Patent Grant
12139749
Applicant submits herewith a sequence listing in an ASCII text file (3815_10_7_seq_list.txt), as provided in EFS Legal Framework Notice 20 May 2010, part I-I-1. The file was created Nov. 30, 2015 and contains 875 bytes. Applicant incorporates the contents of the sequence listing by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to the field of electrochemical molecular detection, such as the detection of nucleic acid polymerization, by detection of a charged particle (e.g. proton) by means of a sensitive electrical circuit. The present invention has particular application to nucleic acid sequence detection and enzyme substrate modification detection.
Rapid, sequence-specific DNA detection is essential for applications in medical diagnostics and genetic screening. Electrochemical biosensors that use immobilized nucleic acids are especially promising in these applications because of their potential for miniaturization and automation. Current DNA detection methods based on hybridization rely on various optical, electrochemical or mass readouts. (Refs. 1, 2) However, direct, label-free electrochemical detection methods are not available.
A variety of electrochemical methods have been described, all of which detect direct electronic signals using various electrochemical reactions during DNA hybridization at the electrode surface. (Refs.1, 2, 6) In contrast, current detection and sequencing-by-synthesis technique requires the use of several enzymatic and photochemical steps. (Refs.7, 8) Thus a direct electrochemical detection method for this technique would greatly simplify the detection process and accelerate its implementation for rapid DNA sequencing and diagnostics. Described below is a label-free electrochemical detection method, Charge Perturbation Detection (CPD), applied to sequencing-by-synthesis.
Drummond, T. G., M. G. Hill, J. K. Barton, “Electrochemical DNA sensors,” Nat. Biotechnol. October; 21(10):1192¬9 (2003) report direct electrochemical techniques based on detection of electronic signals of electrochemical reactions of DNA or reporter molecules or enzymes recruited to the electrode surface by specific DNA probe-target interactions.
Ronaghi, M. “Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing,” Genome Res. Ian; 11 (1):3-11 (2001) discloses pyrosequencing detection methods using a bioluminometric detection in a three step reporter technique. The ultimate goal of these efforts is to discriminate individual nucleotides in a DNA molecule. Almost all these techniques use more than one-step electrochemical reaction to produce electronic signal. The CPD (Charge perturbation detection) method and device described below in contrast uses only one-step polymerase-catalyzed reaction to generate an electronic signal detecting a DNA nucleotide or sequence.
Pourmand et al. US 2002/0155476, published Oct. 24, 2002, describes a device for detecting a transient electrical signal in a sample. This device relies on a change in the potential difference between two electrodes when ions are added to a medium contacting the electrodes. A differential amplifier subtracts voltages from the two electrodes to produce the signal. The signal is generated in response to an electric field generated by the migration of ions towards the binding sites on one electrode, as shown in FIG. 2.3 of the publication.
The invention comprises a method and device for direct electrochemical detection of enzymatically catalyzed DNA synthesis by induced surface charge perturbation. Incorporation of a complementary nucleotide triphosphate (NTP) such as deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) into a self-primed single-stranded DNA attached to the surface of a high overpotential metal (e.g. gold) electrode evokes an electrode surface charge perturbation. This event can be detected as a transient current by a feed back (e.g. voltage-clamp) amplifier.
Based on current understanding of polarizable interfaces (Refs 3, 4) and without wishing to be bound by scientific theory, it is thought that the electrode detects the proton removal from the 3′-hydroxyl group of the DNA molecule during phosphodiester bond formation. (Ref 5).
Thus the present invention provides a device for detecting a chemical reaction of a selected, known reactant with a target molecule, wherein the reaction produces a charge perturbation on the target molecule. It need not be limited to DNA or other nucleic acid polymerization reactions. The chemical reaction may further provide structural information, such as a DNA or RNA sequence. It may provide information about the state of phosphorylation of a substrate, etc. The device comprises a container for containing reaction medium having therein reactants and target molecules. The container may be a well or a channel; the target molecules (e.g. DNA) may be chemically linked to the electrode, or simply in suspension near the electrode. Since the detection zone in the preferred embodiment has been determined to be about 30 m, the container should be scaled accordingly. The device further comprises a polarizable electrode in the container adjacent the target molecules. The electrode becomes polarized due to charge perturbation in the reaction mixture and target molecule. Further, an amplifying circuit for maintaining a set potential in the electrode and generating a signal in response to said charge perturbation; and a detector for detecting the signal, thereby indicating reaction of the selected, known reactant with the target molecule are provided. A voltage clamp amplifier is exemplified as providing sensitivity to very small charge differences. The device preferably comprises an amplifying circuit with a differential feedback amplifier having one input at a fixed voltage outside the container and another input attached to the electrode.
The amplifying circuit preferably has its negative input connected to the electrode, and the electrode is preferably gold, copper or silver.
The device may further comprise a self-assembled monolayer on the surface of the electrode, for providing insulation, which will facilitate polarization of the electrode. The self-assembled monolayer is preferably coupled to the target molecule, so that the charge perturbations on the target molecule occur within a zone that is detectible by the electrode.
As stated, in the preferred device, the electrode is insulated, and the target molecule is a polynucleic acid (e.g. DNA or RNA) linked to the polarizable electrode. The device may be fabricated as an array of a large number of reaction electrodes, each with a different target molecule (e.g. DNA template). This device comprises an addressable array of electrodes and fluid structures, or circuits addressing each electrode individually. Also, the device may comprise an addressable array of electrodes and fluid circuits addressing the array collectively. That is, the fluid circuits do not have to be designed to deliver separate reagents to each electrode. The same mixture (e.g. known dNTPs) can be delivered to each electrode with a target molecule attached. A semiconductor substrate is provided with integrated circuits for connections to electrodes and for the amplifying circuits and channels for the fluid circuits. Microfluidics may be used, and the channels for delivering reactants may comprise a polymer, e.g. poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and/or Poly (silarylene siloxane) (PSS).
The present invention further includes methods for fabricating such a device, and methods for using such a device.
The present device allows for direct detection of electric charge perturbations of the local environment by an electrode system. When used with immobilized DNA, it can uniquely identify a DNA sequence. The polymerization process generates local perturbations of charge in the solution near the electrode surface and induces a charge in the polarazible electrode. This event is detected as a transient current by a voltage clamp amplifier. Detection of single nucleotides in a sequence can be determined by dispensing individual dNTPs to the electrode solution and detecting the charge perturbations. Alternatively, multiple bases can be determined at the same time using a mix of all dNTPs with subsequent analysis of the resulting signal. The initial enzyme attachment to the DNA molecule can be detected prior to polymerization with a surface electrode capacitance measurement using the same voltage-clamp amplifier. This technique thus enables also the detection of enzyme-DNA interactions at the electrode surface.
