The present invention relates generally to an electronic system and method, and, in particular embodiments, to character recognition in air-writing based on network of radars for human-machine interface.
Human-machine interfaces are used by humans to interact with machines. Conventional human-machine interfaces have been available for many years. Examples of conventional human-machine interfaces include input hardware, such as keyboards, mice, game pads, microphones, output hardware, such as computer monitors, printers, and speakers, and input/output hardware, such as touchscreens.
Human-machine interfaces may include several categories, such as command line interfaces (e.g., receiving an input via a keyboard and providing an output as text via a computer monitor), graphical user interfaces (e.g., receiving an input via a keyboard and a mouse and providing an output using graphics via a computer monitor), voice user interfaces (e.g., using a person's voice to control a device), and gesture interfaces (e.g., using a person's hand gesture captured via a video camera to control a device).
Human-machine interface may be used to facilitate interaction between humans. For example, a first human may interact with a second human by interacting with a first computer using a first human-machine interface that includes a microphone, a speaker, video camera and a computer monitor. The first computer transmits data associated with such interaction to a second computer. The second human interacts with the second computer using a second human-machine interface that includes a microphone, a speaker, a video camera, and a computer monitor.
In accordance with an embodiment, a method for air-writing character recognition includes: determining a position of an object in a monitoring space using trilateration by using a plurality of millimeter-wave radars, where each millimeter-wave radar of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars has a field of view, and where an intersection of the fields of view of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars forms the monitoring space; tracking the position of the object in the monitoring space over time using the plurality of millimeter-wave radars; determining a character symbol depicted by the tracked position of the object over time using a neural network (NN); and providing a signal based on the determined character symbol.
In accordance with an embodiment, an air-writing character recognition system includes: a plurality of millimeter-wave radars, where each millimeter-wave radar of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars is configured to have a field of view, and where an intersection of the fields of view of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space; and a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on outputs of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, track the position of the object in the monitoring space over time based on the determined position using the plurality of millimeter-wave radars, determine a character symbol depicted by the tracked position of the object over time using a neural network (NN), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
In accordance with an embodiment, a millimeter-wave radar system includes: three millimeter-wave radars, each of the three millimeter-wave radars configured to have a field of view, where an intersection of the fields of view of each of the three millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space; and a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on output of the three millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, determine a trajectory of the object over time based on the determined position of the object, apply a filter to the determined trajectory to generate a filtered trajectory, determine a character symbol depicted by the filtered trajectory using a long-short term memory (LSTM), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Corresponding numerals and symbols in different figures generally refer to corresponding parts unless otherwise indicated. The figures are drawn to clearly illustrate the relevant aspects of the preferred embodiments and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The making and using of the embodiments disclosed are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
The description below illustrates the various specific details to provide an in-depth understanding of several example embodiments according to the description. The embodiments may be obtained without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials and the like. In other cases, known structures, materials or operations are not shown or described in detail so as not to obscure the different aspects of the embodiments. References to “an embodiment” in this description indicate that a particular configuration, structure or feature described in relation to the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Consequently, phrases such as “in one embodiment” that may appear at different points of the present description do not necessarily refer exactly to the same embodiment. Furthermore, specific formations, structures or features may be combined in any appropriate manner in one or more embodiments.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described in a specific context, a system and method of character recognition in air-writing based on network of millimeter-wave radars for human-machine interface. Embodiments of the present invention may be implemented with other types of radars (e.g., other than millimeter-wave radars) and may be used for other applications, such as for machine-machine interface, for example. Although embodiments are illustrated with respect to Latin character symbols and numerical symbols, it is understood that other types of symbols, such as non-Latin characters (e.g., kanji symbols, Hebrew characters, Urdu characters, and sign language gestures) may also be used.
In an embodiment of the present invention, an air-writing system that includes a network of millimeter-wave radars uses a two-stage approach for extraction and recognition of handwriting gestures. The extraction processing stage uses fine range estimates combined with trilateration technique to detect and localize the hand of a user, followed by Kalman filter or any smoothing filter to create a smooth trajectory of the hand gesture movement. The recognition stage classifies characters drawn by the user by using a long short term memory (LSTM) such as a bi-directional LSTM (BiLSTM) that is fed with consecutive Kalman filter states along the gesture trajectory.
Conventional hand gesture recognition systems may be based on camera modules that use computer vision techniques and optical sensors. Camera based recognition systems generally use substantial computational power processing graphic images that are illuminated with proper illumination and that include at least portions of a human. Hand-gesture recognition systems may also be implemented using light and time-of-flight (ToF) technology.
Advantages of some embodiments include accurately detecting character symbols handwritten with hand gestures without processing graphic images without being impacted by illumination changes of the hand performing the gesture. Some embodiments, therefore, are less computationally costly than conventional camera based systems as well as avoid privacy issues associated with graphic images of humans. Some embodiments advantageously determine character symbols from hand gestures without using wearables that aid in hand gesture recognition. Using millimeter-wave radars instead of conventional ToF technology advantageously allows for using estimates of Doppler shifts to accurately determine the trajectory of the hand.
In an embodiment, motion gesture sensing is performed wirelessly by a network of millimeter-wave radars. Trilateration is used to accurately localize the hand in three-dimensional coordinates. A Kalman filter or any smoothing filter is used to track and smooth the trajectory of the hand in motion. A bi-directional LSTM generates the text representation from the hand motion sensor data received from the Kalman filter.
The transmitted radiation pulses 106 are reflected by objects (also referred to as targets) in scene 108. The reflected radiation pulses (not shown in
The objects in scene 108 may include, for example, hand 114 of a human. Scene 108 may include other objects, such as a finger of a hand, a metallic marker, and other objects.
Processor 104 analyses the echo data to determine the location of, e.g., hand 114 using signal processing techniques. For example, in some embodiments, a range FFT is used for estimating the range component of the location of a tip of an index finger of hand 114 (i.e., the distance of the tip of the index finger of hand 114 from the millimeter-wave radar). The azimuth component of the location of the detected human may be determined using angle estimation techniques.
