Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6072970
-
Patent Number
6,072,970
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, October 29, 199628 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 6, 200024 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
- G03G15/0233 - Structure, details of the charging member
- C08K5/0025 - Crosslinking or vulcanising agents; including accelerators
- Y10T428/13 - Hollow or container type article [e.g., tube, vase, etc.]
- Y10T428/139 - Open-ended, self-supporting conduit, cylinder, or tube-type article
- Y10T428/2933 - Coated or with bond, impregnation or core
- Y10T428/294 - including metal or compound thereof [excluding glass, ceramic and asbestos]
- Y10T428/2947 - Synthetic resin or polymer in plural coatings, each of different type
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 428 341
- 428 375
- 428 379
- 428 383
- 428 369
- 399 176
- 399 117
- 399 313
- 399 31
- 399 50
- 361 225
- 361 221
- 361 230
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A charge roller has a steel shaft and conductive outer cylindrical body which is formed by curing with heat a blend comprised of epichlorohydrin rubber, mineral-oil-free zinc oxide dispersion, stearic acid as a lubricant, accelerators and a sulfur donor. The roller has a long useful life and does not express oil while inactive.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to electrostatic imaging. More specifically, this invention relates to an improved composition of the outer body of a charge roller.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As is now widely conventional in xerographic systems, a photoconductive (PC) drum or belt is charged and then partially discharged to form an electrostatic image. Since contact charging produces little environmental ozone, it is frequently employed as the manner of charging.
A previous contact charging roller which is now prior art to this invention was effective for its purpose since the charge roller was in the cartridge (15,000 average page life) and therefore did not require functioning over the full life of the printer (250,000 average page life). Also, the operating speed of the PC drum was up to 16 pages per minute, while the roller of this invention will operate at up to 24 pages per minute.
Life testing of that prior art charge roller showed loss of ability to charge a photoconductor drum over a 250,000 page life test. Typically, a new charge roller was capable of charging the photoconductor drum to a voltage of 900 v, while at end-of-life the prior charge roller was capable of charging the drum to 500 v. Ideally the charge voltage would remain constant at 900 v. The decrease in charge voltage was primarily due to a gradual increase in the resistance of the charge roller over the life of the test. The typical nip resistance of the roller at the start of life was 1 mega ohm while typical resistance at the end of life was 50 mega ohms.
This gradual increase in resistance over life, termed electrical fatigue, is very undesirable to the operation of a long-life charge roller. A reduction in the rate of resistance increase greatly improves the performance of the charge roller over life of operation.
Additionally, the prior art formula contained zinc oxide added as a dispersion in mineral oil. Where the charge roll is under pressure, as when mounted in a cartridge in contact with a photoconductor drum, the oil has been found to be a contaminant.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
This charge roller comprises a conductive core, typically a steel shaft, and a compliant, conductive or semiconductive cylindrical body mounted on the core. In accordance with this invention, the body is the product of curing a mixture of epichlorohydrin rubber, zinc oxide, an organic lubricant, accelerators and a sulfur donor in the absence of elemental sulfur significant to crosslinking the rubber. The zinc oxide is in the form of a powder or in the form of a dispersion in a rubber, thereby eliminating oil which can be expressed out and briefly interfere with imaging performance.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The following Table 1 gives the trade name, chemical name, purpose, and supplier for all ingredients for the two formulas.
TABLE 1______________________________________Trade Name Chemical Name Purpose Supplier______________________________________Hydrin T65 Epichlorohydrin rubber, Semi- Zeon 2.4 mole % allyl glycidyl conductive ether (AGE), 48.8 mole % rubber ethylene oxide (EO), 48.8 mole % epichlorohydrin (ECH), Mooney viscosity 65 (ML 1' + 4' @ 100 C.).Hydrin 3100 Epichlorohydrin rubber, Semi- Zeon 8.0 mole % AGE, 25 mole conductive % EO, 67 mole % ECH, rubber Mooney viscosity 72 (ML 1' + 4' @ 100 C.).Stearic Acid Stearic Acid Lubricant, (multiple) activatorRHENOGRAN Zinc oxide (ZnO) Activator RheinZnO 85 SG dispersion, French process Chemie grade, very fine particle size, 85% active, dispersed in ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM)ELASTOZINC Zinc oxide dispersion Activator Elastochem in mineral oil, 90% activeALTAX Mercaptobenzothiazole Accelerator RT disulfide (MBTS) powder VanderbiltUNADS Tetramethylthiuram Accelerator RT monosulfide (TMTM) Vanderbilt powderV (MT) D-75 Tetramethylthiuram Accelerator Rhein disulfide (TMTD) and Chemie dispersion, 75% active CrosslinkerMETHYL Zinc Accelerator RTZIMATE dimethyldithiocarbamate and VanderbiltPELFORM (ZDMC) dispersion, Crosslinker 75% activeE(SR)D-75 Dithiodimorpholine Crosslinker Rhein (DTDM) dispersion, Chemie 75% activePB(RM-S)-80 Rubbermaker's sulfur Crosslinker Elastochem dispersion, 80% active______________________________________
A comparison between the prior art formula improved by this invention and this invention is as follows in Table 2. The ingredient amounts are in parts by weight.
TABLE 2______________________________________ New Hydrin Prior ArtIngredient Formulation Formulation Purpose______________________________________Hydrin T65 90 90 RubberHydrin 3100 10 10 RubberRHENOGRAN ZnO 85 SG 5 0 ActivatorELASTOZINC 0 5 ActivatorStearic Acid 1 1 Lubricant and ActivatorALTAX 1.00 1.00 AcceleratorUNADS 0.40 0.40 AcceleratorV(MT)D-75 0 0.53 Accelerator and CrosslinkerMETHYL ZIMATE 1.60 0 Accelerator andPELFORM CrosslinkerE(SR)D-75 1.75 0 CrosslinkerPB(RM-S)-80 0 0.63 CrosslinkerTotal 110.75 108.56______________________________________
The epichlorohydrin rubbers used in this invention are terpolymers of epichlorohydrin, ethylene oxide, and allyl glycidyl ether. These monomers are arranged randomly in the polymer chain. The illustrative structure is shown below, with the epichlorohydrin moiety (left) being in a randomly dispersed amount x, the AGE moiety (center) being in a randomly dispersed amount y, and the ethylene oxide moiety (right) being in a randomly dispersed amount z. ##STR1##
The various grades of epichlorohydrin rubber differ in the molar percentages of the three monomers x, y, and z in the above structure. The values of x, y, and z for Hydrin T65 and Hydrin 3100 are indicated in Table 1 above.
Higher EO content will make the polymer more conductive and higher AGE will make the polymer more compression-set-resistant. In the current formula it was necessary to blend two grades of the rubber to achieve the desired levels of EO and AGE since a single grade with the desired levels was not commercially available.
The RHEONGRAN ZnO 85 SG replaces the ELASTOZINC to eliminate the small amount of oil used as a binder in the ELASTOZINC (the RHEONGRAN has a rubbery polymer binder). This eliminates the bleeding of oil under prolonged pressure, which causes a minor, temporary print defect when the oil is on the photoconductor.
The use of the sulfur donor DTDM and the use of either TMTD or ZDMC accelerator are effective in reducing the electrical fatigue.
Magnesium oxide is believed to be an alternative activator to zinc oxide, but much slower.
The use of dispersions is a processing convenience since dispersions are easier to handle than loose powders. They also make the mixing action more efficient in achieving good dispersion of the active ingredient into the mix. Powders and dispersions will both effect the same final properties of the cured rubber.
The rubber is blended using a two-roll mill or an internal mixer. The ingredients are typically added in the order listed in the formula and thoroughly blended before the next ingredient is added. The rubber is molded in cylindrical form around a steel shaft in a heated press and cured for approximately 15 minutes at 320F. This processing is the same as that of the foregoing prior art roller of Table 2.
The cured rubber has the following properties:
______________________________________Hardness: 38 +/- 5 Shore A (ASTM D2240)Compression Set: Less than 12% (ASTM D395, 22 hrs., Method B, 70 C.)______________________________________
Alternatives and variations can be anticipated. Accordingly, patent protection as provided by law is sought, with particular reference to the accompanying claims.
Claims
- 1. A charge roller comprising a conductive core and an outer cylindrical body around said core which is the product of the following ingredients thoroughly mixed and cured by heat, said curing being in the absence of elemental sulfur significant to said curing: epichlorohydrin rubber, organic acid lubricant, metal oxide activator, accelerator and sulfur donor.
- 2. The charge roller as in claim 1 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 3. The charge roller as in claim 1 in which said activator is zinc oxide.
- 4. The charge roller as in claim 3 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 5. The charge roller as in claim 4 in which said accelerator comprises a zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate dispersion.
- 6. The charge roller as in claim 1 in which said accelerator comprises a zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate dispersion.
- 7. The charge roller as in claim 2 in which said accelerator comprises a zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate dispersion.
- 8. The charge roller as in claim 3 in which said accelerator comprises a zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate dispersion.
- 9. The charge roller as in claim 5 in which with respect to said mixed ingredients: said lubricant is about 1 part by weight stearic acid, said rubber is about 100 parts by weight, said accelerator except for said zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate is about 1.40 parts by weight, said zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate is a 75% active dispersion of about 1.60 parts by weight, said dithiodimorpholine is a 75% active dispersion of about 1.75 parts by weight, and said zinc oxide activator is an 85% active dispersion in rubber of about 5 parts by weight.
- 10. The charge roller as in claim 1 in which said metal oxide activator is a dispersion in rubber.
- 11. The charge roller as in claim 2 in which said metal oxide activator is a dispersion in rubber.
- 12. The charge roller as in claim 3 in which said zinc oxide activator is a dispersion in rubber.
- 13. The charge roller as in claim 4 in which said zinc oxide activator is a dispersion in rubber.
- 14. The charge roller as in claim 5 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 15. The charge roller as in claim 6 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 16. The charge roller as in claim 7 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 17. The charge roller as in claim 8 in which said sulfur donor is dithiodimorpholine.
- 18. A charge roller comprising a conductive core and an outer cylindrical body around said core which is the product of the following ingredients thoroughly mixed and cured with sulfur by heat: epichlorohydrin rubber, organic acid lubricant, metal oxide activator dispersed in rubber, accelerator and sulfur donor.
- 19. The charge roller as in claim 18 in which said accelerator comprises a zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate dispersion.
- 20. The charge roller as in claims 19 in which said activator is zinc oxide.
- 21. The charge roller as in claim 18 which said activator is zinc oxide.
US Referenced Citations (21)