Based on current understanding of polarizable interfaces, and without wishing to be bound by any particular scientific theory, it is believed that the electrode is polarized, i.e. has a potential difference between the exposed surface and the electrode, so that the negative charge appearing in excess at the gold electrode surface is inducing the charge of equal amount, but opposite in sign, on the other side of the interphase without crossing the interfacial region. A negative induced charge on the side of the electrode, which is not facing the solution would be detected and amplified by a voltage clamp amplifier. According to principles of electricity and magnetism, a charged object located in the vicinity of a conducting surface will cause electrons to move in the surface material even though there is no physical contact. This is illustrated in a simple electroscope, where a charged item held near foils causes them to separate. In this case, the charged item would be the target molecule (DNA) and the electrode would become charged and fed into the voltage clamp amplifier.
It is therefore possible to detect DNA sequences of target molecules by the present Charge Perturbation Detection system by measuring characteristic transient current events by a voltage clamp amplifier. Signal or pattern recognition analysis of these events can be used to determine the sequence of target molecules or identifies the target molecule itself.
Four different principal methods used by this technique are:
A further aspect of this invention is the use of electrode coating with various layers to enable detection of DNA sequence by Charge Perturbation Detection system. The coating also enables and creates conditions for tethering a probe/template molecule to the electrode surface.
The use of a template is designed to allow specificity of the reaction, as according to well-known rules of base pairing (Watson Crick pairing), A binds to T or U and G binds to C. The rapid and sensitive detection of nucleic acids in a sample can provide a point-of-care diagnostic device that can test a patient's sample for the presence of specific known pathogens and determine the proper course of treatment. This can also be useful for current research applications that use DNA microarrays for readout. Instead of labeling test samples with fluorescent molecules and hybridizing the DNA to microarrays, the samples can be hybridized to electrode surface and detected with this system. This would result in faster and more accurate quantitative data with multiple sequence detection in one test.
Charge Perturbation Detection of DNA Sequence Polymerization Concept: Introduction and Overview
The device described in detail below demonstrate that the electrical signal created by polymerization of nucleic acids, and other biochemical reactions is detectable and can be easily acquired using commercial electronic components. Without extensive optimization, the sensitivity of the prototype was superior to that of commonly used optical detection systems such as real-time PCR systems.
CPD (Charge Perturbation Detection) technology does not require modified nucleotides or marker molecules to detect polymerization signals. Through application of sensors that are implemented in CMOS technology, individual polymerization steps can be detected in real time and easily processed. Not only does CPD avoid costly labels and specialized readout equipment, but as noted above, preliminary results suggest that CPD is also more sensitive. Because target DNA can be detected at concentrations below 10 fmol, the present system does not need amplification of target DNA. Experimental systems have been fabricated that can detect 1-10 femtomoles (1-10×10−15 moles) of DNA, an order of magnitude higher detection sensitivity than commercial pyrosequencing or single-base extension technologies.
The underlying principle of CPD is the detection of the transient current that is generated by the immobilization of charged molecules onto a measurement electrode. In the case of DNA detection, transient current is generated by proton removal as a complementary deoxynucleotide-triphosphate (dNTP), incorporated into a nascent strand on the measurement electrode (upon which the target is immobilized with a probe that acts as a primer), and accompanied by proton removal during biomolecular reaction. The current signal is detected by the measurement electrode. A characteristic current waveform is generated that can be interpreted in terms of the polymerization rate of the participating dNTP molecules. The resulting electrical signal is transient and is not present once the polymerization reaction is complete (i.e., over time, the rate of change in net charge becomes zero).
CPD differs from traditional electrochemical measurement techniques where the applied potential difference speeds up the rate of oxidation or reduction in order to sense the rate of diffusion of a reactant in the vicinity of the electrode surface. Our sensor applies a constant zero potential to the measurement electrode through a feedback loop to compensate for accumulated charge at the electrode surface and to prevent diffusion of equilibrating counter-ions. The CPD detection method actively senses transient current that results from changes in the electrical charge during chemical reactions in the solution. The chemical reactions that are detected are near, but not at the electrode/solution interface, and no charge flows through the interface. Using the example of the incorporation of dNTPs, the signal is subsequently converted into a current signal by a high-gain voltage-clamp amplifier. Upon sequential additions and washouts of individual dNTPs, nucleotide sequence peaks will appear as is shown in a sequence poly-gram (
The detection mechanism of the CPD devices are based on the charge conservation principle, where the increase of the total negative charge on the DNA molecules is exactly compensated by an increase of the total positive charge in the solution resulting from an increase of proton concentration. Each of these electrical charges induces a surface charge, opposite in sign, on the coated, electrically isolated but highly polarizable, gold electrode. The magnitude of any induced charge is a function of the electrode surface geometry and the distance between the electrode and the inducing charge. For electrodes used in these experiments, the magnitude of the induced charge is effectively constant for separation distances in the range of ˜1 nm up to ˜30 μm (the detection zone), and steeply decreases for distances >30 μm (
As discussed below in connection with
In one embodiment, a prefabricated electrode matrix was used for DNA immobilization. The electrically active 1×2 cm Au chips (shown in
For the initial experiments, single-stranded DNA molecules (76 bases) with different sequences were chemically synthesized with a thiol modification on the 5′-terminus and HPLC purified by MWG Biotech (High points, NC, USA). The DNA sequences were designed to self-prime with a 19 base-pair self-complementary sequence at the 5′-end of the DNA. Approximately 40 bases of the DNA sequence are single stranded and extendable by DNA polymerase.
Self-priming, single-stranded DNA molecules were immobilized on the surface of a gold electrode through a thiol-reactive self-assembled monolayer (SAM). The electrode was equilibrated with 10 units of the Klenow (exo) fragment (KF) of DNA polymerase.
The dNTPs used in the present system do not require any type of labeling, nor is any reporter molecule used in the present system. This prevents problems associated with different incorporation parameters for labeled dNTPs. Readouts of sequences of various lengths are thus possible.
With no measurable delay, current rises to a peak of ˜400 picoamps (pA) within ˜50 milliseconds (ms), rapidly decreases to ˜50 pA, and then shows a further, slower transient increase to ˜150 pA within 300 ms. The current transient is almost completed at 1 second (<5% of peak current). The integral of the measured current is 87 picocoulombs (pA·s), corresponding to nucleotide incorporation to −6.0×1011 DNA molecules per cm2 of the electrode. In contrast, if a solution containing a non-complementary dNTP was added, no current transient was observed (
Fabrication of Gold Chips
Electrically active 1×2 cm Au chips were manufactured using a semiconductor processing technique on a 4-inch wafer at the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility (SNF) (http://snf.stanford.edu). The pairs of electrodes on the Au chips were arranged so that each electrode pair was orthogonal to the adjacent pair, forming a generally square pattern of electrodes. Eight parallel leads were formed, extending from each electrode to the edge of the chip. The process requires only a single mask, designed on an industry-standard CAD program and produced on a piece of Mylar thin-film. A 500 μm-thick quartz layer is used as the substrate. The process flow is as follows: A very thin layer of chromium is first deposited to improve the adhesion between gold and quartz. Next, a 1000 Å thick gold layer is deposited to define the pattern for both the electrodes and the connecting pads. The minimum feature size of this chip is 200 μm. To prevent contamination after processing, a 7-μm-thick photoresist is used as a protection layer. After dicing, the photoresist is washed off with acetone and isopropanol. The chips consisted of four pairs of rectangular gold electrodes that were 0.09 mm2 with 0.5 mm center-to-center spacing. Other areas on the chip were used for the connection pads to external devices.