Processor 104 may be implemented as a general purpose processor, controller or digital signal processor (DSP) that includes, for example, combinatorial circuits coupled to a memory. In some embodiments, the DSP may be implemented with an ARM architecture, for example. In some embodiments, processor 104 may be implemented as a custom application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In some embodiments, processor 104 includes a plurality of processors, each having one or more processing cores. In other embodiments, processor 104 includes a single processor having one or more processing cores. Other implementations are also possible. For example, some embodiments may be implemented as a combination of hardware accelerator and software running on a DSP or general purpose micro-controller.
Millimeter-wave radar 102 operates as a frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar that includes a millimeter-wave radar sensor circuit, a transmitting antenna, and a receiving antenna. Millimeter-wave radar 102 transmits and receives signals in the 20 GHz to 122 GHz range. Alternatively, frequencies outside of this range, such as frequencies between 1 GHz and 20 GHz, or frequencies between 122 GHz and 300 GHz, may also be used.
In some embodiments, the echo signals received by the receiving antenna of millimeter-wave radar 102 are filtered and amplified using band-pass filter (BPFs), low-pass filter (LPFs), mixers, low-noise amplifier (LNAs), and intermediate frequency (IF) amplifiers in ways known in the art. The echo signals are then digitized using one or more analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) for further processing. Other implementations are also possible.
During normal operation, VCO 206 generates a linear frequency chirp (e.g., from 57 GHz to 64 GHz) that is transmitted by transmitting antenna 212. The VCO is controlled by PLL 204, which receives a reference clock signal (e.g., 80 MHz) from reference oscillator 202. PLL 204 is controlled by a loop that includes divider 208 and amplifier 210.
The linear chirp transmitted by transmitting antenna 212 is reflected by hand 114 and received by receiving antenna 214. The echo received by transmitting antenna 214 is mixed with the signal transmitted by transmitting antenna 212 using mixer 216 to produce an intermediate frequency (IF) signal x(t) (also known as the beat signal). The beat signal x(t) is filtered with low-pass filtered by LPF 218 and then sampled by ADC 220. ADC 220 is advantageously capable of sampling the beat signal x(t) with a sampling frequency that is much smaller than the frequency of signal received by receiving antenna 214. Using FMCW radars, therefore, advantageously allows for a compact and low cost implementation of ADC 220, in some embodiments.
The propagation delay between the signal transmitted by transmitting antenna 212 and receiving antenna 214 may be identified by determining the beat frequency of the beat signal x(t). The beat frequency of beat signal x(t) may be identified by using spectral analysis (e.g., by using FFT) using processor 104.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a millimeter-wave radar performs fine range estimation based on the frequency and phase of the beat signal.
The beat signal x(t) may be given by
x(t)=Aej(2πf
where fb is the beat frequency and is the difference between the signal transmitted by transmitting antenna 212 and the signal received by receiving antenna 214.
The beat frequency may be given by
where B is the ramp bandwidth of the linear chirp transmitted by transmitting antenna 212, R is the range or distance to hand 114, c is the speed of light, and Tc is the linear chirp duration.
Speed of light c is a known constant, and bandwidth B, and linear chirp duration Tc are known quantities for a particular system. For example, in some embodiments, millimeter-wave radar 102 is characterized by having an elevation field-of-view (FoV) of 70°, an azimuth FoV of 70°, a ramp start frequency fmin of 57 GHz, a ramp stop frequency fmax of 63 GHz, a bandwidth B of 6 GHz (fmax−fmin), a chirp time Tc of 171.2 μs, a sampling frequency fs of 0.747664 MHz, and a number of samples per chirp Ns of 128. Since the beat frequency fb may be estimated, e.g., using spectral analysis of the beat signal x(t), and quantities B, c, and Tc are known, range R may be estimated by using Equation 2.
The beat signal phase ϕb may be given by
Since Equation 3 also includes range R, it is possible to improve range estimate by using Equations 2 and 3. For example,
During step 302, the beat frequency estimate {circumflex over (f)}b is estimated, e.g., using Equation 1 and a Fourier transform, such as an FFT. During step 304, a coarse range estimate Rfb is estimated, e.g., using Equation 2 and the beat frequency estimate {circumflex over (f)}b estimated in step 302. During step 306, a beat signal phase estimate {circumflex over (ϕ)}b is estimated, e.g., using Equation 3 and the coarse range estimate Rfb estimated in step 304.
During step 308, the beat signal {tilde over (x)}(t) is demodulated. The beat signal may be demodulated by
{tilde over (x)}(t)=x(t)·e−j(2π{circumflex over (f)}
where {tilde over (x)}(t) is the demodulated signal. Substituting beat signal x(t) in Equation 4 with x(t) in Equation 1 results in
{tilde over (x)}(t)=Aej[2π(fb−{circumflex over (f)}b)t+(ϕb−{circumflex over (ϕ)}b)] (5)
or
{tilde over (x)}(t)=Aej[2π(Δfb)t+Δϕb] (6)
where Δfb=fb−{circumflex over (f)}b and Δϕb=ϕb−{circumflex over (ϕ)}b.
When beat frequency fb has only a single component, the phase Δϕb of demodulated signal {tilde over (x)}(t) in Equation 6 is linear in time with a slope Δfb and a y-intersect Δϕb. During step 310, the demodulated beat phase Δϕb is determined, e.g., using demodulated signal {tilde over (x)}(t).
During step 312, range ΔR is determined, e.g., using Equation 3. For example, ΔR may be determined by
During step 314, fine estimate range Rfb,ϕb is determined based on ΔR. For example, fine estimate range Rjb,ϕb may be determined by
Rfb,ϕb=Rfb+ΔR (8)
In an embodiment of the present invention, three millimeter-wave radars form a network of millimeter-wave radars. Each of the three millimeter-wave radar have a respective FoV directed to a monitoring space. When an object, such as hand 114 enters the monitoring space, each of the three millimeter-wave radars performs a fine range estimate to determine the range of hand 114 with respect to the respective millimeter-wave radar. A trilateration technique based on the fine range estimates from each of the three millimeter-wave radars is used to determine the location of hand 114 in the monitoring spaces.
