics and Information Technology Industries Associate, JEITA CP-3451, Technical Standardization Committee on AV & IT Storage Systems and Equipments, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, Apr. 2002 (154 pgs). |
Bills, Steve, “Automated Amount Scanning Is Trend in Remote-Deposit,” American Banker, New York, NY, Aug. 30, 2005, (3 pgs). |
Braun, Tim, “Camdesk—Towards Portable and Easy Document Capture,” Image Understanding and Pattern Recognition Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Technical Report, Mar. 29, 2005 (64 pgs). |
Doermann, David et al., “Progress in Camera-Based Document Image Analysis,” IEEE Computer Society, (ICDAR 2003) 2003 (11 pgs). |
Lampert, Christoph et al., “Oblivious Document Capture and Real-Time Retrieval,” International Workshop on Camera Based Document Analysis and Recognition (CBDAR), 2005 (8 pgs). |
Vaream, Craig, “Image Deposit Solutions: Emerging Solutions for More Efficient Check Processing,” JP Morgan Chase, Nov. 2005 (16 pgs). |
Wade, Will, “Early Debate on Remote-Capture Risk,” American Banker, New York, NY, May 26, 2004 (3 pgs). |
“Quicken Bill Pay”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007 at: <URL:http://quicken intuit.com/quicken-bill-pay-jhtml>, 2 pgs. |
“Start to Simplify with Check Imaging a Smarter Way to Bank”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007, at: <URL: http://www.midnatbank.com/Interne%20Banking/internet_Banking.html>, 3 pgs. |
Claims as filed Jan. 24, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/878,821 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 9, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,510 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 9, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/948,549 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/722,836 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 25, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,966 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/695,770 (7 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/709,071 (1 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/709,126 (1 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/709,143 (1 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,478 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed May 18, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/983,983 (3 pgs). |
Application as filed Jun. 25, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/861,164 (39 pgs). |
“Accept “Customer Not Present” Checks,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg). |
“Adjusting Brightness and Contrast”, www.eaglesoftware.com/adjustin.htm, retrieved on May 4, 2009 (4 pgs). |
“Best practices for producing quality digital image files,” Digital Images Guidelines, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40247/1/Images-Best_Practice.pdf, downloaded 2007 (2 pgs). |
“Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps_user_guide_005.html, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pgs). |
“Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 pgs). |
“Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check21/solutions.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs). |
“Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg). |
“Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pgs). |
“Customer Personalized Bank Checks and Address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web_pages/faq.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pgs). |
“Deposit Now: Quick Start User Guide,” BankServ, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office Form 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/directdepositapplication.pdf, Jul. 2007 (2 pgs). |
“Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pgs). |
“Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs). |
“Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker-vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pgs). |
“First Wireless Handheld Check and Credit Card Processing Solution Launched by Commericant®, MobileScape® 5000 Eliminates Bounced Checks, Enables Payments Everywhere,” Business Wire, Mar. 13, 2016, 3 pages. |
“Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www/bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-lc_faq_bymail, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pgs). |
“Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/dirdepform.pdf. Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pgs). |
“How to Digitally Deposit a Check Image”, Smart Money Daily, Copyright 2008 (5 pgs). |
“ImageNet Mobile Deposit Provides Convenient Check Deposit and Bill Pay to Mobile Consumers,” Miteksystems, 2008 (2 pgs). |
“It's the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inbky.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pgs). |
“Lesson 38—More Bank Transactions”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs). |
“Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pgs). |
“Mitek Systems Announces Mobile Deposit Application for Apple iPhone,” http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories/pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-01- . . . , Nov. 25, 2008 (2 pgs). |
“NOVA Enhances Electronic Check Service to Benefit Multi-Lane Retailers,” Business Wire, Nov. 28, 2006, 2 pages. |
“Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs). |
“Refractive index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pgs). |
“Remote check deposit is the answer to a company's banking problem,” Daily Breeze, Torrance, CA, Nov. 17, 2006, 2 pgs. |
“Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs). |
“Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp; Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg). |
“Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pgs). |
“SNB Check Capture: SmartClient User's Guide,” Nov. 2006, 21 pgs. |
“Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pgs). |
“Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon_rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pgs). |
“Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running_your business/businessbits/d908484987.brc, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs). |
“WallStreetGrapevine.com” Stocks on the Rise: JADG, BKYI, MITK; Mar. 3, 2008 (4 pgs). |