Surface Modification
All reagents used for surface modification were of reagent grade and used as received from Aldrich unless otherwise stated. The patterned quartz chips were cleaned in an RCA cleaning solution (H2O:NH4OH: 30% H2O2, 5:1:1, v/v/v) for 15 min at 70° C., immersed in a water bath for 10 min and dried in a stream of argon. The quartz surface was coated with a hydrophobic octadecyltriethoxysilane (Gelest, Morrisville, PA) in an anhydrous toluene solution containing 1% (v) silane and 2% (v) hexanoic acid for 24 hr at room temperature. Silanized chips were washed twice with toluene and once with ethanol for 5 min each, and dried in a stream of argon. The silanization step was performed to make the quartz surface hydrophobic and thereby avoid cross contamination between gold electrodes in close proximity to each other during spotting.
The gold electrodes were coated with a long-chain thiol to form a densely packed monolayer (a self-assembled monolayer [SAM]), which displaces any physisorbed silanes (Refs. 25, 26), i.e. silanes physically absorbed on the surface. The silane-coated chips were immediately immersed in a 1 mM solution of mercaptoundecanol (MUD) in ethanol for at least 16 hr. The gold substrates were removed from the thiol solution, washed with ethanol, and dried under an argon stream. The hydroxyl-terminated monolayer was transformed into a thiol-reactive moiety by exposure to a 2.3 mM solution of N-(p-maleimidophenyl) isocyanates (PMPI, Pierce, Rockford I L) in anhydrous toluene at 40° C. for 2 hr under an argon atmosphere. (Refs. 27,28)
Suitable long chain thiols for linking to the electrode surface and the test molecule (DNA strand) are generally between about 3 to 24 carbon long. Generally, the electrode has bound to it an SAM linked to the electrode at a thiol group at one end; a long chain alkyl group, and a linker group for attachment to a nucleic acid (DNA) at the other end. A suitable linker group is PMPI.
Other suitable SAMs are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,652,398, hereby incorporated by reference for purposes of describing SAMs containing phytanylthiol. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,623 to Everhart, et al., issued Apr. 11, 2000, entitled “Method of contact printing on gold coated films,” incorporated by reference for further description of suitable SAMs, the self-assembling monolayer may have the following general formula:
X—R—Y where X reacts with the metal (gold) electrode, R is a linear or branched alkyl or polymer backbone; and Y reacts with a nucleic acid, e.g. a thiol functionalized DNA. The DNA linkage may be through a phosphate to a sulfur group on a PMPI linker. The PMPI linker is attached to the SAM and to the DNA. PMPI (N-[p-Maleimidophenyl]isocyanate) is useful because both hydroxyl and sulfhydryl reactivity can be found in this cross-linker. Maleimide reacts with —SH groups at pH 6.5-7.5, forming stable thioether linkages. Isocyanate reacts with —OH groups to form a carbamate link at pH 8.5. It is an excellent tool for conjugating —OH group-containing compounds.
X is designed to be reactive with metal or metal oxide. For example, X may be asymmetrical or symmetrical disulfide (—R′SSR, —RSSR), sulfide (—R′SR, —RSR), diselenide (—R′Se—SeR), selenide (—R′SeR, —RSeR), thiol (—SH), NH2, nitrile (—CN), isonitrile, nitro (—NO.sub.2), selenol (—SeH), trivalent phosphorous compounds, isothiocyanate, xanthate, thiocarbamate, phosphine, thioacid or dithioacid, carboxylic acids, hydroxylic acids, and hydroxamic acids.
Maleimide-modified gold electrodes were washed with anhydrous toluene and dried in a stream of argon. The various surface modification steps were followed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (data not shown) and the presence of the expected elements and peak shifts confirmed the proper transformation of both surface components.
An SAM may also be formed of polymers that bind to gold and or other electrode materials. For example, Major, et al. “Strategies for Covalent Multilayer Growth,” Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 2574-2581 describes a strategy for the covalent assembly of polymer multilayers at interfaces, where growth is accomplished one layer at a time. The individual layer constituents are maleimidevinyl ether alternating copolymers with side groups that possess reactive functionalities. The identity of the polymer layer side groups determines the chemistry employed in interlayer linkage formation. It is reported there that one may carry out the selective creation of amide, ester, ether, urea, and urethane interlayer linkages.
The SAM serves to provide insulation for the electrode and to prevent non-specific adhesion of DNA to the electrode. The SAM facilitates the orientation of the DNA in a parallel linkage to the substrate.
Immobilization of DNA
The thiolated oligonucleotides were diluted to a final concentration of 10 μM in 0.1M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, with 10 μM dithiothreitol (DTT) and incubated at least 1 hour at room temperature. Immobilization of the reduced thiolated oligonucleotides onto the electrodes was performed manually by deposition of 0.2 μl reduced oligonucleotides followed by overnight incubation at room temperature in a humidified chamber.
Design, Synthesis and Purification of Oligonucleotides
Single-stranded DNA molecules (76 bases) with different sequences were chemically synthesized with a thiol modification on the 5′-terminus and HPLC purified by MWG Biotech (High points, NC, USA). The DNA sequences were designed to self-prime with a 19 base-pair self-complementary sequence at the 5′-end of the DNA. Approximately 40 bases of the DNA sequence are single stranded and extendable by DNA polymerase. The oligonucleotide used in the experiment (
Prototype Sensor System
In a typical charge-based sensor system, a prefabricated electrode matrix is used for DNA immobilization. The electrodes were fabricated as described above. The CPD electrode chip that was used in these experiments is further described in the section “fabrication of gold chips.”. The electrode surface was submersed in a standard DNA polymerization buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 25 mM KCl and 1.25 mM MgCl2) with DNA polymerase (10U, Klenow fragment). Polymerization was initiated by adding a 21 aliquot containing 20 mM of dNTP substrate (to give 1 mM final concentration of dNTP in 40 μl buffer).
Electrical Measurement Method
For measurements of electrical activity of the CPD electrode was used an Axopatch 200B voltage-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). The Axopatch amplifier was used in the whole-cell voltage clamp mode with the holding potential at 0 mV. The high-impedance coating of the CPD measurement electrode prevents the occurrence of faradaic current that could otherwise cause interference or the deterioration of the sensor and analytes. A reference Ag/AgCl electrode of the voltage-clamp amplifier was immersed directly in the bathing solution during measurements.