In some embodiments, the network of radars is non-coherent and each of the millimeter-wave radars operates independently from each other when monitoring the same target. Processing for localizing the target (e.g., a finger) in the monitoring space (e.g., a finger) using data from the network of radars may be performed centrally (e.g., using a central processor) or distributed (e.g., using a plurality of processors, such as the processors of the millimeter-wave radars of the network of radars).
and horizontal distance Dhor may be given by
where h is the distance between millimeter-wave radar 402 and plane 406, and where vertical distance Dver and horizontal distance Dhor are in plane 406, as shown in
The FoV of millimeter-wave radar 402 may be extended by steering the millimeter-wave radar by an angle ϕ. For Example,
distance dv1 may be given
by and distance dv2 may be given by
As shown in
Monitoring space 608 is formed at an intersection of FoVs FoV602, FoV604, and FoV606 of millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606, respectively. In some embodiments, monitoring space 608 has a volume of about 10 cm3. In some embodiments, monitoring space 608 may have a volume higher than 10 cm3, such as 11 cm3, 13 cm3, 15 cm3 or more, or lower than 10 cm3, such as 9 cm3, 7 cm3 or less.
During normal operation, millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606 monitor monitoring space 608. When an object, such as hand 114 or a finger of hand 114 enters monitoring space 608, millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606 are used to determine the location of such object using trilateration.
When the object is located at point T(x,y,z), where point T(x,y,z) is located at distances D1, D2, and D3 from millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606, respectively, the coordinates of T may be obtained by
which in matrix form is given by
which can be rewritten in the form
Ax=b (11)
where xε E and where E={(x0,x1,x2,x3)T ε /x0=x12+x22+x32}
When R1, R2, and R3 do not lie in a straight line, Range(A) is 3 and dim(K ern(A))=1, and the solution to Equation 11 may be given by
x=xp+αxh (12)
where xp is the particular solution of Equation 11, xh is a solution of the homogenous system Ax=0 and α is a real parameter.
Real parameter a may be determined by using Equation 12 to generate Equation 13
where xp=(xp0,xp1,xp2,xp3)T, xh=(xh0,xh1,xh2,xh3)T, and x=(x0,x1,x2,x3)T. Since xε E, then
xp0+α·xh0=(xp1+α·xh1)2+(xp2°α·xh2)2+(sp3+α·xh3)2 (14)
and thus
α2(xh12+xh22+xh320+α(2·xp1·xh1+2·xp2·xh2+2·xp3·xh3−xh0)+xp12 +xp22+xp32−xp0=0 (15)
Equation 15 is a quadratic equation of the form aα2+bα+c=0 with a solution given by
Some embodiments may implement the trilateration technique in other ways known in the art.
As shown in
Processor 702 may be implemented as a general purpose processor, controller or digital signal processor (DSP) that includes, for example, combinatorial circuits coupled to a memory. In some embodiments, the DSP may be implemented with an ARM architecture, for example. In some embodiments, processor 702 may be implemented as a custom application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In some embodiments, processor 702 includes a plurality of processors, each having one or more processing cores. In other embodiments, processor 702 includes a single processor having one or more processing cores. Other implementations are also possible. For example, some embodiments may be implemented as a combination of hardware accelerator and software running on a DSP or general purpose micro-controller. In some embodiments, processor 702 may be implemented together with a processor 104 of one of millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, or 606.
In some embodiments, processor 702 determines a plurality of locations of the object over time based on data received from millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606, and uses a filter such as a Kalman filter or any other smoothing filter to generate a smooth trajectory of the object in monitoring space 608 over time in a two-dimensional (2D) plane.
A Kalman filter may be considered as an iterative process that uses a set of equations and consecutive data inputs to estimate position, velocity, etc., of an object when the data inputs (e.g., measured values) contain unpredicted or random error, uncertainty or variation. In an embodiment, a constant acceleration model is used for motion sensing and trajectory generation in a 2D plane. For example, the location, velocity, and acceleration of the object monitoring space 608 in a 2D plane may be given by vector x by
x=[xy{dot over (x)}{dot over (y)}{umlaut over (x)}ÿ] (17)
and
where xk is the state of x at time k, and where δt is the time step.
The observation model that maps the state of the estimation with observed space may be given by
and the 2D location z(x,y) may be estimated by network of millimeter-wave radars 600 using trilateration techniques. A processing noise may cause uncertainty in estimating the position of the sensed object through the state transition model of the Kalman filter. The processing noise may be modeled with process covariance matrix Q, which may be given by
Q=G·GT·ρa2 (20)
where G=[0.52 0.5δt2 δt δt 1 1] and ρa2 is an acceleration process noise.
There may be noise in the estimated location estimated by trilateration. The noise may arise due to, e.g., thermal noise from the millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606. The measurement noise due to noisy sensor measurements (e.g., noise associated with generating the fine range estimates) may be given by
where R represents the measurement noise variance on each axis.
During step 802, the covariance matrices P, Q, and R, are initialized, where covariance matrix P corresponds to the covariance of the estimates of the location of the object, covariance matrix Q corresponds to the covariance of the processing noise, and covariance matrix R corresponds to the covariance of the measurement noise. In some embodiments, the initial values of matrices P, Q, and R are systematically determined based on, e.g., an experimental setup. In other embodiments, the initial values of matrices P, Q, and R are set to a predetermined default values, such as scaled identity matrices, or others.
During prediction step 804, a prediction of the location of the object is made based on the current state of the Kalman filter. Step 804 includes steps 806 and 808. During step 806, the state transition may be determined by
{tilde over (x)}k+1=Axk (22)
During step 808, the covariance projection of the position may be determined by
{tilde over (P)}k+1=APkAT+Q (23)
During correction/update step 810, the estimate of the location is updated based on the fine range estimates from network of millimeter-wave radars 600 and from the estimated location from step 804. Step 810 includes 812, 814, 816 and 818.
