1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a charge pump circuit, especially a charge pump circuit having reduced clock feed-through, reduced charge injection and reduced up/down current mismatch.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Phase locked loop (PLL) circuits are utilized in various types of electronic devices and systems. The PLL circuits are typically utilized in devices for clock signal generation, clock sampling, signal synchronization and frequency synthesis for generating clocks and signals. Charge pump circuits are often used for changing voltage levels in PLL circuits.
Please refer to
The PMOS switch K5 and the NMOS switch K6 are both coupled to a charge pump output OUT and controlled by control signals UN and DP generated from a phase frequency detector (PFD) 30. However, when the control signals change from HIGH to LOW or from LOW to HIGH, the state transitions may cause an unwanted voltage swing at the charge pump output OUT due to parasitic capacitors Cgsp, Cgdp, Cgsn, and Cgdn coupled to the PMOS switch K5 and the NMOS switch K6. The above voltage swing effect is called clock feed-through.
Besides, when the PMOS switch K5 and NMOS switch K6 are turned off, the charge in the depletion region of the channel will be injected to the parasitic capacitors Cgsp, Cgdp, Cgsn and Cgdn, also causing an unwanted voltage swing at the charge pump output OUT. The above voltage swing effect is called charge injection.
Further, the voltage swing may cause the up/down current mismatch to the charge pump circuit 100. For example, when the voltage level at the charge pump output OUT becomes higher, the drain-to-source voltage of the NMOS transistor K4 will be higher, increasing the current flowing from the charge pump output OUT through the NMOS switch K6. Moreover, when the voltage level at the charge pump output OUT becomes higher, the source-to-drain voltage of the PMOS transistor K2 will become lower, lowering the current flowing from the voltage source VDD through the PMOS transistor K2.
The aforementioned clock feed through, charge injection and up/down current mismatch effect caused by the voltage swing of the charge pump output OUT will result in spurious noise in the output signals generated from the charge pump output OUT, deteriorating the quality of the generated output signals.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a charge pump circuit. The charge pump circuit comprises a first comparator, a PMOS tuner, a first current mirror, a first NMOS transistor, a first PMOS switch, an NMOS tuner, a second current mirror, a first PMOS transistor, and a first NMOS switch. The first comparator has a first input end, a second input end, and an output end coupled to the second input end of the first comparator. The PMOS tuner has a source coupled to a voltage source, and a gate for receiving a first bias voltage. The first current mirror comprises a source PMOS transistor and a first output PMOS transistor. The source PMOS transistor has a source coupled to the voltage source, and a gate coupled to a drain of the source PMOS transistor. The first output PMOS transistor has a gate coupled to the gate of the source PMOS transistor, and a drain coupled to the first input of the first comparator. The first NMOS transistor has a drain coupled to the gate of the first output PMOS transistor, a gate coupled to the output end of the first comparator, and a source coupled to ground. The first PMOS switch has a drain coupled to the source of the first output PMOS transistor, a source coupled to a drain of the PMOS tuner, and a gate for receiving a first control signal. The NMOS tuner has a source coupled to ground, and a gate for receiving a second bias voltage. The second current mirror comprises a source NMOS transistor and a first output NMOS transistor. The NMOS transistor has a source coupled to ground, and a gate coupled to a drain of the source NMOS transistor. The first output NMOS transistor has a gate coupled to the gate of the source NMOS transistor, and a drain coupled to the first input of the first comparator. The first PMOS transistor has a drain coupled to the gate of the first output NMOS transistor, a gate coupled to the output end of the first comparator, and a source coupled to the voltage source. The first NMOS switch has a drain coupled to the source of the first output NMOS transistor, a source coupled to the drain of the NMOS tuner, and a gate for receiving a second control signal.
These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
Please refer to
The charging and discharging of the load capacitor in the loop filter 216 will affect an output voltage of the loop filter 216 delivered to the VCO 218. The VCO 218 changes the phase or frequency of the output signal Fout according to the voltage outputted from the loop filter 216. According to the above configuration, the PLL circuit 250 continuously modifies the output signal Fout according to the input reference signal Fref.
Please refer to
The NMOS tuner M7 has a source coupled to ground, and a gate for receiving a second bias voltage VB2. The second current mirror 320 comprises a source NMOS transistor M9 having a source coupled to ground, and a gate coupled to a drain of the source NMOS transistor M9. The second current mirror 320 further comprises a first output NMOS transistor M6 having a gate coupled to the gate of the source NMOS transistor M9, and a drain coupled to the first input 301 of the first comparator 38. The first PMOS transistor M10 has a drain coupled to the gate of the first output NMOS transistor M6, a gate coupled to the output end 303 of the first comparator 38, and a source coupled to the voltage source VDD. The first NMOS switch 314 has a drain coupled to the source of the first output NMOS transistor M6, a source coupled to the drain of the NMOS tuner M7, and a gate for receiving a second control signal DN2.