Other Amplifier Designs
A voltage clamp amplifier may described generically as a differential feedback amplifier having one input at a fixed voltage outside the container and another input attached to the electrode. Many general-purpose op amp chips have two or four separate operational amplifiers in one package, with common power supply connections. In practice the ideal amplifier criteria requirements are met only approximately, but as will be shown, close enough for most purposes. Practically, an op amp will have a gain of 10,000 or more, an input impedance of megohms, and a 3 dB bandwidth of several tens of hertz or more. If an amplifier has a 3 dB bandwidth of 40 Hz and a gain of 100,000 times, this is a gain bandwidth product of 4 million hertz, or 4 MHz (40×100,000). It is advantageous in many feedback applications to have the gain falling at 6 dB per octave or 20 dB per decade at frequencies beyond the corner frequency (that frequency at which the amplifier gain has fallen 3 dB or 70.7 percent of its DC value). Since the op amp is used in mainly in feedback circuits having much lower closed loop gain, these performance figures are good enough in many cases. In fact, even a single high gain (100×) common emitter transistor amplifier stage can be treated as an op amp if feedback is employed, with surprisingly little error. In many cases a single transistor will work almost as well as a more expensive op amp device. One example is a simple audio amplifier stage from which a moderate gain (5-20×) is required.
Radiolabeling
Radioactive labeling and phosphor imaging techniques were used as process controls to quantify the oligonucleotide attachment and subsequent hybridization reactions.29 [a-32P] dCTP (Pharmacia) was used for 3′ labeling of the attached self-primed probes via single-base extension. Specific activities of the radiolabeled oligos were determined by liquid scintillation counting using an LS 7500 liquid scintillation system (Beckman Inc., Columbia, MD). Standard curves were made from a serial dilution of known amounts of the 32P-labeled nucleotides used in the experiments. The data presented here represent the averages of, minimally, three replicate points.
As described below, the charge perturbation in the vicinity of the electrode is detected by a voltage clamp amplifier 18 having a negative lead 20 connected to the electrode 12 and a positive lead connected to a command voltage source 22. Feedback resistor 24 serves to eliminate current output whenever the command voltage is equal to the reference voltage at the measurement electrode. When a small charge perturbation occurs at the electrode 12, an amplified, transient signal 26 is produced. A reference electrode, which does not have a template DNA strand attached to the electrode structure can be also provided (but is not required). The reference electrode is connected to a similar op amp 18a with feedback resistor 24a to provide a reference signal for comparison against the transient signals from the reaction electrode.
Prior to the start of the polymerization reactions, a DNA template is immobilized on a coated electrode surface. DNA polymerization requires the hybridization of a sequencing primer to this strand, so that DNA polymerization with attached enzyme can proceed with dNTP dispensations to the electrode solution and the sequence of the template strand can be detected. The system can also be designed to detect the hybridization of a template strand that is specific for a sample to be analyzed, in which case the sequence of the template strand is already known and the reaction detects the presence of a complementary primer strand in the sample to be analyzed.
DNA polymerase catalyzes the incorporation of complementary nucleotides, resulting in perturbations of local electrical charge. Perturbations are based on interactions of system components and release of products of polymerization. These local perturbations of charge in solution induce a charge in coated polarazible gold Charge Perturbation Detection system (CPD) electrode. This event is detected as a transient current by voltage clamp amplifier, which compensates induced charge in the gold electrode. The high-impedance coating prevents faradaic current that could deteriorate the sensor and analytes. For measurements of electrical activity of CPD electrode was used Axopatch 200B voltage clamp amplifier, but in principle any voltage-clamp amplifier can be used. Voltage command was kept at steady 0 mV holding potential, but because no faradaic current is present the voltage command can be kept on different holding potentials and can be used for various purposes in the final system. For example, a specific voltage can repel various polymerization products or ions and “clean” the surface of the electrode for next polymerization steps.
Capacitance Measurement
Measurement of the electrode capacitance is used to detect attachment of an enzyme to the DNA located at the surface of the electrode. This step will easily eliminate problematic electrodes and speed up measurement of electrodes with correct enzyme/DNA interaction. Capacitance increase of electrode interface is probably caused by the change of DNA dielectric layer due to the enzyme attachment to the DNA. If there is a problem of enzyme/DNA attachment or in the electrode surface chemistry fabrication (e.g. thickness of coated layers) then no significant increase in capacitance is observed even all components are present in the solution. Increase of capacitance in current version of electrodes (size, layers, enzyme, buffer concentration, DNA density) is about 5-6 fold and can depend on mentioned parameters. Without wishing to be bound by one theory as to the cause of this effect, it is thought that target molecules (DNA strands) with attached enzyme “stand up,” i.e. are aligned away from the electrode, allowing solution to be closer to the SAM, effectively making the dielectric thinner.
Measurement of capacitance is based on applying small (e.g. ±2 mV) triangle-wave voltage command to the electrode and detecting response square-wave current recalculated to capacitance by equation: C=I/(dV/dt). Measurement of electrode capacitance enables also detection of general interactions of enzymes with the target molecule (DNA) located at the surface of the electrode.
If the addition of individual dNTPs is performed sequentially, then nucleotide sequence peaks will appear as shown in a sequence poly-gram (
In
Fabrication of a “CPD chip” (Charge perturbation detection chip) on a glass wafer is illustrated in
In step 410, the gold electrode is cleaned with a standard cleaning process:
In step 420, a silane layer is applied to areas surrounding the electrode. In step 430, a self-assembled monolayer is attached to the electrode areas where the DNA template will be immobilized. Next in situ formation is carried out in step 440. This creates a reactive group for the attachment of a sulfur-containing DNA strand in step 460. That is, after attaching the monolayer 442 linked to the gold, a layer of PM-I-N-(pMaleimidophenyl) isocynate 444 is used to attach covalently thiol modified DNA 462 to the PMPI.
CPD electrodes coated as described above may be placed into a holder in order to contain the chip and provide fluid paths and electrical connections. Electrode output is connected to the Axopatch 200B amplifier or equivalent voltage-clamp device (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The sample solution (e.g. 40 μl), consisting of buffer (5 mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.3 (at 25° C.); 25 mM KCl and 1.5 mM MgCl2) is dispensed into an electrode chamber.
Self-priming, single-stranded DNA molecules were immobilized on the surface of a gold electrode through a thiol-reactive self-assembled monolayer (SAM). The electrode was equilibrated with 10 units of the Klenow (exo-) fragment (KF) of DNA polymerase.
Initial capacitance of the electrode was measured by triangle-wave voltage, as described above under “Capacitance Measurement.” A sawtooth waveform is applied to the command voltage. Then polymerase enzyme (e.g.2 μl) is introduced to the solution. After several minutes, electrode capacitance is measured. Correct attachment of enzyme is confirmed by increase of electrode capacitance. The amount of increase depends from the size of electrode and DNA density and should be several times higher than initial capacitance without enzyme (e.g. 5×). Finally individual dNTPs, or a mixture of dNTPs, are rapidly dispensed to the solution. Speed of diffusion and dispensation should be in the range of several milliseconds in order to avoid disturbance of following polymerization reaction. Piezo-spray dispensation triggered by computer (piezo, RJ315 with Sone-Tek generator) was used for dispensation, but some other fast-perfusion system with for example air-pressure spritzer can be used as replacement (e.g. Spritzer-8 8-Channel Micro Injector—Spritzer from BioSciense Tools, Inc.). Concentration of dNTPs can be scaled according to signal sensitivity. Signal to noise ratio is based on size of the electrode, DNA density, solution concentration, etc.). We used for example 5 mM-20 mM sol of dNTP.