During step 812, fine range estimates zk of the position of the object are received from network of millimeter-wave radars 600. During step 814, the Kalman gain Kk is determined based on covariance matrix Pk and R, and may be given by
Kk={tilde over (P)}k+1HT(H{tilde over (P)}k+1HT+R)−1 (24)
During step 816, the estimate xk is updated based on fine range estimates zk and the Kalman gain Kk. The estimate xk may be given by
xk+1={tilde over (x)}k+1+Kk(zk−H{tilde over (x)}k+1) (25)
During step 818, the covariance matrix Pk is updated, for example, by
Pk+1=(1−KkH){tilde over (P)}k+1 (26)
After step 818, k is increased by one and the sequence is repeated, as shown in
Some embodiments may implement the Kalman filter in other ways known in the art.
Using a Kalman filter advantageously allows for smoothing the trajectory of the object in the monitoring space.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a neural network, such as an LSTM neural network (e.g., an unidirectional or bidirectional LSTM), is trained, during a training phase, with a collection of gestures of an object (e.g., a metal marker, hand or finger) moving in monitoring space 608. During normal operation, the LSTM neural network is then used to associate (e.g., assign a label) the smoothened trajectories generated by the Kalman filter with character symbols, such as Latin characters, where the smoothened trajectories generated by the Kalman filter correspond to gestures performed by an object in monitoring space 608 during normal operation.
LSTM neural networks may be understood as recurrent networks that include a memory to model temporal dependencies. The activation of a neuron is fed back to itself with a weight and a unit time delay, which provides it with a memory (hidden value) of past activations, which allows it to learn the temporal dynamics of sequential data. Given a temporal input sequence al=(a1l, . . . , aTl) of length T, a recurrent neural network (RNN) may map it to a sequence of hidden values hl=(h1l, . . . , hTl) and output a sequence of activations a(l+1)=(a1(l+1), . . . , aT(l+1)) by iterating
hlt=ρ(Wxhlatl+ht−1lWhhl+bhl) (27)
where ρ is the non-linear activation function, bhl is the hidden bias vector and W terms denote weight matrices, Wxhl being the input-hidden weight matrix and Whhl the hidden-hidden weight matrix. The activation for the recurrent units may be given by
att+1=htlWhal+bal (28)
where Whal is the hidden-activation weight matrix and bal is the bias activation vector.
LSTMs extend RNN with memory cells by using gating. Gating may be understood as a mechanism based on component-wise multiplication of inputs that control the behavior of each individual memory cell of the LSTM. The LSTM updates its cell state according to an activation of the gates. The input provided to an LSTM is fed into different gates that control which operation is performed on the cell memory. The operations include write (input gate), read (output gate) and reset (forget gate). The vectorial representation (vectors denoting all units in a layer) of the update of an LSTM later may be given by
where i, f, o and c are respectively the input gate, forget gate, output gate, and cell activation vectors, all of which may have the same size as vector h, which represents the hidden value. Terms a represent non-linear functions (e.g., a sigmoid function). The term at is the input of the memory cell at time t and, in some embodiments, may be the location output at time k from the Kalman filter. Wai, Whi, Wci, Waf, Whf, Wcf, Wac, Whc, Who, and Wco are weight matrices, where subscripts represent from-to relationships, and terms bi, bf, bc, and bo are bias vectors.
The input weights may be the input states to the LSTM and are determined during the training phase. In some embodiments, the input weights of the LSTM are the Kaman filtered states of the variables x, y, {dot over (x)}{dot over (y)}{umlaut over (x)}ÿ of Equation 17. The loss function of the LSTM may be the loss determined at a single sequence step, which may be the average of log loss determined separately for each label, and may be given by
where ŷ is predicted class probability or label probability, y is the true class or label and L is the number possible classes or labels.
As shown in
Although a metal marker was used to generate the trajectories illustrated in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the trajectory of an object is a depiction of a character symbol, such as shown in
Some embodiments may implement the LSTM network in other ways known in the art.
During normal operation, millimeter-wave radars 602, 604 and 606 send and receive radar signals towards monitoring space 608 during steps 1102602, 1102604, and 1102606, respectively. The received radar signals may be filtered and digitized using, e.g., LPF 218 and ADC 220.
During step 1103602, 1106604, and 1103606, background removal and filtering is performed, e.g. by respective processors 104. For example, the digitized radar data generated during steps 1102602, 1102604, and 1102606, may be filtered, and DC components may be removed, e.g., to remove the transmitter-receiver self-interference and optionally pre-filtering the interference colored noise. In some embodiments, filtering includes removing data outliers that have significantly different values from other neighboring range-gate measurements. Thus, this filtering also serves to remove background noise from the radar data. In a specific example, a Hampel filter is applied with a sliding window at each range-gate to remove such outliers. Alternatively, other filtering for range preprocessing known in the art may be used.
When an object enters monitoring space 608, millimeter-wave radars 602, 604 and 606 detect the object during steps 1104602, 1104604, and 1104606, respectively, based on the radar signals received during steps 1102602, 1102604, and 1102606, respectively, and filtered during steps 1103602, 1106604, and 1103606, respectively. For example, in some embodiments, an object is detected by using range FFT on the radar data and detecting an object when a range bin is higher than a predetermined threshold. Other methods for object detection may also be used.
In some embodiments, not all detected objects are selected for tracking and further processing. For example, in some embodiments, the Doppler velocity of an detected object is determined. If the Doppler velocity is within a predetermined Doppler velocity range (e.g., a velocity range of a typical human hand movements), millimeter-wave radars 602, 604, and 606 may select such object for further processing. If the Doppler velocity is outside the predetermined Doppler velocity range, such as too slow (e.g., static) or too fast (e.g., 10 m/s), the object may be ignored and not selected for further processing. In some embodiments, other attributes, such as the size of the object detected, may be used, instead, or in addition to Doppler velocity to select an object for further processing.
During steps 1106602, 1106604, and 1106606, millimeter-wave radars 602, 604 and 606 respectively generate fine range estimates of the distance towards the detected and selected object (e.g., a tip of a finger of hand 114) using, e.g., method 300. During step 1107, processor 702 determines the location of the object in monitoring space 608 using trilateration, such as explained with respect to Equations 9 to 16. Processor 702 also generates traces of the determined location over time (e.g., by storing each determined location in local memory, for example).