“What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html , Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs). |
Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 pg). |
Albrecht, W. Steve, “Check Kiting: Detection, Prosecution and Prevention,” The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Nov. 1, 1993 (6 pgs). |
Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs). |
Amber Avalona-Butler / Paraglide, “At Your Service: Best iPhone Apps for Military Lifestyle,” Jul. 9, 2010 (2 pgs). |
Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pgs). |
Aradhye, Hrishikesh B., “A Generic Method for Determining Up/Down Orientation of Text in Roman and Non-Roman Scripts,” Pattern Recognition Society, Dec. 13, 2014, 18 pages. |
Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs). |
Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform Payment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banker ev (42 pgs). |
Automated Merchant Systems, Inc., “Electronic Check Conversion,” http://www.automatedmerchant.com/electronic_check_conversion.cfm, 2006, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs). |
Bank Systems & Technology, Untitled Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml? articleID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pgs). |
BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pgs). |
BankServ, Product Overview, http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pgs). |
Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing, Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss 6, (4 pgs). |
BLM Technologies, “Case Study: Addressing Check 21 and RDC Error and Fraud Threats,” Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jun. 11, 2007, Retrieved from http://www.remotedepositcapture.com/News/june_11_2007.htm on Feb. 19, 2008 (5 pgs). |
Blue Mountain Consulting, from URL: www.bluemontainconsulting.com, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Apr. 26, 2006 (3 pgs). |
Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pgs). |
Bruene, Jim; “Check Free to Enable In-Home Remote Check Deposit for Consumers and Small Business”, NetBanker. Com, Financial Insite, Inc., http://www. netbanker.com/2008/02/checkfree_to_enableinhome_rem.html, Feb. 5, 2008 (3 pgs). |
Bruene, Jim; “Digital Federal Credit Union and Four Others Offer Consumer Remote Deposit Capture Through EasCorp”, NetBanker—Tracking Online Finance, www.netbanker.com/2008/04/digital_federal_credit_union_a.html, Apr. 13, 2008 (3 pgs). |
Bruno, M., “Instant Messaging,” Bank Technology News, Dec. 2002 (3 pgs). |
Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pgs). |
Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pgs). |
Carrubba, P. et al., “Remote Deposit Capture: A White Paper Addressing Regulatory, Operational and Risk Issues,” NetDeposit Inc., 2006 (11 pgs). |
Century Remote Deposit High-Speed Scanner User's Manual Release 2006, (Century Manual), Century Bank, 2006, (32 pgs). |
Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ . . . , May 23, 2008 (2 pgs). |
CNN.com/technology, “Scan, deposit checks from home”, www.cnn.com/2008ITECH/biztech/02/07/check.scanning.ap/index.html, Feb. 7, 2008 (3 pgs). |
Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures a New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbanker.com/btn_article.html?id=20050502YQ50FSYG (2 pgs). |
Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pgs). |
Creativepaymentsolutions.com, “Creative Payment Solutions—Websolution,” www.creativepaymentsolution.com/cps/financialservices/websolution/default.html , Copyright 2008, Creative Payment Solutions, Inc. (1 pg). |
Credit Union Journal, “The Ramifications of Remote Deposit Capture Success”, www.cuiournal.com/orintthis.html?id=20080411 EODZT57G, Apr. 14, 2008 (1 pg). |
Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 pg). |
Credit Union Management, “When You wish Upon an Imaging System . . . the Right Selection Process can be the Shining Star,” Credit Union Management, Aug. 1993, printed from the internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/227756409/14138420743684F7722/15?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (11 pgs). |
DCU Members Monthly—Jan. 2008, “PC Deposit—Deposit Checks from Home!”, http://www.mycreditunionnewsletter.com/dcu/01 08/page1. html, Copyright 2008 Digital Federal Credit Union (2 pgs). |
De Jesus, A. et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment: An educational overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing distributed check imaging and processing solutions,” Panini, 2004, pp. 1-22. |
De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pgs). |
Debello, James et al., “RDM and Mitek Systems to Provide Mobile Check Deposit,” Mitek Systems, Inc., San Diego, California and Waterloo, Ontario, (Feb. 24, 2009), 2 pgs. |
DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16pgs). |
Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Checks”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pgs). |
Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal for Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pgs). |
Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pgs). |
Doermann, David et al., “Progress in Camera-Based Document Image Analysis,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2003) 0/7695-1960-1/03, 2003 IEEE (11 pages). |
Duvall, Mel, “Remote Deposit Capture,” Baseline, vol. 1, Issue 70, Mar. 2007, 2 pgs. |
ECU Technologies, “Upost Remote Deposit Solution,” Retrieved from the internet https://www.eutechnologies.com/products/upost.html, downloaded 2009 (1 pg). |
EFT Network Unveils FAXTellerPlus, EFT Network, Inc., www.eftnetwork.com, Jan. 13, 2009 (2 pgs). |
ElectronicPaymentProviders, Inc., “FAQs: ACH/ARC, CheckVerification/Conversion/Guarantee, RCK Check Re-Presentment,” http://www.useapp.com/faq.htm, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs). |
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act effective Oct. 28, 2004: Bank No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org.initiatives/content/check21_content.html, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,873,200, as dated Dec. 2005 (20 pgs). |
Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 pg). |