In general, the first control signal UP1 is a logical inverse of the second control signal DN2. However, depending on the types of components, the first control signal UP1 and the second control signal DN2 may have the same logical value.
In the first embodiment, when the voltage swing occurs at the charge pump output Vcont, the clock feed through, charge injection and up/down current mismatch effect can be reduced, thus the quality of the generated signals at the charge pump output Vcont will not be deteriorated. For example, when the voltage level at the charge pump output Vcont becomes higher, the drain-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 will also become higher. Due to the channel length modulation effect, the increase of the drain-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 may increase the current flowing from the charge pump output Vcont through the first output NMOS transistor M6. On the other hand, when the voltage level at the charge pump output Vcont becomes higher, the source-to-gate voltage of the first PMOS transistor M10 will become lower due to the configuration of the first comparator 38, and the current flowing through the source NMOS transistor M9 will also become lower, thus lowering the gate-to-source voltage of the source NMOS transistor M9, and the gate-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 will also become lower due to the configuration of the second current mirror 320. Therefore, since the gate-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 is lower, the abovementioned channel length modulation effect can be moderated, and the magnitude of the current flowing from the charge pump output Vcont through the first output NMOS M6 will not be substantially affected.
That is, though the drain-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 increases due to the increase of the voltage level of the charge pump output Vcont, the gate-to-source voltage of the first output NMOS transistor M6 will also increase, moderating the channel length modulation effect. Therefore, the current flowing from the charge pump output Vcont through the first output NMOS transistor M6 will not increase with the increase of the voltage level of the charge pump output Vcont. Similarly, the current flowing from the voltage source through the first output PMOS transistor M2 will not decrease with the increase of the charge pump output Vcont. Hence, the voltage swing at the charge pump output Vcont will not substantially affect the magnitude of the current flowing from the voltage source VDD through the first output PMOS transistor M2 and the current flowing from the charge pump output Vcont through the first output NMOS transistor M6.
Therefore, in the first embodiment, when the voltage swing occurs at the charge pump output Vcont, the up/down current mismatch effect can be reduced, thus the quality of the generated signals at the charge pump output Vcont can be maintained.
Please refer to
Please refer to
In the second embodiment, the voltage level at the output end 303 of the first comparator 38 is limited to a range which can turn on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 at the same time. In order to turn on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 at the same time, if the threshold voltage of the second PMOS switch M3 and the first PMOS transistor M10 is Vtp, and the threshold voltage of the first NMOS transistor M5 and the second NMOS switch M8 is Vtn, then the voltage level capable of turning on both the second PMOS switch M3 and the first PMOS transistor M10 must be lower than (VDD-Vtp), and the voltage level capable of turning on both the first NMOS transistor M5 and the second NMOS switch M8 must be higher than Vtn. Therefore, the voltage level at the output end 303 of the first comparator 38 capable of turning on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 is between (VDD-Vtp) and Vtn. When the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 are turned on, the PMOS tuner M1, the first PMOS switch 312, the first NMOS switch 314 and the NMOS tuner M7 will be turned on, thus forming a current path from the voltage source VDD through PMOS tuner M1, the first PMOS switch 312, the first output PMOS transistor M2, the first output NMOS transistor M6, the first NMOS switch 314 and the NMOS tuner M7 to ground in the charge pump circuit 500. Therefore, the power consumption of the charge pump circuit 500 is reduced.
Please refer to
The charge pump circuit 600 provides another charge and discharge path to prevent the charge sharing effect occurred at the drain of the PMOS tuner M1. For example, when the first PMOS switch 312 is turned on, the third PMOS switch 612 is turned off, and vice versa. By alternating the charge/discharge paths through the first PMOS switch 312 and the third PMOS switch 612, the voltage level at the drain of the PMOS tuner M1 can be refrained below a predetermined value, reducing the aforementioned channel length modulation effect.
Please refer to
In the fourth embodiment, the voltage level at the output end 303 of the first comparator 38 is limited to a range which can turn on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 at the same time. In order to turn on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 at the same time, if the threshold voltage of the second PMOS switch M3 and the first PMOS transistor M10 is Vtp, and the threshold voltage of the first NMOS transistor M5 and the second NMOS switch M8 is Vtp, then the voltage level capable of turning on both the second PMOS switch M3 and the first PMOS transistor M10 must be lower than (VDD-Vtp), and the voltage level capable of turning on both the first NMOS transistor M5 and the second NMOS switch M8 must be higher than Vtn. Therefore, the voltage level at the output end 303 of the first comparator 38 capable of turning on the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 is between (VDD-Vtp) and Vtn. When the second PMOS switch M3, the first NMOS transistor M5, the second NMOS switch M8 and the first PMOS transistor M10 are turned on, the PMOS tuner M1, the first PMOS switch 312, the first NMOS switch 314 and the NMOS tuner M7 will be turned on, thus forming a current path from the voltage source VDD through PMOS tuner M1, the first PMOS switch 312, the first output PMOS transistor M2, the first output NMOS transistor M6, the first NMOS switch 314 and the NMOS tuner M7 to ground in the charge pump circuit 700. Therefore, the power consumption of the charge pump circuit 700 is reduced.
In the charge pump circuits 300, 500, 600, 700, when the voltage swing occurs at the charge pump output Vcont, the clock feed through, charge injection and up/down current mismatch effect can be reduced, thus the quality of the generated signals at the charge pump output Vcont can be maintained. In the charge pump circuits 500 and 700, the voltage level at the output end 303 of the first comparator 38 is limited to a range, thus forming a current path from the voltage source VDD through PMOS tuner M1, the first PMOS switch 312, the first output PMOS transistor M2, the first output NMOS transistor M6, the first NMOS switch 314 and the NMOS tuner M7 to ground in the charge pump circuits 500 and 700. Therefore, the power consumption of the charge pump circuits 500 and 700 are reduced. In the charge pump circuits 600 and 700, another charge and discharge path is provided to prevent the charge sharing effect occurred at the drain of the PMOS tuner M1, thus reducing the channel length modulation effect.
Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3663828 | Low | May 1972 | A |
3818402 | Golaski | Jun 1974 | A |
4163944 | Chambers | Aug 1979 | A |
4245355 | Pascoe | Jan 1981 | A |
4409608 | Yoder | Oct 1983 | A |
4816784 | Rabjohn | Mar 1989 | A |
5159205 | Gorecki | Oct 1992 | A |
5208725 | Akcasu | May 1993 | A |
5212653 | Tanaka | May 1993 | A |
5406447 | Miyazaki | Apr 1995 | A |
5446309 | Adachi | Aug 1995 | A |
5508660 | Gersbach | Apr 1996 | A |
5583359 | Ng | Dec 1996 | A |
5637900 | Ker | Jun 1997 | A |
5760456 | Grzegorek | Jun 1998 | A |
5808330 | Rostoker | Sep 1998 | A |
5923225 | De Los Santos | Jul 1999 | A |
5959820 | Ker | Sep 1999 | A |
6008102 | Alford | Dec 1999 | A |
6081146 | Shiochi | Jun 2000 | A |
6172378 | Hull | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194739 | Ivanov | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6246271 | Takada | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6285578 | Huang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291872 | Wang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6370372 | Molnar | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407412 | Iniewski | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427226 | Mallick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448858 | Helms | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452442 | Laude | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456221 | Low | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6461914 | Roberts | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480137 | Kulkarni | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483188 | Yue | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486765 | Katayanagi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509805 | Ochiai | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6518165 | Yoon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521939 | Yeo | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545547 | Fridi | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560306 | Duffy | May 2003 | B1 |
6588002 | Lampaert | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593838 | Yue | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603360 | Kim | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608363 | Fazelpour | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611223 | Low | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6625077 | Chen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630897 | Low | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639298 | Chaudhry | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653868 | Oodaira | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668358 | Friend | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700771 | Bhattacharyya | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717446 | Vu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720608 | Lee | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724677 | Su | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6756656 | Lowther | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6795001 | Roza | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796017 | Harding | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798011 | Adan | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810242 | Molnar | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822282 | Randazzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822312 | Sowlati | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833756 | Ranganathan | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841847 | Sia | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847572 | Lee | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853272 | Hughes | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6876056 | Tilmans | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885534 | Ker | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6901126 | Gu | May 2005 | B1 |
6905889 | Lowther | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909149 | Russ | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927664 | Nakatani | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958522 | Clevenger | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7009252 | Lin | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027276 | Chen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7205612 | Cai | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7262069 | Chung | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7365627 | Yen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7368761 | Lai | May 2008 | B1 |
7405642 | Hsu | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7672100 | Van Camp | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8063678 | Wadhwa et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8217693 | Mei et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010052811 | Kim | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019123 | Ma | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020036545 | Fridi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020188920 | Lampaert | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042949 | Si | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076636 | Ker | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030127691 | Yue | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183403 | Kluge | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050068112 | Glenn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068113 | Glenn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050087787 | Ando | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060006431 | Jean | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060108694 | Hung | May 2006 | A1 |
20060267102 | Cheng | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070102745 | Hsu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210416 | Hsu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234554 | Hung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246801 | Hung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249294 | Wu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070296055 | Yen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080094166 | Hsu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080185679 | Hsu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189662 | Nandy | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200132 | Hsu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080299738 | Hsu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303623 | Hsu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090029324 | Clark | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090201625 | Liao | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100279484 | Wang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012653 | Li | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Chen, U.S. Appl. No. 13/190,555, filed Jul. 26, 2011. |
Sidiropoulos, “Adaptive Bandwidth DLLs and PLLs using Regulated Supply CMOS Buffers”, 2000. |