During step 1108, processor 702 smoothens the trajectory (traces) generated during step 1107 and track the object over time, e.g., by using a Kalman filter, such as using method 800. In some embodiments, other smoothening filters may be used.
During step 1112, processor 702 associates the trajectory generated by the Kalman filter in step 1108 with a character symbol using an LSTM network, such as LSTM network 900, and generates an output (label) based on the association.
In some embodiments, the neural network used in step 1112 is implemented as an unidirectional or bidirectional LSTM network. In other embodiments, other types of neural networks may be used. For example, in some embodiments, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is used during step 1112 to generate an output (label) based on the trajectory generate by the Kalman filter in step 1108. For example, in some embodiments, a 2D image, similar to the images shown in
In some embodiments, processor 702 determines the beginning and end of a trajectory based on fixed boundaries to generate a segment of trajectory. Processor 702 then feeds such segment of trajectory to LSTM network 900 for classification purposes. For example,
During step 1202, network of millimeter-wave radars 600 detect an object, such as a tip of a finger of hand 114 entering monitoring space 608. During step 1204, a smoothened trajectory of the object in monitoring space 608 is generated for a fixed number of frames, such as 100 frames during 2 seconds. The smoothening trajectory may be obtained as described in step 1101 of
During step 1206, the LSTM network receives the fixed number of frames and generates an output, as described with respect to step 1112 of
During step 1304, a smoothened trajectory of the object in monitoring space 608 is generated for a bounded number of frames. The bound may be determined, for example, by detecting that the object exit monitoring space 608. The number of frames in such a bounded segment may be different for each trajectory.
During step 1306, the LSTM network receives the bounded number of frames and generates an output, as described with respect to step 1112 of
In some embodiments, processor 702 uses a connectionist temporal classification (CTC) layer to process unsegmented stream of data from the output of LSTM network 900, where the unsegmented stream of data is based on an unsegmented stream of location of the object over time. The output of LSTM network 900 is transformed into a conditional probability distribution over a label sequence. The total probability of any one label sequence may be found by summing the probabilities of different alignments. Processor 702 then segments the trajectory based on the output of the CTC layer and associates the segmented trajectory with a character symbol. The general operation of a CTC layer is known in the art.
During step 1404, a smoothened trajectory of the object in monitoring space 608 is generated continuously and is fed to an LSTM network with a CTC layer. During step 1406, the LSTM network with the CTC layer finds in real time the frame alignment with higher probability based on the possible LSTM labels (e.g., the set of possible character symbols plus a blank), segments the frame in accordance with such alignments and outputs the associated character symbol that corresponds with the segmented trajectory. In this way, processor 702 is advantageously capable of generating a continuous sequence of character symbols based on the trajectory of an object in monitoring space 608 without having to use predetermined time boundaries. By using an LSTM with CTC, processor 702 is advantageously capable of accurately associating character symbols with object trajectory irrespective of whether the object is moving fast or slow in monitoring space 608.
Some embodiments may implement the LSTM network with CTC in other ways known in the art.
It is understood that methods 1200, 1300, and 1400 may be combined in various ways. For example, in some embodiments, processor 702 may begin monitoring an object when the object enters monitoring space 608 and continuously generate character symbols using an LSTM with CTC for a predetermined number of frames (e.g., 500 or more) or until the object exits monitoring space 608.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1504 is at 10 cm from screen 1504. In some embodiments, the distance between the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1504 and screen 1504 is smaller than 10 cm, such as 9 cm, 8 cm, or smaller. In some embodiments, the distance between the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1504 and screen 1504 is larger than 10 cm, such as 11 cm, 14 cm, or larger.
Screen 1504 may be, for example, a 5.2 inch screen. In some embodiments, smaller screens, such as 5.1 inch, 5 inch, 4.7 inch or smaller may be used. Larger screens, such as 5.3 inch, 5.5 inch or larger may be used.
In some embodiments, other devices, such as devices larger than smartphone 1502 may implement network of millimeter-wave radars 600 for character recognition in air writing. For example, in some embodiments, tablets, computer monitors, or TVs may implement network of millimeter-wave radars 600 in a similar manner as smartphone 1502. For example,
As shown in
In some embodiments, the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1604 is at 20 cm from screen 1504. In some embodiments, the distance between the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1204 and screen 1204 is smaller than 20 cm, such as 18 cm, 15 cm, or smaller. In some embodiments, the distance between the outer edge of monitoring space 608 that is closest to screen 1604 and screen 1604 is larger than 20 cm, such as 25 cm, 30 cm, or larger.
Screen 1604 may be, for example, a 27 inch screen. In some embodiments, smaller screens, such as 24 inch, 21 inch, 20 inch or smaller may be used. Larger screens, such as 34 inch, or larger may be used.
Example embodiments of the present invention are summarized here. Other embodiments can also be understood from the entirety of the specification and the claims filed herein.
A method for air-writing character recognition, the method including: determining a position of an object in a monitoring space using trilateration by using a plurality of millimeter-wave radars, where each millimeter-wave radar of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars has a field of view, and where an intersection of the fields of view of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars forms the monitoring space; tracking the position of the object in the monitoring space over time using the plurality of millimeter-wave radars; determining a character symbol depicted by the tracked position of the object over time using a neural network (NN); and providing a signal based on the determined character symbol.
The method of example 1, where determining the character symbol is based on the tracked position of the object over a predetermined fixed time.
The method of one of examples 1 or 2, where determining the character symbol is based on the tracked position of the object over a bounded time.
The method of one of examples 1 to 3, further including determining the bounded time based on detecting when the object enters and exits the monitoring space.
The method of one of examples 1 to 4, where the NN includes a recurrent NN (RNN).
The method of one of examples 1 to 5, where the RNN includes a long-short term memory (LSTM) network.
The method of one of examples 1 to 6, further including: receiving an unsegmented stream of locations of the object over time; and using a connectionist temporal classification (CTC) to generate a sequence of character symbols based on the unsegmented stream of locations.