Federal Reserve System, “12 CFR, Part 229 [Regulation CC;]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks,” Federal Registrar, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 1-50. |
Federal Reserve System, “Part IV, 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC;]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks; Final Rule,” Federal Registrar, vol. 69, No. 149, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 47290-47328. |
Fest, Glen., “Patently Unaware” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, Retrieved from the internet at URL:http://banktechnews.com/article.html?id=2006403T7612618 (5 pgs). |
Fidelity Information Services, “Strategic Vision Embraces Major Changes in Financial Services Solutions: Fidelity's long-term product strategy ushers in new era of application design and processing,” Insight, 2004, pp. 1-14. |
Fisher, Dan M., “Home Banking in the 21st Century: Remote Capture Has Gone Retail”, May 2008 (4 pgs). |
Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pgs). |
Garry, M., “Checking Options: Retailers face an evolving landscape for electronic check processing that will require them to choose among several scenarios,” Supermarket News, vol. 53, No. 49, 2005 (3 pgs). |
German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pgs). |
Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pgs). |
Gupta, Maya R. et al., “OCR binarization and image pre-processing for searching historical documents,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 389-397. |
Hale, J., “Picture this: Check 21 uses digital technology to speed check processing and shorten lag time,” Columbus Business First, http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2005/03/14focus1.html, downloaded 2007 (3 pgs). |
Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issue 43, (3 pgs). |
Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs). |
Herley, Cormac, “Efficient Inscribing of Noisy Rectangular Objects in Scanned Images,” 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 4 pages. |
Hildebrand, C. et al., “Electronic Money,” Oracle, http://www.oracle.com/oramag/profit/05-feb/p15financial.html, 2005, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (5 pgs). |
Hillebrand, G., “Questions and Answers About the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 'Check 21,” ConsumersUnion.org, http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm, Jul. 27, 2004, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (6 pgs). |
Iida, Jeanne, “The Back Office: Systems—Image Processing Rolls on as Banks ReapBenefits,” American Banker, Jul. 19, 1993, printed from the internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/292903245/14138420743684F7722/14?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (3 pgs). |
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg). |
Investment Systems Company, “Portfolio Accounting System,” 2000, pp. 1-32. |
JBC, “What is a MICR Line?,” eHow.com, retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_4684793_what-micr-line.html on May 4, 2009 (2 pgs). |
Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC; “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pgs). |
Kendrick, Kevin B., “Check Kiting, Float for Purposes of Profit,” Bank Security & Fraud Prevention, vol. 1, No. 2, 1994 (3 pgs). |
Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs). |
Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pgs). |
Kornai Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pgs). |
Levitin, Adam J., Remote Deposit Capture: A Legal and Transactional Overview, Banking Law Journal, p. 115, 2009 (RDC). |
Liang, Jian et al., Camera-Based Analysis of Text and Documents: A Survey, International Journal on Document Analysis and Recongition, Jun. 21, 2005, 21 pages. |
Luo, Xi-Peng et al., “Design and Implementation of a Card Reader Based on Build-In Camera,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004, 4 pages. |
Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is_n7_v47/ai_14466034/print, 1993 (2 pgs). |
Matthews, Deborah, “Advanced Technology Makes Remote Deposit Capture Less Risky,” Indiana Bankers Association, Apr. 2008 (2 pgs). |
Metro 1 Credit Union, “Remote Banking Services,” hltp://ww\\i.metro1cu.org/metro1cu/remote.html, downloaded Apr. 17, 2007 (4 pgs). |
Mitek systems, “Imagenet Mobile Deposit”, San Diego, CA, downloaded 2009 (2 pgs). |
Mitek Systems: Mitek Systems Launches First Mobile Check Deposit and Bill Pay Application, San Diego, CA, Jan. 22, 2008 (3 pgs). |
Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pgs). |
Moreau, T., “Payment by Authenticated Facsimile Transmission: a Check Replacement Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises,” CONNOTECH Experts-conseils, Inc., Apr. 1995 (31 pgs). |
Nelson, B. et al., “Remote deposit capture changes the retail landscape,” Northwestern Financial Review, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi qa3799/is 200607/ai_n16537250, 2006 (3 pgs). |
NetBank, Inc., “Branch Out: Annual Report 2004,” 2004 (150 pgs). |
NetBank, Inc., “Quick Post: Deposit and Payment Forwarding Service,” 2005 (1 pg). |
NetDeposit Awarded Two Patents for Electronic Check Process, NetDeposit, Jun. 18, 2007, (1 pg). |
Nixon, Julie et al., “Fisery Research Finds Banks are Interested in Offering Mobile Deposit Capture as an,” Fiserv, Inc. Brookfield, Wis., (Business Wire), (Feb. 20, 2009), 2 pgs. |
Online Deposit: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.depositnow.com/faq.html, Copyright 2008 (1 pg). |
Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (3 pgs). |
Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132, Jun. 2003 (20 pgs). |
Oxley, Michael G., from the committee of conference; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (27 pgs). |
Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”. Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pgs). |
Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pgs). |
Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 STAT. 1177 (18 pgs). |
Rao, Bharat; “The Internet and The Revolution in Distribution: A Cross-Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs). |
Remotedepositcapture, URL:www.remotedepositcapture.com, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (5 pgs). |
RemoteDepositCapture.com, “PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Businesses”, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 24, 2006, (2 pgs). |
RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankServ Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pgs). |
Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC_overview.htm, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs). |
Richey, J. C. et al., “EE 4530 Check Imaging,” Nov. 18, 2008 (10 pgs). |
Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 pg). |
Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pgs). |
Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pgs). |
Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pgs). |
SoyBank Anywhere, “Consumer Internet Banking Service Agreement,” Dec. 6, 2004 (6 pgs). |
Teixeira, D., “Comment: Time to Overhaul Deposit Processing Systems,” American Banker, Dec. 10, 1998, vol. 163, No. 235, p. 15 (3 pgs). |
Thailandguru.com: How and where to Pay Bills @ www.thailandguru.com/paying-bills.html, © 1999-2007 (2 pgs). |
The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Clearing and Settlement: The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)”, www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/retailretail_02d.html, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Dec. 2005 (3 pgs). |
The Green Sheet 2.0: Newswire, “CO-OP adds home deposit capabilities to suite of check imaging products”, www.greensheet.com/newswire.php?newswire_id=8799, Mar. 5, 2008 (2 pgs). |
Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, In ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pgs). |
Valentine, Lisa, “Remote Deposit Capture Hot Just Got Hotter,” ABA Banking Journal, Mar. 2006, p. 1-9. |
Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pgs). |
Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167. No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pgs). |
Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005_check21Year=2005 (1 pg). |
Wells Fargo Commercial, “Remote Deposit”, www.wellsfargo.com/com/treasury mgmtlreceivables/electronic/remote deposit, Copyright 2008 (1 pg). |
White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. RES. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pgs). |
Whitney et al., “Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37-2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services”, American Bankers Association, May 18, 2004, http://www.aba/com/NR/rdonlyres/CBDC1 A5C-43E3-43CC-B733-BE417C638618/35930/DSTUFormat.pdf (2 pages). |
Wikipedia @, “Remote Deposit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_deposit, 2007 (3 pgs). |
Windowsfordevices.com, “Software lets camera phone users deposit checks, pay bills”, www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS3934956670.html, Jan. 29, 2008 (3 pgs). |
Wolfe, Daniel, “Check Image Group Outlines Agenda,” American Banker, New York, N.Y.: Feb. 13, 2009, vol. 174, Iss. 30, p. 12. (2 pgs). |
Woody Baird Associated Press, “Pastor's Wife got Scammed—She Apparently Fell for Overseas Money Scheme,” The Commercial Appeal, Jul. 1, 2006, p. A. 1. |
Zandifar, A., “A Video-Based Framework for the Analysis of Presentations/Posters,” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Feb. 2, 2005, 10 pages. |
Zhang, C.Y., “Robust Estimation and Image Combining” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, 1995 (5 pgs). |
Zions Bancorporation, “Moneytech, the technology of money in our world: Remote Deposit,” http://www.bankjunior.com/pground/moneytech/remote_deposit.jsp, 2007 (2 pgs). |
Application as filed Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,143 (27 pgs). |
Application as filed Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,741 (235 pgs). |
Application as filed Aug. 21, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,723 (38 pgs). |
Application as filed Aug. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,127 (45 pgs). |
Application as filed Aug. 28, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,443 (41 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 20, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,656 (21 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/321,025 (19 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,494 (280 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,561 (275 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,578 (274 pgs). |
Application as filed Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,594 (275 pgs). |
Application as filed Feb. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,405 (19 pgs). |
Application as filed Feb. 18, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,005 (37 pgs). |
Application as filed Jan. 6, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/400,350 (62 pgs). |
Application as filed Jan. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/735,678 (30 pgs). |
Application as filed Jul. 13, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/487,537 (23 pgs). |
Application as filed Jul. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,613 (48 pgs). |
Application as filed Jul. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,680 (41 pgs). |
Application as filed Jun. 11, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/137,051 (29 pgs). |
Application as filed Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,976 (352 pgs). |
Application as filed Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,007 (356 pgs). |
Application as filed Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,018 (353 pgs). |
Application as filed Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,924 (34 pgs). |
Application as filed Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,928 (36 pgs). |
Application as filed Mar. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,112 (62 pgs). |
Application as filed Mar. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,671 (40 pgs). |
Application as filed Mar. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,930 (37 pgs). |
Application as filed May 10, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,222 (35 pgs). |