Transient ionic current is recorded using the Axopatch 200B amplifier in voltage-clamp mode with signal filtering at 5-10 kHz bandwidth. The signal is further digitized by an Axon Digidata 1320A digitizer with sampling frequencies from 10 kHz to 500 kHz. The data is recorded using Clampex 8 (Axon Instruments), and the same software is used for basic signal analysis.
The signal resulting from the addition of a solution containing a single dNTP (1 mM concentration in final solution volume) complementary to the nucleotide in the template sequence rises to a peak of about 400 picoamps (pA) within ˜50 milliseconds (ms), rapidly decreases to ˜50 pA, and then shows a further, slower transient increase to ˜150 pA within 300 ms. The current transient is almost completed at 1 second (<5% of peak current). The integral of the measured current is 87 picocoulombs (pA·s), corresponding to nucleotide incorporation to ˜6.0×1011 DNA molecules per cm2 of the electrode. In contrast, if a solution containing a noncomplementary dNTP was added, no current transient was observed. No signal was produced when the complementary dNTP was added in the absence of DNA polymerase, in the absence of DNA, or if DNA was not immobilized on the electrode surface (data not shown; see priority provisional). The lack of detectable signal in the control experiments demonstrates the clear dependence of the current transient on the complementarity of the actual nucleotide, and on the simultaneous presence of Klenow fragment (KF) and immobilized DNA. The current waveform observed can therefore be attributed to the signal resulting from the incorporation of the nucleotide into the primer strand. The DNA polymerase-catalyzed elongation of the synthesized strand proceeds by the SN2 (bimolecular nucleophilic substitution) mechanism that has been extensively studied. (Refs.9, 10, 11). Upon the incorporation of each nucleotide, the total negative electrical charge on the DNA molecule undergoes a net increase of 1e−, produced by the removal of a proton from the 3′-OH group of the DNA primer during the catalytic step of the reaction. (Ref. 12).
Due to the principle of charge conservation, the increase of the total negative charge on the DNA molecules is exactly compensated by an increase of the total positive charge in the solution resulting from an increase of proton concentration. Each of these electrical charges induces a surface charge, opposite in sign, (Refs.3, 4) on the coated, electrically isolated but highly polarizable, gold electrode. The magnitude of any induced charge is a function of the electrode surface geometry and the distance between the electrode and the inducing charge. For electrodes used in these experiments, the magnitude of the induced charge is effectively constant for separation distances in the range of −1 nm up to −30 μm (the detection zone), and steeply decreases for distances >30 μm (
The charges on the DNA molecule attached to the electrode are locally fixed in close proximity to the electrode surface (<100 nm), while the protons released from DNA are free to diffuse in the solution. For the duration of the experiment (˜1 s), the diffusion distance of protons is >136 μm (the diffusion coefficient of proton DH+ in water is 9.3×10−5 cm2/s) (Ref. 13). Lateral proton diffusion might be significantly faster due to specific surface hydration of the electrode and the surrounding silane layer. (Refs. 14,15) The protons are thus able to diffuse far enough to produce a change of the net charge in the detection zone due to the immobilized negative charge on the DNA backbone. This event induces a charge sensed by the polarizable electrode. Since the electrode is held at a constant potential, the charge induced by an individual molecule results in a small pulse of current in the electrode. The sum of these current pulses from all DNA molecules attached to the electrode surface produces a large transient current detected by the voltage-clamp amplifier. Ideally, the measured current is equal to the time rate of change in net charge within the detection zone during the reaction, expressed by the equation I(t)=dQ(t)/dt (where Q is charge, I is current and t is time). To evaluate actual efficiency of signal transduction we measured surface DNA density by polymerization of radiolabeled dCTP, as discussed above, indicating that DNA polymerization with as little as 1 fmole of DNA on a single electrode could be detected. Less than 1 fmole of DNA could be used as a template if a smaller electrode were used. To gain further insight into the mechanisms underlying CPD during a single step of the KF-catalyzed reaction, the kinetics of the reaction were studied. (Refs. 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21)
The kinetic scheme based on these studies is shown in
Thus, the incoming dNTP molecule, complexed with one Mg2+ ion, (Ref. 22) increases the negative charge by 2e−. Incorporation of the catalytic Mg2+ ion (Ref 23) decreases the negative charge by 2e− (1) Incorporation of nucleotide (2) then increases a negative charge by 1e− on the new backbone phosphate group (3), produced by removal of a proton from the 3′-OH group of the DNA primer during the catalytic step of the reaction (Ref. 12), followed by rapid diffusion of the proton into the surrounding solution (4). The change in the induced charge (5) can be detected by the electrode as a transient current (6) measured by a voltage-clamp amplifier (7). The diffusion distance of low-molecular-weight compounds (Mg2+, MgdNTP2−, MgPPi2−) in solution during the time course of the experiment (1 s) is approximately an order of magnitude slower than proton diffusion (Ref. 24). For this reason the charge changes induced by most of the reaction steps (binding of the dNTP molecule, complexed with one Mg2+ ion, incorporation of the catalytic Mg2+ ion, dissociation of the catalytic Mg2+ ion and of the leaving Mg2+-bound pyrophosphate) do not produce a measurable electrode response. On the same basis, the Brownian motion of ions in the solution as well as conformational changes of the immobilized enzyme and DNA molecules does not produce changes in the induced charge.
Sample kinetic rates, using the notation of
Based on this kinetic model, a simulation was performed to confirm whether this underlying mechanism accounts for the signal dynamics observed. The initial enzyme-DNA binding step was assumed to be in equilibrium during the simulation, since the enzyme was incubated for more than 2 minutes with the DNA attached to the electrode in the experiments. The published rate constants of individual reaction steps were used as the starting point of simulations, with the exception of step 3 and 5, for which we found no published KF rate constants. We approximated these steps with Kd˜100 μM based on the published rate constants for DNA polymerase β (Ref. 19). We achieved a best fit between model and experimental signals by adjustment of selected kinetic rates (in particular, k6, k−6, k7, k−7 were changed somewhat from the previously published values to account for different experimental conditions) (Refs. 20, 9). Using Arndt's model (Ref. 21), an approximation for the rate of binding of Mg2+ and with the adjusted rate constants, we have recreated the key features of the signal dynamics, mainly the timing of the peaks of polymerization, which closely match in both the simulation and the experiment.
In summary, the charge perturbation detection concept is based on the charge conservation principle and the induced surface charge of the polarizable electrode. As a result, the immobilized negative charge accumulated on the DNA backbone can be detected as soon as the positive proton leaves the detection zone, which occurs in a relatively short period. In principle, DNA synthesis confined to the detection zone could be detected without DNA immobilization, since the protons diffuse faster than the DNA molecules. The described label-free detection method can be easily applied to a multiple-electrode system and can provide rapid and sensitive detection of biological pathogens, genetic mutations or identification of unknown DNA sequences with a very small amount of sample. In addition, it also enables general measurements of enzymes undergoing similar catalytic reactions. The CPD electrode thus potentially represents a very robust and effective biosensor for many molecular and diagnostic applications.
Multi-electrode DNA detection can target a specific list of DNA sequences, such as for example DNA mutations of a pathogen. The concept is shown in
In the second panel of
Appropriate primers may be made by standard PCR protocol. Due to the sensitive nature of the present method, less than about 10 femtomol of primer is needed per electrode. However, more primers may be added to a single electrode to facilitate assembly.
In addition, multiple primers for different regions of DNA for a single target (e.g. different HPV6 genes) may be added to a single electrode to improve sensitivity. Multiple-electrode chips can find specific mutations in one-step run-off polymerization or by sequential dispensations and detection of individual nucleotides.
Referring now to
The electrode array is electrically connected via solder balls to the CMOS semiconductor chip. The electrode array is constructed on a quartz, glass or silicon wafer. The sensors, amplifiers and signal routing will be embedded in the CMOS chip and the output signal will be accessible via a pad and/or solder ball.
An exemplary integrated detection device is illustrated in
When larger numbers of functional areas and a small device size is desired, one may use a modified microarray contact printer equipped with a digital camera and controlling software for precise solution delivery to the individual electrodes. Alignment of the contact pins with the electrodes will require some calibration and testing to ensure proper alignment. Testing may be done by optical image processing.
Another critical issue is the surface chemistry and attachment of the DNA. During the fabrication process, an oxide layer can form that prevents efficient attachment of the DNA oligonucleotides. Using electrical measurements of surface capacitance, as described above, one may determine the efficiency of attachment of the DNA-enzyme complex. Alternative methods include semi-manual dispensing of reagents by Piezo spray and XPS analysis to ensure that the chip is functional.
A microfluidic device according to the present invention may employ an automated method comprised of two components to accomplish a fast perfusion of buffer for equilibration and washing, and a more accurate dispensing of reagents.
The fast perfusion (˜100 ms) of polymerization buffer in a desktop unit may be done with a Valvelink 8.2 controller and pinch valves (Automated Scientific Inc., CA), controlled by computer with an National Instruments (NI) 6225 board. The accurate injection (˜10 ms) of 1-2 μl of dNTPs to the CPD electrode is performed with calibrated glass micropipettes connected to an eight-channel Micro Injector-Spritzer (BioScience Tools, CA) and positioned closely to the CPD electrode with a multi-electrode holder (BioScience Tools) and MM-33 micromanipulator.
For final assembly of the automated desktop system, the newly functionalized and tested chip will be connected to the reagent dispensing system. The chip will be placed in a prefabricated chip-holder that is connected to the multiple voltage-clamp amplifiers (Dagan, Inc.).
For sensor data acquisition, commercially available data acquisition boards and software packages from National Instruments are used. Their LabView software package can be used for any necessary processing on the PC. The NI 6225 board will be used. The NI 6225 can sample 16 single-ended channels at a rate of 15.6 kHz per channel. The board allows to be multiplexed so that up to 80 channels can be sampled at a rate of 3.1 kHz.
The DNA probe is first printed on the electrode chip and inserted into the device. The solution containing the target is added and allowed to hybridize to the probe (not shown). Then solution buffer (50 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Mg), and DNA polymerase is introduced into the electrode chamber at the beginning of each measurement cycle. The individual dNTPs are dispensed sequentially (one dNTP per cycle) to the solution by using the fast perfusion/dispensation system. Transient ionic current signal in each cycle is detected using the voltage-clamp amplifier and digitized by computer acquisition board to produce the sequence polygram.
Microfluidic technology to deliver analytes and other small volumes of liquid can be adapted to a larger (e.g. an 8×8) biosensor array. The technology has sub-micron alignment precision of the microfluidic channels on top of the biosensor array. Furthermore, the microfluidic technology is compatible with materials that cannot withstand etching, elevated temperatures, or high electric fields.
Suitable microfluidic technology is formed of two layers and contains microfluidic channels interconnected with 8 parallel channels. Each channel runs over 8 sensors. The electrical wires and contacts are arrayed orthogonally to the microfluidic channels. The microfluidic channels may be designed to deliver the same mixture of reactants, or sequential reactants, to each electrode, or, with more fabrication, to provide individual channels for delivering different reactants to different electrodes.
Each of the 64 sensors can be measured independently. A thick top layer, fabricated by soft lithography from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and backed by a transparent glass wafer, defines the larger microfluidic structures, such as inlet and outlet channels. Small microfluidic structures that would be difficult to create and align if they were included in the PDMS layer are instead defined in a thin layer of SiO2, which has been deposited by ion beam deposition (IBD) and patterned by a lift-off process on top of the existing biosensor array. The combination of IBD and lift-off is compatible with the delicate biosensors and provides photolithographic alignment precision and feature definition of the channels in the SiO2 layer. Moreover, the IBD-deposited SiO2 layer provides spontaneous adhesion and sealing to the top PDMS layer and will accommodate a significant amount of substrate topography. Large channel overlaps between the two layers make the alignment of the top PDMS layer to the substrate error-tolerant. Finite element simulations are used to optimize the two-layer geometry for high analytic sensitivity and low flow impedance.
Microfluidic channels are formed as channels in parallel in one direction, e.g. from top to bottom of integrated device. Then, the electrodes to the sensor points would go from left to right. The sensor locations are at the intersection of the microfluidic channels and electrodes, forming an 8×8 array.
Fluidic channels down to approximately 2 um width have been created with good edge definition in a 250 nanometer thick SiO2 layer, spanning 5 μm across a sensor area between intersections with larger channels in the PDMS layer.
Referring now to
DNA is applied at the wafer level by selecting a particular DNA solution for each electrode. Details of the biofunctionalization chemistry are described above.
For a compact charge perturbation device, the electrode size is preferably about 0.3 mm by 0.3 mm, which can be accommodated by existing assembly devices. The 0.3 mm electrode size can be scaled down to micrometer scale electrode with the use of semiconductor processing technology and microfluidics.
The microfluidic channel is sealed with a quartz sheet 828 on top of the PDMS layer 826. The channel is thus defined by a bottom surface containing DNA molecules adjacent an electrode; sidewalls comprising a deposited polymeric layer; and a top sheet confining liquid containing a sample to be analyzed and analytical reagents (e.g. polymerase, dNTPs, etc.) Two channels are illustrated in
An integrated circuit version of the CPD sensor using CMOS technology has several advantages over a version built from off-the-shelf components. First, it has increased detection sensitivity and increased signal-to-noise ratio because it can be optimized for low-noise operation. Second, it can be cheaper in volume production than a version built with off-the-shelf components. Third, it can be smaller than a version built with off-the-shelf components.
The signal-detection circuitry consists of two stages. The first stage is a voltage-clamp amplifier 910, which amplifies and converts current to voltage. The second stage 912 is used for output sampling in order to reduce noise. It performs a correlated double sampling of the first stage output. The correlated double sampling technique commonly used in digital cameras and in image sensor technology, cancels the low frequency 1/f noise, which is introduced by the first stage amplifier. Low frequency 1/f noise is inversely proportional to frequency so that the lower the frequency, the stronger the noise component. In commercial CMOS processes, the 1/f noise becomes equal to flat white noise in the kHz range. By canceling the 1/f noise with the correlated double-sampling technique, sensor sensitivity can be significantly improved by an order of magnitude.
The charge integrating amplifier 914 contains a ground and an input 916, along with a feed back resistor R, as is standard in voltage clamp amplifiers. The circuit further comprises a capacitor C for charge integration and a feed back switch Φ1. The output of the charge amplifier is input to either a positive or negative input to an amplifier 918. Switches Φ2 and Φ3 connect the charge amplifier to the differential amplifier. The switches D1-3 operate sequentially, i.e. one is on, then two is on, then three is on. This provides an over frequency to the output to be amplified, and, as explained above, lowers noise levels.
The amplifiers are designed using transistors in standard topologies and are optimized for low noise. Optimization of the charge-integrating amplifier circuit is possible after the impedance of the ssDNA-modified electrode is measured. Optimization will primarily consist of selection of the feedback impedance in the charge amplifier to maximize signal gain.
Integrated circuit design and verification software are indispensable parts of the design process. The basic software tools are schematic capture, parasitic extraction, circuit simulation, mask layout, and design verification. Industry-standard software is available for such uses, e.g. as provided by Cadence Design Systems for schematic capture, mask design, parasitic extraction, and design verification. The software HSpice may be used for circuit simulation.
Differential Amplifiers
The present devices utilize amplifiers that can detect small differences of charge at their inputs. The classic design for such an amplifier is the “voltage clamp” design illustrated here. An op-amp with no feedback (i.e. no resistors 24, 24a in
The sensitivity of the present CPD system enables the detection of other reactions besides DNA polymerization. Polymerization of other nucleic acids may also be detected in a sequence specific manner. The system may be used to detect binding of RNA to DNA, or double stranded RNA molecules found RNAi and ribozyme constructs. Furthermore, other biological molecular reactions generate more or less charged products, which can be detected using the described devices.
For example, the cleavage or unfolding of a polypeptide to expose charged arginine, lysine, histidine, aspartate, or glutamate residues may be detected. A protein may be immobilized on an electrode and a small amount of a protease and a potential protease inhibitor added, so that the effectiveness of a panel of protease inhibitors may be determined in numerous parallel reactions.
Molecules that act on phosphate groups may also be monitored by the present CPD system. This includes phosphotases and kinases. Measurable kinases include protein kinases, such as protein kinase C and serine/threonin kinsases, as well as pyruvate kinases, glycerol kinases and the like.
Other ATP dependent reactions measurable in the present system include that activity of DNA gyrase (which is modified by certain antibiotics) and the synthesis of glutathione (gamma-glu-cys-gly; GSH). GSH is usually present at high concentrations in most living cells, being the major reservoir of non-protein reduced sulfur. Because of its unique redox and nucleophilic properties, GSH serves in bio-reductive reactions as an important line of defense against reactive oxygen species, xenobiotics and heavy metals. GSH is synthesized from its constituent amino acids by two ATP-dependent reactions catalyzed by gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase and glutathione synthetase.
Other enzymes, such as desulfurases (e.g. cysteine desulfurase), generate protons in solution and their activity will be detectible and measurable by the present devices. Sulfonucleotide reductases are a diverse family of enzymes that catalyze the first committed step of reductive sulfur assimilation. In this reaction, activated sulfate in the context of adenosine-phosphosulfate (APS) or -phosphoadenosine-phosphosulfate (PAPS) is converted to sulfite with reducing equivalents from thioredoxin. The sulfite generated in this reaction is utilized in bacteria and plants for the eventual production of essential biomolecules such as cysteine and coenzyme A. Humans do not possess a homologous metabolic pathway, and thus, these enzymes represent attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. Inhibitors of such enzymes could be added to wells containing one or more variants of such enzymes and their sulfate substrates and cofactors. Further details are given in Carroll K S, Gao H, Chen H, Stout C D, Leary J A, et al. (2005) “A Conserved Mechanism for Sulfonucleotide Reduction,” PLoS Biol 3(8): e250.
Other applications for measurement of reactions with the present methods and apparatus include the measurement of the release or formation of phosphate drugs, such as pyrophosphate analogs, e.g. 4-amino-1 hydroxybutylidene bisphosphonic acid monosodium salt (Fosamax®). Cell membranes containing ion channels may be attached to the electrodes, and the effect of test substances on ion permeability measured.
The present DNA sequencing reactions could also be repeated using the original templates, if the hybridized strand is denatured and washed away, leaving the target DNA. This would allow re-use of a device.
The present examples, methods, procedures, specific compounds and molecules are meant to exemplify and illustrate the invention and should in no way be seen as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the literal and equivalent scope of the appended claims. Any patents or publications mentioned in this specification are indicative of levels of those skilled in the art to which the patent pertains and are intended to convey details of the invention which may not be explicitly set out but would be understood by workers in the field. Such patents or publications are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each was specifically and individually incorporated by reference and for the purpose of describing and enabling the method or material referred to.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/967,287 filed on Apr. 30, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/973,452 filed on Dec. 17, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/903,734 filed on May 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,228,971, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/434,627 filed on Mar. 29, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,753,812, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/170,607 filed on Jun. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,313,907, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/821,809 filed on Jun. 23, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,012,756, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/271,678 filed on Nov. 10, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,785,785, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/627,192 filed on Nov. 12, 2004, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under contracts AI059499 and HG000205 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4411741 | Janata | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4490216 | McConnell | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4641084 | Komatsu | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4722830 | Urie et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4743954 | Brown | May 1988 | A |
| 4764797 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4777019 | Dandekar | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4822566 | Newman | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4863849 | Melamede | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4864229 | Lauks et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4874499 | Smith et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4971903 | Hyman | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5038192 | Bonneau | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5110441 | Kinlen et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5113870 | Rossenfeld | May 1992 | A |
| 5151759 | Vinal | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5164319 | Hafeman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5192507 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5284566 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5317407 | Michon | May 1994 | A |
| 5431883 | Barraud | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5436149 | Barnes | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5439839 | Jang | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5466348 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5500188 | Hafeman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5521101 | Saini et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5540828 | Yacynych | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5554339 | Cozzette et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5583462 | Grasshoff | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593838 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600451 | Maki | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5631704 | Dickinson et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5637469 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5702964 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5793230 | Chu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5911873 | McCARRON et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923421 | Rajic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5955379 | Lennox et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958703 | Dower et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6002299 | Thomsen | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6100045 | Van Es | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107032 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6210891 | Nyren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6255678 | Sawada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6274320 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6322963 | Bauer | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327410 | Walt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6355431 | Chee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361671 | Mathies et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6384684 | Redman-White | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391558 | Henkens et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6403957 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413792 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429027 | Chee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432360 | Church | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6433386 | Yun et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6465178 | Chappa et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6468785 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475728 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482639 | Snow et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6485944 | Church et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6499499 | Dantsker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6511803 | Church et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6518024 | Choong et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6518146 | Singh et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6537881 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538593 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6545620 | Groeneweg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6602702 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605428 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6613513 | Parce et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624637 | Pechstein | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6627154 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6652720 | Mansouri et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654505 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6682899 | Bryan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6700814 | Nahas et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6762050 | Fukushima et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6780591 | Williams et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6831994 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6919211 | Fodor et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6939451 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953958 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6998274 | Chee et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7125478 | Selvaganapathy et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7223540 | Pourmand et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7785785 | Pourmand | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8012756 | Pourmand | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8313907 | Pourmand et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 9228971 | Pourmand | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 20010007418 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021534 | Wohlstadter et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024790 | Kambara et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020012930 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012933 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020001801 | Fan et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020039743 | Hashimoto et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042059 | Makarov et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042388 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086318 | Manalis et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061529 | Bridgham et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090649 | Chan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094533 | Hess et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117659 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117694 | Migliorato et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123048 | Gau | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129333 | Chandhoke et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131899 | Kovacs | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132221 | Chee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137062 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155476 | Pourmand et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168678 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172963 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187515 | Chee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030215857 | Kilger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032052 | Hadd et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044997 | Kasahara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030049624 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054396 | Weiner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064366 | Hardin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030068629 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077615 | Bridgham et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082583 | Hassibi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100102 | Rothberg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030102510 | Lim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108867 | Chee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124599 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138809 | Williams et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148301 | Aono et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148344 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152985 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157504 | Chee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030186262 | Cailloux et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030194740 | Williams | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224419 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040012998 | Chien et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038420 | Gelbart et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049237 | Larson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040134798 | Toumazou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136866 | Pontis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185484 | Costa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197793 | Hassibi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197803 | Yaku et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235216 | Rhodes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248161 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006234 | Hassibi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009022 | Weiner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031490 | Gumbrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032075 | Yaku et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032076 | Williams et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042627 | Chakrabarti | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050062093 | Sawada et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079510 | Berka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084851 | Ronaghi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050093072 | Bonges et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106587 | Klapproth et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119497 | Hong et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123937 | Thorp et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130173 | Leamon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130188 | Walt et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156207 | Yazawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181440 | Chee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212016 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224346 | Holm-Kennedy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227264 | Nobile et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050230271 | Levon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233318 | Chee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239132 | Klapprith | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060105373 | Pourmand et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070181466 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20090104707 | Wang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20100075340 | Javanmard et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0223618 | May 1987 | EP |
| 2004-141158 | May 2004 | JP |
| WO-200181896 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-2002077287 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO-2002086162 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO-2003073088 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004040291 | May 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Akiyama, et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEE Transactions on Electron Devices(1982) 20(12):1936-1941. |
| Cagnin et al. (2009) “Overview of Electrochemical DNA Biosensors: New Approaches to Detect the Expression of Life” Sensors: 9:3122-3148. |
| Chang, et al., “Detection of Allelic Imbalance in Ascitic Supernatant by Digital Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis,” Clinical Cancer Research, Aug. 2002, 2580-2585, vol. 8. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2007, Section C indicating references cited previously. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2007, Section C indicating “No References”. |
| Daniels and Pourmand (2007) “Label-Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges” Electroanalysis; 19(12):1239-1257. |
| Drummond, et al., “Electrochemical DNA sensors,” Nature Biotechnology, Oct. 2003, 1192-1199, vol. 21, No. 10. |
| Fritz et al. “Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge”, PNAS, Oct. 20, 2002, 99 (22): 14142-14146. |
| Gupta, et al., “YBCO-FET room temperature ammonia sensor,” Sensors and Actuators B. 2000, 35-41. |
| Han Y, “Label-free detection of biomolecules by a field-effect transistor microarray biosensor with bio-functionalized gate surfaces,” Masters Dissertation (2006) pp. 1-63. |
| Kim D. et al., “An FET-type charger sensor for highly sensitive detection of DNA sequence,” Biosens Bioelectron (2004) 20(1):69-74. |
| Lowe, “An introduction to the concepts and technology of biosensors,” Biosensors, 1985, 1, 3-16. |
| Margulies, et al., “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors,” Nature, Jul. 31, 2005. |
| Marshall A. et al., “DNA chips: an array of possibilities,” Nature Biotechnology (1998) 16:27-31. |
| Miyahara Y. et al., “Direct Transduction of Primer Extension into Electrical Signal Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor,” Micro Total Analysis Systems (2004) 1:303-305. |
| Miyahara Y. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Using Field Effect Transistor,” The Japan Society of Applied Physics, No. 3 (Translation included) (2003) pp. 1180, 30A-S2. |
| Pourmand at al. (2006) “Direct electrical detection of DNA synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, 6466-6470. |
| Pourmand, at al., “Multiplex Pyrosequencing,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, vol. 30, No. 7 e31. |
| Purushothaman S. et al., “Towards Fast Solid State DNA Sequencing,” IEEE ISCAS 2002 Proceedings, Circuits and Systems (2002) 4:IV-169-IV-172. |
| Sakata T. et al., “Detection of DNA recognition events using multi-well field effect transistor,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics (2005) 21:827-832. |
| Sakata T. et al., “Direct Detection of Single-Base Extension Reaction Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor,” Proc. of 3rd Ann. Intl. IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Kahuku, Oahu, HI, May 12-15, 2005, pp. 219-222. |
| Sakata T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2006) 118:2283-2286. |
| Sakata T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism by Using a Genetic Field-effect transistor,” ChemBioChem (2005) 6:703-710. |
| Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Analysis Chip Based on Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2854-2859. |
| Sakurai T. et al., “Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Polymerase Reactions by a Micro ISFET pH Sensor,” Anal Chem (1992) 64(17):1996-1997. |
| Sawada K. et al., “Highly sensitive ion sensors using charge transfer technique,” Sensors Actuators B (2004) 98:69-72. |
| Stefano Cagnin et al., “Overview of Electrochemical DNA Biosensors: New Approaches to Detect the Expression of Life,” Sensors (2009) 9:3122-3148. |
| Thomas (1977) “Microelectrode amplifier with improved method of input-capacitance neutralization” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computation: 15:450-454. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210230678 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60627192 | Nov 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13170607 | Jun 2011 | US |
| Child | 13434627 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15967287 | Apr 2018 | US |
| Child | 17087336 | US | |
| Parent | 14973452 | Dec 2015 | US |
| Child | 15967287 | US | |
| Parent | 13903734 | May 2013 | US |
| Child | 14973452 | US | |
| Parent | 13434627 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Child | 13903734 | US | |
| Parent | 12821809 | Jun 2010 | US |
| Child | 13170607 | US | |
| Parent | 11271678 | Nov 2005 | US |
| Child | 12821809 | US |