The method of one of examples 1 to 7, where the NN includes a convolutional NN (CNN).
The method of one of examples 1 to 8, where the character symbol includes a number or a Latin character.
The method of one of examples 1 to 9, where tracking the position of the object includes: determining a trajectory of the object based on multiple determinations of the position of the object over time; and using a smoothening filter to smooth the determined trajectory.
The method of one of examples 1 to 10, where the smoothening filter includes a Kalman filter.
The method of one of examples 1 to 11, where the object includes a hand of a human.
The method of one of examples 1 to 12, where the object includes a finger of a human.
The method of one of examples 1 to 13, where the object includes a metallic object.
The method of one of examples 1 to 14, where three millimeter-wave radars of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars are not situated in a straight line.
The method of one of examples 1 to 15, where the monitoring space is located at a distance between 0.3 m and 0.6 m from each millimeter-wave radar of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars.
The method of one of examples 1 to 16, further including: transmitting a chirp towards the monitoring space; receiving an echo of the chirp from the monitoring space; generating a beat signal based on the echo of the chirp; determining a beat frequency based on the beat signal; determining a first range based on the beat frequency; determining a beat signal phase based on the first range; generating a demodulated beat signal based on the determined beat frequency and the determined beat signal phase; determining a demodulated beat phase based on the demodulated beat signal; determining a demodulated beat range based on the demodulated beat phase; determining a fine range estimate based on the demodulated beat range; and determining the position of the object based on the fine range estimate.
An air-writing character recognition system including: a plurality of millimeter-wave radars, where each millimeter-wave radar of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars is configured to have a field of view, and where an intersection of the fields of view of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space; and a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on outputs of the plurality of millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, track the position of the object in the monitoring space over time based on the determined position using the plurality of millimeter-wave radars, determine a character symbol depicted by the tracked position of the object over time using a neural network (NN), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
The air-writing character recognition system of example 18, where determining the character symbol is based on the tracked position of the object over a bounded time.
The air-writing character recognition system of one of examples 18 or 19, where the controller is further configured to: generate an unsegmented stream of locations of the object over time; and use a connectionist temporal classification (CTC) to generate a sequence of character symbols based on the unsegmented stream of locations.
The air-writing character recognition system of one of examples 18 to 20, where the controller is configured to track the position of the object by using a Kalman filter.
The air-writing character recognition system of one of examples 18 to 21, where the NN includes a long-short term memory (LSTM) network.
A millimeter-wave radar system including: three millimeter-wave radars, each of the three millimeter-wave radars configured to have a field of view, where an intersection of the fields of view of each of the three millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space; and a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on output of the three millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, determine a trajectory of the object over time based on the determined position of the object, apply a filter to the determined trajectory to generate a filtered trajectory, determine a character symbol depicted by the filtered trajectory using a long-short term memory (LSTM), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
A smartphone includes a millimeter-wave radar system and a screen. The millimeter-wave radar system includes: three millimeter-wave radars. Each of the millimeter-wave radars located at a corner of the smartphone. Each of the three millimeter-wave radars is configured to have a field of view, where an intersection of the fields of view of each of the three millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space. The smartphone further including a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on output of the three millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, determine a trajectory of the object over time based on the determined position of the object, apply a filter to the determined trajectory to generate a filtered trajectory, determine a character symbol depicted by the filtered trajectory using a long-short term memory (LSTM), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
A computer monitor includes a millimeter-wave radar system and a screen. The millimeter-wave radar system includes: three millimeter-wave radars. Each of the millimeter-wave radars located at a corner of the smartphone. Each of the three millimeter-wave radars is configured to have a field of view, where an intersection of the fields of view of each of the three millimeter-wave radars forms a monitoring space. The smartphone further including a controller configured to: determine a position of an object in the monitoring space based on output of the three millimeter-wave radars by using trilateration, determine a trajectory of the object over time based on the determined position of the object, apply a filter to the determined trajectory to generate a filtered trajectory, determine a character symbol depicted by the filtered trajectory using a long-short term memory (LSTM), and provide a signal based on the determined character symbol.
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4241347 | Albanese et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
6147572 | Kaminski et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6414631 | Fujimoto | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6636174 | Arikan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7048973 | Sakamoto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057564 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7171052 | Park | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7317417 | Arikan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7596241 | Rittscher et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7692574 | Nakagawa | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7873326 | Sadr | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7889147 | Tam et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8228382 | Pattikonda | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8497805 | Rofougaran et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8659369 | Rofougaran et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8731502 | Salle et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8836596 | Richards et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8847814 | Himmelstoss et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860532 | Gong et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8976061 | Chowdhury | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9172132 | Kam et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9182476 | Wintermantel | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9202105 | Wang et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9413079 | Kamgaing et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9495600 | Heu et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9504920 | Kareemi | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9886095 | Pothier | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9935065 | Baheti et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10055660 | Mahmoud | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10386481 | Chen | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10591998 | Masuko | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10739864 | Scott, II | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10877568 | Huang | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20030179127 | Wienand | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040238857 | Beroz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060001572 | Gaucher et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060049995 | Imaoka et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067456 | Ku et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070210959 | Herd et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080106460 | Kurtz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080238759 | Carocari et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291115 | Doan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308917 | Pressel et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090073026 | Nakagawa | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085815 | Jakab et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153428 | Rofougaran et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090315761 | Walter et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100207805 | Haworth | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100313150 | Morris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110181509 | Rautiainen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110254765 | Brand | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110299433 | Darabi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120087230 | Guo et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092284 | Rofougaran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116231 | Liao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195161 | Little et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206339 | Dahl | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265486 | Klofer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268314 | Kuwahara et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280900 | Wang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313900 | Dahl | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326995 | Zhang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130027240 | Chowdhury | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130106673 | McCormack et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140028542 | Lovitt et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140070994 | Schmalenberg et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140145883 | Baks et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140324888 | Xie et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150181840 | Tupin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150185316 | Rao et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212198 | Nishio et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243575 | Strothmann et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150277569 | Sprenger et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150325925 | Kamgaing et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346820 | Poupyrev et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150348821 | Iwanaga et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364816 | Murugan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160018511 | Nayyar et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041617 | Poupyrev | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160041618 | Poupyrev | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061942 | Rao et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160061947 | Patole et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098089 | Poupyrev | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160103213 | Ikram et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160109566 | Liu et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160118353 | Ahrens et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135655 | Ahn et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160146931 | Rao et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160146933 | Rao et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160178730 | Trotta et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187462 | Altus et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191232 | Subburaj et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223651 | Kamo et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240907 | Haroun | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160249133 | Sorensen | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160252607 | Saboo et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160259037 | Molchanov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160266233 | Mansour | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269815 | Liao et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291130 | Ginsburg et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160299215 | Dandu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306034 | Trotta et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320852 | Poupyrev | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160320853 | Lien et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327633 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334502 | Ali et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160349845 | Poupyrev et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378195 | Lefebvre | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170033062 | Liu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170045607 | Bharadwaj et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052618 | Lee et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054449 | Mani et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170060254 | Molchanov et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070952 | Balakrishnan et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074974 | Rao et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074980 | Adib et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170090014 | Subburaj et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170090015 | Breen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170115377 | Giannini et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170131395 | Reynolds et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139036 | Nayyar et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170141453 | Waelde et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170170947 | Yang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170176574 | Eswaran et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192847 | Rao et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170201019 | Trotta | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212597 | Mishra | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170364160 | Malysa et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180046255 | Rothera et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180071473 | Trotta et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180101239 | Yin et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180157330 | Gu | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190311227 | Kriegman | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200026361 | Baheti | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200082196 | Georgis | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200150771 | Giusti | May 2020 | A1 |
20200201443 | Huang | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200234030 | Baheti | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200250413 | Lu | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200293613 | Ramachandra Iyer | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210033693 | Chen | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1463161 | Dec 2003 | CN |
1716695 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101490578 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101585361 | Nov 2009 | CN |
102788969 | Nov 2012 | CN |
102967854 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103529444 | Jan 2014 | CN |
203950036 | Nov 2014 | CN |
102008054570 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102011100907 | Jan 2012 | DE |
102011075725 | Nov 2012 | DE |
102014118063 | Jul 2015 | DE |
2247799 | Mar 1992 | GB |
2001174539 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2004198312 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2006234513 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008029025 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008089614 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009069124 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011529181 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012112861 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2013521508 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014055957 | Mar 2014 | JP |
20090063166 | Jun 2009 | KR |
20140082815 | Jul 2014 | KR |
2007060069 | May 2007 | WO |
2013009473 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2016033361 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
A CNN Based Framework for Unistroke Numeral Recognition in Air-Writing (Year: 2018). |
Fingertip Detection and Tracking for Recognition of Air-Writing in Videos (Year: 2018). |
Finger-Writing-In-The-Air System Using Kinect Sensor (Year: 2021). |
Norrdine, A., “An Algebraic Solution to the Multilateration Problem”, 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, Nov. 13-15, 2012, 5 pages. |