Application as filed May 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/156,860 (71 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 17, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,278 (42 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,565 (53 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,925 (36 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 (29 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 25, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,839 (22 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 29, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/926,388 (23 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 30, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,297 (26 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,974 (31 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,008 (27 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,227 (58 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,273 (56 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,537 (27 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,670 (47 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,878 (30 pgs). |
Application as filed Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,884 (30 pgs). |
Application as filed Sep. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,569 (35 pgs). |
Application as filed Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/205,996 (30 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/854,521 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,163 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,175 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Apr. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,145 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,752 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Aug. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,127 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,478 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 20, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,671 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,576 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 28, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/392,950 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/320,998 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/321,027 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,513 (7 pgs). |
Claims as filed Dec. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/964,279 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Feb. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/765,412 (1 pg). |
Claims as filed Feb. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,437 (6 pgs). |
Claims as filed Feb. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,477 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Feb. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/623,179 (10 pgs). |
Claims as filed Feb. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,048 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Feb. 3, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/014,918 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jan. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/010,644 (9 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jan. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,865 (11 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jul. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,497 (1 pg). |
Claims as filed Jul. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/663,284 (6 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jul. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/663,305 (6 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jun. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/738,340 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jun. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,971 (36 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jun. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/183,461 (36 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jun. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/922,686 (7 pgs). |
Claims as filed Jun. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,456 (36 pgs). |
Claims as filed Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,925 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,799 (1 pg). |
Claims as filed Mar. 23, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/467,167 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Mar. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,944 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Mar. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,090 (1 pg). |
Claims as filed Mar. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,482 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed May 10, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed May 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/110,077 (9 pgs). |
Claims as filed May 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,566 (10 pgs). |
Claims as filed Nov. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,268 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Nov. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/360,738 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Nov. 25, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/952,625 (1 pg). |
Claims as filed Nov. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,190 (5 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,868 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,335 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,350 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,364 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 (6 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 24, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/257,471 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,963 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,995 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,998 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,131 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,804 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,878 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,026 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 2, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,781 (4 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/846,586 (7 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,001 (3 pgs). |
Claims as filed Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,007 (3 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2015 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,565 (9 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2015 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,565 (10 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2015 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,565 (9 pgs). |
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 90 pgs. |
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 98 pgs. |
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 95 pgs. |
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-23 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 101 pgs. |
Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., CBM2019-0004, Nov. 8, 2018, 180 pgs. |
“Machine Accepts Bank Deposits”, New York Times, Apr. 12, 1961, 1 pg. |
Shah, Moore's Law, Continuous Everywhere But Differentiable Nowhere, Feb. 12, 2009, located on the Internet at: http://samjshah.com/2009/02/24/morres-law/, 5 pgs. |
Rockwell, The Megapixel Myth, KenRickwell.com, 2008, located on the Internet at: http://kewrockwell.com.tech/mpmyth,htm, 6 pgs. |
Gates, A History of Wireless Standards, Wi-Fi Back to Basics, Areohive Blog, Jul. 2015, located on the Internet at: http://blog.aerohine.com/a-history-of-wireless-standards, 5 pgs. |
Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone, Jan. 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/, 4 pgs. |
Chen, Brian et al., iPhone 3GS Trounces Predecessors, Rivals in Web Browser Speed Test, Wired, Jun. 24, 2009, located on the Internet at: www.wired.com/2009.3gs-speed, 10 pgs. |
Berman, How Hitchcock Turned a Small Budget Into a Great Triumph, Time.com, Apr. 29, 2015, located on the Internet at: http://time.com/3823112/alfred-hitchcock-shadow-of-a-doubt, 1 pg. |
Askey, Leica Digilux 2 Review (pts.1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, May 20, 2004, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/leicadigilux2, 20 pgs. |
Askey, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Review (pts,1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Dec. 6, 2005, located on the Internet at: http://www.dpreview.com.reviews/sonydscr1, 24 pgs. |
Askey, Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 Review (pts.1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Apr. 11, 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmc11, 24 pgs. |
Askey, Nikon D300 In-depth Review (pts.1,3,9), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 12, 2008, located on the Internet at: https://www.preview.com/reviews/nikond300, 24 pgs. |
Askey, Canon EOS 40D Review (pts.1,4,10), Digital Photography Review, located on the Internet at:http: www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos40d, 24 pgs. |
Joinson et al., Olympus E-30 Review (pts.1,4,8), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 24, 2009, located on the Internet at: www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus30, 6 pgs. |
Quinn and Roberds, The Evolution of the Check as a Means of Payment: A Historical Survey, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Economic Review, 2008, 30 pgs. |
Wausau Financial Systems, Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment, 2006, 22 pgs. |
iPhone Store Downloads Top 10 Million in First Weekend, Jul. 14, 2008, located on the Internet at: http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2008/07/14iPhone-App-Stire-Downloads-Top-10_Million-in-First-Weekend, 3 pgs. |
Knerr et al., The A2iA lntercheque System: Courtesy Amount and Legal Amount Recognition for French Checks in Automated Bankcheck Processing 43-86, Impedove et al. eds., 1997, 50 pgs. |
149 Cong. Rec. H9289, Oct. 8, 2003, 6 pgs. |
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, H. R. Rep. No. 108-132, Jun. 2, 2003, 20 pgs. |
ITU-R-M.1225, Guides for Evaluation of Radio Transmission Technologies for IMT-2000, dated 1997, located on the Internet at: https://www.itu.int/dmspubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M,1225-0-199702-1!!PDF-E.pdf, 60 pgs. |
E. MacKenzie, Photography Made Easy, copyright 1845, 80 pgs. |
12 CFR § 229.51 and Appendix D to Part 229 (Jan. 1, 2005 edition), 3 pgs. |
Excerpts from American National Standard for Financial Services, ANS, X9.100-140-2004-Specifications for an Image Replacement Document—IRD, Oct. 1, 2004, 16 pgs. |
Sumits, Major Mobile Milestones—The Last 15 Years, and the Next Five, Cisco Blogs, Feb. 3, 2016, located on the Internet at: https://blogs.cisco.com/sp/mobile-vni-major-mobile-milesrones-the-last15-years-and-the-next-five, 12 pgs. |
Apple Announces the New iPhone 3GS—The Fastest, Most Powerful iPhone Yet, Jun. 8, 2009, located on the Internet at: http://www.apple.com.rensroom/2009/06/08Apple-Annpounces-the-New-iPhone-3GS-The Fastest-Most-Powerful-iPhone-Yet, 4 pgs. |
Motorola, Motomanual, MOTOROKR-E6-GSM-English for wireless phone, copyright 2006, 144 pgs. |
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, dated Aug. 14, 2018, 64 pgs. |
Leica Digilux 2 Instructions located on the Internet: http://www.overgaard.dk/pdf/d2_manual.pdf (attached as Exhibit 2 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 95 pgs. |
Sony Digital Camera User's Guide/ Trouble Shooting Operating Instructions, copyright 2005, located on the Internet at: https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/res/manuals/2654/26544941M.pdf (attached as Exhibit 3 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 136 pgs. |
Panasonic Operating Instructions for Digital Camera/Lens Kit Model No. DMC-L1K, https://www.panasonic.com/content/dam/Panasonic/support_manual/Digital_Still_Camera/English_01-vqt0-vqt2/vqt0w95_L1_oi.pdf (attached as Exhibit 4 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Back N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 129 pgs. |
Nikon Digital Camera D300 User's Manual, located on the Internet at: http://download.nikonimglib.com/archive2/iBuJv00Aj97i01y8BrK49XX0Ts69/D300_EU(En)04.pdf (attached as Exhibit 5 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 195 pgs. |
Canon EOS 40D Digital Camera Instruction Manual, located on the Internet at: http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/6/0900008236/01/EOS40D_HG_EN.pdf (attached as Exhibit 6 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 38 pgs. |
Motorola RAZR MAXX V6 User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://www.phonearena.com/phones/Motorola-RAZR-MAXX-V6_id1680, (attached as Exhibit 7 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 36 pgs. |
Motomanual for Motorazr, located on the Internet at: https://www.cellphones.ca/downloads/phones/manuals/motorola-razr-v3xx-manual.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 8 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 34 pgs. |
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, located on the Internet at: https://www.nokia.com/en_int/phones/sites/default/files/user-guides/Nokia_N95_8GB_Extended_UG_en.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 9 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 77 pgs. |
Helio Ocean User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://standupwireless.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Manual_PAN-TECH_OCEAN.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 10 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 76 pgs. |
HTC Touch Diamond Manual, copyright 2008, (attached as Exhibit 11 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 257 pgs. |
Automated Clearing Houses (ACHs), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (May 2000) available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed31.html, (attached as Exhibit 12 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 4 pgs. |
POP, ARC and BOC—A Comparison, Federal Reserve Banks, at 1(Jan. 7, 2009), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20090107101808/https://www.frbservices.org/files/eventseducation/ pdf/pop_arc_boc_comparison.pdf (attached as Exhibit 13 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 3 pgs. |
David B. Humphrey & Robert Hunt, Getting Rid of Paper: Savings From Check 21, Working Paper No. 12-12, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, (May 2012), available on the Internet at: https://philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-data/publications/working-papers/2012/wp12-12.pdf, (attached as Exhibit 14 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 29 pgs. |
Jeffrey M. Lacker, Payment System Disruptions and the Federal Reserve Following Sep. 11, 2001, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, (Dec. 23, 2003) (attached as Exhibit 19 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 55 pgs. |
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act Foundation for Check 21 Compliance Training, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, (Oct. 16, 2004), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20041016100648/https://www.ffiec.gov/exam/check21/check21foundationdoc.htm, (excerpts attached as Exhibit 20 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 11 pgs. |
Big Red Book, Adobe Systems Incorporated, copyright 2000, (attached as Exhibit 27 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 45 pgs. |
Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs. |
Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs. |
Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs. |
Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 75 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Tim Crews in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Deciaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List, dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 91 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 15 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 42.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs. |
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petitioners Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 14, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 10 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Tim Crews in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preiiminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 99 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 43.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs. |
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, United Services Automobile Association's (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 103 pgs. |
CBM-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779 Matthew A. Calman Declaration, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 15 pgs. |
CBM2019-O0005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779 Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs. |
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 147 pgs. |
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-16 and 18 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 93 pgs. |
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs. |
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Preliminary Claim Constructions And Extrinsic Evidence, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 74 pgs. |
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 94 pgs. |
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 99 pgs. |
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List (as of Apr. 1, 2019) for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 1, 2019, 5 pgs. |
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent owner Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs. |
CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 76 pgs. |
CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-14, 16-29 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 88 pgs. |
CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Preliminary Claim Constructions And Extrinsic Evidence, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 74 pgs. |
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petition for Inter Parties Review of Claims 109 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 56 pgs. |
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Peter Alexander, PhD. as filed in the IPR on Mar. 20, 2019, 99 pgs. |
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 27, 2019, 5 pgs. |
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Exhibit B Proposed Claim Constructions for the '571, '090, '779 and '517 Patents, filed on Feb. 28, 2019, 10 pgs. |
ABA Routing System Transit Number, Wikipedia, dated Sep. 27, 2006, 3pgs. |
Accredited Standards Committee Technical Report TR 33-2006, dated Aug. 28, 2006, 75 pgs. |
ANS X9.100-140-2004, “Specification for an Image Replacement document—IRD”, American Standard for Financial Services, Oct. 1, 2004, 15 pgs. |
ANSI News, Check 21 Goes Into Effect Oct. 28, 2004, dated Oct. 25, 2004, 1 pg. |
ANSI, “Return Reasons for Check Image Exchange of IRDS”, dated May 6, 2016, 23 pgs. |
ANSI, “Specifications For Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, dated Jul. 11, 2006, 230 pgs. |
ANSI X9.7-1999(R2007), Bank Check Background and Convenience Amount Field Specification, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 86 pgs. |
ASCX9, “Specification for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, date Mar. 31, 2003. 156 pgs. |
Bankers' Hotline, “Training Page: Learning the Bank Numbering System”, Copyright 2004, 2 pgs. |
BrainJar Validation Algorithms, archived on Mar. 16, 2016 from BrainJar.com, 2 pgs. |
Canon White Paper, “Two Words Every Business Should Know—Remote Deposit”, dated 2005, 7 pgs. |
CBR online, “Diebold lainches ATM depository technology”, Oct. 4, 2007, 5 pgs. |
Cheq Information Technology White Paper, “Teller Scanner Performance and Scanner Design: Camera Position Relative to the Feeder”, dated 2005, 7 pgs. |
De Jesus, Angie et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment”, dated Nov. 2004, 22 pgs. |
Federal Reserve Adoption of DSTU X9.37-2003, Image Cash Letter Customer Documentation Version 1.8, dated Oct. 1, 2008, 48 pgs. |
Fielding, R. et al, “RFC-2616—Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, Network Working Group, The lnternet Society copyright 1999, 177 pgs. |
Hill, Simon, “From J-Phone to Lumina 1020: A Complete History of the Camera Phone”, dated Aug. 11, 2013, 19 pgs. |
Instrument—Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, dated Mar. 2, 2019, 1 pg. |
lnstrument—Definition of instrument from the Oxford Dictionaries (British & World English), dated Jul. 2, 2017, 44 pgs. |
iPhone Application Programming Guide Device Support, dated Apr. 26, 2009, 7 pgs. |
iPhone Announces the New Phone 3gs—The Fastest, Most Powerful iPhone Yet, Press Release dated Jun. 8, 2009, 4 pgs. |
Klein, Robert, Financial Services Technology, “Image Quality and Usability Assurance: Phase 1 Project”, dated Jul. 23. 2004, 67 pgs. |
Lange, Bill, “Combining Remote Capture and IRD Printing, A Check 21 Strategy for Community and Regional Banks”, dated 2005, 25 pgs. |
Lee, Jeanne, “Mobile Check Deposits: Pro Tips to Ensure They Go Smoothly”, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 pgs. |
Meara, Bob, “State of Remote Deposit Capture 2015: Mobile is the New Scanner”, Dated May 26, 2015, obtained from the Internet at: https://www.celent.com/insights/57842967, 3 pgs. |
Meara, Bob, “State of Remote Deposit Capture 2015 Mobile is the New Scanner”, dated May 2015, 56 pgs. |
Meara, Bob, “USSA's Mobile Remote Deposit Capture”, Dated Jun. 26, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Mitek's Mobile Deposit Processes More Than Two Billion Checks, $1.5 Trillion in Cumulative Check Value, dated Mar. 18, 2018, 2 pgs. |
Mitek, “Video Release—Mitek MiSnap™ Mobile Auto Capture Improves Mobile Deposit® User Experience at Ten Financial Institutions”, dated Jul. 15, 2014, 2 pgs. |
NCR, Mobile Remote Deposit Capture (RDC), copyright 2011, 8 pgs. |
Nokia N90 Review Digital Trends, dated Feb. 11, 2019, obtained from the Internet at https://digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/nokia-n90-review/, 11 pgs. |
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 1 of 3, 67 pgs. |
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 2 of 3, 60gs. |
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 3 of 3, 53 pgs. |
Patel, Kunur, Ad Age, “How Mobile Technology is Changing Banking's Future”, dated Sep. 21, 2009, 3 pgs. |
Remote Deposit Capture Basic Requirements, dated Aug. 22, 2009, 1 pg. |
Remote Deposit Capture.com Scanner Matrix, dated Oct. 21, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Rowles, Tony, USAA-v. Wells Fargo No. 2:16-cv-245-JRGL e-mail correspondence dated Jan. 24, 2019, 2 pgs. |
Sechrest, Stuart et al., “Windows XP Performance”, Microsoft, dated Jun. 1, 2001, 20 pgs. |
Spenser, Harvey, “White Paper Check 21 Controlling Image Quality at the Point of Capture”, dated 2004, 7 pgs. |
Timothy R. Crews list of Patents, printed from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 13, 2019, 7 pgs. |
Van Dyke, Jim, “2017 Mitek Mobile Deposit Benchmark Report”, copyright 2017, 50 pgs. |
Wausau, “Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment”, copyright 2019, 1 pg. |
Whitney, Steve et al., “A Framework for Exchanging Image Returns”, dated Jul. 2001, 129 pgs. |
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 15, dated May 1, 2019, 7 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and supporting exhibits, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 186 pgs. |
USAA's Opening Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 32 pgs. |
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper 14, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 7 pgs. |
USAA's Reply to Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2, 2019, 15 pgs. |
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,899,779, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief Pursuant to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper 15, dated May 1, 2019, 7 pgs. |
P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 5, 2019, 190 pgs. |
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pgs. |
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 18 pgs. |
P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Feb. 28, 2019, 122 pgs. |
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 75 pgs. |
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 36 pgs. |
USAA's Reply Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2. 2019, 227 pgs. |
Parties' P.R. 4-5(D) Joint Claim Construction Chart, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 9, 2019, 25 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15014918 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15884990 | US | |
Parent | 14056565 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15014918 | US |