Agarwal, C. et al., “Segmentation and Recognition of Text Written in 3D using Leap Motion Interface”, 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conferecne on Pattern Recognition, Nov. 1, 2015, 5 pages. |
Amma, C. et al., “Airwriting: Hands-free Mobile Text Input by Spotting and Continuous Recognition of 3d-Space Handwriting with Inertial Sensors”, 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Jun. 18-22, 2012, 8 pages. |
Moazen, D. et al., “AirDraw: Leveraging Smart Watch Motion Sensors for Mobile Human Computer Interactions”, 2016 31th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan. 9-12, 2016, 5 pages. |
Zhang, J. et al., “Deformable Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network in Microwave Based Hand Gestrue Recognition System”, College of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Mar. 4, 2019, 6 pages. |
Ikram, M.Z. et al., “High-Accuracy Distance Measurement Using Millimeter-Wave Radar”, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Nov. 29, 2017, 5 pages. |
Molchanov, P. et al., “Short-Range FMCW Monopulse Radar for Hand-Gesture Sensing”, May 10-15, 2015, 6 pages. |
Roy, P. et al., “A CNN Based Framework for Unistroke Numeral Recognition in Air-Writing”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Feb. 23, 2019, 1 page. |
Zhang, X. et al., “A New Writing Experience: Finger Writing in the Air Using a Kinect Sensor”, Multimedia at Work, University of Missouri, Jul. 2013, 9 pages. |
Zhang, J. et al., “Doppler-Radar Based Hand Festrue Recognition System Using Convolutional Neural Networks”, College of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, arXiv:1711.02254v3 [cs.CV] Nov. 22, 2017, 8 pages. |
Zhou, Z. et al., “Dynamic Gesture Recognition with a Terahertz Radar Based on Range Profile Sequences and Doppler Signatures”, School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sensors, Dec. 21, 2017, 15 pages. |
“BT24MTR11 Using BGT24MTR11 in Low Power Applications 24 GHz Rader,” Application Note AN341, Revision: Rev 1.0, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany, Dec. 2, 2013, 25 pages. |
Chen, Xiaolong et al., “Detection and Extraction of Marine Target with Micromotion via Short-Time Fractional Fourier Transform in Sparse Domain,” IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, ICSPCC, Aug. 5-8, 2016, 5 pages. |
Chuanhua, Du, “FMCW Radar Range-Doppler Processing and Beam Formation Technology,” Chinese Doctoral Dissertations & Master's Theses Full Text Database (Masters)—Information Science and Technology Series, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, ISSN 1674-0246, CN 11-9144/G, Dec. 16, 2004-Mar. 2015, 14 pages. |
Deacon, Peter et al., “Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Radar,” Design Team 6 Technical Lecture, Nov. 9, 2011, 27 pages. |
Dham, Vivek “Programming Chirp Parameters in TI Radar Devices,” Application Report SWRA553, Texas Instruments, May 2017, 15 pages. |
Diederichs, Kailtyn et al., “Wireless Biometric Individual Identification Utilizing Millimeter Waves”, IEEE Sensors Letters, vol. 1, No. 1, IEEE Sensors Council 3500104, Feb. 2017, 4 pages. |
Dooring Alert Systems, “Riders Matter,” http:\\dooringalertsystems.com, printed Oct. 4, 2017, 16 pages. |
Filippelli, Mario et al., “Respiratory dynamics during laughter,” J Appl Physiol, (90), 1441-1446, Apr. 2001, http://jap.physiology.org/content/jap/90/4/1441.full.pdf. |
Fox, Ben, “The Simple Technique That Could Save Cyclists' Lives,” https://www.outsideonline.com/2115116/simple-technique-could-save-cyclists-lives, Sep. 19, 2016, 6 pages. |
Gu, Changzhan et al., “Assessment of Human Respiration Patterns via Noncontact Sensing Using Doppler Multi-Radar System”, Sensors Mar. 2015, 15(3), 6383-6398, doi: 10.3390/s150306383, 17 pages. |
Guercan, Yalin “Super-resolution Algorithms for Joint Range-Azimuth-Doppler Estimation in Automotive Radars,” Technische Universitet Delft, TUDelft University of Technology Challenge the Future, Jan. 25, 2017, 72 pages. |
Inac, Ozgur et al., “A Phased Array RFIC with Built-In Self-Test Capabilities,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, No. 1, Jan. 2012, 10 pages. |
Killedar, Abdulraheem “XWR1xxx Power Management Optimizations—Low Cost LC Filter Solution,” Application Report SWRA577, Texas Instruments, Oct. 2017, 19 pages. |
Kizhakkel, V., “Pulsed Radar Target Recognition Based on Micro-Doppler Signatures Using Wavelet Analysis”, A Thesis, Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ohio State University, Jan. 2013-May 2013, 118 pages. |
Kuehnke, Lutz, “Phased Array Calibration Procedures Based on Measured Element Patterns,” 2001 Eleventh International Conference on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Conf., Publ. No. 480, Apr. 17-20, 2001, 4 pages. |
Lim, Soo-Chul et al., “Expansion of Smartwatch Touch Interface from Touchscreen to Around Device Interface Using Infrared Line Image Sensors,” Sensors 2015, ISSN 1424-8220, vol. 15, 16642-16653, doi:10.3390/s150716642, www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors, Jul. 15, 2009, 12 pages. |
Lin, Jau-Jr et al., “Design of an FMCW radar baseband signal processing system for automotive application,” SpringerPlus a SpringerOpen Journal, (2016) 5:42, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1583-5; Jan. 2016, 16 pages. |
Microwave Journal Frequency Matters, “Single-Chip 24 GHz Radar Front End,” Infineon Technologies AG, www.microwavejournal.com/articles/print/21553-single-chip-24-ghz-radar-front-end, Feb. 13, 2014, 2 pages. |
Qadir, Shahida G., et al., “Focused ISAR Imaging of Rotating Target in Far-Field Compact Range Anechoic Chamber,” 14th International Conference on Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology, ASAT-14-241-IP, May 24-26, 2011, 7 pages. |
Richards, Mark A., “Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing,” McGraw Hill Electronic Engineering, ISBN: 0-07-144474-2, Jun. 2005, 93 pages. |
Schroff, Florian et al., “FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering,” CVF, CVPR2015, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Mar. 12, 2015, pp. 815-823. |
Simon, W., et al., “Highly Integrated Ka-Band TX Frontend Module Including 8x8 Antenna Array,” IMST GmbH, Germany, Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Dec. 7-10, 2009, 63 pages. |
Suleymanov, Suleyman, “Design and Implementation of an FMCW Radar Signal Processing Module for Automotive Applications,” Master Thesis, University of Twente, Aug. 31, 2016, 61 pages. |
Thayananthan, T. et al., “Intelligent target recognition using micro-Doppler radar signatures,” Defence R&D Canada, Radar Sensor Technology III, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7308, 730817, Dec. 9, 2009, 11 pages. |
Thayaparan, T. et al., “Micro-Doppler Radar Signatures for Intelligent Target Recognition,” Defence Research and Development Canada, Technical Memorandum, DRDC Ottawa TM 2004-170, Sep. 2004, 73 pages. |
Wilder, Carol N., et al., “Respiratory patterns in infant cry,” Canada Journal of Speech, Human Communication Winter, 1974-75, http://cjslpa.ca/files/1974_HumComm_Vol_01/No_03_2-60/Wilder_Baken_HumComm_1974.pdf, pp. 18-34. |
Xin, Qin et al., “Signal Processing for Digital Beamforming FMCW Sar,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 859890, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/859890, 11 pages. |
Arsalan, Muhammad et al., “Character Recognition in Air-Writing Based on Network of Radars for Human-Machine Interface”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, No. 19, Oct. 1, 2019, 10 pages. |
Chuang, Cheng-Ta et al., “Applying the Kalman Filter to the Infrared-Based Touchless Positioning System with Dynamic Adjustment of Measurement Noise Features”, International Microsystems, Packaging Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference, Impact, IEEE Catalog No. CFP1459B-Art, ISBN 978-1-4799-7727-7, Oct. 22, 2014, 4 pages. |
Hazra, Souvik et al., “Robust Genre Recognition Using Millimeter-Wave Radar System”, IEEE Sensors Letters, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 2018, 4 pages. |
Leem, Seong Kyu et al., “Detecting Mid-Air Gestures for Digit Writing with Radio Sensors and a CNN”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69, No. 4, Apr. 2020, 16 pages. |
Molchanov, Pavlo et al., “Online Detection and Classification of Dynamic Hand Gestures with Recurrent 3D Convolutional Neural Networks”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 27, 2016, 10 pages. |
Wang, Saiwen et al., “Interacting with Soli: Exploring Fine-Grained Dynamic Gesture Recognition in the Radio-Frequency Spectrum”, ACM, Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 16-19, 2016, 10 pages. |
Yana, Buntueng et al., “Fusion Networks for Air-Writing Recognition”, International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Springer, XP047460334, ISBN: 978-3-642-17318-9, Jan. 13, 2018, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200302210 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |